Comments
Description
Transcript
孜Z ZⅥ カシve ノZナ ハー軽 ノZナ 孜Z ZⅥ ] ケチ チ
̵έΫϩ߮ζইϞϪωϥΧ cÔ£cZ¬Ì¬ve ¹ZÆqÃZ¼¹ÂµZ Ê°y¶¼veÉZÅyZ ZY]¹ÁÁ{¹|À³Äf§ÌaÉZÅ`Ìe¿Ê]ZËY É|¼v»ZÁ§{Z§Ä·Yc,Z¯ZyºÌ¿ ,ÃZ¿Z»¯ÉYÃZ´¿Y{ÉÁZ¯Ã|°¿Y{cZeZ^¿sÔYÁdYÃÁ³{ZfYÁÉf¯{ÉÂn¿Y{\ÌeeÄ]Á ÃZ¿Z»¯{ÁYÃZ´fËY,¯ºË{ÉÁZ¯cZ¬Ì¬veÄ ÃZ¿Z»¯{ÁYÃZ´fËY,¯ºË{ÉÁZ¯cZ¬Ì¬veÄ R»d¿ÁZ »ZË{ZfY Ë~axËZed§ZË{xËZe Ã|Ì°q `Ìe¿,¹ÁÁ{¹|À³{Ê°yÀeÄ]¶¼vf»ÉZÅ`Ìe¿ ÊËZZÀÁÊ°y¶¼veÉZÅyZÊ]ÂÀ»Ä] { ½Z¿¹|À³|ÅZÉY{º«Á ¹ÁÁ{¹|À³ÉZÅ|ÅZÊmZÁ{¹Z«Y ,|ÅZ ÃY¼ÅÄ]¹ÁÁ{¹|À³Äf§Ìa Ä»d¿ÁZ »{µZ{ʸ̼°eÉZÌ]MÁºË{ËYÁ{{Y°eÄZ]ʧ{Ze¶»Z¯ÉZŸ] s\·Z« ʼ¯ÉZÅyZʸ̼°eÉZÌ]MÁºË{{°¸¼ÉZÀ^»]|Àf§³Y«ËZ»M{»{ÁY¯ºË{ÉÁZ¯ÊeZ¬Ì¬ve dÌZuyZ,®Ì¿Â»Zž̴¿ZÌ»,ÉÁÃÆ] Ê|Àž̴¿ZÌ»,¶¼veyZ,ÉÁÃÆ] ¾Ì´¿ZÌ»¶Ì^«YÊ°yÄ]¶¼ve ,,,ÃZ¼ ÉZÅ`Ìe¿ |¿|Ä^Zv»{°¸¼ÉY|ËZa yZÁ{°¸¼yZ,Àe¶¼veyZ ,ÀeÄ] Ä]¶¼veÁ®Ì¿Â»Zž̴¿ZÌ»,ÉÁÃÆ] Ê|Àž̴¿ZÌ»,ÉÁÃÆ] ¾Ì´¿ZÌ»ÉZÅyZY|¬»¾ËeÓZ]ÉYY{ÁÊmZ ÁÀeÄ]dZuÉZÅ yZY|¬»¾Ëf¼¯Z] Á ,{ ,ÃZ¼ ÉZÅ`Ìe¿ į Ê·Zu{|¿{Â] Àe cÁZn»{ Á , ÃZ¼ ÉZÅ`Ìe¿ į{Y{½Z¿cÔaÉZ] ÄËne|¿{Â] Éf¼¯Ê°yÄ]dÌZu ÉYY{ ¶¼ve Y« Àe Ä] ¶¼ve Á ®Ì¿Â»ZÅ ¾Ì´¿ZÌ» ,ÉÁÃÆ] Ê|ÀÅ ¾Ì´¿ZÌ» ,ÉÁÃÆ] ¾Ì´¿ZÌ» ÉZÅ yZ Ä] Â]» ÉZÅY{] ¾Ì]Yį{Y{½Z¿Ê]¾ËYY¶ZulËZf¿É|À]¼ |¿|ÊËZZÀÊ°yÄ]¶¼vf»ÉZÅ`Ìe¿ ¾Ì]Yį{Y{½Z¿Ê]¾ËYY¶ZulËZf¿É|À]¼m ½YÂÀÄ]Á|Àf§³ |¿{Â]Ê°yÄ]¶¼vf»ÉZÅ`Ìe¿ Á,ÃZ¼ÉZÅ`Ìe¿ Ä ·Z»{»ÉZÅ`Ìe¿ ¹ÁÁ{¹|À³,Ä¿Y{{°¸¼,Ê°y¶¼veÉZÅyZ,Ê°yÀeÉ|̸¯ÉZÅÃYÁ [email protected]µÂX»Ã|ÀË¿ Ê°y¶¼veÉZÅyZ ZY]¹ÁÁ{¹|À³Äf§ÌaÉZÅ`Ìe¿Ê]ZËY½YZ°¼ÅÁZ¯Zy Á ̧ Âe SSI=Stress Susceptibility Index ZÆYÁ|{ZÆÀÌa Fisher and Maure, 1978 » d»ÁZ¬»Ã|ÀÅ{½Z¿®ËYf¼¯ SSIY|¬»Ä¯|ÀfY{ Äq Å yZ ¾ËY ZY ] dY Ê°y Ä] `Ìe¿ ½Á|]ËY{{°¸¼Ä]ÀeËY{{°¸¼Y|¬» dYf¼¯Ê°yÄ]º«dÌZu|Z] e®Ë{¿Àe |¿ÂÊ » À˳ yZ ¾ËY Âe į ÊËZÅ`Ìe¿ ZŽM {°¸¼ÀeËY{Z»Y|¿Y{ʼ¯Ã¬·Z]{°¸¼ ÓZ]{°¸¼Z]½ZÅZ̳|¿YÂeÊ »¬§yZ¾ËYdY{ZË Ê]Zzf¿Y ÉZÅ`Ìe¿ Á |À¯ [Zzf¿Y Y Àe Ìv» { ¾ËYÁdY{|ÀÅYÂz¿Àe½Á|]Ìv»{Ê]ÂyÅZe ¶¼ve yZ dY Ã| {YÁ ½M ] į {Â] É{YËY Âf» ÉÁÃÆ] yZ Á TOL=Tolerance µ{Z » \Ìee Ä] į MP=Mean Productivity ¾Ì´¿ZÌ» Á Àe ½Á|] Á Àe Ìv» {°¸¼ ¥ÔfyY Âe |ÀfÅ Àe ½Á|] Á Àe Ìv» Á{ { {°¸¼ Rosielle and Hamblin, 1981 ¾Ì¸^»ZÅ Á ¶ÌÁ {»ÁY|]YÀe]Y]{ZÅ`Ìe¿¶¼veÊ]ZËYÉY] ½Z¿ ¶¼ve yZ ÉÓZ] Ë{Z¬» d§³ Y« Ã{Z¨fY yZ dY Àe Ä] ZÅ`Ìe¿ Ê^¿ dÌZu Ã|ÀÅ{ É^m ¼m Âf» c Ä] Ì¿ Âf» ÉÁÃÆ] ¦Ë eÀe½Á|]ÁÀeËY{`Ìe¿®Ë{°¸¼ STI=Stress Àe ¶¼ve yZ |¿Z¿§ {ÂÊ » À˳ ÉY] ÉZÌ » ½YÂÀ Ä] Y Tolerance Index {¼¿ {ZÆÀÌa Ê°y Àe Ä] ¶¼vf» ¹Z«Y ½Z¿ yZ ¾ËY ÉÓZ] Ë{Z¬» Fernandez, 1992 {ÉÁdYÓZ]ì·Z]{°¸¼ÁÀe{Z˶¼veÃ|ÀÅ{ Àe½Á|]ÁÀeÌv»Á{{ZÅ`Ìe¿ {°¸¼Ê] ¦·Y {¼¿ ºÌ¬e ÃÁ³ ZÆq Ä] Y ½ZÅZ̳ À¯YÁ {°¸¼ ÉYY{ Ìv» Á{ Å { į A ÃÁ³ ÉZÅ`Ìe¿ ÊËÓZ]{°¸¼Ä¯ BÃÁ³ ÉZÅ`Ìe¿ [|ÀfÅÊËÓZ] į C ÃÁ³ ÉZÅ`Ìe¿ k |¿Y{ Àe ½Á|] Ìv» { ÃÁ³ ÉZÅ`Ìe¿ {|¿Y{ÀeÌv»{Ê]Ây{°¸¼ yZ |¿Y{ Ìv» Á{ Å { ÊÀÌËZa {°¸¼ į D GMP=Genomic Mean ÉÁÃÆ] Ê|ÀÅ ¾Ì´¿ZÌ» Fernandez, 1992 |¿Z¿§ Âe Productivity {ZÆÀÌaÊ°yÀeÄ]¶¼vf»ÉZÅ`Ìe¿ Ê]ZËYÉY] ®Ì°¨e{Âf»ÉÁÃÆ] Z]ÄËZ¬»{yZ¾ËY| Ä»|¬» {¾ÌXeÁaÁÉ¿Y¾Ì»PeÃ|ÄfyZÀ]ZÀ»YÊ°Ë Triticum Ê¿ÁZ¯Z» ¹|À³ ZË ¹ÁÁ{ ¹|À³ ½ZÆm ¹|À³ |Z]Ê » turgidum L. subsp. Durum Desf {ÂÊ »d¯ZÌ¿{Ìy¹|À³ ÊuY¿ |{ {¹ÁÁ{ {Ã| d¯¹ÁÁ{¹|À³YZf°Å½Â̸̻ YÌ] cYuÄm{Áʳ|¿Z]ËYdveÉYÄ¿YfË|»ÊuY¿ ZŵZ¹Z¼e{Yʳ]ÁÊÀÌ]Ìa¶]Z«Ì£cYÌ̤e Z]¹ÁÁ{¹|À³Nachitet al., 1998 |¿{Y{½Z¿ Ê¿ZÆm|Ì·Âe½YÌ»ÉYY{d¯ËtZf°Å½Â̸̻ {¾e Ê¿ZÆm{°¸¼Âf»Á¾e½Â̸̻ » µZ { Zf°Å ¹|À³ USDA, 2009 |Z]Ê ZŹ|À³ ËZÁ½Z¿¹|À³Ê·Â¼ »¹|À³ Ä]d^¿¹ÁÁ{ e¹ÁZ¬» Ê°y 0ZÂy ÊËYÂÅ Á [M |Z»Z¿ ËY Ä] dYeZ³Z®yļ̿ÊËYÂÅÁ[MËYZ]ÁdY Ì£ÁÃ|¿ ÉZÅÀe ļÅÄq³YSrivastava, 1984 Z»Y |¿ÂÊ » [Âv» |Ì·Âe ÅZ¯ ºÆ» ¶»Y Y Ã|¿ {°¸¼] įdYÉYÃ|¿Ì£ ¶»Z ¾ËeºÆ»Ê°y [MÄ]Êf{ Arauset al., 2002 {Y{ ÌiPe¹|À³ Ê°y |ÀËM§ Á dY {Á|v» ½ZÆm Z¬¿ Y ÉZÌ] { ÊÌv»Àe ¾ËeËZ´Ë{ÊÌv»¶»ZÅYfÌ] ºË{ ÉZÅÌ v» ÊY Äyq Y Ê¿Z» Å { į dY ¿ Ä] Rajaram et al., 1996 |f¨Ì] ©Z¨eY |¿YÂeÊ » dve ÉZÅÌ v» { ZÅ`Ìe¿ Ê^¿ {°¸¼ |Ê » { ÊÁ Ĭ¿ [¸» ËY Á Ê°y Àe ËY ¶]Z« Ì£ ºË{ ËY ÉY] [¸» ÉZÅ`Ìe¿ ÊËZZÀ ¶Ì¿Zfa į {Y{ {ÂmÁ ª§YÂe ¾ËY |Z] ÊÀÌ] Ìa į Ê·Zu{dY|À»{ºËÔ»ÀedveÓZ]{°¸¼ ÓZ] Ê°y ¶¼ve Á º¯ {°¸¼ ¶Ì¿Zfa Z] ÊËZÅ`Ìe¿ |ÀZ]Ê » |À»{ dY |Ë| Àe į Ê»Z´ÀÅ 0ÓZ¼fuY Voltas et al. Panthuwan et al., 2002 À¯YÁ Ê]ZËY ÉY] ʨ¸fz» ÉZÅÁ ½ÂÀ¯ Ze {» Á Ã| Y|]Y ZÅÀe Y¿Y Ä] d^¿ ÊY ½ZÅZ̳ ʨ¸fz» ÉZÅ yZ Á Äf§³ Y« ½Y³{Y¿Ä] Ã{Z¨fY ÁÀeËYdve¾Ì »`Ìe¿®ËZf§tËeÉY] Ì¿\ZÀ»[Zzf¿YyZdYÃ|{ZÆÀÌaÀeÌ£ Á{Å{YÓZ]{°¸¼Z]ÊËZÅ`Ìe¿ įdYÊyZ |À¯ËZ¼f»ZÅ`Ìe¿ËZYÀe½Á|]ÁÀeËY Àe Ä] dÌZu yZ Fernandez, 1992 ¹ZÆqÃZ¼¹ÂµZcÔ£cZ¬Ì¬ve |Àf§ZË{ Á Ã{Y{ Y« Ê] {» Ê°y ¶¼ve Ê]ZËY Ê|ÀÅ ¾Ì´¿ZÌ» ,Àe Ä] dÌZu ÉZÅ yZ į ÉY] ZÅyZ ¾Ëe\ZÀ» Àe ¶¼ve Á ÉÁÃÆ] Àe½Á|]ÁÀeËYÁ{Å{¹ÁZ¬»¹Z«YÊËZZÀ Yahoueian et al., ½YZ°¼Å Á ½ZÌËÂÅZË |ÀfÅ Á ÉÁÃÆ] Ê|ÀÅ ¾Ì´¿ZÌ» ÉZÅ yZ Ì¿ 2006 e] ÉZÅ yZ ½YÂÀ Ä] Y Ê°y Ä] ¶¼ve yZ ½YZ°¼ÅÁÉ|¼v»ÂeįÉYÄ ·Z»{|¿{¯Ê§ » z» d§³ ¹Zn¿Y ¹ÁÁ{ ¹|À³ ÉZÅ`Ìe¿ ÉÁ ] Á Âf» ÉÁÃÆ] ,Àe ¶¼ve ÉZÅ yZ į |Ë{³ Z]ÊËZÅ`Ì e¿ÊËZZÀÄ]{Z«ÉÁÃÆ] Ê|Àž̴¿ZÌ» Ê»Z´ÀÅÀe½Á|]ÁÀeËYÁ{Å{ÓZ]{°¸¼ Âf»ÉÁÃÆ] yZÁ|ÀfÅ,dYÂf»Àeį ÉZÅ`Ìe¿ [Zzf¿Y ÉY] yZ ¾Ëe\ZÀ» ½YÂÀ Ä] | ÊËZZÀ Âf» Àe ËY Ä] Z³Z ½YZ°¼Å Á Ê^·Z Mohammadi et al., 2010 ¹|À³ÉZžËÓÉÁÄ ·Z»Z]Ì¿Talebi et al, 2009 ¾Ì´¿ZÌ» ÉZÅyZ į |¿|Ì ÄnÌf¿ ¾]Y Ä] ¹ÁÁ{ ¶¼ve yZ Á Âf» ÉÁÃÆ] ,ÉÁÃÆ] Ê|ÀÅ ÉZÅ ¾ËÓ ÊËZZÀ ÉY] Ê]¸» ÉZÅ yZ Ê°y ZY ] |ÀfÅ Àe ½Á|] Á Àe ËY dve ¹|À³ { Falahi et al., 2011 ½YZ°¼ÅÁÊuÔ§ ÉZÅÄf§ZË ¹ÁÁ{ ¹|À³ ÉZÅ ¾ËÓ Ê°y Àe ¶¼ve Ê]ZËY µZ]£ ÉY] ZÅyZ ¾Ëe\ZÀ» į |Ë{³ z» ÉZÅ yZÀe½Á|]ÁÀeËY{ZÅ ¾ËÓ½{¯ Ê|ÀÅ ¾Ì´¿ZÌ» ,Ê°y Ä] ¶¼ve ,Âf» ÉÁÃÆ] Á Ê Ä ·Z» { |ÀfÅ ®Ì¿Â»ZÅ ¾Ì´¿ZÌ» Á ÉÁÃÆ] {°¸¼¶«Y|u eÓZ] YSIZ]Ê»Z«Y½YZ°¼ÅÁÃ{»Ä ËY{Y{°¸¼¾ËeÓZ]ÁÀe ½Á|]ËY{Y Siosehmardeh et al., 2006|¿{Y{½Z¿Àe ½ZÅZ̳ | Ã|ÀÀ¯ {Á|v» ¶»Z ¾ËeºÆ» 0ÓÂY Á®yÊuY¿{½YËYÊYYfÌ]|Z]Ê »[M{Â^¼¯ įÊËZÅ`Ìe¿ ¾ÌÌ e¾ËY]ZÀ]Á|¿YÃ|«YÁ®yļ̿ ¶]Z« 0Zf^¿ {°¸¼ ÄWYY Ä] {Z« Ê]M º¯ ËY dve 0DWVXR dY ÉÁ É»Y ,|ÀZ] Ê·Â^« YÅÄ·ZŽYËY{Islami et al., 2004 {Á|uį{Y{ZfyY¹ÁÁ{¹|À³dZ¯Ä]Zf°Å ¹|À³dZ¯ ªZÀ»j¯YÁdYºË{cÂÄ]½M |{ Ã|«YÁ¯µ|f »ÁÌ»³Ä¼Ì¿ªZÀ»{¹ÁÁ{ ¾ÌÀr¼Å dY Y{Ây] ÉeÓZ] c|« Y ZÅ`Ìe¿ ¹Z¿ Ä] Y É´Ë{ yZ Fernandez, 1992 |¿Z¿§ ÄWYY HAM=Harmonic Mean ®Ì¿Â»ZÅ ¾Ì´¿ZÌ» {» Àe ËY { ZÅ`Ìe¿ [Zzf¿Y ÉY] į {Y{ {°¸¼ ÉY|ËZa yZ {Ì³Ê » Y« Ã{Z¨fY Á Z»ÔÂ] Âe YSI=Yield Stability Index ½YÂÀÄ]Bouslama and Schapaugh, 1984ZaZ Ä] ¹ÁZ¬» ÉZÅ`Ìe¿ ÊËZZÀ ÉY] Ê^ZÀ» yZ ÀeËY{{°¸¼yZ¾ËY|{ZÆÀÌaÊ°y |À¯Ê »Ê]ZËY½MÀeÌ£{°¸¼Ä]Äf]YÁYº«®Ë Zf¿Y eÓZ] {°¸¼ ÉY|ËZa yZ Z] Ê»Z«Y ¾ËY]ZÀ] {°¸¼ Àe ½Á|] Á Àe ËY Á{ Å { į {ÁÊ » YI=Yield {°¸¼ yZ |ÀZ] ÄfY{ ÉeÓZ] É|À] Ä^e Àe {°¸¼ ZY ] ¬§ Y ¹Z«Y index Á{ Å { ÓZ] {°¸¼ Z] ÉZÅ`Ìe¿ ¾ËY]ZÀ] |À¯Ê » |Å{Ê ¼¿ Ìze Y Àe ½Á|] Á Àe ËY ½YZ°¼Å Á ZÌ¿ÉË Siosehmardeh et al., 2006 Á ÊÂÀ» ¹Z«Y Ê] Z] Azizinia et al., 2005 į {Y{ ½Z¿ Àe ½Á|] Á Àe ËY { ¹|À³ Ê»Â] Á Ê|ÀÅ ¾Ì´¿ZÌ» ,ÉÁÃÆ] ¾Ì´¿ZÌ» ÉZÅ yZ ÉZÅyZ ¾ËfÆ] ½YÂÀ Ä] Ê°y ¶¼ve yZ ÉYY{ Á ¶¼vf» ¹Z«Y [Zzf¿Y ÉY] Ê°y Ä] d»ÁZ¬» Khezri ½YZ°¼ÅÁÉÁY¨Éy|Z]Ê »ÓZ]{°¸¼ ¹Z«YYÉ{Y| eÊ]ÂÀ»Ä]Afravi et al., 2010 ,®Ë·ÂÀ§cZ¨Êy]¿Y¹ÁÁ{¹|À³ÉZneÁÊ»Â] Ê°y Ä] d»ÁZ¬» Z] ^e» ®Ë·§» Á ®Ë·ÂȨ̈ yZ į |¿{Y{ ½Z¿ µZ»¿ Á Ê]M Àe ËY dve ¾Ì´¿ZÌ» ,Âf» ÉÁÃÆ] ,®Ì¿Â»ZÅ ¾Ì´¿ZÌ» ÉZÅ ZÌ]Ád^j»Ê´f^¼ÅÊ°y¶¼veyZÁÊ|ÀÅ Ä]Á|¿Y{Àe½Á|]ÁÀeËY{{°¸¼Z]ÊËÓZ] Á Ê|¬» |¿| ÊËZZÀ ZÅyZ ¾ËfÆ] ½YÂÀ Ê]ZËYÂÀ»Ä] Moghadasi et al., 2009 ½YZ°¼Å ¹|À³ÉZÅ ¾ËӮ˷§»cZ¨Êy]ÁÄ¿Y{{°¸¼ ¾Ì´¿ZÌ»,Àe¶¼veÉZÅ yZ į|¿{Y{½Z¿¹ÁÁ{ Z]ÊËÓZ]Ê´f^¼ÅÂf» ÉÁÃÆ] Á ÉÁÃÆ] Ê|ÀÅ ¾ËY]ZÀ]|¿Y{Àe½Á|]ÁÀeËYdveÄ¿Y{{°¸¼ ¶¼vf»ÉZÅ ¾ËÓÀ˳ÉY] ZÅyZ ¾ËYY ½YÂeÊ » Hatim et ½YZ°¼ÅÁºÌu{¼¿Ã{Z¨fYÊ°yÄ] ÉY] Y½Z¿¹|À³¦¸fz» ÉZÅ ¾ËÓ Á¹Z«Y al., 2008 Ê°y¶¼veÉZÅyZ ZY]¹ÁÁ{¹|À³Äf§ÌaÉZÅ`Ìe¿Ê]ZËY½YZ°¼ÅÁZ¯Zy ÉY] Ì¿ ÉY{ |ÅZ º« Y ºË{ cZ¬Ì¬ve Ä» º« ½Z¿ ¹|À³ {ÂÊ » Ã{Z¨fY ¹ÁÁ{ ¹|À³ sÔY ʼË|« ZÌ] ÊuÔY Ĭ]Z į dY Ê»Z«Y Y ÉY{ Á [Zzf¿Y ¯ [£ Ê»Â] ÉZÅ Ã{Âe ¾Ì] Y Á ÄfY{ {d¯{»½Z¿¹|À³º«¾ËeºÆ»ÁdYÃ|ʧ » Sadeghzadeh dY ¯ ºË{ Ì{ ªZÀ» Ahari, 2006 Z]ʧ{Ze¶»Z¯ ÉZŸ] s\·Z«{ ËZ»M