Comments
Description
Transcript
Using the TRA and TPB
Page 143 Black blue EATING BEHAVIOUR 143 I Much of the research carried out within this perspective has taken place within the laboratory as a means to provide a controlled environment. Although this methodology enables alternative explanations to be excluded, the extent to which the results would generalize to a more naturalistic setting remains unclear. I A developmental model explores the meaning of food in terms of food as a reward, food as a means to gain a reward, food as status, food as pleasant and food as aversive. However, food has a much more diverse set of meanings which are not incorporated into this model. For example, food can mean power, sexuality, religion and culture. Such complex meanings are not incorporated into a developmental perspective. I Once eaten, food is incorporated into the body and can change body size. This is also loaded with a complex set of meanings such as attractiveness, control, lethargy and success. A developmental model does not address the meanings of the body. I A developmental model includes a role for cognitions as some of the meanings of food including reward and aversion are considered to motivate behaviour. These cognitions remain implicit, however, and are not explicitly described. In sum, developmental models of eating behaviour highlight a central role for learning. From this perspective, eating behaviour is influenced by exposure which can reduce neophobia, social learning through the observation of important others and associative learning as food cues can be paired with aspects of the environment and the physiological consequences of eating. COGNITIVE MODELS OF EATING BEHAVIOUR A cognitive approach to eating behaviour focuses on an individual’s cognitions and has explored the extent to which cognitions predict and explain behaviour. Some research has highlighted a weak link between health locus of control and dietary behaviour (e.g. Bennet et al. 1995). Similarly, one large scale study of dietary practice across Europe reported an association between beliefs about the importance of specific dietary practices and the implementation of these practices (Wardle et al. 1997). Most research using cognitive approach has, however, drawn upon social cognition models. These models have been applied to eating behaviour both as a means to predict eating behaviour and as central to interventions to change eating behaviour. This chapter will focus on research using the TRA and TPB as these have most commonly been applied to aspects of eating behaviour (see Chapter 2 for details). Using the TRA and TPB Some research using a social cognitive approach to eating behaviour has focused on predicting the intentions to consume specific foods. For example, research has explored the extent to which cognitions relate to the intentions to eat biscuits and wholemeal bread (Sparks et al. 1992), skimmed milk (Raats et al. 1995) and organic vegetables (Sparks and Shepherd 1992). Much research suggests that behavioural intentions are Page 143 Black blue