Comments
Description
Transcript
平成 23 年度 認証評価に関する調査研究
ᖹᡂ ᖺᗘ ㄆドホ౯㛵ࡍࡿㄪᰝ◊✲ ᖹᡂ ᖺ ᭶ ᪥ බ┈㈈ᅋἲே㻌 ᪥ᮏ㧗➼ᩍ⫱ホ౯ᶵᵓ ᕳ 㢌 ゝ ᪥ᮏ㧗➼ᩍ⫱ホ౯ᶵᵓ㸦௨ୗࠊホ౯ᶵᵓ㸧ࡣࠊᖹᡂ 17(2005)ᖺᏛᰯᩍ⫱ἲ➨ 110 ᮲ ᇶ࡙ࡃᏛࡢㄆドホ౯ᶵ㛵ࡋ࡚ࠊᩥ㒊⛉Ꮫ⮧ࡽㄆドࡉࢀࠊࡑࡢᚋࠊᖹᡂ 22(2010) ᖺᗘࡲ࡛ࡢ㛫ࠊ272 Ꮫࡢᶵ㛵ูㄆドホ౯ࢆᐇ࠸ࡓࡋࡲࡋࡓࠋ᭦ࠊබ┈ἲேᨵ㠉㛵㐃 ἲᇶ࡙ࡁࠊෆ㛶⥲⌮⮧ࡽබ┈㈈ᅋἲேࡢㄆᐃࢆཷࡅࠕබ┈㈈ᅋἲே ᪥ᮏ㧗➼ᩍ⫱ホ ౯ᶵᵓࠖࡋ࡚ᖹᡂ 24 ᖺ 4 ᭶ 1 ᪥᪂ࡓ࡞ฟⓎࢆࡋࡲࡋࡓࠋ ᶵ㛵ูㄆドホ౯ࡣࠊᅜࡢᐃࡵࡿ 7 ᖺ௨ෆࡈ୍ᗘࡢ᭱ึࡢࢧࢡࣝࡀ⤊ࢃࡾࠊ➨ 2 ࢧ ࢡࣝࢆ㏄࠼࡚࠸ࡲࡍࠋࡇࢀࢆᶵࠊࡇࢀࡲ࡛ࡢ⤒㦂ࢆ㋃ࡲ࠼࡚ࠊᏛࡢ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ ౯ཬࡧㄆドホ౯ࡢ࠶ࡾ᪉ࡸᙺࢆ᳨ウࡋࠊㄆドホ౯ࢩࢫࢸ࣒ࡢ㠃ⓗ࡞ᨵゞࢆ⾜࠸ࠊᖹ ᡂ 24(2012)ᖺᗘࡽ᪂ࡓ࡞ホ౯ࢩࢫࢸ࣒ࡼࡾࠊㄆドホ౯ࢆᐇࡍࡿࡇࡋࡲࡋࡓࠋ ࡇࡢᨵゞక࠸ࠊࡇࢀࡲ࡛ࡢㄆドホ౯ࢆࡾ㏉ࡿࡶ᪂ࢩࢫࢸ࣒ࡢᵓ⠏ྥࡅ࡚ࠊ 2 ࡘࡢࢸ࣮࣐ࡘ࠸࡚ㄪᰝ◊✲ࢆ⾜࠸ࡲࡋࡓࠋࢸ࣮࣐ 1 ࡣࠕ㐣ᖺᗘཷᑂᏛᑐࡍࡿㄪᰝ ◊✲ࠖࡋ࡚ࠊ๓㏙ࡢ 272 Ꮫᑐࡋࠊㄆドホ౯ᐇᚋࡢ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯ࡢ≧ἣࡸホ౯ᶵ ᵓᑐࡍࡿពぢ࡞ࢆ୰ᚰㄪᰝࢆ⾜࠺ࡶ㐣ཤࡢㄆドホ౯⤖ᯝࡢ୰ࡽᣦࡢከࡃ ࠶ࡗࡓㄢ㢟ࢆྲྀୖࡆࠊࣥࢱࣅ࣮ࣗㄪᰝ࡞ࢆ⾜࠸ࠊ⤖ᯝࢆࡲࡵࡲࡋࡓࠋࢸ࣮࣐ 2 ࡛ࡣࠊ ࠕ⡿ᅜ༡㒊ᆅ༊ᇶ‽༠ཬࡧྠ༠ᡤᒓᏛࡢホ౯㛵ࡍࡿㄪᰝ◊✲ࠖࡋ࡚ࠊ᪂ࢩࢫࢸ ࣒ࡢࣔࢹࣝࡋࡓ⡿ᅜࡢࢪ࣮ࣙࢪᕞࡢࢺࣛࣥࢱᕷ࠶ࡾࡲࡍ Southern Association of Colleges and Schools㸦༡㒊ᆅ༊ᇶ‽༠㸧ཬࡧྠ༠ᡤᒓࡢ」ᩘࡢᏛࢆゼၥࡋࠊホ౯ ࡢ᰿ᣐ࡞ࡿ࢚ࣅࢹࣥࢫࡢࡸุᐃ➼㛵ࡍࡿㄪᰝࢆ⾜࠺ࡶ⤖ᯝࢆࡲࡵࡲࡋࡓࠋ ᮏሗ࿌᭩ࡣࠊᅜෆࡢ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯ࡢయไࡸᨵၿ≧ἣ࡞ࢆࡣࡌࡵࠊᾏእࡢᶵ㛵ูホ౯ ࡢඛ㐍ⓗ࡞ྲྀ⤌ࡳ㛵ࡍࡿሗࡢඹ᭷ࢆ┠ⓗࡋ࡚ࡲࡵࡓࡶࡢ࡛ࡍࠋᚋࠊྛᏛࡀࡼ ࡾ✚ᴟⓗ࡞⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯ࡢᐇࡸࡑࢀక࠺ᨵ㠉ᨵၿྥࡅ࡚ཧ⪃ࡋ࡚ࡈά⏝࠸ࡓࡔ ࡅࢀࡤᖾ࠸࡛ࡍࠋ ᭱ᚋࠊࡇࡢㄪᰝ◊✲ࡈ༠ຊ࠸ࡓࡔࡁࡲࡋࡓ㛵ಀ⪅ࡢ᪉ࠎ⾺ᚰࡼࡾᚚ♩⏦ࡋୖࡆࡲ ࡍࠋ ᖹᡂ 24(2012)ᖺ 7 ᭶ බ┈㈈ᅋἲே ᪥ᮏ㧗➼ᩍ⫱ホ౯ᶵᵓ ⌮㛗 㯮⏣ ኖ ┠ ḟ ㄪᰝ◊✲ࢸ࣮࣐㸯 ࠕ㐣ᖺᗘཷᑂᏛᑐࡍࡿㄪᰝ◊✲ࠖ یㄪᰝ◊✲ࡢᴫせ ㄪᰝ◊✲ࡢ᪨ ㄪᰝࡢෆᐜཬࡧ᪉ἲ Ϩ ᣦ㡯➼ศᯒ⤖ᯝ ࠕඃࢀࡓⅬࠖࡘ࠸࡚ ࠕᨵၿࢆせࡍࡿⅬࠖࡘ࠸࡚ ࠕཧ⪃ពぢࠖࡘ࠸࡚ ⥲ᣓ ϩ ࣥࢣ࣮ࢺㄪᰝ㞟ィ⤖ᯝ ཷᑂᏛࡢᇶᮏሗࡘ࠸࡚ ๓ᅇࡢㄆドホ౯ཷᑂᚋࡘ࠸࡚ Ꮫෆࡢ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯ཬࡧḟᅇࡢㄆドホ౯ཷᑂࡘ࠸࡚ ▷ᮇᏛࡢㄆドホ౯ࡘ࠸࡚ ᪥ᮏ㧗➼ᩍ⫱ホ౯ᶵᵓᑐࡋ࡚ࡢࡈពぢ ⥲ᣓ Ϫ ࣥࢱࣅ࣮ࣗㄪᰝ ឡ▱ᕤᴗᏛ 㜰ၟᴗᏛ 㛵すᅜ㝿Ꮫ ༓ⴥᕤᴗᏛ ᖇிᏛ 㯇⃝Ꮫ ⥲ᣓ ㄪᰝ◊✲ࢸ࣮࣐㸰 ࠕ⡿ᅜ༡㒊ᆅ༊ᇶ‽༠ཬࡧྠ༠ᡤᒓᏛࡢホ౯㛵ࡍࡿㄪ ᰝ◊✲ࠖ یㄪᰝ◊✲ࡢᴫせ Ϩ 6RXWKHUQ$VVRFLDWLRQRI&ROOHJHVDQG6FKRROV㸦༡㒊ᆅ༊ᇶ‽༠㸧 ϩ (PRU\8QLYHUVLW\ Ϫ $JQHV6FKRWW&ROOHJH ϫ *HRUJLD,QVWLWXWHRI7HFKQRORJ\ Ϭ ㈨ᩱ⦅ ㈨ᩱ ࢡࣞࢹࢸ࣮ࢩࣙࣥ ホ౯ᇶ‽ ㈨ᩱ ࢡࣞࢹࢸ࣮ࢩࣙࣥ ᐇᡭ⥆ࡁ ㈨ᩱ ࢡࣞࢹࢸ࣮ࢩࣙࣥ ࣁࣥࢻࣈࢵࢡ ㄪᰝ◊✲ࢸ࣮࣐㸯 㐣ᖺᗘཷᑂᏛᑐࡍࡿㄪᰝ◊✲ یㄪᰝ◊✲ࡢᴫせ 㸬ㄪᰝ◊✲ࡢ᪨ ᖹᡂ 17(2005)ᖺᗘࡽᖹᡂ 22(2010)ᖺᗘࡲ࡛㸦௨ୗࠊ➨ 1 ࢧࢡࣝ㸧ホ౯ᶵᵓࡀᐇ ࡋࡓㄆドホ౯࠾࠸࡚ࠊከࡃࡢᣦࡀ࠶ࡗࡓㄢ㢟࡞ࡘ࠸࡚ㄪᰝ࣭◊✲ࡋࠊㄪᰝ⤖ᯝ ࢆࡲࡵࠊဨᏛ࡞ᑐࡋ࡚ࢭ࣑ࢼ࣮ࡸ༳ๅ≀ࡼࡾሗᥦ౪ࢆ⾜࠺ࠋ ࡲࡓࠊ➨ 1 ࢧࢡࣝホ౯ᶵᵓ࠾࠸࡚ㄆドホ౯ࢆཷᑂࡋࡓᏛᑐࡋࠊホ౯⤖ᯝࡢෆ ᐜᑐࡍࡿ⌮ゎࡸᏛ㐠Ⴀࡢᫎ≧ἣ࡞ࡘ࠸࡚ࡢ⪺ྲྀࡾㄪᰝࠊࣥࢣ࣮ࢺㄪᰝ࡞ ࢆ⾜࠸ࠊㄪᰝ⤖ᯝࢆࡲࡵࠊཷᑂᏛࡢㄆドホ౯⤖ᯝࡢά⏝≧ἣࢆᢕᥱࡋࡘࡘࠊࡑࡢ⤖ᯝ ࢆά⏝ࡋࠊᚋࡢㄆドホ౯ࡢᨵၿ㈨ࡍࡿࠋ 㸦㐣ᖺᗘཷᑂᏛᩘ᥎⛣㸧 㻌 ㄆドホ౯㻌 ϵϬ ホ౯㻌 㻌 㻝㻣 ᖺᗘ㻌 㻠㻌 㻙㻌 ϳϬ 㻌 㻝㻤 ᖺᗘ㻌 㻝㻢㻌 㻙㻌 ϲϬ 㻌 㻝㻥 ᖺᗘ㻌 㻟㻤㻌 㻙㻌 㻌 㻞㻜 ᖺᗘ㻌 㻡㻤㻌 㻙㻌 㻌 㻞㻝 ᖺᗘ㻌 㻣㻝㻌 㻝㻌 㻌 㻞㻞 ᖺᗘ㻌 㻤㻡㻌 㻠㻌 㻞㻣㻞㻌 㻡㻌 㻌 ྜィ㻌 ϱϬ ϰϬ ϯϬ ϮϬ ϭϬ Ϭ ㄆᐃ㻌 ϭϳᖺᗘ ϭϴᖺᗘ ㄆドホ౯ ϰ ϭϲ ϯϴ ᮲௳䛝㻌 ಖ␃㻌 ㄆᐃ㻌 ྜィ㻌 㻙㻌 㻙㻌 㻙㻌 㻠㻌 㻙㻌 㻙㻌 㻝㻢㻌 㻌 㻝㻣 ᖺᗘ㻌 㻠㻌 㻌 㻝㻤 ᖺᗘ㻌 㻝㻡㻌 㻝㻌 㻌 㻝㻥 ᖺᗘ㻌 㻟㻢㻌 㻝㻌 㻝㻌 㻙㻌 㻟㻤㻌 㻌 㻞㻜 ᖺᗘ㻌 㻠㻤㻌 㻡㻌 㻡㻌 㻙㻌 㻡㻤㻌 㻌 㻞㻝 ᖺᗘ㻌 㻠㻣㻌 㻝㻥㻌 㻡㻌 㻙㻌 㻣㻝㻌 㻌 㻞㻞 ᖺᗘ㻌 㻠㻥㻌 㻞㻢㻌 㻥㻌 ϵϬ ϴϬ ϳϬ ϲϬ ϱϬ ϰϬ ϯϬ ϮϬ ϭϬ Ϭ 㻝㻌 ᖺᗘูホ౯⤖ᯝෆヂ ϭϳᖺᗘ ϭϴᖺᗘ ϭϵᖺᗘ ϮϬᖺᗘ Ϯϭᖺᗘ ϭ ϱ ϱ ϵ ϭ ϭ ϱ ϭϵ Ϯϲ ϭϱ ϯϲ ϰϴ ϰϳ ϰϵ ㄆᐃ ᮲௳䛝 ㄆᐃ ϮϮᖺᗘ ϭ ಖ␃ ϰ ϭϵᖺᗘ ϮϬᖺᗘ ホ౯ 㸦ᖺᗘูホ౯⤖ᯝෆヂ㸧 㻌 㐣ᖺᗘཷᑂᏛᩘ᥎⛣ ϴϬ 7 㻤㻡㻌 ϱϴ Ϯϭᖺᗘ ϮϮᖺᗘ ϭ ϰ ϳϭ ϴϱ 㸬ㄪᰝࡢෆᐜཬࡧ᪉ἲ ձ㐣ᖺᗘཷᑂᏛࡢᣦ㡯ศᯒ ➨ 1 ࢧࢡࣝࡢᏛᶵ㛵ูㄆドホ౯ཬࡧホ౯ࡢホ౯⤖ᯝ࠾࠸࡚බ⾲ࡉࢀࡓᣦ㡯 ➼㸦ࠕඃࢀࡓⅬࠖࠕᨵၿࢆせࡍࡿⅬࠖࠕཧ⪃ពぢࠖ㸧ࡘ࠸࡚ࠊෆᐜࡸഴྥ࡞ࡢศᯒࢆ ⾜ࡗࡓࠋ ղࣥࢣ࣮ࢺㄪᰝࡢᐇ ➨ 1 ࢧࢡࣝࡢᏛᶵ㛵ูㄆドホ౯ཷᑂᏛࡢㄆドホ౯ᢸᙜ⪅ᑐࡋࠊྛᏛࡢㄆドホ ౯ཷᑂᚋࡢ≧ἣࡸ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯ᐇయไ࡞ࡘ࠸࡚グྡ㑅ᢥᘧᅇ⟅ཬࡧ⮬⏤グ㏙ࡽ ࡞ࡿࣥࢣ࣮ࢺㄪᰝࢆ࣓࣮ࣝ㓄ಙ࡚ᐇࡋࡓࠋ ճࣥࢱࣅ࣮ࣗㄪᰝࡢᐇ ࣥࢣ࣮ࢺㄪᰝᅇ⟅Ꮫࡢ࠺ࡕࠊᏛࡢཧ⪃࡞ࡿࡘ࠸࡚ࡣࠊඹ᭷ࢆᅗࡿࡓ ࡵ㏣ຍ࡛ࣥࢱࣅ࣮ࣗㄪᰝࢆᐇࡋࡓࠋ ͤࣥࢣ࣮ࢺㄪᰝಀࡿ⿵㊊㡯 㻌 ᐇᮇ㛫㻌 ᖹᡂ 㻞㻟㻔㻞㻜㻝㻝㻕ᖺ 㻝㻜 ᭶ 㻝㻝 ᪥䡚㻝㻝 ᭶ 㻝㻤 ᪥㻌 㻌 ㄪᰝᑐ㇟Ꮫᩘ㻌 㻌 ᅇ⟅Ꮫᩘ㻌 㻞㻣㻞㻌 ᅇ⟅⋡㻌 㻞㻡㻤㻌 㻥㻠㻚㻥㻑㻌 㸦ཷᑂᖺᗘูෆヂ㸧 㻌 ᅇ⟅Ꮫᩘ㻌 ཷᑂᏛᩘ㻌 ᅇ⟅⋡㻌 㻌 㻝㻣 ᖺᗘ㻌 㻠㻌 㻠㻌 㻝㻜㻜㻚㻜㻑㻌 㻌 㻝㻤 ᖺᗘ㻌 㻝㻡㻌 㻝㻢㻌 㻥㻟㻚㻤㻑㻌 㻌 㻝㻥 ᖺᗘ㻌 㻟㻣㻌 㻟㻤㻌 㻥㻣㻚㻠㻑㻌 㻌 㻞㻜 ᖺᗘ㻌 㻡㻟㻌 㻡㻤㻌 㻥㻝㻚㻠㻑㻌 㻌 㻞㻝 ᖺᗘ㻌 㻢㻥㻌 㻣㻝㻌 㻥㻣㻚㻞㻑㻌 㻌 㻞㻞 ᖺᗘ㻌 㻤㻜㻌 㻤㻡㻌 㻥㻠㻚㻝㻑㻌 ϰ ϰ ϭϳᖺᗘ ᅇ⟅Ꮫᩘ ཷᑂᏛᩘ ϭϱ ϭϲ ϭϴᖺᗘ ϯϳ ϯϴ ϭϵᖺᗘ ϱϯ ϮϬᖺᗘ ϱϴ ϲϵ ϳϭ Ϯϭᖺᗘ ϴϬ ϮϮᖺᗘ ϴϱ Ϭ ϮϬ ϰϬ ϲϬ 8 ϴϬ Ϩ ᣦ㡯➼ศᯒ⤖ᯝ ➨ 1 ࢧࢡࣝཷᑂࡋࡓᏛᑐࡋ࡚ࡢᣦ㡯➼ࡣࠊࠕඃࢀࡓⅬࠖࠕᨵၿࢆせࡍࡿⅬࠖ ࠕཧ⪃ពぢࠖࡢ࡚ࢆྜࢃࡏࡿ 2,727 ௳࠶ࡾࠊࡑࡢෆヂࡣࠊࠕඃࢀࡓⅬࠖࡀ 1,677 ௳ࠊ ࠕᨵၿࢆせࡍࡿⅬࠖࡀ 389 ௳ࠊࠕཧ⪃ពぢࠖࡀ 661 ௳࡛࠶ࡗࡓࠋ ྛᖺᗘ࠾࠸࡚ࠊᇶ‽ࡈࠕඃࢀࡓⅬࠖࠕᨵၿࢆせࡍࡿⅬࠖࠕཧ⪃ពぢࠖࡢᩘࢆ㞟ィ ࡋࠊ⾲ࡲࡵࡓࠋ ࡲࡓࠊᖺᗘࡈཷᑂᏛᩘࡀ␗࡞ࡿࡓࡵࠊᖺᗘࡈࡢᣦᩘࡢᖹᆒ್ࠊᇶ‽ࡈࡢᣦ ࡢᖹᆒ್ཬࡧ 1 Ꮫᙜࡓࡾࡢᣦᩘ㸦ᖺᗘูᖹᆒ㸧ࡶేࡏ࡚⾲ࡲࡵࡓࠋ ࠕඃࢀࡓⅬࠖࡘ࠸࡚ 㻌 䛆ཧ⪃䛇➨ 㻝 䝃䜲䜽䝹䛾Ꮫホ౯ᇶ‽㻌 ホ౯ᶵᵓ࡛ࡣࠕ࣭┠ⓗἢࡗ 㻌 ᇶ‽ 㻝㻌 ᘓᏛ䛾⢭⚄䞉Ꮫ䛾ᇶᮏ⌮ᛕཬ䜃䞉┠ⓗ㻌 ࡓไᗘ࣭ࢩࢫࢸ࣒➼ࡀ༑ศᩚഛࡉ 㻌 ᇶ‽ 㻞㻌 ᩍ⫱◊✲⤌⧊㻌 ࢀ࡚࠾ࡾࠊ༑ศᶵ⬟ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠖ 㻌 ᇶ‽ 㻟㻌 ᩍ⫱ㄢ⛬㻌 㡯ཬࡧࠕᏛࡢᶍ⠊࡞ࡿྲྀ⤌ࡳࠖ 㻌 ᇶ‽ 㻠㻌 Ꮫ⏕㻌 㛵ࡋ࡚ࠕඃࢀࡓⅬࠖࡋ࡚࠶ࡆ࡚ 㻌 ᇶ‽ 㻡㻌 ᩍဨ㻌 㻌 ᇶ‽ 㻢㻌 ⫋ဨ㻌 㻌 ᇶ‽ 㻣㻌 ⟶⌮㐠Ⴀ㻌 㻌 ᇶ‽ 㻤㻌 ㈈ົ㻌 㻌 ᇶ‽ 㻥㻌 ᩍ⫱◊✲⎔ቃ㻌 㻌 ᇶ‽ 㻝㻜㻌 ♫㐃ᦠ㻌 㻌 ᇶ‽ 㻝㻝㻌 ♫ⓗ㈐ົ㻌 㻌 ≉グ㡯㻌 ࠸ࡿࠋ ➨ 1 ࢧࢡ࡛ࣝࠕඃࢀࡓⅬࠖࡀ᭱ ࡶከࡗࡓᇶ‽ࡣࠕᇶ‽ 10㸬♫㐃 ᦠ࡛ࠖࠊ316 ௳࠶ࡗࡓࠋ⥆࠸࡚ࠕᇶ ‽ 4㸬Ꮫ⏕ࠖࡀ 284 ௳ࠋࠕᇶ‽ 3㸬 ᩍ⫱ㄢ⛬ࠖࡢ 245 ௳⥆࠸ࡓࠋ1 Ꮫᙜࡓࡾࡢᩘࡘ࠸࡚ࡣࠊᖹᡂ 18(2006)ᖺᗘ௨㝆ࠊᖺࠎᩘࡀῶᑡࡋ ࡚࠸ࡿࡀࠊ࡚ࡢᏛࢆᖹᆒࡍࡿ 1 ᏛᙜࡓࡾࡢࠕඃࢀࡓⅬࠖࡣ 6.17 ௳࠶ࡗࡓࠋ ࠕᇶ‽ 10㸬♫㐃ᦠࠖࡘ࠸࡚ࡣࠊබ㛤ㅮᗙࡢᐇࡸ⮬య࡞ࡢㅮᖌὴ㐵ࠊࢥࣥࢯ ࣮ࢩ࣒࡞ࡼࡿ㏆㞄Ꮫࡢ㐃ᦠࡸᴗࡢඹྠ◊✲ࠊᅗ᭩㤋ࡸయ⫱㤋࡞ࡢタ㛤 ᨺࠊᏛ⏕ࡼࡿࡉࡲࡊࡲ࡞࣎ࣛࣥࢸάື࡞ከࡃࡢࠕඃࢀࡓⅬࠖࢆྲྀୖࡆࡓࠋ ࠕᇶ‽ 4㸬Ꮫ⏕ࠖࡘ࠸࡚ࡣࠊᑟධᩍ⫱ࡸ⿵⩦ᩍ⫱࡞ࡼࡿᏛ⩦ᨭࠊᐇࡋࡓዡᏛ ไᗘࠊᏛ⏕ࡢពぢࢆࡃࡳୖࡆ࡚Ꮫ⏕ࢧ࣮ࣅࢫᫎࡉࡏࡿ⤌ࡳࠊ㈨᱁ྲྀᚓᨭࡸᑵ⫋ᨭ ࡞ࢆࠕඃࢀࡓⅬࠖࡋ࡚ྲྀୖࡆࡓࠋ ࠕᇶ‽ 3㸬ᩍ⫱ㄢ⛬ࠖࡘ࠸࡚ࡣࠊᘓᏛࡢ⢭⚄ࡸ࣭┠ⓗࢆල⌧ࡍࡿࡓࡵࡢᩍ⫱ㄢ ⛬ࡢ⦅ᡂࡸ⛉┠ࡢタ⨨ཬࡧᩍ⫱┠ⓗࡢ㐩ᡂ≧ἣࢆⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯ࡍࡿࡓࡵࡢࡉࡲࡊࡲ࡞ດຊ࡞ ࢆࠕඃࢀࡓⅬࠖࡋ࡚ྲྀୖࡆࡓࠋ 11 ᖺᗘูᇶ‽ู ඃࢀࡓⅬࡢᣦᩘ 㻌 ᖺᗘ㻌 䠸㻌 ᇶ‽㻌 㻝㻌 㻞㻌 㻟㻌 㻠㻌 㻡㻌 㻢㻌 㻣㻌 㻤㻌 㻥㻌 㻝㻜㻌 㻝㻝㻌 ᖺᗘูྜィ㻌 㻌 㻝㻣 ᖺᗘ㻌 㻟㻌 㻟㻌 㻤㻌 㻠㻌 㻣㻌 㻠㻌 㻟㻌 㻠㻌 㻝㻌 㻠㻌 㻝㻌 㻠㻞㻌 㻌 㻝㻤 ᖺᗘ㻌 㻝㻣㻌 㻟㻡㻌 㻟㻢㻌 㻞㻤㻌 㻞㻝㻌 㻝㻝㻌 㻝㻜㻌 㻝㻝㻌 㻝㻟㻌 㻞㻢㻌 㻝㻢㻌 㻞㻞㻠㻌 㻌 㻝㻥 ᖺᗘ㻌 㻟㻞㻌 㻟㻜㻌 㻡㻢㻌 㻣㻠㻌 㻠㻝㻌 㻞㻜㻌 㻟㻜㻌 㻞㻡㻌 㻟㻡㻌 㻢㻥㻌 㻞㻟㻌 㻠㻟㻡㻌 㻌 㻞㻜 ᖺᗘ㻌 㻞㻣㻌 㻟㻤㻌 㻡㻜㻌 㻣㻜㻌 㻞㻤㻌 㻞㻣㻌 㻝㻡㻌 㻞㻞㻌 㻟㻤㻌 㻣㻟㻌 㻝㻣㻌 㻠㻜㻡㻌 㻌 㻞㻝 ᖺᗘ㻌 㻞㻤㻌 㻞㻣㻌 㻠㻜㻌 㻡㻟㻌 㻝㻟㻌 㻝㻢㻌 㻢㻌 㻥㻌 㻞㻝㻌 㻤㻟㻌 㻝㻝㻌 㻟㻜㻣㻌 㻌 㻞㻞 ᖺᗘ㻌 㻝㻣㻌 㻝㻢㻌 㻡㻡㻌 㻡㻡㻌 㻝㻥㻌 㻣㻌 㻟㻌 㻢㻌 㻝㻢㻌 㻢㻝㻌 㻥㻌 㻞㻢㻠㻌 㻌 ᇶ‽ูྜィ㻌 㻝㻞㻠㻌 㻝㻠㻥㻌 㻞㻠㻡㻌 㻞㻤㻠㻌 㻝㻞㻥㻌 㻤㻡㻌 㻢㻣㻌 㻣㻣㻌 㻝㻞㻠㻌 㻟㻝㻢㻌 㻣㻣㻌 㻝㻘㻢㻣㻣㻌 㻡㻌 㻢㻌 㻣㻌 㻤㻌 㻥㻌 㻝㻜㻌 ᖺᗘูᇶ‽ู ඃࢀࡓⅬࡢᖹᆒᣦᩘ 㻌 ᖺᗘ㻌 䠸㻌 ᇶ‽㻌 㻝㻌 㻞㻌 㻟㻌 㻠㻌 㻝㻝㻌 ᖺᗘูᖹᆒ㻌 㻌 㻝㻣 ᖺᗘ㻌 㻜㻚㻣㻡㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻣㻡㻌 㻌 㻞㻚㻜㻜㻌 㻌 㻝㻚㻜㻜㻌 㻌 㻝㻚㻣㻡㻌 㻌 㻝㻚㻜㻜㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻣㻡㻌 㻌 㻝㻚㻜㻜㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻞㻡㻌 㻌 㻝㻚㻜㻜㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻞㻡㻌 㻝㻜㻚㻡㻜㻌 㻌 㻝㻤 ᖺᗘ㻌 㻝㻚㻜㻢㻌 㻌 㻞㻚㻝㻥㻌 㻌 㻞㻚㻞㻡㻌 㻌 㻝㻚㻣㻡㻌 㻌 㻝㻚㻟㻝㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻢㻥㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻢㻟㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻢㻥㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻤㻝㻌 㻌 㻝㻚㻢㻟㻌 㻌 㻝㻚㻜㻜㻌 㻝㻠㻚㻜㻜㻌 㻌 㻝㻥 ᖺᗘ㻌 㻜㻚㻤㻠㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻣㻥㻌 㻌 㻝㻚㻠㻣㻌 㻌 㻝㻚㻥㻡㻌 㻌 㻝㻚㻜㻤㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻡㻟㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻣㻥㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻢㻢㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻥㻞㻌 㻌 㻝㻚㻤㻞㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻢㻝㻌 㻝㻝㻚㻠㻡㻌 㻌 㻞㻜 ᖺᗘ㻌 㻜㻚㻠㻣㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻢㻢㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻤㻢㻌 㻌 㻝㻚㻞㻝㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻠㻤㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻠㻣㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻞㻢㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻟㻤㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻢㻢㻌 㻌 㻝㻚㻞㻢㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻞㻥㻌 㻢㻚㻥㻤㻌 㻌 㻌 㻞㻝 ᖺᗘ㻌 㻜㻚㻟㻥㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻟㻤㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻡㻢㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻣㻡㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻝㻤㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻞㻟㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻜㻤㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻝㻟㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻟㻜㻌 㻌 㻝㻚㻝㻣㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻝㻡㻌 㻠㻚㻟㻞㻌 㻌 㻌 㻞㻞 ᖺᗘ㻌 㻜㻚㻞㻜㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻝㻥㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻢㻡㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻢㻡㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻞㻞㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻜㻤㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻜㻠㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻜㻣㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻝㻥㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻣㻞㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻝㻝㻌 㻟㻚㻝㻝㻌 㻌 㻌 ᇶ‽ูᖹᆒ㻌 㻜㻚㻠㻢㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻡㻡㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻥㻜㻌 㻌 㻝㻚㻜㻠㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻠㻣㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻟㻝㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻞㻡㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻞㻤㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻠㻢㻌 㻌 㻝㻚㻝㻢㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻞㻤㻌 㻢㻚㻝㻣㻌 㻌 ࠕᨵၿࢆせࡍࡿⅬࠖࡘ࠸࡚ ホ౯ᶵᵓ࡛ࡣࠕ࣭┠ⓗἢࡗࡓไᗘ࣭ࢩࢫࢸ࣒➼ࡢᩚഛࡀ༑ศ࡛࠶ࡾࠊࢇ ᶵ⬟ࡋ࡚࠸࡞࠸ࠖ㡯ཬࡧࠕ㛵㐃ἲ௧ゐࡍࡿࠖࠕ⌧≧ࡢࡲࡲ࡛ࡣᏛ㐠Ⴀᨭ㞀ࢆࡁ ࡓࡍ㔜࡞ഛ㡯ࠖࠕᏛ⏕ࡸࢫࢸ࣮ࢡ࣍ࣝࢲ࣮ᑐࡋ࡚┈ࢆ⏕ࡌᚓࡿ㡯ࠖ࡞ 㛵ࡋ࡚ࠕᨵၿࢆせࡍࡿⅬࠖࡋ࡚ᣦࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ ➨ 1 ࢧࢡ࡛ࣝࠕᨵၿࢆせࡍࡿⅬࠖࡢᣦࡀ᭱ࡶከࡗࡓᇶ‽ࡣࠕᇶ‽ 7㸬⟶⌮㐠Ⴀࠖ ࡛࠶ࡾࠊ104 ௳ࡢᣦࡀ࠶ࡗࡓࠋ⥆࠸࡚ࠕᇶ‽ 3㸬ᩍ⫱ㄢ⛬ࠖࡀ 79 ௳ࠋࠕᇶ‽ 8㸬㈈ົࠖ ࡢ 68 ௳⥆࠸ࡓࠋ1 Ꮫᙜࡓࡾࡢᣦᩘࡘ࠸࡚ࡣࠊᖺࠎቑຍࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࡀࠊ࡚ࡢᏛࢆ ᖹᆒࡍࡿ 1 ᏛᙜࡓࡾࡢࠕᨵၿࢆせࡍࡿⅬࠖࡣ 1.43 ௳ࡔࡗࡓࠋ ࠕᇶ‽ 7㸬⟶⌮㐠Ⴀࠖࡘ࠸࡚ࡣࠊ⌮࣭ホ㆟ဨࡘ࠸࡚ࠊࡑࡢ㐠Ⴀ᪉ἲࠊ⌮ࠊ ホ㆟ဨཬࡧ┘ࡢᙺࡸฟᖍ≧ἣࠊᐤ㝃⾜Ⅽ࡞ࡢㅖつᐃࡢ㐪࡞ࡘ࠸࡚ࠕᨵၿࢆせ ࡍࡿⅬࠖࡋ࡚ᣦࡋࡓࠋ࡞࡛ࡶࠊ⌮࣭ホ㆟ဨࡢ㐠Ⴀ᪉ἲ㛵ࡋ࡚ࠊ⚾❧Ꮫᰯἲ ➨ 42 ᮲ཬࡧ➨ 46 ᮲ゐࡍࡿ㡯ࡘ࠸࡚ࡣࠊࠕᨵၿࢆせࡍࡿⅬࠖᣦࡋࡓୖ࡛ࠊࡑ ࡢᨵၿ≧ἣࡘ࠸࡚ࠊᮇ᪥ࡲ࡛ᨵၿሗ࿌᭩ࢆᥦฟࡍࡿࡼ࠺᮲௳ࢆࡋࡓࠋ ࠕᇶ‽ 3㸬ᩍ⫱ㄢ⛬ࠖࡘ࠸࡚ࡣࠊᖹᡂ 20(2008)ᖺᗘࡽᛴ⃭ከࡃ࡞ࡗࡓࠋࡇࢀࡣࠊ ᖹᡂ 19(2007)ᖺ 7 ᭶ 31 ᪥ࡢᏛタ⨨ᇶ‽ࡢᨵṇ㸦Ꮫタ⨨ᇶ‽➼ࡢ୍㒊ࢆᨵṇࡍࡿ┬ ௧㸦ᖹᡂ 19 ᖺᩥ㒊⛉Ꮫ┬௧➨ 22 ྕ㸧㸧ࡀ࡞せᅉ࡛࠶ࡿࠋ࡞࡛ࡶࠊࠕᩍ⫱◊✲ୖࡢ┠ ⓗࡢ᫂☜㸦ᏛࡣࠊᏛ㒊ࠊᏛ⛉ཪࡣㄢ⛬ࡈࠊேᮦࡢ㣴ᡂ㛵ࡍࡿ┠ⓗࡑࡢࡢᩍ⫱ ◊✲ୖࡢ┠ⓗࢆᏛ๎➼ᐃࡵࠊබ⾲ࡍࡿࡶࡢࡍࡿࡇࠋ 㸦➨ 2 ᮲ࡢ 2 㛵ಀ㸧 㸧 ࠖ㛵ࡋ࡚ࠊ ホ౯ᶵᵓ࡛ࡣཎ๎ࡋ࡚Ꮫ๎ࡢグ㍕ࢆồࡵࡓࡓࡵࠊேᮦ㣴ᡂ┠ⓗࡸᩍ⫱┠ⓗࢆᏛ⏕౽ぴ 12 ࡸࢩࣛࣂࢫࡢࡳグ㍕ࡋ࡚࠸ࡓཷᑂᏛᑐࡋ࡚ࡣࠕᨵၿࢆせࡍࡿⅬࠖࡋ࡚ᣦࡋࡓࠋ ࡲࡓࠊྠ┬௧࠶ࡿࠕᡂ⦼ホ౯ᇶ‽➼ࡢ᫂♧➼ࠖࡘ࠸࡚ࡶᮍᑐᛂࡢཷᑂᏛᑐࡋ࡚ࠕᨵ ၿࢆせࡍࡿⅬࠖࡋ࡚ᣦࡋࡓࠋࡑࡢࡣࠊ༢ไᗘࡢᐇ㉁ࡢほⅬࡽࠊ1 ᖺ㛫ᒚ ಟⓏ㘓ࡀ࡛ࡁࡿ༢ᩘࡢୖ㝈ࡀタᐃࡉࢀ࡚࠸࡞࠸ሙྜࠕᨵၿࢆせࡍࡿⅬࠖࡋ࡚ᣦࡋ ࡓࠋ࡞࠾ࠊᖹᡂ 20 (2008)ᖺᗘ௨㝆ࡢ 3 ᖺ㛫࡛๓㏙ࡢ 3 Ⅼ࡛ࡢᣦࡣ 79 ௳୰ 67 ௳(84.8%) ࢆ༨ࡵ࡚࠸ࡓࠋ ࠕᇶ‽8㸬㈈ົࠖࡘ࠸࡚ࡣࠊᐃဨᮍ㊊క࠺Ꮫ⏕⏕ᚐ➼⣡㔠ࡢῶᑡࡼࡿ㈈ົᇶ ┙ཬࡧ㈈ົ≧ἣၥ㢟ࡀ࠶ࡿሙྜࡸᨭฟ㉸㐣ࡼࡿᨭࡢࣂࣛࣥࢫࢆḞ࠸ࡓ㐠Ⴀ࡞ࡘ ࠸࡚ࠕᨵၿࢆせࡍࡿⅬࠖࡋ࡚ᣦࡋࡓࠋ68௳୰61௳ࡀᖹᡂ21(2009)ᖺᗘཬࡧᖹᡂ22(2010) ᖺᗘཷᑂᏛࡢᣦ࡛࠶ࡿࠋ࡞࠾ࠊ㈈ົ≧ἣࡸᨭࡢࣂࣛࣥࢫⴭࡋ࠸ၥ㢟ࡀ࠶ࡗࡓሙ ྜࡣࠊุᐃࡢಖ␃ࡸᨵၿሗ࿌᭩ࡢᥦฟࢆồࡵࡓࠋ ࡞࠾ࠊࠕᇶ‽ࢆ‶ࡓࡋ࡚࠸࡞࠸ุࠖᐃࡋࡓせᅉ࡞ࡗࡓᣦ㡯ཬࡧᨵၿሗ࿌᭩ࢆᥦ ฟࡍࡿࡼ࠺᮲௳ࢆࡍせᅉ࡞ࡗࡓᣦ㡯ࡘ࠸࡚ࡣู㏵ࡲࡵࡓࠋ ᖺᗘูᇶ‽ู ᨵၿࢆせࡍࡿⅬࡢᣦᩘ 㻌 ᖺᗘ㻌 䠸㻌 ᇶ‽㻌 㻝㻌 㻞㻌 㻟㻌 㻠㻌 㻡㻌 㻢㻌 㻣㻌 㻤㻌 㻥㻌 㻝㻜㻌 㻝㻝㻌 ᖺᗘูྜィ㻌 㻌 㻝㻣 ᖺᗘ㻌 㻙㻌 㻙㻌 㻙㻌 㻙㻌 㻙㻌 㻙㻌 㻙㻌 㻙㻌 㻙㻌 㻙㻌 㻙㻌 㻜㻌 㻌 㻝㻤 ᖺᗘ㻌 㻙㻌 㻝㻌 㻙㻌 㻙㻌 㻙㻌 㻙㻌 㻙㻌 㻙㻌 㻙㻌 㻙㻌 㻙㻌 㻝㻌 㻌 㻝㻥 ᖺᗘ㻌 㻙㻌 㻟㻌 㻞㻌 㻝㻌 㻠㻌 㻙㻌 㻟㻌 㻞㻌 㻙㻌 㻙㻌 㻙㻌 㻝㻡㻌 㻌 㻞㻜 ᖺᗘ㻌 㻙㻌 㻠㻌 㻞㻟㻌 㻠㻌 㻝㻜㻌 㻙㻌 㻝㻥㻌 㻡㻌 㻞㻌 㻙㻌 㻙㻌 㻢㻣㻌 㻌 㻞㻝 ᖺᗘ㻌 㻙㻌 㻠㻌 㻞㻟㻌 㻣㻌 㻝㻞㻌 㻝㻌 㻞㻣㻌 㻞㻜㻌 㻥㻌 㻙㻌 㻟㻌 㻝㻜㻢㻌 㻌 㻞㻞 ᖺᗘ㻌 㻙㻌 㻝㻠㻌 㻟㻝㻌 㻝㻠㻌 㻞㻜㻌 㻣㻌 㻡㻡㻌 㻠㻝㻌 㻝㻟㻌 㻙㻌 㻡㻌 㻞㻜㻜㻌 㻌 ᇶ‽ูྜィ㻌 㻞㻢㻌 㻣㻥㻌 㻞㻢㻌 㻠㻢㻌 㻤㻌 㻝㻜㻠㻌 㻢㻤㻌 㻞㻠㻌 㻤㻌 㻟㻤㻥㻌 㻜㻌 㻜㻌 ᖺᗘูᇶ‽ู ᨵၿࢆせࡍࡿⅬࡢᖹᆒᣦᩘ 㻌 ᖺᗘ㻌 䠸㻌 ᇶ‽㻌 㻝㻌 㻞㻌 㻟㻌 㻠㻌 㻡㻌 㻢㻌 㻣㻌 㻤㻌 㻥㻌 㻝㻜㻌 㻝㻝㻌 㻌 㻝㻣 ᖺᗘ㻌 㻙㻌 㻙㻌 㻙㻌 㻙㻌 㻙㻌 㻙㻌 㻙㻌 㻙㻌 㻙㻌 㻙㻌 㻙㻌 㻜㻌 㻌 㻌 㻝㻤 ᖺᗘ㻌 㻙㻌 㻜㻚㻜㻢㻌 㻌 㻙㻌 㻙㻌 㻙㻌 㻙㻌 㻙㻌 㻙㻌 㻙㻌 㻙㻌 㻙㻌 㻜㻚㻜㻢㻌 㻌 㻌 㻝㻥 ᖺᗘ㻌 㻙㻌 㻜㻚㻜㻤㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻜㻡㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻜㻟㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻝㻝㻌 㻌 㻙㻌 㻜㻚㻜㻤㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻜㻡㻌 㻌 㻙㻌 㻙㻌 㻙㻌 㻜㻚㻟㻥㻌 㻌 㻌 㻞㻜 ᖺᗘ㻌 㻙㻌 㻜㻚㻜㻣㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻠㻜㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻜㻣㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻝㻣㻌 㻌 㻙㻌 㻜㻚㻟㻟㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻜㻥㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻜㻟㻌 㻌 㻙㻌 㻙㻌 㻝㻚㻝㻢㻌 㻌 㻌 㻞㻝 ᖺᗘ㻌 㻙㻌 㻜㻚㻜㻢㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻟㻞㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻝㻜㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻝㻣㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻜㻝㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻟㻤㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻞㻤㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻝㻟㻌 㻌 㻙㻌 㻜㻚㻜㻠㻌 㻝㻚㻠㻥㻌 㻌 㻌 㻞㻞 ᖺᗘ㻌 㻙㻌 㻜㻚㻝㻢㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻟㻢㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻝㻢㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻞㻠㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻜㻤㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻢㻡㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻠㻤㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻝㻡㻌 㻌 㻙㻌 㻜㻚㻜㻢㻌 㻞㻚㻟㻡㻌 㻌 㻌 ᇶ‽ูᖹᆒ㻌 㻜㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻜㻟㻌 㻝㻚㻠㻟㻌 㻌 㻜㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻝㻜㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻞㻥㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻝㻜㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻝㻣㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻜㻟㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻟㻤㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻞㻡㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻜㻥㻌 㻌 13 ᖺᗘูᖹᆒ㻌 ಖ␃࡞ࡗࡓᇶ‽せᅉ 㻌 ᖺᗘ㻌 䠸㻌 ᇶ‽㻌 㻝㻌 㻞㻌 㻟㻌 㻠㻌 㻡㻌 㻢㻌 㻣㻌 㻤㻌 㻥㻌 㻝㻜㻌 㻝㻝㻌 㻌 㻝㻣 ᖺᗘ㻌 㻙㻌 㻙㻌 㻙㻌 㻙㻌 㻙㻌 㻙㻌 㻙㻌 㻙㻌 㻙㻌 㻙㻌 㻙㻌 㻜㻌 㻌 㻝㻤 ᖺᗘ㻌 㻙㻌 㻙㻌 㻙㻌 㻙㻌 㻙㻌 㻙㻌 㻙㻌 㻙㻌 㻙㻌 㻙㻌 㻙㻌 㻜㻌 㻌 㻝㻥 ᖺᗘ㻌 㻙㻌 㻙㻌 㻙㻌 㻙㻌 㻙㻌 㻙㻌 㻝㻌 㻝㻌 㻙㻌 㻙㻌 㻙㻌 㻞㻌 㻌 㻞㻜 ᖺᗘ㻌 㻙㻌 㻙㻌 㻙㻌 㻙㻌 㻟㻌 㻙㻌 㻟㻌 㻝㻌 㻙㻌 㻙㻌 㻙㻌 㻣㻌 㻌 㻞㻝 ᖺᗘ㻌 㻙㻌 㻝㻌 㻞㻌 㻟㻌 㻙㻌 㻞㻌 㻞㻌 㻙㻌 㻙㻌 㻙㻌 㻝㻜㻌 㻌 㻞㻞 ᖺᗘ㻌 㻙㻌 㻞㻌 㻝㻌 㻝㻌 㻠㻌 㻙㻌 㻢㻌 㻠㻌 㻙㻌 㻙㻌 㻙㻌 㻝㻤㻌 㻌 ྜィ㻌 㻟㻌 㻝㻌 㻟㻌 㻝㻜㻌 㻝㻞㻌 㻤㻌 ϳ ϲ ϱ ϰ ϯ 㻜㻌 㻜㻌 ϭ Ϭ ϭϳᖺᗘ ϭϴᖺᗘ ϭϵᖺᗘ 㻜㻌 Ϯ 㻜㻌 㻙㻌 ᇶ‽ ᇶ‽ ᇶ‽ ᇶ‽ ᇶ‽ ᇶ‽ ᇶ‽ ᇶ‽ ᇶ‽ ᇶ‽ ᇶ‽ ϭ Ϯ ϯ ϰ ϱ ϲ ϳ ϴ ϵ ϭϬ ϭϭ ϭ ϭ ϯ ϯ ϭ Ϯ ϯ Ϯ Ϯ ϭ ϰ ϲ ϰ ϮϬᖺᗘ Ϯϭᖺᗘ ϭ ϮϮᖺᗘ Ϯ ϭ ಖ␃ุᐃࡉࢀࡓᏛᑐࡍࡿ࡞ᨵၿ㡯 ᇶ‽ 2 ࣭ពᛮỴᐃᶵ㛵ࡢᏛ๎ୖࡢ⨨ࡅࡀ᫂☜ࠋ ࣭ᩍ㣴ᩍ⫱ࡢ⤌⧊ୖࡢᥐ⨨ࡀ༑ศࠋ ࣭つᐃୖࠊᩍᤵࡢᵓᡂဨ࡛࠶ࡗ࡚ࡣ࡞ࡽ࡞࠸ே≀ࡀᵓᡂဨ࡞ࡗ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ ࣭ᩍᏛୖࡢ⟶⌮యไࡀ༑ศࠋ ᇶ‽ 3 ࣭ᩍ⫱┠ⓗࡀᏛ๎᫂♧ࡉࢀ࡚࠸࡞࠸ࠋ ࣭ᒚಟⓏ㘓ࡢୖ㝈ࡀᐃࡵࡽࢀ࡚࠸࡞࠸ࠋ ࣭ᡂ⦼ホ౯ᇶ‽ࡀ᫂☜࡛࠶ࡿࠋ ᇶ‽ 4 ࣭ᐃဨᮍ㊊ࠋ ᇶ‽ 5 ࣭Ꮫタ⨨ᇶ‽࡛ᐃࡵࡿᚲせᑓ௵ᩍဨᩘࡢ㊊ࠋ ࣭Ꮫタ⨨ᇶ‽࡛ᐃࡵࡿᚲせᑓ௵ᩍᤵᩘࡢ㊊ࠋ ࣭ᩍဨࡢ᥇⏝࣭᪼௵つ⛬ࡀᮍᩚഛࠋ 14 㻜㻌 ྜィ㻌 㻟㻣㻌 ࣭ᩍဨࡢᩍ⫱◊✲άືࡢᨭయไࡀ༑ศࠋ ࣭⟶⌮ᰤ㣴ኈᏛᰯᣦᐃつ๎ᐃࡵࡽࢀࡓᑓ௵ࡢຓᡭࡢᩘࡢ㊊ࠋ ࣭⤌⧊ⓗ࡞ FD άືࡀᐇࡉࢀ࡚࠸࡞࠸ࠋ ᇶ‽ 7 ࣭┘ᰝࡀ㐺ษࠋ ࣭┘ࡀ⫋ົࡸ⫋㈐ࢆᯝࡓࡋ࡚࠾ࡽࡎ㐺ษࠋ ࣭┘ࡀࠕᏛᰯἲேࡢᐤ㝃⾜Ⅽཬࡧᐤ㝃⾜Ⅽࡢኚ᭦ࡢㄆྍ㛵ࡍࡿᑂᰝᇶ‽ࠖࡢ᮲௳ࢆ‶ ࡓࡋ࡚࠸࡞࠸ࠋ ࣭ᐤ㝃⾜Ⅽ㐪ࠋ ࣭⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯ࡢ⤖ᯝࡀᮍබ⾲ࠋ ࣭ㄆドホ౯ࢆཷࡅࡿࡲ࡛⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯ࡀᮍᐇࠋ ࣭⌮࣭ホ㆟ဨ࡞ࡢḞဨࠋ ࣭≉ᐃࡢ⌮࣭ホ㆟ဨ࣭┘ࡀ⌮ཬࡧホ㆟ဨࢆḞᖍࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ ࣭ᙺဨࡢ㑅௵ࡀつᐃ㏻ࡾᐇࡉࢀ࡚࠸࡞࠸ࠋ ࣭⚾❧Ꮫᰯἲᐃࡵࡿ┈┦㡯ࡢゐࠋ ࣭Ỵ⟬ࡘ࠸࡚ࠊ⌮ࡢᢎㄆᚋホ㆟ဨሗ࿌ࡋពぢࢆồࡵ࡚࠸࡞࠸ࡓࡵ⚾❧Ꮫᰯἲ ➨ 46 ᮲ゐࠋ ࣭⌮ࠊホ㆟ဨ࡞ㅎࡿࡼ࠺ᐃࡵࡽࢀ࡚࠸ࡿ㡯㛵ࡋ࡚ࠊㅎၥࡀ⾜ࢃࢀ࡚࠸࡞࠸ࠋ ࣭ண⟬ཬࡧ㔜せ࡞㈨⏘ࡢฎศࠊᴗィ⏬࡞ࡘ࠸࡚ࠊ⌮࡛Ỵᐃࡍࡿ๓ࠊ࠶ࡽࡌ ࡵホ㆟ဨࡢពぢࢆ⪺࠸࡚࠸࡞࠸ࡓࡵ⚾❧Ꮫᰯἲ➨ 42 ᮲ゐࠋ ࣭㔜せ࡞つ⛬ࡢไᐃཬࡧᨵᗫࡀ⌮ࡢ㆟ࢆ⤒ࡎ㐠⏝ࡉࢀ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ ᇶ‽ 8 ࣭㐺ษ࡞ィฎ⌮ࠋ ࣭እ㒊㈨㔠ࡢᑟධࡘ࠸࡚ດຊࡋ࡚࠸࡞࠸ࠋ ࣭ᨭࡢࣂࣛࣥࢫࢆḞࡃ࡞㈈ົ≧ἣၥ㢟ࡀ࠶ࡿࠋ ࣭බ㛤ࡉࢀ࡚࠸ࡿ㈈ົሗࡀ⌮࡞࡛ᢎㄆࡉࢀࡓࡶࡢ␗࡞ࡿࠋ ᨵၿሗ࿌᭩ࢆᥦฟࡍࡿ᮲௳ࢆࡋࡓᇶ‽せᅉ 㻌 ᖺᗘ㻌 䠸㻌 ᇶ‽㻌 㻝㻌 㻞㻌 㻟㻌 㻠㻌 㻡㻌 㻢㻌 㻣㻌 㻤㻌 㻥㻌 㻝㻜㻌 㻝㻝㻌 㻌 㻝㻣 ᖺᗘ㻌 㻙㻌 㻙㻌 㻙㻌 㻙㻌 㻙㻌 㻙㻌 㻙㻌 㻙㻌 㻙㻌 㻙㻌 㻙㻌 㻜㻌 㻌 㻝㻤 ᖺᗘ㻌 㻙㻌 㻙㻌 㻙㻌 㻙㻌 㻙㻌 㻙㻌 㻙㻌 㻙㻌 㻙㻌 㻙㻌 㻝㻌 㻌 㻝㻥 ᖺᗘ㻌 㻙㻌 㻙㻌 㻙㻌 㻙㻌 㻙㻌 㻙㻌 㻝㻌 㻙㻌 㻙㻌 㻙㻌 㻙㻌 㻝㻌 㻌 㻞㻜 ᖺᗘ㻌 㻙㻌 㻙㻌 㻙㻌 㻙㻌 㻙㻌 㻙㻌 㻠㻌 㻝㻌 㻙㻌 㻙㻌 㻙㻌 㻡㻌 㻌 㻞㻝 ᖺᗘ㻌 㻙㻌 㻙㻌 㻙㻌 㻙㻌 㻙㻌 㻙㻌 㻝㻠㻌 㻠㻌 㻝㻌 㻙㻌 㻙㻌 㻞㻜㻌 㻌 㻞㻞 ᖺᗘ㻌 㻙㻌 㻙㻌 㻙㻌 㻙㻌 㻝㻡㻌 㻝㻠㻌 㻝㻌 㻙㻌 㻙㻌 㻟㻟㻌 㻌 ྜィ㻌 㻟㻠㻌 㻝㻥㻌 㻞㻌 㻜㻌 㻜㻌 㻜㻌 㻝㻌 㻝㻌 㻞㻌 㻞㻌 㻞㻌 15 㻜㻌 㻜㻌 㻝㻌 ྜィ㻌 㻢㻜㻌 ϭϲ ϭϰ ϭϮ ϭϬ ϴ ϲ ϰ Ϯ Ϭ ᇶ‽ ᇶ‽ ᇶ‽ ᇶ‽ ᇶ‽ ᇶ‽ ᇶ‽ ᇶ‽ ᇶ‽ ᇶ‽ ᇶ‽ ϭ Ϯ ϯ ϰ ϱ ϲ ϳ ϴ ϵ ϭϬ ϭϭ ϭϳᖺᗘ ϭϴᖺᗘ ϭ ϭϵᖺᗘ ϭ ϮϬᖺᗘ ϰ Ϯϭᖺᗘ ϮϮᖺᗘ ϭ Ϯ ϭ ϭϰ ϰ ϭ ϭϱ ϭϰ ϭ ϭ ᨵၿሗ࿌᭩ࢆᥦฟࡍࡿ᮲௳ࢆࡋࡓᏛᑐࡍࡿ࡞ᨵၿ㡯 ᇶ‽ 4 ࣭᪂タᏛ⛉ࡢᐃဨ㉸㐣ࠋ ࣭᪂タᏛ⛉ࡢᐃဨᮍ㊊ࠋ ᇶ‽ 5 ࣭Ꮫタ⨨ᇶ‽࡛ᐃࡵࡿᚲせᑓ௵ᩍဨᩘࡢ㊊㸦╔௵ᚅࡕ㸧ࠋ ࣭⟶⌮ᰤ㣴ኈᏛᰯᣦᐃつ๎ᐃࡵࡽࢀࡓᑓ௵ຓᡭࡢᩘ㊊ࠋ ᇶ‽ 7 ࣭ண⟬㸦⿵ṇண⟬ࢆྵࡴ㸧࡞ࡘ࠸࡚ࠊ⌮࡛Ỵᐃࡍࡿ๓ࠊ࠶ࡽࡌࡵホ㆟ဨࡢ ពぢࢆ⪺࠸࡚࠸࡞࠸ࡓࡵ⚾❧Ꮫᰯἲ➨ 42 ᮲ゐࠋ ࣭Ỵ⟬ࡘ࠸࡚ࠊ⌮ࡢᢎㄆᚋホ㆟ဨሗ࿌ࡋࠊពぢࢆồࡵ࡚࠸࡞࠸ࡓࡵ⚾❧Ꮫᰯ ἲ➨ 46 ᮲ゐࠋ ࣭ㄆドホ౯ࢆཷࡅࡿࡲ࡛⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯ࡀᮍᐇࠋ ࣭⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯ࡢయไࡀᮍᩚഛࠋ ࣭⟶⌮㐠Ⴀ㛵ࢃࡿㅖつ⛬ࡀᮍᩚഛࠋ ᇶ‽ 8 ࣭㈈ົ≧ἣၥ㢟ࡀ࠶ࡿࠋ ࣭ᨭࡢࣂࣛࣥࢫࢆḞ࠸࡚࠸ࡿࠋ ࣭ண⟬ࡢ⦅ᡂ᪉ἲၥ㢟ࡀ࠶ࡿࠋ ᇶ‽ 9 ࣭ᰯ⯋࡞ࡢ⪏㟈⿵ᙉࡀᮍᩚഛࠋ ᇶ‽ 11 ࣭⤌⧊⌮㛵ࡍࡿㅖつ⛬ࡀᮍᩚഛࠋ ࠕཧ⪃ពぢࠖࡘ࠸࡚ ホ౯ᶵᵓ࡛ࡣࠕ࣭┠ⓗἢࡗࡓไᗘ࣭ࢩࢫࢸ࣒➼ࡣᩚഛࡉࢀ࡚࠸ࡿࡀࠊ࠶ࡲࡾᶵ⬟ 16 ࡋ࡚࠸࡞࠸ࠖ㡯ཬࡧࠕ㍍ᚤ࡞ၥ㢟Ⅼࠖࠕၥ㢟Ⅼ➼ࡸ࣭┠ⓗ➼ࢆ༑ศ㐩ᡂࡍࡿࡓࡵ ᚲせ⪃࠼ࡽࢀࡿពぢࠖࠕᨵၿࡀᮃࡲࡋ࠸ࡀࠊᏛุ᩿ࢆጤࡡࡿ㡯ࠖ࡞㛵ࡋ࡚ ࠕཧ⪃ពぢࠖࡋ࡚ᣦࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ ➨ 1 ࢧࢡ࡛ࣝࠕཧ⪃ពぢࠖࡢᣦࡀ᭱ࡶከࡗࡓᇶ‽ࡣࠕᇶ‽ 3㸬ᩍ⫱ㄢ⛬࡛ࠖࠊ135 ௳ࡢᣦࡀ࠶ࡗࡓࠋ⥆࠸࡚ࠕᇶ‽ 7㸬⟶⌮㐠Ⴀࠖࡀ 88 ௳ࠋࠕᇶ‽ 9㸬ᩍ⫱◊✲⎔ቃࠖࡢ 71 ௳⥆࠸ࡓࠋ1 Ꮫᙜࡓࡾࡢᣦᩘࡘ࠸࡚ࡣࠊᖺᗘࡼࡗ࡚ቑῶࡀ࠶ࡿࡶࡢࡢࠊ࡚ ࡢᏛࢆᖹᆒࡍࡿ 1 Ꮫᙜࡓࡾࡢࠕཧ⪃ពぢࠖࡣ 2.43 ௳ࡢᣦࡀ࠶ࡗࡓࠋ ࠕᇶ‽ 3㸬ᩍ⫱ㄢ⛬ࠖࡘ࠸࡚ࡣࠊࠕᨵၿࢆせࡍࡿⅬࠖࡶ㐃ືࡍࡿࡀࠊ1 ᖺ㛫ᒚಟ Ⓩ㘓ࡀ࡛ࡁࡿ༢ᩘࡢୖ㝈ࡘ࠸࡚ࡣࠊタᐃࡉࢀ࡚࠸ࡿࡶࡢࡢタᐃᩘࡀ㧗࠸ሙྜཬࡧタᐃ ࡉࢀ࡚࠸࡞࠸ࡀࠊᩍဨࡢᣦᑟࡸࡑࡢࡢᥐ⨨ࡼࡾᏛಟࡢ㉁ࡀᢸಖࡉࢀ࡚࠸ࡿุ᩿࡛ࡁ ࡓሙྜࠕཧ⪃ពぢࠖࡋ࡚ᣦࡋࡓࠋࡲࡓࠊᏛタ⨨ᇶ‽ࡢᨵṇ㸦Ꮫタ⨨ᇶ‽➼ࡢ୍ 㒊ࢆᨵṇࡍࡿ┬௧㸦ᖹᡂ 19 ᖺᩥ㒊⛉Ꮫ┬௧➨ 22 ྕ㸧㸧ࡢ㛵㐃࡛ࡣࠊᡂ⦼ホ౯ᇶ‽ࡀᏛ ๎࡞࡛つᐃࡉࢀ࡚࠸࡞࠸ሙྜࡸࢩࣛࣂࢫ࡞࠾࠸୍࡚㒊ࡢ⛉┠ࡢᤵᴗィ⏬ࡸᡂ⦼ホ౯ ᇶ‽ࡀ♧ࡉࢀ࡚࠸࡞࠸ሙྜࠕཧ⪃ពぢࠖࡋ࡚ᣦࡋࡓࠋ ࠕᇶ‽ 7㸬⟶⌮㐠Ⴀࠖࡘ࠸࡚ࡣࠊ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯άືࡘ࠸࡚ࠊ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯ሗ࿌ ᭩ࡀ࣮࣒࣮࣍࣌ࢪ࡛බ⾲ࡉࢀ࡚࠸࡞࠸ሙྜࠕཧ⪃ពぢࠖࡋ࡚ᣦࡋࡓࠋࡲࡓࠊࡑࡢయ ไࡸ⤖ᯝࡀᏛ㐠Ⴀࡢࡼ࠺ᫎࡉࢀ࡚࠸ࡿ࠸࠺Ⅼࡘ࠸࡚ࠊ≧ἣᛂࡌ࡚ࠕཧ ⪃ពぢࠖࡋ࡚ᣦࡋࡓࠋࡑࡢ࡛ࡣࠊࠕᨵၿࢆせࡍࡿⅬࠖࡶ㐃ືࡍࡿࡀࠊ⌮࣭ホ ㆟ဨࡘ࠸࡚ࠊ⌮ࠊホ㆟ဨཬࡧ┘ࡢᙺࡸฟᖍ≧ἣ࡞ࡘ࠸࡚ࠊ≧ἣᛂࡌ࡚ࠕཧ ⪃ពぢࠖࡋ࡚ᣦࡋࡓࠋ ࠕᇶ‽ 9㸬ᩍ⫱◊✲⎔ቃࠖࡘ࠸࡚ࡣࠊ71 ௳୰ 35 ௳ࡀタࡢࣂࣜࣇ࣮ࣜࡢᩚഛ≧ ἣࡘ࠸࡚ࠊ29 ௳ࡀᘓ≀ࡢ⪏㟈⿵ᙉࡢᩚഛ≧ἣ㛵ࡍࡿᣦ࡛࠶ࡗࡓࠋࡑࡢ࡛ࡣࠊタ タഛ㛵ࡍࡿ㛗ᮇᨵಟ࣭ಟ⧋ィ⏬ࡢ⟇ᐃ࡞ࡘ࠸࡚ࠕཧ⪃ពぢࠖࡋ࡚ᣦࡋࡓࠋ ᖺᗘูᇶ‽ู ཧ⪃ពぢࡢᣦᩘ 㻌 ᖺᗘ㻌 䠸㻌 ᇶ‽㻌 㻝㻌 㻞㻌 㻟㻌 㻠㻌 㻡㻌 㻢㻌 㻌 㻝㻣 ᖺᗘ㻌 㻞㻌 㻞㻌 㻞㻌 㻞㻌 㻟㻌 㻝㻌 㻟㻌 㻙㻌 㻝㻌 㻝㻌 㻝㻌 㻝㻤㻌 㻌 㻝㻤 ᖺᗘ㻌 㻠㻌 㻣㻌 㻡㻌 㻥㻌 㻤㻌 㻞㻌 㻡㻌 㻙㻌 㻝㻌 㻝㻌 㻞㻌 㻠㻠㻌 㻌 㻝㻥 ᖺᗘ㻌 㻡㻌 㻤㻌 㻝㻥㻌 㻝㻞㻌 㻞㻤㻌 㻤㻌 㻝㻠㻌 㻞㻌 㻞㻌 㻡㻌 㻞㻌 㻝㻜㻡㻌 㻌 㻞㻜 ᖺᗘ㻌 㻢㻌 㻤㻌 㻝㻤㻌 㻣㻌 㻡㻌 㻝㻜㻌 㻢㻌 㻝㻜㻌 㻥㻌 㻝㻌 㻣㻌 㻤㻣㻌 㻌 㻞㻝 ᖺᗘ㻌 㻞㻌 㻝㻥㻌 㻠㻟㻌 㻝㻜㻌 㻝㻥㻌 㻟㻌 㻞㻤㻌 㻝㻡㻌 㻞㻡㻌 㻙㻌 㻞㻟㻌 㻝㻤㻣㻌 㻌 㻞㻞 ᖺᗘ㻌 㻞㻌 㻝㻣㻌 㻠㻤㻌 㻞㻣㻌 㻡㻌 㻠㻌 㻟㻞㻌 㻝㻥㻌 㻟㻟㻌 㻙㻌 㻟㻟㻌 㻞㻞㻜㻌 㻌 ᇶ‽ูྜィ㻌 㻞㻝㻌 㻢㻝㻌 㻝㻟㻡㻌 㻢㻣㻌 㻢㻤㻌 㻞㻤㻌 㻤㻤㻌 㻠㻢㻌 㻣㻝㻌 㻢㻤㻌 㻢㻢㻝㻌 17 㻣㻌 㻤㻌 㻥㻌 㻝㻜㻌 㻤㻌 㻝㻝㻌 ᖺᗘูྜィ㻌 ᖺᗘูᇶ‽ู ཧ⪃ពぢࡢᖹᆒᣦᩘ 㻌 ᖺᗘ㻌 䠸㻌 ᇶ‽㻌 㻝㻌 㻞㻌 㻟㻌 㻠㻌 㻡㻌 㻢㻌 㻣㻌 㻤㻌 㻥㻌 㻝㻜㻌 㻝㻝㻌 ᖺᗘูᖹᆒ㻌 㻌 㻝㻣 ᖺᗘ㻌 㻜㻚㻡㻜㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻡㻜㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻡㻜㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻡㻜㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻣㻡㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻞㻡㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻣㻡㻌 㻌 㻙㻌 㻜㻚㻞㻡㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻞㻡㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻞㻡㻌 㻠㻚㻡㻜㻌 㻌 㻌 㻝㻤 ᖺᗘ㻌 㻜㻚㻞㻡㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻠㻠㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻟㻝㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻡㻢㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻡㻜㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻝㻟㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻟㻝㻌 㻌 㻙㻌 㻜㻚㻜㻢㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻜㻢㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻝㻟㻌 㻞㻚㻣㻡㻌 㻌 㻌 㻝㻥 ᖺᗘ㻌 㻜㻚㻝㻟㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻞㻝㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻡㻜㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻟㻞㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻣㻠㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻞㻝㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻟㻣㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻜㻡㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻜㻡㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻝㻟㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻜㻡㻌 㻞㻚㻣㻢㻌 㻌 㻌 㻞㻜 ᖺᗘ㻌 㻜㻚㻝㻜㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻝㻠㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻟㻝㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻝㻞㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻜㻥㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻝㻣㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻝㻜㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻝㻣㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻝㻢㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻜㻞㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻝㻞㻌 㻝㻚㻡㻜㻌 㻌 㻌 㻞㻝 ᖺᗘ㻌 㻜㻚㻜㻟㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻞㻣㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻢㻝㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻝㻠㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻞㻣㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻜㻠㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻟㻥㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻞㻝㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻟㻡㻌 㻌 㻙㻌 㻜㻚㻟㻞㻌 㻞㻚㻢㻟㻌 㻌 㻌 㻞㻞 ᖺᗘ㻌 㻜㻚㻜㻞㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻞㻜㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻡㻢㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻟㻞㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻜㻢㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻜㻡㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻟㻤㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻞㻞㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻟㻥㻌 㻌 㻙㻌 㻜㻚㻟㻥㻌 㻞㻚㻡㻥㻌 㻌 㻌 ᇶ‽ูᖹᆒ㻌 㻜㻚㻜㻤㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻞㻞㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻡㻜㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻞㻡㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻞㻡㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻝㻜㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻟㻞㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻝㻣㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻞㻢㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻜㻟㻌 㻌 㻜㻚㻞㻡㻌 㻞㻚㻠㻟㻌 㻌 ⥲ᣓ 6 ᖺ㛫ࡢ➨ 1 ࢧࢡࣝࢆࡾ㏉ࡗ࡚ࡳࡿࠊࠕᨵၿࢆせࡍࡿⅬࠖࡢᖹᆒᣦᩘࡀ 1.43 ௳ ࡛࠶ࡗࡓࡢᑐࡋࠊࠕඃࢀࡓⅬࠖࡢᖹᆒᣦᩘࡀ 6.17 ௳࡛࠶ࡾࠕඃࢀࡓⅬࠖࢆከࡃᣦࡋ ࡓࡇࡀࢃࡿࠋ ࠕඃࢀࡓⅬࠖࡘ࠸࡚ࡣࠊࠕᨵၿࢆせࡍࡿⅬࠖࡸࠕཧ⪃ពぢࠖẚ࡚ࠊከࡃ࠶ࡗࡓࡀࠊ ᖹᡂ 17(2005)ᖺᗘࡽᖹᡂ 19(2007)ᖺᗘࡲ࡛ཷᑂࡋࡓᏛࡘ࠸࡚ࡣࠊᖹᆒࡋ࡚ 1 Ꮫᙜࡓࡾ 10 ௳ࢆ㉸࠼ࡓࠋࡇࢀࡣࠊホ౯ᶵᵓࡀࣆ࣭ࣞࣅ࣮ࣗࡢ⢭⚄ᇶ࡙࠸࡚ᥖࡆࡓ┠ ⓗࢆ㋃ࡲ࠼ࠊࢥ࣑ࣗࢽࢣ࣮ࢩࣙࣥࢆ㔜どࡋࠊྛᏛࡢಶᛶ࣭≉Ⰽ࣭≉ᛶࢆ㓄៖ࡋࠊᩍ⫱◊ ✲άື➼ࡢᨵ㠉࣭ᨵၿᙺ❧࡚ࡿࡇࢆᛕ㢌⨨࠸ࡓᐃᛶⓗ࡞ホ౯ࢆ⾜ࡗࡓ⤖ᯝ࡛࠶ࡿ ⪃࠼ࡿࠋ࡞࠾ࠊᖹᡂ 20(2008)ᖺᗘ௨㝆ཷᑂࡋࡓᏛࡽࠕඃࢀࡓⅬࠖࡀῶᑡࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࡀࠊ ࠕඃࢀࡓⅬࠖࡘ࠸࡚ࡣࠊᩥ㒊⛉Ꮫ┬ࡢ⟅⏦ࡸሗඹ᭷ࡼࡾࠊ㛫ࡢ⤒㐣ࡶᙜ↛ ࡢࡇࡳ࡞ࡉࢀࡿ㡯ࡶከࡃ࠶ࡾࠊྠࡌྲྀ⤌ࡳࢆࡋ࡚࠸࡚ࡶࠕඃࢀࡓⅬࠖࡋ࡚ྲྀୖࡆ ࡽࢀ࡞ࡗࡓሙྜࡀከࡃ࠶ࡗࡓࡓࡵ࡛࠶ࡿࠋ ࠕᨵၿࢆせࡍࡿⅬࠖࡘ࠸࡚ࡣࠊ272 Ꮫ࡚ࡀ⚾❧Ꮫ࡛࠶ࡗࡓ㸦ཷᑂᙜ㸧ࡇࡶ ࠶ࡾࠊ⚾❧Ꮫᰯἲᇶ࡙ࡃᣦࡀከࡃ࠶ࡗࡓࠋࡲࡓࠊᣦᩘࡘ࠸࡚ࡶཷᑂᏛࡢቑຍ కࡗ࡚ቑຍࡋ࡚࠸ࡗࡓࡀࠊࡇࢀࡣࠊ㐣ཤࡢᣦᇶ࡙ࡁࠊබᖹᛶࡢほⅬࡽᣦࢆࡋ ࡓ㡯ࡀከࡃ࠶ࡗࡓࡓࡵ࡛࠶ࡿࠋࡇࡢⅬࡘ࠸࡚ࡣࠊホ౯ᶵᵓࡀබ⾲ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿホ౯⤖ᯝ࡞ ࢆᗈࡃ࿘▱ࡍࡿࡇࡼࡾࠊὀព࣭ႏ㉳ࢆಁࡍࡇࡀ࡛ࡁࡓࡢ࡛ࡣ࡞࠸ᛮࢃࢀࠊホ ౯ᶵᵓࡋ࡚ࡶ࠸ࡀṧࡿ⤖ᯝ࡞ࡗࡓࠋ ࠕཧ⪃ពぢࠖࡀពᅗࡍࡿࡇࢁࡣࠊࠕᨵၿࢆせࡍࡿⅬࠖࡋ࡚ᣦࡍࡿ࡛ࡣ࡞࠸ࡀࠊ ᨵၿࡘ࠸࡚Ꮫෆ᳨࡛ウࡋ࡚ࡋ࠸㡯ࡘ࠸࡚ᣦࡍࡿෆᐜ࡞ࡗ࡚࠸ࡿࠋホ౯ᶵᵓ࡛ ࡣࠊྠࡌ᪨ࡢᣦ࡛࠶ࡗ࡚ࡶࠕཧ⪃ពぢࠖࡶࡋࡃࡣࠕᨵၿࢆせࡍࡿⅬࠖࡋ࡚ᣦࡋ࡚ ࠸ࡿࠋࡇࢀࡣࠊ≧ἣᛂࡌ࡚ࡢุ᩿࡛࠶ࡾࠊࡲࡉࢥ࣑ࣗࢽࢣ࣮ࢩࣙࣥࢆ㔜どࡋࡓᐃᛶⓗ ࡞ホ౯ࢆ⾜ࡗࡓ⤖ᯝ࡛࠶ࡿࠋ ࠕඃࢀࡓⅬࠖࡘ࠸࡚ࡣࠊᚋࡶಶᛶ࣭≉Ⰽࢆ㋃ࡲ࠼ࡓྲྀ⤌ࡳࡋ࡚ྛᏛ࠾࠸࡚ ⥅⥆ࡋ࡚࠸ࡓࡔࡁࡓ࠸ࠋࡲࡓࠊࠕཧ⪃ពぢࠖࡘ࠸࡚ࡣᨵၿࡢᚲせᛶࡘ࠸࡚Ꮫෆ᳨࡛ウ ࡋ࡚࠸ࡓࡔࡁࠊ≧ἣᛂࡌࡓᑐᛂࢆ࠾㢪࠸ࡋࡓ࠸ࠋ᭱ᚋࠕᨵၿࢆせࡍࡿⅬࠖࡘ࠸࡚ࡣࠊ ᪩ᛴᨵၿྥࡅ࡚ྲྀ⤌ࢇ࡛࠸ࡓࡔࡁࡓ࠸ࠋ 18 ϩ ࣥࢣ࣮ࢺㄪᰝ㞟ィ⤖ᯝ ➨ ࢧࢡࣝࡢㄆドホ౯ཷᑂᏛࡢㄆドホ౯ᢸᙜ⪅ᑐࡋࠊྛᏛࡢㄆドホ౯ཷᑂᚋࡢ ≧ἣࡸ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯ᐇయไ࡞ࡘ࠸࡚グྡ㑅ᢥᘧᅇ⟅ཬࡧ⮬⏤グ㏙ࡽ࡞ࡿࣥࢣ ࣮ࢺㄪᰝࢆ࣓࣮ࣝ㓄ಙ࡚ᐇࡋࡓࠋ ࡑࡢ⤖ᯝࠊཷᑂᏛ ᰯࡢ࠺ࡕࠊ ᰯࡽᅇ⟅ࡀ࠶ࡗࡓࠋ ཷᑂᏛࡢᇶᮏሗࡘ࠸࡚ タၥᏛྡ ┬␎ タၥᏛࡢタ⨨ᖺᗘ ᭱ࡶከࡗࡓࡢࡀࠊタ⨨ࡽ ᖺࡽ ᖺ௨ෆࡢᏛ࡛ ᰯ࡛࠶ࡗࡓࠋḟࠊ ᖺࡽ ᖺ௨ෆࡢᏛࡀ ᰯࠊ ᖺࡽ ᖺ௨ෆࡢᏛࡀ ᰯ ⥆࠸ࡓࠋ ϱϭ䠉 ϭϮ͘ϴй タ⨨ࡽࡢᖺᩘ 㻝 ᖺ䛛䜙 㻝㻜 ᖺ䠄㻞㻜㻜㻞 ᖺタ⨨䡚䠅㻌 㻟㻤㻌 㻝㻠㻚㻣㻑㻌 㻝㻝 ᖺ䛛䜙 㻞㻜 ᖺ䠄㻝㻥㻥㻞 ᖺタ⨨䡚䠅㻌 㻣㻤㻌 㻟㻜㻚㻞㻑㻌 㻞㻝 ᖺ䛛䜙 㻟㻜 ᖺ䠄㻝㻥㻤㻞 ᖺタ⨨䡚䠅㻌 㻞㻥㻌 㻝㻝㻚㻞㻑㻌 㻟㻝 ᖺ䛛䜙 㻠㻜 ᖺ䠄㻝㻥㻣㻞 ᖺタ⨨䡚䠅㻌 㻞㻜㻌 㻣㻚㻤㻑㻌 㻠㻝 ᖺ䛛䜙 㻡㻜 ᖺ䠄㻝㻥㻢㻞 ᖺタ⨨䡚䠅㻌 㻢㻜㻌 㻞㻟㻚㻟㻑㻌 㻡㻝 ᖺ௨ୖ䠄䡚㻝㻥㻢㻝 ᖺタ⨨䠅㻌 㻟㻟㻌 㻝㻞㻚㻤㻑㻌 21 ϭ䠉ϭϬ ϭϰ͘ϳй ϰϭ䠉ϱϬ Ϯϯ͘ϯй ϭϭ䠉ϮϬ ϯϬ͘Ϯй ϯϭ䠉ϰϬ ϳ͘ϴй Ϯϭ䠉ϯϬ ϭϭ͘Ϯй タၥᡤᅾᆅ㸦㒔㐨ᗓ┴㸧㸦ᮏ㒊ᡤᅾᆅ㸧 ᭱ࡶከࡗࡓࡢࡀࠊᮾி㒔࡛ 37 ᰯ(14.3%)࡛࠶ࡗࡓࠋ⥆࠸࡚ࠊ㜰ᗓࡀ 26 ᰯ(10.1%)ࠊ ឡ▱┴ࡀ 22 ᰯ(8.5%)ࠊᾏ㐨ࡀ 14 ᰯ(5.4%)ࠊᇸ⋢┴ࡀ 12 ᰯ(4.7%)ࠊරᗜ┴ࡀ 11 ᰯ(4.3%) ࡞ࡾࠊ10 Ꮫ௨ୖ࠶ࡿࡢࡣ 6 㒔㐨ᗓ┴࡛࠶ࡗࡓࠋ ϰϬ ϯϱ ϯϬ Ϯϱ ϮϬ ϭϱ ϭϬ ϱ Ϭ ⚄ 㟷 ᒾ ᐑ ⛅ ᒣ ⚟ Ⲉ ᰣ ⩌ ᇸ ༓ ᮾ ᪂ ᐩ ▼ ⚟ ᒣ 㛗 ᒱ 㟼 ឡ ୕ ዉ ᾏ ᳃ ᡭ ᇛ ⏣ ᙧ ᓥ ᇛ ᮌ 㤿 ⋢ ⴥ ி ₲ ᒣ ᕝ 㔝 㜧 ᒸ ▱ 㔜 ᕝ 㐨 ┴ ┴ ┴ ┴ ┴ ┴ ┴ ┴ ┴ ┴ ┴ 㒔 ┴ ┴ ┴ ┴ ┴ ┴ ┴ ┴ ┴ ┴ ┴ Ꮫᩘ ϭϰ ϱ Ϯ ϱ ϭ Ϯ ϯ ϭ ϯ ϯ ϭϮ ϵ ϯϳ ϱ ϰ ϯ ϱ Ϯ Ϯ ϰ ϱ ϳ ϮϮ ϯ ϯϬ Ϯϱ ϮϬ ϭϱ ϭϬ ϱ Ϭ 㮵 ி ර ዉ 㫽 ᓥ ᒸ ᗈ ᒣ ᚨ 㤶 ឡ 㧗 ⚟ బ 㛗 ⇃ ᐑ Ἀ ඣ ḷ ㈡ 㒔 㜰 ᗜ Ⰻ ྲྀ ᰿ ᒣ ᓥ ཱྀ ᓥ ᕝ ▱ ᒸ ㈡ ᓮ ᮏ ศ ᓮ ⦖ ᓥ ᒣ ┴ ᗓ ᗓ ┴ ┴ ┴ ┴ ┴ ┴ ┴ ┴ ┴ ┴ ┴ ┴ ┴ ┴ ┴ ┴ ┴ ┴ ┴ ┴ Ꮫᩘ Ϯ ϱ Ϯϲ ϭϭ ϯ Ϭ ϭ Ϭ ϲ ϵ ϲ ϭ Ϯ ϭ Ϭ ϳ Ϭ Ϯ ϲ Ϯ ϯ ϰ Ϯ タၥタ⨨Ꮫ㒊ࡢ✀㢮ࡘ࠸࡚ タ⨨Ꮫ㒊ࡢ✀㢮ࡘ࠸࡚ࡣࠊᏛタ⨨ᇶ‽ࡢู⾲➨୍ࡢᏛ㒊ࡢ✀㢮ᇶ࡙࠸࡚ࠊタ⨨Ꮫ 㒊࡚ࡘ࠸࡚グධࢆồࡵࡓࠋ ᭱ࡶከࡗࡓࡢࡀ⤒῭Ꮫ㛵ಀ࡛ࠊᅇ⟅ࡋࡓ 258 Ꮫࡢ࠺ࡕ 96 ᰯ(37.2%)࡛࠶ࡗࡓࠋ2 ␒ ┠ከࡗࡓ♫Ꮫ࣭♫⚟♴㛵ಀᏛ㛵ಀࡀ 84 ᰯ(32.6%)ࠊ3 ␒┠ࡣᩥᏛ㛵ಀ࡛ 79 ᰯ (30.6%)ࠊ4 ␒┠ࡣᩍ⫱Ꮫ࣭ಖ⫱Ꮫ㛵ಀ࡛ 65 ᰯ(25.2%)࡛࠶ࡗࡓࠋ タ⨨Ꮫ㒊ࡢ✀㢮㛵ࡋ࡚ࡣࠊᖹᡂ 17(2005)ᖺᗘࡽᖹᡂ 20(2008)ᖺᗘࡲ࡛ࡢཷᑂᏛ 㸦௨ୗࠊ๓༙ࡢᏛ㸧ᖹᡂ 21(2009)ᖺᗘཬࡧᖹᡂ 22(2010)ᖺᗘཷᑂࡋࡓᏛ㸦௨ୗࠊ ᚋ༙ࡢᏛ㸧ศࡅ࡚㞟ィࢆࡋࡓࠋ ྛᏛ㒊ࡢ✀㢮࠾ࡅࡿయᩘࢆ 100%ࡋࡓᚋ༙ࡢᏛࡢྜࡀ᭱ࡶ㧗ࡗࡓࡢࡣ ἲᏛ㛵ಀ࡛ 72.7%ࠊ2 ␒┠㧗ࡗࡓࡢࡀᐙᨻ㛵ಀ࡛ 69.6%ࠊ3 ␒┠㧗ࡗࡓࡢࡀ♫ Ꮫ࣭♫⚟♴Ꮫ㛵ಀ࡛ 69.1%⥆࠸ࡓࠋᚋ༙ࡢᏛࡢᐙᨻ㛵ಀࡣᰤ㣴Ꮫ⣔ࡢᏛ࡛࠶ ࡗࡓࠋ 22 㻝㻣㻙㻞㻜 ᖺᗘ㻌 㻌 㻞㻝㻘㻞㻞 ᖺᗘ㻌 㸦17-20 ᖺᗘ㸸 ྜィ㻌 㻌 䐟ᩥᏛ㛵ಀ㻌 㻟㻝㻌 㻠㻤㻌 㻣㻥㻌 ᖹᡂ 17(2005)ᖺᗘ 㻌 䐠ᩍ⫱Ꮫ䞉ಖ⫱Ꮫ㛵ಀ㻌 㻞㻣㻌 㻟㻤㻌 㻢㻡㻌 ࡽᖹᡂ 20(2008)ᖺᗘ 㻌 䐡ἲᏛ㛵ಀ㻌 㻥㻌 㻞㻠㻌 㻟㻟㻌 ࡲ࡛ࡢཷᑂᏛ㸧 㻌 䐢⤒῭Ꮫ㛵ಀ㻌 㻟㻠㻌 㻢㻞㻌 㻥㻢㻌 㸦21,22 ᖺᗘ㸸 㻌 䐣♫Ꮫ䞉♫⚟♴Ꮫ㛵ಀ㻌 㻞㻢㻌 㻡㻤㻌 㻤㻠㻌 ᖹᡂ 21(2009)ᖺᗘཬ 㻌 䐤⌮Ꮫ㛵ಀ㻌 㻣㻌 㻟㻌 㻝㻜㻌 㻌 䐥ᕤᏛ㛵ಀ㻌 㻞㻝㻌 㻞㻠㻌 㻠㻡㻌 㻌 䐦㎰Ꮫ㛵ಀ㻌 㻠㻌 㻝㻌 㻡㻌 㻌 䐧⋇་Ꮫ㛵ಀ㻌 㻝㻌 㻝㻌 㻞㻌 㻌 䐨⸆Ꮫ㛵ಀ㻌 㻥㻌 㻢㻌 㻝㻡㻌 㻌 䐩ᐙᨻ㛵ಀ㻌 㻝㻠㻌 㻟㻞㻌 㻠㻢㻌 㻌 䐪⨾⾡㛵ಀ㻌 㻣㻌 㻝㻡㻌 㻞㻞㻌 㻌 䐫㡢ᴦ㛵ಀ㻌 㻢㻌 㻥㻌 㻝㻡㻌 㻌 䐬య⫱㛵ಀ㻌 㻤㻌 㻝㻠㻌 㻞㻞㻌 㻌 䐭ಖ⾨⏕Ꮫ䠄┳ㆤᏛ䠅㛵ಀ㻌 㻝㻡㻌 㻝㻤㻌 㻟㻟㻌 㻌 䐮ಖ⾨⏕Ꮫ䠄┳ㆤᏛ㝖䛟䠅㛵ಀ㻌 㻝㻢㻌 㻞㻞㻌 㻟㻤㻌 㻌 䐯་Ꮫ㛵ಀ㻌 㻠㻌 㻝㻌 㻡㻌 㻌 䐰ṑᏛ㛵ಀ㻌 㻠㻌 㻜㻌 㻠㻌 㻌 䐱䛭䛾㻌 㻝㻞㻌 㻢㻌 㻝㻤㻌 㻌 䐲↓グධ㻌 㻡㻌 㻠㻌 㻥㻌 䐟ᩥᏛ㛵ಀ ϯϭ 䐠ᩍ⫱Ꮫ䞉ಖ⫱Ꮫ㛵ಀ Ϯϰ 䐢⤒῭Ꮫ㛵ಀ ϯϰ ϲϮ Ϯϲ ϱϴ 䐤⌮Ꮫ㛵ಀ ϳ 䐥ᕤᏛ㛵ಀ ϯ Ϯϭ Ϯϰ 䐦㎰Ꮫ㛵ಀ ϰ 䐧⋇་Ꮫ㛵ಀ ϭ ϭ ϭ 䐨⸆Ꮫ㛵ಀ ϵ ϲ 䐩ᐙᨻ㛵ಀ ϭϰ ϯϮ 䐪⨾⾡㛵ಀ ϳ ϭϱ 䐫㡢ᴦ㛵ಀ ϲ 䐬య⫱㛵ಀ ϵ ϴ 䐭ಖ⾨⏕Ꮫ䠄┳ㆤᏛ䠅㛵ಀ ϭϰ ϭϱ 䐮ಖ⾨⏕Ꮫ䠄┳ㆤᏛ㝖䛟䠅㛵ಀ ϭϴ ϭϲ ϮϮ 䐯་Ꮫ㛵ಀ ϰ 䐰ṑᏛ㛵ಀ ϭϳͲϮϬᖺᗘ 䐱䛭䛾 Ϯϭ͕ϮϮᖺᗘ 䐲↓グධ ϯϴ ϵ 䐣♫Ꮫ䞉♫⚟♴Ꮫ㛵ಀ ࡢཷᑂᏛ㸧 ϰϴ Ϯϳ 䐡ἲᏛ㛵ಀ ࡧᖹᡂ 22(2010)ᖺᗘ ϭ ϰ ϭϮ ϲ ϱ Ϭй ϰ ϮϬй ϰϬй 23 ϲϬй ϴϬй ϭϬϬй タၥᖹᡂ ᖺ ᭶ ᪥Ⅼࡢタ⨨Ꮫ㒊ᩘཬࡧ◊✲⛉ᩘ㸦ເ㞟ṆࡢᏛ㒊࣭◊✲⛉ࡣྵ ࡲ࡞࠸㸧ࡘ࠸࡚ タ⨨Ꮫ㒊ࡘ࠸࡚ࠊ ᭱ࡶከࡗࡓࡢࡀ 1 Ꮫ㒊ࡢࡳタ⨨ࡢᏛ࡛ 100 ᰯ(38.8%)࡛࠶ࡗࡓࠋ ḟ 2 Ꮫ㒊タ⨨ࡢᏛࡀ 79 ᰯ(30.6%)ࠊ3 Ꮫ㒊タ⨨ࡢᏛࡀ 42 ᰯ(16.3%)⥆࠸ࡓࠋᏛ㒊 ᩘࡀቑ࠼ࡿᚑ࠸Ꮫᩘࡣῶᑡࡋࡓࠋ タ⨨◊✲⛉ᩘࡘ࠸࡚ࡶ᭱ࡶከࡗࡓࡢࡀ 1 ◊✲⛉ࡢࡳࢆタ⨨ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿᏛ㝔࡛ 125 ᰯ ࡛࠶ࡾࠊ ᅇᅇ⟅ࡋࡓᏛࡢ࠺ࡕࠊ Ꮫ㝔ࢆタ⨨ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿᏛ 186 ᰯᑐࡍࡿྜࡣ 67.2% ࡛࠶ࡗࡓࠋḟ 2 ◊✲⛉タ⨨ࡢᏛ㝔ࡀ 35 ᰯ࡛ 186 ᰯᑐࡋ࡚ 18.8%ࠊ3 ◊✲⛉タ⨨ࡢ Ꮫ㝔ࡣ 12 ᰯ(6.5)%࡛࠶ࡗࡓࠋ タ⨨Ꮫ㒊ᩘ タ⨨◊✲⛉ᩘ ϭᏛ㒊 ϭ◊✲⛉ ϭϬϬ ϮᏛ㒊 ϯᏛ㒊 ϭϴ ϱᏛ㒊 ϴ ϲᏛ㒊 ϭϮ ϰ◊✲⛉ ϰ ϱ◊✲⛉ ϯ ϲ◊✲⛉ ϯ ϳᏛ㒊 ϯϱ ϯ◊✲⛉ ϰϮ ϰᏛ㒊 ϭϮϱ Ϯ◊✲⛉ ϳϵ ϯ ϰ ϳ◊✲⛉ ϭ ϴ◊✲⛉ Ϭ ϴᏛ㒊 ϭ ϵ◊✲⛉ Ϭ ϵᏛ㒊 ϭ ϭϬ◊✲⛉ Ϯ タၥᐜᐃဨᅾ⡠Ꮫ⏕ᩘࡘ࠸࡚ Ꮫ㒊㸦Ꮫ㸧 ࡢᐜᐃဨࡘ࠸࡚ࡣࠊ 501 ே㹼1,000 ேつᶍࡢᏛࡀ᭱ࡶከࡃ 67 ᰯ(26.3%) ࡛࠶ࡗࡓࠋḟ 1,001 ே㹼1,500 ேつᶍࡢᏛࡀ 53 ᰯ(22.7%)ࠊ1,501 ே㹼2,000 ேつᶍࡢ Ꮫࡀ 41 ᰯ(16.1%)࡛࠶ࡾࠊ᭱ࡶᑡ࡞ࡗࡓࡢࡣᐜᐃဨࡀ 500 ே௨ୗࡢᏛ࡛ 16 ᰯ (6.3%)࡛࠶ࡗࡓࠋ ᐜᐃဨᑐࡍࡿ㊊⋡ࡣࠊ70%㹼99%ࡀ᭱ࡶከࡃ 124 ᰯ(48.6%)࡛ࠊ100%㹼129%ࡀ 79 ᰯ(31.0%)ࠊ50%㹼69%ࡀ 43 ᰯ(16.9%)࡛࠶ࡗࡓࠋ ᏛࡢつᶍᑐࡍࡿᏛ㒊ࡢᐃဨ㊊≧ἣࡘ࠸࡚ࡣࠊᐜᐃဨ 2,001 ே௨ୖࡢᏛ 78 ᰯࡢ࠺ࡕ 46 ᰯ(59.0%)ࡢ㊊⋡ࡀ 100%௨ୖ࡛࠶ࡗࡓࡢᑐࡋ࡚ࠊᐜᐃဨ 2,000 ே௨ୗ ࡢᏛ 177 ᰯࡢ࠺ࡕ 100%௨ୖ࡛࠶ࡗࡓࡢࡣ 36 ᰯ(20.3%)࡛࠶ࡗࡓࠋ ◊✲⛉㸦Ꮫ㝔㸧ࡢᐜᐃဨࡘ࠸࡚ࡣࠊ41 ே㹼100 ேつᶍࡢᏛ㝔ࡀ᭱ࡶከࡃ 57 ᰯ (30.6%)࡛࠶ࡗࡓࠋḟ 20 ே௨ୗࡢᏛ㝔ࡀ 44 ᰯ(23.7%)ࠊ21 ே㹼40 ேつᶍࡢᏛ㝔ࡀ 42 ᰯ(22.6%)࡛࠶ࡗࡓࠋ ᐜᐃဨᑐࡍࡿ㊊⋡ࡣࠊ70%㹼99%ࡀ᭱ࡶከࡃ 53 ᰯ(28.5%)࡛ࠊ50%㹼69%ࡀ 40 ᰯ(21.5%)ࠊ100%㹼129%ࡀ 38 ᰯ(20.4%)࡛࠶ࡗࡓࠋ Ꮫ㝔ࡢつᶍᑐࡍࡿ◊✲⛉ࡢᐃဨ㊊≧ἣࡘ࠸࡚ࡣࠊᐜᐃဨࡼࡿഴྥࡣ࡞࠸ࡀࠊ Ꮫ㒊ẚ㍑ࡋࠊᐜᐃဨᑐࡍࡿ㊊⋡ࡀ 50%ᮍ‶ࡢᏛ㝔ࡀከࡃ࡞ࡗ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ 24 㸺Ꮫ㒊㸦Ꮫ㸧ࡢᐜᐃဨ㸼 㸺Ꮫ㒊㸦Ꮫ㸧ࡢᅾ⡠Ꮫ⏕ᩘ㸼 ϱ͕ϬϬϭ௨ୖ ϭϵ ϯ͕ϬϬϭ䠉ϱ͕ϬϬϬ Ϯϳ Ϯ͕ϬϬϭ䠉ϯ͕ϬϬϬ ϮϮ ϯϮ Ϯϰ ϭ͕ϬϬϭ䠉ϭ͕ϱϬϬ ϱϯ ϱϬϭ䠉ϭ͕ϬϬϬ ϭ䠉ϱϬϬ ϯ͕ϬϬϭ䠉ϱ͕ϬϬϬ ϭ͕ϱϬϭ䠉Ϯ͕ϬϬϬ ϰϭ ϭ͕ϬϬϭ䠉ϭ͕ϱϬϬ ϮϮ Ϯ͕ϬϬϭ䠉ϯ͕ϬϬϬ ϯϮ ϭ͕ϱϬϭ䠉Ϯ͕ϬϬϬ ϱ͕ϬϬϭ௨ୖ ϰϲ ϱϬϭ䠉ϭ͕ϬϬϬ ϲϳ ϭ䠉ϱϬϬ ϭϲ ϳϰ ϯϱ 㸺Ꮫ㒊㸦Ꮫ㸧ࡢᐜᐃဨ㊊⋡㸼 㻌 㻝㻟㻜㻑௨ୖ㻌 㻟㻌 㻝㻚㻞㻑㻌 㻌 㻝㻜㻜䠉㻝㻞㻥㻑㻌 㻣㻥㻌 㻟㻝㻚㻜㻑㻌 㻌 㻣㻜䠉㻥㻥㻑㻌 㻝㻞㻠㻌 㻠㻤㻚㻢㻑㻌 㻌 㻡㻜䠉㻢㻥㻑㻌 㻠㻟㻌 㻝㻢㻚㻥㻑㻌 㻌 㻠㻥㻑௨ୗ㻌 㻢㻌 㻞㻚㻠㻑㻌 ϰϵй௨ୗ Ϯ͘ϰй ϱϬ㸫ϲϵй ϭϲ͘ϵй ϳϬ㸫ϭϬϬй ϰϴ͘ϲй 㸺Ꮫ㒊㸦Ꮫ㸧ࡢつᶍู㊊⋡㸼 Ꮫ㒊䛾ᐜᐃဨ䛜Ϯ͕ϬϬϬே௨ୗ ϰϬ ϯϬ ϮϬ ϭϬ Ϭ ϰϵй௨ୗ ϱϬ㸫ϲϵй ϭ䠉ϱϬϬ ϭ ϱ ϵ ϭ Ϭ ϱϬϭ䠉ϭ͕ϬϬϬ ϭ ϭϴ ϰϬ ϳ ϭ ϭ͕ϬϬϭ䠉ϭ͕ϱϬϬ Ϭ ϭϬ ϯϭ ϭϮ Ϭ ϭ͕ϱϬϭ䠉Ϯ͕ϬϬϬ ϯ ϯ ϮϬ ϭϰ ϭ ϳϬ㸫ϵϵй ϭϬϬ㸫ϭϮϵй ϭϯϬй௨ୖ Ꮫ㒊䛾ᐜᐃဨ䛜Ϯ͕ϬϬϭே௨ୖ ϮϬ ϭϬ Ϭ ϰϵй௨ୗ ϱϬ㸫ϲϵй Ϯ͕ϬϬϭ䠉ϯ͕ϬϬϬ Ϭ ϰ ϳϬ㸫ϵϵй ϭϬϬ㸫ϭϮϵй ϭϯϬй௨ୖ ϭϮ ϭϲ Ϭ ϯ͕ϬϬϭ䠉ϱ͕ϬϬϬ ϭ ϯ ϵ ϭϯ ϭ ϱ͕ϬϬϭ௨ୖ Ϭ Ϭ ϯ ϭϲ Ϭ 25 ϭϯϬй௨ୖ ϭ͘Ϯй ϭϬϬ㸫 ϭϮϵй ϯϭ͘Ϭй 㸺◊✲⛉㸦Ꮫ㝔㸧ࡢᐜᐃဨ㸼 㸺◊✲⛉㸦Ꮫ㝔㸧ࡢᅾ⡠Ꮫ⏕ᩘ㸼 ϱϬϭ௨ୖ ϱϬϭ௨ୖ ϱ ϭϬϭ䠉ϱϬϬ ϭϬϭ䠉ϱϬϬ ϯϴ ϰϭ䠉ϭϬϬ Ϯϭ䠉ϰϬ ϯϲ Ϯϭ䠉ϰϬ ϰϮ ϭ䠉ϮϬ ϰϭ ϰϭ䠉ϭϬϬ ϱϳ ϯ ϱϱ ϭ䠉ϮϬ ϰϰ ϱϬ 㸺◊✲⛉㸦Ꮫ㝔㸧ࡢᐜᐃဨ㊊⋡㸼 㻌 㻝㻟㻜㻑௨ୖ㻌 㻞㻟㻌 㻝㻞㻚㻠㻑㻌 㻌 㻝㻜㻜䠉㻝㻞㻥㻑㻌 㻟㻤㻌 㻞㻜㻚㻠㻑㻌 㻌 㻣㻜䠉㻥㻥㻑㻌 㻡㻟㻌 㻞㻤㻚㻡㻑㻌 㻌 㻡㻜䠉㻢㻥㻑㻌 㻠㻜㻌 㻞㻝㻚㻡㻑㻌 㻌 㻠㻥㻑௨ୗ㻌 㻟㻞㻌 㻝㻣㻚㻞㻑㻌 ϭ㸫ϰϵй ϭϳ͘Ϯй ϱϬ㸫ϲϵй Ϯϭ͘ϱй 㸺◊✲⛉㸦Ꮫ㝔㸧ࡢつᶍู㊊⋡㸼 ϮϬ ϭϬϬ㸫 ϭϮϵй ϮϬ͘ϰй ϳϬ㸫ϭϬϬй Ϯϴ͘ϱй ϭϯϬй௨ୖ ϭϮ͘ϰй ϭϬ Ϭ ϰϵй௨ୗ ϱϬ㸫ϲϵй ϳϬ㸫ϵϵй ϭϬϬ㸫ϭϮϵй ϭϯϬй௨ୖ ϴ ϭ䠉ϮϬ ϱ ϲ ϭϭ ϭϰ Ϯϭ䠉ϰϬ ϭϮ ϭϮ ϴ ϵ ϭ ϰϭ䠉ϭϬϬ ϴ ϭϯ ϭϵ ϴ ϵ ϭϬϭ䠉ϱϬϬ ϲ ϳ ϭϰ ϲ ϱ ϱϬϭ௨ୖ ϭ Ϯ ϭ ϭ Ϭ 26 タၥᡤᒓࡋ࡚࠸ࡿ⚾Ꮫ㛵ಀᅋయࡘ࠸࡚ ᡤᒓࡋ࡚࠸ࡿ⚾Ꮫ㛵ಀᅋయࡘ࠸࡚ࡣࠊホ౯ᶵᵓࡢタ❧ẕయ࡞ࡗࡓ᪥ᮏ⚾❧Ꮫ༠ ຍ┕ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿᏛࡀ 225 ᰯ࡛࠶ࡾయࡢ 87.2%ࢆ༨ࡵࡓࠋḟከࡗࡓࡢࡀ↓ᡤᒓࡢ Ꮫ࡛ 14 ᰯ(5.4%)ࠊ᪥ᮏ⚾❧Ꮫ㐃┕ࡀ 7 ᰯ(2.7%)ࠊ᪥ᮏ⚾❧Ꮫ⯆༠ࡀ 3 ᰯ(1.2%) ⥆࠸ࡓࠋ ➨ 1 ࢧࢡࣝࡢཷᑂᏛࡣ࡚⚾❧Ꮫ࡛࠶ࡗࡓ㸦ཷᑂᙜ㸧ࡇࠊタၥ(41)㹼(46) ࠾ࡅࡿホ౯ᶵ㛵ࢆỴᐃࡍࡿ㝿ࡢඃඛ㡯ࡢ㛵㐃ࢆ☜ㄆࡍࡿࡓࡵࡇࡢタၥࢆ⏝ពࡋࡓࠋ 㻌 䐟᪥ᮏ⚾❧Ꮫ༠㻌 㻞㻞㻡㻌 㻌 䐠♫ᅋἲே᪥ᮏ⚾❧Ꮫ㐃┕㻌 㻣㻌 㻤㻣㻚㻞㻑㻌 㻞㻚㻣㻑㻌 㻌 䐡᪥ᮏ⚾❧Ꮫ⯆༠㻌 㻟㻌 㻝㻚㻞㻑㻌 㻝㻠㻌 㻡㻚㻠㻑㻌 㻥㻌 㻟㻚㻡㻑㻌 䐢 䐣 㻌 䐢ᡤᒓ䛧䛶䛔䛺䛔㻌 㻌 䐣↓ᅇ⟅㻌 䐟 䐠 䐡 ϮϮϱ ϳ ϯ ϭϰ ϵ ๓ᅇࡢㄆドホ౯ཷᑂᚋࡘ࠸࡚ タၥㄆドホ౯ࡢཷᑂࡣࠊᏛࡢᨵ㠉ࡢᙺ❧ࡕࡲࡋࡓࠋ ㄆドホ౯ࡢཷᑂࡀᏛࡢᙺ❧ࡗࡓ࠺ࡘ࠸࡚ࡣࠊࠕ↓ᅇ⟅ࠖࡢᏛࡀ 6 ᰯ࠶ࡗ ࡓࡶࡢࡢࠊࠕ࠸࠸࠼ࠖᅇ⟅ࡋࡓᏛࡣ࡞ࡃࠊࠕࡣ࠸ࠖࡢᅇ⟅ࡀ 258 ᰯ୰ 252 ᰯ(97.7%) ࡛࠶ࡗࡓࠋ 䛿䛔㻌 㻞㻡㻞㻌 㻥㻣㻚㻣㻑㻌 䛔䛔䛘㻌 㻜㻌 㻜㻚㻜㻑㻌 ↓ᅇ⟅㻌 㻢㻌 㻞㻚㻟㻑㻌 タၥᣦ㡯➼ࢆࡢࡼ࠺Ꮫෆ࿘▱ࡋࡲࡋࡓࠋ ㄆドホ౯࡛ࡢᣦ㡯ࢆࡢࡼ࠺Ꮫෆ࿘▱ࡋࡓࡘ࠸࡚ࠊ᭱ࡶከࡗࡓࡢࡣࠕㄪ ᰝሗ࿌᭩ࢆᏛෆ㛵ಀ⪅㓄ᕸࡋࡓ࡛ࠖࠊ258 ᰯ୰ 211 ᰯ(81.8%)ࡀᅇ⟅ࡋࡓࠋḟከࡗ ࡓࡢࡣࠕㄪᰝሗ࿌᭩ࢆ࣮࣒࣮࣍࣌ࢪ࡛බ㛤ࡋࡓ࡛ࠖࠊ258 ᰯ୰ 159 ᰯ(61.6%)ࡀᅇ⟅ࡋࡓࠋ ⥆࠸࡚ࠊࠕᏛෆㄪᰝሗ࿌᭩ࡢ㜀ぴሙᡤࢆタࡅࡓࠋࠖࡀ 36 ᰯ(14.0%)ࠊࠕᗈሗㄅࡸ࣮࣒࣍ ࣮࣌ࢪ➼ᣦ㡯ࡢᴫせࢆᥖ㍕ࡋࡓࠋࠖࡀ 35 ᰯ(13.6%)ࡰྠᩘ࡛⥆࠸ࡓࠋ ࡇࡢタၥ࡛ࡣࠊᏛෆࡢ࿘▱᪉ἲ࠸࠺ࡇ࡛ࠊㄆドホ౯⤖ᯝࡋ࡚♫බ⾲ࡍࡿෆ ᐜ࡞ࡗ࡚࠸ࡿࠕホ౯ሗ࿌᭩࡛ࠖࡣ࡞ࡃࠊᏛࡢࡳ㏻▱ࡍࡿෆᐜࢆྵࡵࡓࠕㄪᰝሗ࿌᭩ࠖ ࢆ㑅ᢥ⫥ධࢀ࡚ㄪᰝࢆ⾜ࡗࡓࡀࠊࠕホ౯ሗ࿌᭩ࠖࠕㄪᰝሗ࿌᭩ࠖࡢ㐪࠸ࢆ⌮ゎࡋࡓୖ ࡛ᅇ⟅ࡋࡓᏛࡀᑡ࡞ࡗࡓぢࡽࢀࠊࠕㄪᰝሗ࿌᭩ࢆ࣮࣒࣮࣍࣌ࢪ࡛බ㛤ࡋࡓࠖᅇ⟅ ࡋࡓᏛࡢࢇࡀࠕホ౯ሗ࿌᭩ࠖࡢࡳࢆᥖ㍕ࡋ࡚࠸ࡓࠋࡇࢀ㛵ࡋ࡚ࡣࠊホ౯ᶵᵓࡢ ㄝ᫂㊊ࡶ࠶ࡾࠊ࠶ࡲࡾཧ⪃࡞ࡿ⤖ᯝࡣ࠸࠼࡞࠸ࠋ 27 ࡞࠾ࠊࠕࡑࡢࠖᅇ⟅ࡋࡓᏛࡢពぢࡣࠊࠕಖㆤ⪅⥲ࠊ㐍Ꮫㄝ᫂ࠊ࣮࢜ࣉࣥ ࢟ࣕࣥࣃࢫ࡛ሗ࿌ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠖࠕᏛෆࣥࢺࣛࢿࢵࢺ࡛ᩍ⫋ဨᑐࡋබ㛤࣭࿘▱ࡋࡓࠖ࡞ ࡢពぢࡀ࠶ࡗࡓࠋ 㻌 ᅇ⟅ᩘ㻌 ᅇ⟅ẚ㻌 㻌 䐟ㄪᰝሗ࿌᭩䜢䝩䞊䝮䝨䞊䝆䛷බ㛤䛧䛯㻌 㻝㻡㻥㻌 㻢㻝㻚㻢㻑㻌 㻌 䐠ㄪᰝሗ࿌᭩䜢Ꮫෆ㛵ಀ⪅䛻㓄ᕸ䛧䛯㻌 㻞㻝㻝㻌 㻤㻝㻚㻤㻑㻌 㻌 䐡Ꮫෆ䛻ㄪᰝሗ࿌᭩䛾㜀ぴሙᡤ䜢タ䛡䛯㻌 㻟㻢㻌 㻝㻠㻚㻜㻑㻌 㻌 䐢ᗈሗㄅ䜔䝩䞊䝮䝨䞊䝆➼䛻ᣦ㡯䛾ᴫせ䜢ᥖ㍕䛧䛯㻌 㻟㻡㻌 㻝㻟㻚㻢㻑㻌 㻜㻌 㻜㻚㻜㻑㻌 㻌 䐤䛭䛾㻌 㻞㻟㻌 㻤㻚㻥㻑㻌 㻌 䐥↓ᅇ⟅㻌 㻣㻌 㻞㻚㻣㻑㻌 㻌 䐣࿘▱䛧䛶䛔䛺䛔㻌 ϮϱϬ 㸦ᅇ⟅ẚ㸸 Ϯϭϭ ϮϬϬ ᅇ⟅Ꮫᩘ㸦258㸧ᑐࡍࡿᅇ⟅ࡢẚ⋡㸧 ϭϱϵ ϭϱϬ ϭϬϬ ϯϲ ϱϬ ϯϱ Ϯϯ ϳ Ϭ Ϭ 䐟 䐠 䐡 䐢 䐣 䐤 䐥 ࡞ពぢࡣ௨ୗࡢ㏻ࡾࠋ ࣭Ꮫ㛗࣭Ꮫ㛗ࡀฟᖍࡍࡿᏛ㒊㛗᠓ㄯ࡛ᗘࠎウ㆟ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋಖㆤ⪅⥲ࠊ㐍Ꮫㄝ᫂ࠊ ࣮࢜ࣉࣥ࢟ࣕࣥࣃࢫ࡛ሗ࿌ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ ࣭Ꮫෆࣥࢺࣛࢿࢵࢺ࡛ᩍ⫋ဨᑐࡋබ㛤࣭࿘▱ࡋࡓࠋ ࣭⮬ᕫホ౯ጤဨ࡛ᨵၿ㡯┠ࡢ☜ㄆࢆࡋࠊࡑࡢᨵၿ᳨ウྲྀ⤌ࡴࡇࡋࡓࠋ ࣭⮬ᕫⅬ᳨ホ౯ጤဨ࡛㓄ᕸࡋࠊㄪᰝሗ࿌᭩ᣦ㡯ཬࡧᮏᏛ࡛ࡢᣦ㡯ࡘ࠸࡚ࠊ⌧ ᅾࡲ࡛ࡢ㐍ᤖ≧ἣ୪ࡧᚋࡢணᐃࡘ࠸࡚ࠊሗ࿌᭩ࡢᥦฟࢆ౫㢗ࡋࡓࠋ ࣭⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯ጤဨᖿ࠾࠸࡚ࠊࠕせᥐ⨨㡯୍ぴࠖࡋ࡚ྲྀࡾࡲࡵࠊ㛵ಀ㒊 ⨫࿘▱ࡋࡓࠋ ࣭せ㆟㸦⌮ࠊᏛホ㆟ࠊᩍᤵ࡞㸧࡛ሗ࿌ࡋࠊඹ᭷ࡋࡓࠋ ࣭Ꮫෆ࣓࣮࡛ࣝᩍ⫋ဨㄪᰝሗ࿌᭩ࢆ࣮࣒࣮࣍࣌ࢪ࡛බ㛤ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࡇࢆ▱ࡽࡏࡓࠋ ࣭ㄪᰝሗ࿌᭩ࢆࢢ࣮ࣝࣉ࢙࢘ୖ࡛බ㛤ࡍࡿࡶࠊᏛ㐠Ⴀጤဨ࡛࿘▱ࡋࡓࠋ ࣭⮬ᕫⅬ᳨ホ౯ጤဨ࠾࠸࡚ࠊ᪂ጤဨࢆྵࡵ 2 ᖺ㛫ࡅ࡚Ꮫ⩦ࢆ⾜࠸ࠊጤဨࡽᏛෆ ⓗ☜࡞ෆᐜࡀ࿘▱ࡉࢀࡿࡼ࠺ࡋࡓࠋ ࣭ྛ㒊⨫ࡢ㛗࿘▱ࡋࡓࠋ ࣭ᣦ㡯ࢆヱᙜ⤌⧊㸦Ꮫ㒊ࠊົᒁࠊጤဨ࡞㸧࿘▱ࡋࠊࡑࡢᨵၿࡘ࠸᳨࡚ウࡋ ࡓࠋ 28 タၥㄆドホ౯࠾࠸࡚㈗Ꮫࡀసᡂࡋࡓ⮬ᕫホ౯ሗ࿌᭩ࡢࠕᨵၿ࣭ྥୖ᪉⟇ࠖᣲࡆ ࡓ㡯ࢆᨵၿࡋࡲࡋࡓࠋ ㄆドホ౯࠾࠸࡚ཷᑂᏛࡀ⮬ࡽࠕᨵၿ࣭ྥୖ᪉⟇ࠖࡋ࡚ᣲࡆࡓ㡯ࢆᨵၿࡋࡓ ࠺ࡘ࠸࡚ࠊࠕ࡚ᨵၿࡋࡓࠖᅇ⟅ࡋࡓᏛࡣ 22 ᰯ(8.5%)ࠊࠕ୍㒊ᨵၿࡋࡓࠖᅇ⟅ ࡋࡓᏛࡣ 225 ᰯ(87.2%)࡛࠶ࡾࠊࠕᨵၿࡋ࡚࠸࡞࠸ࠖᅇ⟅ࡋࡓᏛࡣ࡞ࡗࡓࠋ 㻌 䐟䛶ᨵၿ䛧䛯㻌 㻞㻞㻌 㻤㻚㻡㻑㻌 㻌 䐠୍㒊ᨵၿ䛧䛯㻌 㻞㻞㻡㻌 㻤㻣㻚㻞㻑㻌 㻜㻌 㻜㻚㻜㻑㻌 㻝㻝㻌 㻠㻚㻟㻑㻌 㻌 䐡ᨵၿ䛧䛶䛔䛺䛔㻌 㻌 䐢↓ᅇ⟅㻌 㸦ཷᑂᖺᗘูෆヂ㸧 㸦 㸧ෆࡣᅇ⟅Ꮫᩘ 㻌 䐟㻌 ᅇ⟅ẚ㻌 䐠㻌 ᅇ⟅ẚ㻌 䐡㻌 ᅇ⟅ẚ㻌 䐢㻌 ᅇ⟅ẚ㻌 㻌 㻝㻣 ᖺᗘ㻔㻠㻕㻌 㻝㻌 㻞㻡㻚㻜㻑㻌 㻞㻌 㻡㻜㻚㻜㻑㻌 㻜㻌 㻜㻚㻜㻑㻌 㻝㻌 㻞㻡㻚㻜㻑㻌 㻌 㻝㻤 ᖺᗘ㻔㻝㻡㻕㻌 㻜㻌 㻜㻚㻜㻑㻌 㻝㻟㻌 㻤㻢㻚㻣㻑㻌 㻜㻌 㻜㻚㻜㻑㻌 㻝㻌 㻢㻚㻣㻑㻌 㻌 㻝㻥 ᖺᗘ㻔㻟㻣㻕㻌 㻟㻌 㻤㻚㻝㻑㻌 㻞㻥㻌 㻣㻤㻚㻠㻑㻌 㻜㻌 㻜㻚㻜㻑㻌 㻡㻌 㻝㻟㻚㻡㻑㻌 㻌 㻞㻜 ᖺᗘ㻔㻡㻟㻕㻌 㻢㻌 㻝㻝㻚㻟㻑㻌 㻠㻠㻌 㻤㻟㻚㻜㻑㻌 㻜㻌 㻜㻚㻜㻑㻌 㻟㻌 㻡㻚㻣㻑㻌 㻌 㻞㻝 ᖺᗘ㻔㻢㻥㻕㻌 㻡㻌 㻣㻚㻞㻑㻌 㻢㻠㻌 㻥㻞㻚㻤㻑㻌 㻜㻌 㻜㻚㻜㻑㻌 㻜㻌 㻜㻚㻜㻑㻌 㻌 㻞㻞 ᖺᗘ㻔㻤㻜㻕㻌 㻢㻌 㻣㻚㻡㻑㻌 㻣㻟㻌 㻥㻝㻚㻟㻑㻌 㻜㻌 㻜㻚㻜㻑㻌 㻝㻌 㻝㻚㻟㻑㻌 ϭϳᖺᗘ ϭϮ ϭ 䐟䛶ᨵၿ䛧䛯 䐠୍㒊ᨵၿ䛧䛯 ϭϴᖺᗘ ϭϯ ϭ 䐡ᨵၿ䛧䛶䛔䛺䛔 䐢↓ᅇ⟅ ϭϵᖺᗘ ϯ ϮϬᖺᗘ ϲ Ϯϭᖺᗘ ϱ ϮϮᖺᗘ ϲ Ϭ Ϯϵ ϱ ϯ ϰϰ ϲϰ ϳϯ ϮϬ ϭ ϰϬ ϲϬ ϴϬ タၥㄆドホ౯࠾࠸࡚ᣦࡉࢀࡓᨵၿ㡯ࡘ࠸࡚ᨵၿࡋࡲࡋࡓࠋ ㄆドホ౯࠾࠸࡚ホ౯ᶵᵓࡽᣦࡉࢀࡓᨵၿ㡯ࡘ࠸࡚ࡢᨵၿ≧ἣࡘ࠸࡚ࠊࠕ ࡚ᨵၿࡋࡓࠖᅇ⟅ࡋࡓᏛࡣ 63 ᰯ(24.4%)ࠊࠕ୍㒊ᨵၿࡋࡓࠖᅇ⟅ࡋࡓᏛࡣ 170 ᰯ (65.9%)ࠊࠕᨵၿࡋ࡚࠸࡞࠸ࠖᅇ⟅ࡋࡓᏛࡣ 8 ᰯ(6.6%)࡛࠶ࡗࡓࠋ タၥ(11)ẚ㍑ࡋ࡚ࡳࡿࠊ⮬ࡽࠕᨵၿ࣭ྥୖ᪉⟇ࠖࡋ࡚ᣲࡆࡓ㡯ࡼࡾࡶ✚ᴟⓗ ᨵၿྲྀ⤌ࡲࢀ࡚࠸ࡿᵝᏊࡀ࠺ࡀ࠼ࡿࠋ࡞࠾ࠊࠕᨵၿࡋ࡚࠸࡞࠸ࠖᅇ⟅ࡋࡓ 8 Ꮫࡢ ࠺ࡕࠊ5 Ꮫࡘ࠸࡚ࡣᨵၿ㡯ࡢᣦࡀ࡞ࡗࡓᏛ࡛࠶ࡗࡓࠋ 29 㻌 䐟䛶ᨵၿ䛧䛯㻌 㻢㻟㻌 㻞㻠㻚㻠㻑㻌 㻌 䐠୍㒊ᨵၿ䛧䛯㻌 㻝㻣㻜㻌 㻢㻡㻚㻥㻑㻌 㻤㻌 㻟㻚㻝㻑㻌 㻝㻣㻌 㻢㻚㻢㻑㻌 㻌 䐡ᨵၿ䛧䛶䛔䛺䛔㻌 㻌 䐢↓ᅇ⟅㻌 㸦ཷᑂᖺᗘูෆヂ㸧 㸦 㸧ෆࡣᅇ⟅Ꮫᩘ 㻌 䐟㻌 ᅇ⟅ẚ㻌 䐠㻌 ᅇ⟅ẚ㻌 䐡㻌 ᅇ⟅ẚ㻌 䐢㻌 ᅇ⟅ẚ㻌 㻌 㻝㻣 ᖺᗘ㻔㻠㻕㻌 㻜㻌 㻜㻚㻜㻑㻌 㻞㻌 㻡㻜㻚㻜㻑㻌 㻝㻌 㻞㻡㻚㻜㻑㻌 㻝㻌 㻞㻡㻚㻜㻑㻌 㻌 㻝㻤 ᖺᗘ㻔㻝㻡㻕㻌 㻞㻌 㻝㻟㻚㻟㻑㻌 㻥㻌 㻢㻜㻚㻜㻑㻌 㻝㻌 㻢㻚㻣㻑㻌 㻟㻌 㻞㻜㻚㻜㻑㻌 㻌 㻝㻥 ᖺᗘ㻔㻟㻣㻕㻌 㻢㻌 㻝㻢㻚㻞㻑㻌 㻞㻡㻌 㻢㻣㻚㻢㻑㻌 㻞㻌 㻡㻚㻠㻑㻌 㻠㻌 㻝㻜㻚㻤㻑㻌 㻌 㻞㻜 ᖺᗘ㻔㻡㻟㻕㻌 㻞㻞㻌 㻠㻝㻚㻡㻑㻌 㻞㻡㻌 㻠㻣㻚㻞㻑㻌 㻝㻌 㻝㻚㻥㻑㻌 㻡㻌 㻥㻚㻠㻑㻌 㻌 㻞㻝 ᖺᗘ㻔㻢㻥㻕㻌 㻝㻥㻌 㻞㻣㻚㻡㻑㻌 㻠㻡㻌 㻢㻡㻚㻞㻑㻌 㻞㻌 㻞㻚㻥㻑㻌 㻟㻌 㻠㻚㻟㻑㻌 㻌 㻞㻞 ᖺᗘ㻔㻤㻜㻕㻌 㻝㻠㻌 㻝㻣㻚㻡㻑㻌 㻢㻠㻌 㻤㻜㻚㻜㻑㻌 㻝㻌 㻝㻚㻟㻑㻌 㻝㻌 㻝㻚㻟㻑㻌 ϭϳᖺᗘ 䐟䛶ᨵၿ䛧䛯 Ϯϭ ϭ 䐠୍㒊ᨵၿ䛧䛯 ϭϴᖺᗘ Ϯ ϵ 䐡ᨵၿ䛧䛶䛔䛺䛔 ϭ ϯ 䐢↓ᅇ⟅ ϭϵᖺᗘ ϲ Ϯϱ ϮϬᖺᗘ ϮϮ Ϯϭᖺᗘ ϰ ϭ Ϯϱ ϭϵ ϮϮᖺᗘ Ϯ Ϯ ϰϱ ϭϰ Ϭ ϱ ϭ ϭ ϲϰ ϮϬ ϯ ϰϬ ϲϬ ϴϬ タၥ๓ᅇࡢㄆドホ౯࠾ࡅࡿᨵၿ㡯ࡘ࠸࡚ࡢࡼ࠺ᨵၿྲྀ⤌ࡳࡲࡋࡓࠋ ๓ᅇࡢㄆドホ౯࠾ࡅࡿᨵၿ㡯ࡘ࠸࡚ࡢࡼ࠺ᨵၿྲྀ⤌ࢇࡔࡘ࠸࡚ࠊࠕᏛ 㛗ࡀ୰ᚰ࡞ࡗ࡚ᨵၿࡋࡓࠋࠖᅇ⟅ࡋࡓᏛࡀ 109 ᰯ(42.4%)ࠊࠕㄆドホ౯ࡢ⮬ᕫⅬ ᳨࣭ホ౯㛵ࢃࡿ⤌⧊ࡀ୰ᚰ࡞ࡗ࡚ᨵၿࡋࡓࠋࠖᅇ⟅ࡋࡓᏛࡀ 106 ᰯ(9.7%)ࠊࠕㄆ ドホ౯ࡢ⮬ᕫホ౯ᢸᙜ⪅(LO)ࡀ୰ᚰ࡞ࡗ࡚ᨵၿࡋࡓࠋ ࠖᅇ⟅ࡋࡓᏛࡀ 25 ᰯ(9.7%)ࠊ ࠕ᪂ࡓࠕᨵၿ᳨ウጤဨࠖࡢࡼ࠺࡞⤌⧊ࢆタ⨨ࡋ࡚ᨵၿࡋࡓࠋࠖᅇ⟅ࡋࡓᏛࡀ 8 ᰯ (3.1%)ࠊࠕࡑࡢࠖᅇ⟅ࡋࡓᏛࡀ 30 ᰯ(11.6%)࡛࠶ࡗࡓࠋ ࡇࡢタၥࡣ」ᩘ㑅ᢥ᪉ᘧ࡛࠶ࡗࡓࡀࠊࠕᏛ㛗⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯㛵ࢃࡿ⤌⧊ࡀ୰ᚰ࡞ ࡗ࡚ᨵၿࡋࡓࠖ࡞」ᩘࢆ㑅ᢥࡋࡓࡢࡣ 34 ᰯ(13.2%)࡛࠶ࡗࡓࠋ ࡞࠾ࠊࠕࡑࡢࠖᅇ⟅ࡋࡓᏛࡢពぢࡣࠊࠕᨵၿ㡯ࡢᢸᙜ㒊ᒁࡸࠊࡑࡢᵓᡂဨࡀ ᨵၿྲྀ⤌ࡳࠊ⮬ᕫホ౯ጤဨࡀᨵၿ≧ἣࢆ☜ㄆࡋࡓࠋࠖࠕᨵၿ㡯ࢆᏛෆ࿘▱ࡋࠊྛ 30 ࢢ࣮ࣝࣉ㛗ࡸ㛵ಀ⤌⧊ࢆ୰ᚰぢ┤ࡋࠊᨵၿྲྀ⤌ࢇࡔࠋࠖࠕෆᐜᛂࡌ࡚Ꮫ㛗ࠊ㛵㐃㒊 ᒁࠊᏛ㒊ࠊ◊✲⛉ࡢྲྀ⤌ࡳࡋ࡚ᨵၿࢆ㐍ࡵ࡚࠸ࡿࠋࠖ࡞ࡢពぢࡀ࠶ࡗࡓࠋ 㻌 ᅇ⟅ᩘ㻌 㻌 䐟Ꮫ㛗䛜୰ᚰ䛻䛺䛳䛶ᨵၿ䛧䛯䚹㻌 ᅇ⟅ẚ㻌 㻝㻜㻥㻌 㻠㻞㻚㻞㻑㻌 㻞㻡㻌 㻥㻚㻣㻑㻌 㻝㻜㻢㻌 㻠㻝㻚㻝㻑㻌 㻤㻌 㻟㻚㻝㻑㻌 㻌 䐣䛭䛾㻌 㻟㻜㻌 㻝㻝㻚㻢㻑㻌 㻌 䐤↓ᅇ⟅㻌 㻝㻝㻌 㻠㻚㻟㻑㻌 㻌 䐠ㄆドホ౯䛾⮬ᕫホ౯ᢸᙜ⪅㻔㻸㻻㻕䛜୰ᚰ䛻䛺䛳䛶ᨵၿ䛧䛯䚹㻌 㻌 䐡ㄆドホ౯䛾⮬ᕫⅬ᳨䞉ホ౯䛻㛵䜟䜛⤌⧊䛜୰ᚰ䛻䛺䛳䛶ᨵၿ䛧䛯䚹㻌 㻌 䐢᪂䛯䛻䛂ᨵၿ᳨ウጤဨ䛃䛾䜘䛖䛺⤌⧊䜢タ⨨䛧䛶ᨵၿ䛧䛯䚹㻌 ϭϮϬ ϭϬϵ ϭϬϲ ϭϬϬ ϴϬ ϲϬ ϰϬ ϯϬ Ϯϱ ϭϭ ϮϬ ϴ Ϭ 䐟 䐠 䐡 䐢 䐣 䐤 ࡞ពぢࡣ௨ୗࡢ㏻ࡾࠋ ࣭Ꮫ๎࡞ࡢグ㍕࡛࠶ࡗࡓࡓࡵࠊົⓗసᴗࢆ⾜ࡗࡓࠋ ࣭Ꮫࡢ୰ᮇィ⏬࡞࡛ᨵၿࢆᅗࡗ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ ࣭⌮ࡢࡶ⤒Ⴀᨵၿィ⏬㸦ᑗ᮶ᵓ㸧᳨ウጤဨࢆタࡅࠊᏛ⏕ເ㞟࣭ᗈሗࢆ୰ᚰ ୰ᮇィ⏬ࢆ⟇ᐃࡋࠊᐇࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ ࣭ᚑ๓ࡽᏛෆタ⨨ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠕ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨ጤဨࠖࡀ୰ᚰ࡞ࡗ࡚㸦ࢥࣥࢺ࣮ࣟࣝࢱ࣮࣡ ⓗᙺࢆᯝࡓࡋ࡞ࡀࡽ㸧ᨵၿྲྀ⤌ࢇ࡛࠸ࡿࠋ ࣭ᨵၿ㡯ࡢᢸᙜ㒊ᒁࡸࠊࡑࡢᵓᡂဨࡀᨵၿྲྀ⤌ࡳࠊ⮬ᕫホ౯ጤဨࡀᨵၿ≧ἣࢆ☜ㄆ ࡋࡓࠋ ࣭ᴗົᢸᙜ㒊⨫ࡀᨵၿ㡯ࡢෆᐜࢆ☜ㄆࡋࠊᢸᙜᴗົࡋ࡚ᨵၿࡋࡓࠋ ࣭Ꮫ⛉࣭ົㄢࡑࢀࡒࢀࡢᖺᗘᙜึࡢᴗ➼ᐇィ⏬ࡢ⟇ᐃࡢ㝿ᚲ㡲㡯ࡋ࡚ྵࡵࠊ ᖺᗘᮎࡢ⥲ᣓ࠾࠸࡚ࡣࡑࡢᐇ≧ἣࢆ☜ㄆࠊሗ࿌ࡋࡓࠋ ࣭ᨵၿ㡯ࢆᏛෆ࿘▱ࡋࠊྛࢢ࣮ࣝࣉ㛗ࡸ㛵ಀ⤌⧊ࢆ୰ᚰぢ┤ࡋࠊᨵၿྲྀ⤌ࢇࡔࠋ ࣭ෆᐜᛂࡌ࡚Ꮫ㛗ࠊ㛵㐃㒊ᒁࠊᏛ㒊ࠊ◊✲⛉ࡢྲྀ⤌ࡳࡋ࡚ᨵၿࢆ㐍ࡵ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ ࣭ᣦࡉࢀࡓෆᐜࢆ⟶㎄ࡍࡿጤဨ࠾࠸᳨࡚ウࡋࠊᩍᤵ࠾࠸࡚Ỵᐃࡋᨵၿࡋࡓࠋ ࣭ἲேࡢ⟶⌮㐠Ⴀಀࢃࡿ㡯࡛࠶ࡗࡓࡓࡵࠊ⌮㛗ࡀ୰ᚰ࡞ࡗ࡚ᨵၿࡋࡓࠋ ࣭Ꮫᰯἲேࡢ⟶⌮㐠Ⴀ㛵ࡍࡿᣦࡘ࠸࡚ࡣ⌮㛗ࡀ୰ᚰ࡞ࡗ࡚ࠊࡲࡓࠊᏛ㛵ࡍ ࡿᣦࡘ࠸࡚ࡣᏛ㛗ࡀ୰ᚰ࡞ࡗ࡚ࠊྛ㒊⨫ࡀࡑࡢᨵၿྲྀ⤌ࢇ࡛࠸ࡿࠋ ࣭㈈ົ㛵ಀࡣἲேᮏ㒊ࡀ୰ᚰ࡞ࡗ࡚ᨵၿດࡵ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ 31 タၥᣦ㡯ࡢᨵၿ≧ἣࡘ࠸࡚ᩍ࠼࡚ࡃࡔࡉ࠸ࠋ ㄆドホ౯࠾ࡅࡿᣦ㡯ࡘ࠸࡚ࡢᨵၿ≧ἣࡘ࠸࡚ࠊࠕබ⾲ࡉࢀࡓཧ⪃ពぢࢆᨵၿ ࡋࡓࠋࠖᅇ⟅ࡋࡓᏛࡀ 142 ᰯ(55.0%)ࠊࠕබ⾲ࡉࢀࡓᨵၿࢆせࡍࡿⅬࢆᨵၿࡋࡓࠋࠖ ᅇ⟅ࡋࡓᏛࡀ 131 ᰯ(50.8%)ࠊࠕᏛࡢࡳ㏻▱ࡉࢀࡓཧ⪃ពぢࢆᨵၿࡋࡓࠋࠖᅇ ⟅ࡋࡓᏛࡀ 123 ᰯ(47.7%)ࠊࠕᏛࡢࡳ㏻▱ࡉࢀࡓᨵၿࢆせࡍࡿⅬࢆᨵၿࡋࡓࠋࠖ ᅇ⟅ࡋࡓᏛࡀ 114 ᰯ(44.2%)ࠊࠕࡑࡢࠖᅇ⟅ࡋࡓᏛࡀ 21 ᰯ(8.1%)࡛࠶ࡗࡓࠋ බ⾲࣭㠀බ⾲㛵ࢃࡽࡎࠊᣦ㡯ࡘ࠸࡚ࡣ⣙༙ᩘࡢᏛࡀᨵၿྥࡅ࡚ྲྀ⤌ࢇࡔࡇ ࡀศࡿࠋࡲࡓࠊࠕཧ⪃ពぢࠖࡣࠊࠕᨵၿࢆせࡍࡿⅬࠖࡋ࡚ᣦࡍࡿ࡛ࡣ࡞࠸ࡀࠊ ᨵၿࡘ࠸࡚Ꮫෆ᳨࡛ウࡋ࡚ࡋ࠸㡯ࡘ࠸࡚ᣦࡍࡿෆᐜ࡛࠶ࡿࡀࠊࠕཧ⪃ពぢࠖࢆ ᨵၿࡋࡓᏛࡶከࡃ࠶ࡿࡇࡀ࠺ࡀ࠼ࡿࠋࡇࢀࡣࠊᏛࡢࠕᨵၿࢆせࡍࡿⅬࠖࡢᣦ ᩘࡀ 389 ௳ࡔࡗࡓࡢᑐࡋࠊࠕཧ⪃ពぢࠖࡣ 661 ௳ከࡃࠊᣦᩘẚࡋ࡚ᨵၿྲྀ⤌ ࢇࡔᏛࡀከࡃ࠶ࡗࡓࡢ࡛ࡣ࡞࠸ᛮࢃࢀࡿࠋ ࡞࠾ࠊࠕࡑࡢࠖᅇ⟅ࡋࡓᏛࡢពぢࡣࠊࠕ⥲ホཬࡧุᐃ⌮⏤ࡽࡶᨵၿࡍࡁ ࢆㄞࡳྲྀࡾᨵၿࡋࡓࠋࠖࠕࠕබ⾲ࡉࢀࡓཧ⪃ពぢࠖࠕᏛࡢࡳ㏻▱ࡉࢀࡓཧ⪃ពぢࠖ ࡘ࠸࡚ࡶᨵၿྥࡅࡓྲྀ⤌ࡳࢆ⥅⥆ࡋ࡚࠾ࡾࠊ୰ࡣᨵၿ῭ࡳࡢࡶࡢࡶྵࡲࢀࡿࠋࠖ࡞ ࡢពぢࡀ࠶ࡗࡓࠋ 㻌 ᅇ⟅ᩘ㻌 ᅇ⟅ẚ㻌 㻌 䐟බ⾲䛥䜜䛯ᨵၿ䜢せ䛩䜛Ⅼ䜢ᨵၿ䛧䛯䚹㻌 㻝㻟㻝㻌 㻡㻜㻚㻤㻑㻌 㻌 䐠Ꮫ䛾䜏䛻㏻▱䛥䜜䛯ᨵၿ䜢せ䛩䜛Ⅼ䜢ᨵၿ䛧䛯䚹㻌 㻝㻝㻠㻌 㻠㻠㻚㻞㻑㻌 㻌 䐡බ⾲䛥䜜䛯ཧ⪃ពぢ䜢ᨵၿ䛧䛯䚹㻌 㻝㻠㻞㻌 㻡㻡㻚㻜㻑㻌 㻌 䐢Ꮫ䛾䜏䛻㏻▱䛥䜜䛯ཧ⪃ពぢ䜢ᨵၿ䛧䛯䚹㻌 㻝㻞㻟㻌 㻠㻣㻚㻣㻑㻌 㻌 䐣䛭䛾㻌 㻞㻝㻌 㻤㻚㻝㻑㻌 㻌 䐤↓ᅇ⟅㻌 㻝㻞㻌 㻠㻚㻣㻑㻌 ϭϲϬ ϭϰϬ ϭϰϮ ϭϯϭ ϭϮϯ ϭϭϰ ϭϮϬ ϭϬϬ ϴϬ ϲϬ ϰϬ Ϯϭ ϭϮ ϮϬ Ϭ 䐟 䐠 䐡 䐢 䐣 䐤 ࡞ពぢࡣ௨ୗࡢ㏻ࡾࠋ ࣭Ꮫࡢࡳ㏻▱ࡉࢀࡓᨵၿࢆせࡍࡿⅬࠊබ⾲ࡉࢀࡓཧ⪃ពぢࠊᏛࡢࡳ㏻▱ࡉࢀࡓཧ ⪃ពぢࡢ୍㒊ࢆᨵၿࡋࡓ㸦බ⾲ࡉࢀࡓᨵၿࢆせࡍࡿⅬࡣ↓ࡗࡓ㸧ࠋ ࣭⥲ホཬࡧุᐃ⌮⏤ࡽࡶᨵၿࡍࡁࢆㄞࡳྲྀࡾᨵၿࡋࡓࠋ ࣭ᨵၿࡉࢀࡓࡶࡢࡶ࠶ࢀࡤᑂ㆟୰ࡢࡶࡢࡶ࠶ࡿࠋ 32 ࣭ࠕබ⾲ࡉࢀࡓཧ⪃ពぢࠖࠕᏛࡢࡳ㏻▱ࡉࢀࡓཧ⪃ពぢࠖࡘ࠸࡚ࡶᨵၿྥࡅࡓྲྀ ⤌ࡳࢆ⥅⥆ࡋ࡚࠾ࡾࠊ୰ࡣᨵၿ῭ࡳࡢࡶࡢࡶྵࡲࢀࡿࠋ ࣭ࠕཧ⪃ពぢࠖࡘ࠸࡚ࡣࠊ᳨ウࡋྲྀ⤌ࢇ࡛࠸ࡿࡇࢁ࡛࠶ࡿࠋ タၥ๓ᅇࡢㄆドホ౯࠾ࡅࡿᣦ㡯ࢆᨵၿࡍࡿ࠶ࡓࡾࠊ㞀ᐖ࡞ࡗࡓ㸦࡞ࡗ ࡚࠸ࡿ㸧ࡶࡢࡣ࠶ࡾࡲࡍࠋ ㄆドホ౯࠾ࡅࡿᣦ㡯ࢆᨵၿࡍࡿ࠶ࡓࡾࠊ㞀ᐖ࡞ࡗࡓࠊࡶࡋࡃࡣ㞀ᐖ࡞ࡗ࡚ ࠸ࡿࡶࡢࡀ࠶ࡿࡘ࠸࡚ࠊ᭱ࡶከࡗࡓᅇ⟅ࡣࠕ㞀ᐖࡣ࡞࠸࡛ࠖ࠶ࡾࠊ135 ᰯ࡛యࡢ 52.3%࡛࠶ࡗࡓࠋ㞀ᐖࡀ࠶ࡗࡓሙྜࡘ࠸࡚ࡣࠊ ࠕົ⫋ဨࡢᴗົ㔞ࡢቑຍࠖࡀ 50 ᰯ(19.4%)ࠊ ࠕᩍဨࡢᴗົ㔞ࡢቑຍࠖࡀ 46 ᰯ(17.8%)ࠊࠕᨵၿᚲせ࡞ண⟬ᥐ⨨ࠖࡀ 44 ᰯ㸦17.1%) ഹᕪ࡛⥆࠸ࡓࠋ ࡑࢀ௨እࡢ㑅ᢥ⫥࠶ࡿ㆟యࡸ⤌⧊ࡢ⌮ゎࡸᨭࡘ࠸࡚ࡣࠊࡑࡢ㑅ᢥ⫥༢⊂࡛ࡢ㑅 ᢥࡣࢇ࡞ࡃࠊ」ᩘ㑅ᢥࡢ୍ࡘࡋ࡚㑅ᢥࡉࢀ࡚࠸ࡓࡀࠊࠕົ⫋ဨࡢᴗົ㔞ࡢቑຍࠖ ࠕᩍဨࡢᴗົ㔞ࡢቑຍࠖࡘ࠸࡚ࡣࠊࡑࡢ⣙༙ᩘ௨ୖࡀ୍⥴㑅ᢥࡉࢀ࡚࠸ࡓࠋ ࡞࠾ࠊࠕࡑࡢࠖᅇ⟅ࡋࡓᏛࡢពぢࡣࠊࠕㄆドホ౯ࡢᚲせᛶ㛵ࡍࡿ⌮ゎࡣ༑ศ ࡛࠶ࡿࡀࠊᨵၿࢆᐇࡍࡿ࠶ࡓࡗ࡚ࡣࠊᩍ⫋ဨࡢ⌮ゎࢆࡼࡾ῝ࡵࡿᚲせࡀ࠶ࡿࠋࠖࠕἲ ேᮏ㒊㛵ࢃࡿ㡯ࡘ࠸࡚ࡣࠊᏛࡣ༑ศᢕᥱ࡛ࡁ࡞࠸ࡇࢁࡀ࠶ࡗࡓࠋࠖ࡞ࡢព ぢࡀ࠶ࡗࡓࠋ 㻌 ᅇ⟅ᩘ㻌 㻌 䐟㞀ᐖ䛿䛺䛔㻌 ᅇ⟅ẚ㻌 㻝㻟㻡㻌 㻡㻞㻚㻟㻑㻌 㻌 䐠⌮䛾⌮ゎ䜔ᨭ㻌 㻤㻌 㻟㻚㻝㻑㻌 㻌 䐡ᩍᤵ䛾⌮ゎ䜔ᨭ㻌 㻢㻌 㻞㻚㻟㻑㻌 㻌 䐢ᩍဨ⤌⧊䛾⌮ゎ䜔ᨭ㻌 㻞㻟㻌 㻤㻚㻥㻑㻌 㻌 䐣ᩍဨ䛾ᴗົ㔞䛾ቑຍ㻌 㻠㻢㻌 㻝㻣㻚㻤㻑㻌 㻌 䐤ົ⤌⧊䛾⌮ゎ䜔ᨭ㻌 㻝㻡㻌 㻡㻚㻤㻑㻌 㻌 䐥ົ⫋ဨ䛾ᴗົ㔞䛾ቑຍ㻌 㻡㻜㻌 㻝㻥㻚㻠㻑㻌 㻌 䐦ᨵၿ䛻ᚲせ䛺ண⟬ᥐ⨨㻌 㻠㻠㻌 㻝㻣㻚㻝㻑㻌 㻌 䐧䛭䛾㻌 㻝㻢㻌 㻢㻚㻞㻑㻌 㻌 䐨↓ᅇ⟅㻌 㻝㻡㻌 㻡㻚㻤㻑㻌 ϭϰϬ ϭϯϱ ϭϮϬ ϭϬϬ ϴϬ ϲϬ ϱϬ ϰϲ ϰϬ Ϯϯ ϮϬ ϴ ϲ 䐠 䐡 ϰϰ ϭϱ ϭϲ ϭϱ 䐧 䐨 Ϭ 䐟 䐢 䐣 䐤 䐥 䐦 33 ࡞ពぢࡣ௨ୗࡢ㏻ࡾࠋ ࣭⌧࢟ࣕࣥࣃࢫࡢ❧ᆅࡢᝏࡉࠊ㛗ᘬࡃ⤒῭ἣࠊఙࡧᝎࡴᏛ㐍Ꮫ⋡ࠋ ࣭ἲேᮏ㒊㛵ࢃࡿ㡯ࡘ࠸࡚ࡣࠊᏛࡣ༑ศᢕᥱ࡛ࡁ࡞࠸ࡇࢁࡀ࠶ࡗࡓࠋ ࣭ᐜᐃဨࡢ㊊࡞ࠊᨵၿດຊࢆ⾜ࡗ࡚࠸ࡿࡶࡢࡢࠊ࡞࡞⤖ᯝࡢకࢃ࡞࠸㡯ࡀ࠶ ࡿࠋ ࣭ㄆドホ౯ࡢᚲせᛶ㛵ࡍࡿ⌮ゎࡣ༑ศ࡛࠶ࡿࡀࠊᨵၿࢆᐇࡍࡿ࠶ࡓࡗ࡚ࡣࠊᩍ⫋ဨ ࡢ⌮ゎࢆࡼࡾ῝ࡵࡿᚲせࡀ࠶ࡿࠋ ࣭㈈ົ≧ἣࡢᣦࡘ࠸࡚ᨵၿྲྀ⤌ࢇ࡛࠸ࡿࡀண⟬ᩍ⫋ဨᩘࡢࣂࣛࣥࢫࡢྲྀࡾ᪉ࡀ 㞴ࡋ࠸࡞ᨵ㠉㏵ୖ࠶ࡿࠋ ࣭ྠ୍࢟ࣕࣥࣃࢫෆࡢ୰Ꮫ࣭㧗ᰯࡢྜྠ㑊㞴カ⦎ࡢᐇࡘ࠸࡚ࠊᏛ᪥⛬ࡢㄪᩚᅔ 㞴ࢆᢪ࠼࡚࠸ࡿࠋ タၥᏛࡢホ౯⤖ᯝࢆ☜ㄆࡋཧ⪃ࡋࡲࡋࡓࠋ Ꮫࡢホ౯⤖ᯝࢆ☜ㄆࡋཧ⪃ࡋࡓࡘ࠸࡚ࠊࠕ⏦ㄳ๓☜ㄆࡋཧ⪃ࡋࡓࠋࠖࡀ ᭱ࡶከࡃ 192 ᰯ(74.4%)࡛࠶ࡗࡓࠋḟከࡗࡓࡢࡀࠕ⏦ㄳᚋ㹼ሗ࿌᭩ᥦฟࡲ࡛☜ㄆࡋ ཧ⪃ࡋࡓࠋ࡛ࠖ 137 ᰯ(53.1%)ࠊࠕሗ࿌᭩ᥦฟᚋ㹼ᐇᆅㄪᰝࡲ࡛☜ㄆࡋཧ⪃ࡋࡓࠋࠖ ࡀ 97 ᰯ(37.6%)⥆࠸ࡓࠋ ๓༙ࡢᏛᚋ༙ࡢᏛࢆẚ㍑ࡋࡓሙྜࠊ๓༙ࡢᏛࡢྜࡀከࡗࡓࡢࡀࠕཧ⪃ࡋ ࡚࠸࡞࠸ࠋ࡛ࠖࠊࡑࢀ௨እࡢ㑅ᢥ⫥ࡘ࠸࡚ࡣᚋ༙ࡢᏛࡢྜࡀከࡗࡓࠋࠕཧ⪃ࡋ ࡚࠸࡞࠸ࠋࠖࡀ๓༙ࡢᏛከࡗࡓ⌮⏤ࡋ࡚ࡣࠊཷᑂᏛᩘࡸࠕᨵၿࢆせࡍࡿⅬࠖ࡞ ࡢᣦࡀᑡ࡞ࡗࡓࡓࡵ࡛ࡣ࡞࠸ᛮࢃࢀࡿࠋ 㻌 ᅇ⟅ᩘ㻌 㻌 䐟ཧ⪃䛻䛧䛶䛔䛺䛔䚹㻌 ᅇ⟅ẚ㻌 㻞㻢㻌 㻝㻜㻚㻝㻑㻌 㻌 䐠⏦ㄳ๓䛻☜ㄆ䛧ཧ⪃䛻䛧䛯䚹㻌 㻝㻥㻞㻌 㻣㻠㻚㻠㻑㻌 㻌 䐡⏦ㄳᚋ䡚ሗ࿌᭩ᥦฟ䜎䛷䛻☜ㄆ䛧ཧ⪃䛻䛧䛯䚹㻌 㻝㻟㻣㻌 㻡㻟㻚㻝㻑㻌 㻌 䐢ሗ࿌᭩ᥦฟᚋ䡚ᐇᆅㄪᰝ䜎䛷䛻☜ㄆ䛧ཧ⪃䛻䛧䛯䚹㻌 㻥㻣㻌 㻟㻣㻚㻢㻑㻌 㻌 䐣ᐇᆅㄪᰝ⤊ᚋ䛻☜ㄆ䛧ཧ⪃䛻䛧䛯䚹㻌 㻢㻤㻌 㻞㻢㻚㻠㻑㻌 㻣㻌 㻞㻚㻣㻑㻌 㻌 䐤↓ᅇ⟅㻌 ϭϵϮ ϮϬϬ ϭϯϳ ϭϱϬ ϵϳ ϭϬϬ ϱϬ ϲϴ Ϯϲ ϳ Ϭ 䐟 䐠 䐡 䐢 䐣 䐤 34 㸦 㸧ෆࡣᅇ⟅Ꮫᩘ 㻌 㻝㻣㻙㻞㻜 ᖺᗘ䠄㻝㻜㻥䠅㻌 㻌 㻌 ᅇ⟅ᩘ㻌 ᅇ⟅ẚ㻌 㻞㻝㻘㻞㻞 ᖺᗘ㻔㻝㻠㻥㻕㻌 ᅇ⟅ᩘ㻌 㸦17-20 ᖺᗘᅇ⟅ẚ㸸 ᅇ⟅ẚ㻌 㻌 䐟㻌 㻝㻡㻌 㻝㻟㻚㻤㻑㻌 㻝㻝㻌 㻣㻚㻠㻑㻌 㻌 䐠㻌 㻣㻟㻌 㻢㻣㻚㻜㻑㻌 㻝㻝㻥㻌 㻣㻥㻚㻥㻑㻌 㻌 䐡㻌 㻠㻤㻌 㻠㻠㻚㻜㻑㻌 㻤㻥㻌 㻡㻥㻚㻣㻑㻌 㻌 䐢㻌 㻟㻠㻌 㻟㻝㻚㻞㻑㻌 㻢㻟㻌 㻠㻞㻚㻟㻑㻌 㻌 䐣㻌 㻞㻢㻌 㻞㻟㻚㻥㻑㻌 㻠㻞㻌 㻞㻤㻚㻞㻑㻌 㻌 䐤㻌 㻢㻌 㻡㻚㻡㻑㻌 㻝㻌 㻜㻚㻣㻑㻌 ᅇ⟅Ꮫᩘ㸦109㸧ᑐࡍࡿᅇ⟅ࡢẚ⋡㸧 㸦21,22 ᖺᗘᅇ⟅ẚ㸸 ᅇ⟅Ꮫᩘ㸦149㸧ᑐࡍࡿᅇ⟅ࡢẚ⋡㸧 㸦ྛᅇ⟅ࡢྜィࢆ 100%ࡋࡓሙྜࡢᖺᗘูࡢྜ㸧 䐟 ϲϱ͘ϭй 䐠 ϰϱ͘ϲй ϰϮ͘ϰй ϱϳ͘ϲй 䐢 ϰϮ͘ϱй ϱϳ͘ϱй ϰϱ͘ϴй 䐤 ϱϰ͘Ϯй ϴϵ͘ϭй Ϭй ϮϬй Ϯϭ͕ϮϮᖺᗘ ϱϰ͘ϰй 䐡 䐣 ϭϳͲϮϬᖺᗘ ϯϰ͘ϵй ϰϬй ϭϬ͘ϵй ϲϬй ϴϬй ϭϬϬй タၥㄆドホ౯ࡢ⤖ᯝ☜ᐃᚋࠊ⮬ᕫホ౯ሗ࿌᭩ࢆࡢࡼ࠺බ⾲ࡋࡲࡋࡓࠋ ㄆドホ౯ࡢ⤖ᯝ☜ᐃᚋࠊ⮬ᕫホ౯ሗ࿌᭩ࢆࡢࡼ࠺බ⾲ࡋࡓࡘ࠸࡚ࠊࠕ࣮࣒࣍࣌ ࣮ࢪ࡛බ㛤ࡋࡓࠋࠖᅇ⟅ࡋࡓᏛࡀ 245 ᰯ(95.0%)ࠊࠕᏊࡋ࡚ห⾜ࡋࠊ㛵ಀ⪅㓄 ᕸࡋࡓࠋࠖᅇ⟅ࡋࡓᏛࡀ 120 ᰯ(46.5%)ࠊࠕᗈሗㄅࡸ࣮࣒࣮࣍࣌ࢪ➼ᴫせࢆᥖ㍕ࡋ ࡓࠋࠖᅇ⟅ࡋࡓᏛࡀ 41 ᰯ(15.9%)ࠊࠕᏛෆ㜀ぴሙᡤࢆタࡅࡓࠋࠖᅇ⟅ࡋࡓᏛࡀ 40 ᰯ(15.5%)ࠊࠕࡑࡢࠖᅇ⟅ࡋࡓᏛࡀ 7 ᰯ(2.7%)࡛࠶ࡗࡓࠋ ホ౯⤖ᯝࢆ㏦ࡍࡿ㝿⮬ᕫホ౯ሗ࿌᭩ࢆ࣮࣒࣮࣍࣌ࢪ࡛බ⾲ࡋࠊホ౯ᶵᵓࡢ࣮࣒࣍࣌ ࣮ࢪࣜࣥࢡࡉࡏ࡚࠸ࡓࡔࡃࡇࢆ౫㢗ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࡇࡶ࠶ࡾࠊࢇࡢᏛࡀࠕ࣮࣒࣍ ࣮࣌ࢪ࡛බ㛤ࡋࡓࠋࠖᅇ⟅ࡋࡓࠋࡲࡓࠊᏛᰯᩍ⫱ἲࡢ 109 ᮲ࠕ⮬ࡽⅬ᳨ཬࡧホ౯ࢆ⾜ ࠸ࠊࡑࡢ⤖ᯝࢆබ⾲ࡍࡿࡶࡢࡍࡿࠋࠖつᐃࡉࢀ࡚࠸ࡿࡇࡶ࠶ࡾࠊࠕබ⾲ࡋ࡚࠸࡞࠸ࠖ ᅇ⟅ࡋࡓᏛࡣ 0 ᰯ࡛࠶ࡗࡓࠋ ࡞࠾ࠊࠕࡑࡢࠖᅇ⟅ࡋࡓᏛࡢពぢࡣࠊࠕྠ୍┴ෆࡢᏛࠊ᪥ᮏ⚾❧Ꮫ༠ຍ ┕ᏛࠊᏛᰯἲேࡢᚋ⤌⧊ຍ┕ᴗᏊࢆ㏦ࡋࡓࠋࠖࠕᏛෆࣥࢺࣛࢿࢵࢺ࡛බ 㛤ࡋࡓࠋࠖ࡞✚ᴟⓗබ⾲ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿᵝᏊࡀ࠺ࡀ࠼ࡓࠋ 35 㻌 ᅇ⟅ᩘ㻌 㻌 䐟බ⾲䛧䛶䛔䛺䛔䚹㻌 ᅇ⟅ẚ㻌 㻜㻌 㻜㻚㻜㻑㻌 㻌 䐠䝩䞊䝮䝨䞊䝆䛷බ㛤䛧䛯䚹㻌 㻞㻠㻡㻌 㻥㻡㻚㻜㻑㻌 㻌 䐡Ꮚ䛸䛧䛶ห⾜䛧䚸㛵ಀ⪅䛻㓄ᕸ䛧䛯䚹㻌 㻝㻞㻜㻌 㻠㻢㻚㻡㻑㻌 㻌 䐢ᗈሗㄅ䜔䝩䞊䝮䝨䞊䝆➼䛻ᴫせ䜢ᥖ㍕䛧䛯䚹㻌 㻠㻝㻌 㻝㻡㻚㻥㻑㻌 㻌 䐣Ꮫෆ䛻㜀ぴሙᡤ䜢タ䛡䛯䚹㻌 㻠㻜㻌 㻝㻡㻚㻡㻑㻌 㻌 䐤䛭䛾㻌 㻣㻌 㻞㻚㻣㻑㻌 㻌 䐥↓ᅇ⟅㻌 㻢㻌 㻞㻚㻟㻑㻌 Ϯϰϱ ϮϱϬ ϮϬϬ ϭϱϬ ϭϮϬ ϭϬϬ ϰϭ ϱϬ ϰϬ Ϭ ϳ ϲ 䐤 䐥 Ϭ 䐟 䐠 䐡 䐢 䐣 ࡞ពぢࡣ௨ୗࡢ㏻ࡾࠋ ࣭㒊ᒁ㛗ࠊྜྠᩍᤵࢆ㏻ࡌࠊ⮬ᕫホ౯ሗ࿌᭩ࡀ࣮࣒࣮࣍࣌ࢪබ㛤ࡉࢀ࡚࠸ࡿࡇࢆ ᗘࠎሗ࿌ࡋࡓࠋ ࣭Ꮫෆࣥࢺࣛࢿࢵࢺ࡛බ㛤ࡋࡓࠋ ࣭ᅗ᭩㤋㓄ᯫࡋࡓࠋ ࣭CD-ROM ࢆసᡂࡋࠊ㛵ಀ⪅㓄ᕸࡋࡓࠋ ࣭ྠ୍┴ෆࡢᏛࠊ᪥ᮏ⚾❧Ꮫ༠ຍ┕ᏛࠊᏛᰯἲேࡢᚋ⤌⧊ຍ┕ᴗᏊࢆ ㏦ࡋࡓࠋ ࣭ಖㆤ⪅ࢆ㏻ࡌ࡚ಖㆤ⪅㓄ᕸࡋࡓࠋ ࣭ᙺဨཬࡧᩍ⫋ဨ㓄ࡋࡓࠋ タၥㄆドホ౯ࡢ⤖ᯝࢆࢫࢸ࣮ࢡ࣍ࣝࢲ࣮➼ㄝ᫂ࡋࡲࡋࡓࠋ ㄆドホ౯ࡢ⤖ᯝࢆࢫࢸ࣮ࢡ࣍ࣝࢲ࣮➼ㄝ᫂ࡋࡓࡘ࠸࡚ࠊࠕㄝ᫂ࡋ࡚࠸࡞࠸ࠋࠖ ᅇ⟅ࡋࡓᏛࡀ 1 ᰯ࠶ࡗࡓࠋㄝ᫂ࡋࡓᏛ࡛ࡣࠊࠕᩍᤵ➼࡛ᩍ⫋ဨㄝ᫂ࡋࡓࠋࠖᅇ ⟅ࡋࡓᏛࡀ 243 ᰯ(94.2%)ࠊࠕ⌮➼࡛ᙺဨㄝ᫂ࡋࡓࠋࠖᅇ⟅ࡋࡓᏛࡀ 209 ᰯ (81.0%)ࠊࠕಖㆤ⪅➼࡛ᅾᏛ⏕ࡢಖㆤ⪅ㄝ᫂ࡋࡓࠋࠖᅇ⟅ࡋࡓᏛࡀ 64 ᰯ(24.8%)ࠊ ࠕㄝ᫂ࡸ㧗ᰯゼၥ➼࡛㧗ᰯᩍဨㄝ᫂ࡋࡓࠋࠖᅇ⟅ࡋࡓᏛࡀ 50 ᰯ(19.4%)ࠊࠕ࢜ࣜ ࢚ࣥࢸ࣮ࢩࣙࣥ➼࡛ᅾᏛ⏕ㄝ᫂ࡋࡓࠋࠖᅇ⟅ࡋࡓᏛࡀ 34 ᰯ(13.2%)ࠊࠕධヨㄝ᫂ ➼࡛ධᏛᚿᮃ⪅ㄝ᫂ࡋࡓࠋࠖᅇ⟅ࡋࡓᏛࡀ 28 ᰯ(10.9%)ࠊࠕࡑࡢࠖᅇ⟅ࡋࡓ Ꮫࡀ 16 ᰯ(6.2%)࡛࠶ࡗࡓࠋᙜ⪅࠸࠺ほⅬ࠾࠸࡚ࡣࠊᩍᤵࡸ⌮ࡢㄝ᫂ẚ ࡚ࠊᅾᏛ⏕ㄝ᫂ࡋࡓᏛࡀᑡ࡞࠸ࠋࡲࡓࠊࢫࢸ࣮ࢡ࣍ࣝࢲ࣮ࡢ㛵ಀᛶࡼࡗ࡚ㄝ᫂ࡢ 36 ෆᐜࡸᡭẁࡶ␗࡞ࡿᛮࢃࢀࡿࡓࡵࠊࡑࡢ≧ἣࡸㄝ᫂ࢆཷࡅࡓ┦ᡭࡢᛂ࡞ࡘ࠸࡚ࡶ ☜ㄆࡋࡓ࠸ࠋ ࡞࠾ࠊࠕࡑࡢࠖᅇ⟅ࡋࡓᏛࡢពぢࡣࠊࠕᆅඖ᪂⪺ࡢグࡋ࡚ࠊᆅᇦఫẸᗈ ࡃබ⾲ࡋࡓࠋࠖࠕࣃࣥࣇࣞࢵࢺࠊྡ่࡞✚ᴟⓗㄆᐃ࣐࣮ࢡࢆ㉳⏝ࡋࠊᚲせᛂࡌㄝ ᫂ࡋࡓࠋࠖ࡞ࡢពぢࡀ࠶ࡗࡓࠋ 㻌 ᅇ⟅ᩘ㻌 㻌 䐟ㄝ᫂䛧䛶䛔䛺䛔䚹㻌 ᅇ⟅ẚ㻌 㻝㻌 㻜㻚㻠㻑㻌 㻌 䐠⌮➼䛷ᙺဨ䛻ㄝ᫂䛧䛯䚹㻌 㻞㻜㻥㻌 㻤㻝㻚㻜㻑㻌 㻌 䐡ᩍᤵ➼䛷ᩍ⫋ဨ䛻ㄝ᫂䛧䛯䚹㻌 㻞㻠㻟㻌 㻥㻠㻚㻞㻑㻌 㻌 䐢䜸䝸䜶䞁䝔䞊䝅䝵䞁➼䛷ᅾᏛ⏕䛻ㄝ᫂䛧䛯䚹㻌 㻟㻠㻌 㻝㻟㻚㻞㻑㻌 㻌 䐣ಖㆤ⪅➼䛷ᅾᏛ⏕䛾ಖㆤ⪅䛻ㄝ᫂䛧䛯䚹㻌 㻢㻠㻌 㻞㻠㻚㻤㻑㻌 㻌 䐤ධヨㄝ᫂➼䛷ධᏛᚿᮃ⪅䛻ㄝ᫂䛧䛯䚹㻌 㻞㻤㻌 㻝㻜㻚㻥㻑㻌 㻌 䐥ㄝ᫂䜔㧗ᰯゼၥ➼䛷㧗ᰯᩍဨ䛻ㄝ᫂䛧䛯䚹㻌 㻡㻜㻌 㻝㻥㻚㻠㻑㻌 㻌 䐦䛭䛾㻌 㻝㻢㻌 㻢㻚㻞㻑㻌 㻌 䐧↓ᅇ⟅㻌 㻣㻌 㻞㻚㻣㻑㻌 Ϯϰϯ ϮϱϬ ϮϬϵ ϮϬϬ ϭϱϬ ϭϬϬ ϲϰ ϯϰ ϱϬ ϱϬ Ϯϴ ϭ ϭϲ ϳ 䐦 䐧 Ϭ 䐟 䐠 䐡 䐢 䐣 䐤 䐥 ࡞ពぢࡣ௨ୗࡢ㏻ࡾࠋ ࣭ㄆドホ౯ሗ࿌᭩ࢆ⮬ᕫホ౯ሗ࿌᭩ྜࡏ࡚ࠊᏛෆྥࡅࡣᏊ㓄ᕸࠊᏛእྥࡅࡣ࣮࣍ ࣒࣮࣌ࢪᥖ㍕ࠋ ࣭ᩍ⫋ဨࡢྡ่ㄆᐃ࣐࣮ࢡࢆධࢀ࡚࿘▱ࢆᅗࡗࡓࠋ ࣭ࣃࣥࣇࣞࢵࢺࠊྡ่࡞✚ᴟⓗㄆᐃ࣐࣮ࢡࢆ㉳⏝ࡋࠊᚲせᛂࡌㄝ᫂ࡋࡓࠋ ࣭ホ౯ሗ࿌᭩ࡢබ⾲ඹ࣮࣒࣮࣍࣌ࢪୖ࡛ㄝ᫂ࡋࡓࠋ ࣭Ꮫࡀᡤᅾࡍࡿ⮬యሗ࿌ࡋࡓࠋ ࣭ㄆᐃドࡢࡋࢆᘓᏛࡢ⢭⚄ࡶᏛෆタෆᥖ♧ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ ࣭ᩍᏛ࣭⤒Ⴀࡢ㛵ಀࢺࢵࣉ㆟࡛ㄝ᫂ࡋࡓࠋ ࣭ᣦࡉࢀࡓࠕඃࢀࡓⅬࠖࠕཧ⪃ពぢࠖ࡞ࡢᴫせࢆ࣮࣒࣮࣍࣌ࢪ࡚බ㛤ࡋࡓࠋ ࣭Ꮫෆ࣓࣮࡛ࣝᩍ⫋ဨㄪᰝሗ࿌᭩ࢆ࣮࣒࣮࣍࣌ࢪ࡛බ㛤ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࡇࢆ▱ࡽࡏࡓࠋ ࣭Ꮫ⏕ࠊಖㆤ⪅ᑐࡋࠊࣃࣥࣇࣞࢵࢺࡼࡾᴫせࢆ㏻▱ࡋࡓࠋ ࣭ᆅඖ᪂⪺ࡢグࡋ࡚ࠊᆅᇦఫẸᗈࡃබ⾲ࡋࡓࠋ ࣭ᗈሗㄅ࡞࡛࿘▱ࡋࡓࠋ ࣭せᮃࡼࡾ⌮㛗ࠊᏛ㛗ࠊLO ࡞ࡀಶูㄝ᫂ࠊᑐᛂࡋࡓࠋ 37 タၥㄆドホ౯ཷᑂᚋ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯ࢆᐇࡋ࡚࠸ࡲࡍࠋ ㄆドホ౯ཷᑂᚋ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯ࢆᐇࡋࡓࡘ࠸࡚ࠊ ࠕࡣ࠸ࠖࡢᅇ⟅ࡀ 258 ᰯ୰ 190 ᰯ(73.6%)ࠊࠕ࠸࠸࠼ࠖࡢᅇ⟅ࡀ 60 ᰯ(23.3%)࡛࠶ࡗࡓࠋ ᖺᗘࡈᕪࡀ࠶ࡾࠊࡲࡓࠊཷᑂᚋࡢ᪥ࡀὸ࠸ࠕ࠸࠸࠼ࠖࡢᏛࡀከࡃ࡞ࡗ࡚࠸ࡿ ࡶࡢࡢࠊྛᖺᗘࡶ 7 ௨ୖࡢᏛࡀㄆドホ౯ᚋ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯ࢆᐇࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ 㻌 䛿䛔㻌 㻝㻥㻜㻌 㻣㻟㻚㻢㻑㻌 㻌 䛔䛔䛘㻌 㻢㻜㻌 㻞㻟㻚㻟㻑㻌 㻌 ↓ᅇ⟅㻌 㻤㻌 㻟㻚㻝㻑㻌 㸦ཷᑂᖺᗘูෆヂ㸧 㸦 㸧ෆࡣᅇ⟅Ꮫᩘ 㻌 䛿䛔㻌 ᅇ⟅ẚ㻌 䛔䛔䛘㻌 ᅇ⟅ẚ㻌 ↓ᅇ⟅㻌 ᅇ⟅ẚ㻌 㻌 㻝㻣 ᖺᗘ㻔㻠㻕㻌 㻟㻌 㻣㻡㻚㻜㻑㻌 㻜㻌 㻜㻚㻜㻑㻌 㻝㻌 㻞㻡㻚㻜㻑㻌 㻌 㻝㻤 ᖺᗘ㻔㻝㻡㻕㻌 㻝㻠㻌 㻥㻟㻚㻟㻑㻌 㻝㻌 㻢㻚㻣㻑㻌 㻜㻌 㻜㻚㻜㻑㻌 㻌 㻝㻥 ᖺᗘ㻔㻟㻣㻕㻌 㻞㻤㻌 㻣㻡㻚㻣㻑㻌 㻣㻌 㻝㻤㻚㻥㻑㻌 㻞㻌 㻡㻚㻠㻑㻌 㻌 㻞㻜 ᖺᗘ㻔㻡㻟㻕㻌 㻟㻤㻌 㻣㻝㻚㻣㻑㻌 㻝㻝㻌 㻞㻜㻚㻤㻑㻌 㻠㻌 㻣㻚㻡㻑㻌 㻌 㻞㻝 ᖺᗘ㻔㻢㻥㻕㻌 㻡㻜㻌 㻣㻞㻚㻡㻑㻌 㻝㻥㻌 㻞㻣㻚㻡㻑㻌 㻜㻌 㻜㻚㻜㻑㻌 㻌 㻞㻞 ᖺᗘ㻔㻤㻜㻕㻌 㻡㻣㻌 㻣㻝㻚㻟㻑㻌 㻞㻞㻌 㻞㻣㻚㻡㻑㻌 㻝㻌 㻝㻚㻟㻑㻌 ϭϳᖺᗘ ϯ ϭ 䛿䛔 䛔䛔䛘 ϭϴᖺᗘ ϭϰ ϭϵᖺᗘ ϭ ↓ᅇ⟅ ϳ Ϯϴ ϮϬᖺᗘ Ϯ ϭϭ ϯϴ Ϯϭᖺᗘ ϰ ϭϵ ϱϬ ϮϮᖺᗘ ϮϮ ϱϳ Ϭ ϮϬ ϰϬ ϲϬ ϭ ϴϬ Ꮫෆࡢ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯ཬࡧḟᅇࡢㄆドホ౯ཷᑂࡘ࠸࡚ タၥ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯ࢆᐇࡍࡿ⌮⏤ࢆ㑅ࢇ࡛ࡃࡔࡉ࠸ࠋ ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯ࢆᐇࡍࡿ⌮⏤ࡘ࠸࡚ࠊࠕᏛࡢᨵၿ࣭ᨵ㠉ᙺ❧࡚ࡿࡓࡵࠖᅇ⟅ ࡋࡓᏛࡀ 241 ᰯ(93.4%)ࠊࠕἲ௧࡛⩏ົࡉࢀ࡚࠸ࡿࡓࡵࠖᅇ⟅ࡋࡓᏛࡀ 218 ᰯ (84.5%)ࠊࠕᏛෆࡢάືෆᐜࢆᢕᥱࡍࡿࡓࡵࠖᅇ⟅ࡋࡓᏛࡀ 159 ᰯ(61.6%)ࠊࠕᏛෆ࡛ つᐃࡉࢀ࡚࠸ࡿࡓࡵࠖᅇ⟅ࡋࡓᏛࡀ 157 ᰯ(60.9%)ࠊࠕ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯ࡢ⤖ᯝࢆࡶ ㄆドホ౯ࢆ⏦ㄳࡍࡿࡓࡵࠖᅇ⟅ࡋࡓᏛࡀ 145 ᰯ(56.2%)࡛࠶ࡾࠊࠕࡑࡢࠖᅇ ⟅ࡋࡓᏛࡣ࡞ࡗࡓࠋ 38 」ᩘ㑅ᢥࡀྍ⬟࡞タၥ࡛࠶ࡗࡓࡀࠊձ㹼յࡢ࡚ࡢ㑅ᢥ⫥ࡀ ࢆ㉸࠼ࡓࠋࡲࡓࠊ࡚ ࢆ㑅ᢥࡋࡓᏛࡣ ᰯ࡛࠶ࡗࡓࠋ ࠕᏛࡢᨵၿ࣭ᨵ㠉ᙺ❧࡚ࡿࡓࡵࠖࡀ᭱ࡶከࡃ㑅ᢥࡉࢀࠊᮏ᮶ࡢ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯ࡢ┠ ⓗࡀㄆ▱ࡉࢀ࡚ࡁࡓ⤖ᯝ࠸࠼ࡿࠋ ᖺᗘࡈࡢᅇ⟅Ꮫᩘᑐࡍࡿᅇ⟅ẚࢆᢡࢀ⥺ࢢࣛࣇ⾲ࡍࠊྛ㑅ᢥ⫥࠾ࡅࡿ᥎⛣ ࡀᢕᥱ࡛ࡁࡓࠋࡇࡇ࡛ࡣࠊᏛෆ࡛ࡢつᐃࡀ㐍ࢇ࡛࠸ࡿࡇࡸㄆドホ౯ࡢࡓࡵ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ ホ౯ࢆᐇࡍࡿ࠸ࡗࡓᾘᴟⓗ࡞⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯άືࡀῶࡗ࡚ࡁࡓࡇࡀ☜ㄆ࡛ࡁࡿࠋࡇ ࢀࡽࡣࠊྛᏛࡼࡿ⮬ⓗ࡞⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯άືࡀᾐ㏱ࡋ࡚ࡁ࡚࠸ࡿࡇࢆ⾲ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ ๓༙ࡢཷᑂᏛᚋ༙ࡢᏛࢆẚ㍑ࡋࡓሙྜࠊ࡚ࡢ㑅ᢥ⫥ࡘ࠸࡚ᚋ༙ࡢᏛࡢྜ ࡀከࡗࡓࠋ≉ࠕᏛෆ࡛つᐃࡉࢀ࡚࠸ࡿࡓࡵࠖࡣࠊᚋ༙ࡢྜࡀ ࢆ㉸࠼ࡓࠋ 㻌 ᅇ⟅ᩘ㻌 ᅇ⟅ẚ㻌 㻌 䐟ἲ௧䛷⩏ົ䛥䜜䛶䛔䜛䛯䜑㻌 㻞㻝㻤㻌 㻌 䐠Ꮫෆ䛷つᐃ䛥䜜䛶䛔䜛䛯䜑㻌 㻝㻡㻣㻌 㻌 䐡Ꮫෆ䛾άືෆᐜ䜢ᢕᥱ䛩䜛䛯䜑㻌 㻝㻡㻥㻌 㻌 䐢Ꮫ䛾ᨵၿ䞉ᨵ㠉䛻ᙺ❧䛶䜛䛯䜑㻌 㻞㻠㻝㻌 㻌 䐣⮬ᕫⅬ᳨䞉ホ౯䛾⤖ᯝ䜢䜒䛸䛻ㄆドホ౯䜢⏦ㄳ䛩䜛䛯䜑㻌 㻝㻠㻡㻌 㻌 䐤䛭䛾㻌 㻜㻌 㻌 䐥↓ᅇ⟅㻌 㻢㻌 ϮϱϬ ϮϬϬ Ϯϰϭ Ϯϭϴ ϭϱϳ ϭϱϵ ϭϰϱ ϭϱϬ ϭϬϬ ϱϬ Ϭ ϲ 䐤 䐥 Ϭ 䐟 䐠 䐡 䐢 䐣 㻌 㻝㻣 ᖺᗘ㻌 㻝㻤 ᖺᗘ㻌 㻝㻥 ᖺᗘ㻌 㻞㻜 ᖺᗘ㻌 㻞㻝 ᖺᗘ㻌 㻞㻞 ᖺᗘ㻌 㻌 䐟㻌 㻞㻌 㻝㻟㻌 㻞㻤㻌 㻠㻢㻌 㻢㻝㻌 㻢㻤㻌 㻌 䐠㻌 㻝㻌 㻥㻌 㻝㻣㻌 㻟㻞㻌 㻠㻜㻌 㻡㻤㻌 㻌 䐡㻌 㻝㻌 㻝㻝㻌 㻞㻟㻌 㻟㻟㻌 㻠㻜㻌 㻡㻝㻌 㻌 䐢㻌 㻟㻌 㻝㻡㻌 㻟㻞㻌 㻠㻣㻌 㻢㻥㻌 㻌 䐣㻌 㻞㻌 㻥㻌 㻝㻠㻌 㻟㻣㻌 㻠㻜㻌 㻣㻡㻌 㻠㻟㻌 㻌 䐤㻌 㻜㻌 㻜㻌 㻜㻌 㻜㻌 㻜㻌 㻌 䐥㻌 㻝㻌 㻜㻌 㻞㻌 㻞㻌 㻜㻌 㻜㻌 㻝㻌 39 㻤㻠㻚㻡㻑㻌 㻢㻜㻚㻥㻑㻌 㻢㻝㻚㻢㻑㻌 㻥㻟㻚㻠㻑㻌 㻡㻢㻚㻞㻑㻌 㻜㻚㻜㻑㻌 㻞㻚㻟㻑㻌 ϭϬϬ͘Ϭй ϴϬ͘Ϭй ϲϬ͘Ϭй ϰϬ͘Ϭй ϮϬ͘Ϭй ϭϳᖺᗘ ϭϴᖺᗘ ϭϵᖺᗘ ϮϬᖺᗘ Ϯϭᖺᗘ ϮϮᖺᗘ 䐟 ϱϬ͘Ϭй ϴϲ͘ϳй ϳϱ͘ϳй ϴϲ͘ϴй ϴϴ͘ϰй ϴϱ͘Ϭй 䐠 Ϯϱ͘Ϭй ϲϬ͘Ϭй ϰϱ͘ϵй ϲϬ͘ϰй ϱϴ͘Ϭй ϳϮ͘ϱй 䐡 Ϯϱ͘Ϭй ϳϯ͘ϯй ϲϮ͘Ϯй ϲϮ͘ϯй ϱϴ͘Ϭй ϲϯ͘ϴй 䐢 ϳϱ͘Ϭй ϭϬϬ͘Ϭй ϴϲ͘ϱй ϴϴ͘ϳй ϭϬϬ͘Ϭй ϵϯ͘ϴй 䐣 ϱϬ͘Ϭй ϲϬ͘Ϭй ϯϳ͘ϴй ϲϵ͘ϴй ϱϴ͘Ϭй ϱϯ͘ϴй 㸦 㸧ෆࡣᅇ⟅Ꮫᩘ 㻌 㻝㻣㻙㻞㻜 ᖺᗘ㻔㻝㻜㻥㻕㻌 㻌 㻌 ᅇ⟅ᩘ㻌 㻞㻝㻘㻞㻞 ᖺᗘ䠄㻝㻠㻥䠅㻌 ᅇ⟅ẚ㻌 ᅇ⟅ᩘ㻌 ᅇ⟅ẚ㻌 㻌 䐟㻌 㻤㻥㻌 㻤㻝㻚㻣㻑㻌 㻝㻞㻥㻌 㻤㻢㻚㻢㻑㻌 㻌 䐠㻌 㻡㻥㻌 㻡㻠㻚㻝㻑㻌 㻥㻤㻌 㻢㻡㻚㻤㻑㻌 㻌 䐡㻌 㻢㻤㻌 㻢㻞㻚㻠㻑㻌 㻥㻝㻌 㻢㻝㻚㻝㻑㻌 㻌 䐢㻌 㻥㻣㻌 㻤㻥㻚㻜㻑㻌 㻝㻠㻠㻌 㻥㻢㻚㻢㻑㻌 㻌 䐣㻌 㻢㻞㻌 㻡㻢㻚㻥㻑㻌 㻤㻟㻌 㻡㻡㻚㻣㻑㻌 㻌 䐤㻌 㻜㻌 㻜㻚㻜㻑㻌 㻜㻌 㻜㻚㻜㻑㻌 㻌 䐥㻌 㻡㻌 㻠㻚㻢㻑㻌 㻝㻌 㻜㻚㻣㻑㻌 㸦ྛᅇ⟅ࡢྜィࢆ 100%ࡋࡓሙྜࡢᖺᗘูࡢྜ㸧 䐟 ϰϬ͘ϴй ϭϳͲϮϬᖺᗘ ϱϵ͘Ϯй Ϯϭ͕ϮϮᖺᗘ 䐠 ϯϳ͘ϲй ϲϮ͘ϰй 䐡 ϰϮ͘ϴй ϱϳ͘Ϯй 䐢 ϰϬ͘Ϯй ϱϵ͘ϴй 䐣 ϰϮ͘ϴй ϱϳ͘Ϯй 䐥 ϴϯ͘ϯй Ϭй ϮϬй ϰϬй ϭϲ͘ϳй ϲϬй ϴϬй ϭϬϬй 40 タၥ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯ࡣఱᖺࡈᐇࡍࡿỴᐃࡋ࡚࠸ࡲࡍࠋ ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯ࢆఱᖺࡈᐇࡍࡿỴᐃࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࡘ࠸࡚ࠊࠕỴࡲࡗ࡚࠸ࡿࠖ ᅇ⟅ࡋࡓᏛࡣ 258 ᰯ୰ 168 ᰯ(65.2%)࡛࠶ࡾࠊࡑࡢ࠺ࡕࠊẖᖺᐇࡍࡿᏛࡀ 100 ᰯ (38.8%)ࠊᩘᖺࡈᐇࡍࡿᏛࡀ 68 ᰯ(26.4%)࡛࠶ࡗࡓࠋࠕỴࡲࡗ࡚࠸࡞࠸ࠖᅇ⟅ࡋ ࡓᏛࡣ 83 ᰯ(32.2%)࡛࠶ࡗࡓࠋ 㻌 䐟Ỵ䜎䛳䛶䛔䛺䛔㻌 㻌 䐠Ỵ䜎䛳䛶䛔䜛䠄ẖᖺ䠅㻌 㻌 䐡Ỵ䜎䛳䛶䛔䜛䠄ᩘᖺ䛤䛸䠅㻌 㻤㻟㻌 㻟㻞㻚㻞㻑㻌 㻝㻜㻜㻌 㻟㻤㻚㻤㻑㻌 㻢㻤㻌 㻞㻢㻚㻠㻑㻌 㻣㻌 㻞㻚㻣㻑㻌 㻌 䐢↓ᅇ⟅㻌 㸦ཷᑂᖺᗘูෆヂ㸧 㸦 㸧ෆࡣᅇ⟅Ꮫᩘ 㻌 䐟㻌 ᅇ⟅ẚ㻌 䐠㻌 ᅇ⟅ẚ㻌 䐡㻌 ᅇ⟅ẚ㻌 䐢㻌 ᅇ⟅ẚ㻌 㻌 㻝㻣 ᖺᗘ㻔㻠㻕㻌 㻞㻌 㻡㻜㻚㻜㻑㻌 㻝㻌 㻞㻡㻚㻜㻑㻌 㻜㻌 㻜㻚㻜㻑㻌 㻝㻌 㻞㻡㻚㻜㻑㻌 㻌 㻝㻤 ᖺᗘ㻔㻝㻡㻕㻌 㻠㻌 㻞㻡㻚㻜㻑㻌 㻤㻌 㻡㻜㻚㻜㻑㻌 㻟㻌 㻝㻤㻚㻤㻑㻌 㻜㻌 㻜㻚㻜㻑㻌 㻌 㻝㻥 ᖺᗘ㻔㻟㻣㻕㻌 㻝㻟㻌 㻟㻠㻚㻞㻑㻌 㻤㻌 㻞㻝㻚㻝㻑㻌 㻝㻠㻌 㻟㻢㻚㻤㻑㻌 㻞㻌 㻡㻚㻟㻑㻌 㻌 㻞㻜 ᖺᗘ㻔㻡㻟㻕㻌 㻝㻢㻌 㻞㻣㻚㻢㻑㻌 㻞㻞㻌 㻟㻣㻚㻥㻑㻌 㻝㻞㻌 㻞㻜㻚㻣㻑㻌 㻟㻌 㻡㻚㻞㻑㻌 㻌 㻞㻝 ᖺᗘ㻔㻢㻥㻕㻌 㻞㻣㻌 㻟㻤㻚㻜㻑㻌 㻞㻡㻌 㻟㻡㻚㻞㻑㻌 㻝㻣㻌 㻞㻟㻚㻥㻑㻌 㻜㻌 㻜㻚㻜㻑㻌 㻌 㻞㻞 ᖺᗘ㻔㻤㻜㻕㻌 㻞㻝㻌 㻞㻠㻚㻣㻑㻌 㻟㻢㻌 㻠㻞㻚㻠㻑㻌 㻞㻞㻌 㻞㻡㻚㻥㻑㻌 㻝㻌 㻝㻚㻞㻑㻌 ϭϳᖺᗘ Ϯϭ ϭ 䐟Ỵ䜎䛳䛶䛔䛺䛔 䐠Ỵ䜎䛳䛶䛔䜛䠄ẖᖺ䠅 ϭϴᖺᗘ ϰ ϴ ϯ 䐡Ỵ䜎䛳䛶䛔䜛䠄ᩘᖺ䛤䛸䠅 䐢↓ᅇ⟅ ϭϵᖺᗘ ϭϯ ϮϬᖺᗘ ϴ ϭϰ ϮϮ ϭϲ Ϯϭᖺᗘ ϯ ϭϳ ϯϲ Ϯϭ Ϭ ϭϮ Ϯϱ Ϯϳ ϮϮᖺᗘ Ϯ ϮϬ ϮϮ ϰϬ ϲϬ 41 ϭ ϴϬ タၥタၥ࡛ࠕճࠖᅇ⟅䛧䛯ሙྜ䛿䚸⮬ᕫⅬ᳨䞉ホ౯䛿ఱᖺ䛤䛸䛻ᐇ䛧䛶䛔䜛䛛ᩍ 䛘䛶䛟䛰䛥䛔䚹 タၥ(27)࡛ࠕᩘᖺࡈᐇࡍࡿࡇࡀỴࡲࡗ࡚࠸ࡿࠖᅇ⟅ࡋࡓᏛࡀࠊ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ ౯ࡣఱᖺࡈᐇࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࡘ࠸࡚ࠊࠕ2 ᖺࡈࠖᅇ⟅ࡋࡓᏛࡀ 68 Ꮫ୰ 20 ᰯ (29.4%)ࠊࠕ3 ᖺࡈࠖࡀ 16 ᰯ(23.5%)ࠊࠕ4 ᖺࡈࠖࡀ 10 ᰯ(14.7%)ࠊࠕ5 ᖺࡈࠖࡀ 8 ᰯ(11.8%)⥆࠸ࡓࠋ 㻌 䐟㻝䡠㻞 ᖺ䛤䛸㻌 㻝㻌 㻝㻚㻡㻑㻌 㻞㻜㻌 㻞㻥㻚㻠㻑㻌 㻞㻌 㻞㻚㻥㻑㻌 㻝㻢㻌 㻞㻟㻚㻡㻑㻌 㻞㻌 