ÃZ´fËY { ʸ̼°e ÉZÌ]M Á ºË{ ËY Á{ { Y°e ÃZ¿Z»¯{«YÁ{ÁY¯ºË{ÉÁZ¯cZ¬Ì¬ve ÊËZ̧Y¤mµÂ,Ĭ̫{ÁÄm{ÊËZ̧Y¤mZ] ,ZË{ t Y f» Z¨eY ,Ĭ̫{ Á Äm{ d§Z] Á f» ʸ̻ Ä¿ZÌ·Z Âf» ʳ|¿Z] ½YÌ» |YmY ÊYµZ{Ê Ê»Â· Zy ¯ºË{ÉÁZ¯cZ¬Ì¬veÃZ´fËYÊËYÂÅÁ[MËY Ã|»M µÁ|m{ ÊYµZ{{ÁY Âf» µZ ÊZÀYÂÅ Z»M ª]Z» dY ÃZ»{Y{y{{Y³Ê f¿ZÄm{ª¸»ÉZ»{¾ËeÓZ] ]Y]ÃZ»¾¼Æ]{ª¸»ÉZ»{ ¾Ëe¾ÌË ZaÂf»Á yYÁY¶§yYÁY{Z»{ËY§Y dY {Y³Ê f¿ZÄm{ « Z] 0Ó¼ » į ĬÀ» ¾ËY { ÃZ» Ìe Ze dÆ^Ë{Y ÄmY»ʰyÀeZ]YºË{dYdYÃY¼Åʳ|¿Z] ¹Ó ËY ½{ÁM ºÅY§ ÂÀ» Ä] ¾ÌÀr¼Å {ZÊ » Ŀ³ pÌÅ Y ºË{ d¯ { Ê°y Àe µZ¼Y ÉY] ÉZŽYZ] Ä] Z°eY Z] ZÆÀe d¯ Á |Ë{´¿ Ã{Z¨fY ÉZÌ]M ĸu»½ÂqºË{ËY{¾ËY]ZÀ]|¹Zn¿YÌËZa¶§ ÊËZÆf¿Y ÉZÅÀe Z] ÃZ̳ ®Ë·ÂȨ̈ ½|Ì Ze ÊÅ|¸³ {{ÂÊ »ÄmY»{°¸¼d§YZ]ÃZ̳ adY¥{Z» Z] ¥{Z» į ÃZ̳ ÊËZÆf¿Y Àe ĸu» { Ê]M d¯ dY ®Ë·ÂȨ̈½|ÌZe ĸ^ÀÂÆ ÊÅ|¸³Ä¸u» ½YÌ» Ä]ĸu»Å Áʸ̼°eÉZÌ]Mĸu»Á{Ä]¹Y|«Y { ¾ËY]ZÀ] |Ë{³ Ê¿YZ] ÉZÌ]M Á Ä] f»Ê¸Ì» { ÉZÌ]M Z] ÃZ̳ {°¸¼ d§Y ʸ̼°e ÉZÌ]M ËY Z] ÃZ̳ Á {ÂÊ » ½Y^m ʳ|Ì Á ÊÅ|¸³ ĸu» {ÂÊ ¼¿ÄmY»ÊËZÆf¿YÉZÅÀe Êf{cÂÄ]µZ½Z]M¶ËYÁY{~]dZ¯ Z] d¯ ¦Ë{ ¶»Z ÊËZ»M |uYÁ Å Á | ¹Zn¿Y µÂÁºË{ËY{f» µÂÁf»Êf¿Z ĸZ§ dZ¯ º¯Ye Z] ʸ̼°e ÉZÌ]M ËY { f» Ministry of Jehad-E-Agriculture, 1997 dY ¹|À³d¯Ët¾ËfÌ]į¾ËYÄ]ÄmÂeZ]¾ËY]ZÀ] ÅÁa¾ËYY¥|ŽYÂeÊ »|Z]Ê »ºË{ÊuY¿{¹ÁÁ{ ¿ Y ¹ÁÁ{ ¹|À³ ÉZÅ`Ìe¿ Ê°Ìf¿ ÂÀe Ê]ZËY Y ¶¼ve ÉZÅ yZ ¾Ëe\ZÀ» [Zzf¿Y ,Ê°y ¶¼ve Ê°y Àe Ä] ¶¼vf» ÉZÅ`Ìe ¿ ÊËZZÀ Á Ê°y {¯½YÂÀ ZÅÁ Á{Y» Á Àe ¶¼ve ÉZÅ yZ Ê] ÂÀ» Ä] {Ê°yÀeËYÄ]¶¼vf» ÉZÅ`Ìe¿ ÊËZZÀ º« ,¹ÁÁ{¹|À³Äf§Ìa`Ìe¿ Y ,¹ÁÁ{¹|À³ º«®ËÁ ÊmZÁ{|ÅZ½YÂÀÄ]¹ÁÁ{¹|À³ ÉZÅ`Ìe¿ | Ã{Z¨fY ÉY{ ½Z¿ ¹|À³ |ÅZ «YÁ{ªÌ¬ve¾ËY{Ê]{» ¹ÁÁ{¹|À³Äf§Ìa ÊuÔYÉZÅÄ»Z¿]{į|ÀfÅÊuÔY{Y»YÊWm ÉY] {ÁY ¯ ºË{ ÉÁZ¯ cZ¬Ì¬ve Ä» [Zzf¿Y ªÌ¬ve¾ËYÉY]ÁÃ{Â]Ê]dveºË{ËY { µ|f » ªZÀ» { Ê»Â] ¹Z«Y Y { º« |¿| {Y{²¿Ä]Ê^¿d»ÁZ¬»ÁdYÃZ¿Z»¯½ZfY½YËY ÉY{ º« Y Éf¼¯ {°¸¼ į dY Ê·Zu { ¾ËY {ÂÊ »d¯0Z ]{Á|v»ZÌ]t{¾ËY]ZÀ]ÄfY{ Ä» d¿ÁZ » Âe µZ { ÊmZ º« \ZÀ» º« ¾ËY |Ë{³ ʧ » ºË{ ÉÁZ¯ cZ¬Ì¬ve ËYÉY]¹³µ|f »Á{µ|f »ªZÀ»{d¯ ÉYY{ Ä¿Y{ {°¸¼ ¿ Y Á Ã{Â] ʸ̼°e ÉZÌ]M Á ºË{ ¾ËY|Z]Ê »ÉY{Á{¹Z«YZ]ÉÌ´¼q¥ÔfyY ,[Âyd̨̯,fÌ]|Ì·Âe¶Ì¿Zfa¾fY{¶Ì·{Ä]º« d»ÁZ¬» Á ʳ|Ì]YÂy Ä] d»ÁZ¬» ,Ê°y Àe Ä] ¶¼ve dZ¯Áʧ »ÉY]®ÅZÌÁ²¿ZÅÉZ¼Ì ]¶]Z¬»{ ÉZź̸«Y ½YZ]a ªZÀ» Á ʸ̼°e ÉZÌ]M ËY { ÁÉ|¼v»|Ë{³[Zzf¿YºË{¹³µ|f »Á{ªZÀ» ʧ » Á e] ¹ÁÁ{ ÉZŹ|À³ ʧ » ,½YZ°¼Å Z]ÁÃ{Â]½Z¿MÂe½MË~a¹¸f»½YÁZ¯Ä]½M ¹|À³Z]YÃ|ʧ » ÉZŹ|À³ ½YÁZ¯Ä°ÀËYÄ] ÄmÂe {µ|f »ªZÀ»{Á|ÀÀ¯Ê »ÄËZ¬»ÉY{º«½Z¿ Ä̬]YeµÂv»aÉY{º«½Z¿¹|À³ÃZ¿Z»¯¶j» ¹|À³ Ä] d^¿ ¹ÁÁ{ ÉZŹ|À³ dËZ]Ê » ,dY ¹Z«Y É{Y¿ Ä] ÉZÅ Ä»Z¿] { Y~· |Z] ÄfY{ Ée] ÉY{ ¹ZÆqÃZ¼¹ÂµZcÔ£cZ¬Ì¬ve Ä ·Z»{»ÉZÅ`Ìe¿ʳËÁ µÁ|m Table 1. The characteristic of studied genotypes ¹Z¿|¯ PÀ» `Ìe¿ÃZ¼ ¹Z¿|¯ Code/Name Origin* Genotype No. Code/Name Origin 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ADYT106-1-1D ADYT106-4-1D ADYT106-15-1D ADYT106-18-1D ADYT106-20-1D ADYT206-1-1D ADYT206-4-1D ADYT206-3-1D ADYT206-5-1D ADYT206-9-1D DARSI DARSI DARSI DARSI DARSI DARSI DARSI DARSI DARSI DARSI 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 ADYT206-18-1D ADYT206-20-1D ADYT306-4-1D ADYT306-5-1D ADYT306-9-1D ADYT306-10-1D ADYT306-13-1D ADYT306-14-1D Saji Zardak DARSI DARSI DARSI DARSI DARSI DARSI DARSI DARSI DARSI DARSI 11 12 ADYT206-11-1D ADYT206-15-1D DARSI DARSI 23 Sardari DARSI `Ìe¿ÃZ¼ Genotype No. * PÀ» * DARSI= Dryland Agricultural Research Sub-Institute ÊYµZ{{ÁYºË{ÉÁZ¯cZ¬Ì¬veÃZ´fËYÊZÀYÂÅZ»MµÁ|m Table 2. Meteorological details in Dray land Agricultural Research Sub-Institute (Sararood) for 2010-2011 cropping season ʳ|¿Z] {Y³Ê f¿ZÄm{ª¸»ÉZ»{ Äm{Z»{Âf» Á{Y| e d] ʸ̻Ìz^e 0 Absolute temperature (C ) f»Ê¸Ì» Ê^¿ f» {Y³Ê f¿Z ½Y|À^zË º¼ÌÀÌ»º¼Ë¯Z» Precipitatio Mean No. Relative Evaporation Month ÃZ» Min Max temperature (mm) n (mm) freezing moisture days (%) October 0.8 4 34.2 19.9 0 37 