Comments
Description
Transcript
Stress
Page 264 Black blue 264 HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY However, a meta analysis of writing studies by Smyth (1998) indicated that men may benefit more from writing than women and those who do not naturally talk openly about their emotion may benefit more than those who do. Personality and mood: Pennebaker (1997) also concludes that anxiety, inhibition or constraint do not influence the effectiveness of writing. However, Christensen et al. (1996) concluded that individuals high on hostility scores benefited more from writing than those low on hostility. Use of language: To explain the effectiveness of writing Pennebaker and colleagues (2001) developed a computer programme to analyse the content of what people were writing during the task. They coded the transcripts in terms of the types of words used: negative emotion words (sad, angry), positive emotion words (happy, laugh), causal words (because, reason) and insight words (understand, realize). The results from this analysis showed that greater improvement in health was associated with a high number of positive emotion words and a moderate number of negative emotion words. More interestingly, they also found that those who showed a shift towards more causal and insight words also showed greater improvement (Pennebaker et al. 1997). They concluded from this that this shift in language use reflected a shift from poorly organized descriptions towards a coherent story and that a coherent story was associated with better health status. However, in contrast to this Graybeal et al. (2002) directly assessed story-making and found no relationship with health outcomes. Stress Stress can cause illness through physiological changes such as raised heart rate, blood pressure, heart beat irregularities and an increase in fatty deposits (see above). It can also result in changes in immune function. Research on rats showed that stressors such as tail pinching, a loud noise and electric shocks could produce immunosuppression (Moynihan and Ader 1996). Research in humans shows a similar picture. One area of research which has received much attention relates to the impact of caregiver stress. In an early study, Kiecolt-Glaser et al. (1995) explored differences in wound healing between people who were caring for a person with Alzheimers and a control group. Using a punch biopsy which involves removing a small area of skin and tissue they explored the relationship between caregiver stress and the wound healing process. The results showed that wound healing was slower in the caregivers than the control group. The wound healing paradigm has also been used to show links between stress and slower healing in students during an exam period (Marucha et al. 1998) and slower healing using high resolution ultrasound scanning which is more accurate than the more traditional measurement strategies involving photography (Ebrecht et al. in press). Herbert and Cohen (1993) carried out a meta analysis of 38 studies which had explored the stress–immune system link. They concluded that stress consistently resulted in changes in immune function in terms of proliferative response to mitogens, NK cell activity, and was related to greater numbers of circulating white blood cells, immunoglobulin levels, and antibody titers to herpes viruses. They also concluded that greater changes in immune response were Page 264 Black blue