㻞㻚㻥㻑㻌 㻌 䐤㻠 ᖺ䛤䛸㻌 㻝㻜㻌 㻝㻠㻚㻣㻑㻌 㻌 䐥㻡 ᖺ䛤䛸㻌 㻤㻌 㻝㻝㻚㻤㻑㻌 㻌 䐦㻟䡚㻡 ᖺ䛤䛸㻌 㻞㻌 㻞㻚㻥㻑㻌 㻌 䐧㻢 ᖺ䛤䛸㻌 㻝㻌 㻝㻚㻡㻑㻌 㻌 䐨㻣 ᖺ䛤䛸㻌 㻡㻌 㻣㻚㻠㻑㻌 㻌 䐩↓ᅇ⟅㻌 㻝㻌 㻝㻚㻡㻑㻌 㻌 䐠㻞 ᖺ䛤䛸㻌 㻌 䐡㻞䡠㻟 ᖺ䛤䛸㻌 㻌 䐢㻟 ᖺ䛤䛸㻌 㻌 䐣㻟䡠㻠 ᖺ䛤䛸㻌 ϭϬϬ ϭϬϬ ϴϯ ϴϬ ϲϬ ϰϬ ϮϬ ϮϬ ϭϲ ϭϬ ϴ ϭ ϴ ϱ ϳ Ϭ ẖᖺ Ϯᖺ䛤䛸 ϯᖺ䛤䛸 ϰᖺ䛤䛸 ϱᖺ䛤䛸 ϲᖺ䛤䛸 ϳᖺ䛤䛸 䛭䛾 ᮍỴᐃ ↓ᅇ⟅ タၥㄆドホ౯ࡣఱᖺࡈཷᑂࡍࡿỴᐃࡋ࡚࠸ࡲࡍࠋ ㄆドホ౯ࢆఱᖺࡈཷᑂࡍࡿỴᐃࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࡘ࠸࡚ࠊࠕỴࡲࡗ࡚࠸ࡿࠖᅇ⟅ࡋ ࡓᏛࡣ 258 ᰯ୰ 112 ᰯ(43.4%)࡛࠶ࡗࡓࠋࠕỴࡲࡗ࡚࠸࡞࠸ࠖᅇ⟅ࡋࡓᏛࡣ 132 ᰯ (51.2%)࡛࠶ࡗࡓࠋ ᖺᗘࡈ࡛ࡣࠊཷᑂᚋࡢ᪥ࡀὸ࠸ࠕỴࡲࡗ࡚࠸࡞࠸ࠖࡢᏛࡢྜࡀከࡃ࡞ࡗ࡚࠸ ࡿࠋ 42 㻌 䐟Ỵ䜎䛳䛶䛔䛺䛔㻌 㻝㻟㻞㻌 㻡㻝㻚㻞㻑㻌 㻌 䐠Ỵ䜎䛳䛶䛔䜛㻌 㻝㻝㻞㻌 㻠㻟㻚㻠㻑㻌 㻝㻠㻌 㻡㻚㻠㻑㻌 㻌 䐡↓ᅇ⟅㻌 㸦ཷᑂᖺᗘูෆヂ㸧 㸦 㸧ෆࡣᅇ⟅Ꮫᩘ 㻌 䐟㻌 ᅇ⟅ẚ㻌 䐠㻌 ᅇ⟅ẚ㻌 䐡㻌 ᅇ⟅ẚ㻌 㻌 㻝㻣 ᖺᗘ㻔㻠㻕㻌 㻝㻌 㻞㻡㻚㻜㻑㻌 㻞㻌 㻡㻜㻚㻜㻑㻌 㻝㻌 㻞㻡㻚㻜㻑㻌 㻌 㻝㻤 ᖺᗘ㻔㻝㻡㻕㻌 㻡㻌 㻟㻝㻚㻟㻑㻌 㻥㻌 㻡㻢㻚㻟㻑㻌 㻝㻌 㻢㻚㻟㻑㻌 㻌 㻝㻥 ᖺᗘ㻔㻟㻣㻕㻌 㻝㻞㻌 㻟㻝㻚㻢㻑㻌 㻞㻞㻌 㻡㻣㻚㻥㻑㻌 㻟㻌 㻣㻚㻥㻑㻌 㻌 㻞㻜 ᖺᗘ㻔㻡㻟㻕㻌 㻞㻡㻌 㻠㻟㻚㻝㻑㻌 㻞㻟㻌 㻟㻥㻚㻣㻑㻌 㻡㻌 㻤㻚㻢㻑㻌 㻌 㻞㻝 ᖺᗘ㻔㻢㻥㻕㻌 㻟㻥㻌 㻡㻠㻚㻥㻑㻌 㻟㻜㻌 㻠㻞㻚㻟㻑㻌 㻜㻌 㻜㻚㻜㻑㻌 㻌 㻞㻞 ᖺᗘ㻔㻤㻜㻕㻌 㻡㻜㻌 㻡㻤㻚㻤㻑㻌 㻞㻢㻌 㻟㻜㻚㻢㻑㻌 㻠㻌 㻠㻚㻣㻑㻌 ϭϳᖺᗘ ϭ Ϯ ϭ 䐟Ỵ䜎䛳䛶䛔䛺䛔 䐠Ỵ䜎䛳䛶䛔䜛 ϭϴᖺᗘ ϱ ϭϵᖺᗘ ϵ ϭ 䐡↓ᅇ⟅ ϭϮ ϮϬᖺᗘ ϮϮ ϱ Ϯϯ Ϯϱ Ϯϭᖺᗘ ϯ ϯϬ ϯϵ ϮϮᖺᗘ Ϯϲ ϱϬ Ϭ ϮϬ ϰϬ ϲϬ 43 ϰ ϴϬ タၥタၥ࡛ࠕղࠖᅇ⟅䛧䛯ሙྜ䛿䚸ㄆドホ౯䜢ఱᖺ䛤䛸䛻ཷᑂ䛩䜛ணᐃ䛛ᩍ䛘䛶䛟 䛰䛥䛔䚹 タၥ(29)࡛ㄆドホ౯ࢆఱᖺࡈཷᑂࡍࡿỴᐃࡋ࡚࠸ࡿᅇ⟅ࡋࡓᏛࡀࠊఱᖺࡈ ཷᑂࡍࡿணᐃࡘ࠸࡚ࠊࠕ7 ᖺࡈࠖᅇ⟅ࡋࡓᏛࡀ 112 Ꮫ୰ 98 ᰯ(87.5%)ࠊࠕ6 ᖺࡈࠖࡀ 6 ᰯ(5.4%)ࠊࠕ5 ᖺࡈࠖࡀ 1 ᰯ(0.9%)ࠊࠕࡑࡢࠖࡀ 7 ᰯ(6.3%)⥆࠸ࡓࠋ ࡞࠾ࠊࠕࡑࡢࠖࡣࠊࠕ6㹼7 ᖺࡈࠖ࠸࠺ពぢࡀ࠶ࡗࡓࠋ ϵϴ ϭϬϬ ϴϬ ϲϬ ϰϬ ϮϬ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ ϭ ẖᖺ Ϯᖺ䛤䛸 ϯᖺ䛤䛸 ϰᖺ䛤䛸 ϱᖺ䛤䛸 ϳ ϲ Ϭ ϲᖺ䛤䛸 ϳᖺ䛤䛸 䛭䛾 タၥ᪥ᖖⓗ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯ࢆᐇࡍࡿ⤌⧊࣭㒊⨫ࡣ࠶ࡾࡲࡍࠋ ᪥ᖖⓗ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯ࢆᐇࡍࡿ⤌⧊࣭㒊⨫ࡀ࠶ࡿࡘ࠸࡚ࠊࠕ࠶ࡿࠖᅇ⟅ࡋࡓ Ꮫࡣ 258 ᰯ୰ 239 ᰯ(92.7%)ࠊࠕ≉࡞࠸ࠖᅇ⟅ࡋࡓᏛࡣ 13 ᰯ(5.0%)࡛࠶ࡗࡓࠋ ⤌⧊ࡸ㒊⨫ࡢලయⓗ࡞ྡ⛠ࡘ࠸࡚ࡣࠊࠕ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯ጤဨ࡞⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯ࢆ ࡓࡿ┠ⓗࡋ࡚࠸ࡿጤဨࠖᅇ⟅ࡋࡓᏛࡀ 239 ᰯ୰ 193 ᰯ(80.8%)ࠊࠕ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ ホ౯ጤဨࡑࡢࡢ」ᩘࡢጤဨࡢྜྠ࡛ࡢᐇࠖᅇ⟅ࡋࡓᏛࡀ 29 ᰯ(12.1%)ࠊ ࠕᩍ ⫱ᨵၿጤဨ࡞ࡑࡢࡢጤဨࠖᅇ⟅ࡋࡓᏛࡀ 8 ᰯ(3.3%)ࠊࠕᏛ㛗ᐊࡸᏛᩍ⫱㛤 Ⓨࢭࣥࢱ࣮࡞ࡢ㒊⨫ࠖᅇ⟅ࡋࡓᏛࡀ 6 ᰯ(2.5%)ࠊࠕFD 㛵㐃ࡢጤဨࠖᅇ⟅ࡋࡓ Ꮫࡀ 3 ᰯ(1.3%)࡛࠶ࡗࡓࠋ ࠕᏛ㛗ᐊࡸᏛᩍ⫱㛤Ⓨࢭࣥࢱ࣮࡞ࡢ㒊⨫ࠖࡘ࠸࡚ࡣࠊࠕⅬ᳨ホ౯ᐊࠖࠕᏛ㛗ᐊࠖ ࠕᏛᩍ⫱㛤Ⓨࢭࣥࢱ࣮ࠖࠕᩍ⫱㛤Ⓨ᥎㐍ࢭࣥࢱ࣮ࠖ࡞ࡀ࠶ࡾࠊࡑࢀࡒࢀࡢᏛ࠾ࡅ ࡿࡑࡢ㒊⨫ࡢᙺࡸᵓᡂဨ࡞ࡘ࠸࡚☜ㄆࢆࡋࡓ࠸ࠋ 㻌 䛒䜛㻌 㻌 ≉䛻䛺䛔㻌 㻌 ↓ᅇ⟅㻌 㻞㻟㻥㻌 㻥㻞㻚㻣㻑㻌 㻝㻟㻌 㻡㻚㻜㻑㻌 㻢㻌 㻞㻚㻟㻑㻌 44 㸸ۑۑጤဨࠊەەホ౯ᐊ࡞ 㻌 ᅇ⟅ᩘ㻌 㻌 ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨䞉ホ౯ጤဨ䛺䛹䚸⮬ᕫⅬ᳨䞉ホ౯䜢⾜䛖ጤဨ㻌 㻝㻥㻟㻌 㻤㻜㻚㻤㻑㻌 㻞㻥㻌 㻝㻞㻚㻝㻑㻌 㻌 㻲㻰 㛵㐃䛾ጤဨ㻌 㻟㻌 㻝㻚㻟㻑㻌 㻌 ᩍ⫱ᨵၿጤဨ䛺䛹䛭䛾䛾ጤဨ㻌 㻤㻌 㻟㻚㻟㻑㻌 㻌 Ꮫ㛗ᐊ䜔Ꮫᩍ⫱㛤Ⓨ䝉䞁䝍䞊䛺䛹䛾㒊⨫㻌 㻢㻌 㻞㻚㻡㻑㻌 㻌 ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨䞉ホ౯ጤဨ䛸䛭䛾」ᩘ䛾ጤဨ㻌 ᅇ⟅ẚ㻌 タၥᏛෆ࠾ࡅࡿ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯ࡢ୰ᚰே≀ࡣ࡞ࡓ࡛ࡍࠋ Ꮫෆ࠾ࡅࡿ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯ࡢ୰ᚰே≀ࡘ࠸࡚ࠊࠕ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯ࢆ⾜࠺ጤဨࡢ㛗ࠖ ᅇ⟅ࡋࡓᏛࡀ ᰯ୰ ᰯࠊࠕᏛ㛗ࠖᅇ⟅ࡋࡓᏛࡀ ᰯࠊࠕ⮬ ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯ࢆྲྀࡾࡲࡵࡿ㒊⨫ࡢ㛗ࠖᅇ⟅ࡋࡓᏛࡀ ᰯࠊࠕᏛ㒊㛗ࠖᅇ ⟅ࡋࡓᏛࡀ ᰯࠊࠕົᒁ㛗ࠖᅇ⟅ࡋࡓᏛࡀ ᰯ࡛࠶ࡾࠊࠕࡑࡢࠖ ᅇ⟅ࡋࡓᏛࡀ ᰯ࡛࠶ࡗࡓࠋ ࡞࠾ࠊࠕࡑࡢࠖᅇ⟅ࡋࡓᏛࡢពぢࡣࠊࠕᏛ㛗ࠖࠕᏛ㛗⿵బ㸦ᖖົ⌮㸧ࠖࠕ⮬ ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯ࢆ⾜࠺ጤဨࡢ㛗ྲྀࡾࡲࡵࡿ㒊⨫ࡢ㛗ࠖࠕ⮬ᕫホ౯ᢸᙜ⪅ࠖ࡞ࡢពぢ ࡀ࠶ࡗࡓࠋ 㻌 ᅇ⟅ᩘ㻌 㻌 䐟Ꮫ㛗㻌 㻥㻡㻌 㻌 䐠ົᒁ㛗㻌 㻣㻌 㻌 䐡Ꮫ㒊㛗㻌 㻝㻜㻌 㻌 䐢⮬ᕫⅬ᳨䞉ホ౯䜢⾜䛖ጤဨ䛾㛗㻌 㻝㻝㻢㻌 㻌 䐣⮬ᕫⅬ᳨䞉ホ౯䜢ྲྀ䜚䜎䛸䜑䜛㒊⨫䛾㛗㻌 㻝㻟㻌 㻌 䐤䛭䛾㻌 㻝㻜㻌 㻌 䐥↓ᅇ⟅㻌 㻣㻌 յ ϱ͘Ϭй ն շ ϯ͘ϵй Ϯ͘ϳй ձ ϯϲ͘ϴй մ ϰϱ͘Ϭй ղ ճ Ϯ͘ϳй ϯ͘ϵй ࡞ពぢࡣ௨ୗࡢ㏻ࡾࠋ ࣭Ꮫ㛗 ࣭Ꮫ㛗⿵బ㸦ᖖົ⌮㸧 ࣭⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯ࢆ⾜࠺ጤဨࡢ㛗ྲྀࡾࡲࡵࡿ㒊⨫ࡢ㛗 45 ᅇ⟅ẚ㻌 㻟㻢㻚㻤㻑㻌 㻞㻚㻣㻑㻌 㻟㻚㻥㻑㻌 㻠㻡㻚㻜㻑㻌 㻡㻚㻜㻑㻌 㻟㻚㻥㻑㻌 㻞㻚㻣㻑㻌 ࣭⮬ᕫホ౯ᢸᙜ⪅ タၥ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯ࡢࡓࡵࡢᇶ‽ࡸ㡯┠ࢆタᐃࡍࡿ࠶ࡓࡾࠊཧ⪃ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࡶ ࡢࡣ࠶ࡾࡲࡍࠋ ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯ࡢࡓࡵࡢᇶ‽ࡸ㡯┠ࢆタᐃࡍࡿ࠶ࡓࡾࠊཧ⪃ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࡶࡢࡀ࠶ࡿ ࡘ࠸࡚ࠊࠕ᪥ᮏ㧗➼ᩍ⫱ホ౯ᶵᵓࡢᇶ‽ࢆཧ⪃ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋࠖᅇ⟅ࡋࡓᏛࡀ 245 ᰯ (95.0%)ࠊࠕᏛࡢሗ࿌᭩ࢆཧ⪃ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋࠖࡀ 75 ᰯ(29.1%)ࠊࠕᏛᇶ‽༠ࡢⅬ᳨࣭ ホ౯㡯┠ࢆཧ⪃ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋࠖࡀ 30 ᰯ(11.6%)ࠊࠕᏛホ౯࣭Ꮫᤵᶵᵓࡢᇶ‽ࢆཧ⪃ ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋࠖࡀ 7 ᰯ(2.7%)ࠊࠕཧ⪃ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࡶࡢࡣ≉࡞࠸ࠋࠖࡀ 5 ᰯ(1.9%)࡛࠶ࡾࠊ ࠕࡑࡢࠖᅇ⟅ࡋࡓᏛࡀ 6 ᰯ(2.3%)࡛࠶ࡗࡓࠋ 」ᩘ㑅ᢥࡀྍ⬟࡞タၥ࡛࠶ࡗࡓࡀࠊ ࠕᏛᇶ‽༠ࡢⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯㡯┠ࢆཧ⪃ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋࠖ ᅇ⟅ࡋࡓ 30 ᰯࡣ࡚ࠕ᪥ᮏ㧗➼ᩍ⫱ホ౯ᶵᵓࡢᇶ‽ࢆཧ⪃ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋࠖࡶ㑅ᢥࡋ࡚ ࠸ࡓࠋࡲࡓࠊࠕᏛホ౯࣭Ꮫᤵᶵᵓࡢᇶ‽ࢆཧ⪃ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋࠖᅇ⟅ࡋࡓ 7 ᰯࡣ ࡚ࠕ᪥ᮏ㧗➼ᩍ⫱ホ౯ᶵᵓࠖࠕᏛᇶ‽༠ࠖࡶ㑅ᢥࡋ࡚࠾ࡾࠊ」ᩘࡢᅋయࡢᇶ‽ࡸホ౯ 㡯┠ࢆẚ㍑ࡋ࡞ࡀࡽࡑࢀࡒࢀࡢᏛྜ࠺⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯㡯┠ࢆ᳨ウࡋ࡚࠸ࡿᵝᏊࡀ࠺ ࡀ࠼ࡿࠋ ࡞࠾ࠊࠕࡑࡢࠖᅇ⟅ࡋࡓᏛࡢពぢࡣࠊࠕ▷ᮇᏛᇶ‽༠ࡢᇶ‽ࠖࠕJABEE 㸦᪥ᮏᢏ⾡⪅ᩍ⫱ㄆᐃᶵᵓ㸧ࡢᇶ‽ࠖࠕ⸆Ꮫᩍ⫱ホ౯ᶵᵓࡢᇶ‽ࠖࠕᅜ㝿ㄆドホ౯ᶵ㛵 AACSB㸦⡿ᅜ㸧ࡢホ౯ᇶ‽ࠖࠕᩥ㒊⛉Ꮫ┬୰ኸᩍ⫱ᑂ㆟⟅⏦ࠖ࡞ࡢពぢࡀ࠶ࡗࡓࠋ 㻌 ᅇ⟅ᩘ㻌 ᅇ⟅ẚ㻌 㻌 䐟᪥ᮏ㧗➼ᩍ⫱ホ౯ᶵᵓ䛾ᇶ‽䜢ཧ⪃䛻䛧䛶䛔䜛䚹㻌 㻞㻠㻡㻌 㻥㻡㻚㻜㻑㻌 㻌 䐠Ꮫᇶ‽༠䛾Ⅼ᳨䞉ホ౯㡯┠䜢ཧ⪃䛻䛧䛶䛔䜛䚹㻌 㻟㻜㻌 㻝㻝㻚㻢㻑㻌 㻌 䐡Ꮫホ౯䞉Ꮫᤵᶵᵓ䛾ᇶ‽䜢ཧ⪃䛻䛧䛶䛔䜛䚹㻌 㻣㻌 㻞㻚㻣㻑㻌 㻣㻡㻌 㻞㻥㻚㻝㻑㻌 㻌 䐣ཧ⪃䛻䛧䛶䛔䜛䜒䛾䛿≉䛻䛺䛔䚹㻌 㻡㻌 㻝㻚㻥㻑㻌 㻌 䐤䛭䛾㻌 㻢㻌 㻞㻚㻟㻑㻌 㻌 䐥↓ᅇ⟅㻌 㻡㻌 㻝㻚㻥㻑㻌 㻌 䐢Ꮫ䛾ሗ࿌᭩䜢ཧ⪃䛻䛧䛶䛔䜛䚹㻌 ϮϱϬ Ϯϰϱ ϮϬϬ ϭϱϬ ϭϬϬ ϳϱ ϯϬ ϱϬ ϳ ϱ ϲ ϱ 䐣 䐤 䐥 Ϭ 䐟 䐠 䐡 䐢 ࡞ពぢࡣ௨ୗࡢ㏻ࡾࠋ ࣭⸆Ꮫᩍ⫱ホ౯ᶵᵓࡢᇶ‽ ࣭ᩥ㒊⛉Ꮫ┬୰ኸᩍ⫱ᑂ㆟⟅⏦ 46 ࣭᪥ᮏᏛ⾡㆟ᩍ㣴ᩍ⫱ཧ↷ᇶ‽ᅇ⟅ ࣭ᅜ㝿ㄆドホ౯ᶵ㛵 AACSB㸦⡿ᅜ㸧ࡢホ౯ᇶ‽ ࣭JABEE㸦᪥ᮏᢏ⾡⪅ᩍ⫱ㄆᐃᶵᵓ㸧ࡢᇶ‽ ࣭᪥ᮏ⤒Ⴀရ㉁㈹ ࣭▷ᮇᏛᇶ‽༠ࡢᇶ‽ タၥ᪥ᮏ㧗➼ᩍ⫱ホ౯ᶵᵓࡀᖹᡂ ᖺᗘࡽᐇࡍࡿㄆドホ౯ࡢ᪂ࡋ࠸ᇶ‽ࢆ ࡈᏑ▱࡛ࡍࠋ ホ౯ᶵᵓࡀᖹᡂ 24 ᖺᗘࡽᐇࡍࡿㄆドホ౯ࡢ᪂ࡋ࠸ᇶ‽ࢆ▱ࡗ࡚࠸ࡿࡘ࠸࡚ࠊ ࠕ▱ࡽ࡞࠸ࠋࠖᅇ⟅ࡋࡓᏛࡣ 258 ᰯ୰ 18 ᰯ(7.0%)࡛࠶ࡗࡓࠋ᪂ࡋ࠸ᇶ‽ࡘ࠸࡚ࡢ ᳨ウ≧ἣࡘ࠸࡚ึࡵ࡚࠾▱ࡽࡏࡋࡓࡢࡣࠊホ౯ᶵᵓദࠕᖹᡂ 22 ᖺᗘ ホ౯ᐇ༠㆟ ࡛ࠖ࠶ࡿࡀࠊࡑࡢ 18 ᰯࠕ↓ᅇ⟅ࠖࡢ 6 ᰯࢆ㝖࠸ࡓ 234 ᰯ(90.7%)ࡀఱࡽࡢᙧ࡛᪂ࡋ ࠸ᇶ‽ࢆ▱ࡗ࡚࠸ࡓࡇ࡞ࡿࠋ ᪂ࡋ࠸ᇶ‽ࢆ▱ࡗࡓᡭẁࡋ࡚ࡣࠊࠕ᪥ᮏ㧗➼ᩍ⫱ホ౯ᶵᵓദࡢࢭ࣑ࢼ࣮࡛▱ࡗࡓࠋࠖ ᅇ⟅ࡋࡓᏛࡀ 258 ᰯ୰ 153 ᰯ(59.3%)ࠊࠕ᪥ᮏ㧗➼ᩍ⫱ホ౯ᶵᵓࡢ࣮࣒࣮࣍࣌ࢪ࡛▱ ࡗࡓࠋࠖࡀ 148 ᰯ(57.4%)ࠊࠕ᪥ᮏ㧗➼ᩍ⫱ホ౯ᶵᵓࡢᶵ㛵ㄅࠕPeeR࡛ࠖ▱ࡗࡓࠋࠖࡀ 82 ᰯ(31.8%)ࠊࠕࡑࡢࠖࡀ 3 ᰯ(1.2%)࡛࠶ࡗࡓࠋ ࡞࠾ࠊࠕࡑࡢࠖᅇ⟅ࡋࡓᏛࡢពぢࡣࠊᖹᡂ 24(2012)ᖺ 1 ᭶ 4 ሙ࡛㛤ദࡋࡓ ࠕ᪂ホ౯ࢩࢫࢸ࣒ㄝ᫂ࡢෆࡀᒆ࠸࡚▱ࡗࡓࠋࠖ࡞ࡢពぢࡀ࠶ࡗࡓࠋ 㻌 ᅇ⟅ᩘ㻌 㻌 䐟▱䜙䛺䛔䚹㻌 ᅇ⟅ẚ㻌 㻝㻤㻌 㻣㻚㻜㻑㻌 㻌 䐠᪥ᮏ㧗➼ᩍ⫱ホ౯ᶵᵓദ䛾䝉䝭䝘䞊䛷▱䛳䛯䚹㻌 㻝㻡㻟㻌 㻡㻥㻚㻟㻑㻌 㻌 䐡᪥ᮏ㧗➼ᩍ⫱ホ౯ᶵᵓ䛾䝩䞊䝮䝨䞊䝆䛷▱䛳䛯䚹㻌 㻝㻠㻤㻌 㻡㻣㻚㻠㻑㻌 㻌 䐢᪥ᮏ㧗➼ᩍ⫱ホ౯ᶵᵓ䛾ᶵ㛵ㄅ䛂㻼㼑㼑㻾䛃䛷▱䛳䛯䚹㻌 㻤㻞㻌 㻟㻝㻚㻤㻑㻌 㻌 䐣䛭䛾㻌 㻟㻌 㻝㻚㻞㻑㻌 㻌 䐤↓ᅇ⟅㻌 㻢㻌 㻞㻚㻟㻑㻌 ϭϱϯ ϭϲϬ ϭϰϴ ϭϰϬ ϭϮϬ ϭϬϬ ϴϮ ϴϬ ϲϬ ϰϬ ϮϬ ϭϴ ϯ ϲ 䐣 䐤 Ϭ 䐟 䐠 䐡 䐢 ࡞ពぢࡣ௨ୗࡢ㏻ࡾࠋ ࣭᪂ࢩࢫࢸ࣒ㄝ᫂ࡢෆࡀᒆ࠸࡚▱ࡗࡓࠋ ࣭ᖹᡂ 24 ᖺᗘཷᑂࡍࡿࡓࡵࠋ 47 タၥタၥ࡛ࠕղࠖ㹼ࠕմࠖᅇ⟅ࡋࡓሙྜࠊ᪥ᮏ㧗➼ᩍ⫱ホ౯ᶵᵓࡀᖹᡂ ᖺᗘࡽᐇࡍࡿㄆドホ౯ࡢ᪂ࡋ࠸ᇶ‽ᑐࡋ࡚Ꮫෆ࡛ఱྲྀ⤌ࡳࢆࡋ࡚࠸ࡲࡍࠋ タၥ(36)࡛ㄆドホ౯ࡢ᪂ࡋ࠸ᇶ‽ࢆࢭ࣑ࢼ࣮ࠊ࣮࣒࣮࣍࣌ࢪཬࡧᶵ㛵ㄅࠕPeeR࡛ࠖ▱ࡗ ࡓᅇ⟅ࡋࡓᏛࡣ 258 ᰯ୰ 231 ᰯ(89.5%)࡛࠶ࡗࡓࡀࠊࡑࢀࡽࡢᏛࡀ᪂ࡋ࠸ᇶ‽ᑐ ࡋ࡚Ꮫෆ࡛ఱྲྀ⤌ࡳࢆࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࡘ࠸࡚ࠊࠕ࣮࣒࣮࣍࣌ࢪࡸࢭ࣑ࢼ࣮ࡢཧຍ࡞ࡼ ࡾ㛵㐃ሗࢆ㞟ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋࠖࡀ 150 ᰯ(64.9%)ࠊࠕᏛ⊂⮬ࡢ⮬ᕫ࣭Ⅼ᳨ホ౯㡯┠ࡢぢ ┤ࡋࡸᏛ⊂⮬ࡢ≉Ⰽ࠶ࡿᇶ‽ࢆ᳨ウࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋࠖࡀ 73 ᰯ(31.4%)ࠊࠕ㞟ࡋࡓሗࢆሗ ࿌ࡸຮᙉࡢᐇࡼࡾඹ᭷ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋࠖࡀ 59 ᰯ(25.5%)ࠊࠕ᪥ᮏ㧗➼ᩍ⫱ホ౯ᶵᵓ ࡢᇶ‽ࢆ㋃ࡲ࠼ࡓ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯ࡢᐇࢆࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋࠖࡀ 40 ᰯ(17.3%)ࠊࠕఱࡶࡋ࡚࠸࡞ ࠸ࠋࠖࡀ 22 ᰯ(9.5%)ࠊࠕࡑࡢࠖࡀ 7 ᰯ(3.0%)࡛࠶ࡗࡓࠋ ๓༙ࡢཷᑂᏛᚋ༙ࡢᏛࢆẚ㍑ࡋࡓሙྜࠊ๓༙ࡢᏛࡢྜࡀከࡗࡓࡢࡀࠕ㞟 ࡋࡓሗࢆሗ࿌ࡸຮᙉࡢᐇࡼࡾඹ᭷ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋࠖࠕ᪥ᮏ㧗➼ᩍ⫱ホ౯ᶵᵓࡢ ᇶ‽ࢆ㋃ࡲ࠼ࡓ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯ࢆᐇࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ࡛ࠖࠊࡑࢀ௨እࡢ㑅ᢥ⫥ࡘ࠸࡚ࡣᚋ༙ ࡢᏛࡢྜࡀከࡗࡓࠋ≉ᚋ༙ࡢྜࡀ㧗ࡗࡓࡢࡣࠕఱࡶࡋ࡚࠸࡞࠸ࠋ࡛ࠖࠊ๓༙ ࡢᏛ࡛ࡣࠊ2 ᅇ┠ࡢㄆドホ౯ྥࡅࡓ‽ഛࡶ㋃ࡲ࠼ࡓ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯άືࡀᐇࡉࢀ࡚ ࠸ࡿࡇࡀ࠺ࡀ࠼ࡿࠋ ࡞࠾ࠊࠕࡑࡢࠖᅇ⟅ࡋࡓᏛࡢពぢࡣࠊࠕ㞟ࡋࡓሗࢆ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯ጤဨ ᥦ♧ࡋ࡚ሗࡢඹ᭷ࢆᅗࡗ࡚࠸ࡿࠋࠖࠕḟᖺᗘࡼࡾᶵᵓࡢᇶ‽ᇶ࡙ࡃ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨ࢆண ᐃࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋࠖࠕ᪂ࡋ࠸ᇶ‽ࢆ㋃ࡲ࠼࡚⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯ࡢࢫࢣࢪ࣮ࣗࣝ➼ࡘ࠸᳨࡚ウࡋ ࡚࠸ࡿࠋࠖ࡞ࡢពぢࡀ࠶ࡗࡓࠋ 㻌 ᅇ⟅ᩘ㻌 㻌 䐟ఱ䜒䛧䛶䛔䛺䛔䚹㻌 ᅇ⟅ẚ㻌 㻞㻞㻌 㻥㻚㻡㻑㻌 㻝㻡㻜㻌 㻢㻠㻚㻥㻑㻌 㻡㻥㻌 㻞㻡㻚㻡㻑㻌 㻣㻟㻌 㻟㻝㻚㻠㻑㻌 㻠㻜㻌 㻝㻣㻚㻟㻑㻌 㻌 䐤䛭䛾㻌 㻣㻌 㻟㻚㻜㻑㻌 㻌 䐥↓ᅇ⟅㻌 㻜㻌 㻜㻚㻜㻑㻌 㻌 䐠䝩䞊䝮䝨䞊䝆䜔䝉䝭䝘䞊䛾ཧຍ䛺䛹䛻䜘䜚㛵㐃ሗ䜢㞟䛧䛶䛔䜛䚹㻌 㻌 䐡㞟䛧䛯ሗ䜢ሗ࿌䜔ຮᙉ䛾ᐇ䛻䜘䜚ඹ᭷䛧䛶䛔䜛䚹㻌 㻌 䐢Ꮫ⊂⮬䛾⮬ᕫ䞉Ⅼ᳨ホ౯㡯┠䛾ぢ┤䛧䜔Ꮫ⊂⮬䛾≉Ⰽ䛒䜛ᇶ‽䜢 ᳨ウ䛧䛶䛔䜛䚹㻌 㻌 䐣᪥ᮏ㧗➼ᩍ⫱ホ౯ᶵᵓ䛾ᇶ‽䜢㋃䜎䛘䛯⮬ᕫⅬ᳨䞉ホ౯䛾ᐇ䜢䛧䛶 䛔䜛䚹㻌 㸦ᅇ⟅ẚ㸸 ㉁ၥ 36 ࡛ࠕղࠖ㹼ࠕմࠖᅇ⟅Ꮫᩘ㸦231㸧ᑐࡍࡿᅇ⟅ࡢẚ⋡㸧 48 ϭϱϬ ϭϲϬ ϭϰϬ ϭϮϬ ϭϬϬ ϳϯ ϴϬ ϱϵ ϲϬ ϰϬ ϰϬ ϮϮ ϳ ϮϬ Ϭ Ϭ 䐟 䐠 䐡 䐢 䐣 䐤 䐥 㸦 㸧ෆࡣᅇ⟅Ꮫᩘ 㻌 㻝㻣㻙㻞㻜 ᖺᗘ䠄㻥㻢䠅㻌 㻌 㻌 ᅇ⟅ᩘ㻌 㻞㻝㻘㻞㻞 ᖺᗘ㻔㻝㻟㻡㻕㻌 ᅇ⟅ẚ㻌 ᅇ⟅ᩘ㻌 ᅇ⟅ẚ㻌 㻌 䐟㻌 㻤㻌 㻤㻚㻟㻑㻌 㻝㻠㻌 㻝㻜㻚㻠㻑㻌 㻌 䐠㻌 㻢㻤㻌 㻣㻜㻚㻤㻑㻌 㻤㻞㻌 㻢㻜㻚㻣㻑㻌 㻌 䐡㻌 㻟㻠㻌 㻟㻡㻚㻠㻑㻌 㻞㻡㻌 㻝㻤㻚㻡㻑㻌 㻌 䐢㻌 㻟㻟㻌 㻟㻠㻚㻠㻑㻌 㻠㻜㻌 㻞㻥㻚㻢㻑㻌 㻌 䐣㻌 㻞㻝㻌 㻞㻝㻚㻥㻑㻌 㻝㻥㻌 㻝㻠㻚㻝㻑㻌 㻌 䐤㻌 㻝㻌 㻝㻚㻜㻑㻌 㻢㻌 㻠㻚㻠㻑㻌 㻌 䐥㻌 㻜㻌 㻜㻚㻜㻑㻌 㻜㻌 㻜㻚㻜㻑㻌 㸦ྛᅇ⟅ࡢྜィࢆ 100%ࡋࡓሙྜࡢᖺᗘูࡢྜ㸧 䐟 ϯϲ͘ϰй ϭϳͲϮϬᖺᗘ Ϯϭ͕ϮϮᖺᗘ 䐠 ϰϱ͘ϯй 䐡 ϱϰ͘ϳй ϱϳ͘ϲй 䐢 ϰϮ͘ϰй ϰϱ͘Ϯй 䐣 䐤 ϲϯ͘ϲй ϱϰ͘ϴй ϱϮ͘ϱй ϭϰ͘ϯй Ϭй ϰϳ͘ϱй ϴϱ͘ϳй ϱϬй ϭϬϬй ࡞ពぢࡣ௨ୗࡢ㏻ࡾࠋ ࣭⮬ᕫⅬ᳨ጤဨ࡛ඹ᭷ࡋࡓࠋᩍᤵ࡛ࡣᇶ‽ࡀኚ᭦࡞ࡿࡇࢆሗ࿌ࠋົᒁㄢ㛗㆟ ࡛ࡣ᪂ᇶ‽㸦㸧ࢆ㓄ࠋᮏᖺᗘ୰᪂ᇶ‽ࢆᏛෆ࡛ඹ᭷ࡋࠊḟᖺᗘࡽ᪂ᇶ‽ᇶ࡙ ࡁ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯ࢆᐇࡍࡿணᐃࠋ ࣭⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯ጤဨ࡛ሗ࿌ࡋࠊㄆ㆑ࡢඹ᭷ࢆᅗࡗ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ ࣭㞟ࡋࡓሗࢆ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯ጤဨᥦ♧ࡋ࡚ሗࡢඹ᭷ࢆᅗࡗ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ ࣭ḟᖺᗘࡼࡾᶵᵓࡢᇶ‽ᇶ࡙ࡃ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨ࢆணᐃࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ 49 ࣭ᮏᖺᗘࡢ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨ホ౯ሗ࿌᭩ࡣᏛ⊂⮬ࡢ㡯┠࡛࠶ࡿࡀࠊᮏᏛ⊂⮬ࡢ㡯┠ࡢ୰ホ౯ᶵ ᵓᵝࡢ᪂ᇶ‽ࡢෆᐜࡀྵࡲࢀ࡞࠸ሙྜࡣグ㍕ࡍࡿࡇࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ ࣭᪂ࡋ࠸ᇶ‽ࢆ㋃ࡲ࠼࡚⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯ࡢࢫࢣࢪ࣮ࣗࣝ➼ࡘ࠸᳨࡚ウࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ タၥ ᅇ┠ࡢㄆドホ౯ࡶ᪥ᮏ㧗➼ᩍ⫱ホ౯ᶵᵓ࡛ཷࡅࡿணᐃ࡛ࡍࠋ 2 ᅇ┠ࡢㄆドホ౯ࡶホ౯ᶵᵓ࡛ཷࡅࡿணᐃ࠺ࡘ࠸࡚ࠊࠕࡣ࠸ࠖࡢᅇ⟅ࡀ 258 ᰯ ୰ 213 ᰯ(82.6%)ࠊࠕ࠸࠸࠼ࠖࡢᅇ⟅ࡀ 3 ᰯ(1.2%)ࠊࠕ᳨ウ୰ࠖࡢᅇ⟅ࡀ 41 ᰯ(15.9%)࡛ ࠶ࡗࡓࠋ ࠕ࠸࠸࠼ࠖࡢᏛࡘ࠸࡚ࡣࠊホ౯ᶵ㛵ࢆኚ᭦ࡉࢀࡿ⌮⏤ࢆ☜ㄆࡋ࡞ࡅࢀࡤ࡞ࡽ࡞࠸ࠋ ࡲࡓࠊࠕ᳨ウ୰ࠖࡢᏛࡘ࠸࡚ࡣࠊ᳨ウ୰ࡢ⌮⏤ࡸホ౯ᶵᵓ࡛ཷࡅ࡚࠸ࡓࡔࡃࡓࡵఱ ࡀᚲせ࡞ࡢࢆ☜ㄆࡍࡿᚲせࡀ࠶ࡿࠋ 㻌 䛿䛔㻌 㻞㻝㻟㻌 㻤㻞㻚㻢㻑㻌 㻌 䛔䛔䛘㻌 㻟㻌 㻝㻚㻞㻑㻌 㻌 ᳨ウ୰㻌 㻠㻝㻌 㻝㻡㻚㻥㻑㻌 㻌 ↓ᅇ⟅㻌 㻝㻌 㻜㻚㻠㻑㻌 タၥ㹼ㄆドホ౯ᶵ㛵ࢆỴᐃࡍࡿ㝿ඃඛࡋ࡚࠸ࡿ㡯ࢆᩍ࠼࡚ࡃࡔࡉ࠸ࠋ ㄆドホ౯ᶵ㛵ࢆỴᐃࡍࡿ㝿ࠕ᭱ࡶඃඛࡋ࡚࠸ࡿ㡯ࠖࠕ2 ␒┠ඃඛࡋ࡚࠸ࡿ㡯ࠖ ࠕ3 ␒┠ඃඛࡋ࡚࠸ࡿ㡯ࠖࢆ☜ㄆࡋࡓࠋ ࠕ᭱ࡶඃඛࡋ࡚࠸ࡿ㡯࡛ࠖࡣࠊࠕホ౯ᇶ‽ࠖࡀ 258 ᰯ୰ 113 ᰯ(43.8%)ࠊࠕຍ┕ࡋ࡚ ࠸ࡿ⚾Ꮫᅋయࡢ㛵ಀᛶࠖࡀ 80 ᰯ(31.0%)ࠊ ࠕホ౯ࡢࣉࣟࢭࢫࠖࡀ 29 ᰯ(11.2%)⥆࠸ࡓࠋ ࠕ2 ␒┠ඃඛࡋ࡚࠸ࡿ㡯࡛ࠖࡣࠊࠕホ౯ࡢࣉࣟࢭࢫࠖࡀ 105 ᰯ(40.7%)ࠊࠕホ౯ᇶ‽ࠖ ࡀ 69 ᰯ(26.7%)ࠊࠕᆅᇦࡸつᶍ➼ࢆྵࡴᏛࡢືྥࠖࡀ 28 ᰯ(10.9%)࡛࠶ࡗࡓࠋ ࠕ3 ␒┠ඃඛࡋ࡚࠸ࡿ㡯࡛ࠖࡣࠊࠕᏛࡶྵࡴ㐣ཤࡢホ౯⤖ᯝࠖࡀ 63 ᰯ(24.4%)ࠊ ࠕホ౯ࡢࣉࣟࢭࢫࠖࡀ 43 ᰯ(16.7%)ࠊࠕ㈝⏝㸦ホ౯ᩱ㸧ࠖࡀ 41 ᰯ(15.9%)࡛࠶ࡗࡓࠋ ࠕホ౯ᇶ‽ࠖࠕホ౯ࡢࣉࣟࢭࢫࠖࡘ࠸࡚ࡣࠊඃඛ㡰ࡀ㧗ࡃࠊㄆドホ౯ᶵ㛵ࢆỴᐃ ࡍࡿୖ࡛㔜せ࡞⨨ࡅ࠶ࡿࡇࡀศࡿࠋࡲࡓࠊࠕ3 ␒┠ඃඛࡋ࡚࠸ࡿ㡯ࠖࡘ ࠸࡚ࡣࠊᅇ⟅ࡀศᩓࡋ࡚࠾ࡾࡑࢀࡒࢀࡢᏛࡢ≧ἣࡼࡗ࡚␗࡞ࡿᵝᏊࡀ࠺ࡀ࠼ࡿࠋ ࡞࠾ࠊࠕࡑࡢࠖᅇ⟅ࡋࡓᏛࡢពぢࡣࠊࠕඃඛ㡰ࡼࡾࡶࠊࡉࡲࡊࡲ࡞せ⣲ࢆ⥲ ྜⓗ᳨ウุ࣭᩿ࡋ࡚Ỵᐃࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋࠖࠕ๓ᅇࡢㄆドホ౯ࡢ㐃⥆ᛶࠖ࡞ࡢពぢࡀ࠶ࡗࡓࠋ 50 㻌 ᭱䜒ඃඛ㻌 㻞 ␒┠䛻ඃඛ㻌 㻟 ␒┠䛻ඃඛ㻌 㻌 䐟ホ౯ᇶ‽㻌 㻝㻝㻟㻌 㻠㻟㻚㻤㻑㻌 㻢㻥㻌 㻞㻢㻚㻣㻑㻌 㻞㻣㻌 㻝㻜㻚㻡㻑㻌 㻌 䐠ホ౯䛾䝥䝻䝉䝇㻌 㻞㻥㻌 㻝㻝㻚㻞㻑㻌 㻝㻜㻡㻌 㻠㻜㻚㻣㻑㻌 㻠㻟㻌 㻝㻢㻚㻣㻑㻌 㻌 䐡㈝⏝䠄ホ౯ᩱ䠅㻌 㻝㻌 㻜㻚㻠㻑㻌 㻡㻌 㻝㻚㻥㻑㻌 㻠㻝㻌 㻝㻡㻚㻥㻑㻌 㻌 䐢Ꮫ䜒ྵ䜐㐣ཤ䛾ホ౯⤖ᯝ㻌 㻝㻢㻌 㻢㻚㻞㻑㻌 㻞㻞㻌 㻤㻚㻡㻑㻌 㻢㻟㻌 㻞㻠㻚㻠㻑㻌 㻌 䐣ຍ┕䛧䛶䛔䜛⚾Ꮫᅋయ䛸䛾㛵ಀᛶ㻌 㻤㻜㻌 㻟㻝㻚㻜㻑㻌 㻞㻜㻌 㻣㻚㻤㻑㻌 㻟㻠㻌 㻝㻟㻚㻞㻑㻌 㻌 䐤ᆅᇦ䜔つᶍ➼䜢ྵ䜐Ꮫ䛾ືྥ㻌 㻝㻞㻌 㻠㻚㻣㻑㻌 㻞㻤㻌 㻝㻜㻚㻥㻑㻌 㻟㻟㻌 㻝㻞㻚㻤㻑㻌 㻌 䐥䛭䛾㻌 㻝㻌 㻜㻚㻠㻑㻌 㻟㻌 㻝㻚㻞㻑㻌 㻠㻌 㻝㻚㻢㻑㻌 㻌 䐦↓ᅇ⟅㻌 㻢㻌 㻞㻚㻟㻑㻌 㻢㻌 㻞㻚㻟㻑㻌 㻝㻟㻌 㻡㻚㻜㻑㻌 ϭϮϬ ϭϬϬ ϴϬ ϲϬ ϰϬ ϮϬ Ϭ ձ ղ ճ մ յ ն շ ո ϭϭϯ Ϯϵ ϭ ϭϲ ϴϬ ϭϮ ϭ ϲ Ϯ␒┠ ϲϵ ϭϬϱ ϱ ϮϮ ϮϬ Ϯϴ ϯ ϲ ϯ␒┠ Ϯϳ ϰϯ ϰϭ ϲϯ ϯϰ ϯϯ ϰ ϭϯ ᭱䜒ඃඛ ࡞ពぢࡣ௨ୗࡢ㏻ࡾࠋ ࣭ඃඛ㡰ࡼࡾࡶࠊࡉࡲࡊࡲ࡞せ⣲ࢆ⥲ྜⓗ᳨ウุ࣭᩿ࡋ࡚Ỵᐃࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ ࣭ㄆドホ౯ࡼࡾᏛෆࡀࢀࡔࡅάᛶࡋࡓ࠺ࠋ ࣭⌮ࡢ᪉㔪 ࣭๓ᅇࡢㄆドホ౯ࡢ㐃⥆ᛶ ࣭▷ᮇᏛࡢᩚྜᛶ タၥ ᅇ┠ ᅇ┠ࡢㄆドホ౯ཷᑂࡢ⮬ᕫホ౯ᢸᙜ⪅/2ࡣྠ୍ே≀࡛ࡍࠋ⌧ẁ 㝵࡛ࡢணᐃ࡛ᵓ࠸ࡲࡏࢇࡢ࡛ᩍ࠼࡚ࡃࡔࡉ࠸ࠋ 2 ᅇ┠ࡢㄆドホ౯ྥࡅ࡚ࠊ⮬ᕫホ౯ᢸᙜ⪅(LO)ࡀ 1 ᅇ┠ࡢ⮬ᕫホ౯ᢸᙜ⪅ྠࡌே≀ ࠺ࡘ࠸࡚ࠊࠕᮍᐃ᳨࣭ウ୰ࠖ࠸࠺ᅇ⟅ࡀ 258 ᰯ୰ 135 ᰯ(52.3%)ࠊࠕ㐪࠺ே≀ ࢆ⪃࠼࡚࠸ࡿࠋࠖࡀ 72 ᰯ(27.9%)ࠊࠕྠ୍ே≀ࢆ⪃࠼࡚࠸ࡿࠋࠖࡀ 44 ᰯ(17.1%)⥆࠸ࡓࠋ ๓༙ࡢཷᑂᏛᚋ༙ࡢᏛࢆẚ㍑ࡋࡓሙྜࠊࠕᮍᐃ᳨࣭ウ୰ࠖࠕྠ୍ே≀ࢆ⪃࠼࡚࠸ ࡿࠋࠖࡢᅇ⟅ࡀᚋ༙ࡢᏛࡢྜࡀከࡗࡓࠋ 51 㻌 䐟䛿䛔㻌 ྠ୍ே≀䜢⪃䛘䛶䛔䜛䚹㻌 㻠㻠㻌 㻝㻣㻚㻝㻑㻌 㻌 䐠䛔䛔䛘㻌 㐪䛖ே≀䜢⪃䛘䛶䛔䜛䚹㻌 㻣㻞㻌 㻞㻣㻚㻥㻑㻌 㻝㻟㻡㻌 㻡㻞㻚㻟㻑㻌 㻣㻌 㻞㻚㻣㻑㻌 㻌 䐡ᮍᐃ䞉᳨ウ୰㻌 㻌 䐢↓ᅇ⟅㻌 մ Ϯ͘ϳй ձ ϭϳ͘ϭй ճ ϱϮ͘ϯй ղ Ϯϳ͘ϵй 㸦 㸧ෆࡣᅇ⟅Ꮫᩘ 㻌 㻝㻣㻙㻞㻜 ᖺᗘ䠄㻝㻜㻥䠅㻌 㻌 㻌 ᅇ⟅ᩘ㻌 ᅇ⟅ẚ㻌 ᅇ⟅ᩘ㻌 ᅇ⟅ẚ㻌 㻌 䐟㻌 㻝㻣㻌 㻝㻡㻚㻢㻑㻌 㻞㻣㻌 㻝㻤㻚㻝㻑㻌 㻌 䐠㻌 㻟㻤㻌 㻟㻠㻚㻥㻑㻌 㻟㻠㻌 㻞㻞㻚㻤㻑㻌 㻌 䐡㻌 㻠㻥㻌 㻠㻡㻚㻜㻑㻌 㻤㻢㻌 㻡㻣㻚㻣㻑㻌 㻌 䐢㻌 㻡㻌 㻠㻚㻢㻑㻌 㻞㻌 㻝㻚㻟㻑㻌 㻞㻝㻘㻞㻞 ᖺᗘ㻔㻝㻠㻥㻕㻌 㸦ྛᅇ⟅ࡢྜィࢆ ࡋࡓሙྜࡢᖺᗘูࡢྜ㸧 䐟 ϯϴ͘ϲй 䐠 ϭϳͲϮϬᖺᗘ ϲϭ͘ϰй ϱϮ͘ϴй Ϯϭ͕ϮϮᖺᗘ ϰϳ͘Ϯй 䐡 ϯϲ͘ϯй 䐢 ϲϯ͘ϳй ϳϭ͘ϰй Ϭй Ϯϴ͘ϲй ϱϬй ϭϬϬй タၥ㹼⮬ᕫホ౯ᢸᙜ⪅/2ࡣࡢࡼ࠺࡞᮲௳࡛㑅ࡤࢀࡲࡍࠋ ⮬ᕫホ౯ᢸᙜ⪅/2ࡀࡢࡼ࠺࡞᮲௳࡛㑅ࡤࢀࡿࡘ࠸࡚ࠊࠕ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯ࢆ⾜࠺ ጤဨࡢ㛗ࡀ⮬ᕫホ౯ᢸᙜ⪅/2࡞ࡿࠋࠖࡀ ᰯ୰ ᰯࠊࠕ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯ ࢆྲྀࡾࡲࡵࡿ㒊⨫ࡢ㛗ࡀ⮬ᕫホ౯ᢸᙜ⪅/2࡞ࡿࠋࠖࡀ ᰯࠊࠕᩍဨࡀ⮬ᕫ ホ౯ᢸᙜ⪅㸦/2㸧࡞ࡿࠋࠖࡀ ᰯࠊࠕᣦᐃࡢᙺ⫋⪅ࡀ⮬ᕫホ౯ᢸᙜ⪅/2 52 ࡞ࡿࠋࠖࡀ ᰯࠊࠕࡑࡢࠖࡀ ᰯࠊࠕ⫋ဨࡀ⮬ᕫホ౯ᢸᙜ⪅/2࡞ ࡿࠋࠖࡀ ᰯ࡛࠶ࡗࡓࠋ ࠕᣦᐃࡢᙺ⫋⪅ࡀ⮬ᕫホ౯ᢸᙜ⪅/2࡞ࡿࠋࠖᅇ⟅ࡋࡓᏛᣦᐃࡢᙺ⫋ࢆලయⓗ ☜ㄆࡋࡓࡇࢁࠊࠕᏛ㛗࣭Ꮫ㒊㛗࡞ࠖࠕົᒁ㛗࣭ົᒁḟ㛗࡞ࠖࠕᩍᏛᢸᙜ㈐ ௵⪅࣭Ꮫົᢸᙜ㈐௵⪅࡞ࠖ࡞ࡢពぢࡀ࠶ࡗࡓࠋ ࡞࠾ࠊࠕࡑࡢࠖᅇ⟅ࡋࡓᏛࡢពぢࡣࠊࠕ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯ጤဨࡢጤဨࡢ୰ࡽ 㐺௵⪅ࢆᏛ㛗ࡀᣦྡࠖࠕ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯ࡢᴗົ⢭㏻ࡋࡓᩍ⫋ဨࠖ࡞ࡢពぢࡀ࠶ࡗࡓࠋ 㻌 䐟⮬ᕫⅬ᳨䞉ホ౯䜢⾜䛖ጤဨ䛾㛗䛜⮬ᕫホ౯ᢸᙜ⪅㻔㻸㻻㻕䛻䛺䜛䚹㻌 㻣㻠㻌 㻞㻤㻚㻣㻑㻌 㻌 䐠⮬ᕫⅬ᳨䞉ホ౯䜢ྲྀ䜚䜎䛸䜑䜛㒊⨫䛾㛗䛜⮬ᕫホ౯ᢸᙜ⪅㻔㻸㻻㻕䛻䛺䜛䚹㻌 㻢㻡㻌 㻞㻡㻚㻞㻑㻌 㻌 䐡ᣦᐃ䛾ᙺ⫋⪅䛜⮬ᕫホ౯ᢸᙜ⪅㻔㻸㻻㻕䛻䛺䜛䚹㻌 㻟㻢㻌 㻝㻠㻚㻜㻑㻌 㻌 䐢ᩍဨ䛜⮬ᕫホ౯ᢸᙜ⪅䠄㻸㻻䠅䛻䛺䜛䚹㻌 㻟㻣㻌 㻝㻠㻚㻟㻑㻌 㻌 䐣⫋ဨ䛜⮬ᕫホ౯ᢸᙜ⪅䠄㻸㻻䠅䛻䛺䜛䚹㻌 㻝㻤㻌 㻣㻚㻜㻑㻌 㻌 䐤䛭䛾㻌 㻞㻜㻌 㻣㻚㻤㻑㻌 㻌 䐥↓ᅇ⟅㻌 㻤㻌 㻟㻚㻝㻑㻌 ն ϳ͘ϴй շ ϯ͘ϭй ձ Ϯϴ͘ϳй յ ϳ͘Ϭй մ ϭϰ͘ϯй ճ ϭϰ͘Ϭй ղ Ϯϱ͘Ϯй ᣦᐃࡢᙺ⫋ࡘ࠸࡚ලయⓗᩍ࠼࡚ࡃࡔࡉ࠸ࠋ 㻌 Ꮫ㛗䞉Ꮫ㒊㛗䛺䛹㻌 㻤㻌 㻌 ົᒁ㛗䞉ົᒁḟ㛗䛺䛹㻌 㻤㻌 㻌 ᩍᏛᢸᙜ㈐௵⪅䞉Ꮫົᢸᙜ㈐௵⪅䛺䛹㻌 㻡㻌 㻌 ⥲ົ㒊㛗㻌 㻠㻌 㻌 ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨䞉ホ౯ጤဨጤဨ㛗㻌 㻠㻌 㻌 ↓ᅇ⟅㻌 㻟㻌 㻌 䛭䛾㻌 㻠㻌 ࡑࡢࡢ࡞ពぢࡣ௨ୗࡢ㏻ࡾࠋ ࣭⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯ጤဨࡢጤဨࡢ୰ࡽ㐺௵⪅ࢆᏛ㛗ࡀᣦྡ ࣭⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯ጤဨࡢ୰ࡽᏛ㛗ࡀ㐺௵⪅ࢆ௵ ࣭⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯⤫ᣓጤဨ࡚᥎⸀ࡋࡓ⪅ࢆ⌮࡛ᢎㄆ 53 ࣭⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯ࢆྲྀࡾࡲࡵࡿጤဨࡢ࠺ࡕࠊ㐺௵ㄆࡵࡽࢀࡿᩍ⫋ဨ ࣭⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯ࡢᴗົ⢭㏻ࡋࡓᩍ⫋ဨ ࣭ጤဨࡢୗ⨨ࢀࡿ࣮࣡࢟ࣥࢢࢢ࣮ࣝࣉࡢ㛗 ࣭LO ࡋ࡚┦ᛂࡋ࠸⫋㈐࠶ࡿࡶࡢ ࣭⌮㛗࣭Ꮫ㛗ࡢ㑅ᐃࡋࡓᙺ⫋⪅ ࣭Ꮫ㛗ࡢ᥎⸀ࡼࡾ⌮㛗ࡀ௵ ࣭Ꮫ㛗ࡢᣦྡ ࣭ᑐ㇟ᖺᗘࡢ㏆㞄᳨ウ ࣭ࡑࡢⅬ࡛ࡢ㐺௵⪅ࢆ㑅ᐃ ▷ᮇᏛࡢㄆドホ౯ࡘ࠸࡚ タၥྠ୍ἲேෆ▷ᮇᏛࢆタ⨨ࡋ࡚࠸ࡲࡍࠋ ྠ୍ἲேෆ▷ᮇᏛࢆタ⨨ࡉࢀ࡚࠸ࡿ࠺ࡘ࠸࡚ࠊࠕࡣ࠸ࠖࡢᅇ⟅ࡀ 258 ᰯ୰ 130 ᰯ(50.4%)ࠊࠕ࠸࠸࠼ࠖࡢᅇ⟅ࡀ 117 ᰯ(45.3%)࡛࠶ࡗࡓࠋ 㻌 䛿䛔㻌 㻝㻟㻜㻌 㻡㻜㻚㻠㻑㻌 㻌 䛔䛔䛘㻌 㻝㻝㻣㻌 㻠㻡㻚㻟㻑㻌 㻌 ↓ᅇ⟅㻌 㻝㻝㻌 㻠㻚㻟㻑㻌 タၥ᪥ᮏ㧗➼ᩍ⫱ホ౯ᶵᵓ࡛ࡣᖹᡂ ᖺᗘࡽ▷ᮇᏛࡢဨไᗘࢆⓎ㊊ࡋࡲࡋࡓ ࡀࠊධࢆ᳨ウࡋ࡚࠸ࡲࡍࠋ ホ౯ᶵᵓ࡛ࡣᖹᡂ 23(2011)ᖺᗘࡽ▷ᮇᏛࡢဨไᗘࢆⓎ㊊ࡋࡓࡀࠊධࢆ᳨ウࡉࢀ ࡚࠸ࡿࡘ࠸࡚ࠊࠕࡣ࠸ࠖࡢᅇ⟅ࡀ 130 ᰯ୰ 18 ᰯ(13.8%)ࠊࠕ࠸࠸࠼ࠖࡢᅇ⟅ࡀ 106 ᰯ (81.5%)ࠊࠕࡍ࡛ධࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠖࡣ 0 ᰯ࡛࠶ࡗࡓࠋ ࡞࠾ࠊᖹᡂ 24 ᖺ 3 ᭶Ⅼ࡛ 2 ▷ᮇᏛࡀධࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ 㻌 䛿䛔㻌 㻝㻤㻌 㻝㻟㻚㻤㻑㻌 㻝㻜㻢㻌 㻤㻝㻚㻡㻑㻌 㻌 䛩䛷䛻ධ䛧䛶䛔䜛㻌 㻜㻌 㻜㻚㻜㻑㻌 㻌 ↓ᅇ⟅㻌 㻢㻌 㻠㻚㻢㻑㻌 㻌 䛔䛔䛘㻌 タၥ᪥ᮏ㧗➼ᩍ⫱ホ౯ᶵᵓ࡛ࡣ▷ᮇᏛࡢᶵ㛵ูㄆドホ౯ࡶᐇ࡛ࡁࡲࡍࡀࠊᙜᶵᵓ ࡛▷ᮇᏛᶵ㛵ูㄆドホ౯ࢆཷᑂࡍࡿࡇࢆ᳨ウࡋ࡚࠸ࡲࡍࠋ ▷ᮇᏛࡢㄆドホ౯ࡘ࠸࡚ࠊホ౯ᶵᵓ࡛ࡢཷᑂࢆ᳨ウࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࡘ࠸࡚ࠊࠕࡣ࠸ࠖ ࡢᅇ⟅ࡀ 130 ᰯ୰ 21 ᰯ(16.2%)ࠊࠕ࠸࠸࠼ࠖࡢᅇ⟅ࡀ 101 ᰯ(77.7%)࡛࠶ࡗࡓࠋ 㻌 䛿䛔㻌 㻞㻝㻌 㻝㻢㻚㻞㻑㻌 㻌 䛔䛔䛘㻌 㻝㻜㻝㻌 㻣㻣㻚㻣㻑㻌 㻌 ↓ᅇ⟅㻌 㻤㻌 㻢㻚㻞㻑㻌 54 タၥᏛࡢ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯యไ▷ᮇᏛࡢ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯యไࡣྠࡌ࡛ࡍࠋ ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯ࡢయไࡘ࠸࡚ࠊᏛࡢホ౯యไ▷ᮇᏛࡢホ౯యไࡀྠࡌ࠺ ࡘ࠸࡚ࠊࠕ⤌⧊ࡶᵓᡂࡶࡑࢀࡒࢀ⊂⮬ᐇࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋࠖࡀ ᰯ୰ ᰯࠊࠕᵓ ᡂࡣྠࡌࡔࡀ␗࡞ࡿ࣓ࣥࣂ࣮࡛ᐇࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ 㸦࣓ࣥࣂ࣮㔜」࠶ࡾ㸧ࠖࡀ ᰯࠊ ࠕࡃྠࡌ⤌⧊࡛ᐇࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋࠖࡀ ᰯࠊࠕᵓᡂࡣྠࡌࡔࡀ␗࡞ࡿ࣓ࣥࣂ࣮࡛ ᐇࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ㸦࣓ࣥࣂ࣮㔜」࡞ࡋ㸧ࠖࡀ ᰯ࡛࠶ࡗࡓࠋ ༙ᩘ௨ୖࡀᏛ▷ᮇᏛࡢࡑࢀࡒࢀ࡛ᐇࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࡀࠊṧࡾࡢ⣙༙ᩘࡣࠊྠࡌࡼ࠺࡞ ⤌⧊ࡸᵓᡂ࡛ᐇࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࡇࡀ☜ㄆ࡛ࡁࡓࠋ 㻌 䐟䛟ྠ䛨⤌⧊䛷ᐇ䛧䛶䛔䜛䚹㻌 㻝㻟㻌 㻝㻜㻚㻜㻑㻌 㻌 䐠ᵓᡂ䛿ྠ䛨䛰䛜␗䛺䜛䝯䞁䝞䞊䛷ᐇ䛧䛶䛔䜛䚹䠄䝯䞁䝞䞊䛻㔜」䛒䜚䠅㻌 㻟㻞㻌 㻞㻠㻚㻢㻑㻌 㻌 䐡ᵓᡂ䛿ྠ䛨䛰䛜␗䛺䜛䝯䞁䝞䞊䛷ᐇ䛧䛶䛔䜛䚹䠄䝯䞁䝞䞊䛻㔜」䛺䛧䠅㻌 㻝㻝㻌 㻤㻚㻡㻑㻌 㻌 䐢⤌⧊䜒ᵓᡂ䜒䛭䜜䛮䜜⊂⮬䛻ᐇ䛧䛶䛔䜛䚹㻌 㻢㻥㻌 㻡㻟㻚㻝㻑㻌 㻡㻌 㻟㻚㻤㻑㻌 㻌 䐣↓ᅇ⟅㻌 ᪥ᮏ㧗➼ᩍ⫱ホ౯ᶵᵓᑐࡋ࡚ࡢࡈពぢ タၥホ౯ᶵᵓᑐࡋ࡚ᚋࡢࡼ࠺࡞ࡇࢆᮇᚅࡋࡲࡍࠋ ࡍ࡛ホ౯ᶵᵓ࡛ホ౯ࢆཷᑂࡋࡓᏛࡀࠊᚋホ౯ᶵᵓࡢࡼ࠺࡞ࡇࢆᮇᚅࡍࡿࠊ ࡢ㡯ࡘ࠸࡚ពぢࢆఛࡗࡓࠋ ڦㄆ▱ᗘࡸ♫ⓗᆅ㸦ࢫࢸ࣮ࢱࢫ㸧ࡢྥୖ 㻌 䐟䛸䛶䜒ᮇᚅ䛩䜛㻌 㻌 䐠ᮇᚅ䛩䜛㻌 㻌 䐡䛒䜎䜚ᮇᚅ䛧䛺䛔㻌 㻥㻡㻌 㻝㻟㻥㻌 㻟㻢㻚㻤㻑㻌 㻡㻟㻚㻥㻑㻌 㻝㻌 㻜㻚㻠㻑㻌 㻌 䐢⌧≧䛷‶㊊㻌 㻝㻡㻌 㻡㻚㻤㻑㻌 㻌 䐣䜟䛛䜙䛺䛔㻌 㻞㻌 㻜㻚㻤㻑㻌 㻌 䐤↓ᅇ⟅㻌 㻢㻌 㻞㻚㻟㻑㻌 մ ճ ϱ͘ϴй Ϭ͘ϰй յ Ϭ͘ϴй ն Ϯ͘ϯй ձ ϯϲ͘ϴй ղ ϱϯ͘ϵй ࠕㄆ▱ᗘࡸ♫ⓗᆅ㸦ࢫࢸ࣮ࢱࢫ㸧ࡢྥୖࠖࢆᮇᚅࡍࡿࡘ࠸࡚ࡣࠊࠕ࡚ࡶᮇᚅ ࡍࡿࠖࡀ ᰯ୰ ᰯࠊࠕᮇᚅࡍࡿࠖࡀ ᰯࠊࠕ࠶ࡲࡾᮇᚅࡋ࡞࠸ࠖ ࡀ ᰯࠊࠕ⌧≧࡛‶㊊ࠖࡀ ᰯࠊࠕࢃࡽ࡞࠸ࠖࡀ ᰯ࡛࠶ࡗࡓࠋ ࠕ࡚ࡶᮇᚅࡍࡿࠖࠕᮇᚅࡍࡿࠖࢆేࡏࡿ ࡞ࡾࠊཷᑂࡋࡓホ౯ᶵ㛵ࡢㄆ▱ᗘ ࡸ♫ⓗᆅ㸦ࢫࢸ࣮ࢱࢫ㸧ࡢྥୖࢆᮇᚅࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࡇࡀ☜ㄆ࡛ࡁࡿࠋ 55 ڦᅜෆ࠾ࡅࡿࡢホ౯ᶵ㛵ࡢ㐃ᦠ 㻌 䐟䛸䛶䜒ᮇᚅ䛩䜛㻌 㻌 䐠ᮇᚅ䛩䜛㻌 㻢㻤㻌 㻝㻠㻝㻌 㻌 䐡䛒䜎䜚ᮇᚅ䛧䛺䛔㻌 㻥㻌 㻌 䐢⌧≧䛷‶㊊㻌 㻞㻤㻌 㻌 䐣䜟䛛䜙䛺䛔㻌 㻠㻌 㻌 䐤↓ᅇ⟅㻌 㻤㻌 㻞㻢㻚㻠㻑㻌 㻡㻠㻚㻣㻑㻌 㻟㻚㻡㻑㻌 㻝㻜㻚㻥㻑㻌 㻝㻚㻢㻑㻌 㻟㻚㻝㻑㻌 մ ϭϬ͘ϵй յ ϭ͘ϲй ն ϯ͘ϭй ձ Ϯϲ͘ϰй ճ ϯ͘ϱй ղ ϱϰ͘ϳй ࠕᅜෆ࠾ࡅࡿࡢホ౯ᶵ㛵ࡢ㐃ᦠࠖࢆᮇᚅࡍࡿࡘ࠸࡚ࡣࠊࠕ࡚ࡶᮇᚅࡍࡿࠖ ࡀ ᰯ୰ ᰯࠊࠕᮇᚅࡍࡿࠖࡀ ᰯࠊࠕ࠶ࡲࡾᮇᚅࡋ࡞࠸ࠖࡀ ᰯ ࠊࠕ⌧≧࡛‶㊊ࠖࡀ ᰯࠊࠕࢃࡽ࡞࠸ࠖࡀ ᰯ࡛࠶ࡗࡓࠋ ڦᾏእࡢホ౯ᶵ㛵ࡢ㐃ᦠ 㻌 䐟䛸䛶䜒ᮇᚅ䛩䜛㻌 㻞㻝㻌 㻤㻚㻝㻑㻌 㻝㻝㻟㻌 㻠㻟㻚㻤㻑㻌 㻌 䐡䛒䜎䜚ᮇᚅ䛧䛺䛔㻌 㻠㻥㻌 㻝㻥㻚㻜㻑㻌 㻌 䐢⌧≧䛷‶㊊㻌 㻠㻝㻌 㻝㻡㻚㻥㻑㻌 㻌 䐣䜟䛛䜙䛺䛔㻌 㻞㻤㻌 㻝㻜㻚㻥㻑㻌 㻢㻌 㻞㻚㻟㻑㻌 㻌 䐠ᮇᚅ䛩䜛㻌 㻌 䐤↓ᅇ⟅㻌 ն յ Ϯ͘ϯй ϭϬ͘ϵй ձ ϴ͘ϭй մ ϭϱ͘ϵй ղ ϰϯ͘ϴй ճ ϭϵ͘Ϭй ࠕᾏእࡢホ౯ᶵ㛵ࡢ㐃ᦠࠖࢆᮇᚅࡍࡿࡘ࠸࡚ࡣࠊࠕ࡚ࡶᮇᚅࡍࡿࠖࡀ ᰯ୰ ᰯࠊࠕᮇᚅࡍࡿࠖࡀ ᰯࠊࠕ࠶ࡲࡾᮇᚅࡋ࡞࠸ࠖࡀ ᰯࠊࠕ⌧ ≧࡛‶㊊ࠖࡀ ᰯࠊࠕࢃࡽ࡞࠸ࠖࡀ ᰯ࡛࠶ࡗࡓࠋ ࠕ࡚ࡶᮇᚅࡍࡿࠖࠕᮇᚅࡍࡿࠖࢆేࡏࡿ ࡞ࡾࠊ༙ᩘ௨ୖࡀᮇᚅࡋ࡚࠸ࡿ༙ 㠃ࠊࠕ࠶ࡲࡾᮇᚅࡋ࡞࠸ࠖࠕ⌧≧࡛‶㊊ࠖࢆేࡏࡿ ࡞ࡾᮇᚅ್ࡀࡉ㧗ࡃ࡞ ࠸ࡇࡀ☜ㄆ࡛ࡁࡿࠋ 56 ⚾ڦᏛ≉ࡋࡓホ౯ᇶ‽ࡢタᐃ 㻌 䐟䛸䛶䜒ᮇᚅ䛩䜛㻌 㻝㻝㻤㻌 㻌 䐠ᮇᚅ䛩䜛㻌 㻝㻝㻝㻌 㻌 䐡䛒䜎䜚ᮇᚅ䛧䛺䛔㻌 㻡㻌 㻠㻡㻚㻣㻑㻌 㻠㻟㻚㻜㻑㻌 ն յ մ ϭ͘ϲй Ϯ͘ϯй ճ ϱ͘ϰй ϭ͘ϵй 㻝㻚㻥㻑㻌 㻡㻚㻠㻑㻌 㻌 䐢⌧≧䛷‶㊊㻌 㻝㻠㻌 㻌 䐣䜟䛛䜙䛺䛔㻌 㻠㻌 㻝㻚㻢㻑㻌 㻌 䐤↓ᅇ⟅㻌 㻢㻌 㻞㻚㻟㻑㻌 ձ ϰϱ͘ϳй ղ ϰϯ͘Ϭй ࠕ⚾Ꮫ≉ࡋࡓホ౯ᇶ‽ࡢタᐃࠖࢆᮇᚅࡍࡿࡘ࠸࡚ࡣࠊࠕ࡚ࡶᮇᚅࡍࡿࠖࡀ ᰯ୰ ᰯࠊࠕᮇᚅࡍࡿࠖࡀ ᰯࠊࠕ࠶ࡲࡾᮇᚅࡋ࡞࠸ࠖࡀ ᰯࠊ ࠕ⌧≧࡛‶㊊ࠖࡀ ᰯࠊࠕࢃࡽ࡞࠸ࠖࡀ ᰯ࡛࠶ࡗࡓࠋ ➨ ࢧࢡࣝホ౯ࢆཷᑂࡋࡓ Ꮫࡣ࡚⚾❧Ꮫ࡛࠶ࡗࡓࡀࠊ ࠕ࡚ࡶᮇᚅࡍࡿࠖ ࠕᮇᚅࡍࡿࠖࢆేࡏࡿ ࡞ࡾࠊᮇᚅ್ࡣ㧗࠸ࠋ ڦᅜ㝿ⓗᶆ‽ࢆྲྀධࢀࡓホ౯ᇶ‽ࡢタᐃ 㻌 䐟䛸䛶䜒ᮇᚅ䛩䜛㻌 㻌 䐠ᮇᚅ䛩䜛㻌 㻞㻜㻌 㻝㻜㻟㻌 㻌 䐡䛒䜎䜚ᮇᚅ䛧䛺䛔㻌 㻡㻣㻌 㻌 䐢⌧≧䛷‶㊊㻌 㻡㻞㻌 㻌 䐣䜟䛛䜙䛺䛔㻌 㻝㻤㻌 㻌 䐤↓ᅇ⟅㻌 㻤㻌 㻣㻚㻤㻑㻌 㻟㻥㻚㻥㻑㻌 㻞㻞㻚㻝㻑㻌 㻞㻜㻚㻞㻑㻌 㻣㻚㻜㻑㻌 㻟㻚㻝㻑㻌 ն յ ϯ͘ϭй ϳ͘Ϭй ձ ϳ͘ϴй մ ϮϬ͘Ϯй ղ ϯϵ͘ϵй ճ ϮϮ͘ϭй ࠕᅜ㝿ⓗᶆ‽ࢆྲྀධࢀࡓホ౯ᇶ‽ࡢタᐃࠖࢆᮇᚅࡍࡿࡘ࠸࡚ࡣࠊࠕ࡚ࡶᮇᚅࡍࡿࠖ ࡀ ᰯ୰ ᰯࠊࠕᮇᚅࡍࡿࠖࡀ ᰯࠊࠕ࠶ࡲࡾᮇᚅࡋ࡞࠸ࠖࡀ ᰯ ࠊࠕ⌧≧࡛‶㊊ࠖࡀ ᰯࠊࠕࢃࡽ࡞࠸ࠖࡀ ᰯ࡛࠶ࡗࡓࠋ ࠕ࡚ࡶᮇᚅࡍࡿࠖࠕᮇᚅࡍࡿࠖࢆేࡏࡿ ࡞ࡾࠊ⣙༙ᩘࡀᮇᚅࡋ࡚࠸ࡿุ ᩿ࡍࡿࡇࡶ࡛ࡁࡿࡀࠊࠕ࠶ࡲࡾᮇᚅࡋ࡞࠸ࠖࠕ⌧≧࡛‶㊊ࠖࢆేࡏࡿ ࡞ࡾࠊ ๓㏙ࡢࠕᾏእࡢホ౯ᶵ㛵ࡢ㐃ᦠࠖࡼࡾࡶᮇᚅ್ࡀప࠸ࡇࡀ☜ㄆ࡛ࡁࡿࠋ 57 ڦಶᛶ࣭ᆅᇦ࣭タ⨨Ꮫၥ⣔⤫ࢆ⪃៖ࡋࡓᐃᛶⓗ࡞ุ᩿ 㻌 䐟䛸䛶䜒ᮇᚅ䛩䜛㻌 㻝㻜㻥㻌 㻌 䐠ᮇᚅ䛩䜛㻌 㻝㻞㻟㻌 㻌 䐡䛒䜎䜚ᮇᚅ䛧䛺䛔㻌 㻠㻌 㻌 䐢⌧≧䛷‶㊊㻌 㻝㻟㻌 㻌 䐣䜟䛛䜙䛺䛔㻌 㻝㻌 㻌 䐤↓ᅇ⟅㻌 㻤㻌 㻠㻞㻚㻞㻑㻌 㻠㻣㻚㻣㻑㻌 㻝㻚㻢㻑㻌 㻡㻚㻜㻑㻌 ճ ϭ͘ϲй յ ն մ Ϭ͘ϰй ϯ͘ϭй ϱ͘Ϭй ձ ϰϮ͘Ϯй 㻜㻚㻠㻑㻌 㻟㻚㻝㻑㻌 ղ ϰϳ͘ϳй ࠕಶᛶ࣭ᆅᇦ࣭タ⨨Ꮫၥ⣔⤫ࢆ⪃៖ࡋࡓᐃᛶⓗ࡞ุ᩿ࠖࢆᮇᚅࡍࡿࡘ࠸࡚ࡣࠊࠕ ࡚ࡶᮇᚅࡍࡿࠖࡀ ᰯ୰ ᰯࠊࠕᮇᚅࡍࡿࠖࡀ ᰯࠊࠕ࠶ࡲࡾᮇᚅ ࡋ࡞࠸ࠖࡀ ᰯࠊࠕ⌧≧࡛‶㊊ࠖࡀ ᰯࠊࠕࢃࡽ࡞࠸ࠖࡀ ᰯ࡛࠶ ࡗࡓࠋ ࠕ࡚ࡶᮇᚅࡍࡿࠖࠕᮇᚅࡍࡿࠖࢆేࡏࡿ ࡞ࡾࠊ⣙ ࡀᮇᚅࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࡇ ࡀ☜ㄆ࡛ࡁࡿࠋ ڦ㐣ཤࡢᣦᇶ࡙ࡃබᖹ࡞ุ᩿ 㻌 䐟䛸䛶䜒ᮇᚅ䛩䜛㻌 㻌 䐠ᮇᚅ䛩䜛㻌 㻌 䐡䛒䜎䜚ᮇᚅ䛧䛺䛔㻌 㻥㻠㻌 㻝㻟㻠㻌 㻠㻌 㻌 䐢⌧≧䛷‶㊊㻌 㻝㻤㻌 㻌 䐣䜟䛛䜙䛺䛔㻌 㻞㻌 㻌 䐤↓ᅇ⟅㻌 㻢㻌 㻟㻢㻚㻠㻑㻌 㻡㻝㻚㻥㻑㻌 㻝㻚㻢㻑㻌 㻣㻚㻜㻑㻌 㻜㻚㻤㻑㻌 㻞㻚㻟㻑㻌 ճ ϭ͘ϲй յ ն մ Ϭ͘ϴй Ϯ͘ϯй ϳ͘Ϭй ձ ϯϲ͘ϰй ղ ϱϭ͘ϵй ࠕ㐣ཤࡢᣦᇶ࡙ࡃබᖹ࡞ุ᩿ࠖࢆᮇᚅࡍࡿࡘ࠸࡚ࡣࠊࠕ࡚ࡶᮇᚅࡍࡿࠖࡀ ᰯ୰ ᰯࠊࠕᮇᚅࡍࡿࠖࡀ ᰯࠊࠕ࠶ࡲࡾᮇᚅࡋ࡞࠸ࠖࡀ ᰯࠊ ࠕ⌧≧࡛‶㊊ࠖࡀ ᰯࠊࠕࢃࡽ࡞࠸ࠖࡀ ᰯ࡛࠶ࡗࡓࠋ ࠕ࡚ࡶᮇᚅࡍࡿࠖࠕᮇᚅࡍࡿࠖࢆేࡏࡿ ࡞ࡾࠊ⣙ ࡀᮇᚅࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࡇ ࡀ☜ㄆ࡛ࡁࡿࠋ 58 ࢆ࣮ࣗࣅ࣭ࣞࣆڦព㆑ࡋࡓホ౯ဨ◊ಟࡢᐇ 㻌 䐟䛸䛶䜒ᮇᚅ䛩䜛㻌 㻌 䐠ᮇᚅ䛩䜛㻌 㻌 䐡䛒䜎䜚ᮇᚅ䛧䛺䛔㻌 㻣㻟㻌 㻞㻤㻚㻟㻑㻌 㻝㻟㻥㻌 㻡㻟㻚㻥㻑㻌 㻟㻚㻝㻑㻌 㻤㻌 㻌 䐢⌧≧䛷‶㊊㻌 㻞㻝㻌 㻌 䐣䜟䛛䜙䛺䛔㻌 㻠㻌 㻌 䐤↓ᅇ⟅㻌 㻝㻟㻌 㻤㻚㻝㻑㻌 㻝㻚㻢㻑㻌 յ ϭ͘ϲй ճ ϯ͘ϭй ն ϱ͘Ϭй մ ϴ͘ϭй ձ Ϯϴ͘ϯй 㻡㻚㻜㻑㻌 ղ ϱϯ͘ϵй ࠕࣆ࣭ࣞࣅ࣮ࣗࢆព㆑ࡋࡓホ౯ဨ◊ಟࡢᐇࠖࢆᮇᚅࡍࡿࡘ࠸࡚ࡣࠊࠕ࡚ࡶᮇ ᚅࡍࡿࠖࡀ ᰯ୰ ᰯࠊࠕᮇᚅࡍࡿࠖࡀ ᰯࠊࠕ࠶ࡲࡾᮇᚅࡋ࡞࠸ࠖ ࡀ ᰯࠊࠕ⌧≧࡛‶㊊ࠖࡀ ᰯࠊࠕࢃࡽ࡞࠸ࠖࡀ ᰯ࡛࠶ࡗࡓࠋ ཷڦᑂࡿົ㈇ᢸࡢ㍍ῶ 㻌 䐟䛸䛶䜒ᮇᚅ䛩䜛㻌 㻌 䐠ᮇᚅ䛩䜛㻌 㻝㻡㻟㻌 㻤㻜㻌 㻡㻥㻚㻟㻑㻌 㻟㻝㻚㻜㻑㻌 㻌 䐡䛒䜎䜚ᮇᚅ䛧䛺䛔㻌 㻞㻌 㻜㻚㻤㻑㻌 㻌 䐢⌧≧䛷‶㊊㻌 㻣㻌 㻞㻚㻣㻑㻌 㻌 䐣䜟䛛䜙䛺䛔㻌 㻜㻌 㻜㻚㻜㻑㻌 㻝㻢㻌 㻢㻚㻞㻑㻌 㻌 䐤↓ᅇ⟅㻌 ճ Ϭ͘ϴй ն մ Ϯ͘ϳй ϲ͘Ϯй ղ ϯϭ͘Ϭй ձ ϱϵ͘ϯй ࠕཷᑂࡿົ㈇ᢸࡢ㍍ῶࠖࢆᮇᚅࡍࡿࡘ࠸࡚ࡣࠊࠕ࡚ࡶᮇᚅࡍࡿࠖࡀ ᰯ୰ ᰯࠊࠕᮇᚅࡍࡿࠖࡀ ᰯࠊࠕ࠶ࡲࡾᮇᚅࡋ࡞࠸ࠖࡀ ᰯࠊ ࠕ⌧≧࡛‶㊊ࠖࡀ ᰯ࡛࠶ࡾࠊࠕࢃࡽ࡞࠸ࠖࡣ ᰯ࡛࠶ࡗࡓࠋ ࠕ࡚ࡶᮇᚅࡍࡿࠖࠕᮇᚅࡍࡿࠖࢆేࡏࡿ ࡛࠶ࡿࡀࠊ୰࡛ࡶࠕ࡚ࡶᮇᚅࡍࡿࠖ ࡢྜࡀ㠀ᖖ㧗ࡃࠊཷᑂᏛࡢᮇᚅࡢࡁࡉࢆ☜ㄆࡍࡿࡇࡀ࡛ࡁࡿࠋ 59 ڦᐇᆅㄪᰝࡢ⡆⣲㸦 ᪥㛫Ѝ ᪥㸧 㻌 䐟䛸䛶䜒ᮇᚅ䛩䜛㻌 㻌 䐠ᮇᚅ䛩䜛㻌 㻥㻞㻌 㻝㻜㻤㻌 㻌 䐡䛒䜎䜚ᮇᚅ䛧䛺䛔㻌 㻤㻌 㻌 䐢⌧≧䛷‶㊊㻌 㻠㻝㻌 㻌 䐣䜟䛛䜙䛺䛔㻌 㻟㻌 㻌 䐤↓ᅇ⟅㻌 㻢㻌 㻟㻡㻚㻣㻑㻌 㻠㻝㻚㻥㻑㻌 㻟㻚㻝㻑㻌 㻝㻡㻚㻥㻑㻌 㻝㻚㻞㻑㻌 㻞㻚㻟㻑㻌 յ ն ϭ͘Ϯй Ϯ͘ϯй մ ϭϱ͘ϵй ձ ϯϱ͘ϳй ճ ϯ͘ϭй ղ ϰϭ͘ϵй ࠕᐇᆅㄪᰝࡢ⡆⣲㸦 ᪥㛫ń ᪥㸧ࠖࢆᮇᚅࡍࡿࡘ࠸࡚ࡣࠊࠕ࡚ࡶᮇᚅࡍࡿࠖ ࡀ ᰯ୰ ᰯࠊࠕᮇᚅࡍࡿࠖࡀ ᰯࠊࠕ࠶ࡲࡾᮇᚅࡋ࡞࠸ࠖࡀ ᰯ ࠊࠕ⌧≧࡛‶㊊ࠖࡀ ᰯࠊࠕࢃࡽ࡞࠸ࠖࡀ ᰯ࡛࠶ࡗࡓࠋ ᐇᆅㄪᰝࡢ⡆⣲ࡣࠊ๓㏙ࡢົ㈇ᢸࡢ㍍ῶࡘ࡞ࡀࡿ㒊ศࡶ࠶ࡿ⪃࠼ࡽࢀࡿࡀࠊ ࠕ ࡚ࡶᮇᚅࡍࡿࠖࠕᮇᚅࡍࡿࠖࢆేࡏࡿ ࡛࠶ࡾࠊᮇᚅ್ࡣ㧗ࡃ࡞࠸ࠋ㏫ࠊࠕ⌧≧ ࡛‶㊊ࠖࡢྜࡀ ẚ㍑ⓗ㧗࠸ࡇࡀ☜ㄆ࡛ࡁࡿࠋ ཷڦᑂ๓ࡢ๓┦ㄯࡢᐇ 㻌 䐟䛸䛶䜒ᮇᚅ䛩䜛㻌 㻝㻝㻜㻌 㻠㻞㻚㻢㻑㻌 㻌 䐠ᮇᚅ䛩䜛㻌 㻝㻜㻡㻌 㻠㻜㻚㻣㻑㻌 㻟㻌 㻝㻚㻞㻑㻌 㻌 䐢⌧≧䛷‶㊊㻌 㻟㻞㻌 㻝㻞㻚㻠㻑㻌 㻌 䐣䜟䛛䜙䛺䛔㻌 㻝㻌 㻜㻚㻠㻑㻌 㻌 䐤↓ᅇ⟅㻌 㻣㻌 㻞㻚㻣㻑㻌 㻌 䐡䛒䜎䜚ᮇᚅ䛧䛺䛔㻌 մ ϭϮ͘ϰй յ ն Ϭ͘ϰй Ϯ͘ϳй ճ ϭ͘Ϯй ձ ϰϮ͘ϲй ղ ϰϬ͘ϳй ࠕཷᑂ๓ࡢ๓┦ㄯࡢᐇࠖࢆᮇᚅࡍࡿࡘ࠸࡚ࡣࠊࠕ࡚ࡶᮇᚅࡍࡿࠖࡀ ᰯ୰ ᰯࠊࠕᮇᚅࡍࡿࠖࡀ ᰯࠊࠕ࠶ࡲࡾᮇᚅࡋ࡞࠸ࠖࡀ ᰯࠊࠕ⌧ ≧࡛‶㊊ࠖࡀ ᰯࠊࠕࢃࡽ࡞࠸ࠖࡀ ᰯ࡛࠶ࡗࡓࠋ ཷᑂ๓ࡢ๓┦ㄯࡘ࠸࡚ࡣࠊホ౯ᶵᵓ࠾㉺ࡋ࠸ࡓࡔ࠸࡚┦ㄯࢆཷࡅࡿሙྜᏛ ゼၥࡋ࡚㠃ㄯሙࡢ☜ㄆࡸどᐹ࣮ࣝࢺࡢ☜ㄆࢆ⾜࠺ሙྜࡀ࠶ࡿࡀࠊᖹᡂ ᖺᗘࡢㄆ ドホ౯௨㝆ࠊከࡃࡢᏛࡢ๓┦ㄯᑐᛂࡋ࡚ࡁࡓࠋ ᅇࡢㄪᰝᑐ㇟࡛࠶ࡿ㐣ᖺᗘཷᑂᏛࡘ࠸࡚ࡣࠊ᪤ホ౯ࢆ⤒㦂ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࡓࡵࠊ๓ ┦ㄯࢆ⥅⥆ࡋࠊ‶㊊ᗘࢆྥୖࡍࡿࡓࡵࡣࠊࡼࡾ୍ᒙࡢෆᐜࡢᐇࡀồࡵࡽࢀࡿࠋ 60 ࡢࢫࣅ࣮ࢧ࣮ࢱࣇڦᐇ 㻌 䐟䛸䛶䜒ᮇᚅ䛩䜛㻌 㻢㻤㻌 㻞㻢㻚㻠㻑㻌 㻝㻞㻠㻌 㻠㻤㻚㻝㻑㻌 㻤㻌 㻟㻚㻝㻑㻌 㻌 䐢⌧≧䛷‶㊊㻌 㻡㻜㻌 㻝㻥㻚㻠㻑㻌 㻌 䐣䜟䛛䜙䛺䛔㻌 㻣㻌 㻞㻚㻣㻑㻌 㻌 䐤↓ᅇ⟅㻌 㻝㻌 㻜㻚㻠㻑㻌 㻌 䐠ᮇᚅ䛩䜛㻌 㻌 䐡䛒䜎䜚ᮇᚅ䛧䛺䛔㻌 յ Ϯ͘ϳй ն Ϭ͘ϰй մ ϭϵ͘ϰй ձ Ϯϲ͘ϰй ճ ϯ͘ϭй ղ ϰϴ͘ϭй ࠕࣇࢱ࣮ࢧ࣮ࣅࢫࡢᐇࠖࢆᮇᚅࡍࡿࡘ࠸࡚ࡣࠊࠕ࡚ࡶᮇᚅࡍࡿࠖࡀ ᰯ୰ ᰯࠊࠕᮇᚅࡍࡿࠖࡀ ᰯࠊࠕ࠶ࡲࡾᮇᚅࡋ࡞࠸ࠖࡀ ᰯࠊࠕ⌧ ≧࡛‶㊊ࠖࡀ ᰯࠊࠕࢃࡽ࡞࠸ࠖࡀ ᰯ࡛࠶ࡗࡓࠋ ࠕ࡚ࡶᮇᚅࡍࡿࠖࠕᮇᚅࡍࡿࠖࢆేࡏ࡚ࡶ ࡛࠶ࡾࠊᮇᚅ್ࡣ㧗ࡃ࡞࠸ࠋ ࡸࢪ࣮࣒࣮࣌࣍ڦᶵ㛵ㄅࡢᐇ 㻌 䐟䛸䛶䜒ᮇᚅ䛩䜛㻌 㻌 䐠ᮇᚅ䛩䜛㻌 㻌 䐡䛒䜎䜚ᮇᚅ䛧䛺䛔㻌 㻡㻥㻌 㻝㻟㻞㻌 㻟㻌 㻌 䐢⌧≧䛷‶㊊㻌 㻢㻝㻌 㻌 䐣䜟䛛䜙䛺䛔㻌 㻞㻌 㻌 䐤↓ᅇ⟅㻌 㻝㻌 㻞㻞㻚㻥㻑㻌 㻡㻝㻚㻞㻑㻌 㻝㻚㻞㻑㻌 㻞㻟㻚㻢㻑㻌 㻜㻚㻤㻑㻌 㻜㻚㻠㻑㻌 յ Ϭ͘ϴй ն Ϭ͘ϰй ձ ϮϮ͘ϵй մ Ϯϯ͘ϲй ճ ϭ͘Ϯй ղ ϱϭ͘Ϯй ࠕ࣮࣒࣮࣍࣌ࢪࡸᶵ㛵ㄅࡢᐇࠖࢆᮇᚅࡍࡿࡘ࠸࡚ࡣࠊࠕ࡚ࡶᮇᚅࡍࡿࠖࡀ ᰯ୰ ᰯࠊࠕᮇᚅࡍࡿࠖࡀ ᰯࠊࠕ࠶ࡲࡾᮇᚅࡋ࡞࠸ࠖࡀ ᰯࠊ ࠕ⌧≧࡛‶㊊ࠖࡀ ᰯࠊࠕࢃࡽ࡞࠸ࠖࡀ ᰯ࡛࠶ࡗࡓࠋ ࠕ࡚ࡶᮇᚅࡍࡿࠖࠕᮇᚅࡍࡿࠖࢆేࡏ࡚ࡶ ࡛࠶ࡾࠊᮇᚅ್ࡣ㧗ࡃ࡞࠸ࠋ タၥࡑࡢࠊホ౯ᶵᵓᑐࡋ࡚ᮇᚅࡍࡿྲྀ⤌ࡳࡀ࠶ࢀࡤ࠾⟅࠼ࡃࡔࡉ࠸ࠋ ホ౯ᶵᵓ࡛ホ౯ࢆཷᑂࡋࡓᏛࡀࠊタၥࡢ 㡯௨እᚋホ౯ᶵᵓࡢࡼ࠺࡞ ࡇࢆᮇᚅࡍࡿࡘ࠸࡚ពぢࢆఛࡗࡓࠋ ࡞ពぢࡣࠊࠕ)' ࡸ 6' ࡢ୍⎔ࡋ࡚ࡢㅮ₇➼ࡢᑐᛂࠖࠕ⤂ࠖࡑࡢࠊ タၥࡢ 㡯ᑐࡍࡿ⿵㊊ពぢ࡞ࡶ࠶ࡗࡓࠋ 61 ࡞ពぢࡣ௨ୗࡢ㏻ࡾࠋ ࣭FD ࡸ SD ࡢ୍⎔ࡋ࡚ࡢㅮ₇࡞ࡢᑐᛂࠋ ࣭ᐇᆅㄪᰝࢆᡭཌࡃࡍࡿࡇࡣ࠶ࡾᚓ࡚ࡶࠊ⡆⣲ࡍࡿࡇࡣᑐ࡛࠶ࡿࠋ ࣭㐣ཤࡢᣦࡽࢃࢀࡎࡴࡋࢁ✚ᴟⓗࠊᘓタⓗ࡞ุ᩿ࡀồࡵࡽࢀࡿࠋ ࣭⚾ᏛࡢᏛᰯ⤒Ⴀࡢࡓࡵࠊ⌮࣭ホ㆟ဨ࣭┘ࡢࣞ࣋ࣝࢵࣉᖹ‽ࢆᅗࡿຓゝࠊ 㞟ࡢⓎ⾜࡞ࠋ ࣭ᩍဨࡢᩍ⫱ຊࢆྥୖࡉࡏࡿࡇࢆࠊಁ㐍ࡍࡿࡼ࠺࡞ຓゝࠊ㞟ࡢⓎ⾜࡞ࠋ ࣭⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯άືࡢ㔜せᛶࡸྲྀ⤌ࡳࡢ⤂ࠋ ࣭ᨵၿ࣭ᨵ㠉ࡘ࡞ࡀࡗࡓᏛࡢ࡞ࡢ⤂ࠋ ࣭Ꮫࡢᨵၿዲࢆ⤂ࡋ࡚ࡋ࠸ࠋ ࣭ົᡭ⥆ࡁ࡞ࡢ⡆⣲ࠋ ࣭ホ౯ဨࡼࡗ࡚ࡁࡃ␗࡞ࡿࡢ↓࠸ࡼ࠺ࠊホ౯⤫୍ᛶࢆᣢࡓࡏ࡚ࡋ࠸ࠋ ࣭ホ౯⪅ࡢᩍ⫱ࡢᐇࠋ ࣭ㄆドホ౯ࡸ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨ホ౯ࡔࡅ࡛࡞ࡃࠊᏛᨵ㠉ࡢ┦ㄯ❆ཱྀⓗᶵ⬟ࢆ᭷ࡋ࡚ࡋ࠸ࠋ ࣭Ⅼ᳨ホ౯ࡢࡓࡵࡢᣦᶆᇶ࡙ࡃࢹ࣮ࢱࡢ㞟ࠊ⟶⌮ࠊඹ᭷ࡓࡵࡢࢩࢫࢸ࣒ࢆ㛤Ⓨࠊᥦ౪ࠋ ࣭ᅜෆࡢホ౯ᶵ㛵ࡢ㐃ᦠཬࡧᅜ㝿ⓗᶆ‽ࡢྲྀධࢀ࡞ࡣ㔜せ࡛࠶ࡿࡀࠊ⚾Ꮫ≉ࡋ ࡓホ౯ᇶ‽ࡸᏛࡢಶᛶタ⨨ศ㔝ࢆ⪃៖ࡋࡓࡁࡵ⣽࡞㉁ⓗホ౯ࡢᐇࢆᮇᚅࡍࡿࠋ ࣭ᆅ᪉ࠊᑓ⛉Ꮫࡢᙺࡣᴟࡵ࡚㔜せ࡛࠶ࡿ⪃࠼ࠊᏛࡢ≉ᛶ࣭つᶍᛂࡌࡓホ౯࡛࠶ ࡿࡇࢆᮇᚅࡍࡿࠋ ࣭ㄆドホ౯ࡀ⮬ᕫホ౯ࢆ⏕ࡍไᗘ࡛࠶ࡿ௨ୖࠊホ౯ဨࡣྛᏛࡢ≧ἣࢆࠕᏛࡪࠖࡇ ࡽฟⓎࡍࡿᚲせࡀ࠶ࡿ⪃࠼ࡿࡀࠊホ౯ဨࡣඖࠎᑓ㛛ࢆᣢࡗ࡚࠸ࡿࡇࢆ๓ᥦࡋ࡚࠸ ࡿࡓࡵࠊᑓ㛛௨እࡢࡇࢆᏛࡪጼໃࢆࡿࡇࡀ㞴ࡋ࠸ࡼ࠺ぢཷࡅࡽࢀࡿࠋࡑࡇ࡛ࠊ ホ౯ࡢᶒ㝈ࡣ࡞࠸ࡀㄪᰝ࡞Ⓨゝࡍࡿᶒ㝈ࢆᣢࡘࠕホ౯◊✲ဨࠖࢆタᐃࡋࠊホ౯ဨ ࢆࠕᏛࡪጼໃࠖㄏᑟࡋ࡚ࡣ࠺ࠋࡑࡢ㝿ࠊࠕホ౯⿵ຓဨ࡛ࠖࡣ༢࡞ࡿ㞧⏝ಀ࡞ࡾ ࡡ࡞࠸ࡓࡵࠊ◊✲ࢆࡍࡿ࠸࠺ྡ┠ࡋࠊ୍⯡♫ࡢ᪉ࡸᏛ⫋ဨࢆ᥇⏝ࡋ࡚ࡣ࠺ ࠋ タၥᏛෆࡢ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯άື࠾࠸࡚᪥ᮏ㧗➼ᩍ⫱ホ౯ᶵᵓࡀᨭ࡛ࡁࡿᛮࢃࢀ ࡿࡇࢆୗグࡼࡾᩍ࠼࡚ࡃࡔࡉ࠸ࠋ ᭱ᚋࡢタၥࡋ࡚ࠊᏛෆࡢ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯άື࠾࠸࡚ホ౯ᶵᵓࡀᨭ࡛ࡁࡿࡇࡘ ࠸࡚ఛࡗࡓࡇࢁࠊࠕ᪂ホ౯ᇶ‽ࡘ࠸࡚ࡢゎㄝࠖࡀ 258 ᰯ୰ 224 ᰯ(86.8%)ࠊࠕศ㔝ู ホ౯ࡘ࠸࡚ࡢሗⓎಙࠖࡀ 92 ᰯ(35.7%)ࠊࠕㄆドホ౯ไᗘࡘ࠸࡚ࡢሗⓎಙࠖࡀ 90 ᰯ(34.9%)ࠊࠕ㐣ཤࡢホ౯ࡘ࠸࡚ࡢሗⓎಙࠖࡀ 75 ᰯ(29.1%)ࠊࠕ⫋ဨ◊ಟࡢ୍⎔ࡋ࡚ ࡢ㈗Ꮫ⫋ဨࡢホ౯ᶵᵓࡢཷධࢀࠖࡀ 36 ᰯ(14.0%)ࠊࠕ▷ᮇᏛホ౯ࡘ࠸࡚ࡢሗⓎ ಙࠖ13 ᰯ(5.0)ࠊࠕ≉࡞ࡋࠖࡀ 5 ᰯ(1.9%)࡛࠶ࡗࡓࠋ ᭱ࡶᅇ⟅ࡀከࡗࡓࠕ᪂ホ౯ᇶ‽ࡘ࠸࡚ࡢゎㄝࠖࡘ࠸࡚ࡣࠊᖹᡂ 24(2012)ᖺ 1 ᭶ 4 ሙ࡛ㄝ᫂ࢆ⾜࠸ከࡃࡢ᪉ࡈฟᖍ࠸ࡓࡔ࠸ࡓࠋᚋࡢㄆドホ౯ࡢ‽ഛྥࡅ࡚ࡣᚲ せᛂࡌ࡚ಶูᑐᛂࡶྍ⬟࡞ࡢ࡛ࠊࡈ౫㢗࠸ࡓࡔࡁࡓ࠸ࠋ ࡑࡢࠊሗⓎಙࡘ࠸࡚ࡣࠊ⌧ᅾࠊ࣮࣒࣮࣍࣌ࢪࡸᶵ㛵ㄅࠕPeeRࠖࢆ୰ᚰ⾜ࡗ࡚࠸ ࡿࡀࠊࡼࡾ୍ᒙࡢᐇࡀᚲせ࡛࠶ࡿ⪃࠼ࡿࠋ 62 㻌 ᅇ⟅ᩘ㻌 㻌 䐟᪂ホ౯ᇶ‽䛻䛴䛔䛶䛾ゎㄝ㻌 ᅇ⟅ẚ㻌 㻞㻞㻠㻌 㻤㻢㻚㻤㻑㻌 㻌 䐠㐣ཤ䛾ホ౯䛻䛴䛔䛶䛾ሗⓎಙ㻌 㻣㻡㻌 㻞㻥㻚㻝㻑㻌 㻌 䐡▷ᮇᏛホ౯䛻䛴䛔䛶䛾ሗⓎಙ㻌 㻝㻟㻌 㻡㻚㻜㻑㻌 㻌 䐢ศ㔝ูホ౯䛻䛴䛔䛶䛾ሗⓎಙ㻌 