Comments
Description
Transcript
Cognitive Theories
330 Chapter 8 Motivation and Emotion electrical stimulation had been delivered to a certain area of their brains. The stimulation was obviously pleasurable, because when the animals were allowed to control delivery of the stimulation by pressing a lever, they pressed it until they were exhausted, ignoring even food and water (Olds & Milner, 1954). The brain areas in which stimulation is experienced as especially pleasurable include the dopamine systems, which, as described in the chapter on consciousness, are activated by cocaine and other psychoactive drugs (Bardo, 1998). In contrast, stimulation of other brain regions is so unpleasant that animals will work hard to avoid it. Presumably, part of the direct central experience of emotion involves areas of the brain whose activity is experienced as either pleasant or aversive. In humans, these areas have extensive connections throughout the brain (Fossati et al., 2003). As a result, the representation of emotion in the brain probably involves activity in widely distributed neural circuits, not just in a narrowly localized emotion “center” (Derryberry & Tucker, 1992). Cognitive Theories attribution The process of explaining the cause of some event. excitation transfer The process by which arousal is carried over from one experience to an independent situation. Suppose you are about to be interviewed for your first job, or to go out on a blind date, or to take your first ride in a hot-air balloon. In such situations, it is not always easy to be sure of what you are feeling. Is it fear, excitement, anticipation, worry, happiness, dread, or what? Stanley Schachter suggested that the emotions we experience every day are shaped partly by how we interpret the arousal we feel. His cognitive theory of emotion is known as the Schachter-Singer theory in recognition of the contributions of Jerome Singer. The theory took shape in the early 1960s, when many psychologists were raising questions about the validity of James’s theory of emotion. Schachter argued that the theory was essentially correct—but required a few modifications (Cornelius, 1996). According to the Schachter-Singer theory, emotions result from a combination of feedback from the body’s responses and our interpretation of what caused those responses. So cognitive interpretation comes into play twice: first when you perceive the situation that leads to bodily responses and again when you interpret those responses as a particular emotion (see Figure 8.8). Schachter said that a given pattern of physiological responses can be interpreted in many different ways and so might give rise to many different emotions. According to Schachter, then, the emotion you experience when that bear approaches your campsite might be fear, excitement, astonishment, or surprise, depending on how you label your bodily reactions to seeing it (Schachter & Singer, 1962). Schachter also said that how we label arousal depends on attribution, the process of identifying the cause of some event. We attribute our physiological arousal to different emotions depending on the information we have about the situation. For example, if you are watching the final seconds of a close ball game, you might attribute your racing heart, rapid breathing, and perspiration to excitement; but you might attribute the same physiological reactions to anxiety if you are waiting for a big exam to begin. Schachter predicted that our emotional experiences will be less intense if we attribute arousal to a nonemotional cause. So if you notice your heart pounding before an exam but say to yourself, “Sure my heart’s pounding—I just drank five cups of coffee!” then you should feel “wired” from caffeine rather than afraid or worried. This prediction has received some support (Mezzacappa, Katkin, & Palmer, 1999; Sinclair et al., 1994), but other aspects of Schachter’s theory have not. Few researchers today fully accept the Schachter-Singer theory, but it did stimulate an enormous amount of valuable research. That research includes studies of excitation transfer, a phenomenon in which physiological arousal from one experience carries over to affect emotion in an independent situation (Reisenzein, 1983; Zillmann, 1984). For example, people who have been aroused by physical exercise become angrier when provoked and experience more intense sexual feelings around an attractive person than do people who have been less physically active (Allen et al., 1989). Arousal from fear, like arousal from exercise, can also enhance emotions, including sexual feelings. One study of this transfer took place in Canada, near a deep river gorge. The gorge Theories of Emotion 331 Schachter’s cognitive theory of emotion predicts that these people will attribute their physiological arousal to the game they are watching and will label their emotion “excitement.” Further, as described in the chapter on health, stress, and coping, the emotions they experience will also depend partly on their cognitive interpretation of the outcome (Lazarus & Folkman, 1984). Those who see their team’s defeat as a disaster will experience more negative emotions than those who think of it as a challenge to improve. LABELING AROUSAL could be crossed either by a shaky swinging bridge or by a more stable wooden structure. A female researcher asked men who had just crossed each bridge to fill out a questionnaire that included a measure of sexual imagery. The men who met the woman after crossing the more dangerous bridge had much higher sexual imagery scores than the men who had crossed the stable bridge. Furthermore, they were more likely to rate the researcher as attractive (Dutton & Aron, 1974). When the person giving out the questionnaire was a male, however, the type of bridge crossed had no impact on sexual imagery. You might be wondering whether the men who crossed the dangerous bridge were simply more adventurous than other men in both bridge crossing and heterosexual encounters. To check this possibility, the researcher repeated the study, but with one change. This time, the woman approached the men farther down the trail, long after arousal from the bridge crossing had subsided. Now the apparently adventurous men were no more likely than others to rate the woman as attractive. So it was probably excitation transfer, not differing amounts of adventurousness, that produced the original result. Schachter focused on the way we interpret our bodily responses to events. Other cognitive theorists have argued that it is our interpretation of events themselves that are most important in shaping emotional experiences. For example, as we mentioned earlier, a person’s emotional reaction to receiving exam results can depend partly on whether the score is seen as a sign of improvement or as a disaster. According to Richard Lazarus’s (1966, 1991) cognitive appraisal theory of emotion, these differing reactions can be best explained by how we think exam scores, job interviews, blind dates, bear sightings, and other events will affect our personal well-being. According to Lazarus, the process of cognitive appraisal, or evaluation, begins when we decide whether or not an event is relevant to our well-being; that is, do we even care about it? If we don’t, as might be the case when an exam doesn’t count toward our grade, we are unlikely to have an emotional experience when we get the results. If the event is relevant to our well-being, we will probably have a significant emotional reaction to it. That reaction will be positive or negative, said Lazarus, depending on whether we interpret the event as advancing our personal goals or blocking our progress. The specific emotion we experience depends on our individual goals, needs, standards, expectations, and past experiences. As a result, a second-place finisher in a marathon race might experience bitter disappointment at having “lost,” whereas someone at the back of the pack may be thrilled just to have completed the race alive (Larsen et al., 2004). “In Review: Theories of Emotion” summarizes key elements of the theories we have discussed. Research on these theories suggests that both bodily responses (including