ﾊ瑞ze ﾃZｴ戸Zｼｿ ﾁ ﾊｸｻ 翰Zｼﾅ ｾﾌｼnﾀa d依 摸v» ﾊ ﾀﾆｻ

HSE
The 5th National Conference & Exhibition on Environmental Engineering
1390 -
-1
[email protected]
-2
[email protected]
-3
[email protected]
.
SBR SBS
.
.
.
.
:
.
ITS
- 51
:
1453793399
HSE
The 5th National Conference & Exhibition on Environmental Engineering
1390 -
.
.
.
.
.
-
-
-
(SBS)
-
.
SBR SBS .
.[8 9 13 16 21]
(SBR)
SBS
2005
SBR SBS
Yektin Yildirim
.
[11].
SBR
.
2009
SBS
5
SBS
6 5 4
SBS
.[14]
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
..
.[17]
2005
Yektin Yildirim
[11 ].
- 51
:
1453793399
HSE
The 5th National Conference & Exhibition on Environmental Engineering
1390 -
.
SBS ,SBR
.
.2
.
.
.
60-70
.[1]
.
2
1
.
:(1)
25
ASTM C-131
%3/5
ASTM C-88
0/89
ASTM C-127
60/70
:(2)
25
ASTM D113
100
25
1/017
ASTM D-70
43 :
ASTM D-36
51 :
- 51
:
1453793399
HSE
The 5th National Conference & Exhibition on Environmental Engineering
1390 -
25
64
ASTM D-5
230
ASTM D-92
170
.
SBS SBR
SBS
.
5
SBS SBR
.
180 160
2000 rpm
SMA
.
7
3
200
60
.
30
.
SBS SBR
3
SBR
.[2]
.
(SMA)
.
:(3)
FHWA TWG
100
100
19
90
85-95
12/5
72/5
75
9/5
24
20-28
4/75
20
16-24
2/36
14
12-16
0/6
13/5
12-15
0/3
9
8-10
0/075
.3
.
50
.
(ASTM D1559)
.
72
.
.
4
.
- 51
:
1453793399
HSE
The 5th National Conference & Exhibition on Environmental Engineering
1390 -
:(4)
1
2
3
4
5
CR%10
SBS%5
SBR%5
6
CR%5
%10
+
%5
(%)
(kg)
6
6
6
6
6
6
493
496
489
579
504
341
2 1/5
4
.
SBS%5
.
SBR%5
.
21
:(1)
- 51
:
1453793399
HSE
The 5th National Conference & Exhibition on Environmental Engineering
1390 -
:(2)
.4
.
.
.
.
3
.[5]
:(3)
.
.
25
0/35
.
.
4
.
.[4 6 7 10]
740/6
%5 CR %5
.[15]
.
464/7
25
.
.[20 19]
.
.[12]
- 51
:
1453793399
HSE
The 5th National Conference & Exhibition on Environmental Engineering
1390 -
:(4)
.
.
(
) MQ
.
.
.
.
.
MQ
.
MQ
.[20]
.5
:
.
.1
.
%5 CR %5
.
.
.
.2
- 51
:
1453793399
HSE
The 5th National Conference & Exhibition on Environmental Engineering
1390 -
.
.3
.
SBS%5
SBR%5
.4
.
.5
.6
.
.6
.
.
07
"101
"
.
" .(1387)
" .(1379)
.
[1]
[2]
206
"(SMA)
" (1373)
.73
" SBS
[3]
[4] Aktharhusein A, Tayebali A, Monosmith CL. Comparison of axial and diametral resiliency stiffness of
asphalt-aggregate mixes. Transportation research record No. 1492.Transportation Research Board,
National Research Council, Washington (DC); 1995. p. 135– 43.
[5] Anagnos JN, Kennedy TW. Practical method of conducting the indirect tensile test.Center of Highway
Research, University of Texas at Austin, Res. Rep. 98-10; August 1972.
[6] Baladi GY, Harichandran RS. Asphalt mix design and the indirect test: a new horizon. ASTM STP 104
,
Philadelphia; 1989.
[7] Brown ER, Foo KY. Evaluation of variability in resilient modulus test results. J Test Evaluat 1991; 19:1–
13.
[8] Fawcett, A. H., and McNally, T., (2000)”Blends of Bitumen with Various Polyolefins. Polymer;”
41(14):5315–26.
- 51
:
1453793399
HSE
The 5th National Conference & Exhibition on Environmental Engineering
1390 [9] Fawcett, A. H., McNally, T., McNally, GM., Andrews, F., and Clarke, J., (1999)”Blends of Bitumen with
Polyethylenes. Polymer”; 40(23):6337–49.
[10]
Harvey J, Monismith CL. Effects of laboratory asphalt concrete specimen preparation variables on
fatigue and permanent deformation test results using Strategic Highway Research Program A-003
proposed testing equipment. Transportation research record No.1417.Transportation Research Board,
National Research Council, Washington (DC); 1993. p. 38–48.
[11] Hinishoglu, S., Agar, E., (2003)” Use of Waste High Density Polyethylene as Bitumen Modifier in
Asphalt Concrete Mix.” Mater Lett; 58(3–4):267–71.
[12]
Huang B, Li G, Mohammed NL. Analytical modeling and experimental study of tensile strength of
asphalt concrete composite at low temperatures. Composites: Part B 2003; 34:705–14.
[13] Kelloma, kia, and Korhonen, M., (1996)” Dispersion of Polyolefins in Bitumen by Means of Tall Oil
Pitch, and Microscopic Characterization of Mixes.” Fuel; 75(7):896–8.
[14] Khodaii, Ali, Mehrara, Amir, (2009) “Evaluation of Permanent Deformation of Unmodified and SBS
Modified Asphalt Mixtures using Dynamic Creep Test”.
[15] Maupin GW. Results of indirect tensile tests related to asphalt fatigue. Highway Research Board 1972;1–
7.
[16] Panda, M., and Mazumdar, M., (2002) “Utilization of Reclaimed Polyethylene in Bituminous Paving
Mixes”. J Mater Civil Eng; 14(6):527–30.
[17] Polacco, G., Berlincioni, S., (2005)”Asphalt Modification with Different Polyethylene-Based Polymers”.
[18] Rogue R, Zhang Z, Sankar B. Determination of crack growth rate parameters of asphalt mixtures using
the superpave indirect tension test IDT. J Asphalt Paving Technol 1999; 68:404–33.
[19] Soudagari, J., (1990) “Effect of Road Surface Type/Texture on Rolling and Skidding Resistance”,
International Symposium on Highway Surfacing at Ulster University, UK.
[20] Whiteoak D. Shell bitumen handbook. UK: Shell Bitumen; 1991.
[21] Yousefy, A. A., Ait-Kadi, A. and Roy, C., (2000) “Composite Asphalt Binders: Effect of Modified RPE on
Asphalt.” J Mater Civil Eng; 12(2):113–23.
[22] Zhang Z, Rogue R, Birgisson B, Sangpetngam B. Identification and verification of a suitable crack
growth law. J Asphalt Paving Technol 2001;70:206–41.
- 51
:
1453793399