㻥㻞㻌 㻟㻡㻚㻣㻑㻌 㻌 䐣⫋ဨ◊ಟ䛾୍⎔䛸䛧䛶䛾㈗Ꮫ⫋ဨ䛾ホ౯ᶵᵓ䜈䛾ཷධ䜜㻌 㻟㻢㻌 㻝㻠㻚㻜㻑㻌 㻌 䐤ㄆドホ౯ไᗘ䛻䛴䛔䛶䛾ሗⓎಙ㻌 㻥㻜㻌 㻟㻠㻚㻥㻑㻌 㻡㻌 㻝㻚㻥㻑㻌 㻌 䐥≉䛻䛺䛧㻌 ϮϱϬ ϮϮϰ ϮϬϬ ϭϱϬ ϭϬϬ ϵϮ ϳϱ ϵϬ ϯϲ ϱϬ ϭϯ ϱ Ϭ 䐟 䐠 䐡 䐢 䐣 䐤 䐥 ⥲ᣓ ࠕཷᑂᏛࡢᇶᮏሗࡘ࠸࡚ࠖࡣࠊタ❧ẕయࡢ㛵㐃ࡶ࠶ࡾࠊ᪥ᮏ⚾❧Ꮫ༠ࡢຍ ┕ᰯᏛࡀከࡃࡢྜࢆ༨ࡵࡓࠋࡲࡓࠊࡑࡢ㛵ಀࡶ࠶ࡾࠊࡰᅜࡢᏛࡽࡢཷᑂࡀ࠶ ࡗࡓࠋ Ꮫࡢつᶍࡘ࠸࡚ࡣࠊᏛ㒊ᩘཬࡧᐜᐃဨᩘࡽุ᩿ࡍࡿᑠつᶍࡽ୰つᶍࡢᏛ ࡀከࡃࢆ༨ࡵࡓࠋ Ꮫࡢタ⨨ᖺᗘࡘ࠸࡚ࡣࠊ10 ᖺ༢ࡈ୍ᐃࡢᏛᩘࡀཷᑂࡋࡓ༳㇟ࡀ࠶ࡿࡀࠊタ ❧ࡽ 20 ᖺ௨ෆࡢᏛࡀ 44.9%࡛⣙༙ᩘࢆ༨ࡵࡓࠋẚ㍑ⓗ᪂ࡋ࠸Ꮫࡀከࡃཷᑂࡋ࡚࠸ ࡿࡇࡶ᪥ᮏ⚾❧Ꮫ༠ࢆタ❧ẕయࡍࡿᙜᶵᵓࡢ≉㛗࡛࠶ࡿࠋ タ⨨Ꮫ㒊⣔⤫ࡘ࠸࡚ࡣࠊᏛタ⨨ᇶ‽࠶ࡿࠕᏛ㒊ࡢ✀㢮ࠖࢆ♧ࡋࠊヱᙜࡍࡿ⣔⤫ࢆ 㑅ᢥࡍࡿᙧᘧࢆࡗࡓࡀࠊᩘ್ᕪࡀ࠶ࡿࡶࡢࡢ࡚ࡢ⣔⤫ࡀᙜ࡚ࡣࡲࡗࡓࠋࠕᩍ⫱Ꮫ࣭ ಖ⫱Ꮫ㛵ಀࠖࡀከ࠸ࡇࠊᰤ㣴⣔ࡢᏛࡀከࡃཷᑂࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࡇࡶᙜᶵᵓࡢ≉㛗࡛࠶ࡿࠋ ࠕ๓ᅇࡢㄆドホ౯ཷᑂᚋࡘ࠸࡚ࠖࡣࠊࢇࡢᏛ࡛ㄆドホ౯ࡢཷᑂࡀᏛᨵ㠉ࡢ ᙺ❧ࡗࡓ࠸࠺ᅇ⟅ࡀ࠶ࡗࡓࠋᣦࡢෆᐜࡸཷᑂࡋࡓᖺᗘࡼࡿᕪࡀ࠶ࡿࡶࡢࡢከࡃࡢ Ꮫࡀ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯ࢆ⾜࠸ࠊᨵၿྥࡅ࡚ྲྀ⤌ࡳࡀ㐍ࢇ࡛࠸ࡿࡇࡶ☜ㄆ࡛ࡁࡓࠋἲᚊ ᐃࡵࡽࢀࡓホ౯࡛࠶ࡿࡶ㛵ࢃࡽࡎࠊ☜ᐇᏛᨵ㠉ᨭ⤖ࡧࡘ࠸࡚࠾ࡾࠊㄆドホ౯ ࡼࡗ୍࡚ᐃࡢᡂᯝࡀୖࡀࡗ࡚࠸ࡿࡇࡀ☜ㄆ࡛ࡁࡓࠋ ⮬ᕫホ౯ሗ࿌᭩ࡸホ౯⤖ᯝࡢබ⾲ࡘ࠸࡚ࡣࠊ࣮࣒࣮࣍࣌ࢪ࡛ࡢබ⾲ࡀὶ࡛࠶ࡗࡓࠋ ᩍ⫋ဨࠊᅾᏛ⏕ࠊಖㆤ⪅࡞ࢫࢸ࣮ࢡ࣍ࣝࢲ࣮ࡢㄝ᫂᪉ἲࡣ᭷↓ࡶྵࡵ࡚ࡉࡲࡊࡲ࡛࠶ ࡗࡓࠋ㡪ࡘ࠸࡚ࡣࠊࢿ࢞ࢸࣈ࡞⤖ᯝࡢ㡪ࡣ࠶ࡿࡀࠊඃࢀࡓྲྀ⤌ࡳ࡞ࡣ㡪 ࡣ࠶ࡲࡾ࡞࠸ࡢࡇ࡛࠶ࡗࡓࡀࠊࡇࡢⅬࡘ࠸࡚ࡣࠊᚋࠊㄆドホ౯⮬యࡢㄆ▱ᗘࡀୖ 63 ࡀࢀࡤࠊኚࡀぢࡽࢀࡿ⪃࠼ࡿࠋ ࠕᏛෆࡢ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯ཬࡧḟᅇࡢㄆドホ౯ཷᑂࡘ࠸࡚ࠖࠊ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯ࢆᐇࡍ ࡿ⌮⏤ࡋ࡚ࠕᏛࡢᨵၿ࣭ᨵ㠉ᙺ❧࡚ࡿࡓࡵࠖࡀ᭱ࡶከࡃ㑅ᢥࡉࢀࡓࠋࡇࢀࡣ๓㏙ࡢ ࠾ࡾࠊᐇ㝿ᨵၿ⤖ࡧࡘ࠸ࡓ⤖ᯝࡽࡇࡢᅇ⟅ࡀ㑅ᢥࡉࢀࡓ᥎ ࡉࢀࡿࠋࡲࡓࠊࠕᏛ ෆ࡛つᐃࡉࢀ࡚࠸ࡿࡓࡵࠖ࠸࠺ᅇ⟅ࡘ࠸࡚ࡣࠊከࡃࡢᏛࡀㄆドホ౯ཷᑂేࡏ࡚ Ꮫෆつᐃࢆᩚഛࡋࡓࡇࡶ࠶ࡗ࡚ከࡃ㑅ᢥࡉࢀ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯ᐇࡢ࿘ᮇㄆドホ౯ཷᑂࡢ࿘ᮇࡘ࠸࡚ࡣࠊ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯ࢆẖᖺᐇ ࡍࡿᏛࡀ 4 ㏆ࡃ࠶ࡗࡓࠋࠕẖᖺࡢᐇ࡛ࡣࡁ࡞ኚࡀぢࡽࢀ࡞࠸ࠖࠕホ౯⑂ࢀ ࡘ࡞ࡀࡿࠖ࡞ࡢពぢࡶ࠶ࡿ࡞ࠊᏛ࠾ࡅࡿ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯άືࡀᐃ╔ࡋ࡚ࡁࡓ⪃ ࠼ࡽࢀࡿࠋࡲࡓࠊㄆドホ౯ཷᑂࡢ࿘ᮇࡘ࠸࡚ࡣࠊㄆドホ౯ࡣᏛᰯᩍ⫱ἲࠕ7 ᖺ௨ෆࡈ ࠖつᐃࡉࢀ࡚࠸ࡿࡇࡶ࠶ࡾࠊㄆドホ౯ཷᑂࡢ࿘ᮇࡀỴࡲࡗ࡚࠸ࡿᏛࡢ 9 ㏆ࡃࡀ ࠕ7 ᖺࡈཷᑂࡍࡿࠖᅇ⟅ࡋࡓࠋ ㄆドホ౯ᶵ㛵ࢆỴᐃࡍࡿ㝿ඃඛࡍࡿ㡯ࡘ࠸࡚ࠊࠕホ౯ᇶ‽ࠖࡸࠕホ౯ࡢࣉࣟࢭࢫࠖ ࢆ㔜どࡍࡿࡢᅇ⟅ࡀከ࠸࡞ࠊᖹᡂ 24(2012)ᖺᗘ௨㝆ࡢㄆドホ౯ࡢཷᑂࡘ࠸࡚ࡣ 8 ௨ୖࡢᏛࡀᘬ⥆ࡁᙜᶵᵓ࡛ཷᑂࡍࡿࡇࡀỴᐃࡋ࡚࠸ࡿᅇ⟅ࡀ࠶ࡗࡓࠋᙜᶵᵓ࡛ࡣᖹ ᡂ 24(2012)ᖺᗘࡽホ౯ᇶ‽࡞ࡀኚ᭦ࡍࡿࡇࡶ࠶ࡾࠊ⥅⥆ⓗ࡞ሗࢆⓎಙࡋ࡚࠸ࡃᚲ せࡀ࠶ࡿࠋ ࠕ▷ᮇᏛࡢㄆドホ౯ࡘ࠸࡚ࠖࠊ㐣ᖺᗘཷᑂᏛࡢ⣙ 5 ࡀྠ୍ἲேෆ▷ᮇᏛࢆ タ⨨ࡋ࡚࠸ࡓࠋࡑࡢ࠺ࡕ 21 ᰯ(16.2%)ࡀᙜᶵᵓࡢ▷ᮇᏛᶵ㛵ูㄆドホ౯ࡢཷᑂࢆ᳨ウࡋ ࡚࠸ࡿ࠸࠺ᅇ⟅࡛࠶ࡗࡓࠋ ▷ᮇᏛࡢㄆドホ౯ᶵ㛵ࢆỴᐃࡍࡿ㝿ඃඛࡍࡿ㡯ࡘ࠸࡚ࡣࠊᅇࡢㄪᰝ࡛ࡣ☜ㄆ ࡛ࡁ࡚࠸࡞࠸ࡀࠊᏛ࡛ᅇ⟅ࡀከࡗࡓࠕホ౯ᇶ‽ࠖࡸࠕホ౯ࡢࣉࣟࢭࢫࠖຍ࠼ࠊᙜᶵ ᵓ࡛▷ᮇᏛᶵ㛵ูㄆドホ౯ࢆཷᑂࡍࡿࡇࡢ≉㛗࡞ࡶⓎಙࡋ࡚࠸࡞ࡅࢀࡤ࡞ࡽ࡞࠸ࠋ ࠕ᪥ᮏ㧗➼ᩍ⫱ホ౯ᶵᵓᑐࡋ࡚ࡢࡈពぢࠖࡘ࠸࡚ࠊࠕㄆ▱ᗘࡸ♫ⓗᆅ㸦ࢫࢸ࣮ ࢱࢫ㸧ࡢྥୖࠖཬࡧࠕᅜෆ࠾ࡅࡿࡢホ౯ᶵ㛵ࡢ㐃ᦠࠖࡘ࠸࡚ࡣࠊᏛᶵ㛵ูㄆド ホ౯ࢆᐇࡍࡿබ┈㈈ᅋἲேᏛᇶ‽༠ࡸ⊂❧⾜ᨻἲேᏛホ౯࣭Ꮫᤵᶵᵓẚ ࢀࡤࠊṔྐࡀὸ࠸ࡓࡵㄆ▱ᗘ࡞ࡶప࠸ࡇࡀ⪃࠼ࡽࢀࡿࠋࡲࡓࠊࡢホ౯ᶵ㛵࡛ࡣᖹᡂ 23(2011)ᖺᗘࡽ᪂ࡋ࠸ᇶ‽ࢆᑟධࡍࡿ࡞ࡢືࡁࡀ࠶ࡗࡓࡀࠊホ౯ᶵᵓ࡛ࡣᖹᡂ 24(20 12)ᖺᗘࡽ᪂ࡋ࠸ホ౯ᇶ‽࡛ㄆドホ౯ࢆᐇࡍࡿࠋᐇᙜࡓࡗ࡚ࡣࠊホ౯ᶵᵓࡢ≉㛗ࢆ ⏕ࡋ࡞ࡀࡽࡼࡾᐈほⓗ࡞ホ౯ࢆᐇࡋ࡚࠸ࡃࡓࡵࠊࡢホ౯ᅋయࡢ㐃ᦠࢆᅗࡿࡇࡀ ྍḞ࡛࠶ࡿ⪃࠼࡚࠸ࡿࠋᚋࡣᙜᶵᵓ༢⊂࡛ࡢㄆ▱ᗘୖ᪼ࡶ᳨ウࡋࡘࡘࠊࡢホ౯ᅋ యࡢ㐃ᦠࢆᅗࡾࠊㄆドホ౯ไᗘ⮬యࡢㄆ▱ᗘୖ᪼ࢆᅗࡗ࡚࠸ࡁࡓ࠸ࠋ ࠕᾏእࡢホ౯ᶵ㛵ࡢ㐃ᦠࠖࠕᅜ㝿ⓗᶆ‽ࢆྲྀධࢀࡓホ౯ᇶ‽ࡢタᐃࠖࡘ࠸࡚ࡣࠊᮇ ᚅ್ࡣ㧗ࡃ࡞ࡗࡓࠋࡋࡋ࡞ࡀࡽࠊᙜᶵᵓࡢホ౯ࢩࢫࢸ࣒ࡣ࣓ࣜ࢝ࢆ୰ᚰࡍࡿᾏእ ࡢホ౯ᶵ㛵ࡢホ౯ࢩࢫࢸ࣒ࢆཧ⪃ࡋࠊᵓ⠏ࡋ࡚ࡁࡓࠋᖹᡂ 24(2012)ᖺᗘࡢㄆドホ౯ᐇ ⥘ࡢᨵゞࡶᾏእࡢホ౯ᶵ㛵ࡢㄪᰝ◊✲ᇶ࡙࠸࡚࠸ࡿࠋࡲࡓࠊᅜ㝿ⓗ࡞ホ౯ᅋయࡶຍ ┕ࡋ࡚࠾ࡾࠊᚋࡶᾏእࡢホ౯ᶵ㛵ࡢㄪᰝ◊✲ࢆ⾜࠸ࠊᙜᶵᵓࡢㄆドホ౯⏕ࡋ࡚࠸ࡁ ࡓ࠸ࠋ ࠕ⚾Ꮫ≉ࡋࡓホ౯ᇶ‽ࡢタᐃࠖࡘ࠸࡚ࡣࠊ⌧≧ࡣ⚾Ꮫ≉ࡋࡓホ౯ᇶ‽࡞ࡗ ࡚࠸ࡿࢃࡅ࡛ࡣ࡞࠸ࡢ࡛ࠊࡼࡾ⚾Ꮫ≉ࡋࡓホ౯ᇶ‽ࢆタᐃࡋ࡚࠸ࡃ࠺ࡘ࠸࡚ 64 ࡣ᳨ウࡀᚲせ࡛࠶ࡿࠋ ࠕಶᛶ࣭ᆅᇦ࣭タ⨨Ꮫၥ⣔⤫ࢆ⪃៖ࡋࡓᐃᛶⓗ࡞ุ᩿ࠖࡘ࠸࡚ࡣࠊホ౯ᶵᵓ࡛ࡣホ౯ ࡢᇶᮏ᪉㔪ࡋ࡚ࠊࠕᐃᛶⓗホ౯ࢆ㔜どࡋࡓホ౯ࠖࢆ࠺ࡓࡗ࡚࠸ࡿࡓࡵࠊタ❧ࡽព㆑ ࢆࡋ࡚ྲྀ⤌ࢇ࡛ࡁࡓࡀࠊࡑࡢᐇ㊶ࢆᮇᚅࡍࡿᩘ್ุ᩿࡛ࡁࡿࠋᚋࡶᮇᚅῧ࠼ࡿࡼ ࠺ྲྀ⤌ࢇ࡛࠸ࡁࡓ࠸ࠋ ࠕ㐣ཤࡢᣦᇶ࡙ࡃබᖹ࡞ุ᩿ࠖࡘ࠸࡚ࠊホ౯ᶵᵓ࡛ࡣ㐣ཤࡢᣦෆᐜࢆ㋃ࡲ࠼ࡘ ࡘࠊホ౯ᐇᖺᗘࡢἲᨵṇࡸ⎔ቃኚ࡞ࢆ⪃៖ࡋࠊ᭱⤊ⓗ࡞ホ౯⤖ᯝࢆᑟࡁฟࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ ᚋࡶࡇࡢᡭ⥆ࡁࢆ⥔ᣢࡋࠊබᖹ࡞ホ౯ࡀ࡛ࡁࡿࡼ࠺ྲྀ⤌ࡳࡓ࠸ࠋ ࠕࣆ࣭ࣞࣅ࣮ࣗࢆព㆑ࡋࡓホ౯ဨ◊ಟࡢᐇࠖࡘ࠸࡚ࠊホ౯ဨࡢ◊ಟࡘ࠸࡚ࡣࠊ Ꮫホ౯ุᐃጤဨࡢᑠጤဨ࡛࠶ࡿホ౯ဨ㣴ᡂ᳨ウጤဨ࠾࠸࡚ࠊホ౯ဨࡢ࣐ࢽࣗ ࡛ࣝ࠶ࡿࠕホ౯ࡢ࡚ࡧࡁࠖࡸᢸᙜホ౯ဨࢭ࣑ࢼ࣮ࡢࣉࣟࢢ࣒ࣛࡘ࠸᳨࡚ウࢆࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ ➨ 1 ࢧࢡࣝ࠾࠸࡚ࡣᚋ༙ྥࡅᐇࢆᅗࡗ࡚ࡁࡓࡀࠊホ౯ᇶ‽ࡀ᪂ࡋࡃ࡞ࡗࡓࡓࡵࠊ ᨵࡵ᳨࡚ウࢆ⾜࠸ホ౯ဨ◊ಟࡢᐇࢆᅗࡗ࡚࠸ࡁࡓ࠸ࠋ ࠕཷᑂࡿົ㈇ᢸࡢ㍍ῶࠖࡘ࠸࡚ࡣࠊ㝈ࡽࢀࡓ㛫ࡢ୰࡛ホ౯ࢆཷࡅࡿഃホ ౯ࡍࡿഃࡢ᪉ࡀ⣡ᚓࡢ࠸ࡃホ౯ࢆ⾜࠺ࡓࡵࡣࠊ⡆␎࡛ࡁ࡞࠸㒊ศࡶ࠶ࡿࡀࠊཷᑂ Ꮫࡽࡢពぢࢆఛ࠸࡞ࡀࡽ⡆␎ࡢྍ⬟ᛶࢆ᳨ウࡋࡓ࠸ࠋ ࠕᐇᆅㄪᰝࡢ⡆⣲ࠖᑐࡍࡿᮇᚅ್ࡣ㧗ࡃ࡞࠸ࠋᐇᆅㄪᰝࡢෆᐜࡢᐇࡘ࠸࡚ࡣホ ౯ဨࡽࡶせᮃࡀ㧗࠸㡯࡛࠶ࡾࠊ༑ศ࡞㛫ࢆࡅࡿࡇࡣホ౯ࢆཷࡅࡿഃホ౯ࡍࡿ ഃࡢ᪉ࡗ࡚ᮃࡲࢀ࡚࠸ࡿࡇࡀ࠺ࡀ࠼ࡿࠋ ࠕࣇࢱ࣮ࢧ࣮ࣅࢫࡢᐇࠖࡘ࠸࡚ࠊ ㄆドホ౯ཷᑂᚋࡢࣇࢱ࣮ࢧ࣮ࣅࢫࡘ࠸࡚ࡣࠊ ➨ 1 ࢧࢡࣝ࠾࠸࡚ࡣ≉ู࡞ࡇࢆᐇࡋ࡚࠸࡞࠸ࠋࡢ㡯┠ẚ㍑ࡋ࡚Ꮫࡽࡢᮇ ᚅ್ࡣ㧗ࡃ࡞࠸ࡀࠊࡇࡢᗘࡢㄪᰝ⤖ᯝࡢබ⾲࡞ࡶࣇࢱ࣮ࢧ࣮ࣅࢫᤊ࠼ࠊཷᑂᏛ ࡗ࡚ཧ⪃࡞ࡿሗࢆ⥅⥆ⓗⓎಙࡋ࡚࠸ࡁࡓ࠸ࠋ ࠕ࣮࣒࣮࣍࣌ࢪࡸᶵ㛵ㄅࡢᐇࠖࡘ࠸࡚ࠊࡢ㡯┠ẚ㍑ࡋ࡚ࡶᏛࡽࡢᮇᚅ್ࡣ 㧗ࡃ࡞࠸ࡀࠊሗබ㛤ࡢほⅬࡽࡶሗⓎಙࡢሙࡋ࡚ࡼࡾᐇࡉࡏ࡚࠸ࡃᚲせࡀ࠶ࡿࠋ ࡑࡢࠊホ౯ᶵᵓᮇᚅࡍࡿྲྀ⤌ࡳࡸᨭ࡛ࡁࡿࡇࡘ࠸࡚ࡶࠊ࠸ࡓࡔ࠸ࡓពぢࡘ ࠸࡚ᚋࡢᴗࡢཧ⪃ࡉࡏ࡚࠸ࡓࡔࡁࠊ࡛ࡁࡿࡔࡅᮇᚅῧ࠼ࡿࡼ࠺ྲྀ⤌ࢇ࡛࠸ࡁࡓ࠸ࠋ 㻌 65 ཧ ⪃ ᖹᡂ 23 ᖺ 10 ᭶ 11 ᪥ ㄆドホ౯ࡈᢸᙜ⪅ྛ ᣏၨ ㈗Ꮫ࠾ࢀࡲࡋ࡚ࡣ┈ࠎࡈΎᰤࡢࡇ࠾ࡧ⏦ࡋୖࡆࡲࡍࠋ ᖹ⣲ࡣᙜᶵᵓࡢᴗάືࡈ⌮ゎࢆ㈷ࡾཌࡃᚚ♩⏦ࡋୖࡆࡲࡍࠋ ࡉ࡚ࠊㄆドホ౯ไᗘⓎ㊊ࡽ᭱ึࡢ 7 ᖺ㛫ࢆ⤊࠼ࠊᖹᡂ 24 ᖺᗘ௨㝆ࡢㄆドホ౯ࢆᐇࡍ ࡿᙜࡓࡾࠊᙜᶵᵓࡢタ❧㊃᪨ࡈࡊ࠸ࡲࡍࠕホ౯➼ࢆ㏻ࡌྛᏛࡢᨵ㠉࣭ᨵၿࢆᨭࡍ ࡿࡇࡋࠊࡶࡗ࡚⚾❧Ꮫ➼ࡢⓎᒎ࣭ᐇᐤࡍࡿࠖࡇࡘ࠸࡚㐩ᡂ≧ἣࢆᅗࡿࡓ ࡵࠕ㐣ᖺᗘཷᑂᏛᑐࡍࡿㄪᰝࠖࢆᐇࡍࡿࡇ࠸ࡓࡋࡲࡋࡓࠋ ࡘࡁࡲࡋ࡚ࡣࠊࣥࢣ࣮ࢺࡢᅇ⟅ࣇ࢛࣮࣒ࢆᮏ࣓࣮࡚ࣝ࠾㏦ࡾ࠸ࡓࡋࡲࡍࡢ࡛ࠊࡈ☜ㄆ ࡃࡔࡉ࠸ࠋ ᮏ࣓࣮ࣝࡣࠊ㐣᪥ᐇ࠸ࡓࡋࡲࡋࡓࠕᏛᶵ㛵ูㄆドホ౯ࡢ⏦ㄳ㛵ࡍࡿពྥㄪᰝࠖ࠾ ࡁࡲࡋ࡚ᢸᙜ⪅ࡋ࡚ࡈグධ࠸ࡓࡔ࠸ࡓ᪉࠾㏦ࡾࡋ࡚࠾ࡾࡲࡍࠋ ࡞࠾ࠊᅇ⟅ࡢෆᐜࡘࡁࡲࡋ࡚ࠊ☜ㄆࡢࡈ㐃⤡ࢆࡉࡏ࡚࠸ࡓࡔࡃሙྜࡀࡈࡊ࠸ࡲࡍࡢ࡛࠶ ࡽࡌࡵࡈᢎ▱࠾ࡁࡃࡔࡉ࠸ࠋ Ꮫົࡈከᛁࡢᢡㄔᜍ⦰Ꮡࡌࡲࡍࡀࠊᙜᶵᵓࡢᚋࡢάື᪉㔪᳨ウࡢࡓࡵࡢㄪᰝ࡛࠶ࡿ ࡇࢆࡈ⌮ゎ࠸ࡓࡔࡁࠊᖹᡂ 23 ᖺ 11 ᭶ 18 ᪥㸦㔠㸧ࡲ࡛ࡈᅇ⟅ࡃࡔࡉ࠸ࡲࡍࡼ࠺࠾㢪 ࠸⏦ࡋୖࡆࡲࡍࠋ ᩗල ㈈ᅋἲே ᪥ᮏ㧗➼ᩍ⫱ホ౯ᶵᵓ ⌮㛗 బ⸨ Ⓩᚿ㑻 66 ᇶᮏሗ䛻䛴䛔䛶䛚ఛ䛔䛧䜎䛩䚹㻌 タၥ㻔㻝㻕㻌 Ꮫྡ㻌 タၥ㻔㻞㻕㻌 Ꮫ䛾タ⨨ᖺᗘ㻌 タၥ㻔㻟㻕㻌 ᡤᅾᆅ䠄㒔㐨ᗓ┴䠅䠄ᮏ㒊ᡤᅾᆅ䠅㻌 タ⨨Ꮫ㒊䛾✀㢮䠄タ⨨Ꮫ㒊䛩䜉䛶䛻䛴䛔䛶㑅ᢥ䠅㻌 㻌 䐟ᩥᏛ㛵ಀ㻌 㻌 䐠ᩍ⫱Ꮫ䞉ಖ⫱Ꮫ㛵ಀ㻌 㻌 䐡ἲᏛ㛵ಀ㻌 㻌 䐢⤒῭Ꮫ㛵ಀ㻌 㻌 䐣♫Ꮫ䞉♫⚟♴Ꮫ㛵ಀ㻌 㻌 䐤⌮Ꮫ㛵ಀ㻌 㻌 䐥ᕤᏛ㛵ಀ㻌 㻌 䐦㎰Ꮫ㛵ಀ㻌 タၥ㻔㻠㻕㻌 㻌 䐧⋇་Ꮫ㛵ಀ㻌 㻌 䐨⸆Ꮫ㛵ಀ㻌 㻌 䐩ᐙᨻ㛵ಀ㻌 㻌 䐪⨾⾡㛵ಀ㻌 㻌 䐫㡢ᴦ㛵ಀ㻌 㻌 䐬య⫱㛵ಀ㻌 㻌 䐭ಖ⾨⏕Ꮫ䠄┳ㆤᏛ䠅㛵ಀ㻌 㻌 䐮ಖ⾨⏕Ꮫ䠄┳ㆤᏛ㝖䛟䠅㛵ಀ㻌 㻌 䐯་Ꮫ㛵ಀ㻌 㻌 䐰ṑᏛ㛵ಀ㻌 Ꮫ䛾つᶍ㻌 䈜ᖹᡂ 㻞㻟 ᖺ 㻡 ᭶ 㻝 ᪥Ⅼ䠄ເ㞟Ṇ䛾Ꮫ㒊䞉◊✲⛉䛿ྵ䜎䛺䛔䠅㻌 タၥ㻔㻡㻕㻌 㻌 Ꮫ㒊ᩘ䠄㻌 㻌 㻌 䠅㻌 㻌 ◊✲⛉ᩘ䠄㻌 㻌 㻌 䠅㻌 ᐜᐃဨ䛸ᅾ⡠Ꮫ⏕ᩘ㻌 タၥ㻔㻢㻕㻌 㻌 Ꮫ㒊䛾ᐜᐃဨ䠄㻌 㻌 㻌 㻌 㻌 ே䠅䚸Ꮫ㒊䛾ᅾ⡠Ꮫ⏕ᩘ䠄㻌 㻌 㻌 㻌 㻌 ே䠅㻌 㻌 ◊✲⛉䛾ᐜᐃဨ䠄㻌 㻌 㻌 㻌 㻌 ே䠅䚸◊✲⛉䛾ᅾ⡠Ꮫ⏕ᩘ䠄㻌 㻌 㻌 㻌 㻌 ே䠅㻌 ௨ୗ䛾⚾Ꮫ㛵ಀᅋయ䛷㻌 ᡤᒓ䛧䛶䛔䜛ᅋయ䛜䛒䜜䜀ᩍ䛘䛶䛟䛰䛥䛔䚹㻌 㻌 䐟᪥ᮏ⚾❧Ꮫ༠㻌 タၥ㻔㻣㻕㻌 㻌 䐠♫ᅋἲே᪥ᮏ⚾❧Ꮫ㐃┕㻌 㻌 䐡᪥ᮏ⚾❧Ꮫ⯆༠㻌 㻌 䐢ᡤᒓ䛧䛶䛔䛺䛔㻌 ๓ᅇ䛾ㄆドホ౯ཷᑂᚋ䛻䛴䛔䛶䛚ఛ䛔䛧䜎䛩䚹㻌 ㄆドホ౯䛾ཷᑂ䛿䚸Ꮫ䛾ᨵ㠉䛾ᙺ䛻❧䛱䜎䛧䛯䛛䚹㻌 タၥ㻔㻤㻕㻌 㻌 䐟䛿䛔㻌 㻌 䐠䛔䛔䛘㻌 ᣦ㡯䜢䛹䛾䜘䛖䛻Ꮫෆ䛻࿘▱䛧䜎䛧䛯䛛䚹䠄ヱᙜ䛩䜛䜒䛾䜢䛩䜉䛶㑅ᢥ䠅㻌 㻌 䐟ㄪᰝሗ࿌᭩䜢䝩䞊䝮䝨䞊䝆䛷බ㛤䛧䛯䚹㻌 㻌 䐠ㄪᰝሗ࿌᭩䜢Ꮫෆ㛵ಀ⪅䠄ᩍ⫋ဨ➼䠅䛻㓄ᕸ䛧䛯䚹㻌 タၥ㻔㻥㻕㻌 㻌 䐡Ꮫෆ䛻ㄪᰝሗ࿌᭩䛾㜀ぴሙᡤ䜢タ䛡䛯䚹㻌 㻌 䐢ᗈሗㄅ䜔䝩䞊䝮䝨䞊䝆➼䛻ᣦ㡯䛾ᴫせ䜢ᥖ㍕䛧䛯䚹㻌 㻌 䐣࿘▱䛧䛶䛔䛺䛔䚹㻌 㻌 䐤䛭䛾㻌 タၥ㻔㻝㻜㻕㻌 タၥ㻔㻥㻕䛷䐤䛭䛾䛸ᅇ⟅䛧䛯ሙྜ䛿䚸䛭䛾ෆᐜ䜢ලయⓗ䛻ᩍ䛘䛶䛟䛰䛥䛔䚹㻌 ㄆドホ౯䛻䛚䛔䛶㈗Ꮫ䛜సᡂ䛧䛯⮬ᕫホ౯ሗ࿌᭩䛾䛂ᨵၿ䞉ྥୖ᪉⟇䛃䛻ᣲ䛢䛯㡯䜢ᨵၿ䛧䜎 䛧䛯䛛䚹㻌 タၥ㻔㻝㻝㻕㻌 㻌 䐟䛶ᨵၿ䛧䛯㻌 㻌 䐠୍㒊ᨵၿ䛧䛯㻌 㻌 䐡ᨵၿ䛧䛶䛔䛺䛔㻌 ㄆドホ౯䛻䛚䛔䛶ᣦ䛥䜜䛯ᨵၿ㡯䛻䛴䛔䛶ᨵၿ䛧䜎䛧䛯䛛䚹㻌 㻌 䐟䛶ᨵၿ䛧䛯㻌 タၥ㻔㻝㻞㻕㻌 㻌 䐠୍㒊ᨵၿ䛧䛯㻌 㻌 䐡ᨵၿ䛧䛶䛔䛺䛔㻌 ๓ᅇ䛾ㄆドホ౯䛻䛚䛡䜛ᨵၿ㡯䛻䛴䛔䛶䛹䛾䜘䛖䛻ᨵၿ䛻ྲྀ⤌䜏䜎䛧䛯䛛䚹㻌 㻌 䐟Ꮫ㛗䛜୰ᚰ䛻䛺䛳䛶ᨵၿ䛧䛯䚹㻌 㻌 䐠ㄆドホ౯䛾⮬ᕫホ౯ᢸᙜ⪅䛜୰ᚰ䛻䛺䛳䛶ᨵၿ䛧䛯䚹㻌 タၥ㻔㻝㻟㻕㻌 㻌 䐡ㄆドホ౯䛾⮬ᕫⅬ᳨䞉ホ౯䛻㛵䜟䜛⤌⧊䛜୰ᚰ䛻䛺䛳䛶ᨵၿ䛧䛯䚹㻌 㻌 䐢᪂䛯䛻䛂ᨵၿ᳨ウጤဨ䛃䛾䜘䛖䛺⤌⧊䜢タ⨨䛧䛶ᨵၿ䛧䛯䚹㻌 㻌 䐣䛭䛾㻌 タၥ㻔㻝㻠㻕㻌 タၥ㻔㻝㻟㻕䛷䐣䛭䛾䛸ᅇ⟅䛧䛯ሙྜ䛿䚸䛭䛾ෆᐜ䜢ලయⓗ䛻ᩍ䛘䛶䛟䛰䛥䛔䚹㻌 ᣦ㡯䛾ᨵၿ≧ἣ䛻䛴䛔䛶ᩍ䛘䛶䛟䛰䛥䛔䚹䠄ヱᙜ䛩䜛䜒䛾䜢䛩䜉䛶㑅ᢥ䠅㻌 㻌 䐟බ⾲䛥䜜䛯ᨵၿ䜢せ䛩䜛Ⅼ䜢ᨵၿ䛧䛯䚹㻌 㻌 䐠Ꮫ䛾䜏䛻㏻▱䛥䜜䛯ᨵၿ䜢せ䛩䜛Ⅼ䜢ᨵၿ䛧䛯䚹㻌 タၥ㻔㻝㻡㻕㻌 㻌 䐡බ⾲䛥䜜䛯ཧ⪃ពぢ䜢ᨵၿ䛧䛯䚹㻌 㻌 䐢Ꮫ䛾䜏䛻㏻▱䛥䜜䛯ཧ⪃ពぢ䜢ᨵၿ䛧䛯䚹㻌 㻌 䐣䛭䛾㻌 タၥ㻔㻝㻢㻕㻌 タၥ㻔㻝㻡㻕䛷䐣䛭䛾䛸ᅇ⟅䛧䛯ሙྜ䛿䚸䛭䛾ෆᐜ䜢ලయⓗ䛻ᩍ䛘䛶䛟䛰䛥䛔䚹㻌 67 ๓ᅇ䛾ㄆドホ౯䛻䛚䛡䜛ᣦ㡯䜢ᨵၿ䛩䜛䛻䛒䛯䜚䚸㞀ᐖ䛻䛺䛳䛯䠄䛺䛳䛶䛔䜛䠅䜒䛾䛿䛒䜚䜎䛩 䛛䚹䠄ヱᙜ䛩䜛䜒䛾䜢䛩䜉䛶㑅ᢥ䠅㻌 㻌 䐟㞀ᐖ䛿䛺䛔㻌 㻌 㻌 䐠⌮䛾⌮ゎ䜔ᨭ㻌 㻌 䐡ᩍᤵ䛾⌮ゎ䜔ᨭ㻌 タၥ㻔㻝㻣㻕㻌 㻌 䐢ᩍဨ⤌⧊䛾⌮ゎ䜔ᨭ㻌 㻌 䐣ᩍဨ䛾ᴗົ㔞䛾ቑຍ㻌 㻌 䐤ົ⤌⧊䛾⌮ゎ䜔ᨭ㻌 㻌 䐥ົ⫋ဨ䛾ᴗົ㔞䛾ቑຍ㻌 㻌 䐦ᨵၿ䛻ᚲせ䛺ண⟬ᥐ⨨㻌 㻌 䐧䛭䛾㻌 タၥ㻔㻝㻤㻕㻌 タၥ㻔㻝㻣㻕䛷䐧䛭䛾䛸ᅇ⟅䛧䛯ሙྜ䛿䚸䛭䛾ෆᐜ䜢ලయⓗ䛻ᩍ䛘䛶䛟䛰䛥䛔䚹㻌 Ꮫ䛾ホ౯⤖ᯝ䜢☜ㄆ䛧ཧ⪃䛻䛧䜎䛧䛯䛛䚹䠄ヱᙜ䛩䜛䜒䛾䜢䛩䜉䛶㑅ᢥ䠅㻌 㻌 䐟ཧ⪃䛻䛧䛶䛔䛺䛔㻌 㻌 䐠⏦ㄳ๓䛻☜ㄆ䛧ཧ⪃䛻䛧䛯㻌 タၥ㻔㻝㻥㻕㻌 㻌 䐡⏦ㄳᚋ䡚ሗ࿌᭩ᥦฟ䜎䛷䛻☜ㄆ䛧ཧ⪃䛻䛧䛯㻌 㻌 䐢ሗ࿌᭩ᥦฟᚋ䡚ᐇᆅㄪᰝ䜎䛷䛻☜ㄆ䛧ཧ⪃䛻䛧䛯㻌 㻌 䐣ᐇᆅㄪᰝ⤊ᚋ䛻☜ㄆ䛧ཧ⪃䛻䛧䛯㻌 ㄆドホ౯䛾⤖ᯝ☜ᐃᚋ䚸⮬ᕫホ౯ሗ࿌᭩䜢䛹䛾䜘䛖䛻බ⾲䛧䜎䛧䛯䛛䚹䠄ヱᙜ䛩䜛䜒䛾䜢䛩䜉䛶㑅 ᢥ䠅㻌 㻌 䐟බ⾲䛧䛶䛔䛺䛔䚹㻌 㻌 䐠䝩䞊䝮䝨䞊䝆䛷බ㛤䛧䛯䚹㻌 タၥ㻔㻞㻜㻕㻌 㻌 䐡Ꮚ䛸䛧䛶ห⾜䛧䚸㛵ಀ⪅䛻㓄ᕸ䛧䛯䚹㻌 㻌 䐢ᗈሗㄅ䜔䝩䞊䝮䝨䞊䝆➼䛻ᴫせ䜢ᥖ㍕䛧䛯䚹㻌 㻌 䐣Ꮫෆ䛻㜀ぴሙᡤ䜢タ䛡䛯䚹㻌 㻌 䐤䛭䛾㻌 タၥ㻔㻞㻝㻕㻌 タၥ㻔㻞㻜㻕䛷䐤䛭䛾䛸ᅇ⟅䛧䛯ሙྜ䛿䚸䛭䛾ෆᐜ䜢ලయⓗ䛻ᩍ䛘䛶䛟䛰䛥䛔䚹㻌 ㄆドホ౯䛾⤖ᯝ䜢䝇䝔䞊䜽䝩䝹䝎䞊➼䛻ㄝ᫂䛧䜎䛧䛯䛛䚹䠄ヱᙜ䛩䜛䜒䛾䜢䛩䜉䛶㑅ᢥ䠅㻌 㻌 䐟ㄝ᫂䛧䛶䛔䛺䛔䚹㻌 㻌 䐠⌮➼䛷ᙺဨ䛻ㄝ᫂䛧䛯䚹㻌 㻌 䐡ᩍᤵ➼䛷ᩍ⫋ဨ䛻ㄝ᫂䛧䛯䚹㻌 タၥ㻔㻞㻞㻕㻌 㻌 䐢䜸䝸䜶䞁䝔䞊䝅䝵䞁➼䛷ᅾᏛ⏕䛻ㄝ᫂䛧䛯䚹㻌 㻌 䐣ಖㆤ⪅➼䛷ᅾᏛ⏕䛾ಖㆤ⪅䛻ㄝ᫂䛧䛯䚹㻌 㻌 䐤ධヨㄝ᫂➼䛷ධᏛᚿᮃ⪅䛻ㄝ᫂䛧䛯䚹㻌 㻌 䐥ㄝ᫂䜔㧗ᰯゼၥ➼䛷㧗ᰯᩍဨ䛻ㄝ᫂䛧䛯䚹㻌 㻌 䐦䛭䛾㻌 タၥ㻔㻞㻟㻕㻌 タၥ㻔㻞㻞㻕䛷䐦䛭䛾䛸ᅇ⟅䛧䛯ሙྜ䛿䚸䛭䛾ෆᐜ䜢ලయⓗ䛻ᩍ䛘䛶䛟䛰䛥䛔䚹㻌 ㄆドホ౯ཷᑂᚋ䛻⮬ᕫⅬ᳨䞉ホ౯䜢ᐇ䛧䛶䛔䜎䛩䛛䚹㻌 タၥ㻔㻞㻠㻕㻌 㻌 䐟䛿䛔㻌 㻌 䐠䛔䛔䛘㻌 Ꮫෆ䛾⮬ᕫⅬ᳨䞉ホ౯ཬ䜃ḟᅇ䛾ㄆドホ౯ཷᑂ䛻䛴䛔䛶䛚ఛ䛔䛧䜎䛩䚹㻌 ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨䞉ホ౯䜢ᐇ䛩䜛⌮⏤䜢㑅䜣䛷䛟䛰䛥䛔䚹䠄ヱᙜ䛩䜛䜒䛾䜢䛩䜉䛶㑅ᢥ䠅㻌 㻌 䐟ἲ௧䛷⩏ົ䛥䜜䛶䛔䜛䛯䜑㻌 㻌 䐠Ꮫෆ䛷つᐃ䛥䜜䛶䛔䜛䛯䜑㻌 タၥ㻔㻞㻡㻕㻌 㻌 䐡Ꮫෆ䛾άືෆᐜ䜢ᢕᥱ䛩䜛䛯䜑㻌 㻌 䐢Ꮫ䛾ᨵၿ䞉ᨵ㠉䛻ᙺ❧䛶䜛䛯䜑㻌 㻌 䐣⮬ᕫⅬ᳨䞉ホ౯䛾⤖ᯝ䜢䜒䛸䛻ㄆドホ౯䜢⏦ㄳ䛩䜛䛯䜑㻌 㻌 䐤䛭䛾㻌 タၥ㻔㻞㻢㻕㻌 タၥ㻔㻞㻡㻕䛷䐤䛭䛾䛸ᅇ⟅䛧䛯ሙྜ䛿䚸䛭䛾ෆᐜ䜢ලయⓗ䛻ᩍ䛘䛶䛟䛰䛥䛔䚹㻌 ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨䞉ホ౯䜢ఱᖺ䛤䛸䛻ᐇ䛩䜛䛛Ỵᐃ䛧䛶䛔䜎䛩䛛䚹㻌 㻌 䐟Ỵ䜎䛳䛶䛔䛺䛔㻌 タၥ㻔㻞㻣㻕㻌 㻌 䐠Ỵ䜎䛳䛶䛔䜛䠄ẖᖺ䠅㻌 㻌 䐡Ỵ䜎䛳䛶䛔䜛䠄ᩘᖺ䛤䛸䠅㻌 タၥ㻔㻞㻣㻕䛷䛂䐡䛃䛸ᅇ⟅䛧䛯ሙྜ䛿䚸⮬ᕫⅬ᳨䞉ホ౯䛿ఱᖺ䛤䛸䛻ᐇ䛧䛶䛔䜛䛛ᩍ䛘䛶䛟䛰䛥䛔䚹㻌 タၥ㻔㻞㻤㻕㻌 㻌 䠄㻌 㻌 㻌 䠅ᖺ䛤䛸㻌 㻌 㻌 68 タၥ㻔㻞㻥㻕㻌 タၥ㻔㻟㻜㻕㻌 タၥ㻔㻟㻝㻕㻌 タၥ㻔㻟㻞㻕㻌 タၥ㻔㻟㻟㻕㻌 タၥ㻔㻟㻠㻕㻌 タၥ㻔㻟㻡㻕㻌 タၥ㻔㻟㻢㻕㻌 タၥ㻔㻟㻣㻕㻌 タၥ㻔㻟㻤㻕㻌 タၥ㻔㻟㻥㻕㻌 タၥ㻔㻠㻜㻕㻌 タၥ㻔㻠㻝㻕㻌 タၥ㻔㻠㻞㻕㻌 ㄆドホ౯䜢ఱᖺ䛤䛸䛻ཷᑂ䛩䜛䛛Ỵᐃ䛧䛶䛔䜎䛩䛛䚹㻌 㻌 䐟Ỵ䜎䛳䛶䛔䛺䛔㻌 㻌 䐠Ỵ䜎䛳䛶䛔䜛㻌 タၥ㻔㻞㻥㻕䛷䛂䐠䛃䛸ᅇ⟅䛧䛯ሙྜ䛿䚸ㄆドホ౯䜢ఱᖺ䛤䛸䛻ཷᑂ䛩䜛ணᐃ䛛ᩍ䛘䛶䛟䛰䛥䛔䚹㻌 㻌 䠄㻌 㻌 㻌 䠅ᖺ䛤䛸㻌 ᪥ᖖⓗ䛻⮬ᕫⅬ᳨䞉ホ౯䜢ᐇ䛩䜛⤌⧊䞉㒊⨫䛿䛒䜚䜎䛩䛛䚹㻌 㻌 䐟ጤဨྡ䠄㻌 㻌 㻌 㻌 㻌 㻌 㻌 㻌 㻌 㻌 㻌 㻌 㻌 㻌 㻌 䠅㻌 㻌 䐠㒊⨫ྡ䠄㻌 㻌 㻌 㻌 㻌 㻌 㻌 㻌 㻌 㻌 㻌 㻌 㻌 㻌 㻌 䠅㻌 㻌 䐡䛭䛾䠄㻌 㻌 㻌 㻌 㻌 㻌 㻌 㻌 㻌 㻌 㻌 㻌 㻌 㻌 㻌 䠅㻌 Ꮫෆ䛻䛚䛡䜛⮬ᕫⅬ᳨䞉ホ౯䛾୰ᚰே≀䛿䛹䛺䛯䛷䛩䛛䚹㻌 㻌 䐟Ꮫ㛗㻌 㻌 䐠ົᒁ㛗㻌 㻌 䐡Ꮫ㒊㛗㻌 㻌 䐢⮬ᕫⅬ᳨䞉ホ౯䜢⾜䛖ጤဨ䛾㛗㻌 㻌 䐣⮬ᕫⅬ᳨䞉ホ౯䜢ྲྀ䜚䜎䛸䜑䜛㒊⨫䛾㛗㻌 㻌 䐤䛭䛾㻌 タၥ㻔㻟㻞㻕䛷䐤䛭䛾䛸ᅇ⟅䛧䛯ሙྜ䛿䚸䛭䛾ෆᐜ䜢ලయⓗ䛻ᩍ䛘䛶䛟䛰䛥䛔䚹㻌 ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨䞉ホ౯䛾䛯䜑䛾ᇶ‽䜔㡯┠䜢タᐃ䛩䜛䛻䛒䛯䜚䚸ཧ⪃䛻䛧䛶䛔䜛䜒䛾䛿䛒䜚䜎䛩䛛䚹䠄ヱᙜ 䛩䜛䜒䛾䜢䛩䜉䛶㑅ᢥ䠅㻌 㻌 䐟᪥ᮏ㧗➼ᩍ⫱ホ౯ᶵᵓ䛾ᇶ‽䜢ཧ⪃䛻䛧䛶䛔䜛䚹㻌 㻌 䐠Ꮫᇶ‽༠䛾Ⅼ᳨䞉ホ౯㡯┠䜢ཧ⪃䛻䛧䛶䛔䜛䚹㻌 㻌 䐡Ꮫホ౯䞉Ꮫᤵᶵᵓ䛾ᇶ‽䜢ཧ⪃䛻䛧䛶䛔䜛䚹㻌 㻌 䐢Ꮫ䛾ሗ࿌᭩䜢ཧ⪃䛻䛧䛶䛔䜛䚹㻌 㻌 䐣ཧ⪃䛻䛧䛶䛔䜛䜒䛾䛿≉䛻䛺䛔䚹㻌 㻌 䐤䛭䛾㻌 タၥ㻔㻟㻠㻕䛷䐤䛭䛾䛸ᅇ⟅䛧䛯ሙྜ䛿䚸䛭䛾ෆᐜ䜢ලయⓗ䛻ᩍ䛘䛶䛟䛰䛥䛔䚹㻌 ᪥ᮏ㧗➼ᩍ⫱ホ౯ᶵᵓ䛜ᖹᡂ 㻞㻠 ᖺᗘ䛛䜙ᐇ䛩䜛ㄆドホ౯䛾᪂䛧䛔ᇶ‽䜢䛤Ꮡ▱䛷䛩䛛䚹䠄ヱᙜ 䛩䜛䜒䛾䜢䛩䜉䛶㑅ᢥ䠅㻌 㻌 䐟▱䜙䛺䛔䚹㻌 㻌 㻌 䐠᪥ᮏ㧗➼ᩍ⫱ホ౯ᶵᵓദ䛾䝉䝭䝘䞊䛷▱䛳䛯䚹㻌 㻌 䐡᪥ᮏ㧗➼ᩍ⫱ホ౯ᶵᵓ䛾䝩䞊䝮䝨䞊䝆䛷▱䛳䛯䚹㻌 㻌 䐢᪥ᮏ㧗➼ᩍ⫱ホ౯ᶵᵓ䛾ᶵ㛵ㄅ䛂㻼㼑㼑㻾䛃䛷▱䛳䛯䚹㻌 㻌 䐣䛭䛾㻌 タၥ㻔㻟㻢㻕䛷䐤䛭䛾䛸ᅇ⟅䛧䛯ሙྜ䛿䚸䛭䛾ෆᐜ䜢ලయⓗ䛻ᩍ䛘䛶䛟䛰䛥䛔䚹㻌 タၥ㻔㻟㻢㻕䛷䐠䡚䐢䛸ᅇ⟅䛧䛯ሙྜ䚸᪥ᮏ㧗➼ᩍ⫱ホ౯ᶵᵓ䛜ᖹᡂ 㻞㻠 ᖺᗘ䛛䜙ᐇ䛩䜛ㄆドホ౯ 䛾᪂䛧䛔ᇶ‽䛻ᑐ䛧䛶Ꮫෆ䛷ఱ䛛ྲྀ⤌䜏䜢䛧䛶䛔䜎䛩䛛䚹㻌 㻌 䐟ఱ䜒䛧䛶䛔䛺䛔䚹㻌 㻌 䐠䝩䞊䝮䝨䞊䝆䜔䝉䝭䝘䞊䛾ཧຍ䛺䛹䛻䜘䜚㛵㐃ሗ䜢㞟䛧䛶䛔䜛䚹㻌 㻌 䐡㞟䛧䛯ሗ䜢ሗ࿌䜔ຮᙉ䛾ᐇ䛻䜘䜚ඹ᭷䛧䛶䛔䜛䚹㻌 㻌 䐢Ꮫ⊂⮬䛾⮬ᕫ䞉Ⅼ᳨ホ౯㡯┠䛾ぢ┤䛧䜔Ꮫ⊂⮬䛾≉Ⰽ䛒䜛ᇶ‽䜢᳨ウ䛧䛶䛔䜛䚹㻌 㻌 䐣᪥ᮏ㧗➼ᩍ⫱ホ౯ᶵᵓ䛾ᇶ‽䜢㋃䜎䛘䛯⮬ᕫⅬ᳨䞉ホ౯䛾ᐇ䜢䛧䛶䛔䜛䚹㻌 㻌 䐤䛭䛾㻌 タၥ㻔㻟㻤㻕䛷䐤䛭䛾䛸ᅇ⟅䛧䛯ሙྜ䛿䚸䛭䛾ෆᐜ䜢ලయⓗ䛻ᩍ䛘䛶䛟䛰䛥䛔䚹㻌 㻞 ᅇ┠䛾ㄆドホ౯䜒᪥ᮏ㧗➼ᩍ⫱ホ౯ᶵᵓ䛷ཷ䛡䜛ணᐃ䛷䛩䛛䚹㻌 㻌 䐟䛿䛔㻌 㻌 䐠䛔䛔䛘㻌 㻌 䐡᳨ウ୰㻌 ㄆドホ౯ᶵ㛵䜢Ỵᐃ䛩䜛㝿䛻᭱䜒ඃඛ䛧䛶䛔䜛㡯䜢ᩍ䛘䛶䛟䛰䛥䛔䚹㻌 㻌 䐟ホ౯ᇶ‽㻌 㻌 䐠ホ౯䛾䝥䝻䝉䝇㻌 㻌 䐡㈝⏝䠄ホ౯ᩱ䠅㻌 㻌 䐢Ꮫ䜒ྵ䜐㐣ཤ䛾ホ౯⤖ᯝ㻌 㻌 䐣ຍ┕䛧䛶䛔䜛⚾Ꮫᅋయ䛸䛾㛵ಀᛶ㻌 㻌 䐤ᆅᇦ䜔つᶍ➼䜢ྵ䜐Ꮫ䛾ືྥ㻌 㻌 䐥䛭䛾㻌 タၥ㻔㻠㻝㻕䛷䐥䛭䛾䛸ᅇ⟅䛧䛯ሙྜ䛿䚸䛭䛾ෆᐜ䜢ලయⓗ䛻ᩍ䛘䛶䛟䛰䛥䛔䚹㻌 69 ㄆドホ౯ᶵ㛵䜢Ỵᐃ䛩䜛㝿䛻␒┠䛻ඃඛ䛧䛶䛔䜛㡯䜢ᩍ䛘䛶䛟䛰䛥䛔䚹㻌 㻌 䐟ホ౯ᇶ‽㻌 㻌 䐠ホ౯䛾䝥䝻䝉䝇㻌 㻌 䐡㈝⏝䠄ホ౯ᩱ䠅㻌 タၥ㻔㻠㻟㻕㻌 㻌 䐢Ꮫ䜒ྵ䜐㐣ཤ䛾ホ౯⤖ᯝ㻌 㻌 䐣ຍ┕䛧䛶䛔䜛⚾Ꮫᅋయ䛸䛾㛵ಀᛶ㻌 㻌 䐤ᆅᇦ䜔つᶍ➼䜢ྵ䜐Ꮫ䛾ືྥ㻌 㻌 䐥䛭䛾㻌 タၥ㻔㻠㻠㻕㻌 タၥ㻔㻠㻟㻕䛷䐥䛭䛾䛸ᅇ⟅䛧䛯ሙྜ䛿䚸䛭䛾ෆᐜ䜢ලయⓗ䛻ᩍ䛘䛶䛟䛰䛥䛔䚹㻌 ㄆドホ౯ᶵ㛵䜢Ỵᐃ䛩䜛㝿䛻୕␒┠䛻ඃඛ䛧䛶䛔䜛㡯䜢ᩍ䛘䛶䛟䛰䛥䛔䚹㻌 㻌 䐟ホ౯ᇶ‽㻌 㻌 䐠ホ౯䛾䝥䝻䝉䝇㻌 㻌 䐡㈝⏝䠄ホ౯ᩱ䠅㻌 タၥ㻔㻠㻡㻕㻌 㻌 䐢Ꮫ䜒ྵ䜐㐣ཤ䛾ホ౯⤖ᯝ㻌 㻌 䐣ຍ┕䛧䛶䛔䜛⚾Ꮫᅋయ䛸䛾㛵ಀᛶ㻌 㻌 䐤ᆅᇦ䜔つᶍ➼䜢ྵ䜐Ꮫ䛾ືྥ㻌 㻌 䐥䛭䛾㻌 タၥ㻔㻠㻢㻕㻌 タၥ㻔㻠㻡㻕䛷䐥䛭䛾䛸ᅇ⟅䛧䛯ሙྜ䛿䚸䛭䛾ෆᐜ䜢ලయⓗ䛻ᩍ䛘䛶䛟䛰䛥䛔䚹㻌 㻝 ᅇ┠䛸 㻞 ᅇ┠䛾ㄆドホ౯ཷᑂ䛾⮬ᕫホ౯ᢸᙜ⪅㻔㻸㻻㻕䛿ྠ୍ே≀䛷䛩䛛䚹⌧ẁ㝵䛷䛾ணᐃ䛷ᵓ 䛔䜎䛫䜣䛾䛷ᩍ䛘䛶䛟䛰䛥䛔䚹㻌 タၥ㻔㻠㻣㻕㻌 㻌 䐟䛿䛔㻌 ྠ୍ே≀䜢⪃䛘䛶䛔䜛䚹㻌 㻌 䐠䛔䛔䛘㻌 㐪䛖ே≀䜢⪃䛘䛶䛔䜛䚹㻌 㻌 䐡ᮍᐃ䞉᳨ウ୰㻌 ⮬ᕫホ౯ᢸᙜ⪅㻔㻸㻻㻕䛿䛹䛾䜘䛖䛺᮲௳䛷㑅䜀䜜䜎䛩䛛䚹㻌 㻌 䐟⮬ᕫⅬ᳨䞉ホ౯䜢⾜䛖ጤဨ䛾㛗䛜⮬ᕫホ౯ᢸᙜ⪅㻔㻸㻻㻕䛻䛺䜛䚹㻌 㻌 䐠⮬ᕫⅬ᳨䞉ホ౯䜢ྲྀ䜚䜎䛸䜑䜛㒊⨫䛾㛗䛜⮬ᕫホ౯ᢸᙜ⪅㻔㻸㻻㻕䛻䛺䜛䚹㻌 タၥ㻔㻠㻤㻕㻌 㻌 䐡ᣦᐃ䛾ᙺ⫋⪅䛜⮬ᕫホ౯ᢸᙜ⪅㻔㻸㻻㻕䛻䛺䜛䚹㻌 㻌 䐢ᩍဨ䛜⮬ᕫホ౯ᢸᙜ⪅䠄㻸㻻䠅䛻䛺䜛䚹㻌 㻌 䐣⫋ဨ䛜⮬ᕫホ౯ᢸᙜ⪅䠄㻸㻻䠅䛻䛺䜛䚹㻌 㻌 䐤䛭䛾㻌 タၥ㻔㻠㻥㻕㻌 タၥ㻔㻠㻤㻕䛷䐡䛸ᅇ⟅䛧䛯ሙྜ䛿䚸ᣦᐃ䛾ᙺ⫋ྡ䜢ᩍ䛘䛶䛟䛰䛥䛔䚹㻌 タၥ㻔㻡㻜㻕㻌 タၥ㻔㻠㻤㻕䛷䐥䛸ᅇ⟅䛧䛯ሙྜ䛿䚸䛭䛾ෆᐜ䜢ලయⓗ䛻ᩍ䛘䛶䛟䛰䛥䛔䚹㻌 ▷ᮇᏛ䛾ㄆドホ౯䛻䛴䛔䛶䛚ఛ䛔䛧䜎䛩䚹㻌 ྠ୍ἲேෆ䛻▷ᮇᏛ䜢タ⨨䛧䛶䛔䜎䛩䛛䚹㻌 タၥ㻔㻡㻝㻕㻌 㻌 䐟䛿䛔㻌 㻌 䐠䛔䛔䛘㻌 ホ౯ᶵᵓ䛷䛿ᖹᡂ 㻞㻟 ᖺᗘ䛛䜙▷ᮇᏛ䛾ဨไᗘ䜢Ⓨ㊊䛧䜎䛧䛯䛜䚸ධ䜢᳨ウ䛧䛶䛔䜎䛩䛛䚹㻌 㻌 䐟䛿䛔㻌 タၥ㻔㻡㻞㻕㻌 㻌 䐠䛔䛔䛘㻌 㻌 䐡䛩䛷䛻ධ䛧䛶䛔䜛㻌 ホ౯ᶵᵓ䛷䛿▷ᮇᏛ䛾ᶵ㛵ูㄆドホ౯䜒ᐇ䛷䛝䜎䛩䛜䚸ホ౯ᶵᵓ䛷▷ᮇᏛᶵ㛵ูㄆドホ ౯䜢ཷᑂ䛩䜛䛣䛸䜢᳨ウ䛧䛶䛔䜎䛩䛛䚹㻌 タၥ㻔㻡㻟㻕㻌 㻌 䐟䛿䛔㻌 㻌 䐠䛔䛔䛘㻌 Ꮫ䛾⮬ᕫⅬ᳨䞉ホ౯యไ䛸▷ᮇᏛ䛾⮬ᕫⅬ᳨䞉ホ౯యไ䛿ྠ䛨䛷䛩䛛䚹㻌 㻌 䐟䛟ྠ䛨⤌⧊䛷ᐇ䛧䛶䛔䜛䚹㻌 タၥ㻔㻡㻠㻕㻌 㻌 䐠ᵓᡂ䛿ྠ䛨䛰䛜␗䛺䜛䝯䞁䝞䞊䛷ᐇ䛧䛶䛔䜛䚹䠄䝯䞁䝞䞊䛻㔜」䛒䜚䠅㻌 㻌 䐡ᵓᡂ䛿ྠ䛨䛰䛜␗䛺䜛䝯䞁䝞䞊䛷ᐇ䛧䛶䛔䜛䚹䠄䝯䞁䝞䞊䛻㔜」䛺䛧䠅㻌 㻌 䐢⤌⧊䜒ᵓᡂ䜒䛭䜜䛮䜜⊂⮬䛻ᐇ䛧䛶䛔䜛䚹㻌 ᪥ᮏ㧗➼ᩍ⫱ホ౯ᶵᵓ䛻ᑐ䛧䛶䛾䛤ពぢ䜢䛚ఛ䛔䛧䜎䛩䚹㻌 ホ౯ᶵᵓ䛻ᑐ䛧䛶ᚋ䛹䛾䜘䛖䛺䛣䛸䜢ᮇᚅ䛧䜎䛩䛛䚹㻌 㻌 タၥ㻔㻡㻡㻕㻌 㡯┠䛤䛸䛻䠄䐟䛸䛶䜒ᮇᚅ䛩䜛㻌 䐠ᮇᚅ䛩䜛㻌 䐡䛒䜎䜚ᮇᚅ䛧䛺䛔㻌 䐢⌧≧䛷‶㊊㻌 䐣䜟䛛䜙䛺䛔䠅䜘 䜚㑅ᢥ䛧䚸䛚⟅䛟䛰䛥䛔䚹㻌 㻔㻡㻡㻕㻙㻝㻌 㻌 䕔ㄆ▱ᗘ䜔♫ⓗᆅ䠄䝇䝔䞊䝍䝇䠅䛾ྥୖ㻌 㻔㻡㻡㻕㻙㻞㻌 㻌 䕔ᅜෆ䛻䛚䛡䜛䛾ホ౯ᶵ㛵䛸䛾㐃ᦠ㻌 㻔㻡㻡㻕㻙㻟㻌 㻌 䕔ᾏእ䛾ホ౯ᶵ㛵䛸䛾㐃ᦠ㻌 㻌 70 㻔㻡㻡㻕㻙㻠㻌 㻔㻡㻡㻕㻙㻡㻌 㻔㻡㻡㻕㻙㻢㻌 㻔㻡㻡㻕㻙㻣㻌 㻔㻡㻡㻕㻙㻤㻌 㻔㻡㻡㻕㻙㻥㻌 㻔㻡㻡㻕㻙㻝㻜㻌 㻔㻡㻡㻕㻙㻝㻝㻌 㻔㻡㻡㻕㻙㻝㻞㻌 㻔㻡㻡㻕㻙㻝㻟㻌 タၥ㻔㻡㻢㻕㻌 タၥ㻔㻡㻣㻕㻌 㻌 䕔⚾Ꮫ䛻≉䛧䛯ホ౯ᇶ‽䛾タᐃ㻌 㻌 䕔ᅜ㝿ⓗᶆ‽䜢ྲྀධ䜜䛯ホ౯ᇶ‽䛾タᐃ㻌 㻌 㻌 㻌 㻌 㻌 䕔ᆅᇦ䞉タ⨨Ꮫၥ⣔⤫䜢⪃៖䛧䛯ᐃᛶⓗ䛺ุ᩿㻌 㻌 䕔㐣ཤ䛾ᣦ䛻ᇶ䛵䛟බᖹ䛺ุ᩿㻌 㻌 㻌 䕔䝢䜰䝺䝡䝳䞊䜢ព㆑䛧䛯ホ౯ဨ◊ಟ䛾ᐇ㻌 㻌 䕔ཷᑂ䛻䛛䛛䜛ົ㈇ᢸ䛾㍍ῶ㻌 㻌 䕔ᐇᆅㄪᰝ䛾⡆⣲䠄㻞 ᪥㛫䊻㻝 ᪥䠅㻌 㻌 䕔ཷᑂ๓䛾๓┦ㄯ䛾ᐇ㻌 㻌 㻌 䕔䜰䝣䝍䞊䝃䞊䝡䝇䛾ᐇ㻌 㻌 㻌 㻌 㻌 㻌 㻌 㻌 㻌 䕔䝩䞊䝮䝨䞊䝆䜔ᶵ㛵ㄅ䛾ᐇ㻌 䛭䛾䚸ホ౯ᶵᵓ䛻ᑐ䛧䛶ᮇᚅ䛩䜛ྲྀ⤌䜏䛜䛒䜜䜀ᩍ䛘䛶䛟䛰䛥䛔䚹㻌 Ꮫෆ䛾⮬ᕫⅬ᳨䞉ホ౯άື䛻䛚䛔䛶ホ౯ᶵᵓ䛜ᨭ䛷䛝䜛䛸ᛮ䜟䜜䜛䛣䛸䜢ୗグ䜘䜚㑅ᢥ䛧䛶䛟䛰 䛥䛔䚹㻌 㻌 䐟᪂ホ౯ᇶ‽䛻䛴䛔䛶䛾ゎㄝ㻌 㻌 䐠㐣ཤ䛾ホ౯䛻䛴䛔䛶䛾ሗⓎಙ㻌 㻌 䐡▷ᮇᏛホ౯䛻䛴䛔䛶䛾ሗⓎಙ㻌 㻌 䐢ศ㔝ูホ౯䛻䛴䛔䛶䛾ሗⓎಙ㻌 㻌 䐣⫋ဨ◊ಟ䛾୍⎔䛸䛧䛶䛾㈗Ꮫ⫋ဨ䛾ホ౯ᶵᵓ䜈䛾ཷධ䜜㻌 㻌 䐤ㄆドホ౯ไᗘ䛻䛴䛔䛶䛾ሗⓎಙ㻌 㻌 䐥≉䛻䛺䛧㻌 71 Ϫ ࣥࢱࣅ࣮ࣗㄪᰝ ឡ▱ᕤᴗᏛ ࠙ᖹᡂ ᖺᗘཷᑂࠚ ㄆドホ౯⤖ᯝࡢබ⾲ࡑࡢᚋࡢྲྀ⤌ࡳ Ꮫࡣࠊ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯ጤဨࢆ୰ᚰࠊᖹᡂ 19(2007)ᖺᗘホ౯ᶵᵓࡀᐇࡍࡿㄆド ホ౯ࢆཷᑂࡋࠊ3 ᭶ㄆᐃࡢ⤖ᯝࢆཷ㡿ࡋࡓࠋ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯ጤဨࡣࠊᏛ㛗ࢆ➹㢌 Ꮫ㒊㛗ࡸ◊✲⛉㛗ࠊົᒁ㛗ࠊࡑࡢࠊᩍᏛࡸᑵ⫋ࠊᏛ⏕ࡢཷධࢀࢆ⟶⌮ࡍࡿ㒊⨫࡞ ࡓࡿ㒊⨫ࡢ㛗ࢆྵࡵ 10 ே⛬ᗘ࡛ᵓᡂࡉࢀࠊጤဨ࡛ࡢ᳨ウ㡯ࡸỴᐃ㡯ࡣࡍࡄྛ 㒊㛛ఏ㐩ࡉࢀࡿయไࢆഛ࠼࡚࠸ࡿࠋ ㄆドホ౯ࡢ⤖ᯝࡘ࠸࡚ࡣࠊ⮬ᕫホ౯ሗ࿌᭩ࢆ࣮࣒࣮࣍࣌ࢪ࡛බ⾲ࡍࡿࠊホ౯ሗ࿌ ᭩ేࡏ࡚Ꮚࢆసᡂࡋࠊྠ୍ἲேෆࡢᩍ⫋ဨ㓄ࡍࡿࡶࠊឡ▱┴ෆࡢᏛࡸ ᴗ࡞㏦ࡋࡓࠋ Ꮫࡢᩍ⫋ဨᑐࡋ࡚ࡣࠊᏛ༠㆟࠾࠸࡚බ⾲ࡉࢀࡓホ౯⤖ᯝࡢሗ࿌ᣦෆᐜ ࡘ࠸࡚ࡢㄝ᫂ࢆ⾜࠸ࠊᖿ㒊ᙺဨᑐࡋ࡚ࡣࠊᏛࡢࡳ♧ࡉࢀࡓᣦ㡯ࡶグ㍕ࡉࢀࡓㄪ ᰝሗ࿌᭩ࡶ㓄ࡋࡓࠋ ㄆドホ౯࠾࠸࡚ᣦࡉࢀࡓ࡚ࡢ㡯ࡘ࠸࡚ࡣࠊホ౯⤖ᯝཷ㡿ᚋࠊࡍࡄᨵၿ╔ ᡭࡋࡓࠋࡲࡓࠊᖹᡂ 21(2009)ᖺᗘᐇࡋࡓ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯ࡢ㝿ࡣࠊㄆドホ౯ཷᑂ సᡂࡋࡓ⮬ᕫホ౯ሗ࿌᭩ᣲࡆࡓᨵၿ࣭ྥୖ᪉⟇ࢆᇶ‽ࡈᢤ⢋ࡋࠊㄆドホ౯ཷᑂ௨㝆 ࡢ㐍ᤖ≧ἣࡸ᭦࡞ࡿㄢ㢟ࡘ࠸࡚ేࡏ࡚Ⅼ᳨ཬࡧホ౯ࢆ⾜࠸ࠊ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯ሗ࿌᭩ ᫎࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ Ꮫࡢホ౯⤖ᯝࢆཧ⪃⮬ࡽࢆⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯ Ꮫෆࡢ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯ࡣࠊࡇࢀࡲ࡛ᖹᡂ 14(2002)ᖺᗘࠊᖹᡂ 19(2007)ᖺᗘࠊᖹᡂ 21(2009) ᖺᗘᐇࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋᐇࡢ࿘ᮇࡘ࠸࡚ࡣつᐃࡋ࡚࠾ࡽࡎࠊ୰㛗ᮇⓗ࡞ィ⏬ࡢ㐍ᤖ≧ἣ ࡸㄆドホ౯ཷᑂࡢ⤖ᯝᛂࡌ࡚⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯ጤဨࡀ㐺ᐅỴᐃࡋᐇࡋ࡚ࡁࡓࠋᖹᡂ 19(2007)ᖺ௨㝆ࡢ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯ࡣࠊホ౯ᶵᵓࡀタᐃࡍࡿᏛホ౯ᇶ‽ᇶ࡙ࡁᐇࡋࠊ ⤖ᯝࡣ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯ሗ࿌᭩ࡋ࡚Ꮚࡲࡵ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯ࡢࡅ࡞ࡿᏛෆࢹ࣮ࢱཬࡧᩍဨࡢᩍ⫱◊✲άືࡘ࠸࡚ࡣࠊẖᖺࠊ ᗢົㄢࡀ୰ᚰ࡞ࡗ࡚㞟࣭ᢕᥱࡋࠊᚲせᛂࡌ࡚⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯ጤဨሗ࿌ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ ేࡏ࡚ᗢົㄢ࡛ࡣࠊẖᖺᗘᮎホ౯ᶵᵓࡼࡾබ⾲ࡉࢀࡿㄆドホ౯⤖ᯝሗ࿌᭩ཬࡧྛᏛ ࡢ⮬ᕫホ౯ሗ࿌᭩ࢆ࡚☜ㄆࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋホ౯⤖ᯝሗ࿌᭩࠾࠸࡚ྛᏛࡀᣦࡉࢀ࡚࠸ࡿ 㡯㸦ඃࢀࡓⅬ࣭ᨵၿࢆせࡍࡿⅬ࣭ཧ⪃ពぢ㸧ࡘ࠸࡚ࠊᇶ‽ࡈྲྀࡾࡲࡵࠊ⮬ᕫⅬ ᳨࣭ホ౯ጤဨሗ࿌ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿ㸦76 ࣮࣌ࢪ࠙⾲ 1ࠚཧ↷㸧 ࠋ ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯ጤဨ࡛ࡣࠊྛᣦෆᐜࢆᏛෆࡢ≧ἣ↷ࡽࡋྜࢃࡏࠊ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯ ᫎࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ 75 䛆⾲ 㻝䛇Ꮫ䛾ពぢ䛻ᑐ䛩䜛ᮏᏛ䛾≧ἣ㻌 ᇶ‽1 ᘓᏛࡢ⢭⚄࣭Ꮫࡢᇶᮏ⌮ᛕཬࡧ࣭┠ⓗ ࠙ཧ⪃ពぢࠚ ᮏᏛ ࣭ࢆۑۑ㋃ࡲ࠼࡚ࠊᏛࡢ┠ⓗࡘ࠸࡚㆟ㄽࢆ㔜ࡡࠊࡘබ⾲࣭࿘▱ ᮏᏛ࡛ࡣࠊ࡚ࡋۑۑ ດຊࡋ࡚ࡁࡓࡇࡣホ౯࡛ࡁࡿࡀࠊ㈨ᩱබ⾲ᮇࡼࡗ࡚⏝࠸ࡽࢀࡿ ෆᐜ ゝⴥࡢ⾲⌧ࡀ⤫୍ࡉࢀ࡚࠸࡞࠸ࡢ࡛ࠊ᳨ウࡀᮃࡲࢀࡿࠋ ᇶ‽2 ᩍ⫱◊✲⤌⧊ ࠙ᨵၿࢆせࡍࡿⅬࠚ ෆᐜ ᮏᏛ ࣭Ꮫᰯᩍ⫱ἲ⾜つ๎๎ࡾࠊᩍᤵࡢᵓᡂဨ࡛࡞࠸ࡀۑۑۑۑ௦㆟ဨᵓ ᮏᏛ࡛ࡣࠊ࡚ࡋۑۑ ᡂဨ࡛࠶ࡿⅬࡘ࠸࡚ࠊᨵၿࡀᚲせ࡛࠶ࡿࠋ ᑐᛂࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ ᑐᛂࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ ࣭ᩍᤵࡀᩍᏛ㛵ࡍࡿពᛮỴᐃ㛵ࢃࡗ࡚࠸࡞࠸Ⅼࡘ࠸࡚ࠊᨵၿࡀᚲせ ࡛࠶ࡿࠋ ᮏᏛ࡛ࡣࠊࡀۑۑయ ࡞ࡗ࡚ᐇࡋ࡚࠸ ࡿࠋ ࠙ཧ⪃ពぢࠚ ෆᐜ ᮏᏛ ࣭ᩍ㣴ᩍ⫱య㈐௵ࢆᣢࡘᑓ㛛ࡢ⤌⧊ࢆ⨨ࡁࠊᩍ㣴ᩍ⫱ࢆ⤌⧊ⓗ㺃⥅⥆ⓗ ᮏᏛ࡛ࡣࠊࡀۑۑయ ᐇ࣭ᙉࡋ࡚࠸ࡃࡇࡀᮃࡲࢀࡿࠋ㸦17Ꮫ㸧 ࡞ࡗ࡚ᐇࡋ࡚࠸ ࡿࠋ ࣭ ࣭ ࣭ ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯ጤဨࢆ୰ᚰࡋࡓᨵၿࡢయไ࡙ࡃࡾ Ꮫෆࢹ࣮ࢱࡢ㞟ࡸᩍဨࡢᩍ⫱◊✲άືࡢᢕᥱཬࡧᏛࡢホ౯⤖ᯝࢆࡶᐇࡋ࡚ ࠸ࡿ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯ࡢෆᐜࡘ࠸࡚ࡣࠊ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯ጤဨࡽᏛෆⓎಙࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ Ꮫෆ࡛ࡇࡢࡼ࠺࡞ሗࢆඹ᭷ࡍࡿࡇࡼࡾࠊᩍ⫋ဨ୍ேࡦࡾࡢ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯ᑐࡍ ࡿ⌮ゎࡸព㆑ࡢྥୖࢆಁࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋࡲࡓࠊ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯ࡢ⤖ᯝࠊᨵၿྲྀ⤌ࡴࡁ㡯 ࡸ᳨ウࡍࡁ㡯ࡀ࠶ࡗࡓሙྜࡣࠊ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯ጤဨ࠾࠸࡚ྛ㒊⨫ࡢศࡅస ᴗࡀ⾜ࢃࢀࠊࡑࢀࡒࢀࡢ㒊⨫ࡀᑐᛂ࠶ࡓࡗ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ ⌧ᅾࠊࡑࡢᑐᛂᚋࡢ≧ἣࡘ࠸࡚ࡣࠊ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯ᐇసᡂࡍࡿ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯ ሗ࿌᭩ࡲࡵࡿࡇࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࡀࠊᚋࡣࠊྛ㒊⨫ࡢྲྀ⤌ࡳ≧ἣࡸ᳨ウ⤖ᯝᑐࡋ࡚⮬ ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯ጤဨࡀⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯ࢆ⾜࠸Ꮫෆྥࡅ࡚ሗⓎಙࡍࡿ࡞ࠊ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯ άືࡢ᭦࡞ࡿάᛶࡘ࡞ࡀࡿ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯ጤဨࡢ࠶ࡾ᪉ࡘ࠸᳨࡚ウࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ ḟᅇࡢㄆドホ౯ྥࡅ࡚ 76 Ꮫࡣࠊḟᅇࡢㄆドホ౯ཷᑂྥࡅᖹᡂ 22 (2010)ᖺᗘࡽホ౯ᶵᵓࡢ᪂ࡋ࠸Ꮫホ౯ᇶ‽ ྜࢃࡏ࡚ 4 ࡘࡢ࣮࣡࢟ࣥࢢࢢ࣮ࣝࣉࢆⓎ㊊ࡉ ࡏࡓࠋ ୍ࡘࡢࢢ࣮ࣝࣉࡣࠊࡑࢀࡒࢀ 5ࠊ6 ேࡢ⫋ ဨࡀ㓄⨨ࡉࢀࠊྛᇶ‽࠶ࡓࡿ࢚ࣅࢹࣥࢫࡢ 㞟ࢆ⾜ࡗ࡚࠸ࡿࠋࡲࡓࠊ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯ጤဨ ࡶ㝙ᖍࡍࡿ࡞ࠊ⫋ဨࡀ࣮࣡࢟ࣥࢢࢢ࣮ࣝࣉ ࡢάືࢆ㏻ࡋ࡚ࠊᏛෆࡢ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯άື ✚ᴟⓗ㛵ࢃࡿࡇࡢ࡛ࡁࡿయไ࡙ࡃࡾࢆ㐍ࡵ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ ๓ᅇࡢㄆドホ౯࡛ࡣࠊᩍဨࡀ⮬ᕫホ౯ሗ࿌᭩సᡂᦠࢃࡗ࡚࠾ࡾࠊ⫋ဨࡢ㛵ࢃࡾࡀ ᕼ࡛ⷧ࠶ࡗࡓࠋ᭩㠃㉁ၥࡢᅇ⟅ࡸᐇᆅㄪᰝࡢ㠃ㄯࢆ㐍ࡵࡿ୰࡛ࠊ ࠕᏛⓗ࡞ྲྀ⤌ࡳࠖࡢ㔜せ ᛶࡘ࠸࡚ᨵࡵ࡚ぢ┤ࡍᚲせᛶࢆឤࡌࡓࡇࡀࠊᅇࡢ࣮࣡࢟ࣥࢢࢢ࣮ࣝࣉⓎ㊊ࡢࡁࡗ ࡅࡶ࡞ࡗ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ࣮࣡࢟ࣥࢢࢢ࣮ࣝࣉⓎ㊊ࡣࠊホ౯ᶵᵓࡢᏛホ౯ᇶ‽ࡸᐇ⥘ࡢ ኚ᭦క࠺ὶࢀࡣ࠶ࡿࡶࡢࡢࠊᩍ⫋ဨࡀ୍య࡞ࡗࡓࠕᏛⓗࠖ࡞యไࡢᵓ⠏࠸࠺┠ⓗ ࡶྵࡲࢀ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ ㄆドホ౯ཷᑂࡼࡾᏛෆࡢⅬ᳨ᇶ‽ࡘ࠸࡚ࡶぢ┤ࡋࡀ㐍ࡳࠊእ㒊ࡽࡢᣦࢆཷࡅࡿ ࡇ࡛ࠊᨵၿࡢྲྀ⤌ࡳᑐࡍࡿព㆑ࡣ㧗ࡲࡾࠊయไࡶᩚഛࡉࢀጞࡵ࡚࠸ࡿࠋࡔࡀࠊ᪥ᖖ ᴗົࡀࡢࡼ࠺⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯ࡸㄆドホ౯㛵ࢃࡗ࡚࠸ࡿࡢࡘ࠸࡚ࡢㄆ㆑ࡸ⌮ゎࡣࠊ ᮍࡔⓎᒎ㏵ୖ࡛࠶ࡿᤊ࠼࡚࠸ࡿࠋྛಶேࡢព㆑ྥୖࡢࡓࡵࡶᚋ࣮࣡࢟ࣥࢢࢢ࣮ࣝࣉ ࡢά⏝ࡀㄢ㢟࡛࠶ࡿࡋࠊ᳨ウࢆ⥆ࡅ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ یឡ▱ᕤᴗᏛࡢᴫἣ㸦ᖹᡂ ᖺᖺ ᭶ ᪥⌧ᅾ㸧 ࠙㛤タᖺᗘࠚ 34(1959)ᖺᗘ ࠙ᡤᅾᆅࠚ ឡ▱┴㇏⏣ᕷඵⲡ⏫ඵ༓ⲡ 1247 ឡ▱┴ྡྂᒇᕷ༓✀༊ᮾᒣ㏻ 1-38-1㸦ᮏᒣ࢟ࣕࣥࣃࢫ㸧 ឡ▱┴ྡྂᒇᕷ༓✀༊⮬⏤ࣨୣ 2-49-2㸦⮬⏤ࡀୣ࢟ࣕࣥࣃࢫ㸧 ࠙Ꮫ㒊࣭◊✲⛉ࠚ Ꮫ㒊࣭◊✲⛉ Ꮫ⛉࣭◊✲⛉ᑓᨷ ᕤᏛ㒊 㟁ẼᏛ⛉ ᛂ⏝Ꮫ⛉ ᶵᲔᏛ⛉㒔ᕷ⎔ቃᏛ⛉ ᘓ⠏Ꮫ⛉ ⤒ႠᏛ㒊 ⤒ႠᏛ⛉ 77 ሗ⛉Ꮫ㒊 ᕤᏛ◊✲⛉ ⤒Ⴀሗ⛉Ꮫ◊✲⛉ ሗ⛉Ꮫ⛉ 㟁Ẽ㟁ᏊᕤᏛᑓᨷ ᮦᩱᏛᑓᨷ ᶵᲔᕤᏛᑓᨷ ᘓタࢩࢫࢸ࣒ᕤᏛᑓᨷ 㟁Ẽ࣭ᮦᩱᕤᏛᑓᨷ ⏕⏘࣭ᘓタᕤᏛᑓᨷ ⤒Ⴀሗ⛉Ꮫᑓᨷ ࠙ゼၥ᪥ࠚ ᖹᡂ 24(2012)ᖺ 3 ᭶ 13 ᪥ ࠙㠃ㄯ⪅ࠚ ✄ᇉ ឵ Ặ Ꮫ㛗࣭ᩍᤵ࣭Ꮫ⏕ᨭᮏ㒊㛗 ἑ Ύே Ặ Ꮫົ㒊ᗢົㄢ㛗වຓᡂㄢ㛗 ࠙ゼၥ⪅ࠚ 㝣 㚝᪳ ホ౯ᴗ㒊ḟ㛗 ᯈᇉ ᬛ㤶 ホ౯ᴗ㒊ホ౯◊✲ㄢ௵ 78 㜰ၟᴗᏛ ࠙ᖹᡂ ᖺᗘཷᑂࠚ 㸬Ꮫ࠾ࡅࡿ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯άື Ꮫࡢ᪥ᖖⓗ࡞⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯ࡣࠕ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨ホ౯ጤဨࠖࡑࡢసᴗ㒊࡛࠶ࡿࠕ⮬ᕫ Ⅼ᳨ホ౯ᐇጤဨࠖࢆ୰ᚰᐇࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ ࠕ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨ホ౯ጤဨࠖࡣࠊጤဨ㛗ࢆᏛ㛗ࠊጤဨ㛗ࢆᏛ㛗ົᒁ㛗ࡋࠊጤဨ ࡋ࡚⤒῭Ꮫ㒊⥲ྜ⤒ႠᏛ㒊ࡢ 2 Ꮫ㒊ࡢᏛ㒊㛗ࠊ⤒῭Ꮫ⛉ࠊ⤒ႠᏛ⛉ࠊၟᏛ⛉ཬࡧබඹ⤒ ႠᏛ⛉ࡢ 4 Ꮫ⛉ࡢᏛ⛉௵ࠊFD ጤဨጤဨ㛗ࠊົᒁഃࡋ࡚ᩍົㄢ㛗ᗢົㄢ㛗ࡢྜ ィ 12 ே࡛ᵓᡂࡉࢀ࡚࠾ࡾࠊࡑࡢጤဨࡢ୰ࡽ㑅ࡤࢀࡓ⪅ࡀ㒊࡛࠶ࡿࠕ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨ホ౯ᐇ ጤဨࠖࢆᵓᡂࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ ࠙ཧ⪃ࠚ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨ホ౯ಀࡿ㐠Ⴀ⤌⧊ᅗ㸦 ᖺ ᭶㹼㸧 ⌮䠄⌮㛗䠅 Ꮫ㐠Ⴀ༠㆟ 䠄Ꮫ㛗䠅 㜰ၟᴗᏛ䠄Ꮫ㛗䠅 Ꮫ㝔ᩍᤵ䠄◊✲⛉㛗䠅 ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨ホ౯ጤဨ ᩍᤵ䠄Ꮫ㛗䞉Ꮫ㛗䠅 බⓗ◊✲㈝䛻ಀ䜛 ෆ㒊┘ᰝጤဨ 䠄Ꮫ㛗䠅 ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨ホ౯ ᐇጤဨ䠄Ꮫ㒊㛗䠅 Ꮫ㒊㐃⤡㆟䠄Ꮫ㛗䠅 ྛ✀ጤဨ ྛᶵ㛵ጤဨ ົᒁ䠄ົᒁ㛗䠅 ἲேᮏ㒊 ጤဨ Ꮫ㐠Ⴀ༠㆟ Ꮫ㛗 Ꮫ㛗 Ꮫ㒊㐃⤡༠㆟ Ꮫ㛗 ⥲ྜ⤒ႠᏛ㒊㛗 ጤဨ䠄ᑓ㛛㒊䠅 ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨ホ౯ጤဨ 㒊 ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨ホ౯ ᐇጤဨ Ꮫ㛗 Ꮫ㛗 ົᒁ㛗 ⤒῭Ꮫ㒊㛗 ⤒῭Ꮫ⛉௵ ົᒁ㛗ᐊ䚷ᩍົㄢ䚷Ꮫಟᨭㄢ䚷Ꮫ⏕⏕άㄢ 䜻䝱䝸䜰䝃䝫䞊䝖ᐊ䚷ᗈሗධヨㄢ䚷ᗢົㄢ䚷ᅗ᭩㤋ົᐊ Ꮫ⾡◊✲ົᐊ䚷♫㐃ᦠ䞉◊✲ᨭㄢ ጤ䚷䚷䚷䚷䚷䚷䚷䚷ဨ ጤဨ Ꮫ㒊㛗䚸Ꮫ⛉௵䚸Ꮫ㝔ᆅᇦᨻ⟇Ꮫ◊✲⛉㛗䚸ᅗ᭩㤋㛗䚸ẚ㍑ᆅᇦ◊✲ᡤ㛗䚸䜰䝭䝳䞊䝈䝯䞁 䝖⏘ᴗ◊✲ᡤᡤ㛗䚸ၟᴗྐ༤≀㤋㛗䚸㻶㻳㻿㻿◊✲䝉䞁䝍䞊㛗䚸䝇䝫䞊䝒䝉䞁䝍䞊㛗䚸ົᒁ㛗 ົᒁ㛗ᐊ ⤒῭Ꮫ㒊㛗䚸Ꮫ⛉௵䚸ົᒁ㛗䚸ᩍົㄢ㛗 ົᒁ㛗ᐊ ጤ䚷䚷䚷䚷䚷䚷䚷䚷ဨ Ꮫ㒊㛗䚸Ꮫ⛉௵䚸㻲㻰ጤဨ㛗䚸ᩍົㄢ㛗䚸ᗢົㄢ㛗 Ꮫ⛉௵䚸ᗢົㄢ㛗䚸ᩍົㄢ㛗 ጤဨ ົᒁ㛗ᐊ ᩍົㄢ ࠕ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨ホ౯ᐇጤဨࠖࡣࠊᏛࡢྛ㒊⨫ࢆᡤ⟶ࡍࡿጤဨࡽ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯ࡢ ᰿ᣐ࡞ࡿ㈨ᩱ࣭ࢹ࣮ࢱࢆ㞟ࡋࠊ ࠕ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨ホ౯ጤဨࠖሗ࿌ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ ࠕ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨ホ ౯ጤဨࠖࡣࠊࡑࢀࢆࡶᏛయࡢ≧ἣࡘ࠸࡚Ⅼ᳨࣭ホ౯ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯ࡢ⤖ᯝࡣࠕ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨ホ౯ሗ࿌᭩ࠖࡋ࡚ᏊࡲࡵࠊᏛ࣮࣒࣮࣍࣌ ࢪබ⾲ࡍࡿඹᅗ᭩㤋㓄ᯫࡋࠊ㜀ぴ౪ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋࡲࡓࠊ ࠕ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨ホ౯ሗ࿌᭩ࠖࡣࠊ ሗ࿌᭩㸦ᩥ❶㸧ᙧᘧࡸࢩ࣮ࢺ㸦⾲㸧ᙧᘧ࡛సᡂࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯ࡢ⤖ᯝࡋ࡚ࠊᨵၿྲྀ⤌ࡲ࡞ࡃ࡚ࡣ࡞ࡽ࡞࠸㡯ࡀ࠶ࡿሙྜࡣࠊᢸᙜ ࡍࡿ㒊⨫ࡀᨵၿྲྀ⤌ࡳࠊࡑࡢάື⤖ᯝࡶྵࡵ࡚ḟᅇࡢ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯࡛☜ㄆࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ 79 ࠙ཧ⪃ࠚሗ࿌᭩㸦ᩥ❶㸧ᙧᘧࡢ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨ホ౯ሗ࿌᭩㸦ᵝᘧ㸧 ➨ ❶ ⌮ᛕᩍ⫱◊✲⤌⧊ 㸬ᘓᏛࡢ⌮ᛕ 㸫㸫㸦㸧⌧≧ࡢㄝ᫂ ۑۑۑۑۑۑۑۑۑۑۑۑۑۑۑۑۑۑۑۑۑۑۑۑۑۑۑۑۑۑۑۑۑۑ ۑۑۑۑۑۑۑۑۑۑۑۑۑۑۑۑۑۑۑۑۑۑۑۑۑۑۑۑۑۑۑۑۑۑۑ 㸫㸫㸦㸧⮬ᕫホ౯ ڹڹڹڹڹڹڹڹڹڹڹڹڹڹڹڹڹڹڹڹڹڹڹڹڹڹڹڹڹڹڹڹڹڹ ڹڹڹڹڹڹڹڹڹڹڹڹڹڹڹڹڹڹڹڹڹڹڹڹڹڹڹڹڹڹڹڹڹڹڹ 㸫㸫㸦㸧ᨵၿ࣭ྥୖ᪉⟇㸦ᑗ᮶ィ⏬㸧 ࠙ཧ⪃ࠚࢩ࣮ࢺ㸦⾲㸧ᙧᘧࡢ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨ホ౯ሗ࿌᭩㸦ᵝᘧ㸧 Ⅼ᳨㡯┠ ⌧≧ࡢㄝ᫂ ⮬ᕫホ౯ ᨵၿ࣭ྥୖ᪉⟇㸦ᑗ᮶ィ⏬㸧 ەەەە ۑۑۑۑۑۑۑۑۑۑ ڹڹڹڹڹڹڹڹ ەەەە ۑۑۑۑۑۑۑۑۑۑ ڹڹڹڹڹڹڹڹ ࣭ ࣭ ࣭ ࣭ 㸬⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯ࡢ㡯┠ࡘ࠸࡚ 㻌 ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯ࡢ㡯┠ࡘ࠸࡚ࡣࠊホ౯ᶵᵓࡢᏛホ౯ᇶ‽ࢆཧ⪃⊂⮬ࡢ㡯┠ࢆタᐃ ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋࡲࡓࠊᏛࡋ࡚⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯ࡍࡿ⠊ᅖࡸホ౯ࡍࡁᑐ㇟ࢆ᫂☜ࡍࡿࡓࡵ Ꮫࡢ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯ࡢ㡯┠ࡢ❧࡚᪉ࡘ࠸࡚ࡶཧ⪃ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ࡞࠾ࠊẖᖺࠊ ࠕ⮬ᕫ Ⅼ᳨ホ౯ጤဨࠖ࠾࠸࡚㡯┠ࡢぢ┤ࡋࢆ⾜ࡗ࡚࠾ࡾࠊホ౯ᶵᵓࡢᖹᡂ 24(2012)ᖺᗘ࠾ ࡅࡿᏛホ౯ᇶ‽ࡢᨵゞేࡏࡓ㡯┠ࡢኚ᭦ࡘ࠸࡚ࡶ᳨ウࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ Ꮫࡢ᪥ᖖⓗ࡞⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯ࡘ࠸࡚ࠊㄆドホ౯ཷᑂ๓ࡣ 3 ᖺ 1 ᗘᐇࡋ࡚࠸ࡓࠋ ㄆドホ౯ࢆ⤒࡚ࠊᏛࡢ⌧≧ࢆ㐺ษᢕᥱࡋࠊᑗ᮶ᵓࢆᥥࡃࡓࡵ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯ࡢᐇ ࢧࢡࣝࡢぢ┤ࡋࢆ⾜ࡗࡓࠋලయⓗࡣࠊ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯ࡢ㡯┠ࢆᑗ᮶ィ⏬ࡢᐇ⌧せ ࡍࡿᮇ㛫࡛ศ㢮ࡋࠊ༢ᖺᗘ࡛ᐇ⌧ࡀྍ⬟࡞㡯┠ࡘ࠸࡚ࡣẖᖺࠊᐇࡍࡿࡇࡋࡓࠋ࡞ ࠾ࠊ୰㛗ᮇⓗ࡞ᮇ㛫ࢆせࡍࡿ㡯┠ࢆྵࡴ࡚ࡢ㡯┠ࡢ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯ࡣ 3 ᖺ 1 ᗘᐇࡋ ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ 㸬ㄆドホ౯࠾ࡅࡿྲྀ⤌ࡳ 80 Ꮫࡣࠊᖹᡂ 20(2008)ᖺᗘホ౯ᶵ ᵓࡢᐇࡍࡿㄆドホ౯ࢆཷᑂࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ ㄆドホ౯ࡢࡓࡵࡢ⮬ᕫホ౯ࡣࠊ࣮࣡࢟ ࣥࢢࢢ࣮ࣝࣉࢆタ⨨ࡋ࡚ᐇࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ ⮬ᕫホ౯ሗ࿌᭩ࢆసᡂࡍࡿ㝿ࡣࠊ Ꮫࡢ⮬ᕫホ౯ሗ࿌᭩ࡢ㡯┠࡞ࢆཧ ⪃ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ ㄆドホ౯⤖ᯝࡘ࠸࡚ࡣࠊ⌮ࠊ ᩍᤵሗ࿌ࡍࡿࡶࠊホ౯ሗ࿌ ᭩ࡢᏛ࣮࣒࣮࣍࣌ࢪ࡛ࡢᥖ㍕࡞ࡼࡾ࿘▱ࢆ⾜ࡗ࡚࠸ࡿࠋࡲࡓࠊ⮬ᕫホ౯ሗ࿌᭩ࡘ ࠸࡚ࡣᏛ࣮࣒࣮࣍࣌ࢪࡢᥖ㍕ࡸᏊࡋ࡚ห⾜ࡋࠊ㛵ಀ⪅㓄ࡍࡿ࡞ࡼࡾ࿘▱ ࢆᅗࡗ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ ㄆドホ౯ࢆཷᑂࡋࡓ㝿ࡢᣦ㡯ࡘ࠸࡚ࡣࠊࡑࡢෆᐜᛂࡌ࡚ࠕ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨ホ౯ጤဨࠖ ࡢጤဨࡀᡤᒓࡋ࡚࠸ࡿྛ✀ࡢጤဨሗ࿌ࢆ⾜࠸ࠊᨵၿ⟇ࢆ᳨ウࡋࠊᐇࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋࡑࡢ ⤖ᯝࡣࠊḟᅇࡢᏛ⊂⮬ࡢࠕ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨ホ౯ሗ࿌᭩ࠖグ㍕ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ 㸬⤌⧊ⓗ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯ྲྀ⤌ࡴࡇࡢ㔜せᛶ ㄆドホ౯ཷᑂࡣࠊࡍ࡛Ꮫࡢ᪥ᖖⓗ࡞⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯ࢆ⾜࠺ࠕ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨ホ౯ጤဨ ࠖࡣタ⨨ࡋ࡚࠸ࡓࡀࠊึࡵ࡚ࡢㄆドホ౯ࡢཷᑂ࡛࠶ࡗࡓࡇࡶ࠶ࡾࠊ㏻ᖖࡢ⤌⧊యࡣ ูࡢㄆドホ౯⏝ࡢ࣮࣡࢟ࣥࢢࢢ࣮ࣝࣉࢆタࡅࠊ㏻ᖖࡼࡾࡶᑡேᩘయไ࡛⮬ᕫホ౯ྲྀ⤌ࢇ ࡔࠋࡑࡢࡓࡵࠊ⮬ᕫホ౯άືࡘ࠸࡚ࡢᏛᩍ⫋ဨࡢሗࡢඹ᭷ࡀᚲࡎࡋࡶ༑ศ࡛࡞࠸ Ⅼࡀ࠶ࡗࡓࠋ ࡇࡢࡇࡽᏛࡣ⤌⧊యࡋ࡚⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯ྲྀ⤌ࡴࡇࡢ㔜せᛶࢆᨵࡵ࡚ㄆ ㆑ࡋࠊㄆドホ౯ࡢࡓࡵࡢ⮬ᕫホ౯࡛࠶ࡗ࡚ࡶ㏻ᖖࡢ⤌⧊య࡛ྲྀ⤌ࡴࡇࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋࡲࡓࠊ Ꮫࡢ᪥ᖖⓗ࡞⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯ࡘ࠸࡚ࡶከࡃࡢᩍ⫋ဨࡀࡑࡢ㐣⛬㛵ࢃࢀࡿࡼ࠺ࡍࡿ ࡓࡵጤဨ༢࡛ᐇࡍࡿࡇࡋࠊ ࠕ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨ホ౯ሗ࿌᭩ࠖࡣᏛࡢᩍ⫋ဨࡢ⥲ពᇶ ࡙࠸࡚సᡂࡍࡿ᪉ἲࢆᶍ⣴ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ ی㜰ၟᴗᏛࡢᴫἣ㸦ᖹᡂ ᖺᖺ ᭶ ᪥⌧ᅾ㸧 ࠙㛤タᖺᗘࠚ 24(1949)ᖺᗘ ࠙ᡤᅾᆅࠚ 㜰ᗓᮾ㜰ᕷᚚཔᰤ⏫ 4-1-10 ࠙Ꮫ㒊࣭◊✲⛉ࠚ 81 Ꮫ㒊࣭◊✲⛉ Ꮫ⛉࣭◊✲⛉ᑓᨷ ⤒῭Ꮫ㒊 ⤒῭Ꮫ⛉ ⥲ྜ⤒ႠᏛ㒊 ⤒ႠᏛ⛉ࠊၟᏛ⛉ࠊබඹ⤒ႠᏛ⛉ ᆅᇦᨻ⟇Ꮫ◊✲⛉ ᆅᇦ⤒῭ᨻ⟇ᑓᨷࠊ⤒Ⴀ㠉᪂ᑓᨷ ࠙ゼၥ᪥ࠚ ᖹᡂ 24(2012)ᖺ 4 ᭶ 11 ᪥ ࠙㠃ㄯ⪅ࠚ ᖖᒸ ⿱அ Ặ Ꮫᰯἲே㇂ᒸᏛᅬ ⌮ࠊἲேᮏ㒊㛗 ᯘ 㐍୍ Ặ 㜰ၟᴗᏛ ᩍົㄢ㛗 ᒣ㷂 ᩗ♸ Ặ 㜰ၟᴗᏛ ົᒁ㛗ᐊ ࢳ࣮ࣇ Ọ⸨ ⿱Ꮚ Ặ Ꮫᰯἲே㇂ᒸᏛᅬ ἲேᮏ㒊 ⥲ົㄢ ࢳ࣮ࣇ ࠙ゼၥ⪅ࠚ 㝣 㚝᪳ ホ౯ᴗ㒊ḟ㛗 ኳὠ ᠇ ホ౯ᴗ㒊ホ౯◊✲ㄢಀ㛗 82 㛵すᅜ㝿Ꮫ ࠙ᖹᡂ ᖺᗘཷᑂࠚ ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯άືࡢྲྀ⤌ࡳ Ꮫࡣࠊ㛤タᖺᗘ࡛࠶ࡿᖹᡂ 10(1998) ᖺᗘࡽᏛෆࡢ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯ࢆᐇࡋ ࡚࠸ࡿࠋᙜึࡣ⮬ᕫホ౯ጤဨ࠾࠸࡚ タᐃࡋࡓᇶ‽ᇶ࡙ࡁ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯ά ືࢆ⾜ࡗ࡚࠸ࡓࡀࠊᖹᡂ 17(2005)ᖺᗘ ㄆドホ౯ཷᑂࢆぢᤣ࠼࡚ホ౯ᶵᵓࡢᏛホ౯ᇶ‽ἢࡗ࡚ሗ࿌᭩ࢆసᡂࡋࡓࠋ࡞࠾ࠊᖹᡂ 18(2006)ᖺᗘࡽࡣࠕ㒊ᒁ┠ᶆタᐃホ౯ࢩ࣮ࢺࠖࢆᑟධࡋࠊ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯ࢆẖᖺᗘᐇ ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ ࠕ㒊ᒁ┠ᶆタᐃホ౯ࢩ࣮ࢺࠖࡣࠊண⟬ࡀᇳ⾜ࡉࢀࡿ㒊ᒁ༢ࡈᵝᘧࡀ㓄ࡉࢀࠊྛ 㒊ᒁ࠾࠸࡚ẖᖺసᡂࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋసᡂࡉࢀࡓࢩ࣮ࢺࡣࠊྛ㒊ᒁࡔࡅ࡛࡞ࡃࠊᑓ௵ᩍဨဨ ࡀ౪ぴ࡛ࡁࡿࡼ࠺ࡋ࡚ࠊᏛෆ࡛ࡢሗࡢඹ᭷ࢆᅗࡗ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ ࢩ࣮ࢺࡣࠊ㡯┠ࡈࠊ⌧≧ᮇᚅࠊၥ㢟Ⅼࠊㄢ㢟ࠊάືᴗࡢෆᐜࠊ⤖ᯝホ౯ࠊ ⤌⧊┠ᶆࡢ㛵㐃ᛶࡘ࠸࡚ࡢグ㏙ḍࡀタࡅࡽࢀ࡚࠸ࡿࠋࢩ࣮ࢺࡲࡵࡿࡇࡼࡾࠊ ⮬ࡽࡢ⌧≧ㄢ㢟ࡀ᫂☜࡞ࡿࡶࠊၥ㢟ព㆑ࡢඹ᭷ࢆᅗࡿࡇࡀ࡛ࡁ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ ྛ㒊ᒁࡣࠊ๓ᖺᗘᮎࡲ࡛ࢩ࣮ࢺࡢཎࢆసᡂࡋࠊᖺᗘ᫂ࡅᏛ㛗ࡢㄝ᫂㸦ࣈ࣮ࣜࣇ ࣥࢢ㸧ࢆ⾜ࡗࡓ࠺࠼࡛ෆᐜࢆ☜ᐃࡉࡏࡿࠋࡑࡢᚋࠊ9 ᭶ࡲ࡛ࡢάື≧ἣࢆࢩ࣮ࢺࡲ ࡵ୰㛫ሗ࿌ࡋ࡚⮬ᕫホ౯ጤဨᥦฟࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ⮬ᕫホ౯ጤဨ࡛ࡣࠊྛ㒊ᒁࡀタᐃࡋ ࡓㄢ㢟ࡢ㐩ᡂ≧ἣࢆ☜ㄆࡋࠊࡑࢀᑐࡋ࡚ࡢㅮホࢆྛ㒊ᒁࣇ࣮ࢻࣂࢵࢡࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ᭱ ⤊ⓗࡣࠊᖺᗘᮎࡧ⾜ࢃࢀࡿᏛ㛗ࡢࣈ࣮ࣜࣇࣥࢢ࠾࠸࡚ࠊ1 ᖺ㛫ࡢάືሗ࿌ࢆ ࢩ࣮ࢺᇶ࡙࠸࡚⾜ࡗ࡚࠸ࡿࠋࡇࡢࡼ࠺ࠕ㒊ᒁ┠ᶆタᐃホ౯ࢩ࣮ࢺࠖࡣࠊྛ㒊ᒁ࠾ࡅ ࡿ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯άືࡢάᛶά⏝ࡉࢀࡿᴗົ⟶⌮ࡢ㈨ᩱࡋ࡚ࡢᙺࡶᢸࡗ࡚࠸ ࡿࠋ ࡲࡓࠊ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯ࡢෆᐜࢆྲྀࡾࡲࡵ⮬ᕫホ౯ሗ࿌᭩ࢆసᡂࡍࡿ㝿ࡶࠕ㒊ᒁ┠ᶆ タᐃホ౯ࢩ࣮ࢺࠖࢆ᭷ຠά⏝ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ⮬ᕫホ౯ሗ࿌᭩ࡢᇳ➹ࡣࠊ⮬ᕫホ౯ጤဨࡀࡑ ࡢᴗົ࠶ࡓࡗ࡚࠾ࡾࠊ ྛ㒊ᒁࡀ 9 ᭶ᥦฟࡋࡓ୰㛫ሗ࿌ࡢ⤖ᯝࢆ㋃ࡲ࠼࡚ཎࢆసᡂࡋࠊ ᖺᗘᮎࡢࠕ㒊ᒁ┠ᶆタᐃホ౯ࢩ࣮ࢺࠖࡢෆᐜᇶ࡙ࡁࠊᙜヱᖺᗘࡢ⮬ᕫホ౯ሗ࿌᭩ࢆᡂ ࡉࡏࡿࠋሗ࿌᭩సᡂ࠾࠸࡚ࡑࡢ᰿ᣐ࡞ࡿሗࡢᵝᘧཬࡧᇳ➹㒊㛛ࢆ୍ඖࡍࡿࡇ࡛ࠊ ሗ࿌᭩సᡂࡿㄪᩚࡢᡭ㛫ࡸ㛫ࡢ๐ῶࡶ⧅ࡀࡗ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ ⮬ᕫホ౯ጤဨホ౯ᐊ Ꮫࡢ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯ࡣࠊ⮬ᕫホ౯ጤဨホ౯ᐊࡢ 2 ࡘࡢ⤌⧊ࢆ㐃ᦠࡉࡏᐇࡋ࡚࠸ ࡿࠋ⮬ᕫホ౯ጤဨࡣࠊᏛ㛗ࠊ㧗➼ᩍ⫱◊✲㛤Ⓨࢭࣥࢱ࣮㛗ࠊᩍົ㒊㛗ࠊົᒁ㛗ࠊ Ꮫ㝔◊✲⛉ጤဨࡢጤဨࠊホ౯ᐊḟ㛗࡞ࢆྵࡵ࡚ 7ࠊ8 ே࡛ᵓᡂࡋ࡚࠾ࡾࠊᏛෆࡢ⮬ᕫ Ⅼ᳨࣭ホ౯ࡢ⏬ࠊᐇཬࡧሗ࿌᭩ࡢసᡂࢆ⾜ࡗ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ 83 ホ౯ᐊࡣࠊ⮬ᕫホ౯ጤဨ㛗ࡀホ౯ᐊ㛗ࢆົࡵࠊᏛ㛗ࡽࡢࢆཷࡅ࡚⮬ᕫホ౯ጤဨࡀ ᐇࡍࡿ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯㛵ࢃࡿᏛෆࢹ࣮ࢱࢆ㞟ࡋࠊసᡂࡍࡿ࡞ࡢᴗົ࠶ࡓࡿࠊ ྛ㒊ᒁⅬᅾࡋ࡚࠸ࡿሗࢆ㞟ࡵࠊࡑࡢሗᇶ࡙࠸࡚ศᯒࡋࡓ⤖ᯝ࡞ࢆᏛෆᥦ౪ࡋࠊ ▱ぢࢆᗈࡵࡿ࡞ IR(Institutional Research)ᶵ⬟ࢆᢸࡗ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ 㛵すᅜ㝿Ꮫ⮬ᕫホ౯యไ Ꮫ㛗 ᩍᤵ ⮬ᕫホ౯ ጤဨ ホ౯ᐊ 䠄⮬ᕫホ౯䛾⏬䚸 㐠Ⴀ䚸ᑂ㆟䠅 䠄ホ౯䝕䞊䝍䛾㞟䞉ศᯒ䠅 ホ ౯ 吞 呎 吖 AᏛ⛉ BᏛ⛉ C㒊ᒁ 䞉䞉䞉 䠄ྛ㒊ᒁ➼䛾PDCA䛻ᇶ䛵䛝⮬ᕫホ౯䠅 ⌧ᅾࠊࢹ࣮ࢱ࣮࣋ࢫࢆᑟධࡋࠊᏛࡢ㐃ᦠࡢࡶᏛ⩦ᨭᆺࡢIRᶵ⬟ࡢᵓ⠏ࢆ㐍ࡵ ࡚࠸ࡿࡇࢁ࡛࠶ࡿࠋホ౯ᐊࡀศᯒࡋࡓ⤖ᯝࡣࠊᚲせᛂࡌ࡚FD(Faculty Development) ◊ಟ࡚ሗ࿌ࡉࢀࠊᏛ㛗ࡽࡢ౫㢗ࡼࡾᏛෆⓎಙࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ ⌧ẁ㝵ࡢศᯒసᴗࡣࠊᏛ⩦ᨭ㛵ࡍࡿㄢ㢟Ⓨぢࡲࡗ࡚࠸ࡿࡀࠊᚋࡣᏛ⩦ᡂᯝ ࡢ ᐃࡸᏛ㐠Ⴀ㛵ࢃࡿศ㔝ࡘ࠸࡚ࡶྲྀ⤌ࡴணᐃ࡛࠶ࡿࠋࡲࡓࠊㄪᰝ౫㢗ࡢ᪉ἲࡸศ ᯒ⤖ᯝࡢබ⾲᪉ἲ࡞ࡶᩚഛࡋࠊ⤌⧊ⓗ࡞☜❧ࢆ┠ᣦࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ ࠕ㒊ᒁ┠ᶆタᐃホ౯ࢩ࣮ࢺࠖࡢ᭦࡞ࡿά⏝ ᚑ᮶ࠊ ࠕ㒊ᒁ┠ᶆタᐃホ౯ࢩ࣮ࢺࠖࡣࠊἲேᮏ㒊ࡼࡿண⟬ཬࡧᴗィ⏬సᡂࡢࡓࡵࡢཧ ⪃㈨ᩱࡋ࡚ࡶ⏝ࡉࢀ࡚ࡁࡓ⤒⦋ࡶ࠶ࡾࠊᖹᡂ 24(2012)ᖺᗘࡽࡣẖᖺ 9 ᭶ᐇࡋ࡚ ࠸ࡿ୰㛫ሗ࿌ࡢᶵࢆ⏝ࡋࠊྛ㒊ᒁࡀⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯ᇶ࡙࠸࡚ḟᖺᗘࡢ┠ᶆタᐃཬࡧண⟬ ⏦ㄳࡍࡿࡼ࠺ኚ᭦ࡍࡿࠋࡋࡋࠊ ࠕ㒊ᒁ┠ᶆタᐃホ౯ࢩ࣮ࢺࠖᇶ࡙ࡃⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯ࡢ࿘ᮇࡣࠊ ண⟬ィୖࡢࢱ࣑ࣥࢢ␗࡞ࡿⅬࡀ࠶ࡿ࡞ண⟬⏦ㄳࡢ㐃ືࡘ࠸࡚ㄢ㢟ࢆṧࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ ࡲࡓࠊẖᖺᏛ㛗ࡀタᐃࡍࡿࠕ⤌⧊ࡢᖺ㛫┠ᶆࠖࡢ㐃ືࡶᚋࡢㄢ㢟ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ⌧ᅾࠊ Ꮫ㛗ࡢࣈ࣮ࣜࣇࣥࢢࡼࡾ⤌⧊ࡢᖺ㛫┠ᶆྛ㒊ᒁࡢ┠ᶆࡢ㐃ືࡣྍ⬟࡞ࡗ࡚࠸ ࡿࡀࠊᮏ᮶ࠊ⤌⧊ࡢᖺ㛫┠ᶆࡀලయࡋࡓࡶࡢࡀྛ㒊ᒁࡢ┠ᶆ࡛࠶ࡿࡁ࡛࠶ࡿࡋࠊ ࠕ㒊 ᒁ┠ᶆタᐃホ౯ࢩ࣮ࢺࠖࡢᚋࡢά⏝᪉ἲࡘ࠸᳨࡚ウࢆ⥆ࡅ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ ㄆドホ౯⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯άື Ꮫࡣࠊᖹᡂ 20(2008)ᖺᗘホ౯ᶵᵓࡀᐇࡍࡿㄆドホ౯ࢆཷᑂࡋࡓࠋホ౯ᶵᵓࡼࡾᣦ ࡉࢀࡓ㡯ࡘ࠸࡚ࡣࠊ⮬ᕫホ౯ሗ࿌᭩ᣲࡆࡓᨵၿྥୖ᪉⟇ࡢෆᐜࡶ⩣ᖺࡢᖹ ᡂ 21(2009)ᖺᗘ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯ࢆᐇࡋࡓࠋ⮬ࡽᣲࡆࡓᨵၿྥୖ᪉⟇ࡶホ౯ᶵᵓࡽᣦ ࡉࢀࡓ㡯ࡶࠊ࡚ྵࡵ࡚Ꮫࡢㄢ㢟࡛࠶ࡿ࠸࠺ㄆ㆑ࡢࡶࠊ⮬ᕫホ౯ጤဨࡽᨵ ၿྲྀ⤌ࡴࡁ㡯┠ࢆヱᙜࡍࡿ㒊ᒁఏ࠼ࠊࡍࡄᨵၿ╔ᡭࡋࡓࠋ 84 ྲྀ⤌ࡳ⤖ᯝࡘ࠸࡚ࡣࠊ⮬ᕫホ౯ጤဨࡀᙜヱᖺᗘసᡂࡋࡓ⮬ᕫホ౯ሗ࿌᭩ྲྀࡾࡲ ࡵࠊᩍᤵ࠾࠸࡚≧ἣࢆㄝ᫂ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋࡲࡓࠊ⤖ᯝࢆ㋃ࡲ࠼࡚ࠊ⮬ᕫホ౯ጤဨࡽ ᭦࡞ࡿྲྀ⤌ࡳࡀᚲせ࡛࠶ࡿᣦࢆࡋࡓࡀࠊヱᙜࡍࡿ㒊ᒁಶูࢥ࣓ࣥࢺࢆࡍࡿࡼ࠺࡞ ලయⓗ࡞ྲྀ⤌ࡳࡲ࡛⮳ࡽ࡞ࡗࡓࡓࡵࠊᚋࡣᨵၿࡋ࡚࠸ࡃ᪉㔪࡛࠶ࡿࠋ ホ౯ᶵᵓࡀᖹᡂ 24(2012)ᖺᗘࡽᐇࡍࡿ᪂ࡋ࠸Ꮫホ౯ᇶ‽ᇶ࡙ࡁࠊᏛࡣ᪤⮬ ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯άືࢆᐇࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋࡑࢀࡒࢀࡢᇶ‽㡯┠࠾࠸࡚ࠕ⌧≧ࠖ ࠕホ౯ࠖࡑࡋ࡚ࠕㄢ 㢟ࠖ࠸࠺ὶࢀ࡛ሗ࿌᭩ࢆࡲࡵ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ ㄆドホ౯ཷᑂࡢ㝿ࠊ୰ᚰ࡞ࡗ࡚ྲྀ⤌ࢇࡔ⮬ ᕫホ౯ጤဨࡢ❧ሙࡽぢ࡚ࠊㄆドホ౯ཷᑂࡀ ຠᯝⓗ࡛࠶ࡗࡓࡇࡢ୍ࡘሗ࿌᭩సᡂᑐࡍ ࡿᩍ⫋ဨࡢព㆑ࡢኚࡀᣲࡆࡽࢀࡿࠋᏛෆእၥ ࢃࡎࠊㄡࡀㄞࢇ࡛ࡶ⌮ゎ࡛ࡁࡿࡼ࠺࡞ᖹ࡛᫆ࠊ ⡆₩࡞ᩥ❶ࢆࡶሗ࿌᭩ࢆグ㏙ࡍࡿࡇࢆព ㆑ࡍࡿࡼ࠺࡞ࡾࠊᏛෆࡢ≧ἣࢆṇ☜ఏ࠼ࡿ ࡇࡀ࡛ࡁ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ ࡲࡓࠊㄆドホ౯ཷᑂࢆ㏻ࡋ࡚Ꮫෆࡢ≧ἣࡘ࠸࡚ࡼࡾ῝ࡃᢕᥱ࡛ࡁࡓࡇࡶࡑࡢ୍ࡘ ᣲࡆࡽࢀࡿࠋ⮬ᕫホ౯ሗ࿌᭩ᑐࡍࡿ㉁ၥࡢᅇ⟅࠶ࡓࡾࠊᏛෆࡢྛ㛵ಀ⪅ࡢᑐヰࡀ ቑ࠼ࠊ⤌⧊ࡸつᐃࢆᨵࡵ࡚ㄪ┤ࡍࡇ࡛ࠊἲ௧㛵ಀࡢ▱㆑ࡀ῝ࡲࡿࡶᏛෆࡢᵝ Ꮚࢆ⌮ゎࡍࡿࡇࡀ࡛ࡁࡓࠋ⮬ᕫホ౯ጤဨࡢ㛗ࡋ࡚ࠊࡇࡢ⤒㦂ࢆࡢࡼ࠺ࡇࢀࡽ ࡢ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯άືᫎࡋ࡚࠸ࡃࢆᚋࡢㄢ㢟ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ ی㛵すᅜ㝿Ꮫࡢᴫἣ㸦ᖹᡂ ᖺᖺ ᭶ ᪥⌧ᅾ㸧 ࠙㛤タᖺᗘࠚ ᖹᡂ 10(1998)ᖺᗘ ࠙ᡤᅾᆅࠚ රᗜ┴୕ᮌᕷᚿᰁ⏫㟷ᒣ 1-18㸦୕ᮌ࢟ࣕࣥࣃࢫ㸧 රᗜ┴ᑽᓮᕷ₻Ụ 1-3-23㸦ᑽᓮ࢟ࣕࣥࣃࢫ㸧 ࠙Ꮫ㒊࣭◊✲⛉ࠚ Ꮫ㒊࣭◊✲⛉ Ꮫ⛉࣭◊✲⛉ᑓᨷ ᩍ⫱Ꮫ㒊 ᩍ⫱⚟♴Ꮫ⛉ ⱥㄒᩍ⫱Ꮫ⛉ ே㛫⛉Ꮫ㒊 ே㛫ᚰ⌮Ꮫ⛉ ⤒ႠᏛ⛉ ࣅࢪࢿࢫ⾜ືᏛ⛉ ே㛫⾜ືᏛ◊✲⛉ ே㛫⾜ືᏛᑓᨷ 85 ࠙ゼၥ᪥ࠚ ᖹᡂ 24(2012)ᖺ 3 ᭶ 14 ᪥ ࠙㠃ㄯ⪅ࠚ ⸨ᮌ Ύ Ặ Ꮫ㛗⿵బ࣭⮬ᕫホ౯ጤဨጤဨ㛗 ே㛫⛉Ꮫ㒊⤒ႠᏛ⛉ᩍᤵ ࠙ゼၥ⪅ࠚ 㝣 㚝᪳ ホ౯ᴗ㒊ḟ㛗 ᯈᇉ ᬛ㤶 ホ౯ᴗ㒊ホ౯◊✲ㄢ௵ 86 ༓ⴥᕤᴗᏛ ࠙ᖹᡂ ᖺᗘཷᑂࠚ ➨୕⪅ホ౯ࢆά⏝ࡋࡓ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯άື ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯ࡣࠊᖹᡂ 3(1991)ᖺ௨㝆 6 ᅇ⾜ࡗ࡚ࡁ ࡓࠋᖹᡂ 20(2008)ᖺᗘㄆドホ౯ࡢཷᑂᙜࡓࡗ࡚ࠊ⮬ᕫ Ⅼ᳨࣭ホ౯㛵ࡍࡿつ⛬ࢆᖜぢ┤ࡋࠊ⌧ᅾࡣ⮬ᕫⅬ ᳨࣭ホ౯ጤဨࢆ୰ᚰ⾜ࡗ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ ࡑࡢつ⛬࡛ࡣࠊ3 ᖺࡈ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯ࢆ⾜࠺ࡇ ࡋ࡚࠾ࡾࠊࡑࡢ㒔ᗘጤဨࡀタ⨨ࡉࢀࡿࠋጤဨࡢ ࣓ࣥࣂ࣮ࡣᩍ⫱⫋ဨົ⫋ဨࡀ 5 ேࡎࡘࡢィ 10 ே⛬ ᗘ࡛ᵓᡂࡉࢀࠊᩍ⫱⫋ဨࡀጤဨ㛗ࢆົࡵ࡚࠸ࡿࠋᖹᡂ 23(2011)ᖺᗘᐇࡋࡓ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ ホ౯ࡣ๓ᅇཷᑂࡋࡓホ౯ᶵᵓࡢ 11 ࡢᇶ‽ࢆࡶᐇࡋࡓࠋྛᇶ‽ᑐᛂ࡛ࡁࡿࡼ࠺ᩍ ဨഃࡣᩍົጤဨ㛗ࠊᏛ⏕ጤဨ㛗ࠊ⫋ဨഃ࡛ࡣ㈈ົࠊ⥲ົ࡞ࡢᢸᙜ⪅ࢆጤဨࡋࡓࠋ ἲᚊ࡛つᐃࡉࢀ࡚࠸ࡿ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ 㻌 䛆ཧ⪃ 㻝䛇㻶㻭㻮㻱㻱 䜈䛾ྲྀ⤌䜏㻌 ౯ࡸㄆドホ౯ࡢࠊᏛࡣ JABEE 㻌 㻌 ᕤᏛ㒊㻌 㸦᪥ᮏᢏ⾡⪅ᩍ⫱ㄆᐃᶵᵓ㸧ࡸ R&I 㻌 ᶵᲔ䝃䜲䜶䞁䝇Ꮫ⛉㻌 ᶵᲔタィ䞉㛤Ⓨ䝁䞊䝇㻌 㸦ᰴᘧ♫᱁ᢞ㈨ሗࢭࣥࢱ࣮㸧࡞ 㻌 㟁Ẽ㟁ᏊሗᕤᏛ⛉㻌 ⥲ྜ䝅䝇䝔䝮ᕤᏛ䝁䞊䝇㻌 ࡢ➨୕⪅ホ౯ࢆ✚ᴟⓗཷᑂࡍࡿࡇ ࡼࡗ࡚ྛᏛ⛉ࡢᏛ⏕ᑐᛂࡸ࢝ࣜ࢟ 㻌 ⏕⎔ቃ⛉Ꮫ⛉㻌 ⎔ቃᡂᕤᏛ䝁䞊䝇㻌 㻌 ᘓ⠏㒔ᕷ⎔ቃᏛ⛉㻌 ᘓ⠏㒔ᕷ䜶䞁䝆䝙䜰䝸䞁䜾䝁䞊䝇㻌 㻌 㻌 ሗ⛉Ꮫ㒊㻌 㻌 ࣒ࣗࣛࡢࢳ࢙ࢵࢡࠊࡲࡓࠊົࡢྛ㒊 㻌 ሗᕤᏛ⛉㻌 ሗᢏ⾡䝁䞊䝇㻌 㛛ࡀࡑࢀࡒࢀࡢᴗົࢆぢ┤ࡍࡇࡀ࡛ 㻌 ሗ䝛䝑䝖䝽䞊䜽Ꮫ⛉㻌 䝛䝑䝖䝽䞊䜽䝁䞊䝇㻌 ࡁ࡚࠸ࡿࠋࡇࡢࡼ࠺➨୕⪅ホ౯ࢆཷ 㻌 㻌 ♫䝅䝇䝔䝮⛉Ꮫ㒊㻌 㻌 㻌 ⤒Ⴀሗ⛉Ꮫ⛉㻌 ⤒Ⴀ䝅䝇䝔䝮䝁䞊䝇㻌 㻌 䝥䝻䝆䜵䜽䝖䝬䝛䝆䝯䞁䝖Ꮫ⛉㻌 ⤒Ⴀ䝅䝇䝔䝮䝁䞊䝇㻌 ࡅ⥆ࡅࡿࡇࡀࠊ⮬ࡽࡢάືࢆⅬ᳨࣭ ホ౯ࡍࡿࡇࡘ࡞ࡀࡗ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ ࡋࡋࠊJABEE ࡞ࡢ➨୕⪅ホ౯ࢆ✚ᴟⓗ 䛆ཧ⪃ 㻞䛇㻾㻒㻵 㛗ᮇඃඛമົ᱁䛡䜈䛾ྲྀ⤌䜏㻌 㻞㻜㻜㻟 ᖺᗘ㻌 㻭㻭㻙㻌 㻞㻜㻜㻠 ᖺᗘ㻌 㻭㻭㻙㻌 㻞㻜㻜㻡 ᖺᗘ㻌 㻭㻭㻙㼇Ᏻᐃⓗ㼉㻌 ⓗᩚ⌮ࡋ࡚࠸ࡃᚲせࡀ࠶ࡿࠋᶵ㛵ูホ౯Ꮫ⛉ 㻞㻜㻜㻢 ᖺᗘ㻌 㻭㻭㻙㼇Ᏻᐃⓗ㼉㻌 ༢ࡢಶูホ౯ࡢ㛵ಀࢆᩍဨ⤌⧊యࡀඹ᭷ࡋ࡞ 㻞㻜㻜㻣 ᖺᗘ㻌 㻭㻭㻙㼇Ᏻᐃⓗ㼉㻌 ࡅࢀࡤホ౯⤖ᯝࢆ᭷ຠά⏝࡛ࡁ࡞࠸ࡢ࡛ࠊࡑࡢ 㻞㻜㻜㻤 ᖺᗘ㻌 㻭㻭㻙㼇䝛䜺䝔䜱䝤㼉㻌 㻞㻜㻜㻥 ᖺᗘ㻌 㻭㻭㻙㼇䝛䜺䝔䜱䝤㼉㻌 㻞㻜㻝㻜 ᖺᗘ㻌 㻭㻭㻙㼇Ᏻᐃⓗ㼉㻌 㻞㻜㻝㻝 ᖺᗘ㻌 㻭㻭㻙㼇Ᏻᐃⓗ㼉㻌 ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯ά⏝ࡋ࡚࠸ࡃࡓࡵࡣࠊᏛ యࡢ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯➨୕⪅ホ౯ࡢ㛵ಀࢆయ⣔ ⤌ࡳࡢᵓ⠏ࡀᚋࡢㄢ㢟࡛࠶ࡿࠋ Ꮫࡢホ౯⤖ᯝࡢẚ㍑ ㄆドホ౯࠾࠸࡚ࡣࠊᅇࡁ࡞ᨵၿ㡯ࡢᣦࡀ࡞ࡗࡓࡓࡵࠊཷᑂᚋࡣࠊ ࠕࡢࡼ࠺ ࡞㡯ࡀᣦࡢᑐ㇟࡞ࡿࡢࠖ࠸࠺ࡇࢆ୰ᚰᏛࡢホ౯⤖ᯝ≧ἣࢆ☜ㄆࡋ࡚࠸ ࡿࠋࡑࡢ⤖ᯝࠊᏛࡢ⌧≧↷ࡽࡋྜࢃࡏࡿࠊ≧ἣࡼࡗ࡚ࡣᏛ࡛ࡶᣦࡉࢀࡿ㡯 ࡀ࠶ࡿࡇࡀ☜ㄆ࡛ࡁࡓࠋࡑࢀࡽࡘ࠸࡚ࡣᏛෆ࡛༠㆟ࡋࠊᨵၿࢆ㐍ࡵ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ 87 እ㒊ᶵ㛵ࡽࡢᨵၿᣦࡘ࠸࡚ࡣࠊ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯࠾࠸࡚ᨵၿྥୖ᪉⟇ࡋ࡚ᥖࡆ ࡓ㡯ࡼࡾࡶඃඛⓗᨵၿྲྀ⤌ࡲ࡞ࡅࢀࡤ࠸ࡅ࡞࠸㡯࡛࠶ࢁ࠺ࠋࡋࡋ࡞ࡀࡽࠊᏛෆ ࡛ၥ㢟࡞࠸ุ᩿ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿ㡯ࢆእ㒊ࡽᣦࡉࢀࡿሙྜࡶ࠶ࡿࠋࡑࢀࢆᨵၿࡋ࡚࠸ࡃ ࡣᏛෆࡢㄝᚓ㛫ࢆせࡍࡿࡓࡵࠊ᪩ᛴ࡞ᨵၿࡣ㞴ࡋ࠸ࠋࡇࡢࡼ࠺࡞ሙྜࡢᑐᛂࡘ࠸࡚ ࡣᚋ᳨ウࢆࡋ࡚࠸ࡁࡓ࠸ࠋ ホ౯⤖ᯝࡢබ⾲࿘▱ ㄆドホ౯ࡢ⤖ᯝࡘ࠸࡚ࡣࠊᙜヱᏛࡢࡳఏ࠼ࡽࢀࡿᣦ㡯ࡀグ㍕ࡉࢀ࡚࠸ࡿㄪᰝ ሗ࿌᭩ࢆ⌮࡛㓄ࡋ࡚ෆᐜࢆㄝ᫂ࡋࡓࠋᩍᤵࡣㄆᐃࡉࢀࡓ࠸࠺ᐇࡢࡳࢆሗ࿌ ࡋࡓࠋ⌮ࡸᩍဨࡣࠊㄆドホ౯ᶵ㛵ࡽㄆᐃࡉࢀࠊࡁ࡞ᨵၿᣦࡣ࡞ࡗࡓ࠸࠺ㄝ ᫂ࢆ⾜ࡗࡓࡀࠊᨵၿᣦࡀ࡞ࡗࡓࡢ࡛㡪ࡣ࠶ࡲࡾ࡞ࡗࡓࠋ ㄆドホ౯ࢆྲྀࡾࡲࡵࡓᙜ⪅ࡋ࡚ࡣࠊࡦᏳᚰ࠸࠺Ẽᣢࡕࡀ࠶ࡿ㠃ࠊᏛෆࡢᨵ ၿࢆಁࡍ࠸࠺ព࡛ࡣఱࡽࡢᨵၿᣦࡀ࠶ࡗࡓ᪉ࡀຠᯝⓗ࡛࠶ࡗࡓࡢ࡛ࡣࡶ⪃࠼࡚ ࠸ࡿࠋ ホ౯⤖ᯝࡢබ⾲ࡘ࠸࡚ࡣࠊ࣮࣒࣮࣍࣌ࢪ࡛බ⾲ࡍࡿࡶᴗሗ࿌᭩࡞グ㍕ࡋࠊ ಖㆤ⪅࡞࡛ᴫせࢆㄝ᫂ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋࡁ࡞㡪ࡣ࡞࠸ࡶࡢࡢእ㒊ᶵ㛵ࡽࡢࠕㄆᐃࠖ ࠸࠺⤖ᯝࡘ࠸࡚ࡣᏛᑐࡍࡿ⌮ゎࡢ୍ຓ࡞ࡗ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ ホ౯⤖ᯝࡘ࠸࡚ࡣࠊᨵၿᣦࡀ࡞ࡃ‶㊊ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࡀࠊ⤖ᯝࡑࡢࡶࡢࡼࡾࡶࠊᏛయ ࡋ࡚ྲྀ⤌ࢇࡔࡇព⩏ࡀ࠶ࡗࡓࠋࡑࡢ୍ࡘࡢࡋ࡚ࡣࠊࡲ࡛」ᩘࡢ㈨ᩱศᩓࡋ ࡚࠸ࡓෆᐜࡀ 1 ࡢ⮬ᕫホ౯ሗ࿌᭩ࡋ࡚ 100 ࣮࣌ ࢪࡲࡵࡽࢀࡓࡇ࡛࠶ࡿࠋࡇࢀࡼࡾࠊᏛࡢ ≉㛗࡞ࡀㄝ᫂ࡋࡸࡍࡃ࡞ࡗࡓࠋࡲࡓࠊFD ◊ಟ ࡞࠾࠸࡚ࡶࠊᘓᏛࡢ⢭⚄ࡸᩍ⫱┠ᶆ࡞ࢆయ⣔ ⓗㄝ᫂ࡍࡿࡇࡀྍ⬟࡞ࡗࡓࠋ ᚋࡢ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯ࡸㄆドホ౯㛵ࡋ࡚ࡣࠊ⮬ ࡽඃࢀࡓⅬุ᩿࡛ࡁࡿ㒊ศࡸࢭ࣮ࣝࢫ࣏ࣥࢺࢆ ᙉㄪࡋබ⾲ࡍࡿࡇࢆព㆑ࡋࡘࡘࠊሗ࿌᭩グ㏙ࡍ ࡿࡇࡶ᳨ウࡋ࡚࠸ࡁࡓ࠸ࠋ ی༓ⴥᕤᴗᏛࡢᴫἣ㸦ᖹᡂ ᖺᖺ ᭶ ᪥⌧ᅾ㸧 ࠙㛤タᖺᗘࠚ 25(1950)ᖺᗘ ࠙ᡤᅾᆅࠚ ༓ⴥ┴⩦ᚿ㔝ᕷὠ⏣ 2-17-1㸦ὠ⏣࢟ࣕࣥࣃࢫ㸧 ༓ⴥ┴⩦ᚿ㔝ᕷⰪᅬ 2-1-1㸦Ⱚᅬ࢟ࣕࣥࣃࢫ㸧 88 ࠙Ꮫ㒊࣭◊✲⛉ࠚ Ꮫ㒊࣭◊✲⛉ ᕤᏛ㒊 ሗ⛉Ꮫ㒊 ♫ࢩࢫࢸ࣒⛉Ꮫ㒊 Ꮫ⛉࣭◊✲⛉ᑓᨷ ᶵᲔࢧ࢚ࣥࢫᏛ⛉ 㟁Ẽ㟁ᏊሗᕤᏛ⛉ ⏕⎔ቃ⛉Ꮫ⛉ ᘓ⠏㒔ᕷ⎔ቃᏛ⛉ ࢹࢨࣥ⛉Ꮫ⛉ ᮍ᮶ࣟ࣎ࢸࢡࢫᏛ⛉ ሗᕤᏛ⛉ ሗࢿࢵࢺ࣮࣡ࢡᏛ⛉ ⤒Ⴀሗ⛉Ꮫ⛉ ࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺ࣐ࢿࢪ࣓ࣥࢺᏛ⛉ 㔠⼥࣭⤒Ⴀࣜࢫࢡ⛉Ꮫ⛉ ᶵᲔࢧ࢚ࣥࢫᑓᨷ 㟁Ẽ㟁ᏊሗᕤᏛᑓᨷ ⏕⎔ቃ⛉Ꮫᑓᨷ ᕤᏛ◊✲⛉ ᘓ⠏㒔ᕷ⎔ቃᏛᑓᨷ ࢹࢨࣥ⛉Ꮫᑓᨷ ᮍ᮶ࣟ࣎ࢸࢡࢫᑓᨷ ᕤᏛᑓᨷ ሗ⛉Ꮫ◊✲⛉ ሗ⛉Ꮫᑓᨷ ♫ࢩࢫࢸ࣒⛉Ꮫ◊✲⛉ ࣐ࢿࢪ࣓ࣥࢺᕤᏛᑓᨷ ࠙ゼၥ᪥ࠚ ᖹᡂ 24(2012)ᖺ 3 ᭶ 15 ᪥ ࠙㠃ㄯ⪅ࠚ 㙊⏣ ඖᘯ Ặ ᕤᏛ㒊ᘓ⠏㒔ᕷ⎔ቃᏛ⛉ᩍᤵ ➉⏣ ᗣᏹ Ặ ⌮࣭⥲ົ㒊㛗 ༓௦⏣ ኵ Ặ ⥲ົ㒊⥲ົㄢ㛗 ࠙ゼၥ⪅ࠚ 㝣 㚝᪳ ホ౯ᴗ㒊ḟ㛗 Ọ Ⰻᨻ ホ౯ᴗ㒊ホ౯◊✲ㄢㄢ㛗 89 ᖇிᏛ ࠙ᖹᡂ ᖺᗘཷᑂࠚ ࢟ࣕࣥࣃࢫࡈࡢ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯άື Ꮫࡣ 7 ࡢ࢟ࣕࣥࣃࢫࢆ᧦ࡋ࡚࠾ࡾࠊ9 Ꮫ㒊 10 ◊✲⛉ࢆタ⨨ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋࡑࡢࡓࡵࠊ⮬ᕫ Ⅼ᳨࣭ホ౯άືࡣ࢟ࣕࣥࣃࢫࡈ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭⮬ᕫホ౯ጤဨࢆタ⨨ࡋ࡚⾜ࡗ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ ྛ࢟ࣕࣥࣃࢫ࠾ࡅࡿ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭⮬ᕫホ౯ጤဨࡢᵓᡂࡣ⾲ 1 ࡢ࠾ࡾ࡛࠶ࡿࠋྛ࢟ࣕ ࣥࣃࢫタ⨨ࡉࢀࡿᏛ㒊ᵓᡂࢆ⪃៖ࡋࠊࡑࢀࡒࢀࡢ࢟ࣕࣥࣃࢫ࡛ᐃࡵࡽࢀࡓつᐃᇶ࡙࠸ ࡚㐠Ⴀࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ ࡲࡓࠊ࢟ࣕࣥࣃࢫࡈࡢ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭⮬ᕫホ౯ጤဨࡣูࠊᏛయ㛵ࢃࡿ⮬ᕫⅬ ᳨࣭⮬ᕫホ౯ጤဨࢆタ⨨ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋᏛ㛗ࢆጤဨ㛗ࡋࡓྛ࢟ࣕࣥࣃࢫࡢ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭⮬ᕫ ホ౯ጤဨ㛗࡛ᵓᡂࡉࢀࠊᚋࡢ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯άືࡢ᪉㔪ࠊㄆドホ౯ࡢཷᑂࠊ⚾Ꮫࢆྲྀᕳ ࡃໃ࡞ࡘ࠸࡚༠㆟ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ 㹙⾲ 㹛࢟ࣕࣥࣃࢫࡈࡢ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭⮬ᕫホ౯ጤဨᵓᡂ ͤ ᯈᶫ࢟ࣕࣥࣃࢫ ࠙ጤဨᵓᡂࠚ ་Ꮫ㒊㛗ࠊ་⒪ᢏ⾡Ꮫ㒊㛗ࠊ་Ꮫ㒊ᩍົ㒊㛗ࠊ་Ꮫ㒊Ꮫ⏕㒊㛗ࠊ་Ꮫ㒊ᅗ᭩㤋㛗ࠊ་⒪ᢏ⾡Ꮫ㒊ྛᏛ⛉㛗ࠊ ົ㛗ࠊົ㒊ㄢ㛗 ࠙タ⨨Ꮫ㒊ࠚ་Ꮫ㒊㸦2㹼6 ᖺḟ㸧 ࠊ་⒪ᢏ⾡Ꮫ㒊㸦2㹼4 ᖺḟ㸧ͤ2ࠊ⸆Ꮫ㒊㸦5㹼6 ᖺḟ㸧 ࠊ་Ꮫ◊✲⛉ࠊ་ ⒪ᢏ⾡Ꮫ◊✲⛉ࠊබ⾗⾨⏕Ꮫ◊✲⛉ࠊ㝃ᒓ㝔 ┦ᶍ†࢟ࣕࣥࣃࢫ ࠙ጤဨᵓᡂࠚ ᩍᤵ 1 ྡࠊᩍဨ 10 ྡࠊົᒁࡼࡾⱝᖸྡ ࠙タ⨨Ꮫ㒊ࠚ⸆Ꮫ㒊㸦1㹼4 ᖺḟ㸧 ࠊ⸆Ꮫ◊✲⛉ ඵ⋤Ꮚ࢟ࣕࣥࣃࢫ ࠙ጤဨᵓᡂࠚ ྛᏛ⛉ࡼࡾᩍဨ 2 ྡࠊົ㛗ࠊົ㒊ࢢ࣮ࣝࣉ࣮ࣜࢲ࣮ ࠙タ⨨Ꮫ㒊ࠚ⤒῭Ꮫ㒊㸦1㹼4 ᖺḟ㸧ͤ3ࠊἲᏛ㒊㸦1㹼4 ᖺḟ㸧ࠊᩥᏛ㒊㸦1㹼4 ᖺḟ㸧 ࠊእᅜㄒᏛ㒊㸦1㹼4 ᖺ ḟ㸧 ࠊ་Ꮫ㒊㸦1 ᖺḟ㸧 ࠊ་⒪ᢏ⾡Ꮫ㒊㸦1 ᖺḟ㸧ͤ2ࠊ⤒῭Ꮫ◊✲⛉ࠊἲᏛ◊✲⛉ࠊᩥᏛ◊✲⛉ࠊእᅜㄒ◊ ✲⛉ࠊᩍ⫋◊✲⛉ Ᏹ㒔ᐑ࢟ࣕࣥࣃࢫ ࠙ጤဨᵓᡂࠚ ⌮ᕤᏛ㒊㛗ࠊᅗ᭩㤋㛗ࠊྛᏛ⛉㛗ࠊ⥲ྜᇶ♏⛉┠௵ࠊྛጤဨ㛗ࠊົ㛗 ࠙タ⨨Ꮫ㒊ࠚ⌮ᕤᏛ㒊㸦1㹼4 ᖺḟ㸧 ࠊ་⒪ᢏ⾡Ꮫ㒊ᰂ㐨ᩚᏛ⛉㸦1㹼4 ᖺḟ㸧ࠊ⤒῭Ꮫ㒊ᆅᇦ⤒῭Ꮫ⛉㸦1 㹼4 ᖺḟ㸧ࠊ⌮ᕤᏛ◊✲⛉ ⚟ᒸ࢟ࣕࣥࣃࢫ ࠙ጤဨᵓᡂࠚ 90 ⚟ᒸ་⒪ᢏ⾡Ꮫ㒊㛗ࠊົ㛗ࠊᏛ㒊㛗ࡀᣦྡࡋࡓ⪅ ࠙タ⨨Ꮫ㒊ࠚ⚟ᒸ་⒪ᢏ⾡Ꮫ㒊㸦1㹼4 ᖺḟ㸧 ࠙ഛ⪃ࠚ ͤ1 ᮏ⾲ࡣᏛ㒊ࠊᏛ⛉ࡢ࠶ࡿ࢟ࣕࣥࣃࢫ㝈ࡗ࡚グ㍕ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ ͤ2 ࢫ࣏࣮ࢶ་⒪Ꮫ⛉ᩆᛴᩆኈࢥ࣮ࢫ㸦1㹼4 ᖺḟ㸧ࡣࠊᯈᶫ࢟ࣕࣥࣃࢫࠋࢫ࣏࣮ࢶ་⒪Ꮫ⛉ᗣࢫ࣏࣮ࢶ ࢥ࣮ࢫ࣭ࢺࢵࣉࢫ࣮ࣜࢺࢥ࣮ࢫ㸦1㹼4 ᖺḟ㸧ࡣࠊඵ⋤Ꮚ࢟ࣕࣥࣃࢫࠋᰂ㐨ᩚᏛ⛉ࡣᏱ㒔ᐑ࢟ࣕࣥࣃࢫࠋ ͤ3 ᆅᇦ⤒῭Ꮫ⛉ࢆ㝖ࡃࠋ Ꮫయࡋ࡚ࠊ4 ᖺ 1 ᗘࠕ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭⮬ᕫホ౯ሗ࿌᭩ࠖࢆసᡂࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋࡑࡢ㐣⛬ ࡛ྛ㒊⨫ࠊྛ㒊㛛ࠊྛ㡯┠ࢆⅬ᳨ࡋࠊ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯άືࢆᐇࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋᖹᡂ 17(2005) ᖺᗘࡣᏛᇶ‽༠ࡢᇶ‽ࢆཧ⪃Ꮫㄢࡀ୰ᚰ࡞ࡗ࡚⾜ࡗࡓࠋᖹᡂ 20(2008)ᖺᗘࡣ ホ౯ᶵᵓࡢㄆドホ౯ࢆཷᑂࡋࠊ4 ᖺᚋࡢᖹᡂ 24(2012)ᖺᗘࡣホ౯ᶵᵓࡢ᪂ࡋ࠸ᇶ‽ᇶ࡙ ࠸࡚⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯άືࢆ㐍ࡵ࡚࠾ࡾࠊሗ࿌᭩ࢆసᡂࡍࡿணᐃ࡛࠶ࡿࠋ Ꮫࡣ་Ꮫ⣔ࡢᏛ㒊ࢆᣢࡘ⥲ྜᏛ࡛࠶ࡾࠊࡲࡓࠊホ౯ᶵᵓࡢᏛホ౯ᇶ‽ࡀ 11 ᇶ‽ ᩘࡀከࡃࠊㄆドホ౯ࢆཷᑂࡍࡿ㝿ࠊ⮬ᕫホ౯ሗ࿌᭩ࢆ 100 ࣮࣌ࢪ௨ෆࡲࡵࡿࡢⱞ ປࡋࡓࠋᖹᡂ 24(2012)ᖺᗘసᡂࡍࡿࠕ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭⮬ᕫホ౯ሗ࿌᭩ࠖࡣホ౯ᶵᵓࡢ᪂ࡋ࠸ ᇶ‽ࡢᇶ‽ᩘࡀᑡ࡞ࡃ࡞ࡗࡓࡇࡶ࠶ࡾࠊࡲࡵࡸࡍ࠸࠸࠺ពぢࡀ࠶ࡗࡓࠋ⮬ᕫホ౯ሗ ࿌᭩ࢆ 100 ࣮࣌ࢪࡲࡵࡿࡇࡣኚ࡞ⱞປࡔࡀࠊᏛࡢᴫせࡀࢥࣥࣃࢡࢺグ㏙ࡉࢀ ࡿࡢ࡛ࠊ᪂ධ⫋ဨࡢ◊ಟࡶά⏝ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ ㄆドホ౯ホ౯ᶵᵓࡀᣦࡋࡓ㡯ࡢᑐᛂ ᖹᡂ 20(2008)ᖺᗘホ౯ᶵᵓ࡛ㄆドホ౯ࢆ ཷᑂࡋࡓࠋᣦࡉࢀࡓ㡯ࡘ࠸࡚ࡣࠊᏛ యࡋ࡚ḟᖺᗘࡽᨵၿྲྀ⤌ࢇ࡛࠸ࡿࠋホ౯ ᶵᵓࡀసᡂࡋࡓㄪᰝሗ࿌᭩ࡢࠕཧ⪃ពぢࠖࡘ ࠸࡚ࡣࠊᏛయࡢ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭⮬ᕫホ౯ጤဨ ࡛ྲྀୖࡆࠊྛ࢟ࣕࣥࣃࢫࡢ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭⮬ᕫホ౯ ጤဨ㛗ᚋࡢㄢ㢟ࡋ࡚࿘▱ᚭᗏࢆ⾜࠸ࠊᨵ ၿࢆᅗࡿࡼ࠺ᣦ♧ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ ㄆドホ౯ཷᑂᚋࠊᣦࡉࢀࡓෆᐜࡣᩍᤵ࡛ ㄝ᫂ࢆ⾜ࡗࡓࠋࡲࡓࠊㄆドホ౯⤖ᯝ㛵ࡍࡿ࣮࣒࣮࣍࣌ࢪࡢ㜀ぴᐇ⦼ࡀከᩘ࠶ࡿࡇࡀ☜ ㄆ࡛ࡁ࡚࠾ࡾࠊ㛵ᚰࢆᣢࡓࢀ࡚࠸ࡿᐇឤࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯άືࢆᨭ࠼ࡿົయไ ᖹᡂ 23(2011)ᖺ 12 ᭶ࠊ㟘ࣨ㛵࢟ࣕࣥࣃࢫࠕ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯᥎㐍ᐊࠖࢆタࡅࡓࠋࡑࡇ ࡛ࡣࠊᏛయࡢ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯ጤဨάືࡢᗢົࢆᢸᙜࡋࠊᏛⓗᑐᛂࡍࡁㄢ㢟 ࡘ࠸࡚ㄪᩚࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ Ꮫࡋ࡚ᨵၿࡋ࡞ࡅࢀࡤ࡞ࡽ࡞࠸ࡇࡘ࠸࡚ࡣࠊᏛయࡢ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭⮬ᕫホ౯ጤ 91 ဨ᳨࡛ウࡋ࡚࠾ࡾࠊ ࠕ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯᥎㐍ᐊࠖ࠾࠸࡚㆟㢟ࡢసᡂཬࡧሗࡢᥦ౪࡞ࢆ ⾜ࡗ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ ࠕ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯᥎㐍ᐊࠖࡣᚋࠊጤဨࡢᗢົࢆᢸᙜࡍࡿࡢࡳࡲࡽࡎࠊᚲせ ᛂࡌ࡚ྛ࢟ࣕࣥࣃࢫᥦゝࡍࡿ࡞ࠊᏛ㐠Ⴀࡁࡃᙳ㡪ࢆ࠼ࡿ㒊⨫ࡋ࡚ຊࢆධࢀ ࡚࠸ࡃணᐃ࡛࠶ࡿࠋ یᖇிᏛࡢᴫἣ㸦ᖹᡂ ᖺᖺ ᭶ ᪥⌧ᅾ㸧 ࠙㛤タᖺᗘࠚ 41(1966)ᖺᗘ ࠙ᡤᅾᆅࠚ ᮾி㒔ᯈᶫ༊ຍ㈡ 2-11-1㸦ᯈᶫ࢟ࣕࣥࣃࢫ㸧 ⚄ዉᕝ┴┦ᶍཎᕷ┦ᶍ†⏫ᑍἑᔒ 1091-1㸦┦ᶍ†࢟ࣕࣥࣃࢫ㸧 ᮾி㒔ඵ⋤Ꮚᕷሯ 359㸦ඵ⋤Ꮚ࢟ࣕࣥࣃࢫ㸧 ᰣᮌ┴Ᏹ㒔ᐑᕷ㇏㒓ྎ 1-1㸦Ᏹ㒔ᐑ࢟ࣕࣥࣃࢫ㸧 ⚟ᒸ┴∹⏣ᕷ᪂❧⏫ 4-3-124㸦⚟ᒸ࢟ࣕࣥࣃࢫ㸧 ⚄ዉᕝ┴ᕝᓮᕷ㧗ὠ༊⁁ཱྀ 3-8-3㸦⁁ཱྀ࢟ࣕࣥࣃࢫ㸧 ༓ⴥ┴ᕷཎᕷጜᓮ 3426-3㸦ᕷཎ࢟ࣕࣥࣃࢫ㸧 ࠙Ꮫ㒊࣭◊✲⛉ࠚ Ꮫ㒊࣭◊✲⛉ Ꮫ⛉࣭◊✲⛉ᑓᨷ ་Ꮫ㒊 ་Ꮫ⛉ ⸆Ꮫ㒊 ⸆Ꮫ⛉ ⤒῭Ꮫ㒊 ⤒῭Ꮫ⛉ ⤒ႠᏛ⛉ ほග⤒ႠᏛ⛉ ᆅᇦ⤒῭Ꮫ⛉ ἲᏛ㒊 ἲᚊᏛ⛉ ᩥᏛ㒊 ᪥ᮏᩥᏛ⛉ ᩍ⫱Ꮫ⛉ ྐᏛ⛉ ♫Ꮫ⛉ ᚰ⌮Ꮫ⛉ እᅜㄒᏛ㒊 እᅜㄒᏛ⛉ ⌮ᕤᏛ㒊 ་⒪ᢏ⾡Ꮫ㒊 ⚟ᒸ་⒪ᢏ⾡Ꮫ㒊 ᶵᲔ࣭⢭ᐦࢩࢫࢸ࣒ᕤᏛ⛉ ⯟✵ᏱᐂᕤᏛ⛉ ࣂ࢜ࢧ࢚ࣥࢫᏛ⛉ ࣄ࣮࣐ࣗࣥሗࢩࢫࢸ࣒Ꮫ⛉ ሗ⛉Ꮫ⛉㏻ಙᩍ⫱ㄢ⛬ ど⬟▹ṇᏛ⛉ ┳ㆤᏛ⛉ デ⒪ᨺᑕ⥺Ꮫ⛉ ⮫ᗋ᳨ᰝᏛ⛉ ࢫ࣏࣮ࢶ་⒪Ꮫ⛉ ᰂ㐨ᩚᏛ⛉ ⌮Ꮫ⒪ἲᏛ⛉ సᴗ⒪ἲᏛ⛉ 92 ་Ꮫ◊✲⛉ ➨୍ᇶ♏་Ꮫᑓᨷ ➨ᇶ♏་Ꮫᑓᨷ ♫་Ꮫᑓᨷ ➨୍⮫ᗋ་Ꮫᑓᨷ ➨⮫ᗋ་Ꮫᑓᨷ ⸆Ꮫ◊✲⛉ ⸆Ꮫᑓᨷ ⤒῭Ꮫ◊✲⛉ ⤒῭Ꮫᑓᨷ ⤒ႠᏛᑓᨷ ἲᏛ◊✲⛉ ἲᚊᏛᑓᨷ ᩥᏛ◊✲⛉ ᪥ᮏᩥᑓᨷ ᚰ⌮Ꮫᑓᨷ ⮫ᗋᚰ⌮Ꮫᑓᨷ እᅜㄒ◊✲⛉ ㉸ᇦᩥᑓᨷ ⌮ᕤᏛ◊✲⛉ ⥲ྜᕤᏛᑓᨷ ሗ⛉Ꮫᑓᨷ㏻ಙᩍ⫱ㄢ⛬ ་⒪ᢏ⾡Ꮫ◊✲⛉ ど⬟▹ṇᏛᑓᨷ ┳ㆤᏛᑓᨷ デ⒪ᨺᑕ⥺Ꮫᑓᨷ ⮫ᗋ᳨ᰝᏛᑓᨷ ᩍ⫋◊✲⛉ ᩍ⫋ᐇ㊶ᑓᨷ㸦ᑓ㛛⫋㸧 බ⾗⾨⏕Ꮫ◊✲⛉ බ⾗⾨⏕Ꮫᑓᨷ㸦ᑓ㛛⫋㸧 ࠙ゼၥ᪥ࠚ ᖹᡂ 24(2012)ᖺ 3 ᭶ 26 ᪥ ࠙㠃ㄯ⪅ࠚ ෨Ọ ెྐ Ặ ᏛᰯἲேᖇிᏛ⌮㛗࣭ᖇிᏛᏛ㛗 ⯪ᆏ ๎ኵ Ặ ᏛᰯἲேᖇிᏛᮏ㒊ົ㛗 ᆏཱྀ ⿱ Ặ ᖇிᏛ㟘ࣨ㛵࢟ࣕࣥࣃࢫົ㛗 ᒣ ๛ Ặ ᖇிᏛ㟘ࣨ㛵࢟ࣕࣥࣃࢫ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯᥎㐍ᐊಀ㛗 ▼ ᬛஅ Ặ ᖇிᏛ㟘ࣨ㛵࢟ࣕࣥࣃࢫ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯᥎㐍ᐊಀ㛗 ࠙ゼၥ⪅ࠚ 㝣 㚝᪳ ホ౯ᴗ㒊ḟ㛗 ྜྷ㔝 ⏤⣖ ホ౯ᴗ㒊ホ౯ᴗㄢ௵ 93 㯇⃝Ꮫ ࠙ᖹᡂ ᖺᗘཷᑂࠚ 㻌 㸬᪥ᖖⓗ࡞⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯యไ Ꮫࡢ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯ࡣࠕ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨ጤဨࠖࢆ୰ᚰᐇࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋጤဨࡢ࣓ࣥࣂ࣮ ࡣ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨ጤဨつ⛬๎ࡾࠊጤဨ㛗ࢆᏛ㛗ࠊጤဨ㛗ࢆᏛ㛗ࡋࠊྛᏛ㒊ࠊ◊✲⛉ࠊ ู⛉ࡢ㈐௵⪅ࠊົᒁ㛗ࠊᏛົ㒊㛗ࠊ⏬㒊㛗ཬࡧ⥲ົ㒊㛗ࡢྜィ 15 ே࡛ᵓᡂࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ Ꮫࡢయⓗ࡞⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯ࡘ࠸࡚ࡣࠊᖹᡂ 8(1996)ᖺᗘ㛤ጞࡋࠊࡑࢀ௨㝆ẖᖺ ᐇࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋࡲࡓࠊᖹᡂ 15(2003)ᖺᗘࡽ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯άືࡢ୍⎔࡛࠶ࡿࠕ㯇⃝Ꮫ ᖺሗࠖࢆᏛ࣮࣒࣮࣍࣌ࢪẖᖺᥖ㍕ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ 㸬ࠕ㯇⃝Ꮫᖺሗࠖࢆ㍈ࡋࡓホ౯ࣉࣟࢭࢫ Ꮫ࠾ࡅࡿ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯ࡣࠕ㯇⃝Ꮫᖺሗࠖࢆసᡂࡍࡿࡇࡽጞࡲࡿࠋᖺሗࡣࠊ Ꮫࡀᥖࡆࡿ⌮ᛕ࣭┠ⓗࠊࡑࢀᇶ࡙ࡃᏛ㒊ࠊ◊✲⛉࡞ࡢ┠ⓗᑐࡍࡿᙜヱᖺᗘࡢάື ≧ἣࡘ࠸࡚ࠊ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨ጤဨᡤ⟶㒊⨫ࡀࡲࡵࡓࡶࡢ࡛࠶ࡿࠋࡇࢀࡣࠊἲே㛵ࡍࡿ ෆᐜࡸᩍဨ⤌⧊ࠊᰯ⯋ࠊ⎔ቃタഛࠊせ࡞㆟ࡢ᪥⛬ࡸ༠㆟㡯ࡶྜࢃࡏ࡚グ㍕ࡋ࡚࠾ࡾࠊ ㄆドホ౯ࡢཷᑂࡶά⏝ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ ࠙ཧ⪃ࠚ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯ࡢࣉࣟࢭࢫ ձ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨ጤဨᡤ⟶㒊⨫ࡼࡿࠕ㯇⃝Ꮫᖺሗࠖࡢసᡂ ղࠕᖺሗࠖࢆࡶ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨ጤဨࡀ㛗ᡤཬࡧㄢ㢟ࢆศᯒࡋࠊ ᑗ᮶ィ⏬㸦ᨵၿィ⏬㸧ࢆ᳨ウ ճᑗ᮶ィ⏬㸦ᨵၿィ⏬㸧ࢆ㋃ࡲ࠼ࡓᴗィ⏬᭩ࢆసᡂࡋࠊ⌮ᥦฟ մᴗィ⏬ᇶ࡙࠸ࡓ㐠Ⴀࢆ⾜࠸ࠊࡑࡢ⤖ᯝࢆ㋃ࡲ࠼࡚ᴗሗ࿌᭩ࢆసᡂࡋࠊ⌮ᥦฟ ࠕ㯇⃝Ꮫᖺሗࠖࡢ㡯┠ࡢタᐃ࠶ࡓࡗ࡚ࡣࠊᙜึࡣู㡯┠࡛࠶ࡗࡓࡀࠊホ౯ᶵᵓࡢㄆ ドホ౯ࡢཷᑂࢆỴᐃࡋࡓᚋࡣࠊホ౯ᶵᵓࡢᏛホ౯ᇶ‽ేࡏ࡚㡯┠ࡢಟṇࢆ⾜ࡗࡓࠋࡇ ࢀຍ࠼࡚ࠊᖺᗘࡈࡢࢺࣆࢵࢡࢫⓗ࡞ෆᐜࢆ㡯┠ຍ࠼࡚࠸ࡿࠋࡑࡢࡋ࡚ࠊᖹᡂ 23(2011)ᖺᗘࡢ ISO26000㸦♫ⓗ㈐௵つ᱁㸧ࡢά⏝ᐉゝᇶ࡙࠸ࡓྲྀ⤌ࡳ࡞ࡀ࠶ࡆࡽ ࢀࡿࠋ ࡇࢀࡣࠊ ᖹᡂ 22(2010)ᖺⓎ⾜ࡉࢀࡓ♫ⓗ㈐௵㛵ࡍࡿᅜ㝿つ᱁࡛࠶ࡿ ISO26000 ࡢά⏝ࢆ㋃ࡲ࠼Ꮫࡢ⌧≧ㄢ㢟ࢆᩚ⌮ࡋࠊᚲせᛶࡸᙳ㡪࡞ࢆ⪃៖ࡋ࡚タᐃࡉࢀࡓ 5 ࡘ ࡢࠕ㯇⃝ㄢ㢟ࠖᑐࡍࡿᏛࡢ㔜Ⅼⓗ࡞ྲྀ⤌ࡳ࡛࠶ࡿࠋࡇࢀࡣࠊ➨ 2 ࢧࢡࣝ࠾ࡅࡿホ ౯ᶵᵓࡢ࣭┠ⓗᇶ࡙ࡃᏛ⊂⮬ࡢࠕᇶ‽ࠖࡋ࡚タᐃࡍࡿࡇࢆ᳨ウࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ 94 ࠙ཧ⪃ࠚ,62 ᇶ࡙ࡃ ࡘࡢࠕ㯇⃝ㄢ㢟ࠖ ձᏛ⏕ᇶⅬ❧ࡗࡓᩍ⫱ࢆ᥎㐍ࡋᏛ⏕ࡢᡂ㛗ࢆຓࡅࡿࡇ ղᏛ⏕ᇶⅬ❧ࡗࡓ❆ཱྀᩍົ࣭ᑐᛂᚭࡍࡿࡇ ճ ᐊຠᯝ࢞ࢫࡢ๐ῶࢆᅗࡿࡇ մ⎔ቃ⨾࣭ಖດࡵࡿࡇ յࢥ࣑ࣗࢽࢸ㈉⊩ࢆᣢ⥆ⓗᐇ⌧ࡍࡿࡇ 㸬ㄆドホ౯⤖ᯝࡢά⏝ ㄆドホ౯ࡢ⤖ᯝࡢ࿘▱ࡘ࠸࡚ࡣࠊཷᑂࡢ㝿ࡢ⣔ิⓗ࡞ὶࢀࢆᢕᥱ࡛ࡁࡿࡼ࠺ࡍࡿ ࡓࡵࠊᙜࡢࠕ⮬ᕫホ౯ሗ࿌᭩࣭ᮏ⦅ࠖ ࠕホ౯ሗ࿌᭩ࠖཬࡧࠕㄆᐃドࠖࢆ 1 ࡘࡢᏊ ྲྀࡾࡲࡵࠊ⌮ࡸᩍᤵࡢ㈨ᩱࡋ࡚㓄ࡋࠊሗ࿌࣭ㄝ᫂ࢆ⾜ࡗࡓࠋ⫋ဨᑐࡋ࡚ࡣ ㄢ㛗⫋௨ୖࡢ⪅ࠊㄢഛ࠼ࡅࡋ࡚㓄ࡋࡓࠋ ホ౯ᶵᵓࡽཧ⪃ពぢࡋ࡚ᣦࡉࢀࡓ㡯⮬ᕫホ౯ሗ࿌᭩ࡢࠕᨵၿ࣭ྥୖ᪉⟇㸦ᑗ ᮶ィ⏬㸧 ࠖࡢᐇ⌧ࢆᅗࡗ࡚࠸ࡃࡓࡵࠕㄆドホ౯ࠗ⮬ᕫホ౯ሗ࿌᭩࠘ྲྀࡾ⤌ࡳ≧ἣ㸦ᑗ᮶ィ ⏬➼㸧ࡘ࠸࡚ࠖ࠸࠺୍ぴ⾲㸦⾲ 1 ཧ↷㸧ࢆసᡂࡋ࡚ࠊྛ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨ጤဨ㓄ࡋࠊㄢ㢟 ᑐࡍࡿྲྀ⤌ࡳ≧ἣࡢᢕᥱࡶ⾜ࡗ࡚࠸ࡿࠋࡲࡓࠊලయⓗ࡞ᨵၿィ⏬ࡘ࠸࡚ࡣᴗィ⏬᭩ ࠊᨵၿ⤖ᯝࡘ࠸࡚ࡣᴗሗ࿌᭩ࡑࢀࡒࢀヲ⣽グ㍕ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋࡑࡢᡂᯝࡋ࡚ࠊㄆ ドホ౯ࡢཷᑂࡢㄢ㢟࡛࠶ࡗࡓ FD(Faculty Development)ࡢ⤌⧊ⓗྲྀ⤌ࡳࡘ࠸࡚ࡣ ࠕࣇ࢝ࣝࢸ࣭ࢹ࣋ࣟࢵࣉ࣓ࣥࢺጤဨࠖࢆ⤌⧊ࡋ࡚㐠Ⴀࢆ㛤ጞࡋࡓࠋࡲࡓࠊᘓᏛࡢ ⢭⚄ࢆࡢࡼ࠺⛉┠ᫎࡉࡏࡿࡘ࠸࡚ࠊㄆドホ౯ཷᑂࡢᐇᆅㄪᰝ࠾ࡅࡿホ౯ ဨࡽࡢᣦࢆཧ⪃ࠊᖹᡂ 20(2008)ᖺ 4 ᭶ 1 ᪥ࠕ㐨ᚨ⛉Ꮫᩍ⫱ࢭࣥࢱ࣮ࠖࢆタ⨨ࡋࠊ 2 ࡢᩍ⛉᭩ࢆⓎ⾜ࡍࡿ࡞ࡢྲྀ⤌ࡳࢆ⾜ࡗࡓࠋ ࠙⾲ ࠚㄆドホ౯ࠗ⮬ᕫホ౯ሗ࿌᭩࠘ྲྀࡾ⤌ࡳ≧ἣ㸦ᑗ᮶ィ⏬➼㸧ࡘ࠸࡚ ሗ࿌᭩㻌 䝨䞊䝆㻌 ᑐᛂ㒊ᒁ㻌 䞉㒊⨫㻌 Ꮫ䛾┠ⓗ䛻䛴䛔䛶䚸௦䜢䝸䞊䝗䛩䜛䜒䛾 㻝㻌 䛻䛺䜛䜘䛖ᩍ⫋ဨ䛾㛫䛷䛾᳨ウ䜢㔜䛽䜛䛸ྠ 䛻䚸Ꮫ⏕䛻ᑐ䛩䜛࿘▱䛾ດຊ䜢⥅⥆䛩䜛䚹㻌 ⮬ 㼜㻚㻣㻌 Ꮫ㛗ᐊ㻌 ᘓᏛ䛾⢭⚄䞉Ꮫ䛾ᇶᮏ⌮ᛕཬ䜃䞉┠ⓗ䛜 㻞㻌 Ꮫ⏕䜔Ꮫእ⪅䛻䛹䛾䜘䛖䛻ཷ䛡Ṇ䜑䜙䜜䛶䛔䜛䛛 䛻䛴䛔䛶䛾䝕䞊䝍䛾㞟⣙䜢Ꮫ㛗ᐊ䛷㐍䜑䜛䚹㻌 ⮬ 㼜㻚㻤㻌 㻌㻌 㻌㻌 㻴㻌 㻝㻥㻌 㻴㻌 㻞㻜㻌 㻴㻌 㻞㻝㻌 㻴㻌 㻞㻞㻌 㻴㻌 㻞㻟㻌 㻴㻌 㻞㻠㻌 㻴㻌 㻞㻡㻌 㻴㻌 㻞㻢㻌 㻌 㻌 㻌 㻌 㻌 㻌 㻌 㻌 ῭㻌 ῭㻌 ῭㻌 ῭㻌 ῭㻌 ῭㻌 㻌 㻌 ᇶ‽ 㻝㻌 ᘓᏛ䛾⢭⚄䞉Ꮫ䛾ᇶᮏ⌮ᛕཬ䜃䞉┠ⓗ㻌 Ꮫ㛗ᐊ㻌 㻟㻌 㻠㻌 㻡㻌 㸬3'&$ ࢧࢡࣝࡀᶵ⬟ࡍࡿࡓࡵồࡵࡽࢀࡿព㆑ Ꮫࡣᨵၿ࣭ྥୖࡢࡓࡵࡢࡉࡲࡊࡲ࡞ດຊࢆ⾜ࡗ࡚࠸ࡿࡀࠊࡑࡢ୍᪉࡛ㄢ㢟ࡶᑡ࡞ࡽ ࡎᏑᅾࡍࡿࠋ࠼ࡤࠊ⾲ 1 ࢆ⏝࠸ࡓྲྀ⤌ࡳࡘ࠸࡚ࠊㄢ㢟ࡢෆᐜࡼࡗ࡚ࡣࠊᩥᏐ࡛グ㘓 95 ࡍࡿࡇࡀᅔ㞴࡛࠶ࡿࡇࡸ⾲ࡢᾐ㏱ᗘᕪࡀ࠶ࡿࡇ ࡞ࡀ࠶ࡆࡽࢀࡿࠋ ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯ࡣࠊᮏ᮶ⓗࡣᏛࡀࠕ⮬ࡽࠖᐇ ࡍࡿࡶࡢ࡛࠶ࡿࡀࠊࡑࢀ࡛ࡶἲ௧ࡼࡗ࡚⩏ົࡉࢀ ࡓࡇࡼࡾᙉไⓗ࡞ഃ㠃ࡀ࠶ࡿࡇࡣྰᐃ࡛ࡁ࡞࠸ࠋ ࡲࡓࠊᩍ⫋ဨ᪂ࡓ࡞ົ㈇ᢸࢆࡅࢀࡤከᑡ࡞ࡾ ࡶᢠࡀ࠶ࡿࡇࡣࠊ࠶ࡿព࠾࠸࡚ࡣᙜ↛ࡢࡇ ࡛࠶ࡾࠊࡑࢀࡣࡢᏛ࡛ࡶྠࡌ࡛࠶ࢁ࠺ࠋࡑࡢࡼ࠺ ࡞ഃ㠃ࡢ࠶ࡿ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯࡛࠶ࡗ࡚ࡶࠊᏛࡀ⮬ᕫ ᨵၿ⏕ࡍࠊᙉไⓗࠕࡸࡽࡉࢀ࡚࠸ࡿࠖࡢ࡛ࡣ࡞ࡃࠊᏛࡀⰋࡃ࡞ࡿࡓࡵ✚ᴟⓗ ࡘ⮬ⓗྲྀ⤌ࢇ࡛࠸ࡿ࠸࠺ព㆑ࡢඹ᭷ࡀ࡛ࡁࡿ࠺ࠊࡑࢀࡀᏛࡢࠊ᭦࠸࠼ ࡤ᪥ᮏ࠾ࡅࡿ㧗➼ᩍ⫱ࡢ㉁ಖドࡀᶵ⬟ࡍࡿྰࡢ㘽࡞ࡿࠋ せࡣᤊ࠼᪉ࡢၥ㢟࡛࠶ࡿࠋ 㯇⃝Ꮫࡣࡑࡢࡼ࠺࡞㧗࠸ព㆑ࡢࡶ࡛ࠊᏛࡗ࡚᭦ඃࢀࡓ PDCA ࢧࢡࣝࡢᅇࡋ ᪉ࢆᶍ⣴ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ ی㯇⃝Ꮫࡢᴫἣ㸦ᖹᡂ ᖺᖺ ᭶ ᪥⌧ᅾ㸧 ࠙㛤タᖺᗘࠚ 34(1959)ᖺᗘ ࠙ᡤᅾᆅࠚ ༓ⴥ┴᯽ᕷගࣨୣ 2-1-1 ࠙Ꮫ㒊࣭◊✲⛉ࠚ Ꮫ㒊࣭◊✲⛉ Ꮫ⛉࣭◊✲⛉ᑓᨷ እᅜㄒᏛ㒊 እᅜㄒᏛ⛉ ⤒῭Ꮫ㒊 ⤒῭Ꮫ⛉ ⤒ႠᏛ⛉ ゝㄒᩍ⫱◊✲⛉ ᪥ᮏㄒᩍ⫱Ꮫᑓᨷ ẚ㍑ᩥ᫂ᩥᑓᨷ ⱥㄒᩍ⫱ᑓᨷ ᅜ㝿⤒῭◊✲⛉ ⤒῭࣭ᨻ⟇⟶⌮ᑓᨷ ⤒῭⟶⌮ᑓᨷ ᨻ⟇⟶⌮ᑓᨷ ࠙ゼၥ᪥ࠚ ᖹᡂ 24(2012)ᖺ 3 ᭶ 13 ᪥ ࠙㠃ㄯ⪅ࠚ ⏕᪉ Ặ ⏬㒊 ⥲ྜᨻ⟇ᐊ㛗 96 ࠙ゼၥ⪅ࠚ ఀ⸨ ᩄᘯ ホ౯ᴗ㒊㒊㛗 ኳὠ ᠇ ホ౯ᴗ㒊ホ౯◊✲ㄢಀ㛗 97 ⥲ᣓ ࣥࢣ࣮ࢺㄪᰝᅇ⟅ࡋࡓᏛࡢ࠺ࡕࠊ6 Ꮫࣥࢱࣅ࣮ࣗㄪᰝࢆᐇࡋࡓࡀࠊ࡚ ࡢᏛࡀㄆドホ౯ཷᑂᚋ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯ࢆᐇࡋ࡚࠸ࡓࠋࡲࡓࠊㄆドホ౯࡛ᣦࡉࢀࡓ 㡯ࡘ࠸࡚ࡣࠊᣦࡉࢀࡓ࡚ࡢᏛ࡛ᨵၿྲྀ⤌ࢇ࡛࠾ࡾࠊᣦࡀ࡞ࡗࡓᏛ࠾ ࠸࡚ࡶᏛࡢᣦෆᐜࢆ㋃ࡲ࠼࡚Ꮫෆࡢᨵၿࡢཧ⪃ࡋ࡚࠸ࡓࠋ ᅇࡢࣥࢱࣅ࣮ࣗㄪᰝࡣࡢඹ᭷ࢆ┠ⓗࡋ࡚ᐇࡋࡓࡀࠊᆅᇦࠊつᶍࠊタ⨨Ꮫၥ ⣔⤫ࡣࡉࡲࡊࡲ࡛࠶ࡾࠊྲྀ⤌ࡳෆᐜࡣࡑࢀࡒࢀࡢᏛࡢಶᛶࡸດຊࡀ⾲ࢀ࡚࠸ࡓࠋ ࡓࡔࡋࠊ࠸ࡃࡘඹ㏻ࡍࡿ㒊ศࡶ࠶ࡾࠊ௨ୗࡢⅬࡘ࠸࡚ࡣࠊᏛ࡛ࡶඹ᭷࡛ࡁࡿ 㡯࡛࡞࠸ࡔࢁ࠺ࠋ ࣭⊂⮬ࡢᵝᘧࢆ⏝ࡋࡓ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯ሗඹ᭷ ࣭ㄆドホ౯௨እࡢ➨୕⪅ホ౯ࢆཷࡅࡿࡇࡼࡿ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯ࡢᐇ ࣭ᑓ㛛㒊⨫ࡼࡿ⥅⥆ⓗ࡞⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯ࡢᐇ ࣭⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯ᇶ࡙ࡃᴗィ⏬ࡸண⟬ࡢసᡂ ㄆドホ౯ࡀࡁࡗࡅ࡞ࡾࠊつᐃࡸ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯యไࡢぢ┤ࡋྲྀ⤌ࢇࡔࢣ࣮ࢫࡶከ ࡃぢࡽࢀࡓࠋᅇࡢࣥࢱࣅ࣮ࣗㄪᰝࡢෆᐜࡀྛᏛ࠾ࡅࡿᚋࡢ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯ࢆᐇ ࡍࡿୖ࡛ࡢཧ⪃࡞ࢀࡤᖾ࠸࡛࠶ࡿࠋ ᭱ᚋࠊࡈ༠ຊ࠸ࡓࡔ࠸ࡓ 6 Ꮫࡢ㛵ಀ⪅ࡢⓙᵝឤㅰࡍࡿࡶࠊᚋࡢ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ ホ౯άືࡢ᭦࡞ࡿᐇᏛࡢཧ⪃࡞ࡿࡢ✚ᴟⓗ࡞බ㛤ᮇᚅࡋࡓ࠸ࠋ 98 ㄪᰝ◊✲ࢸ࣮࣐㸰 ⡿ᅜ༡㒊ᆅ༊ᇶ‽༠ཬࡧྠ༠ᡤᒓᏛࡢ ホ౯㛵ࡍࡿㄪᰝ◊✲ یㄪᰝ◊✲ࡢᴫせ 㸯㸬᪨ཬࡧෆᐜ Ꮫࡢᶵ㛵ูㄆドホ౯ࡣࠊᅜࡢᐃࡵࡿ 7 ᖺ୍ᗘࡢ᭱ึࡢࢧࢡࣝࡀ⤊ࢃࡾࠊ➨ 2 ࢧ ࢡࣝࢆ㏄࠼࡚࠸ࡲࡍࠋࡇࢀࢆᶵࠊࡇࢀࡲ࡛ࡢ⤒㦂ࢆ㋃ࡲ࠼࡚ࠊᏛࡢ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯ ཬࡧㄆドホ౯ࡢ࠶ࡾ᪉ࡸᙺࢆ᳨ウࡋࠊㄆドホ౯ࢩࢫࢸ࣒ࡢ㠃ⓗ࡞ぢ┤ࡋࢆ⾜࠸ࠊᖹ ᡂ 24(2012)ᖺᗘࡽ᪂ࡓ࡞ࢩࢫࢸ࣒ࡼࡾࠊㄆドホ౯ࢆᐇࡍࡿࡇ࠸ࡓࡋࡲࡋࡓࠋࡑ ࡢࡓࡵࠊ᪂ࢩࢫࢸ࣒ࡢࣔࢹࣝࡋࡓ⡿ᅜࡢ Southern Association of Colleges and Schools 㸦༡㒊ᆅ༊ᇶ‽༠㸧ཬࡧྠ༠ᡤᒓࡢ」ᩘࡢᏛࢆゼၥࡋࠊホ౯ࡢ᰿ᣐ࡞ࡿ࢚ࣅࢹࣥ ࢫࡢࡸุᐃ࡞㛵ࡍࡿ⪺ྲྀࡾㄪᰝࢆ⾜࠸ࠊㄪᰝ⤖ᯝࢆࡲࡵࡿࡶࠊ᪂ࢩࢫࢸ ࣒ࡢ᭦࡞ࡿ᳨ドࢆ⾜࠸ࠊホ౯ᇶ‽ࡢぢ┤ࡋࠊᐇ᪉ἲཬࡧุᐃ᪉ἲ࡞ᫎࡍࡿࠋ 㸰㸬ゼၥඛ ۑSouthern Association of Colleges and Schools(SACS) ۑEmory University ۑAgnes Schott College ۑGeorgia Institute of Technology 㸱㸬ゼၥ⪅ ⩚⏣✚⏨㸦᪥ᮏᏛᩥ⌮Ꮫ㒊ᩍᤵ㸧 㧗ᶫ ᏹ㸦ᮾிᅜ㝿ᏛᏛ㛗࣭ᩍᤵ㸧 ఀ⸨ᩄᘯ㸦ホ౯ᶵᵓホ౯ᴗ㒊㛗㸧 㝣 㚝᪳㸦ホ౯ᶵᵓホ౯ᴗ㒊ḟ㛗㸧 㸲㸬ࡑࡢ ᮏᩥ୰ࡢᏛᴫせグ㍕ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿᏛࡢ␎ㄒ ۑA㸻associate degree or equivalent㸻‽Ꮫኈ ۑB㸻baccalaureate (bachelor’s) degree or equivalent㸻Ꮫኈ ۑM㸻master’s degree or equivalent㸻ಟኈ ۑD㸻doctoral degree or equivalent㸻༤ኈ 103 Ϩ 6RXWKHUQ$VVRFLDWLRQRI&ROOHJHVDQG6FKRROV 㸦༡㒊ᆅ༊ᇶ‽༠㸧 6RXWKHUQ$VVRFLDWLRQRI&ROOHJHVDQG6FKRROV㸦༡㒊ᆅ༊ᇶ‽༠㸧 ࠙ゼၥ᪥ࠚᖹᡂ 23(2011)ᖺ 7 ᭶ 11 ᪥ ࠙ᶵ㛵ࡢᴫせࠚ ఫᡤ㸸1866 Southern Lane, Decatur, Georgia 30033㸭タ⨨ᙧែ㸸1895 ᖺタ❧ࠊᶵ㛵 ูࢡࣞࢹࢸ࣮ࢩࣙࣥᅋయ ࠙㠃ㄯ⪅ࠚ Claudette H. Williams Ặ࣭࣭࣭Vice President Commission on Colleges ࠙ゼၥㄪᰝဨࠚ ⩚⏣✚⏨㸦᪥ᮏᏛᩥ⌮Ꮫ㒊ᩍᤵ㸧 ࠊ㧗ᶫ ᏹ㸦ᮾிᅜ㝿ᏛᏛ㛗࣭ᩍᤵ㸧 ࠊ ఀ⸨ᩄᘯ㸦ホ౯ᶵᵓホ౯ᴗ㒊㛗㸧 ࠊ㝣 㚝᪳㸦ホ౯ᶵᵓホ౯ᴗ㒊ḟ㛗㸧 ࠙༡㒊ᆅ༊ᇶ‽༠ࡢホ౯ࡢᴫせࠚ ⡿ᅜࢪ࣮ࣙࢪᕞࡢࢺࣛࣥࢱᕷ㑹እ࠶ࡿ Southern Association of Colleges and Schools 㸦༡㒊ᆅ༊ᇶ‽༠ࠊ௨ୗ SACS ࠸࠺㸧ࡣࠊ༡ 㒊ᆅ༊ࡢ 11 ᕞ㸦ࣛࣂ࣐ࠊࣇࣟࣜࢲࠊࢪ࣮ࣙࢪ ࠊࢣࣥࢱࢵ࣮࢟ࠊࣝࢪࢼࠊ࣑ࢩࢩࢵࣆ࣮ࠊ ࣀ࣮ࢫ࢝ࣟࣛࢼࠊࢧ࢘ࢫ࢝ࣟࣛࢼࠊࢸࢿࢩ࣮ࠊ ࢸ࢟ࢧࢫࠊࣦ࣮ࢪࢽ㸧ཬࡧࣛࢸ࣓ࣥࣜ࢝ࡸ ᾏእࡢᏛࢆᑐ㇟ᶵ㛵ูࡢࢡࣞࢹࢸ࣮ࢩࣙ ࣥࢆ⾜ࡗ࡚࠸ࡿᅋయ࡛࠶ࡿࠋ 㸺┠ⓗ㸼 SACS ࡛ࡣࢡࣞࢹࢸ࣮ࢩࣙࣥࣉࣟࢭࢫࢆ㏻ࡌ࡚௨ୗࡢ 3 ࡘࡢⅬࡘ࠸࡚☜ㄆࡋ࡚࠸ ࡿࠋ 㸦㸯㸧Ꮫࡣࠊ㧗➼ᩍ⫱ᶵ㛵ࡋ࡚㐺ษ࡞࣑ࢵࢩࣙࣥࢆᥖࡆࠊࡑࢀࢆ㐩ᡂࡍࡿࡓࡵࡢ༑ ศ࡞ࣜࢯ࣮ࢫࠊࣉࣟࢢ࣒ࣛཬࡧࢧ࣮ࣅࢫࢆഛ࠼࡚࠸ࡿࡇ 㸦㸰㸧Ꮫࡣࠊᩍ⫱ࡢ㉁ࡢỈ‽ࢆ⥔ᣢࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࡇ 㸦㸱㸧Ꮫࡣࠊ㉁ࡢ⥔ᣢ࣭ྥୖࡢࡓࡵࡢィ⏬ࢆᣢࡗ࡚࠸ࡿࡇ 㸺㸲ࡘࡢ㹑㹣㹡㹲㹧㹭㹬㸦ホ౯ᇶ‽㸧㸼 SACS ࡢ Commission㸦ุᐃጤဨ㸧ࡣ௨ୗࡢෆᐜᇶ࡙࠸ุ࡚ᐃࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ Section 1㸸ㄔᐇᛶࡢཎ๎๎ࡗ࡚࠸ࡿ㸦ሗ࿌᭩ࡀṇ┤グ㏙ࡉࢀ࡚࠸ࡿ㸧 Section 2㸸ࢥ࡞ࡿᚲせせ௳ࢆ‶ࡓࡋ࡚࠸ࡿ Section 3㸸ᇶ‽ࢆ‶ࡓࡋ࡚࠸ࡿ㸦Section 2 ࡢලయⓗ࡞㡯㸧 Section 4㸸㐃㑥ᨻᗓࡀᐃࡵࡿᇶ‽ࢆ‶ࡓࡋ࡚࠸ࡿ 107 ࣭ࡑࡢࠊSACS ࡢ࣏ࣜࢩ࣮ἢࡗ࡚࠸ࡿ 㸺ࣞࣅ࣮ࣗࣉࣟࢭࢫ㸼 ࢡࣞࢹࢸ࣮ࢩࣙࣥࡢ✀㢮ࡣḟࡢ 3 ࡘศࡅࡽࢀࡿࠋ ࣭ೃ⿵⪅࡞ࡿࡓࡵࡢࢡࣞࢹࢸ࣮ࢩࣙࣥ㸫Candidate ጤဨᢸᙜ ࣭࣓ࣥࣂ࣮࡞ࡿࡓࡵࡢࢡࣞࢹࢸ࣮ࢩࣙࣥ㸫Accreditation ጤဨᢸᙜ ࣭᪤Ꮡ࣓ࣥࣂ࣮ࡢ⥅⥆ⓗࢡࣞࢹࢸ࣮ࢩࣙࣥ㸫Reaffirmation ጤဨᢸᙜ 㸺Ꮫࡽࡢ㸰ࡘࡢᥦฟ᭩㢮㸼 1㸬Compliance Certification Report㸦ࢥࣥࣉࣛࣥࢫሗ࿌᭩ࠊ௨ୗ CCR ࠸࠺㸧 CCR ࡣࠊᏛࡀసᡂࡍࡿሗ࿌᭩࡛࠶ࡿࠋᏛࡣࠊࢥ࡞ᚲせせ௳ࡸホ౯ᇶ‽ࠊ㐃㑥 ᨻᗓࡀồࡵࡿᇶ‽ࢆ‶ࡓࡋ࡚࠸ࡿ࠺࡞ࠊSection 1㹼4 ࡢ 82 ࡢᇶ‽㡯┠ࡈ Compliance㸦‶ࡓࡋ࡚࠸ࡿ㸧ࠊPartial-Compliance㸦୍㒊‶ࡓࡋ࡚࠸ࡿ㸧ࠊ Non-Compliance(‶ࡓࡋ࡚࠸࡞࠸)ࡢ 3 ẁ㝵࡛⮬ᕫุᐃࡋࠊ᭱⤊ุᐃࡢ⣙ 15 ᭶๓Ꮫ 㛗ཬࡧ࢚ࣜࢰࣥ࢜ࣇࢧ࣮㸦⮬ᕫホ౯ᢸᙜ⪅㸧ྡ࡛ᥦฟࡍࡿࠋCCR ࡣࠊᇶ‽㡯┠ࡈࡢ ุᐃࠊุᐃ⌮⏤ࠊ᰿ᣐ㈨ᩱ࡛ᵓᡂࡉࢀࠊ࣮࣌ࢪᩘࡢไ㝈ࡣタࡅࡽࢀ࡚࠸࡞࠸ࠋ 2㸬Quality Enhancement Plan㸦㉁ྥୖィ⏬᭩ࠊ௨ୗ QEP ࠸࠺㸧 QEP ࡣᏛࡀ On-Site Review ࡢ⣙ 6 㐌㛫๓ SACS ᥦฟࡍࡿᚋࡢ 5 ᖺィ⏬᭩ ࡛ࠊ㸦1㸧Ꮫࡢၥ㢟Ⅼ㸦2㸧Ꮫಟᡂᯝࡸࡢ㐩ᡂ≧ἣ㸦3㸧ᐇ⌧ྍ⬟࡞ᐇ⾜ィ⏬㸦4㸧 ྲྀ⤌యไ㸦5㸧┠ⓗࡢ᫂♧㐩ᡂࡢࡓࡵࡢᑗ᮶ィ⏬࡞࡛ᵓᡂࡉࢀࠊㄝ᫂ᩥ᭩ࡣ 75 ࣮࣌ ࢪ௨ෆࠊ⿵㊊ࡢ᭩㢮ࡸࢹ࣮ࢱ࡞ࡢ㈨ᩱࡣ 25 ࣮࣌ࢪ௨ෆ࡛ࡢసᡂࢆồࡵ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ 㸺㹑㸿㹁㹑ࡼࡿホ౯㸼 1㸬Off-Site Review 㸦᭩㠃ホ౯㸧 Off-Site Review Committee ࡣࠊ ᅋ㛗 1 ேࠊ ホ౯ဨ 8㹼10 ே࡛ᵓᡂࡉࢀࠊ1 ࡘࡢ Off-Site Review Committee ࡛⣙ 3 ࡘࡢᏛࡢ Off-Site Review ࢆ⾜ࡗ࡚࠸ࡿࠋᏛࡽᥦฟࡉ ࢀࡓ 4 ࡘࡢ Section ࡽ࡞ࡿ CCR㸦QEP 㛵ಀࡢᇶ‽㡯┠ 2.12 3.3.2 ࢆ㝖ࡃ㸧ࢆホ౯ ࡋࠊᇶ‽㡯┠ࡈ Compliance ཪࡣ Non-Compliance ࡢ࠸ࡎࢀุ࡛ᐃࡍࡿࠋᏛࡢ ⮬ᕫุᐃࡋࡓ Partial-Compliance ࡣࠊ୍㒊ࡣ‶ࡓࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࡀ᭱⤊ⓗࡣ࡚ࢆ‶ࡓࡋ ࡚࠸࡞࠸࠸࠺ุ᩿ࡋ࡚ Non-compliance ุᐃࡍࡿࠋNon-compliance ࡢᇶ‽㡯┠ ࡀ࠶ࡗࡓሙྜࡣࠊᨵၿ㡯ࢆྵࡵࡓホ౯ሗ࿌᭩ࢆసᡂࡋࠊᏛ㏦ࡍࡿࠋ 2㸬On-Site Review㸦ᐇᆅホ౯㸧 ཎ๎ 1 ࡘࡢ On-Site Review Committee ࡀ 1 ᏛࢆᢸᙜࡋࠊOff-Site Review Committee ࡣูࡢ࣓ࣥࣂ࣮࡛ᵓᡂࡉࢀࡿࠋOn-Site Review Committee ࡣࠊQEP ࡀ ᐇ⾜ྍ⬟࡞ෆᐜ࡛࠶ࡾࡑࡢࣜࢯ࣮ࢫࡸయไࡀᩚഛࡉࢀ࡚࠸ࡿ࠺ࢆ☜ㄆࡋࠊQEP ࡀ ཷ⌮࡛ࡁᚓࡿෆᐜ࡛࠶ࡿ࠺ࢆุ᩿ࡍࡿࠋ᭦ࠊOff-Site Review Committee ࡛ Non-Compliance ุᐃࡉࢀᨵၿࡀᣦࡉࢀࡓ㡯㸦Off-Site Review ࡛Ỵᐃࡉࢀࡓෆᐜ 108 ࡘ࠸࡚ࡣホ౯ࡢᑐ㇟ࡋ࡞࠸㸧ࡢᨵၿ≧ἣࢆ☜ㄆࡋࠊホ౯ሗ࿌᭩ࢆసᡂࡍࡿࠋホ౯ሗ ࿌᭩ࡣࠊᏛ㏦ࡍࡿࡶ Commission ᥦฟࡍࡿࠋ 3㸬Review by the Commission’s Board of Trustees㸦ุᐃጤဨࡼࡿホ౯㸧 ุᐃጤဨࡣࠊOn-Site Review Committee ࡽࡢሗ࿌᭩ࢆཷࡅࠊุᐃࢆ⾜࠺ࠋ୍㒊 ࡢෆᐜࡀᨵၿࡉࢀ࡚࠾ࡽࡎࠊNon-compliance ࡢᇶ‽㡯┠ࡀ࠶ࡿሙྜࡣࠊᏛࡢᨵၿ ࢆᗘಁࡋࠊᨵၿሗ࿌᭩ࡢᥦฟࢆồࡵࡿࠋࡑࡢᚋࠊᏛࡽࡢᨵၿሗ࿌᭩ࡢෆᐜࢆᗘ ᑂ㆟ࡋࠊ᭱⤊ⓗ࡞ホ౯⤖ᯝࢆ☜ᐃࡋࠊ⌮ᥦฟࡍࡿࠋ 㸺ุᐃ㸼 Accredited or not 㐺ྜㄆᐃ㸫࡚ࡢᇶ‽㡯┠ࡀ‶ࡓࡉࢀ࡚࠸ࡿሙྜ Sanction㸫1 ࡘ௨ୖࡢᇶ‽㡯┠ࡀ‶ࡓࡉࢀ࡚࠸࡞࠸ሙྜ 㸦ࣔࢽࢱࣜࣥࢢ࣏࣮ࣞࢺࡢᥦฟ㸧 㸯㸬Warning㸦㆙࿌㸧ᮇ㛫㸫2 ᖺ௨ෆ 㸰㸬Probation㸦ಖ␃㸧ᮇ㛫㸫2 ᖺ௨ෆ 㸱㸬Lose membership㸦࣓ࣥࣂ࣮ࢩࢵࣉࡢ႙ኻ㸧 㸺⤖ᯝࡢබ⾲㸼 Accredited ࡉࢀࡓᏛ㸸Ꮫྡࡢࡳබ⾲ Sanction ≧ែࡢᏛ㸸Ꮫྡཬࡧ⌮⏤ ࠙ゼၥㄪᰝࡢᴫせࠚ SACS ࡣࠊࢡࣞࢹࢸ࣮ࢩࣙࣥࡢᴗົࢆ⾜ࡗ࡚࠸ࡿᅋయ࡛࠶ࡾࠊ1 ேࡢ㛗 9 ேࡢ 㛗࡛ᵓᡂࡉࢀࠊࡑࢀࡒࢀࡀ⣙ 100 Ꮫࢆᢸᙜࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ⡿ࡣࠊ6 ࡘࡢᆅᇦู⾜ ࠺ᅋయᾏእࡢᏛࢆᑐ㇟ࡍࡿᅋయࡢィ 7 ࡘࡀᶵ㛵ูࢡࣞࢹࢸ࣮ࢩࣙࣥࢆ⾜ࡗ࡚࠸ ࡿࠋࡢ⡿ᅜࡢᆅ༊ࡣ␗࡞ࡾࢫࢱࢵࣇࡀ On-Site Review ࡶྠ⾜ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿⅬࡀࡁ ࡞≉ᚩ࡛࠶ࡿࠋ⌧ᅾ⣙ 9,000 ேࡢホ౯ဨࢆ☜ ಖࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ SACS ࡛ࡣ 10 ᖺࡈࡢࢡࣞࢹࢸ࣮ࢩ ࣙࣥ 5 ᖺࡈࡢ୰㛫ホ౯ࢆ⩏ົࡅ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ 10 ᖺࡈࡢࢡࣞࢹࢸ࣮ࢩࣙࣥࡣ 80 㡯┠ ࡘ࠸࡚ホ౯ࡍࡿࡀࠊ୰㛫ホ౯ࡣࠊࡑࡢ࠺ࡕ ࡢ 14 㡯┠ࡘ࠸࡚ホ౯ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ 㻌 㸺㸲ࡘࡢ㹑㹣㹡㹲㹧㹭㹬㸦ホ౯ᇶ‽㸧㸼 SACS ࡛ࡣホ౯ᇶ‽ࢆ Section ࢇ࡛࠸ࡿࡀࠊࡑࡢ୰࡛ࡶ Section 1 ࡢ Integrity㸦ㄔ ᐇᛶ㸧ࡀ᭱ࡶ㔜せ࡛࠶ࡿࠋSection ࡣ 4 ࡘ࠶ࡿࡀࠊSection1 ࠸࠺ࡢࡣ SACS ࡀ┤᥋㛵 ࡋ࡞࠸ Section ࡛࠶ࡿࠋࡋࡋࠊSACS ࡀ Section 2ࠊ3ࠊ4 ࢆ࢜ࣇࢧࢺ㸦᭩㠃㸧࢜ࣥ ࢧࢺ㸦ᐇᆅ㸧࡛ࡢホ౯ࢆ㏻ࡋ࡚ࠊᏛഃࡀ Section1 㐺ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࡇࢆࡲࡎホ౯ࡍࡿࠋ 109 Section 2 ࡛ࡣࠊホ౯ࡢࢥ࡞ࡿ 12 ࡢᇶ‽㡯┠ࢆタࡅ࡚࠸ࡿࠋࡇࡢ࠺ࡕ㸯ࡘ࡛ࡶᏛ ࡀせồ㡯┠㐺ྜࡋ࡞࠸ሙྜࡣࢡࣞࢹࢸ࣮ࢩࣙࣥࢆ࠼࡚࠸࡞࠸ࠋᏛࡀึࡵ࡚ SACS ࡢ࣓ࣥࣂ࣮࡞ࡿຍ┕ุᐃࡢሙྜࡣࠊ2.1 ࡽ 2.11 ࡲ࡛ࡢ 11 㡯┠࡚ࢆ‶ࡓࡉ࡞ ࡅࢀࡤ࡞ࡽ࡞࠸ࠋ2.12 ࡣࠊ᪤࣓ࣥࣂ࣮࡞ࡗ࡚࠸ࡿᏛࡀ‶ࡓࡍࡁせồ㡯┠࡛࠶ࡿࠋ ࡘࡲࡾࠊ࡚ࡢ࣓ࣥࣂ࣮ࡣ᭱ప㝈ࠊ11 ࡢ㡯┠ࢆ‶ࡓࡉ࡞ࡅࢀࡤ࡞ࡽ࡞࠸ࡇ࡞ࡿࠋࡇࢀ ࡽࡢ㡯┠ࡣࠊᏛࡢ࢞ࣂࢼࣥࢫࠊࢡࣞࢹࢸ࣮ࢩࣙࣥࣉࣟࢢ࣒ࣛࠊࣇ࢝ࣝࢸࠊ୍⯡ ᩍ㣴ㄢ⛬ࠊࣜࢯ࣮ࢫࠊᏛ⏕ࢧ࣮ࣅࢫࠊ࡞࡛࠶ࡿࠋࡇࡢ࠺ࡕࠊᐇ⾜ࢆྍ⬟ࡍࡿࡓࡵࡢࣜ ࢯ࣮ࢫࡀ᭱ࡶ㔜せ࡛࠶ࡿᤊ࠼ࡽࢀ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ Section 2 ࡀయⓗ࡞ホ౯ෆᐜࠊ㡯┠ࢆ⥙⨶ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࡢᑐࡋࠊSection 3 ࡣ Section 2 ࡢᇶ‽㡯┠ࢆලయࡋࡓヲ⣽࡞ෆᐜࢆ♧ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋࡇࡢ Section ࡢ୰ྵࡲࢀ࡚࠸ࡿ㡯┠ 㛵ࡋ࡚ࡣࠊ1 ࡘ࡛ࡶࡇࢀ㐺ྜࡀ࠶ࡗࡓሙྜࡣࠊࡑࡢᨵၿࡀồࡵࡽࢀࡿࠋࡇࡢᇶ‽ 㛵ࡋ࡚ࡣࠊ᪂ࡋࡃ࣓ࣥࣂ࣮ࡢຍ┕ࢆᕼᮃࡍࡿᏛࡣࠊ࡚ࡢ㡯┠㐺ྜࡍࡿࡇࡀồࡵ ࡽࢀࡿࠋ࠸ࡃࡘࡢⅬ㛵ࡋ࡚ࠊ㐺ྜࡋ࡚࠸࡞࠸㡯┠ࡀ࠶ࡗࡓሙྜࡣࠊᨵၿࡍࡿࡼ࠺ồ ࡵࡿࠋࡓࡔࡋࠊせ࡞㡯┠ࠊ࠼ࡤ 3.1 ࡀ㐺ྜ࡛࠶ࡿ࠸࠺ሙྜࠊࢡࣞࢹࢸ࣮ࢩࣙ ࣥࡣ࠼ࡽࢀ࡚࠸࡞࠸ࠋ Section 4 ࡣࠊ㐃㑥ᨻᗓࡢせồ㡯࡛࠶ࡿࡢ࡛ࠊ㐃㑥ᨻᗓࡀࣞࣅ࣮ࣗࡍࡿࠋ SECTION 1: The Principle of Integrity SECTION 2: Core Requirements SECTION 3: Comprehensive Standards 3.1 Institutional Mission 3.2 Governance and Administration 3.3 Institutional Effectiveness 3.4 All Educational Programs 3.5 Undergraduate Programs 3.6 Graduate and Post-Baccalaureate Professional Programs 3.7 Faculty 3.8 Library and Other Learning Resources 3.9 Student Affairs and Services 3.10 Financial Resources 3.11 Physical Resources 3.12 Substantive Change Procedures and Policy 3.13 Compliance with Other Commission Policies 3.14 Representation of Status SECTION 4: Federal Requirements ͤヲ⣽ࡣᚋᥖࡢ㈨ᩱࢆࡈཧ↷ࡃࡔࡉ࠸ࠋ 110 㸺㹑㸿㹁㹑ࡢ⤌⧊㸼 SACS ࡢ⤌⧊ࡋ࡚ࡣࠊ㛗㛗ࡑࢀࡒࢀࡀྛ✀Ꮫࢆᢸᙜࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ9 ேࡢ 㛗ࡑࡢୗࢹࣞࢡࢱ࣮ࢆ㓄⨨ࡋࠊࡉࡲࡊࡲ࡞᪥ᖖᴗົࡸ⌮ࡢ㐃⤡࡞ࡢᴗົࢆᢸ ᙜࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋࡑࡢ㈈ົ㛵ࡍࡿᑓ㛛ᐙࢆ㓄⨨ࡋࠊᢸᙜࡢ㛗ࡶࡉࡲࡊࡲ࡞ ㈈ົࡢᴗົࢆ⾜ࡗ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ᭦ࠊᏛࢧ࣏࣮ࢺ࠸࠺ࢢ࣮ࣝࣉࡶタࡅ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ⌧ᅾྜィ 37 ேࡢࢫࢱࢵࣇࢆ᭷ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ ⌮ࡣࠊ77 ே࡛ࠊྛᏛ࡛㑅ฟࡉࢀࡓ⪅ࡀࡇࡢ࣓ࣥࣂ࣮࡞ࡿࠋ᭦ࠊExecutive Council ࠸࠺⤌⧊ࡀ࠶ࡾࠊ13 ே࡛ᵓᡂࡉࢀࠊᚲせᛂࡌ࡚⌮ࡢᴗົࢆ⿵బࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ 㸺࣮ࣜࢲ࣮ࢩࢵࣉ࣭࢚࢜ࣜࣥࢸ࣮ࢩࣙࣥ㸼 Ꮫࡣࠊࢡࣞࢹࢸ࣮ࢩࣙࣥࡢ 2 ᖺ㛫๓࣮ࣜࢲ࣮ࢩࢵࣉ࣭࢚࢜ࣜࣥࢸ࣮ࢩࣙࣥࢆཷ ࡅ࡞ࡅࢀࡤ࡞ࡽ࡞࠸ࠋ࠼ࡤࠊᖺࠊ2011 ᖺࢡࣞࢹࢸ࣮ࢩࣙࣥࢆ᭦᪂ࡍࡿᏛࡣࠊ 2 ᖺ๓ࡢ 2009 ᖺཷࡅࡿࡇ࡞ࡿࠋࡇࡢ࢚࢜ࣜࣥࢸ࣮ࢩࣙࣥࡣྛᏛࡽ 5 ேࡢࣜ ࣮ࢲ࣮ࡀཧຍࡍࡿࡼ࠺せㄳࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ㏻ᖖ 1 ᅇࡢ࢚࢜ࣜࣥࢸ࣮ࢩ࡛ࣙࣥ⣙ 40㹼45 Ꮫࡀ ཧຍࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋྛᏛࡽࡢཧຍ⪅ࡣ୍⯡ⓗࠊᏛ㛗ࠊᩍົᢸᙜᏛ㛗ࠊ㈈ົᢸᙜࠊᏛົ ᢸᙜࠊInstitutional Effectiveness ᢸᙜࡢ 5 ே࡛࠶ࡿࠋ࣮࣡ࢡࢩࣙࢵࣉ࡛ࡣࠊホ౯ࡑࡢ ‽ഛࡘ࠸࡚ㄝ᫂ࡍࡿࠋࡑࡢᚋࠊOn-Site Review ࡢ᪥⛬ࢆỴࡵࠊྠࡌᏛ࡛ྠࡌ᪥ࢆᕼᮃ ࡋ࡚ࡁࡓሙྜࡣㄪᩚࢆ⾜ࡗ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ㏻ᖖࠊOn-Site Review ࡣࠊ⛅ᐇࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ 㸺ࢡࣞࢹࢸ࣮ࢩࣙࣥࣉࣟࢭࢫ㸼 ࢡࣞࢹࢸ࣮ࢩࣙࣥࡢ⥅⥆ཬࡧ᭦᪂ࢆࡋࡼ࠺࠸࠺ᏛࡣࠊCCR ࢆᥦฟࡋ࡞ࡅࢀࡤ࡞ ࡽ࡞࠸ࠋࡇࢀࡣࠊᇶ‽࡚㐺ྜࡋ࡚࠸ࡿ࠺ࢆド᫂ࡍࡿࡶࡢ࡛࠶ࡿࠋ㏻ᖖࡣࠊ࢜ࣜ ࢚ࣥࢸ࣮ࢩࣙࣥࡽ 18 ᭶ᚋᏛࡣ CCR ࢆᥦฟࡍࡿࠋࡇࢀࡣ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨࣭ホ౯ሗ࿌᭩࡛ ࠶ࡾࠊࡇࡢ୰୍㒊࡛ࡶ㐺ྜࡀ࠶ࡗࡓሙྜࡣࠊࡇࢀࢆ┤ࡕᨵၿࡋ࡞ࡅࢀࡤ࡞ࡽ࡞࠸ࠋ ࡇࡢಟṇࡍࡿᶵࡣ」ᩘᅇタࡅ࡚࠸ࡿࠋSACS ࡛ࡣࠊOff-Site Review Committee ࡀࡲࡎ ࡇࡢ CCR ࡢෆᐜࢆ☜ㄆࡍࡿࠋ Off-Site Review Committee ࡢ࣓ࣥࣂ࣮ࡣࠊᐇ㝿ホ౯ࡍࡿホ౯ဨ࡛࠶ࡿࠋSACS ࡢࢫ ࢱࢵࣇࡣ࠶ࡃࡲ࡛ࡶົࢫࢱࢵࣇ࡛࠶ࡾࠊ㆟Ỵᶒࢆᣢࡓ࡞࠸ࠋࡑࢀࡒࢀࡢศ㔝ࡈ Off-Site Review Committee ࢆタࡅホ౯ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋࡇࡢ Off-Site Review Committee ࡀ CCR ࢆホ౯ࡋࠊ㐺ྜ㐺ྜࢆุ᩿ࡍࡿࠋ㐺ྜ࠸࠺ุ᩿ࡀ࡞ࡉࢀࡓሙྜࠊࡇࡢ⤖ᯝ ࢆᏛ㏻▱ࡋࠊᨵၿࢆồࡵࡿࠋ㐺ྜุ᩿ࡉࢀࡓᏛࡣࡇࢀࢆ┤ࡕᨵၿࡋ࡞ࡅࢀࡤ ࡞ࡽ࡞࠸ࠋᨵၿࡉࢀࡓෆᐜࡣࠊFocused Report ࡋ࡚ሗ࿌᭩ࢆࡲࡵࠊSACS ᥦฟࡋ࡞ ࡅࢀࡤ࡞ࡽ࡞࠸ࠋSACS ࡢ㛗 1 ேࡣࠊྛጤဨࡀᥦฟࡉࢀࡓ CCR ࢆ㐺ษࠊཎ๎ ↷ࡽࡋྜࢃࡏุ࡚᩿ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿ࠺ࢆ☜ㄆࡍࡿᙺࢆᯝࡓࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ 㐺ྜ࡛࠶ࡗࡓ㡯㛵ࡍࡿᨵၿ≧ἣࡢෆᐜࡀグ㏙ࡉࢀ࡚࠸ࡿ Focused Report ࡀᏛ ࡽᥦฟࡉࢀࡓሙྜࡣࠊOn-Site Review Committee ࡀࡑࡢෆᐜࢆホ౯ࡍࡿࠋᏛࢆᐇ㝿 ゼၥࡋࠊFocused Report グ㍕ࡉࢀࡓෆᐜࡀ㐺ษᐇࡉࢀ࡚࠸ࡿ࠺ࢆ☜ㄆࡍࡿࠋ Off-Site Review Committee ࡢホ౯࡛㐺ྜホ౯ࡉࢀࡓ㡯┠ᑐࡋ࡚ࠊᨵၿࡉࢀ㐺ྜ ࡞ࡗ࡚࠸ࡿ࠺ࢆ☜ㄆࡍࡿࠋ Focused Report ࢆᏛࡀᥦฟࡍࡿྠᏛࡢ㉁ᙉィ⏬ࡋ࡚ QEP ࡶᥦฟࡍࡿࠋ 111 ᐇ㝿Ꮫࢆゼၥࡍࡿ 4 㐌㛫ࡽ 6 㐌㛫๓ On-Site Review Committee QEP ࡀᥦฟ ࡉࢀࡿࠋ ࡇࡢ QEP ࡀᥦฟࡉࢀࡿࠊࡑࢀࡽᐇ㝿ࡑࡢᏛࢆゼၥࡍࡿࡲ࡛ࡢ㛫࡛ࠊᏛ SACS ࡢ㛫࡛ࡢ㟁ヰ㆟࡞ࡀ⾜ࢃࢀࡿࠋࡇࡢ㟁ヰ㆟࡛㒊ศࡢ☜ㄆࡀ࡛ࡁࡿࠋᏛ ࡽࡢᅇ⟅ࡼࡗ࡚ࠊࡑࡢάືෆᐜࠊ⤖ᯝࡢ≧ἣࡀホ౯࡛ࡁࡓሙྜࡣࠊᏛゼၥࡣࠊ ࡢᩥ᭩ࡢ☜ㄆࠊᢸᙜ⪅ࡢ㠃ㄯࡸ࢟ࣕࣥࣃࢫࡢぢᏛ࡞ࠊయⓗ࡞ෆᐜࢆ☜ㄆࡍࡿᴗ ົ࡞ࡿࠋ ホ౯ဨࡣࠊᐖࡢᑐ❧ࢆ㑊ࡅࡿࡓࡵࠊホ౯ࡢᑐ㇟࡞ࡗ࡚࠸ࡿᏛࡀ࠶ࡿᕞ௨እࡢᕞ ࡽ㑅ᐃࡍࡿࠋ࠼ࡤࠊࢪ࣮ࣙࢪᕤ⛉Ꮫࢆホ౯ࡍࡿ࠸࠺ࡇ࡛࠶ࢀࡤࠊSACS ࡀ⟶㎄ ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿ 11 ᕞࡢ࠺ࡕࢪ࣮ࣙࢪᕞ௨እࡢ 10 ᕞࡽࡢホ౯ဨࡀホ౯ࢆ⾜࠺ࠋ ඛ㏙ࡢ㟁ヰࡼࡿ㆟ࡢࠊࢥࢿࢡࢺࣉࣟ࠸࠺ࡶࡢࢆࡗࡓࣅࢹ࢜㆟ࡢᢏ⾡ࡀ ࠶ࡿࡀࠊࡇࢀࡣࣁ࣮ࢻࢯࣇࢺࢆᚲせࡍࡿࡓࡵࡲࡔయⓗࡣᬑཬࡋ࡚࠸࡞࠸ࡀࠊSACS ࡣࡑࡢタഛࡀᩚഛࡉࢀ࡚࠸ࡿࡢ࡛≉ᐃࡢᏛࡢ࢚ࣇ࢙ࢡࢸࣈࢿࢫ㛵ࡍࡿࣅࢹ࢜㆟ ࢆࡇࡢࢩࢫࢸ࣒ࢆࡗ࡚⾜࠺ࡇࡶྍ⬟࡛࠶ࡿࠋ Off-Site Review Committee ࡣࢺࣛࣥࢱ㞟ࡲࡗ࡚㆟ࢆ⾜࠺ࡀࠊOn-Site Review Committee ࡣホ౯ဨࡀᏛࢆゼၥࡍࡿࠋOn-Site Review ࡣࠊ㏻ᖖ 3 ᪥㛫࡛⾜࠸ࠊ1 ࢳ࣮ ࣒ࡀ 1 Ꮫࢆᢸᙜࡍࡿࠋ 㸺ホ౯ᮇ㛫୰Ꮫࡀᨵၿࡍࡿᶵࢆ㸱ᅇ㸼 Ꮫࡀホ౯ᮇ㛫୰㐺ྜホ౯ࡉࢀࡓ㡯ࢆᨵၿࡋሗ࿌࡛ࡁࡿࢳࣕࣥࢫࡣ 3 ᅇ࠶ࡿࠋ ࡲࡎࠊOff-Site Review Committee ࡀホ౯ࢆࡋࡓ Off-Site Review ࡢ⤖ᯝࠊ㐺ྜࡀ࠶ࡗ ࡓሙྜࡣࠊࡑࢀࢆᨵၿࡋࠊFocused Report ࢆసᡂࡋᥦฟࡍࡿࠋࡇࢀࡘ࠸࡚ࡣ On-Site Review Committee ࡀ On-Site Review ☜ㄆࡍࡿࠋḟ On-Site Review ࡢ⤖ᯝࠊ㐺 ྜࡀ࠶ࡗࡓሙྜࡣࠊ㐺ྜࡢࡓࡵᨵၿࡋࠊࡶ࠺୍ᗘࡇࡢ࣏࣮ࣞࢺࢆᥦฟ࡛ࡁࡿࢳࣕࣥࢫࡀ ࠼ࡽࢀࡿࠋࡇࡢ࣏࣮ࣞࢺࡣ Commission ᥦฟࡉࢀࡿࠋ᭱⤊ࡢ Commission ࡛ࡣࢩࢽ ࡢ࣓ࣥࣂ࣮ࡀホ౯ࢆࡋࠊ᭱⤊ⓗ⌮ㅎࡿࡇ࡞ࡿࡀࠊࡑࡢ๓ࡶ࠺୍ᗘ㐺ྜ࡛࠶ ࡗࡓሙྜࡣᨵၿࡢࢳࣕࣥࢫࢆ࠼ࡿࠋ ⥅⥆ホ౯ࡢࣉࣟࢭࢫၥ㢟ࡀ࡞࠸ሙྜࡣࠊࡢࢻ࣓࢟ࣗࣥࢺࡢᥦฟࢆồࡵࡿࡇࡣ࡞ ࠸ࠋ㐺ྜ࡛࠶ࡗ࡚ࡶࠊSection 2 㛵ࡋ࡚ၥ㢟ࡀ࠶ࡗࡓሙྜࡣࠊࣔࢽࢱࣜࣥࢢ࣏࣮ࣞࢺࡢ ᥦฟࢆồࡵࡿࠋࡇࡇ࡛ࡣఱࡀၥ㢟࡞ࡢࠊࡢࡼ࠺ࡋ࡚࠸ࡘࡲ࡛ᨵၿࡍࡿࡢࠊ࡞ ࡀ♧ࡉࢀ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ㏻ᖖ 6 ᭶ࡽ 12 ᭶௨ෆ࣏࣮ࣞࢺࢆᥦฟࡋࠊࡋ࡞ࡅࢀࡤ࡞ࡽ ࡞࠸ࠋࡑࡢ⤖ᯝࡣ Commission ሗ࿌ࡉࢀࡿࠋ 㸺ࣔࢽࢱࣜࣥࢢᮇ㛫㸼 ᭱⤊ⓗ㐺ྜ࡞㡯ࡀ࠶ࡗࡓሙྜࡣࠊ2 ᖺ௨ෆᨵၿ່࿌ࢆฟࡍࠋSanction ࢆ 3 ẁ㝵 ࣞ࣋ࣝศࡅᏛᨵၿࢆಁࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ1 ࡘࡣ Warning㸦㆙࿌㸧 ࠊ2 ࡘ┠ࡣࠊProbation㸦ಖ ␃㸧ࠊࡑࡋ࡚᭱ᚋࡀ Lose Membership㸦࣓ࣥࣂ࣮ࢩࢵࣉ႙ኻ㸧࡛࠶ࡿࠋ ࣔࢽࢱࣜࣥࢢᮇ㛫ࡣࠊ Warning ࡢᮇ㛫ࡀ 2 ᖺ㛫ࠊ Probation ࡢᮇ㛫ࢆ 2 ᖺ㛫タࡅ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ ࡇࡢ WarningࠊProbation ࡑࢀࡒࢀࡢࣔࢽࢱࣜࣥࢢࡀ 2 ᖺ㛫࠶ࡿࡼ࠺ࠊ㐺ྜࡀ࠶ࢀ ࡤࡍࡄ࣓ࣥࣂ࣮ࢩࢵࣉࢆ႙ኻࡍࡿ࠸࠺ࡼ࠺࡞ࡇࡣ⾜ࡗ࡚࠸࡞࠸ࠋࡑࡢᏛᨵၿࡍ 112 ࡿពᛮ⾲♧ࡀ࠶ࢀࡤࠊࡉࡲࡊࡲ࡞ᙧ࡛⊰ணࢆ࠼࡚࠸ࡿࠋࡲࡎࡣ Warning ᮇ㛫ࡋ࡚ 6 ᭶࠼ࠊࡑࡇ࡛࠼ࡤࣇ࢝ࣝࢸࡀࡲࡔ༑ศ࡛࡞࠸ሙྜ࡞ࡣᮇ㛫ࢆ 6 ᭶ᘏ㛗ࡋ ࡚࣏࣮ࣞࢺࢆᥦฟࡉࡏࡿ࡞ࠊ ᭱㛗 2 ᖺ㛫ࡲ࡛⊰ணࢆ࠼ࡿࡇࡀ࡛ࡁࡿࡼ࠺ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ ᭱⤊ⓗ Commission ࡀࠊࡇࡢᏛࡣᨵၿࡢవᆅࡀ࡞࠸ุ᩿ࡋࡓሙྜࡣࠊಖ␃ࠊࡶ ࡋࡃࡣ࣓ࣥࣂ࣮ࢩࢵࣉ႙ኻ࠸࠺ุ᩿ࢆࡍࡿࠋ ≧ἣࡼࡗ࡚ࡣࠊ୍ࡘၥ㢟ࡀ࠶ࡾᨵၿࢆࡍ ࡿࡇ࡞ࡗࡓᏛ࡛ࡶࠊࡑࡢᚋࠊูࡢၥ㢟 ࡀὴ⏕ⓗ㉳ࡇࡿሙྜࡀ࠶ࡿࠋ࠼ࡤࠊ㈈ᨻ ࡢၥ㢟࡞ࢥ࡞せồ㡯┠࡛࠶ࡿ 2.11 ࡢ 㡯┠࡞ࡣࡢၥ㢟ࢆేⓎࠊㄏⓎࡍࡿྍ⬟ ᛶࡀ࠶ࡿࠋ㈈ᨻࡀᝏࡍࡿ࠸࠺ࡇࡣࠊᩍ ⫋ဨࡢ᥇⏝ၥ㢟࡞ࡶࡘ࡞ࡀࡾࡡ࡞࠸ࠋ ࣜࢯ࣮ࢫࡀ࡞࠸࠸࠺ࡇࡣࠊィ⏬ࡀ࠶ࡗ࡚ ࡶάືࡀ࡛ࡁ࡞࠸࠸࠺ࡇ࡛࠶ࡾࠊ㔜せ࡞ ၥ㢟࡛࠶ࡿࠋࡇࡢࡼ࠺ᨵၿࢆಁࡋ࡚ࡶ࠺ࡋࡼ࠺ࡶ࡞࠸ሙྜࡢࡳ᭱⤊ⓗ࣓ࣥࣂ࣮ࢩ ࢵࣉ႙ኻ࠸࠺ุᐃࢆࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ ࡇࡢࡼ࠺ࠊᏛᑐࡋ࡚ࡣࠊከࡃࡢᨵၿࡢࡓࡵࡢࢳࣕࣥࢫࢆ࠼࡚࠸ࡿࠋࡋࡋࠊ᭱ ⤊ⓗ Commission ࡀᏛࡢ࣓ࣥࣂ࣮ࢩࢵࣉࢆ႙ኻࡋࡓሙྜࠊᏛഃࡣࠊࡇࢀࢆ᭹ࡋ ࡚ࠊุᡤࡇࡢุ᩿ᑐࡍࡿッゴࢆ㉳ࡇࡍࡇࡀ࡛ࡁࡿࠋࡇࢀࡲ࡛ࡢッゴ࠾࠸࡚ࡣ ࡚ SACS ࡀッࡋ࡚࠾ࡾࠊSACS ࡢุ᩿ࡣ㛫㐪ࡗ࡚࠸࡞ࡗࡓࡇࡀド᫂ࡉࢀ࡚࠸ࡿࠋࡲ ࡓࠊᏛᑐࡋ࡚ࠊከࡃࡢᨵၿࡢࡓࡵࡢࢳࣕࣥࢫࢆ࠼࡚࠸ࡿࡢ࡛ࠊᐇ㝿ッゴࡀ㉳ࡇࡗ ࡓࡋ࡚ࡶࠊ㈇ࡅࡿࡼ࠺࡞ࡇࡣ࡞࠸࠸࠺ࡇ࡛࠶ࡗࡓࠋ 㸺㹏㹃㹎㸦㉁ྥୖィ⏬᭩㸧ࡢᐇ㸼 QEP ࢆ☜ᐇᐇࡋ࡞ࡅࢀࡤ࡞ࡽ࡞࠸ࠋࡑࡢ᪉ἲࡋ࡚ࡣࠊࡲࡎࠊࢹ࣮ࢱࡢ㞟ά⏝ ࡛࠶ࡿࠋQEP ࣉࣟࢭࢫࡢసᡂཬࡧᐇࡘ࠸࡚ࡣࠊ࣐ࢽࣗࣝࢆసᡂࡋᏛ♧ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ ࡇࡢ QEP ࡢࣉࣟࢭࢫࡢホ౯ࡋ࡚ࡣࠊᏛ⏕ࡢᏛಟᡂᯝࡢホ౯Ꮫ⏕ࡢᏛಟ⎔ቃཬࡧࢧ࣏ ࣮ࢺయไࡢホ౯ࢆ⾜࠺ࠋࡇࢀࡣ 5 ᖺ 1 ᅇࠊ୰㛫ホ౯ࡋ࡚ᐇࡉࢀࡿࠋࡇࡢ୰㛫ホ౯࡛ ࡶࠊ14 㡯┠ࡘ࠸࡚ QEP ࢆホ౯ࡍࡿࡇ࡞ࡿࡀࠊࡇࡇ࡛ࡶ㐺ྜホ౯ࡉࢀࡿሙྜࡀ ࠶ࡿࠋࡇࡢሙྜࡣᣦࡉࢀࡓ㡯ࢆᨵၿࡍࡿᮇ㝈ࡀỴࡵࡽࢀࡿࠋ᭱⤊ⓗᨵၿࡉࢀ࡞࠸ ሙྜࡣࠊSanction ࡋ࡚࣓ࣥࣂ࣮ࢩࢵࣉࢆ႙ኻࡍࡿ࠸࠺ࡇࡶ࠶ࡾᚓࡿࠋ 㸺ྛ✀ጤဨ㸼 On-Site Review Committee ࡣࠊ⥅⥆ホ౯ࡢጤဨ࡛࠶ࡿࡀࠊࡑࡢ Special Committee㸦≉ูጤဨ㸧ࡀ࠶ࡿࠋࡇࢀࡣ࠼ࡤࠊ5 ᖺࡢ୰㛫ホ౯ࡢ㐺ྜࡀ࠶ࡾࠊ ࡑࢀࡀ㏻ᖖࡢุᐃ㛵ࢃࡽ࡞࠸ࡀࠊ㔜࡞ၥ㢟ࡀ࠶ࡿ࠸࠺ሙྜࡣࠊ≉ูጤဨࡀタ⨨ ࡉࢀࡿࠋࡇࡢጤဨࡣࠊ࠶ࡿ≉ᐃࡢၥ㢟ࢆホ౯ࠊ᳨ウࡍࡿࡓࡵࠊᖖタࡢጤဨࡼࡾࡶᑡ࡞ ࠸ጤဨࠊ᭱ᑠ࡛ 3 ேࡃࡽ࠸ࡢጤဨ࡛ᵓᡂࡉࢀࡿࠋ Special Committee ࢆ⦅ไࡍࡿࡶ࠺୍ࡘࡢ⌮⏤ࡣࠊࢧࣈࢫࢱࣥࢩ࣭ࣕࣝࢳ࢙ࣥࢪ࠸࠺ Ꮫ㝔ࡢタ⨨࡞ SACS ࡀ༊ศࡋ࡚࠸ࡿ 6 ࡘࡢࣞ࣋ࣝ㸦Ꮫ㒊ࡣࣞ࣋ࣝ 1ࠊ2ࠊᏛ㝔ࡣࣞ 113 ࣋ࣝ 3㹼6㸧ኚ᭦ࡀ⏕ࡌࡿሙྜࠊOn-Site Review Committee Special Committee ࡢ࣓ ࣥࣂ࣮ࡀຍࢃࡾࠊᐇ㝿ࡑࡢᏛࡀࡑࡢᚲせ㡯ࢆ‶㊊ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿ࠸࠺ࡇࢆ☜ㄆࡍࡿࠋ Ꮫࡀ࣓ࣥࣂ࣮ࡋ࡚ᢎㄆࡉࢀࡿࡲ࡛ࡣ᭱ప 4 ᖺࡿࠋࡇࡢ 4 ᖺ࠸࠺ࡢࡣࠊ࡚ ࡢࣉࣟࢭࢫࡀࡃၥ㢟࡞ࡃࢫ࣒࣮ࢬᐇࡋࡓሙྜ࡛ࠊࡑࡢ㛫ࠊఱၥ㢟ࡀ࠶ࡗࡓሙྜ ࡣࡑࢀࢆಟṇࡍࡿࡓࡵ 2 ᖺࡿࠋࡑࡢࠊఱၥ㢟ࡀ࠶ࡗࡓሙྜࡣ᭦ 6 ᖺ ࡿࠋࡑࢀ࡛ࡶၥ㢟ࡀゎỴࡉࢀ࡞࠸ሙྜࡸࡢၥ㢟ࡀ⏕ࡌࡓሙྜࡣ᭱ึࡽࢡࣞ ࢹࢸ࣮ࢩࣙࣥࢆࡸࡾ┤ࡉ࡞ࡅࢀࡤ࡞ࡽ࡞࠸ࠋ 㸦ఀ⸨ ᩄᘯ ᪥ᮏ㧗➼ᩍ⫱ホ౯ᶵᵓホ౯ᴗ㒊㛗㸧 114 ϩ (PRU\8QLYHUVLW\ (PRU\8QLYHUVLW\ ࠙ゼၥ᪥ࠚᖹᡂ 23(2011)ᖺ 7 ᭶ 12 ᪥ ࠙Ꮫࡢᴫせࠚ ఫᡤ㸸201 Dowman Drive, Atlanta, Georgia 30322㸭タ⨨ᙧែ㸸⚾❧ࠊ4 ᖺไ㸭Ꮫ㸸 B.M.D㸭Ꮫ⏕ᩘ㸸13,893 ே㸭᭱ึ┤㏆ࡢࢡࣞࢹࢸ࣮ࢩࣙࣥ㸦ᶵ㛵࣭ཷᑂᖺ㸧 㸸SACS 㸦1917 ᖺ㸭2003 ᖺ㸧 ࠙㠃ㄯ⪅ࠚ David Jordan Ặ࣭࣭࣭Director, Office of Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness ࠙ゼၥㄪᰝဨࠚ ⩚⏣✚⏨㸦᪥ᮏᏛᩥ⌮Ꮫ㒊ᩍᤵ㸧 ࠊ㧗ᶫ ᏹ㸦ᮾிᅜ㝿ᏛᏛ㛗࣭ᩍᤵ㸧 ࠊ ఀ⸨ᩄᘯ㸦ホ౯ᶵᵓホ౯ᴗ㒊㛗㸧 ࠊ㝣 㚝᪳㸦ホ౯ᶵᵓホ౯ᴗ㒊ḟ㛗㸧 ࠙ゼၥㄪᰝࡢᴫせࠚ Emory University㸦௨ୗ EU ࠸࠺㸧ࡣࠊ࣓࣭ࣜ࢝ⱥᅜᅜᩍὴࡢ࣓ࢯࢪࢫࢺ༠ ࡼࡾ 1836 ᖺ Emory College ࡋ࡚ࢪ࣮ࣙࢪᕞ࢜ࢵࢡࢫࣇ࢛࣮ࢻタ❧ࡉࢀࡓࠋࡑࡢ ᚋ Emory College ࡣ 1800 ᖺ௦ᮎⓎᒎࢆጞࡵࠊ1914 ᖺࡲ࡛࣓ࢯࢪࢫࢺ༠ࡼࡿ⥲ྜ Ꮫタ❧ࡢィ⏬ࢆ⤒࡚ࠊ1915 ᖺ⌧ᅾࡢᆅ EU ࢆタ❧ࡋࡓࠋ EU ࡣ⌧ᅾࠊᏛ㒊ࡋ࡚ Emory College of Arts and Sciences ཬࡧࡑࡢࡢ 3 ࡘࡢᏛ 㒊㸦ྜィ 4 Ꮫ㒊㸧ࢆᣢࡕࠊேᩥ࣭♫⛉ᏛࠊᩘᏛ࣭⮬↛⛉Ꮫཬࡧ┳ㆤ࡞ࡢᖜᗈ࠸ᩍ⫱ࢆ ᥦ౪ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋࡲࡓᏛ㝔࡛ࣞ࣋ࣝࡣ 7 ࡘࡢ◊✲⛉࣭ᑓ㛛⫋Ꮫ㝔ࢆ᭷ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋࡍ࡞ࢃ ࡕࠊGoizueta Business School, James T. Laney School of Graduate Studies, School of Law, School of Medicine, Nell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing, Rollins School of Public Health, Candler School of Theology ࡀ࠶ࡿࠋ୰࡛ࡶࠊࣅࢪࢿࢫࠊ་Ꮫࠊἲᚊ⣔ิ ࡢᏛ㝔ࡣࠊ ࠕU.S. News & World Report's 2013 "America's Best Graduate Schools"࡛ࠖ ࣓ࣜ࢝ࡢࢺࢵࣉ 25 ௨ෆධࡿࡶࡢࡋ࡚㧗ࡃホ౯ࡉࢀ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ ࡑࡢ࠺ࡕࠊ Ꮫ㒊⏕ࡀ 7,441 EU ࡢᅾ⡠Ꮫ⏕ᩘࡣࠊ 2011 ᖺ⛅Ꮫᮇ࡛⥲ᩘࡀ 13,893 ே࡛࠶ࡿࠋ ேࠊᏛ㝔⏕ࡀ 6,452 ே࡛࠶ࡿࠋ 㸯㸬ࢡࣞࢹࢸ࣮ࢩࣙࣥᐇࡢ㈐௵యไ EU ࠾ࡅࡿࢡࣞࢹࢸ࣮ࢩࣙࣥࡢᐇయไࡣࠊOffice of Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness (IRPE)ࡀ㈐௵ࢆᣢࡘᙧ࡞ࡗ࡚࠸ࡿࠋࡇࡢ IRPE ࡢࡣࠊ ༢⊃⩏ࡢࠕࢡࣞࢹࢸ࣮ࢩࣙࣥࠖᙜࡓࡿࡔࡅ࡛࡞ࡃࠊయࡋ࡚ࠊᏛⓗ࡞ᗈࡀࡾ ࢆᣢࡘᡓ␎ⓗィ⏬❧ࠊ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨ホ౯ࠊࢡࣞࢹࢸ࣮ࢩࣙࣥࠊࢹ࣮ࢱࢆᇶ♏ࡋࡓពᛮ Ỵᐃࢆ EU ࡀ⾜࠺㝿ࠊࡑࢀࡽࡢᐇࢆᨭࡋࠊ⤫ྜࡍࡿࡇ࠶ࡿࠋIRPE ࡢ⤌⧊ࡣࠊ ୗࡢᅗࡲࡵࡓࡼ࠺࡞ᙧ࡛࠶ࡾࠊලయⓗࡣ Makeba Morgan Hill Ặࡀࠊ(1) Assistant 117 Vice Provost for Planning and Accreditation ࡋ࡚ᑵ௵ࡋࠊࡑࡢୗ 2 ேࡢ Director㸦୍ ேࡣ David Jordan Ặ㸸(2.1) Director of Institutional Effectivenessࠊࡶ࠺୍ேࡣ Daniel Teodorescu Ặ㸸(2.2) Director of the Office of Institutional Research㸧ࡀ࠸ࡿࠋ ᅗ ,53( ࡢ⤌⧊యไ (1) Assistant Vice Provost (2. 1) Director of Institutional Effectiveness (3.1) Senior Planning Associate (2.2) Director of the Office of Institutional Research (3.2) Assistant Director for Institutional Research (4.1) Program Administrative Assistant (5.1) Graduate Research Assistant (3.3) Assistant Director for Evaluation and Survey Research (4.2) Administrative Assistant (5.2) Graduate Research Assistant 㸦ฟ:ࡇࡢᅗࡣࠊ⪺ࡁྲྀࡾㄪᰝཬࡧ EU ࡢ࣮࣒࣮࣍࣌ࢪࢆཧ⪃ࡋ࡚➹⪅ࡀసᡂ㸧 ୖࡢ IRPE ⤌⧊ࡢ࠺ࡕࠊせ࡞ᙺ⫋⪅ࡢ௵ົ࣭ᙺ࡞ࡣ௨ୗࡢ࠾ࡾ࡛࠶ࡿࠋ (1)Assistant Vice Provost㸦Ꮫົᇳ⾜Ꮫ㛗㸸Morgan Hill Ặ㸧ࡢ௵ົࡣࠊձEU ࡢᡓ␎ ⓗィ⏬άືࢆᨭ࣭ㄪᩚࡋղᡓ␎ⓗィ⏬ࡢ᥎㐍࣭ᡂᯝᐇ⌧㛵ࡋ࡚ᐇ㈐௵⪅ࡓࡕ ຓゝࢆ࠼ճ᪂ࡓ࡞ィ⏬ࢶ࣮ࣝࡢ㛤Ⓨࢆಁ㐍ࡋմᏛయࡢඃඛⓗ࡞ᡓ␎ⓗィ⏬ࡢᐇ ࢆ≌ᘬࡋ࡚࠸ࡃࡇ࡛࠶ࡿࠋ࡞࠾ࠊྠẶࡣ SACS ࡢ࣓ࣥࣂ࣮࡛ࡶ࠶ࡾࠊEU ࡢࢡ ࣞࢹࢸ࣮ࢩࣙࣥ࠾࠸࡚ᯡせ࡞ᙺࢆᯝࡓࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ (2.1)Director㸦Institutional Effectiveness ࢆᢸᙜࡍࡿ㒊㛗㸸Jordan Ặ㸧ࡢᙺࡣࠊ Ꮫࡢ⤌⧊࣭ᶵ㛵ࡋ࡚ࡢຠ⋡ᛶࡢほⅬࡽࠊᩍᏛྛ⤌⧊୍࣭⯡ᩍ⫱ࣉࣟࢢ࣒࣭ࣛ⟶⌮ ཬࡧᩍ⫱ࢧ࣏࣮ࢺ⤌⧊㛵ࡋ࡚ࠊ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨ホ౯ᡭẁࡢ㛤Ⓨ࣭ᐇࢆ᥎㐍ࡍࡿࡇ࡛࠶ ࡿࠋ (2.2)Director㸦Institutional Research=IR ᴗົࢆᢸᙜࡍࡿ㒊㛗㸸Teodorescu Ặ㸧ࡢ௵ ົࡣࠊձᏛᶵ㛵ㄪᰝ㸦IR㸧ࡢ⟶⌮ղࢹ࣮ࢱࡢ㞟࣭ศᯒ࣭Ꮫෆ㓄ᕸճᏛෆࡢᩍᏛ࣭ ⟶⌮⤌⧊ᑐࡋ࡚ពᛮỴᐃᚲせ࡞ⓗ☜ሗࢆᥦ౪ࡍࡿࡇմᏛࢡࣞࢹࢸ࣮ࢩ ࣙࣥάືࡢᨭࠊࡑࡋ࡚յᏛࡢᡓ␎ⓗィ⏬ࡢ㐍ᤖ≧ἣࡢホ౯ࠊ௨ୖ࡛࠶ࡿࠋ (3.1)Senior Planning Associate㸸ᡓ␎ⓗィ⏬ཬࡧ࣐ࢿࢪ࣓ࣥࢺᑐࡋ࡚ᢏ⾡ⓗ࡞ᨭࢆ ⾜࠺ࠋ (3.2)Assistant Director for Institutional Research㸸Ꮫ⏕ࡀࢥࣥࣆ࣮ࣗࢱࡢ௬ୡ⏺ ཧຍࡋࠊὶࢆ῝ࡵࠊᐇ⦼ࢆୖࡆࡿ࠸ࡗࡓࠕࢭ࢝ࣥࢻ࣭ࣛࣇࠖࡢ◊✲ࢆ⾜ࡗ࡚࠾ ࡾࠊIRPE ࠾ࡅࡿᙼࡢᙺࡣࠊࡇ࠺ࡋࡓ௬ୡ⏺ࡢ⎔ቃࡀᚿ㢪⪅ࡢເ㞟ࡢࡼ࠺ ᙺ❧ࡘࢆ◊✲ࡍࡿࡇ࡛࠶ࡿࠋ (3.3)Assistant Director for Evaluation and Survey Research㸸ࢧ࣮࣋ㄪᰝࠊᏛ⏕࣭ ᩍဨ࣭ᩍ⫱ࣉࣟࢢ࣒ࣛࡢホ౯ࠊࢹ࣮ࢱศᯒࠊㄪᰝ⤖ᯝࡢྲྀࡾࡲࡵࢆ⾜࠺ࡇࠊࡑࡋ ࡚Ꮫࡢᩍ⫋ဨ࣭Ꮫ⏕㛵ࡍࡿ⤫ィㄪᰝ㸦ࢭࣥࢧࢫ㸧ࢆ⾜࡞࠸ࠊᏛᙜᒁሗ࿌ࡍࡿ 118 ࡇ࡛࠶ࡿࠋ (4)ࡢࣞ࣋ࣝ௨ୗࡢᢸᙜ⪅ࡢᙺࡣࠊ⣬ᖜࡢ㒔ྜ࡛ࠊࡇࡇ࡛ࡣ┬␎ࡍࡿࠋ 㸰㸬㹑㸿㹁㹑ࡢㄆᐃᐇ⦼ EU ࡣࠊຍ┕ࡍࡿ Southern Association of Colleges and Schools㸦༡㒊ᆅ༊ᇶ‽༠ࠊ ௨ୗ SACS ࠸࠺㸧ࡢࢡࣞࢹࢸ࣮ࢩࣙࣥࢆ᭱ึཷࡅࡓࡢࡣ 1917 ᖺ࡛࠶ࡿࠋ᭱㏆ࡢ ࢡࣞࢹࢸ࣮ࢩࣙࣥࡣ 2003 ᖺ࡛࠶ࡾࠊḟᮇࡣ 2013 ᖺ⏦ㄳࢆ⾜࠸ࠊ2014 ཷࡅࡿண ᐃ࡛࠶ࡿࠋ㐣ཤࡢࢡࣞࢹࢸ࣮ࢩ࡛ࣙࣥࡣࠊ࠸ࡎࢀࡶㄆᐃࡉࢀ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ 㸱㸬ࢡࣞࢹࢸ࣮ࢩࣙࣥࡢࣉࣟࢭࢫ EU ࠾ࡅࡿࢡࣞࢹࢸ࣮ࢩࣙࣥయไࡢయࡣࠊୖ㏙ࡢࡼ࠺ IRPE ࢜ࣇࢫࡀ୰ᚰ ࡞ࡾᐇࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋࡑࡇ࡛ࡶゐࢀࡓ࠾ࡾࠊIRPE ࡢࡣࠊ<1>Ꮫࡢᡓ␎ⓗィ⏬ࡢ ⟇ᐃ࣭ᐇࠊ<2>IR άືࠊ<3>࢘ࢺ࣒࢝ホ౯ࡢ᥎㐍ࠊ<4>ࢡࣞࢹࢸ࣮ࢩࣙࣥἲ௧ 㡰Ᏺࡢ☜❧࡛࠶ࡿࠋ EU ࡛ࡣࠊࢡࣞࢹࢸ࣮ࢩࣙࣥཬࡧࣇ࢛࣮ࣟࢵࣉయไࡋ࡚ࠊIRPE ࢜ࣇࢫࡢୖ Ꮫࢺࢵࣉࡢ CEO ࡋ࡚Ꮫ㛗ࡀ⨨ࡅࡽࢀࠊࡑࡢୗ࡛ Assistant Vice Provost, Director, Assistant Director, Associate ࡞ࡀ㓄⨨ࡉࢀࠊinstitutional effectiveness, research, study planning, compliance ࡢᴗ ົࢆศᢸࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ EU ࡢࢡࣞࢹࢸ࣮ࢩࣙࣥࡣࠊSACS ࡢ ᪉ᘧᇶ࡙࠸࡚ࠊ௨ୗࡢࡼ࠺࡞ࣉࣟࢭࢫࢆࡓ ࡿࠋEU ࡣࠊSACS ࡢつᐃᚑࡗ࡚ࠊ10 ᖺ ┠ࢡࣞࢹࢸ࣮ࢩࣙࣥࢆཷࡅࡿࡓࡵࠊ 2 ࡘࡢ㔜せ࡞ᥦฟ᭩㢮ࢆ⏝ពࡍࡿࠋ୍ࡘࡣࠊ Compliance Certification Report㸦ࢥࣥࣉࣛ ࣥࢫሗ࿌᭩ࠊ௨ୗ CCR ࠸࠺㸧࡛࠶ࡾࠊ ࡇࢀࡣ SACS ࡢࠕPrinciples of Accreditation: Foundations for Quality Enhancementࠖ ࡛つᐃࡉࢀࡓ࡚ࡢᇶ‽㛵ࡋ࡚ EU ࠾ࡅࡿ㐩ᡂᗘ࡞ࢆ㐺ษ⮬ᕫホ౯ࡋࡓࡶࡢ࡛࠶ ࡿࠋࡇࡢ CCR ࡣࠊᩥ❶࡛ࡢグ㏙ࡢࠊEU ⮬ࡽࡢ⮬ᕫホ౯ุ࣭᩿ࡢ᰿ᣐࢆ♧ࡍ࢚ࣅࢹ ࣥࢫࢆྲྀࡾࡲࡵࡓࡶࡢ࡛ࠊ⤖ㄽࢆᚓࡿ࠾ࡼࡑ 15 ᭶๓ࡲ࡛ᥦฟࡍࡿࠋᥦฟᚋࠊࡇࡢ CCR ࡣ Off-Site Review Committee㸦᭩㠃ホ౯ጤဨ㸧㏦ࡉࢀࠊྠጤဨࡣ EU ࡀ SACS ࡢྛᇶ‽ࢆ‶ࡓࡋ࡚࠸ࡿྰ㛵ࡍࡿணഛⓗ࡞ホ౯⤖ᯝࢆᥦฟࡍࡿࠋࡇࡢホ౯⤖ ᯝࡣࠊOn-Site Review Committee㸦ᐇᆅホ౯ጤဨ㸧ࡢጤဨඹ᭷ࡉࢀࡿࠋ ࡶ࠺୍ࡘࡢ㔜せ࡞᭩㢮ࡣࠊQuality Enhancement Plan (㉁ྥୖィ⏬᭩ࠊ௨ୗ QEP ࠸ ࠺)࡛࠶ࡿࠋࡇࡇࡣࠊձᏛ㛵ࡍࡿ⮬ᕫホ౯ࡢࣉࣟࢭࢫղ࣮ࣛࢽࣥࢢ࣭࢘ࢺ࣒࢝୪ࡧ ࡑࢀಀࡿᏛಟ⎔ቃࡢᩚഛཬࡧᩍ⫱ࡢ┠ᶆ㐩ᡂྥࡅࡓ᮲௳ࡢᐇᗘճQEP ࡢసᡂ࣭㐙 ⾜࣭ᐇ⦼ಀࡿ⤌⧊⬟ຊմQEP ࡢసᡂ࣭ᐇ㛵ࡍࡿ㛵ಀ⪅ࡢྲྀ⤌ࡳ࣭㛵ࡢ≧ἣࠊࡑࡋ ࡚յQEP 㐩ᡂࢆホ౯ࡍࡿ┠ᶆ࣭ィ⏬ࠊࢆྲྀࡾࡲࡵࡿࠋࡑࡋ࡚ࠊQEP ࡣ 5 ᖺࡈసᡂ ࡉࢀࡿࡶࡢ࡛࠶ࡿࡀࠊࢡࣞࢹࢸ࣮ࢩࣙࣥࢆཷࡅࡿሙྜࡣࠊSACS ࡼࡿ On-Site Review ࡢ 4㹼6 㐌㛫๓ QEP ࢆᥦฟࡍࡿࡇ࡞ࡗ࡚࠾ࡾࠊᐇᆅホ౯ࡢせ࡞↔Ⅼࢆᥦ 119 ♧ࡍࡿࡶࡢ࡛࠶ࡿࠋ㻌 ࡲࡓࠊ࣓࡛ࣜ࢝ࡣ࠾ࡼࡑ 20 ᖺ๓㡭ࡽࠊཷ㦂⏕ཬࡧࡑࡢಖㆤ⪅ᑐࡍࡿሗࡢ㛤♧࣭ ᥦ౪ࡀࡲࡍࡲࡍ㔜せ࡛࠶ࡿࡢㄆ㆑ࡀ㧗ࡲࡾࠊᏛࡢ㉁ࢆ⥅⥆ⓗᨵၿࡍࡿࡇࡀせㄳࡉ ࢀࡿࡼ࠺࡞ࡗࡓࠋࡇ࠺ࡋࡓືࡁࢆཷࡅࠊEU ࢆึࡵࡍࡿ࣓ࣜ࢝ࡢㅖᏛࡣࠊ⥅⥆ᨵ ၿࡢࢩࢫࢸ࣒ࢆᑟධࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋEU ࡛ࡣ 4 ᖺ๓㸦2007 ᖺ㸧ࡽ⥅⥆ᨵၿࡢྲྀࡾ⤌ࡳࢆ⾜ࡗ ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ 㸲㸬ࢡࣞࢹࢸ࣮ࢩࣙࣥࣇ࢛࣮ࣟࢵࣉయไ EU ࡢࣇ࢛࣮ࣟࢵࣉయไࡣࠊ ẖᖺࡢ⥅⥆ᨵၿࡀࡑࢀ࠶ࡓࡿࡀࠊ ࡋࡋᚑ᮶ࡢ Progress Report ࠸࠺ࡶࡢ␗࡞ࡗࡓᤊ࠼᪉ࢆࡍࡿᚲせࡀ࠶ࡿࠋProgress Report ࡣࠊࢡࣞࢹ ࢸ࣮ࢩࣙࣥ࠾࠸࡚ࠊCCR ᥦ♧ࡋࡓᚋࡢㄢ㢟ࡸ SACS ࡼࡾᣦࡉࢀࡓᨵၿⅬ࣭ཧ ⪃ពぢ࡞ᑐᛂࡋࠊᏛࡀࡑࡢᚋࡢᨵၿࢆሗ࿌ࡍࡿᖺḟሗ࿌࡛࠶ࡿࡀࠊ⌧ᅾ EU ࡞࡛ ⾜ࡗ࡚࠸ࡿ⥅⥆ᨵၿࢩࢫࢸ࣒ࡣࠊ┠ⓗࡢⅬ࡛ࠊࡑࢀࡣ┤᥋⤖ࡧࡘ࠸࡚࠸࡞࠸ࠋ࡞ࡐ࡞ࡽࠊ EU ࡛ᐇࡋ࡚࠸ࡿ⥅⥆ᨵၿࢩࢫࢸ࣒ࡣࠊᏛ⊂⮬ࡢ┠ⓗ࣭ᇶ‽࣭㐩ᡂᗘ࡞ࢆᥖࡆࠊ⮬ ࡽࡢุ᩿ດຊࡼࡾࠊᏛࡋ࡚ࡢ㉁ⓗྥୖࢆయⓗᅗࢁ࠺ࡍࡿࡶࡢ࡛࠶ࡿࡽ࡛ ࠶ࡿࠋࢡࣞࢹࢸ࣮ࢩࣙࣥ⮬ࡽᥖࡆࡓㄢ㢟ࡸ SACS ࡞ࡽゝࢃࢀࡓࡇᑐᛂࡍ ࡿ࠸࠺ཷࡅ㌟ࡢࡶࡢ࡛ࡣ࡞࠸ࠋࡇࡢⅬࠊࡁ࡞≉ᚩࡀ࠶ࡿࠋ ࡞࠾ࠊࡇ࠺ࡋࡓ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨ホ౯యไࡢୗ࡛ࢡࣞࢹࢸ࣮ࢩࣙࣥࡢࡓࡵࡢ QEP ࢆసᡂࡍ ࡿࡀࠊࡑࢀ㈐௵ࢆ┤᥋ᣢࡘ⤌⧊ࡀ Compliance Committee ࡲࡓࡣ Certificate Committee㸦Ⅼ᳨ホ౯ጤဨ㸧࡛࠶ࡿࠋࡇࡢ Compliance Committee ࡣࠊࡑࡢୖ Leadership Committee㸦᥎㐍ጤဨ㸧ࡀ࠶ࡾࠊࡑࡢࡢ⤌⧊࡛࠶ࡿࠕᏛಟᡂᯝホ౯ጤ ဨࠖࠕ⟶⌮࣭ᩍ⫱ࢧ࣏࣮ࢺጤဨࠖ㐃ᦠࡋ࡞ࡀࡽࠊࢡࣞࢹࢸ࣮ࢩࣙࣥࡢᴗົ ᙜࡓࡿࠋࡘࡲࡾࠊࢡࣞࢹࢸ࣮ࢩࣙࣥࢆᢸᙜࡍࡿ㒊⨫ࡣࠊ௨ୖࡢ 4 ࡘࡢጤဨࡽ࡞ࡿ ⤌⧊య࡛࠶ࡿࠋࡇࢀࡽࡣࠊ㏻ᖖࡢ⥅⥆ⓗᨵၿࡢࡓࡵࡢጤဨ㐪࠸ࠊ┠ⓗࢆ㐩ᡂࡋࡓẁ㝵 ࡛ゎᩓࡉࢀࡿࡶࡢ࡛࠶ࡿࠋ 㸳㸬ࢡࣞࢹࢸ࣮ࢩࣙࣥࡢ⥅⥆ⓗ࡞ᨵၿࡢྲྀ⤌ࡳ EU ࡀࢡࣞࢹࢸ࣮ࢩࣙࣥࢆཷࡅࡿࡢᏛⓗ࡞యไࡋ࡚ࡣࠊୖ㏙ࡋࡓ IRPE ࡀ௵ ົࢆᐇ⾜ࡍࡿࡀࠊࡑࡇࡣࠕᏛಟᡂᯝホ౯ጤဨࠖࠕ⟶⌮࣭ᩍ⫱ࢧ࣏࣮ࢺጤဨࠖࡢ 2 ࡘࡢጤဨࡀ࠶ࡿࠋ๓⪅ࡀᏛ⾡㠃ಀࡿጤဨ࡛ࠊᚋ⪅ࡀ⟶⌮㐠Ⴀ㠃ࡢጤဨ࡛࠶ࡿࠋྛ Ꮫ㒊࡞ࡽᥦฟࡉࢀࡓホ౯⤖ᯝࢆ⤫ᣓࡍࡿࡓࡵࠊࡕࡽࡢጤဨࡶྛศ㔝ࡢ▱㆑ࡀ㇏ᐩ ࡛ࠊᣦᑟⓗ࡞❧ሙ࠶ࡿ࣓ࣥࣂ࣮ࡀᑵ௵ࡍࡿࡶࡢ࡛࠶ࡾࠊࡑࡋ࡚ࠊࡇࢀࡽ 2 ࡘࢆ᮰ࡡ࡚࠸ ࡿࡢࡀ David Jordan Ặࡢ Institutional Effectiveness㸦IE㸧ࡢ㒊⨫࡛࠶ࡿࠋࡇࡢ㒊⨫ࡣࠊ ୧ጤဨࡢࢧ࣏࣮ࢺࢆ⾜࠺ࡶࠊᚲせᛂࡌ࡚ᣦ♧ࢆฟࡍࡶࡢ࡛࠶ࡿࡀࠊࡑ࠺ࡋࡓ㛵 ࡢ┠ⓗࡣࠕホ౯ᩥࢆ㛤Ⓨࡍࡿࠖࡇ࡛࠶ࡿࠋ ⥅⥆ⓗ࡞ᨵၿࡢྲྀ⤌ࡳࡋ࡚ࠊIE 㒊⨫ࡣࠊᏛࡢᩍ⫱ࣉࣟࢢ࣒ࣛ㸦Ꮫ㒊࣭◊✲⛉࡞㸧 ࡢෆᐜࠊ⟶⌮࣭㐠Ⴀࠊ♫ࢧ࣮ࣅࢫࠊ◊✲άື࡞㛵ࡋ࡚ࠊᏛࡢ࣭┠ⓗࠊᨵၿィ ⏬ࡑࡢᐇయไࠊ⮬ᕫⅬ᳨ホ౯ࡢᐇయไࠊᏛ㤳⬻㒊ࡢᣦᑟຊ࡞ࡢほⅬࡽࠊ⥅⥆ ⓗ㐩ᡂᗘ࣭㐩ᡂ⬟ຊ࡞ࡢぢ┤ࡋᨵၿㄢ㢟ࡢᥦ♧࡞ࢆ⾜࠺ࡶࡢ࡛࠶ࡿࠋ 120 ᗘ☜ㄆࡍࡿࠊྛᏛ࡛⾜࠺⥅⥆ᨵၿάືࡣࠊSACS ࡞ࡢホ౯ᶵ㛵࠾ࡅࡿࢡࣞ ࢹࢸ࣮ࢩࣙࣥ┤᥋㛵㐃ࡍࡿࣞ࣋ࣝ௨ୖࡢෆᐜࢆྲྀୖࡆࡿࡶࡢ࡛࠶ࡾࠊSACS ࡢࡓࡵ ⾜࠺ࠊࢡࣞࢹࢸ࣮ࢩࣙࣥࢆཷᑂࡍࡿࡓࡵ࠸࠺ࡶࡢ࡛ࡶ࡞ࡃࠊ࠶ࡃࡲ࡛ࡶࠊᏛ ࡀ⊂⮬⾜࠺㉁ⓗᨵၿࡢࡓࡵࡢάື࡛࠶ࡿࠋ 㸴㸬㹑㸿㹁㹑ࡢุᐃᏛࡢุ᩿ࡀศࢀࡓࡢᑐᛂ SACS ࡢࢡࣞࢹࢸ࣮ࢩࣙࣥࡢᡭ⥆ࡁ࡛ࡣࠊᏛࡢ⏝ពࡋࡓ CCR ࡘ࠸࡚ࠊホ౯ ᙜࡓࡿㄪᰝጤဨࡀ Partial-Compliance㸦୍㒊‶ࡓࡋ࡚࠸ࡿ㸧ࡲࡓࡣ Non-Compliance㸦‶ ࡓࡋ࡚࠸࡞࠸㸧ࡢุᐃࢆࡋࡓࡇᑐࡋ࡚ࠊᏛഃࡋ࡚ࡑ࠺ࡋࡓุᐃ᭹ࡢሙྜࡘ ࠸࡚ࡣࠊ␗㆟⏦ࡋ❧࡚ࡢไᗘࡣ࡞࠸࠸࠺ࡇ࡛࠶ࡿࠋࡋࡋࠊOff-Site Review Committee ࡣࠊᏛࡀᥦฟࡍࡿሗ࿌᭩࠾ࡅࡿࣞࢫ࣏ࣥࢫࢆཷࡅ࡚ᑐᛂࡍࡿࠋࡑࢀࢆࡶ ࠊOn-Site Review Committee ࡀᐇᆅホ౯ᙜࡓࡾࠊᚲせ㡯ࢆ☜ㄆࡍࡿࠋࡑࡢ⤖ᯝࠊ ᨵၿࡍࡁ㡯ࡀ࠶ࢀࡤᏛࡣᣦࢆཷࡅࠊ࠼ࡤ 1 ᖺ࠶ࡿ࠸ࡣ 2 ᖺ௨ෆᨵၿࡀồࡵࡽ ࢀࡿࠋࡑ࠺ࡋࡓᨵၿࢆᐇ࡛ࡁ࡞ࡅࢀࡤࠊㄆᐃࡀྲྀࡾᾘࡉࢀࡿࡇ࡞ࡿࠋ ࡇࢀࡢ㛵㐃࡛␃ពࡍࡁࡇࡣࠊุᐃࡢᇶ‽㛵ࡋ࡚࡛࠶ࡿࠋSACS ࡞ࡢホ౯ᶵ㛵 ࡣࠊ㐃㑥ᨻᗓࡢồࡵࡿせ௳ࢆᏛࡀ‶ࡓࡋ࡚࠸ࡿྰࢆุ᩿ࡍࡿᇶ‽ࢆ᥇⏝ࡍࡿሙྜࡶ ࠶ࡿࡀࠊSACS ࡛ࡣࡑࢀࡒࢀࡢᩍ⫱ᶵ㛵࡛ᨻ ᗓࡢせ௳㛵ࡋ࡚⊂⮬ࡢゎ㔘ࢆࡍࡿࡇࢆㄆ ࡵ࡚࠸ࡿࠋࡇ࠺ࡋࡓࠕゎ㔘ࡢ⮬⏤ᗘࠖࡢၥ㢟 Ⅼࡣࠊ≉ᐃࡢᇶ‽㛵ࡋ࡚㐩ᡂᗘࡢุ᩿ࡀࠊ ࡣࡗࡁࡾࡋ࡞ࡃ࡞ࡿ࠸࠺ࡇ࡛࠶ࡿࠋࡋ ࡋ࡞ࡀࡽࠊࡇࡢࡼ࠺࡞⮬⏤ᗘࢆᩍ⫱ᶵ㛵 ࠼ࡿࡇࡣ୍ᐃࡢពࡀ࠶ࡾࠊ࠶ࡿỈ‽ࡢ 㐩ᡂᇶ‽ࢆ㉺࠼ࡓࡽࡑࢀ࡛ၥ㢟࡞ࡋࡍࡿࡢ ࡛ࡣ࡞ࡃࠊᖖᨵၿࡢ᪉ྥⓎᒎࡋ࡚࠸ࡃྍ ⬟ᛶࢆṧࡋ࡚࠾ࡃ࠸࠺ࡇ࡛࠶ࡿࠋ 㸵㸬ࡑࡢ ㏆ᖺ࠾ࡅࡿ࣓ࣜ࢝ࡢ⤒῭≧ែࢆཎᅉࡋ࡚ࠊ࣓ࣜ࢝ࡢᏛࡣࡇࡶண⟬ไ⣙ࡢᝏ ┤㠃ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋEU ࡶእ࡛ࡣ࡞࠸ࠊࡑ࠺ࡋࡓ୰࡛Ꮫࢡࣞࢹࢸ࣮ࢩࣙࣥࢆ㐍ࡵ ࡚࠸ࡃࡣࠊ㔠㖹ⓗࡶேⓗ㈨※ࡢᢞධ࠾࠸࡚ࡶࠊࢥࢫࢺ㈇ᢸࡀࡁࡃ࡞ࡗ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ ࢡࣞࢹࢸ࣮ࢩࣙࣥࢆᐇࡍࡿᚲせᛶࠊ㈨㔠ⓗ࣭㛫ⓗ࣭ேⓗ࡞㈇ᢸࡢ㛫ࡢࣂࣛࣥࢫ ࢆ࠸ᅗࡿࡀࠊࡲࡍࡲࡍࡁ࡞ㄢ㢟࡞ࡾࡘࡘ࠶ࡿࠋ ሗ࿌᭩ࡢసᡂ࠾࠸࡚ࡣࠊᢸᙜ⪅ࡢ㈇ᢸࢆ㍍ῶࡋࠊᴗົࢆᨭࡍࡿࡓࡵ ICT ᢏ⾡ࢆ ⏝ࡍࡿࡇࡢ㔜せᛶࡀㄆ㆑ࡉࢀ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ࠼ࡤࠊ࢜ࣥࣛࣥࡢ࢟ࣕࣥࣃࢫホ౯ࢩࢫࢸ࣒ࡢ ୍ࡘࡋ࡚ࠊCompliance Assist ࠸࠺ࢩࢫࢸ࣒ࡢ⏝ࡀ⾜ࢃࢀ࡚࠸ࡿࠋࡲࡓࠊホ౯ᴗົ ᢸᙜ⪅ࡢࢭ࣑ࢼ࣮࡞ࡶ᭷ຠࡔุ᩿ࡉࢀࡿࠋ ᭱ᚋࠊࢡࣞࢹࢸ࣮ࢩࣙࣥಀࡿᴗົࡢຠ⋡ࡘ࠸࡚࠸࠼ࡤࠊᏛᩍဨࡢ⫋ົࡢ ୍ࡘࡋ࡚ࢡࣞࢹࢸ࣮ࢩࣙࣥࢆ⾜࠺ࡇࡶྍḞ࡛࠶ࡿ࠸࠺ㄆ㆑ࢆ㛵ಀ⪅ࡀࡁࡕࢇ ࡶࡘࡼ࠺ࡋࡓୖ࡛ࠊ㐺ษ࡞ࢺ࣮ࣞࢽࣥࢢ࣭ࢩࢫࢸ࣒ࠊࢺ࣮ࣞࢽࣥࢢ࣭ࣉࣟࢢ࣒ࣛ࡞ 121 ࢆ㛤Ⓨࡍࡿࡇࡀ㔜せ࡛࠶ࡿࠋࢡࣞࢹࢸ࣮ࢩࣙࣥᴗົࢆ୍ࡘࡢࢩࢫࢸ࣒ࡋ࡚య⣔ ࡋࠊึࡵࡽ㐺ษ࡞ࢩࢫࢸ࣒ࢆᑟධࡍࡿࡇࡀࠊࡑࡢᚋࡢホ౯ᴗົࢆ࡛ຠᯝⓗ㐍ࡵ ࡿࡓࡵࡢ᭱ࡶ㔜せ࡞せ௳࡛࠶ࡿࠋ 㸦㧗ᶫ ᏹ ᮾிᅜ㝿ᏛᏛ㛗࣭ᩍᤵ㸧 122 Ϫ $JQHV6FKRWW&ROOHJH $JQHV6FRWW&ROOHJH ࠙ゼၥ᪥ࠚᖹᡂ 23(2011)7 ᭶ 13 ᪥ ࠙Ꮫࡢᴫせࠚ ఫᡤ㸸141 East College Avenue. Decatur, Georgia 30030㸭タ⨨ᙧែ㸸⚾❧ࠊ4 ᖺไ㸭 Ꮫ㸸B.A.㸭Ꮫ⏕ᩘ㸸⣙ 900 ே㸭᭱ึ┤㏆ࡢࢡࣞࢹࢸ࣮ࢩࣙࣥ㸦ᶵ㛵࣭ཷᑂᖺ㸧 㸸 SACS㸦1907 ᖺ㸭2004 ᖺ㸧 ࠙㠃ㄯ⪅ࠚ Lea Ann Hudson Ặ࣭࣭࣭Director of the Office of the President, Secretary of the Board James K. Diedrick Ặ࣭࣭࣭Associate Dean of the College, Professor of English ࠙ゼၥㄪᰝဨࠚ ⩚⏣✚⏨㸦᪥ᮏᏛᩥ⌮Ꮫ㒊ᩍᤵ㸧 ࠊ㧗ᶫ ᏹ㸦ᮾிᅜ㝿ᏛᏛ㛗࣭ᩍᤵ㸧 ࠊ ఀ⸨ᩄᘯ㸦ホ౯ᶵᵓホ౯ᴗ㒊㛗㸧 ࠊ㝣 㚝᪳㸦ホ౯ᶵᵓホ౯ᴗ㒊ḟ㛗㸧 ࠙ゼၥㄪᰝࡢᴫせࠚ Agnes Scott College 㸦௨ୗ ASC ࠸࠺㸧ࡣࠊ༡㒊ࡢ㒔ᕷࢺࣛࣥࢱࡢ㑹እ Decatur ࢟ࣕࣥࣃࢫࢆ᧦ࡍࡿᑠつᶍ࣮ࣜ࣋ࣛࣝࢶ࢝ࣞࢵࢪ࡛࠶ࡿࠋᏛ㝔ࡔࡅࢆඹᏛࡋࡓࡇ ࡶ࠶ࡗࡓࡀࠊ⌧ᅾ࡛ࡣዪᏊᏛࡋ࡚Ꮡᅾࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ1889 ᖺ㛗⪁ὴᩍ⣔ࡢ Decatur Female Seminary ࡋ࡚タ❧ࡉࢀࡓࠋ⌧ᅾ࡛ࡣᩍ㣴ᩍ⫱ࡢࣞ࣋ࣝࡢ㧗ࡉ࡛ࡼࡃ▱ࡽࢀ࡚࠸ ࡚Ꮫࣛࣥ࢟ࣥࢢ࡛ࡶ⡿ୖ 60 ᰯࣛࣥࢡࡉࢀ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ 㸯㸬㹁㹁㹐ࡢసᡂ Ꮫࡣࠊ᭱ึࡢࢡࣞࢹࢸ࣮ࢩࣙࣥࢆ 1907 ᖺཷࡅ࡚࠸ࡿࠋࡘࡲࡾ 100 ᖺ௨ୖࡶࡢ ⤒㦂ࢆࡶࡘࠋ┤㏆ࡢࢡࣞࢹࢸ࣮ࢩࣙࣥࡣ 2004 ᖺཷࡅ࡚࠾ࡾࠊḟᅇࡣ 2014 ᖺணᐃ ࡉࢀ࡚࠸ࡿࡢ࡛ࠊࡑࢁࡑࢁࡑࡢ‽ഛධࡿࡇࢁ࡛࠶ࡿࠋ Southern Association of Colleges and Schools㸦༡㒊ᆅ༊ᇶ‽༠ࠊ௨ୗSACS࠸࠺㸧 ࡢࢡࣞࢹࢸ࣮ࢩࣙࣥ㐣⛬ࡣࠊࡲࡎࠊSACSࡢせồ㡯ἢࡗ࡚ࠊホ౯ᇶ‽ࢆࡶ Ꮫࡀ⮬ᕫホ౯ࢆ⾜࠺⤌ࡳ࡞ࡗ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ ASCࡢࡼ࠺ࢡࣞࢹࢸ࣮ࢩࣙࣥࡢ᭦᪂ ࢆồࡵࡿሙྜࡣࠊ⮬ᕫホ౯࡛࠶ࡿCompliance Certification Report㸦ࢥࣥࣉࣛࣥࢫሗ࿌ ᭩ࠊ௨ୗCCR࠸࠺㸧Quality Enhancement Plan㸦㉁ྥୖィ⏬᭩ࠊ௨ୗ QEP࠸࠺㸧ࢆᥦฟࡍࡿࡇ࡞ࡗ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ ࡇࢀࡽࡢ᭩㢮ࢆࡶࠊホ౯ࢳ࣮࣒ࡼࡿ᭩ 㠃ホ౯ࡀ⾜ࢃࢀࠊ᭦ูࡢホ౯ࢳ࣮࣒ࡢᐇᆅ ホ౯ࡶཷࡅࡿࠋホ౯ࢳ࣮࣒ࡢሗ࿌᭩ࢆࡶ 125 ᭱⤊ⓗࡣSACSࡢ⌮ࡼࡗ࡚ㄆᐃࡉࢀࡿ࠺ࠊࡘࡲࡾ᭦᪂ࡍࡿ࠺ࡀỴࡲ ࡿࠋ Ꮫࡢ CCR ࡣࠊCompliance㸦‶ࡓࡋ࡚࠸ࡿ㸧ࡶࡋࡃࡣ Partial- Compliance㸦୍㒊‶ ࡓࡋ࡚࠸ࡿ㸧ࡢ⮬ᕫุᐃࢆ⾜࠸ࠊ᰿ᣐ࡞ࡶ♧ࡉࢀ࡚࠸ࡿࠋࡇࡢ CCR ࡣࠊࢡࣞࢹࢸ ࣮ࢩࣙࣥࢆཷࡅࡿ⣙ 15 ᭶๓ࡣ SACS ᥦฟࡍࡿࡀࠊࡑࡢ㝿ࡣࢇࡢᏛࡀ⮬ ࡽ Compliance ࡢุᐃࢆ⾜࠺ࡢࡀ㏻࡛࠶ࡿࡀࠊࡇࢀᑐࡋࠊSACS ࡢホ౯࡛ࡣࠊPartialCompliance ࡢุᐃࡶぢࡽࢀࡿࠋ ASC ࡣࠊ2004 ᖺࡢ 5 ᖺᚋࡢ⮬ᕫホ౯ࡢẁ㝵࡛ࡣࠊ⮬ࡽ Compliance ࡢุᐃࢆ⾜ࡗ࡚࠸ ࡿࠋPartial-Compliance ࡞ࡾᚓࡿ㡯┠ࡶ⮬ぬࡉࢀࡓࡀࠊࡇࢀ㛵ࡋ࡚ࡣ 1 ᖺ๓ࡽ ၥ㢟ࡢゎỴྲྀ⤌ࡳࠊၥ㢟࡞࠸ド࡛᫂ࡁࡿ༑ศ࡞࢚ࣅࢹࣥࢫࢆࡑࢁ࠼࡚࠸ࡿࠋ ࡲࡓࠊSACS ࡢࢩࢫࢸ࣒ࡢᨵゞࡼࡾࠊせồ㡯ࡢኚ᭦ࡶ࠶ࡗࡓࠋ௨๓ࡣࠊ୍ᗘㄆᐃࡉ ࢀࡓ CCR 㛵ࡋࠊ࢚ࣅࢹࣥࢫࢆࡧฟࡍᚲせࡣ࡞ࡗࡓࡀࠊ᭱㏆࡛ࡣࢡࣞࢹࢸ࣮ࢩ ࣙࣥࢆ⾜࠺ࠊ๓ᅇࡢ࢚ࣅࢹࣥࢫࡢᗘࡢᥦ♧ࡀせồࡉࢀࡿሙྜࡀ࠶ࡾࠊ࡞࠾ࡘࡑࡢ ࢚ࣅࢹࣥࢫࢆㄆࡵ࡞࠸࠸࠺ࡶ࠶ࡿ࠸࠺ࠋ ASC ࡢ CCR ࡢసᡂࡣᏛ㛗ࡀᢸᙜࡍࡿࡀࠊ᭱ึࡣᏛࡢྛ㒊㛛ࡀࢹ࣮ࢱࡢ㞟ࢆࡋ࡞ࡅ ࢀࡤ࡞ࡽ࡞࠸ࡢ࡛ࠊᏛయࡢࢥ࣮ࢹࢿ࣮ࢩࣙࣥࢆ࠺ࡲࡃࡍࡿࡇࡀ㠀ᖖ㔜せ࡛࠶ࡿࠋ Ꮫ㛗ࢆࢺࢵࣉ࠾࠸࡚ࠊࢩࢽࡢࢫࢱࢵࣇࡀࢳ࣮࣒ࢆ⤌ࢇ࡛ࠊᏛෆࡢࢫࢱࢵࣇᑐࡋ࡚ ㈐௵ࢆࡶࡗ࡚ࢹ࣮ࢱࢆ㞟ࡉࡏࡿᚲせࡀ࠶ࡿࠋ㠀ᖖ㛫ࡀࡿసᴗࡀ࠶ࡿࡀࠊSACS ࡀせồࡍࡿ㈨ᩱ࡞ࢆ☜ᐇ⏝ពࡍࡿᚲせࡀ࠶ࡿࠋ ḟ㞟ࡵࡓࢹ࣮ࢱ࡞ࢆࡢࡼ࠺ᩚ⌮ࡋࠊ࢚ࣅࢹࣥࢫࡋ࡚ࡲࡵࠊ᭱⤊ⓗ CCR ࢆసᡂࡍࡿࡢࡶኚ࡞㦵ᢡࢀసᴗ࡛࠶ࡿࠋASC ࡛ࡣࠊࡇࢀࡽࢹ࣮ࢱࢆฎ⌮࣭ศᯒࡍࡿ ࡓࡵࡢࢯࣇࢺ࢙࢘ࢆ㉎ධࡍࡿࡇࢆ᳨ウࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ ASC ࡛ࡣࠊ࢚ࣅࢹࣥࢫࡢῧ㈨ᩱࡋ࡚㡯┠ࡢᑠࢆၥࢃࡎ⣙ 300 ࡢࢻ࣓࢟ࣗࣥࢺࢆ⏝ ពࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋSACS ࡛ࡣࠊ᭱⤊ⓗ᭦᪂ࡢㄆᐃࢆࡍࡿࡓࡵࡣ⣙ 100 ࡢࢻ࣓࢟ࣗࣥࢺࢆせ ồࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࡀࠊ ෆᐜࡋ࡚ࡣ 1 ࡘࡢࢻ࣓࢟ࣗࣥࢺࡀᑠࡉ࡞ࣃࣛࢢࣛࣇ⛬ᗘࡢࡶࡢࡶ࠶ࢀࡤࠊ 5㹼6 ࣮࣌ࢪ࡞ࡿࡶࡢࡶ࠶ࡿࠋ 㸰㸬㹏㹃㹎ࡢసᡂ ㉁ࡢྥୖࡢࡓࡵࡢ QEP ࡣࠊᏛࡀࢡࣞࢹࢸ࣮ࢩࣙࣥࢆ⥅⥆ࡋࡼ࠺ࡍࡿ㝿ࡣᚲ ࡎ‽ഛࡋ࡞ࡅࢀࡤ࡞ࡽ࡞࠸ࡶࡢ࡛࠶ࡾࠊᐇᆅホ౯ࡢ 4㹼6 㐌㛫๓ࡣ SACS ᥦฟࡋ࡞ࡅ ࢀࡤ࡞ࡽ࡞࠸ࠋ SACS ࡛ࡣ 5 ᖺ 1 ᅇ QEP ࢆせồࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋࡘࡲࡾㄆᐃᮇ㛫ࡢ 10 ᖺ㛫ࡢ୰㛫ࡢᮇ ᐇࡉࢀࡿࠋ๓ᅇ QEP ࢆసᡂࡋࡓࡣࠊホ౯ᢸᙜࡢᏛ㛗ཬࡧᩍᤵ㝕ࡀཧຍࡋࡓጤဨ ࡛ᢸᙜࡋࡓࡀࠊᏛࡀᥖࡆࡓ┠ᶆࡀ㠀ᖖᗈ⠊࡛࠶ࡾࠊከᒱΏࡗ࡚࠸ࡓࠋࡇࡢⅬࡣᑡࡋ ┬ࡋ࡚ࠊᅇࡢ QEP ࡢᢸᙜ㒊⨫ࡣࠊᏛ㒊㛗ࡢົ㒊㛛ࢆ୰ᚰࠊࡶࡗලయⓗ࡞┠ᶆ ࢆタᐃࡋ࡚࠸ࡿ࠸࠺ࠋ ASC ࡣࠊᏛ⏕ࡢ▱㆑ࡢ⩦ᚓࡘ࠸࡚㠀ᖖᗈ⠊࡞ࣁࣞ࣋ࣝࡢ┠ᶆࢆタᐃࡋࡓࡓࡵࠊ≉ ᐃࡢ┠ᶆ್ࢆᥖࡆ࡚ẖᖺᐇࡋࡓࠋࡇࢀࢆ QEP ࡋ࡚ᥦฟࡋࡓࠊ1 ᖺ┠ 3 ᖺ┠ 㛵ࡋ࡚ࡣ㠀ᖖࡁ࡞ᡂᯝࢆᚓࡓࡀࠊ2 ᖺ┠ 4 ᖺ┠ࡣࡑࢀ࡛ࡶ࡞ࡗࡓ⮬ᕫホ౯ ࡋࡓࡇᑐࡋࠊSACS ഃࡽࡣ㠀ᖖࡼ࠸ホ౯άືࢆࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠊᖜᗈࡃࣁࣞ࣋ࣝࡢ 126 ┠ᶆࢆᥖࡆ࡚άືࡋ࡚࠸ࡿㄆࡵ࡚࠸ࡓࡔ࠸ࡓࠋ 㸱㸬Ꮫಟᡂᯝ࡞ࡢホ౯ Ꮫ⏕ࡢ Learning Outcomes㸦Ꮫಟᡂᯝ㸧㛵ࡋ࡚ࡣࠊNational Survey of Student Engagement㸦௨ୗ NSSE ࠸࠺㸧ࢆࡗ࡚ホ౯ࢆࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋASC ࡀ QEP ࢆసᡂࡋࡓ ࡣࠊNSSE ࡢ⤖ᯝࢆ࣋ࣥࢳ࣐࣮ࢡࡋ࡚ࠊࡇࢀᑐࡋ࡚ ASC ഃࡀࢀࡔࡅ㏆࡙ࡅࡿࠊ ࠶ࡿ࠸ࡣ㉸࠼࡚࠸ࡅࡿࡢࢩ࣑࣮ࣗࣞࢩࣙࣥࢆ⾜ࡗࡓࠋ≉ࠊ୰➼ᩍ⫱ࡽ㧗➼ᩍ⫱ࡢ ㌿ᮇࡢ 1 ᖺḟ⏕ࡢホ౯ࡀ㠀ᖖษ࡛࠶ࡿࠋ NSSE ࡣ⏝ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࡀࠊCollegiate Learning Assessment㸦௨ୗ CLA ࠸࠺㸧ࡣ ࡗ࡚࠸࡞࠸ࠋCLA ࡣ㠀ᖖࢥࢫࢺࡀ㧗࠸ࡓࡵࠊASC ࡢࡼ࠺࡞ᑠつᶍᏛࡗ࡚ࡣၥ㢟 ࡛࠶ࡿࠋ᭦ CLA ࡢၥ㢟Ⅼࡋ࡚ࠊᏛ⏕ᑐࡋ࡚ࡢ㛫ⓗ࡞㈇ᢸࡀࡁ㐣ࡂࡿࡇ࡛࠶ ࡿࠋࡋࡋ㏆㞄ࡢᑠつᶍᏛ࡛ࡶ CLA ࢆᐇࡋ࡚࠸ࡿᏛࡶ࠶ࡾࠊᜍࡽࡃᨻᗓࡽࡢ⿵ ຓ㔠࡞ࡀ࠶ࡗࡓࡢ࡛ࡣ࡞࠸ ASC ࡣ᥎ ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ ASC ࡛ࡣ 4 ᖺ⏕ࡢᏛ⏕ᑐࡋ࡚ẖᖺࠊᏛಟᡂᯝࡢホ౯ࢆᐇࡋࡓୖࠊᏛయࡢ⮬ᕫホ ౯ሗ࿌᭩ࢆࡲࡵࠊᚋࡢィ⏬᭩࡞ࡶసᡂࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋࡇࡢ⮬ᕫホ౯ࡣ 7 ᖺࡈᐇࡋ ࡚࠸ࡿࠋᏛࡢ࣑ࢵࢩࣙࣥࡣఱ࡛࠶ࡿࠊᑗ᮶ࡢィ⏬ࡣ࠺࡛࠶ࡿࠊ࠸ࡗࡓࡇࢆྵ ࡵࡓᏛయࡢ⮬ᕫホ౯ࢆ⾜࠺ࡢ࡛࠶ࡿࠋ 7 ᖺࡈࡢᏛෆࡢ⮬ᕫホ౯ሗ࿌᭩ 5 ᖺࡈᥦฟࡍࡿ QEP ࡣࠊᚲࡎࡋࡶ㛵㐃࡙ࡅࡽ ࢀ࡚ࡣ࠸࡞࠸ࠋ 7 ᖺࡈࡢ⮬ᕫホ౯ሗ࿌᭩ࡣᏛ㛗ᐊࡀᢸᙜࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࡀࠊ5 