204 Æ» November 23.8 0 28.6 13.4 0 46.5 110.5 ½Z]M December 24.1 -4 21 8.2 21 47 0 }M January 45.5 -6 13.4 3.8 16 68.5 0 É{ February 69.4 -10 13.6 2.1 22 69.3 0 ¾¼Æ] March 35.3 -7 23.2 7.2 15 53 0 |À¨Y April 50.7 93.4 -2.4 25.8 11.4 3 48.6 ¾Ë{Á§ May 92.5 3.4 29 15.7 0 59.3 117 dÆ^Ë{Y June 0.4 5.2 39 22.5 0 26.3 335.5 {Y{y Ä]ÄmÂeZ]ZyÊfyYÂÀ°ËÌ£ËYÁÃ{Â]µfÀ¯dve ¾ËY]ZÀ] |f§YÊ » ©Z¨eY f¼¯ ZÅÃZ´fË Y tÌv dËË|» µZ{Á{Ì³Ê »¹Zn¿Y Z]®ËµZ|ÀqÅZy½Â»M Zy ½Â»M d§³ c Ê] ¾ËY į dYÃ|¿¹Zn¿Y Á¿ZËYÁÄËne¹Zn¿YÉY]MSTAT-CY§Y¹¿Y {¾°¿Y{ÉYÄÀ»Y{|Àq½Â»MÁÄ]Zž̴¿ZÌ»ÄËZ¬» yZ¾Ì]Ê´f^¼Å¶Ì¸veÉY]ÁµZ¼fuYt º ,ʸ̼°eÉZÌ]MÁ ºË{{°¸¼ÁÃ|Ä^Zv»ÉZÅ YcÔaÉZ]ÁʸYÉZÅĨ·R»Ä]ÄËne,É| ]ÄY{¼¿ ¾Ì] ]YÁ Ä ·Z» ÉY] | Ã{Z¨fY SPSS Y§Y ¹¿ ÉZ] | Ã{Z¨fY cÔaÉZ] ʰ̧Y³ ºÌe Y ZÅyZ Ây µÂ ½{Â] f¼¯ ¶Ì·{ {Â] ]» f» { ÄeÂ] ,ºË{ ËY Ä] d^¿ ʸ̼°e ÉZÌ]M ËY { dZ¯ ºfÌ {ÂmÁ ,ÊËZ»M Ã{Z» ĸ¼m Y ]ZÀ» dË{Á|v» ÃZ´fËY { cZËZ»M {ZË {Y| e Á {Á|v» ÉZÌ]M ÄËZ¬» ÉZÀ^» į dY Ê·Zu { ¾ËY Á Ã{Â] ÊeZ¬Ì¬ve ®Ë,ʸ̼°eÉZÌ]MÁºË{ËYÁ{Å{{°¸¼ÉY] {Â]]»f» Á{½YÌ»Ä][°¿Z»¯oZ«Z]dZ¯Y¶^«Á~] Zy ½Â»M lËZf¿ Ä] ÄmÂe Z] |¿| ʿ¨| YÅ { ,½ÁfÌ¿ ^À» ½M { į N30P30 É{¯ µÂ»§ ,Ä» |Ã{Z¨fY,{Â]¶bËecZ¨§aÂ,cZ¨§^À»ÁÃÁY ÉÁZ¯ cZ¬Ì¬ve ÉZÅ ÃZ´fËY ËY į ÊËZn¿M Y Ê°y¶¼veÉZÅyZ ZY]¹ÁÁ{¹|À³Äf§ÌaÉZÅ`Ìe¿Ê]ZËY½YZ°¼ÅÁZ¯Zy ZY]Ê°y¶¼veʼ¯ÉZÅyZ (YP) ʸ̼°e |¿|Ä^Zv»¶Ë}]YÁ ZfyZÊ]ZËYÁcZÔYÄËneÉY]É|̨»Y]Y cÔa Y Ã{Z¨fY Z] Gabriel, 1971 dY ħ Á{ ËeZ» Ä¿Y{ {°¸¼ ÉZÌ]M Á (YS) ºË{ ËY { ZÅ`Ìe¿ ଵିሺଢ଼ ିଢ଼ ሻ ൌ ଵିሺଢ଼തതതതିଢ଼തതതതౌ ሻ ሺǡ ͳͻͺሻ ౌ ൌ െ ୗ ሺǡ ͳͻͺͳሻ ൌ ൌ ଢ଼ ାଢ଼ౌ ሺǡ ͳͻͺͳሻ ଶ ଢ଼ ൈଢ଼ౌ ሺǡ ͳͻͻʹሻ തതതതത ሺଢ଼ౌ ሻమ ൌ ඥሺୗ ൈ ሻሺǡ ͳͻͻʹሻ ൌ ଢ଼ ଶሺଢ଼ౌ ൈଢ଼ ሻ ሺǡ ͳͻͻʹሻ ଢ଼ౌ ାଢ଼ ൌ ଢ଼ ሺ ǡ ͳͻͺͶሻ ౌ ଢ଼ ൌ ଢ଼ഥ ሺ Ǥ ǡ ͳͻͻሻ Ê°y¶¼ve|ÀZ]e®q¯ ÀeÄ]dÌZuÁ¶¼ve ZÅyZ ¾ËY ZY ] Y~· dY fÌ] ZÅ`Ìe¿ [Zzf¿Y Á ,{ , ÃZ¼ ÉZÅ`Ìe¿ {°¸¼Âf»¾fY{º£Ì¸{º«¾ËY]ZÀ] |¿| ½YÂÀÄ] ZÅyZ ¾ËYZ]ʸ̼°eÉZÌ]MËY{¾ÌËZa ¶ÌÁ|Ë{³Ê§ »Ê°y¶¼vf»ÉZÅ`Ìe¿YÊ°Ë ¶¼ve yZ Äq Šį |¿{¼¿ {ZÆÀÌa ¾Ì¸^»ZÅ Á Á f¼¯ `Ìe¿ Ê°y Ä] dÌZu |Z] e®q¯ ] Rosielle and Hamblin, 1981 dY e[¸» Á ÉÁÃÆ] ¾Ì´¿ZÌ» ,Àe Ä] ¶¼ve ÉZÅ yZ ZY , , , ÃZ¼ ÉZÅ`Ìe¿ ÉÁÃÆ] Ê|ÀÅ ¾Ì´¿ZÌ» ®Ì¿Â»Zž̴¿ZÌ» yZ ZY]Á ÁÊmZ Á,,ÊmZ,,ÃZ¼ÉZÅ`Ìe¿ ÉZÅ`Ìe¿ º«¾ËY]ZÀ] |¿{Y{ZfyY{Ây Ä]YY|¬»¾ËeÓZ] ÁºË{ËYÁ{Å{ÓZ]0Zf^¿{°¸¼¾fY{Z]ÊmZ Z]Ä¿Y{{°¸¼¿YÌ´¼q¥ÔfyY Á ʸ̼°eÉZÌ]M Yʰ˽YÂÀÄ] ZÅyZ ¾ËYZ]ÉY{Á{¹Z«Y |Ë{³Ê§ »Ê°y¶¼vf»ÉZÅ`Ìe¿ ÃZ³ÅÊ] ¾ËY{Äf§Z°] ÉZÅÁ ZY] ¾Ì´¿ZÌ» ,Àe Ä] ¶¼ve ÉZÅ yZ ÉYY{ ÊbÌe¿ ®Ì¿Â»Zž̴¿ZÌ»Á ÉÁÃÆ] Ê|Àž̴¿ZÌ»,ÉÁÃÆ] Àe Ä] dÌZu Á ¶¼ve Ë{Z¬» Y Á Ã{Â] ÉfÌ] ¶¼ve |Z] Y{Ây] ZÅ`Ìe¿ ËZ Ä] d^¿ Éf¼¯ Ä] ÄmÂe Z] dY{ |ÅYÂy Àe ËY Ä] d^¿ ÉfÆ] {{°¸¼\ÌeeÄ]തതത ୗ Áതതത ,ୗ , ,]YÁ¾ËY{ ¾Ì´¿ZÌ» ,ºË{ ËY { {°¸¼ ,ʸ̼°e ÉZÌ]M ËY ¾Ì´¿ZÌ» Á ʸ̼°e ÉZÌ]M ËY { ZÅ`Ìe¿ {°¸¼ |Z]Ê »ºË{ËY{ZÅ`Ìe¿ {°¸¼ hv]ÁlËZf¿ ½Z¿ µÁ|m { Ä ·Z» {» ÉZÅ`Ìe¿ ʳËÁ ÉY] ¿ZËYÁ ÄËne lËZf¿ ZY ] dY Ã| Ã{Y{ t { ÉY{ ÊÀ » ¥ÔfyY , µÁ|m Ä¿Y{ {°¸¼ ËYÁ{Å{Ä ·Z»{»ÉZÅ`Ìe¿ ¾Ì]µZ¼fuY ¶ZulËZf¿dY{{ÂmÁ ʸ̼°eÉZÌ]MÁ ºË{ÊÌv» µÁ|m{ÀeÄ]¶¼ve¦¸fz»ÉZÅyZ{ÁM]Y ºË{ËY{Ä¿Y{{°¸¼Âf»¾ËfÌ]dYÃ|»M Ä] Á ÊmZ , , ÃZ¼ ÉZÅ`Ìe¿ Ä] ª¸ f» {¹³ ,]»f»{¹³ Ë{Z¬»Z]\Ìee f»{¹³ Á]»f»{¹³ ,]»f» Y« bÁ a Ô¯{¾Ì´¿ZÌ»ÄËZ¬»{Á |Z]Ê »]» ]»f»{¹³ Z]Ì¿ ÃZ¼`Ìe¿ |¿Y{ Y« j Ô¯{Á dY{YÄ¿Y{{°¸¼Âf»¾Ëf¼¯ {°¸¼Âf»¾ËfÌ] ʸ̼°eÉZÌ]MËY{{Y{ ]»f»{¹³Z]ÃZ¼`Ìe¿Ä]ª¸ f»Ä¿Y{ Ä] Â]» Ä¿Y{ {°¸¼ Âf» ¾Ëf¼¯ Á a Ô¯ ]» f» { ¹³ Z] { ÃZ¼ `Ìe¿ ÉZÅ yZ Äq Šį ¾ËY Ä] ÄmÂe Z] {Â] g Ô¯ ¹ZÆqÃZ¼¹ÂµZcÔ£cZ¬Ì¬ve Ä ·Z»{»ÉZÅ`Ìe¿ÉY]ʸ̼°eÉZÌ]MÁºË{ËYdveÄ¿Y{{°¸¼¿ZËYÁÄËne µÁ|m Table 3. Analysis of variance of grain yield under rainfed and supplemental irrigation conditions for studied genotypes S.O.V. Ì̤e]ZÀ» É{YMÄm{ cZ ]»¾Ì´¿ZÌ» Ms df. ʸ̼°eÉZÌ]M{°¸¼ Replication Genotype Error C.V.% Y°e `Ìe¿ Zy cYÌ̤e\Ë ºË{{°¸¼ 2 YP 19339.78 YS 2538.57 22 39147.75** 3878.02** 44 4593.32 366.92 16.12 9.77 : Significant at 1% probability level.|{µZ¼fuYt{Y{ÊÀ »** ** {°¸¼ Z] Y{ ÊÀ » Á d^j» Ê´f^¼Å {°¸¼ yZ ¬§Y ZÅ`Ìe¿ yZ¾ËYdY{ ºË{ËY{Ä¿Y{ Á {¯ É|À] Ä^e ºË{ ËY { {°¸¼ ZY ] Y ËY Á{ Å { ÓZ] {°¸¼ Z] ÉZÅ`Ìe¿ d¿YÂf¿ ÉYY{ Ì¿ {°¸¼ ÉY|ËZa yZ |À¯ ÊËZZÀ Á ºË{ËY{{°¸¼Z]ÉY{ÊÀ »Ád^j»Ê´f^¼Å {Â] ʸ̼°eÉZÌ]MËY{{°¸¼Z]ʨÀ»Ê´f^¼Å Z] Á ºË{ ËY { ÓZ] {°¸¼ Z] ÉZÅ`Ìe¿ ¾ËY]ZÀ] [Zzf¿Y Y ʸ̼°e ÉZÌ]M ËY { ¦Ì {°¸¼ Z] ÉZÅ`Ìe¿ ÊËZZÀ Ä] {Z« yZ ¾ËY |À¯Ê » {Â^¿ ʸ̼°eÉZÌ]MÁºË{ËYÁ{Å{ÓZ]{°¸¼ ½YZ°¼Å Á Ã{» Ä Á Ê lËZf¿ Z] \·Z» ¾ËY ½YZ°¼ÅÁÉ|¿ÁY³Á Siosehmardeh et al., 2006 ºË{ËY{{Y{d¬]Z»Garavandi et al., 2010 Z] ¶¼ve Á Àe Ä] dÌZu ÉZÅyZ Ê´f^¼Å Ë{Z¬»Z]ÊËZÅ`Ìe¿ į Zn¿MY{Â] ʨÀ» Ä¿Y{{°¸¼ Ä] ¶¼ve Á Àe Ä] dÌZu ÉZÅyZ e®q¯ ] [Zzf¿Y |¿ÂÊ » ÄfyZÀ ¶¼vf» ÉZÅ`Ìe¿ ½YÂÀ į {ÂÊ »ÊËZÅ`Ìe¿ À˳hZ]yZ¾ËY ZY { ZŽM {°¸¼Ê·Á ,{Y{ºË{Ìv»{ÊËÓZ]{°¸¼ Falahi et al., 2011dYº¯Ê¸Ì¼°eÉZÌ]MÌv» Ã{Y{YÃ{Z¨fYZ] PCAʸYÉZÅĨ·R» Ä]ÄËne Ä] ¹ÁZ¬» ÉZÅ yZ Á `Ìe¿ Y ¶Zu ÉZÅ |Ä^Zv» ZŽM Ê ¼neºÆÁ ZÅĨ·R» ºÆ,Ê°y ʸY Ĩ·R»Á{Âe ZÅÃ{Y{ cYÌ̤e¶¯|{ µÁY Ĩ·R» Á{ ZY ] Y~· ,| ½ZÌ] PC1, PC2 µÁY Ĩ·R»¾Ì·ÁYÊ]¾ËY{¶°|ºÌecÔaÉZ] cYÌ̤e Y |{ ¹Á{ Ĩ·R» Á |{ ʸY ,,,ÃZ¼ÉZÅ`Ìe¿ į|z» µÁ|m ,Àe Ä] ¶¼ve ÉZÅ yZ ¿ Y Á ÊmZ ¾Ì´¿ZÌ» Á ÉÁÃÆ] Ê|ÀÅ ¾Ì´¿ZÌ» ,ÉÁÃÆ] ¾Ì´¿ZÌ» YÁÃ{Y{ZfyY{ÂyÄ]YË{Z¬»¾ËfÌ] ®Ì¿Â»ZÅ [Âv» ¶¼vf» ÉZÅ`Ìe¿ Lm ZÅyZ ¾ËY ¿ ÉZÅ yZ ZY ] [Zzf¿Y į ÊËZn¿M Y |¿ÂÊ » Ê|ÀÅ ¾Ì´¿ZÌ» ,ÉÁÃÆ] ¾Ì´¿ZÌ» ,Àe Ä] ¶¼ve {ÁdY{ÊÆ]Z»lËZf¿ ®Ì¿Â»Zž̴¿ZÌ»Á ÉÁÃÆ] Á ÊmZ , , , ÃZ¼ ÉZÅ`Ìe¿ cÓZu ¹Z¼e ÂÀ»Ä],|¿|ÄfyZÀ¶¼vf»ÉZÅ`Ìe¿ ½YÂÀÄ] ¾Ì] Y Àe ËY { {°¸¼ LZ¬] Y ½ZÀ̼Y µÂu Ë{Z¬» ¾ËfÌ] į ÊËZŽM Ã| [Zzf¿Y ÉZÅ`Ìe¿ ¾ËY ] |¿| [Zzf¿Y |ÀfY{ Y ºË{ ËY { {°¸¼ ,ÃZ¼ÉZÅ`Ìe¿ {Âm»ÉZÅ`Ìe¿ ¾Ì]Y ZY |¿|[Zzf¿Y¶¼vf»ÉZÅ`Ìe¿ ½YÂÀÄ]ÁÊmZ yZ {ÂÊ »Ã|ÅZ» µÁ|m{į ½Z¼Å Ê|Àž̴¿ZÌ»,ÉÁÃÆ] ¾Ì´¿ZÌ»,ÀeÄ]¶¼ve ÉZÅ Á d^j» Ê´f^¼Å ÉYY{ ®Ì¿Â»ZÅ ¾Ì´¿ZÌ» Á ÉÁÃÆ] ÉZÌ]M Á ºË{ ËY { Ä¿Y{ {°¸¼ Z] ÉY{ ÊÀ » ¾ËfÆ] ¯~» ÉZÅ yZ ¾ËY]ZÀ] ,|¿{Â] ʸ̼°e lËZf¿ |ÀfÅ e] ÉZÅ`Ìe¿ ÊËZZÀ ÉY] ZÅyZ Sio-SehMardeh et Ã{» Ä Á Ê lËZf¿ Z] ¯~» Falahi ½YZ°¼ÅÁÊuÔ§,¹|À³Ê]{al., 2006 Á ÃZ¬¿Zy Ê·ZÀË ,¹ÁÁ{ ¹|À³ Ê] { et al., 2011 { Zeinaly Khanghah et al., 2004 ½YZ°¼Å Choukan et al., ½YZ°¼Å Á ½Z³Âq ,ZË Ê] ½YZ°¼Å Á ʸ nÀ³ Á ÉY Ä¿Y{ c} Ê] { 2006 {Y{d¬]Z»{Âz¿Ê]{ Ganjali et al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d,4,)&dIPe&:Uf'C/J&3$?@/2A;B&-5$(X49&cW94$10?&,&4$Mb$# `a ¹ZÆqÃZ¼¹ÂµZcÔ£cZ¬Ì¬ve ¹|À³ÉZÅ`Ìe¿ ÉY]ʸ̼°eÉZÌ]MÁºË{ËY{Ä¿Y{{°¸¼Z]Ê°y¶¼veÉZÅyZ¾Ì]Ê´f^¼ÅÄËneµÁ|m Ä ·Z»{»¹ÁÁ{ Table 5. Correlation analysis between drought tolerance indices and grain yield under rainfed and supplemental irrigation conditions for studied durum wheat genotypes yZ {°¸¼ {°¸¼ ¾Ì´¿ZÌ» ¾Ì´¿ZÌ» ¾Ì´¿ZÌ» ¶¼ve yZ yZ yZ TOL ÉY|ËZa ºË{ ÉZÌ]M ÉÁÃÆ] Ê|ÀÅ ®Ì¿Â»ZÅ Ä]¶¼ve dÌZu {°¸¼ Ys MP HAM YI {°¸¼ ʸ̼°e ÉÁÃÆ] Àe ÀeÄ] ºË{{°¸¼ (Ys) ÉZÌ]M{°¸¼ (Yp)ʸ̼°e 1 Yp 0.262n.s 0.44* GMP 0.672** 0.878** STI -0.147n.s 0.659** SSI -0.145n.s 1** YSI 0.444* 1 0.935** 0.853** 0.661** 0.865** 0.865** 0.261n.s -0.662** 0.865** ÁµZ¼fuYt{Y{ÊÀ »ÁY{ÊÀ »Ì£\ÌeeÄ]**Á,ns ns * , and ** Not significant and significant at 5% and 1% probability levels, respectively. µÁYĨ·R»Á{ ZY]¹ÁÁ{¹|À³ÉZÅ`Ìe¿ÁÊ°y¶¼veÉZÅyZcÔaÉZ]ʰ̧Y³ºÌe¶° Figure 1. Biplot of drought tolerance indices and durum wheat genotypes based on first two components. ®Ì¿Â»Zž̴¿ZÌ»ÁÉÁÃÆ] Ê|Àž̴¿ZÌ»,ÉÁÃÆ] {°¸¼Ä]Â]»Y{]Ä] ÃZ¼`Ìe¿|Àf§³Y« ¾ËY ´¿ZÌ] ¾ËY Á dY{ ¶ËZ¼e ʸ̼°e ÉZÌ]M ËY { ¾ËY { Ê°y ¶¼ve yZ ÉY] ÓZ] Ë{Z¬» į dY ÉZÌ]MËY{½MÉÓZ]{°¸¼d¸Ä]fÌ]`Ìe¿ { Ì¿ Á ÃZ¼ ÉZÅ`Ìe¿ dY Ã{Â] ʸ̼°e Y« ¶¼ve Á Àe Ä] dÌZu ÉZÅ yZ cÁZn» ÁÃ{Â]Ê°yÄ] Zu ZÅ`Ìe¿ ¾ËY¾ËY]ZÀ]|Àf§³ ÄËÁY|ÀfÅÊ]M ÉZÅÌ v»Ä]ÊÂyÉZ³ZÉYY{ ,ÉÁÃÆ] ¾Ì´¿ZÌ»,ÀeÄ]¶¼ve ÉZÅyZ¾Ì]Ã{Zu d·Ó{ ®Ì¿Â»ZÅ ¾Ì´¿ZÌ» Á ÉÁÃÆ] Ê|ÀÅ ¾Ì´¿ZÌ» ÊeYÌ̤eµÁYĨ·R»Ä¯ÊËZn¿MY{¯ÄÌmÂeYZÅÃ{Y{ ¶¯ Á {ÂÊ ¼¿¾ÌÌ^e ¹Á{ Ĩ·R» Âeį {Ì³Ê » ]{Y Á{ c Ä] ½YÂeÊ » Y Ĩ·R» Á{ dÆm ¾ËY Y ,° ·Z] ¾ËY ZY]Y ZÅ`Ìe¿ Á{Y{ËZ¼¿ºÅ]{¼Âv» cÔaÉZ]{{¼¿z»cÔaÉZ]t{Ĩ·Â»Á{ ¶°¹Á{ÁµÁYʸYÉZÅĨ·Â»ÉZÀ^»]Ã|ºÌe ¾Ì´¿ZÌ»Z]įÄf§³Y« ÊËZÅÃÁ³ ½Á{{ZÅ`Ìe¿ ÉZ]Y{¼¿|ÀfÅ^e» ZŽM ÀeÄ]¶¼veÁ{°¸¼ , ÃZ¼ ÉZÅ`Ìe¿ į {Y{ ½Z¿ ¶° cÔa yZ Ä] Â]» ÉZÅY{] cÁZn» { Á ÊmZ ¾Ì´¿ZÌ» ,Àe Ä] ¶¼ve Ê°y Ä] d»ÁZ¬» ºÆ» ÉZÅ Ê°y¶¼veÉZÅyZ ZY]¹ÁÁ{¹|À³Äf§ÌaÉZÅ`Ìe¿Ê]ZËY½YZ°¼ÅÁZ¯Zy (STI)Àe¶¼veyZYÃ{Z¨fYZ]Ê°yÀeÃ|ÀÀ¯¶¼veÉZÅ`Ìe¿À˳ ¶° Figure 2. Selection of drought tolerant genotypes using stress tolerance index (STI). Á ʸ̼°e ÉZÌ]M Á ºË{ ËY Á{ Å { ÓZ] {°¸¼ |¿Z¿§ A ÃÁ³ { ÓZ] Àe Ä] ¶¼ve ¾fY{ Ê°y Ä] ¶¼vf» Á Äf§³ Y« Fernandez, 1992 AÃÁ³ÌzeÉY]É| ]ÄY{¼¿YÃ{Z¨fY|¿{Â] Ganjali et ½YZ°¼ÅÁʸ nÀ³Âe ZÅÃÁ³ËZY ½YZ°¼Å Á {§ Ê¿Z¼Ì¸ ,{Âz¿ { al., 2009 ½YZ°¼ÅÁÉ|m]Á Soleymanifard et al., 2010 Ã|Y³ ¹ÁÁ{¹|À³{ Zebarjadi et al., 2013 |Å{Ê »½Z¿Ê]¾ËYY¶ZulËZf¿É|À]¼mdY { Ä¿Y{ {°¸¼ Ê´f^¼Å Y ¶Zu lËZf¿ Ä] ÄmÂe Z] Ä] ¶¼ve ÉZÅ yZ Z] ʸ̼°e ÉZÌ]M Á ºË{ ËY ,cÔa ÉZ] Y{¼¿ Á ʸY ÉZÅĨ·R» Ä] ÄËne ,Àe ¹|À³ ÉZÅ`Ìe¿ ½{¯ µZ]£ÉY]yZ ¾Ëe\ZÀ» yZ Ê°y Ä] ¶¼vf» ÉZÅ`Ìe¿ ¾ÌÌ e Á ¹ÁÁ{ Ê|Àž̴¿ZÌ»,ÉÁÃÆ] ¾Ì´¿ZÌ»,ÀeÄ]¶¼veÉZÅ ¾ËY ZY ] į |ÀfÅ ®Ì¿Â»ZÅ ¾Ì´¿ZÌ» Á ÉÁÃÆ] Ä] Á ÊmZ , ÃZ¼ ÉZÅ`Ìe¿ ZÅyZ |¿ÂÊ »Ê§ »Ê°yÄ]¶¼vf»ÉZÅ`Ìe¿ ½YÂÀ ¾ÌÀr¼ÅdY ZÅyZ ¾ËY¾Ì]ÓZ]Ê´f^¼Å{ÂmÁ] Á{Å{{°¸¼Z]d^j»Ê´f^¼ÅÉYY{ZÅyZ ¾ËY ÓZ]Ê´f^¼Å{ÂmÁ|¿{Â] ʸ̼°eÉZÌ]MÁ ºË{Ìv» Á ´Ë|°Ë Z] ¶¼ve Á Àe Ä] dÌZu yZ Á{ ¾Ì] {{°¸¼Z] ZÅyZ ¾ËYÉÓZ]ÁʨÀ»Ê´f^¼ÅÌ¿ {{°¸¼Z] ZŽM ÉÓZ]Ád^j»Ê´f^¼ÅÁºË{ËY {Â] {ÂÆ» cÔa ÉZ] Y{¼¿ { ʸ̼°e ÉZÌ]M ËY cÔa ÉZ] Y{¼¿ Á ʸY ÉZÅĨ·R» Ä] ÄËne Y Ã{Z¨fY Âe ¹ÁÁ{ ¹|À³ { ¹ÁZ¬» ÉZÅ`Ìe¿ [Zzf¿Y ÉY] ,Mohammadi et al., 2010 ½YZ°¼Å Á É|¼v» Soleymanifard et al., ½YZ°¼Å Á {§ Ê¿Z¼Ì¸ Khezri Afravi et al., ÉÁY¨ Éy Á 2010 dYÄf§³Y«|ÌËZe{»2010 ÊËÓZ]Ê´f^¼ÅįÊËZÅyZ Ë{Z¬»YÃ{Z¨fYZ] |ÀfY{ ʸ̼°eÉZÌ]MÁºË{ËYÁ{Å{{°¸¼Z] Y{¼¿ ¾ËY { ¶° | º É| ] Ä Y{¼¿ ÁºË{ËY{{°¸¼¶]Z¬»{ÀeÄ]¶¼veyZ ÉZÅ`Ìe¿ Y~· -dY Ã| Ã{Y{ ½Z¿ ʸ̼°e ÉZÌ]M Z] ÊËZÅ`Ìe¿ ½YÂÀ Ä] Á ÊmZ , ÃZ¼ References Araus, J. L., Slafer, G. A., Reynolds, M. P. and Royo, C. 2002. Plant breeding and drought in C3 cereal should we breed for? Annals of Botany 89: 925-940. Azizinia, Sh., Bihamta, M., Zali, A., Yazdi-Samadi, B. and Ahmadi, A. 2005. Evaluation of quantitative traits related to drought resistance in synthetic genotypes of bread wheat under water stressed and non-stressed conditions. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 36: 281-295. (In Persian). ¹ZÆqÃZ¼¹ÂµZcÔ£cZ¬Ì¬ve Bouslama, M. and Schapaugh, W. T. 1984. Stress tolerance in soybean. Part 1. Evaluation of three screening techniques for heat and drought tolerance. Crop Science 24: 933-937. Choukan, R., Taherkhani, T., Ghanndha, M. R. and Khodarahmi, M. 2006. Evaluation of drought tolerance in grain maize inbred lines using drought tolerance indices. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 8 (1): 79-89. (In Persian). Falahi, H. A., Alat Jafarbai, J. and Sayedi, F. 2011. Evaluation of drought tolerance in durum wheat genotypes using drought tolerance indices. Seed and Plant Improvement Journal 27-1 (1): 1522. (In Persian). Fernandez, G. C. J. 1992. Effective selection criteria for assessing plant stress tolerance. Proceeding of Crop Symposium, 13-18 Aug., Taiwan, pp: 257-270. Fisher, R. A. and Maurer, R. 1978. Drought resistance in spring wheat cultivars: I. Grain yield responses. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 29: 897-912. Gabriel, K. R. 1971. The biplot graphical display of matrices with applications to principal component analysis. Biometrica 58: 453-467. Ganjali, A., Bagheri, A. and Porsa, H. 2009. Evaluation of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) gemplasm for drought resistance. Iranian Journal of Field Crop Research 7 (1): 183-194. (In Persian). Garavandi, M., Farshadfar, E. A. and Kahrizi, D. 2010. Evaluation of drought tolerance in bread wheat advanced genotypes in field and laboratory conditions. Seed and Plant Improvement Journal 26-1 (2): 223-252. (In Persian). Hatim, M., Majidian, M. and Babaie, T. 2008. Evaluation of drought tolerance in bread wheat cultivars and inbred lines using drought tolerance indices. Archive of SID. 1: 25-39. (In Persian). Islami, M., Arzani, A. and Meybodi, A. M. 2004. Evaluation of agronomic traits and inheritance ability their in tolerance to salty durum wheat genotypes in without stress field conditions. Journal of Agricultural Sciences 27 (2): 101-112. Khezri Afravi, M., Hoseinzadeh, E. A., Mohammadi, V. A. and Ahmadi, E. 2010. Evaluation of drought resistance in local durum wheat cultivars in Iran under drought stress and natural irrigation conditions. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 41 (4): 741-753. (In Persian). Matsuo, R. R. 1998. Durum wheat: its unique pasta-making properties. P 169-178, In: Bushuk, W. and Rasper, V. F. (Eds.), Wheat production, properties and quality. Chapman and Hall. Ministry of Jehad-E-Agriculture. 1997. Cereal in statistics mirror. Statistics and information office, ministry of Jehad-E-Agriculture. Tehran, Iran. (In Persian). Moghadasi, L., Rashidi, V. and Razban, A. 2009. Effect of drought stress on grain yield and some morphological traits in durum wheat inbred lines. Journal of Science and Technology in Agricultural Sciences of Islamic Azad University-Tabriz Branch 12: 41-53. (In Persian). Mohammadi, R., Armion, M., Kahrizi, D. and Amri, A. 2010. Efficiency of screening techniques for evaluating durum wheat genotypes under mild drought conditions. International Journal of Plant Production 4 (1): 11-24. Mohammadi, R. 2010. Saji, a new durum wheat cultivar adapted to rainfed and supplementary irrigation conditions of moderate cold and moderate warm areas of Iran. Seed and Plant Improvement Journal 26-1 (4): 561-564. (In Persian). Nachit, M. M., Baum, M., Poreciddu, E., Monneveux, P. and Picard, E. 1998. SEWANA (South Eroupe, West Asia and North Africa) Durum Research Network. Proceeding of the SEWANA Durum Network Workshop, 20-23 March 1995. ICARDA, Aleppo, Syria. Vii + 354 p. Panthuwan, G., Fukai, S., Cooper, M., Rajatasereekul, S. and Otoole, J. C. 2002. Yield respond of rice (Oryza sativa L.) genotype to different types of drought under rainfed lowlands. Part I. Grain yield and yield components. Field Crops Research 73: 153-168. Rajaram, S., Varughese, G., Abballa, O., Pferiffer, W. H. and Van Ginkel, M. 1996. Accomplishments and challenges in wheat and triticale breeding at CIMMYT. Plant Breeding 63 (2): 131-139. Rosielle, A. A. and Iambling, J. I. 1981. Theoretical aspects of selection for yield in stress and nonstress environments. Crop Science 21: 943-946. Sadeghzadeh Ahari, D. 2006. Evaluation for tolerance to drought stress in promising dryland durum wheat genotypes. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 8 (1): 30-45. (In Persian). Ê°y¶¼veÉZÅyZ ZY]¹ÁÁ{¹|À³Äf§ÌaÉZÅ`Ìe¿Ê]ZËY½YZ°¼ÅÁZ¯Zy Siosehmardeh, A., Ahmadi, A., Poustini, K. and Mohammadi, V. 2006. Evaluation of drought resistance indices under various environmental conditions. Field Crops Research 98: 222-229. Soleymanifard, A., Fasihi, KH., Nasrirad, H. and Naseri, R. 2010. Evaluation of stress tolerance indices in durum wheat genotypes. Journal of Plant Production 17 (2): 39-58. (In Persian). Srivastava, J. P. 1984. Durum wheat: its world status and potential in the middle east and north Africa. Rachis 3: 1-8. Talebi, R., Fayaz, F. and Mohammadnaji, A. 2009. Effective selection criteria for assessing drought stress tolerance in durum wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Plant Physiology 35: 64-74. USDA. 2009. Office of global analysis. Global durum area. Production and yield. USDA. Voltas, J., Romagosa, I., Lafarga, A., Armesto, A. P., Sombrero, A. and Araus, J. L. 1999. Genotype by environment interaction for grain yield and carbon isotope discrimination of barley in Mediterranean Spain. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 50: 1263-1271. Yahoueian, S. H., Ghannadha, M. R., Babaie, H. R. and Habibi, D. 2006. Evaluation of soybean genotypes in drought stress conditions. Iranian Journal of Agronomy and Plant Breeding 2: 5772. (In Persian). Zebarjadi, A. R., Tavakoli Shadpei, S., Etminan, A. R. and Mohammadi, R. 2013. Evaluation of drought stress tolerance in durum wheat genotype using drought tolerance indices. Seed and Plant Improvement Journal 29-1 (1): 1-12. (In Persian). Zeinaly Khanghah, H., Izanloo, A., Hoseinzadeh, A. H. and Majnoon Hoseini, N. 2004. Determination of the suitable drought resistance indices in commercial soybean varieties. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 35 (4): 875-885. (In Persian). 279 Cereal Research, Vol. 3, No. 4, 2014 (267-279) Evaluation of durum wheat advanced genotypes based on drought tolerance indices Nasim Khaksar1*, Ezatollah Farshadfar2 and Reza Mohammadi3 1 and 2. Ph. D. Studentand Prof., respectively, Dept. of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agriculture,Razi University, Kermanshah 3. Assist. Prof., Dryland Agricultural Research Sub-Institute, Sararood Station, Kermanshah (Received: May 29, 2013- Accepted: December 9, 2013) Abstract To investigate drought tolerance indices and identify drought tolerant genotypes in durum wheat, 20 advanced durum wheat genotypes along with three checks, Zardak and Saji (durum wheat checks) and Sardari (bread wheat check) were assessed in a randomized complete block design with 3 replications under two rainfed and supplemental irrigation conditions in the Drayland Agricultural Research Sub-Institute (Sararood, Kermanshah, Iran) in 2010-11 cropping season. Drought tolerance indices i.e. mean productivity (MP), tolerance index (TOL), genomic mean productivity (GMP), harmonic mean (HAM), stress susceptibility index (SSI), stress tolerance index (STI), yield index (YI) and yield stability index (YSI) were calculated on the basis of grain yield in the both stress and nonstress conditions. The genotypes No. 2, 4, 8, 21 (Saji) and 18 with the highest values of MP, GMP, HAM and STI were found to be tolerant genotypes, while the genotypes 12, 21 (Zardak), 16 and 19 with the lowest values of TOL and SSI had the least susceptibility to drought stress. Biplot analysis indicated that the genotypes No. 8, 21 (Saji) and 18 were characterized by the indices of MP, GMP, HAM and STI as drought tolerant genotypes. The results of this research showed that in all of the genotypes, genotypes No. 8, 21 and 18 were tolerant genotypes. Keywords: Drought stress, Drought tolerance indices, Durum wheat, Grain yield *Corresponding author: [email protected]