Comments
Description
Transcript
Projective Personality Tests
446 FIGURE Chapter 11 Personality 11.6 The Rorschach Inkblot Test People taking the Rorschach test are shown ten patterns by similar to this one and asked to tell what the blot looks like, and why. Try jotting down what you see in the blot, and why, and then compare your responses to those of some friends. Most methods of scoring this test focus on (1) what part of the blot the person responds to; (2) what details, colors, or other features determine each response; (3) the content of responses (such as seeing animals, maps, or body parts); and (4) the popularity or commonness of the responses. doing 2 learn people with whom the respondent’s results are compared. So although an MMPI profile might look like that of someone with a mental disorder, the profile might actually reflect the culture-specific way the person interpreted the test items, not a psychological problem (Groth-Marnat, 1997). Even though the MMPI-2 uses comparison norms that represent a more culturally diverse population than did those of the original MMPI, psychologists must still be cautious when interpreting the profiles of people who identify with minority subcultures (Butcher, 2004.) Projective Personality Tests projective personality tests Personality tests made up of relatively unstructured stimuli in which responses are seen as reflecting the individuals’ unconscious needs, fantasies, conflicts, thought patterns, and other aspects of personality. Unlike objective tests, projective personality tests contain items or tasks that are ambiguous, meaning that they can be perceived in many different ways. People taking projective tests might be asked to draw a house, a person, a family, or a tree; to fill in the missing parts of incomplete pictures or sentences; to say what they associate with particular words; or to report what they see in a drawing or picture. Projective techniques are sometimes employed in personality research, but they are far more popular among clinical psychologists, who use them in the assessment of psychological disorders (Wood et al., 2003) These psychologists tend to take a psychodynamic approach to their work. They believe that people’s responses to these tests are guided by unconscious needs, motives, fantasies, conflicts, thoughts, and other hidden aspects of personality. One prominent projective test, called the Thematic Apperception Test, or TAT, is described in the motivation and emotion chapter as a measure of need for achievement. Henry Murray and Christina Morgan developed this test to assess the needs they saw as the basis of personality. Another well-known projective test, the Rorschach Inkblot Test, features a series of ten inkblots similar to the one in Figure 11.6. The respondent is asked to tell what the blot might be and then to explain why. Those who support projective testing claim that using ambiguous test items makes it difficult for respondents to detect what is being measured and what the “best” answers would be. They argue, therefore, that these tests can measure aggressive and sexual impulses and other personality features that people might be able to hide on an objective test. The tests’ supporters also point to specific instances, such as in studies assessing achievement motivation with the TAT, in which projective tests show acceptable reliability and validity (Grønnerød, 2003; Schultheiss & Rohde, 2002).