ᖺࡈࡢ QEP ࡣࠊ Ꮫ㒊㛗ࡢົ㒊㛛ࡀᢸᙜࡋࠊSACS ࡢせồ㡯ࠊ≉㐃㑥ᨻᗓ㛵㐃ࡢせồ㡯ࢆ‶ࡓ ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿ࠺㔜ࡁࡀ⨨ࢀ࡚࠸ࡿࠋࡶࡕࢁࢇ QEP ࡢ୍㒊ࡀ 7 ᖺࡈࡢ⮬ᕫホ౯ሗ ࿌᭩⤌㎸ࡲࢀࡿࡇࡶ࠶ࡿࠋ⮬ᕫホ౯ሗ࿌᭩ࡣࠊ᭱⤊ⓗࡣ 10 ᖺࢧࢡࣝࡢࢡࣞࢹ ࢸ࣮ࢩࣙࣥࡢࡓࡵࡢ CCR ࡢࡁ࡞㒊ศࢆᵓᡂࡍࡿࡇ࡞ࡿࠋ 10 ᖺࡃࡽ࠸๓ࡲ࡛ࡣࠊSACS ࡢࢡࣞࢹࢸ࣮ࢩࣙࣥᑐࡋࠊ༞ᴗ⏕ࡢࣜࢫࢺࡸ GPA ࢫࢥࠊ࠶ࡿ࠸ࡣᏛ㝔㐍ᏛࡍࡿᏛ⏕ࡢࣜࢫࢺ࡞ࢆ࢚ࣅࢹࣥࢫࡋ࡚ᥦฟࡍࢀࡤࡼ ࡗࡓࡀࠊࡑࡢᚋࠊSACS ࡽࡣᏛ⏕ࡢᏛಟᡂᯝ㛵ࡍࡿホ౯ࡶࡗ↔Ⅼࢆᙜ࡚ࡓ CCR ࢆせồࡋ࡚ࡁ࡚࠸ࡿࡢ࡛ࠊ࢚ࣅࢹࣥࢫࡋ࡚ 7 ᖺࡈࡢ⮬ᕫホ౯ሗ࿌᭩ࡣ㠀ᖖ㔜せ࡞ࡶ ࡢ࡞ࡗ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ ᭱㏆ࠊASC ࡢ IR 㒊㛛(Institutional Researchࠊ௨ୗ IR ᐊ࠸࠺㸧࡛ࡣࠊṔྐࠊᩘᏛࠊ ⏕≀ࡢ 3 ࡘࡢ㒊㛛࡛ NSSE ࢆᐇࡋࡓ⤖ᯝᑐࡋ࡚ㄪᰝࢆ⾜࠺ࡇ࡞ࡗ࡚࠸ࡿࠋࡇࡢㄪ ᰝࢆᐇࡍࡿ࠶ࡓࡗ࡚ࡣࠊ㐣ཤ 3 ᖺ㛫ࡢ⤖ᯝࢆࡲࡵࠊࡇࢀࢆᅜ࠶ࡿ࠸ࡣ㑅ᢥࡉࢀࡓ ⚾❧ࡢつᶍᏛࡢ⤖ᯝẚ㍑ࡋ࡚ࠊASC ࡀࡢ⛬ᗘࡢࣞ࣋ࣝ࠶ࡿ࠸࠺⤖ᯝࢆฟࡍ ࡇ࡞ࡗ࡚࠸ࡿࠋIR ᐊࡣࡦࡾࡢࢫࢱࢵࣇࡔࡅࡀ࠾ࡾࠊࡉࡲࡊࡲ࡞ࢹ࣮ࢱ㞟ࡸศᯒ ࡞ᖜᗈࡃᴗົࢆᇳࡾ⾜ࡗ࡚࠸ࡿࡀࠊホ౯ 㛵ࡋ࡚ࡣࡁࡃ㈉⊩ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋIR ᐊࡣᜏᖖⓗ ࡞⤌⧊ࡋ࡚タࡅ࡚࠸ࡿࡀࠊSACS ࡢホ౯ࢆ ཷࡅࡿࡓࡵࡢ≉ูࡢ⤌⧊ࢆసࡽࡎࠊᐇᆅホ ౯࡞࡛ከࡃࡢࢫࢱࢵࣇࡢᑐᛂࡀᚲせ࡞ሙྜ ࡣࢧ࣏࣮ࢺࢫࢱࢵࣇࠊ≉ IT 㛵ಀࡢࢫࢱࢵ ࣇࢆቑࡸࡋ࡚ᑐᛂࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ ᭦ࠊᏛ⏕ࡢ⏕άᑐࡍࡿホ౯ࡶ᭱㏆࡛ࡣ 127 ຊࢆධࢀࡿࡼ࠺࡞ࡗࡓࠋࡇࢀࡣ IR ᐊࡀ UCLA ࡢ HERI(Higher Education Research Institute)ࡀ㛤Ⓨࡋࡓ CIRP(Cooperative Institute or Research Program)࠸࠺Ꮫ⏕ㄪᰝ ࡢࣉࣟࢢ࣒ࣛࢆࡗ࡚ࠊ1 ᖺḟ⏕ 4 ᖺḟ⏕ࢆᑐ㇟ࠊ⏕άࢫࢱࣝࠊᐙ᪘ࠊ᐀ᩍࠊ♫ 㠃ཬࡧᨻ㠃࡞ࡢ≧ἣࡢㄪᰝࢆ⾜࠸ࠊᏛ⏕ࡋ࡚ࡢࡼ࠺࢟ࣕࣥࣃࢫ⏕άࢆ㏦ࡗ࡚࠸ ࡿࡢホ౯ࢆࡲࡵ࡚࠸ࡿࠋࡇࡢࡼ࠺ IR ᐊࡣᏛ⏕ࡢホ౯ᑐࡋ࡚ࡶࡁࡃ㈉⊩ࡋ࡚࠸ ࡿࠋ 㸲㸬ḟᅇࡢࢡࣞࢹࢸ࣮ࢩࣙࣥྥࡅ࡚ ḟᅇࡢ CCR ࡣࠊᏛෆࡢ⤒㦂⪅ࡽࡢࡉࡲࡊࡲ࡞ሗࡸ༠ຊࢆࡶࡲࡵࡿࡇ࡞ ࡿࠋ᭩㠃ホ౯ࢆᢸᙜࡍࡿホ౯ဨࡢ┠⥺ࡽࠊ࢚ࣅࢹࣥࢫࡢ࣮࣒࣎ࣜࣗ࡞యࡢࣂࣛࣥࢫ ࢆ຺ࡋ࡚‽ഛࡍࡿᚲせࡀ࠶ࡿࠋSACS ࡣ CCR ࡢసᡂ㛵ࡍࡿ࣮࣡ࢡࢩࣙࢵࣉࢆࠊẖᖺࠊ ྛᆅ࡛㛤ദࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋࡑࡢ࡞࡛ᩍ⫱ࡢ㉁ࢆྥୖࡉࡏࠊPartial-Compliance ࢆ Compliance ኚ࠼ࡿࡓࡵࡢ᪉⟇࡞ࡢㄝ᫂ࢆ⾜ࡗ࡚࠸ࡿࠋࡇࡢࡇࡣᏛࡗ࡚ࡣㄔ᭷ព⩏࡛࠶ ࡿࠋ ࡲࡓࠊCompliance 㛵ࡋ࡚ࠊᏛࡀ Compliance ࡛࠶ࡿ⮬ᕫホ౯ࢆࡋ࡚ࡶࠊSACS ࡣ Partial-Compliance ホ౯ࡉࢀ࡚ࡋࡲ࠺ࡇࡶ࠶ࡿࠋᏛࡀࡑࡢ⤖ᯝࢆ⣡ᚓࡋ࡚ᨵၿ ࡛ࡁࢀࡤࡼ࠸ࡀࠊࡑ࠺࡛࡞࠸ሙྜࢆ࠺ࡍࡿࡢࡀၥ㢟࡛࠶ࡿࠋࡑࡢሙྜ PartialCompliance ࡞ࡗࡓせᅉࡘ࠸࡚ SACS ࡽㄝ᫂ࡀồࡵࡽࢀࡿࠋASC ࡢሙྜࡣࠊ᭩㠃ホ ౯㈈ົୖᚲせ࡞᭩㢮ၥ㢟ࡀ࠶ࡗࡓࠋᚲせ࡞᭩㢮ࡢᥦฟᮇ㝈ࡀ 8 ᭶࡛࠶ࡗࡓࡀࠊྠᖺ ࡢ 6 ᭶ 30 ᪥ࡀᏛࡢィᖺᗘࡢ⤊ࡾ࡛࠶ࡿࡓࡵࠊ㈈ົ㛵ࡍࡿ᭩㢮ࡀฟ᮶ୖࡀࡿࡢࡣ 9 ᭶ 10 ᭶ࡀ㏻ᖖ࡛࠶ࡿࠋࡑࡢࡓࡵ 8 ᭶࡛ࡣ᭩㢮ࡢᥦฟࡀྍ⬟࡞ࡗࡓࠋࡇࡢⅬ㛵ࡋ SACS ࡽᣦࢆཷࡅࡓࡇࡀ࠶ࡗࡓࡢ࡛࠶ࡿࠋࡇࡢሙྜࡣࠊࡶ࠺୍ᗘࢳࣕࣥࢫࡀ࠼ ࡽࢀࡿ࠸࠺ࡇ࡛ࠊ᭩㠃ホ౯࡛ᣦࡉࢀࡓၥ㢟Ⅼࡢᨵၿ⟇ࡋ࡚ Focused Report ࢆస ᡂࡋࠊࡑࡢ࡞࡛㏙ࡽࢀࡓᨵၿ⟇ࡀᐇ㝿ᐇࡉࢀ࡚࠸ࡿ࠺ࢆࡑࡢᚋࡢᐇᆅホ౯ ࡛☜ㄆࡉࢀࡿࠋࡇࡢࡼ࠺ SACS ࡢࣇ࢛࣮ࣟࢵࣉ᪉⟇ࡋ࡚ホ౯ᮇ㛫୰ᨵၿࢆಁࡍࡇ ࡶ࠶ࡿࠋࡋࡋࠊSACS ࡢホ౯ᇶ‽㛵ࡋ࡚ࡣࠊࡦࡘ࡛ࡶ‶ࡓࡋ࡚࠸࡞࠸㡯ࡀ࠶ࢀ ࡤࠊ༶ࠊࣉࣟ࣋ࢪࣙࣥࡀ࠼ࡽࢀ࡚ࡋࡲ࠺ࠋ ⡿ᅜ࡛ࡣࠊ≉ᑠつᶍࡢேᩥ⛉Ꮫ⣔ࡢᏛࡀᏛ⏕ເ㞟ࡸ⤒῭ⓗ࡞⌮⏤ࡼࡾࠊࡑࡢᏑ⥆ ࡀ㞴ࡋࡃ࡞ࡗ࡚࠸ࡿࠋࡑࡢ࡞࡛ ASC ࡣዪᏊᏛࡋ࡚ࡢ࣓ࣜࢵࢺࢆᏛ⏕࡞ఏ࠼ࡿ ࡇࡀ㔜せ࡛࠶ࡿ⪃࠼࡚࠸ࡿࠋ࠼ࡤࠊධᏛࡽ༞ᴗࡲ࡛ࡢ㛫ࠊ࠸ከࡃࡢ▱㆑ࢆ ᚓࡿࡇࡀ࡛ࡁࡿࠊ࠶ࡿ࠸ࡣዪᏊᏛࢆ༞ᴗࡋࡓࡇ࡛⫋ᴗࢆぢࡘࡅࡿࢳࣕࣥࢫࡀቑ ࠼ࡿࠊࡘⰋ࠸⫋ᴗᑵࡅࡿྍ⬟ᛶࡀ㧗࠸ࡇ࡞ࢆᐉఏࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ ASC ࡢ࢟ࣕࣥࣃࢫࡣᐇ⨾ࡋ࠸ࡀࠊ୍᪉࡛ࡣࠊከࡃࡢᘓ≀ࡀྂࡃᨵಟࡀᚲせ࡛࠶ࡿࠋ࢟ ࣕࣥࣃࢫࡢ⎔ቃ⥔ᣢ࡞ࡾࡢຊࢆධࢀ࡞ࡃ࡚ࡣ࡞ࡽ࡞࠸ࠋ༞ᴗ⏕ࡢᐤ⋡ࡣண⟬ࡢ 50㸣 ⛬ᗘ࡛࠶ࡾࠊࢥ࢝ࢥ࣮ࣛࡢ࢘ࢵࢻࣛࣇ㈈ᅋࡽࡢᐤ㝃ࡶ࠶ࡿࡀࠊ㈈ᨻⓗᏳᐃࢆࡉࡏࡿࡓ ࡵࡣᐤ㔠㞟ࡵࡶࡗຊࢆධࢀࠊᨭࡢࣂࣛࣥࢫࢆᅗࡿࡇࡀㄢ㢟࡛࠶ࡿࠋ 䠄⩚⏣✚⏨㻌 ᪥ᮏᏛᩥ⌮Ꮫ㒊ᩍᤵ䠅 128 ϫ *HRUJLD,QVWLWXWHRI7HFKQRORJ\ *HRUJLD,QVWLWXWHRI7HFKQRORJ\ ࠙ゼၥ᪥ࠚᖹᡂ 23(2011)ᖺ 7 ᭶ 14 ᪥ ࠙Ꮫࡢᴫせࠚ ఫᡤ㸸Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332㸭タ⨨ᙧែ㸸ᕞ❧ࠊ4 ᖺไ㸭Ꮫ㸸B.M.D㸭Ꮫ⏕ᩘ㸸⣙ 20,000 ே㸭᭱ึ┤㏆ࡢࢡࣞࢹࢸ࣮ࢩࣙࣥ㸦ᶵ 㛵࣭ཷᑂᖺ㸧㸸SACS㸦1923 ᖺ㸭2005 ᖺ㸧 ࠙㠃ㄯ⪅ࠚ Jack R. Lohmann Ặ࣭࣭࣭Vice Provost and Professor Susan E. Paraska Ặ࣭࣭࣭Director, Program Review and Accreditation Caroline R. Noyes Ặ࣭࣭࣭Assistant Director, Office of Assessment ࠙ゼၥㄪᰝဨࠚ ⩚⏣✚⏨㸦᪥ᮏᏛᩥ⌮Ꮫ㒊ᩍᤵ㸧 ࠊ㧗ᶫ ᏹ㸦ᮾிᅜ㝿Ꮫ㛗࣭ᩍᤵ㸧ࠊ ఀ⸨ᩄᘯ㸦ホ౯ᶵᵓホ౯ᴗ㒊㛗㸧 ࠊ㝣 㚝᪳㸦ホ౯ᶵᵓホ౯ᴗ㒊ḟ㛗㸧 ࠙ゼၥㄪᰝࡢᴫせࠚ Georgia Institute of Technology㸦㏻⛠ࢪ࣮ࣙࢪࢸࢵࢡࠊ௨ୗ GIT ࠸࠺㸧ࡣࠊ༡㒊 ࡢ㒔ᕷࢺࣛࣥࢱࡢࡰ୰ᚰ㒊࢟ࣕࣥࣃࢫࢆ᧦ࡍࡿつᶍ࡞ᕤ⛉Ꮫ࡛࠶ࡿࠋ1885 ᖺࡢタ࡛༡㒊࡛ࡣྂ࠸Ṕྐࢆࡿᕤ⛉Ꮫ࡛࠶ࡿࠋྛ✀ࡢᏛࣛࣥ࢟ࣥࢢ࡛ࡣࠊᖖ⥲ ྜᏛ㒊㛛ࡢୖᰯ࡛࠶ࡾࡑࡢඃ⚽ᛶࡣ༡㒊࡛ࡣࡶࡕࢁࢇ⡿࡛ࡶࡼࡃ▱ࡽࢀ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ 㸯㸬⮬ᕫホ౯ࡢయไ Ꮫࡋ࡚᭱ึࡢࢡࣞࢹࢸ࣮ࢩࣙࣥࢆཷࡅࡓࡢࡣࠊ1923 ᖺ࡛࠶ࡿࠋ90 ᖺ㏆࠸ࢡ ࣞࢹࢸ࣮ࢩࣙࣥࡢṔྐࢆ้ࢇ࡛ࡁࡓࠋ Southern Association of Colleges and Schools㸦༡㒊ᆅ༊ᇶ‽༠ࠊ௨ୗ SACS ࠸࠺㸧 ࡼࡿ᭱㏆ࡢࢡࣞࢹࢸ࣮ࢩࣙࣥࡣ 2005 ᖺ࡛࠶ࡾࠊ2015 ᖺḟᅇࡢ᭦᪂ࡀணᐃࡉࢀ࡚ ࠸ࡿࠋㄆᐃᮇ㛫ࡢ 10 ᖺࡢ㛫 5 ᖺ┠ࡢ 2011 ᖺ 3 ᭶୰㛫ሗ࿌ࢆᥦฟࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ2011 ᖺ 7 ᭶ࡢᡃࠎࡢゼၥㄪᰝࡣࠊᗘ Compliance Certification Report㸦ࢥࣥࣉࣛࣥࢫሗ࿌ ᭩ࠊ௨ୗ CCR ࠸࠺㸧 Quality Enhancement Plan㸦㉁ྥୖィ⏬᭩ࠊ௨ୗ QEP ࠸࠺㸧ࢆᥦฟࡋࡓࡇࢁ࡛࠶ࡗࡓࡢ࡛ࠊ ࡼ࠸ࢱ࣑ࣥࢢ࡛࠶ࡗࡓࠋ GIT ࡢࢡࣞࢹࢸ࣮ࢩࣙࣥࡢ㈐௵⪅ࡢ Jack R. Lohmann ẶࡣࠊࡇࡢᏛࢆ௦⾲ࡋ࡚ SACS ࡢ࢚ࣜࢰࣥᙺࢆᯝࡓࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋྠ SACS ࡢ Trustee Board㸦⌮㸧ࡢ࣓ࣥ 131 ࣂ࣮ࡶ࡞ࡗ࡚࠸ࡿࠋᏛࡢ௦⾲⪅࡛࠶ࡿྠ SACS ࡢ௦⾲⪅ࡢࡦࡾ࡛ࡶ࠶ࡿࠋࡶ ࡋᏛ SACS ࡢ㛫࡛ࠊホ౯ୖࡢពぢ࡛┦㐪ࡀ࠶ࡗࡓሙྜࡣࠊ୧᪉ࡢ❧ሙ࡛ពぢࢆ㏙ ࡿࡇ࡞ࡗ࡚࠸ࡿ࠸࠺ࠋSACS 㛵ಀࡢ࡛ࡣࠊ25 ᖺࡢᐇ⦼ࢆࡶࡘ࣋ࢸࣛࣥᏛ ே࡛࠶ࡿࠋ ࢡࣞࢹࢸ࣮ࢩࣙࣥࡢ㐣⛬㛵ࡋ࡚ࡣࠊࡲࡎ SACS ࡽࡢせồ㡯ࡀᐇ㝿Ꮫෆࡢྛ Ꮫ㒊࡛ᐇ⾜ࡉࢀ࡚࠸ࡿ࠺ࢆ⮬ᕫホ౯ࡋࠊྛᏛ㒊㛗ࡀࡑࡢ⤖ᯝࢆࡲࡵࠊᏛࡢୖ㒊 ᶵ㛵࡛࠶ࡿ Board Relations㸦⌮㛵ಀᒁ㸧ࡢ☜ㄆࢆྲྀࡾࠊ᭱⤊ⓗ SACS ᥦฟࡍࡿ ࠸࠺ὶࢀ࡞ࡗ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ SACS ࡽࡣࠊ⌮ࡸᏛ㛗ࡢ㑅௵ࠊᩍᤵ㝕ࡢ㞠⏝ࡢࠊࣉࣟࢢ࣒ࣛࡸタタഛᑐࡋ ࡚ࡶከࡃࡢせồ㡯ࡀ࠶ࡿࠋ ≉ facility㸦タタഛ㸧ᑐࡍࡿ SACS ࡢせồ㡯ࡣࠊከᒱࢃࡓࡿෆᐜ࡛つᶍ Ꮫ࡛ࡣᑐᛂࡀኚ࡛࠶ࡿࠋ࠼ࡤࠊᏛ⏕ࡀ࠺◊✲ᐊࡘ࠸࡚ࠊ≉Ṧ࡞⨨ࡸタഛ࡞◊ ✲ࡋࡼ࠺࠸࠺ෆᐜᛂࡌࡓ⎔ቃࡀᚲせ࡞ࡿࠋࡲࡓࠊᏛ⏕ࡸᩍဨࡀᏛ࡛༑ศᏛၥ ᑓᛕ࡛ࡁࡿࡼ࠺ࠊᏛಟ⎔ቃࡸປാ⎔ቃ࡞ࡢᩚഛࡶᚲせ࡛࠶ࡿࠋᩍ⫱ࡢ┠ⓗࢆ㐩ᡂࡍࡿ ࡓࡵࡣࡉࡲࡊࡲ࡞⎔ቃࢆᩚഛࡋ࡞ࡅࢀࡤ࡞ࡽ࡞࠸ࠋࡑࢀࡀ࡚ facility ࠸࠺ゝⴥ࡛ゝ ࠸⾲ࡉࢀ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ SACS ࡽࡢࡉࡲࡊࡲ࡞せồ㡯ᑐࡋࠊGIT ࡣࡑࡢࡓࡵࡢ㒊㛛ࢆタ⨨ࡍࡿࡇࡣࡋ࡞ ࠸ࠋ࡞ࡐ࡞ࡽࠊᏛ⏕ࡢせồ࡞ࢆ‶㊊ࡉࡏࡿࡇࡀ࡛ࡁࡿ࠺ࡘ࠸࡚ᖖࣔࢽࢱ࣮ ࢆࡋ࡚࠸࡚ࠊ⥅⥆ⓗ㉁ࡢྥୖࢆᅗࢁ࠺ດຊࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࡽ࡛࠶ࡿࠋSACS ࡢせồ㡯 ᑐࡋ࡚༢ᐇ⌧ࡋࡼ࠺࠸࠺ጼໃ࡛ࡣ࡞ࡃࠊSACS ࡢせồ㡯ࢆྵࡵࠊᏛ⊂⮬ࡢᇶ‽ࢆ タࡅࠊᏛ≉᭷ࡢㅖάື㛵ࡍࡿ⮬ᕫホ౯ࢆ⾜ࡗ࡚࠸ࡿࠋせࡍࡿࠊᏛ⮬㌟ࡀᇶ‽ࢆタ ᐃࡋࠊࡇࢀࢆᡂຌᑟ࠸࡚࠸ࡃࡇࡀ㔜せ⪃࠼࡚࠸ࡿࡢ࡛࠶ࡿࠋ ࡶ࠺ࡦࡘ㔜せ࡞ⅬࡣࠊSACS ࡢせồ㡯ࡘ࠸࡚ࡣࠊఱࡶᏛ㛵ಀࡢ࡞࠸ู⤌⧊ ࡽᏛᑐࡋ࡚せồࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࢃࡅ࡛ࡣ࡞ࡃࠊせồ㡯ࡣ࡚Ꮫ㛵ಀ⪅࡞ࡀసᡂࡋ࡚࠸ ࡿࡢ࡛࠶ࡿࠋせồ㡯ࡣࠊࡘࡲࡾ᪤ࡑࢀࡒࢀࡢᏛ࡛ᐇࡋ࡚࠸ࡿάື≧ἣࢆ㋃ࡲ࠼ࡓ ෆᐜ࡛࠶ࡾᩚྜᛶࡀᅗࡽࢀ࡚࠸ࡿࡢ࡛࠶ࡿࠋ 㸰㸬ホ౯ᐊࡢᙺ Office of Assessment㸦௨ୗホ౯ᐊ࠸࠺㸧࡛ࡣࠊᏛෆ࡛ᐇࡉࢀ࡚࠸ࡿྛ✀ࣉࣟࢢ࣒ࣛ ࡞ࡢሗࢆ㞟ࡵࠊSACS ࡽࡢせồ㡯㛵ࡍࡿෆᐜࢆᖺ 2 ᅇࠊሗ࿌᭩ࡢᙧ࡛ࡲࡵ ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ᭦ࠊᩍ⫱ෆᐜࠊ༞ᴗ⏕ཬࡧᅾ⡠Ꮫ⏕࡞㛵ࡍࡿᏛయࡢࡉࡲࡊࡲ࡞ㄪᰝࡶ ⾜ࡗ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ GIT ࡛ࡣࠊᏛෆࡢホ౯యไࡘࡢ࢜ࣇࢫࡀ࠶ࡿࠋIR (Institutional Research) ࢆᢸ ᙜࡍࡿົᐊ㸦௨ୗ IR ᐊ࠸࠺㸧ホ౯ᐊ࡛࠶ࡿࠋࡢᏛ࡛ࡣ㏻ᖖࡦࡘࡢ࢜ࣇ ࢫࡀ୧᪉ࡢᴗົࢆ⾜ࡗ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ ホ౯ᐊ࡛ࡣࠊᏛ⏕ࡢᏛಟᡂᯝ(Learning Outcomes)㔜Ⅼ ࢆ⨨࠸ࡓሗ࡞ࢆ㞟࣭ศᯒࡍࡿࠋIR ᐊ࡛ࡣࠊᏛ⏕ࡢධᏛࠊࣜࢸࣥࢩࣙࣥ⋡࡞㛵ࡍ ࡿሗ㞟ศᯒࢆ⾜ࡗ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ࡞ࡐࠊIR ᐊホ౯ᐊࡢ୧㒊㛛ࡀ࡛ࡁࡓࡢࠋࡑࢀࡣࠊ10 ᖺ๓ SACS ࡢࢡࣞࢹࢸ࣮ࢩࣙࣥ᭦᪂ࢆཷࡅࡓࠊ≉Ꮫ⏕ࡢᏛಟᡂᯝ࡞ࡢホ ౯ࡀ࠶ࡲࡾࡼࡃ࡞ࡗࡓ࠸࠺⤒㦂ࡀ࠶ࡗࡓࡓࡵ࡛࠶ࡿࠋ 1990 ᖺ௦௨๓࡛ࡣࠊࡓࡔ㇋ࢆᩘ࠼ࡿࡼ࠺࡞ࡶࡢࠊࡘࡲࡾఱ㛫ㅮ⩏ࢆ⾜࠸ࠊᏛ⏕ࡢ༞ᴗ 132 ⋡ࡣࡢࡃࡽ࠸ࠊ࠸࠺ࡼ࠺࡞⤖ᯝࡢ㒊ศࡔࡅࡋሗ࿌ࡋ࡚࠸࡞ࡗࡓࡽ࡛࠶ࡿࠋ 1990 ᖺ௦௨㝆ࠊSACS ࡣࢡࣞࢹࢸ࣮ࢩࣙࣥ᭦᪂㝿ࡋ࡚Ꮫ⏕ࡢᏛಟᡂᯝ࡞ࡢホ౯ࢆ ጞࡵࡓࠋࡋࡋࠊᏛࡣࡲࡔᏛ⏕ࡀ༞ᴗࡲ࡛Ꮫෆ࡛ఱࢆຮᙉࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࡢࠊᮏᙜᏛಟ ࡢᡂᯝࡣฟ࡚࠸ࡿࡢࠊ࠸࠺ࡇࢆᢕᥱࡋ࡚࠸࡞ࡗࡓࡢ࡛࠶ࡿࠋࡑࡢ⤖ᯝࠊGIT ࡣࡑ ࡢⅬ㛵ࡍࡿホ౯ࡣ࠶ࡲࡾࡼࡃ࡞ࡗࡓࠋᙜࠊIR ᐊ㠀ᖖ⬟ຊࡢ࠶ࡿࢫࢱࢵࣇࡣ࠸ࡓ ࡀࠊᏛ⏕ࡢᏛಟᡂᯝ࡞㛵ࡍࡿホ౯ࡢ⤒㦂ࡸࢫ࢟ࣝࡣ࡞ࡗࡓࡓࡵࠊࡑࡇ࡛᪂ࡓホ౯ ᐊࢆタ⨨ࡋࡓࡢ࡛࠶ࡿࠋ ࣓࡛ࣜ࢝ࡣᏛಟᡂᯝࡀ㠀ᖖ㔜どࡉࢀ࡚ࡁ࡚࠸ࡿࡀࠊࡑࢀࡣ 20 ᖺࡽ 25 ᖺࡃࡽ࠸๓ ࡽ࡛࠶ࡿࠋSACS ࡔࡅࡀࡇࢀࢆ᥎ዡࡋࡓ࠸࠺ࡇ࡛ࡣ࡞ࡃࠊࡑࡢࡢࡉࡲࡊࡲ࡞ᩍ ⫱ホ౯ᶵ㛵ࡸࣅࢪࢿࢫࢫࢡ࣮ࣝ࡞ࡀᥦၐࡋࡓ⤖ᯝ࡛࠶ࡿࠋSACS ࡢ⌮࡛ࡣࠊ1991 ᖺึࡵ࡚Ꮫಟᡂᯝࡢホ౯ࢆᥦၐࡋࡓࡀࠊᐇࡍࡿࡣ㛫ࡀࡗࡓࠋ GIT ࡢሙྜࠊ࠼ࡤࠊNational Survey of Student Engagement㸦௨ୗ NSSE ࠸࠺㸧 ࡢࣉࣟࢢ࣒ࣛࢆ᥇⏝ࡍࡿࠊ࠶ࡿ࠸ࡣ Collegiate Learning Assessment㸦௨ୗ CLA ࠸ ࠺㸧ࢆ᥇⏝ࡍࡿࠊࡲࡓࡣᏛ⊂⮬࡛Ꮫ⏕ࡢᏛಟᡂᯝࢆホ౯ࡍࡿࡘ࠸࡚ࡣࠊྛᑓᨷ (Major) ௵ࡉࢀ࡚࠸ࡿࠋࡇࡢⅬ㛵ࡋ࡚ࡣࠊᏛࡶࡋࡃࡣᏛ⌮ࡽࢻࣂࢫࢆ ཷࡅࡿࡇࡣ࠶ࡗ࡚ࡶࠊ᭱⤊Ỵᐃࡣྛᑓᨷ௵ࡉࢀ࡚࠸ࡿࠋCLA 㛵ࡋ࡚ࡣᜍࡽࡃࢥࢫࢺ ࡢၥ㢟࡛ࡢ㑅⪃ࡶࡗ࡚࠸࡞࠸ࡢࡀ⌧≧࡛࠶ࡿࠋ ホ౯ᐊࡣࠊᏛಟᡂᯝࡢホ౯ࢆࢥ࣮ࢹࢿ࣮ࢺࡲࡓࡣホ౯⤖ᯝࡢࡲࡵࢆ⾜ࡗ࡚࠸ࡿࠋල యⓗࡣࠊྛᑓᨷࡽࡢᏛಟᡂᯝࡢホ౯㛵ࡍࡿሗࢆ㞟ࡋࠊ࠺࠸࠺ホ౯ࡢ᪉ἲ࡛ࡑ ࢀࢆ⾜࠺࡞ࢆศᯒࡋࡓୖ࡛ࠊ࢞ࢲࣥࢫࡢᐇࡸࢹ࣮ࢱ࣮࣋ࢫࡢᵓ⠏ཬࡧグ㘓ࡢಖᏑ ࡞ࢆ⾜ࡗ࡚࠸ࡿࠋࡲࡓࠊࡑࡢぢ┤ࡋࡸᨵၿࡶ⾜ࡗ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ 㸱㸬㹁㹁㹐ཬࡧ㹏㹃㹎ࡢసᡂ SACS ࡢ CCR 㛵ࡋࠊ௨๓ࡣ࢙࢘ࣈୖࡢసᡂ࣭ᥦฟࡀồࡵࡽࢀࡿྠࠊ᭩㠃ࡢ ࡶࡢࡶసᡂ࣭ᥦฟࡀồࡵࡽࢀ࡚࠸ࡓࠋGIT ࡢሗ࡞ࡢከࡃࡣ࢙࢘ࣈୖ࠶ࡿࡢ࡛ࠊࡇࢀ ࢆ᭩㠃᭩ࡁ࠼࡚ᥦฟࡍࡿ࠸࠺ࡢࡣኚ࡞ປຊ࡛࠶ࡗࡓࡀࠊࡑࡢᚋࠊ࢙࢘ࣈୖࡢࡳࡢ ᥦฟࡀㄆࡵࡽࢀࡿࡼ࠺࡞ࡗࡓࠋGIT ࡣࠊ2005 ᖺ SACS CCR ࢆᥦฟࡋࡓ㝿ࠊSACS ᑐࡋ࡚Ꮫෆሗࡢࢡࢭࢫᶒࢆ࠼ࠊ࢙࢘ࣈୖࡢࡳ࡛ࡢసᡂ࣭ᥦฟ࡞ࡗࡓࡢ࡛సᴗ ࡢ㈇ᢸࡀ㠀ᖖᑡ࡞ࡃ࡞ࡗࡓࠋ SACS ࡢホ౯ဨࡀᏛࡢࡢሗࢡࢭ ࢫࡋࠊ࠺࠸ࡗࡓෆᐜࢆ☜ㄆࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࡣ ࡚㠀බ⾲࡛࠶ࡿࠋࡲࡓࠊ࢙࢘ࣈୖ࡛ࢡࢭࢫ ࡋࡓሗࡣ㜀ぴࡍࡿࡔࡅ࡛࠶ࡾࠊࢥࣆ࣮ࡸ ࡢホ౯ဨࡢሗඹ᭷ࢆࡋ࡚ࡣ࡞ࡽ࡞࠸ ࠸࠺つ๎ࡀ࠶ࡾࠊዎ⣙ୖ࡛ࡶ⛎ᐦࢆཝᏲࡋ࡞ ࡅࢀࡤ࡞ࡽ࡞࠸ࡇ࡞ࡗ࡚࠸ࡿࠋࡲࡓࠊホ ౯ࡢ㐣⛬࠾࠸࡚ࠊ㛵㐃ࢹ࣮ࢱ࡞ࢆ᭩㠃࡛ ࢲ࣮࢘ࣥࣟࢻࡋࡓሙྜࠊホ౯⤊ᚋࠊ㏿ࡸ ሗࢆ◚Რࡍࡿࡇࡸࢹ࣮ࢱࡢሙྜࡣ๐㝖 ࡍࡿࡇ࡞ࡶつᐃࡉࢀ࡚࠸ࡿࠋࡇ࠺ࡋ࡚᭱⤊ⓗࡣࠊホ౯ࡢ⤖ᯝᨵၿࡢࡓࡵࡢ່࿌ࡢ 133 ࡳࡀᏛ㏻▱ࡉࢀබ⾲ࡉࢀࡿࡇ࡞ࡿࠋ ࡋࡋࠊ5 ᖺࡈࡢ QEP ࡢᥦฟ㛵ࡋ࡚ࡣࠊࡇࢀࡣ᭩㠃ࡢࡶࡢࡔࡅ࡛࠶ࡾࠊసᡂࡣ ኚⱞປࢆࡋࡓ⤒㦂ࡀ࠶ࡿࠋ2011 ᖺࡢ QEP ࡢసᡂ㛵ࡋ࡚ࡣࠊGIT ࡛ࡣࡘࡢࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡ ࢺࢆ❧ୖࡆࡓࠋ୍ࡘࡣᏛኈㄢ⛬ࡢᏛ⏕ࡢᅜ㝿ࣉࣟࢢ࣒ࣛࡢࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺࠊࡶ࠺୍ࡘࡣᏛ⏕ ࡢࣜࢧ࣮ࢳࡢࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺ࡛࠶ࡿࠋQEP ࡢసᡂᙜࡓࡗ࡚ࡶホ౯ᐊࡀ❆ཱྀ࡞ࡾࠊண⟬⟶ ⌮࡞ࡶྵࡵࠊయࡢࡲࡵᙺࢆᯝࡓࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ GIT ࡛ࡣࠊQEP ᥦฟᚋࡶᏛ⏕ࡢࣜࢧ࣮ࢳࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺࢆ⥅⥆ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋࡘࡲࡾࠊᏛ ࡋ࡚ࡣホ౯ࡀࡲࡔ⥅⥆୰࡛ࠊ᭱⤊ⓗࡣ 2013 ᖺࡲ࡛᭱⤊ⓗ࡞ࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺࡢホ౯ࢆ ⾜࠸ࠊ2015 ᖺࡢࢡࣞࢹࢸ࣮ࢩࣙࣥ᭦᪂ഛ࠼ࡿࡢ࡛࠶ࡿࠋ࡞࠾ࠊୖ㏙ࡢᅜ㝿ࣉࣟࢢࣛ ࣒ࡣࠊCouncil for Higher Education Accreditation(CHEA)ࡽ 2012 ᖺࡢ CHEA ㈹ࡢཷ ㈹ࡀỴࡲࡗࡓࠋࡘࡲࡾᶍ⠊ⓗ࡞ホ౯άືࡀ⾜ࢃࢀࡓࡢ࡛࠶ࡿࠋ 䠐䠊ሗ䛾බ⾲䛺䛹 GIT ࡣබ❧Ꮫ࡛࠶ࡿࡓࡵࠊᕞᨻᗓࡸ㐃㑥ᨻᗓࡣἲ௧࡞ᇶ࡙ࡁࠊᏛࡢሗࡢබ⾲ ࢆồࡵࡽࢀࡿሙྜࡣ࠶ࡿࡀࠊSACS ഃࡽᏛࡢ CCR ࡸ QEP ࡞ࡢሗࢆබ⾲ࡋ࡚ࡣ࠸ ࡞࠸ࠋබ⾲ࡍࡿࡢࡣၥ㢟Ⅼ࡞ࢆྵࡴࢡࣞࢹࢸ࣮ࢩࣙࣥࡢ⤖ᯝࡔࡅ࡛࠶ࡾࠊࡑࡢヲ⣽ ࡢሗࡶබ⾲ࡋ࡚࠸࡞࠸ࠋ 㧗➼ᩍ⫱ᶵ㛵ࡢ㉁ࢆྥୖࡉࡏࡿࡇࡀ SACS ࡢ┠ⓗ࡛࠶ࡿࡀࠊࢡࣞࢹࢸ࣮ࢩࣙࣥ㐣 ⛬ࡢ࡚ࡢヲ⣽࡞ሗࢆබࡋࡓሙྜࠊࡑࢀࡀ SACS ࡢ┠ⓗࡢ㐩ᡂࡘ࡞ࡀࡿ࠺ࡀ ၥࢃࢀࡿࡇࡶ࠶ࡿࠋ࠼ࡤࠊᐇᆅホ౯ SACS ࡢホ౯ဨ㠃ㄯࡍࡿࡁࠊෆᐜࡀබ 㛤ࡉࢀࡿࡇࢆᜍࢀ࡚ᮏ㡢࡛ヰࡀ࡛ࡁ࡞࠸࠸࠺≧ἣ࡞ࡗ࡚ࡣ࠸ࡅ࡞࠸࠸࠺ࡇ࡛࠶ ࡿࠋSACS ࡢ┠ⓗࡢ㐩ᡂࡢࡓࡵᮏ㡢࡛ヰࡀ࡛ࡁࡿࡇࢆ☜ᐇࡍࡿࡓࡵࠊヲ⣽࡞ሗ ࢆ࠶࠼࡚බ⾲ࡋ࡞࠸ࡢࡣ SACS ࡢ⪃࠼᪉࡛࠶ࡿࠋ SACS ࡢࢡࣞࢹࢸ࣮ࢩ࡛ࣙࣥࡣࠊSACS ࡢᑓ௵ࢫࢱࢵࣇࡀホ౯ࢳ࣮࣒ࡢ୍ဨࡋ࡚ ᐇᆅホ౯࡞ྠ⾜ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋࡶࡕࢁࢇ SACS ࡢࢫࢱࢵࣇࡣホ౯ࡢពᛮỴᐃࡣཧຍࡋ࡞ ࠸ࡀࠊࢳ࣮࣒ࡢ࡞ホ౯⤒㦂ࡢᑡ࡞࠸࠶ࡿ࠸ࡣ⤒㦂ࡢ࡞࠸࣓ࣥࣂ࣮ࡶ࠸ࡿࡢ࡛ࠊࡇࡢ ࡣ SACS ࡢホ౯᪉㔪ࠊᇶ‽ཬࡧホ౯᪉ἲ࡞୍␒⢭㏻ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࢫࢱࢵࣇࡀᚲせᛂࡌ ࡚ࢥ࣮ࢹࢿ࣮ࢺࡸࢻࣂࢫ࡞ࢆࡍࡿࠋࡇࡢⅬ࡛ࡣࠊࡁ࡞ᙺࢆᯝࡓࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ 䠄⩚⏣✚⏨㻌 ᪥ᮏᏛᩥ⌮Ꮫ㒊ᩍᤵ䠅 134 Ϭ ㈨ᩱ⦅ 資料１ アクレディテーション 評価基準 The Principles of Accreditation: Foundations for Quality Enhancement Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Commission on Colleges 1866 Southern Lane Decatur, Georgia 30033-4097 404-679-4500 404-679-4558 (Fax) www.sacscoc.org Approved by the College Delegate Assembly: December 2001 Revised by the College Delegate Assembly: December 2006, 2007, 2009, 2011 Fifth Edition First Printing 137 Copyright 2012 by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Commission on Colleges 138 CONTENTS n SACS COMMISSION ON COLLEGES Mission ..............................................................................................1 Philosophy ..........................................................................................2 Organization of the Commission and the Association ............4 The Process of Accreditation ..........................................................5 n SECTION 1: The Principle of Integrity ................................................................11 n SECTION 2: Core Requirements ........................................................................15 n SECTION 3: Comprehensive Standards............................................................23 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.8 3.9 3.10 3.11 3.12 3.13 3.14 Institutional Mission ............................................................25 Governance and Administration ..........................................25 Institutional Effectiveness ....................................................27 All Educational Programs ....................................................28 Undergraduate Programs ....................................................29 Graduate and Post-Baccalaureate Professional Programs......30 Faculty ................................................................................30 Library and Other Learning Resources ................................31 Student Affairs and Services ................................................31 Financial Resources ..............................................................32 Physical Resources ..............................................................32 Substantive Change Procedures and Policy ........................33 Compliance with Other Commission Policies ....................33 Representation of Status ......................................................34 n SECTION 4: Federal Requirements ..................................................................37 n APPENDIX: Commission Policies ......................................................................43 Commission Guidelines ................................................................43 Commission Good Practices ...................................................... 43 Commission Position Statements ................................................44 139 n OVERVIEW The Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Commission on Colleges 140 MISSION The Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Commission on Colleges is the regional body for the accreditation of degree-granting higher education institutions in the Southern states. The Commission’s mission is the enhancement of educational quality throughout the region and the improvement of the effectiveness of institutions by ensuring that they meet standards established by the higher education community that address the needs of society and students. It serves as the common denominator of shared values and practices among the diverse institutions in Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, Latin America, and other international sites approved by the Commission on Colleges that award associate, baccalaureate, master’s, or doctoral degrees. The Commission also accepts applications from other international institutions of higher education. Accreditation by SACS Commission on Colleges signifies that the institution (1) has a mission appropriate to higher education, (2) has resources, programs, and services sufficient to accomplish and sustain that mission, and (3) maintains clearly specified educational objectives that are consistent with its mission and appropriate to the degrees it offers, and that indicate whether it is successful in achieving its stated objectives. 141 PHILOSOPHY Self-regulation through accreditation embodies a traditional U.S. philosophy that a free people can and ought to govern themselves through a representative, flexible, and responsive system. Accordingly, accreditation is best accomplished through a voluntary association of educational institutions. Both a process and a product, accreditation relies on integrity, thoughtful and principled judgment, rigorous application of requirements, and a context of trust. The process provides an assessment of an institution’s effectiveness in the fulfillment of its mission, its compliance with the requirements of its accrediting association, and its continuing efforts to enhance the quality of student learning and its programs and services. Based upon reasoned judgment, the process stimulates evaluation and improvement, while providing a means of continuing accountability to constituents and the public. The product of accreditation is a public statement of an institution’s continuing capacity to provide effective programs and services based on agreedupon requirements. The statement of an institution’s accreditation status with the Commission on Colleges is also an affirmation of an institution’s continuing commitment to the Commission’s principles and philosophy of accreditation. The Commission on Colleges expects institutions to dedicate themselves to enhancing the quality of their programs and services within the context of their resources and capacities and to create an environment in which teaching, public service, research, and learning occur, as appropriate to the mission. At the heart of the Commission’s philosophy of accreditation, the concept of quality enhancement presumes each member institution to be engaged in an ongoing program of improvement and be able to demonstrate how well it fulfills its stated mission. Although evaluation of an institution’s educational quality and its effectiveness in achieving its mission is a difficult task requiring careful analysis and professional judgment, an institution is expected to document the quality and effectiveness of all its programs and services. The Commission on Colleges supports the right of an institution to pursue its established educational mission; the right of faculty members to teach, investigate, and publish freely; and the right of students to access opportunities for learning and for the open exchange of ideas. However, the exercise of these rights should not interfere with the overriding obligation of an institution to offer its students a sound education. 142 The Commission on Colleges adheres to the following fundamental characteristics of accreditation: n Participation in the accreditation process is voluntary and is an earned and renewable status. n Member institutions develop, amend, and approve accreditation requirements. n The process of accreditation is representative, responsive, and appropriate to the types of institutions accredited. n Accreditation is a form of self-regulation. n Accreditation requires institutional commitment and engagement. n Accreditation is based upon a peer review process. n Accreditation requires an institutional commitment to student learning and achievement. n Accreditation acknowledges an institution’s prerogative to articulate its mission, including a religious mission, within the recognized context of higher education and its responsibility to show that it is accomplishing its mission. n Accreditation requires institutional commitment to the concept of quality enhancement through continuous assessment and improvement. n Accreditation expects an institution to develop a balanced governing structure designed to promote institutional integrity, autonomy, and flexibility of operation. n Accreditation expects an institution to ensure that its programs are complemented by support structures and resources that allow for the total growth and development of its students. 143 ORGANIZATION OF THE COMMISSION AND THE SOUTHERN ASSOCIATION OF COLLEGES AND SCHOOLS The Southern Association of Colleges and Schools (SACS) is a private, nonprofit, voluntary organization founded in 1895 in Atlanta, Georgia. The Association is comprised of the Commission on Colleges, which accredits higher education degree-granting institutions, and the Council on Accreditation and School Improvement, which accredits elementary, middle, and secondary schools. The Commission and Council, each separately incorporated, carry out their missions with autonomy; they develop their own standards and procedures and govern themselves by a delegate assembly. The College Delegate Assembly is comprised of one voting representative (the chief executive officer or the officer’s designee) from each member institution. Its responsibilities include electing the seventy seven-member Board of Trustees of the SACS Commission on Colleges and guiding the organization’s work, approving all revisions in accrediting standards as recommended by the Board, approving the dues of candidate and member institutions as recommended by the Board, electing an Appeals Committee to hear appeals of adverse accreditation decisions, and electing representatives to the Association’s Board of Trustees. The Commission’s Board of Trustees is responsible for recommending to the College Delegate Assembly standards for candidacy and membership, authorizing special visits, taking final action on the accreditation status of institutions, nominating to the College Delegate Assembly individuals for election to succeed outgoing members of the Board, electing an Executive Council that will act for the Board while it is not in session, appointing ad hoc study committees as needed, and approving the policies and procedures of the Commission on Colleges. The thirteen-member Executive Council is the executive arm of the Board and functions on behalf of the Commission’s Board and the College Delegate Assembly between sessions. However, the actions of the Council are subject to review and approval by the Board. The Council interprets Commission policies and procedures, develops procedures for and supervises the work of adhoc and standing committees of the Commission, approves goals and objectives of the Commission, reviews and approves the Commission’s budget, oversees and annually evaluates the work of its president, and initiates new programs, projects, and policy proposals. 