Comments
Description
Transcript
Hints and answers
31.9 HINTS AND ANSWERS 31.9 Hints and answers 31.1 31.3 31.5 31.7 31.9 Note that the reading of 9.28 m s−2 is clearly in error, and should not be used in the calculation; 9.80 ± 0.02 m s−2 . (a) 55.1. (b) Note that two thirds of the readings lie within ±2 of the mean and that 14 readings are being used. This gives a standard error in the mean ≈ 0.6. (c) Student’s t has a value of about 2.5 for 13 d.o.f. (degrees of freedom), and therefore it is likely at the 3% significance level that the data are in conflict with the accepted value. Plot or calculate a least-squares fit of either x2 versus x/y or xy versus y/x to obtain a ≈ 1.19 and b ≈ 3.4. (a) 0.16; (b) −0.27. Estimate (b) is the more accurate because, using the fact that y(−x) = −y(x), it is effectively obtained by interpolation rather than extrapolation. Recall that, because of the equal proportions of each type, the expected numbers of each type in the first scheme is n. Show that the variance of the estimator for the second scheme is σ 2 /(kn). When calculating that for the first scheme, recall that x2i = µ2i + σ 2 and note that µ2i can be written as (µi − µ + µ)2 . The log-likelihood function is N N N n ln L = ln Cxi + xi ln p + Nn − xi ln(1 − p); i=1 i=1 i=1 n x ∂(n Cx ) ≈ ln − . ∂n n−x 2n(n − x) Ignore the second term on the RHS of the above to obtain N n + N ln(1 − p) = 0. ln n − xi i=1 31.11 31.13 X̄ = 18.0 ± 2.2, Ȳ = 15.0 ± 1.1. σ̂ = 4.92 giving t = 1.21 for 14 d.o.f., and is significant only at the 75% level. Thus there is no significant disagreement between the data and the theory. For the second theory, only the mean values can be tested as Y 2 will not be Gaussian distributed. The difference in the means is Ȳ 2 − π 2 X̄ = 47 ± 36 and is only significantly different from zero at the 82% level. Again the data is consistent with the proposed theory. Consider how many entries may be chosen freely in the table if all row and column totals are to match the observed values. It should be clear that for an m × n table the number of degrees of freedom is (m − 1)(n − 1). (a) In order to make the fractions expressing each preference or lack of preference correct, the expected distribution, if there were no correlation, must be Classical 17.5 24.5 28 Mathematics None English None 10 14 16 Pop 22.5 31.5 36 This gives a χ2 of 12.3 for four d.o.f., making it less than 2% likely, that no correlation exists. (b) The expected distribution, if there were no correlation, is Academic preference No academic preference Music preference 104 56 1303 No music preference 26 14 STATISTICS This gives a χ2 of 1.2 for one d.o.f and no evidence for the claim. 31.15 As the distribution at each value of s is Poisson, the best estimate of the √ measurement error is the square root of the number of counts, i.e. n(s). Linear regression gives a = 4.3 ± 2.1 and b = 10.06 ± 0.94. (a) The cosmic ray background must be present, since n(0) = 0 but its value of about 4 is uncertain to within a factor 2. (b) The correlation coefficient between a and b is −0.63. Yes; if a were reduced towards zero then b would have to be increased to compensate. (c) Yes, χ2 = 4.9 for five d.o.f., which is almost exactly the ‘expected’ value, neither too good nor too bad. 31.17 31.19 a1 = 2.02 ± 0.06, a2 = −2.99 ± 0.09, a3 = 4.90 ± 0.10; r12 = −0.60. Note that |dF| = |dF /F 2 | and write N1 − 1 N1 − 1 (N2 − 1)F . 1+ as 1 + (N2 − 1)F (N2 − 1)F N1 − 1 1304