144 The Council receives and acts on reports from all adhoc and standing committees and submits them to the Commission’s Board of Trustees. In the case of institutions applying for candidacy, membership, or reaffirmation of accreditation, the Executive Council receives recommendations from the Committees on Compliance and Reports, which are the standing evaluation committees of the Commission, and, in turn, submits its recommendations to the total Board of Trustees of SACS Commission on Colleges. THE PROCESS OF ACCREDITATION The process for initial and continued accreditation involves a collective analysis and judgment by the institution’s internal constituencies, an informed review by peers external to the institution, and a reasoned decision by the elected members of the Commission on Colleges Board of Trustees. Accredited institutions periodically conduct internal reviews involving their administrative officers, staffs, faculties, students, trustees, and others appropriate to the process. The internal review allows an institution to consider its effectiveness in achieving its stated mission, its compliance with the Commission’s accreditation requirements, its efforts in enhancing the quality of student learning and the quality of programs and services offered to its constituencies, and its success in accomplishing its mission. At the culmination of the internal review, peer evaluators representing the Commission apply their professional judgment through a preliminary assessment of the institution; elected Board Members make the final determination of an institution’s compliance with the accreditation requirements. Application of the Requirements The Commission on Colleges bases its accreditation of degree-granting higher education institutions and entities on requirements in the Principles of Accreditation: Foundations for Quality Enhancement. These requirements apply to all institutional programs and services, wherever located or however delivered. This includes programs offered through distance and correspondence education, off-campus sites, and branch campuses. Consequently, when preparing documents for the Commission demonstrating compliance with the Principles of Accreditation, an institution must include these programs in its “Institutional Summary Form Prepared for Commission Reviews” and address these programs in its analysis and documentation of compliance. (See Commission policy “Distance and Correspondence Education.”) For purposes of accreditation, the programs above are defined as follows: Branch campus. A branch campus is a location of an institution that is geographically apart and independent of the main campus of the institution. A location is independent of the main campus if the location is 145 n n n n permanent in nature; offers courses in educational programs leading to a degree, certificate, or other recognized educational credential; has its own faculty and administrative or supervisory organization; and has its own budgetary and hiring authority. Correspondence education. Correspondence education is a formal educational process under which the institution provides instructional materials, by mail or electronic transmission, including examinations on the materials, to students who are separated from the instructor. Interaction between the instructor and the student is limited, is not regular and substantive, and is primarily initiated by the student; courses are typically self-paced. Distance education. Distance education is a formal educational process in which the majority of the instruction (interaction between students and instructors and among students) in a course occurs when students and instructors are not in the same place. Instruction may be synchronous or asynchronous. A distance education course may use the internet; one-way and two-way transmissions through open broadcast, closed circuit, cable, microwave, broadband lines, fiber optics, satellite, or wireless communications devices; audio conferencing; or video cassettes, DVD’s, and CD-ROMs if used as part of the distance learning course or program. Off-campus Site. An off-campus site is an instructional site that is located geographically apart from the main campus of the institution whereby a student can obtain 50 percent or more of the coursework toward a credential. The site is not independent of the institution’s main campus. The Commission on Colleges applies the requirements of its Principles to all applicant, candidate, and member institutions, regardless of the type of institution: private for-profit, private not-for-profit, or public. The Commission evaluates an institution and makes accreditation decisions based on the following: n Compliance with the Principle of Integrity (Section 1) n Compliance with the Core Requirements (Section 2) n Compliance with the Comprehensive Standards (Section 3) n Compliance with additional Federal Requirements (Section 4) n Compliance with the policies of the Commission on Colleges (See Appendix for definition, description, and reference to policies. Access Commission’s Web page: www.sacscoc.org.) 146 Components of the Review Process The Commission conducts several types of institutional reviews: (1) Candidate Committee reviews of institutions seeking candidacy, (2) Accreditation Committee reviews of candidate institutions seeking initial membership, (3) Reaffirmation Committee reviews of member institutions seeking continued accreditation following a comprehensive review, (4) Special Committee reviews of member institutions seeking continued accreditation following evaluation of institutional circumstances that are accreditation related, and (5) Substantive Change Committee reviews of member institutions seeking approval and continued accreditation following the review of a change of a significant modification or expansion to the institution’s nature and scope. Each of the above types of reviews has its own evaluation documents and peer review procedures and can be found on the Commission’s Web site: www.sacscoc.org . The process described below is specific to a member institution seeking reaffirmation of accreditation. Preparation by the Institution As part of the reaffirmation process, the institution will provide two separate documents. 1. Compliance Certification The Compliance Certification, submitted approximately fifteen months in advance of an institution’s scheduled reaffirmation, is a document completed by the institution that demonstrates its judgment of the extent of its compliance with each of the Core Requirements, Comprehensive Standards, and Federal Requirements. Signatures by the institution’s chief executive officer and accreditation liaison are required to certify compliance. By signing the document, the individuals certify that the process of institutional selfassessment has been thorough, honest, and forthright, and that the information contained in the document is truthful, accurate, and complete. 2. Quality Enhancement Plan The Quality Enhancement Plan (QEP), submitted four to six weeks in advance of the on-site review by the Commission, is a document developed by the institution that (1) includes a process identifying key issues emerging from institutional assessment, (2) focuses on learning outcomes and/or the environment supporting student learn- 147 ing and accomplishing the mission of the institution, (3) demonstrates institutional capability for the initiation, implementation, and completion of the QEP, (4) includes broad-based involvement of institutional constituencies in the development and proposed implementation of the QEP, and (5) identifies goals and a plan to assess their achievement. The QEP should be focused and succinct (no more than seventy-five pages of narrative text and no more than twentyfive pages of supporting documentation or charts, graphs, and tables). Review by the Commission on Colleges 1. The Off-Site Review The Off-Site Reaffirmation Committee, composed of a chair and normally eight to ten evaluators, meets in Atlanta, Georgia, and reviews Compliance Certifications of a group of institutions to determine whether each institution is in compliance with all Core Requirements (except Core Requirement 2.12), Comprehensive Standards (except Comprehensive Standard 3.3.2), and Federal Requirements. The group of institutions evaluated, called a cluster, consists of no more than three institutions similar in governance and degrees offered. At the conclusion of the review, the Off-Site Reaffirmation Committee will prepare a separate report for each institution, recording and explaining its decisions regarding compliance. The report is forwarded to the respective institution’s On-Site Reaffirmation Committee which makes its final determination on compliance. 2. The On-Site Review Following review by the Off-Site Reaffirmation Committee, an OnSite Reaffirmation Committee will conduct a focused evaluation at the campus to finalize issues of compliance with the Core Requirements, Comprehensive Standards, and Federal Requirements; provide consultation regarding the issues addressed in the QEP; and evaluate the acceptability of the QEP. At the conclusion of its visit, the On-Site Committee will finalize the Report of the Reaffirmation Committee, a written report of its findings noting areas of non-compliance, including the acceptability of the QEP. The Report of the Reaffirmation Committee, along with the institution’s response to areas of non-compliance, will be forwarded to the Commission’s Board of Trustees for review and action on reaffirmation. 148 3. Review by the Commission’s Board of Trustees The Committees on Compliance and Reports (C & R), standing committees of the Board, review reports prepared by evaluation committees and the institutional responses to those reports. A C & R Committee’s recommendation regarding an institution’s reaffirmation of accreditation is forwarded to the Executive Council for review. The Executive Council recommends action to the full Board of Trustees which makes the final decision on reaffirmation and any monitoring activities that it may require of an institution. The full Board convenes twice a year. 149 n SECTION 1: The Principle of Integrity 150 Integrity, essential to the purpose of higher education, functions as the basic contract defining the relationship between the Commission and each of its member and candidate institutions. It is a relationship in which all parties agree to deal honestly and openly with their constituencies and with one another. Without this commitment, no relationship can exist or be sustained between the Commission and its accredited and candidate institutions. Integrity in the accreditation process is best understood in the context of peer review, professional judgment by peers of commonly accepted sound academic practice, and the conscientious application of the Principles of Accreditation as mutually agreed upon standards for accreditation. The Commission’s requirements, policies, processes, procedures, and decisions are predicated on integrity. The Commission on Colleges expects integrity to govern the operation of institutions and for institutions to make reasonable and responsible decisions consistent with the spirit of integrity in all matters. Therefore, evidence of withholding information, providing inaccurate information to the public, failing to provide timely and accurate information to the Commission, or failing to conduct a candid self-assessment of compliance with the Principles of Accreditation and to submit this assessment to the Commission, and other similar practices will be seen as the lack of a full commitment to integrity. The Commission’s policy statement “Integrity and Accuracy in Institutional Representation” gives examples of the application of the principle of integrity in accreditation activities. The policy is not all-encompassing nor does it address all possible situations. (See Commission policy “Integrity and Accuracy in Institutional Representation.”) Failure of an institution to adhere to the integrity principle may result in a loss of accreditation or candidacy. 1.1 The institution operates with integrity in all matters. (Integrity) (Note: This principle is not addressed by the institution in its Compliance Certification.) 151 n SECTION 2: Core Requirements 152 Core Requirements are basic, broad-based, foundational requirements that an institution must meet to be accredited with the Commission on Colleges. They establish a threshold of development required of an institution seeking initial or continued accreditation by the Commission and reflect the Commission’s basic expectations of candidate and member institutions. Compliance with the Core Requirements is not sufficient to warrant accreditation or reaffirmation of accreditation. Accredited institutions must also demonstrate compliance with the Comprehensive Standards and the Federal Requirements of the Principles, and with the policies of the Commission. An applicant institution seeking candidacy is required to document compliance with Core Requirements 2.1 – 2.11; Comprehensive Standards 3.3.1, 3.5.1, and 3.7.1; and Federal Requirements 4.1 – 4.9 to be authorized a Candidacy Committee or to be awarded candidacy or candidacy renewal. An applicant/candidate institution is not required to document compliance with Core Requirement 2.12 until it undergoes its first review for reaffirmation following initial accreditation. (See Commission policy “Accreditation Procedures for Applicant Institutions.”) An accredited institution is required to document compliance with all Core Requirements, including Core Requirement 2.12, before it can be reaffirmed. If an institution fails to document compliance with Core Requirements at the time of reaffiremation or at the time of any review, the Commission will place the institution on sanction or take adverse action. (See Commission policy “Sanctions, Denial of Reaffirmation, and Removal from Membership.”) Core Requirement 2.12 requires an institution to develop an acceptable Quality Enhancement Plan (QEP). Engaging the wider academic community, the QEP is based upon a comprehensive and thorough analysis of the effectiveness of the learning environment for supporting student learning and accomplishing the mission of the institution. Implicit in every Core Requirement mandating a policy or procedure is the expectation that the policy or procedure is in writing and has been approved through appropriate institutional processes, published in appropriate institutional documents accessible to those affected by the policy or procedure, and implemented and enforced by the institution. 2.1 The institution has degree-granting authority from the appropriate government agency or agencies. (Degree-granting Authority) 2.2 The institution has a governing board of at least five members that 153 is the legal body with specific authority over the institution. The board is an active policy-making body for the institution and is ultimately responsible for ensuring that the financial resources of the institution are adequate to provide a sound educational program. The board is not controlled by a minority of board members or by organizations or interests separate from it. Both the presiding officer of the board and a majority of other voting members of the board are free of any contractual, employment, or personal or familial financial interest in the institution. A military institution authorized and operated by the federal government to award degrees has a public board on which both the presiding officer and a majority of the other members are neither civilian employees of the military nor active/retired military. The board has broad and significant influence upon the institution’s programs and operations, plays an active role in policy-making, and ensures that the financial resources of the institution are used to provide a sound educational program. The board is not controlled by a minority of board members or by organizations or interests separate from the board except as specified by the authorizing legislation. Both the presiding officer of the board and a majority of other voting board members are free of any contractual, employment, or personal or familial financial interest in the institution. (Governing Board) 2.3 The institution has a chief executive officer whose primary responsibility is to the institution and who is not the presiding officer of the board. (See Commission policy “Core Requirement 2.3: Documenting an Alternate Approach.”) (Chief Executive Officer) 2.4 The institution has a clearly defined, comprehensive, and published mission statement that is specific to the institution and appropriate for higher education. The mission addresses teaching and learning and, where applicable, research and public service. (Institutional Mission) 2.5 The institution engages in ongoing, integrated, and institution-wide research-based planning and evaluation processes that (1) incorporate a systematic review of institutional mission, goals, and outcomes; (2) result in continuing improvement in institutional quality; and (3) demonstrate the institution is effectively accomplishing its mission. (Institutional Effectiveness) 2.6 The institution is in operation and has students enrolled in degree programs. (Continuous Operation) 154 2.7 2.7.1 The institution offers one or more degree programs based on at least 60 semester credit hours or the equivalent at the associate level; at least 120 semester credit hours or the equivalent at the baccalaureate level; or at least 30 semester credit hours or the equivalent at the post-baccalaureate, graduate, or professional level. If an institution uses a unit other than semester credit hours, it provides an explanation for the equivalency. The institution also provides a justification for all degrees that include fewer than the required number of semester credit hours or its equivalent unit. (Program Length) 2.7.2 The institution offers degree programs that embody a coherent course of study that is compatible with its stated mission and is based upon fields of study appropriate to higher education. (Program Content) 2.7.3 In each undergraduate degree program, the institution requires the successful completion of a general education component at the collegiate level that (1) is a substantial component of each undergraduate degree, (2) ensures breadth of knowledge, and (3) is based on a coherent rationale. For degree completion in associate programs, the component constitutes a minimum of 15 semester hours or the equivalent; for baccalaureate programs, a minimum of 30 semester hours or the equivalent. These credit hours are to be drawn from and include at least one course from each of the following areas: humanities/fine arts, social/behavioral sciences, and natural science/mathematics. The courses do not narrowly focus on those skills, techniques, and procedures specific to a particular occupation or profession. If an institution uses a unit other than semester credit hours, it provides an explanation for the equivalency. The institution also provides a justification if it allows for fewer than the required number of semester credit hours or its equivalent unit of general education courses. (General Education) 2.7.4 The institution provides instruction for all course work required for at least one degree program at each level at which it awards degrees. If the institution does not provide instruction for all such course work and (1) makes arrangements for some instruction to be provided by other accredited institutions or entities through contracts or consortia or (2) uses some other alternative approach to meeting this requirement, the alternative approach must be approved by the Commission on Colleges. In both cases, the institution demon155 strates that it controls all aspects of its educational program. (See Commission policy “Core Requirement 2.7.4: Documenting an Alternate Approach.”) (Course work for Degrees) 2.8 The number of full-time faculty members is adequate to support the mission of the institution and to ensure the quality and integrity of each of its academic programs. Upon application for candidacy, an applicant institution demonstrates that it meets the comprehensive standard for faculty qualifications. (Faculty) 2.9 The institution, through ownership or formal arrangements or agreements, provides and supports student and faculty access and user privileges to adequate library collections and services and to other learning/information resources consistent with the degrees offered. Collections, resources, and services are sufficient to support all its educational, research, and public service programs. (Learning Resources and Services) 2.10 The institution provides student support programs, services, and activities consistent with its mission that are intended to promote student learning and enhance the development of its students. (Student Support Services) 2.11 2.11.1 The institution has a sound financial base and demonstrated financial stability to support the mission of the institution and the scope of its programs and services. The member institution provides the following financial statements: (1) an institutional audit (or Standard Review Report issued in accordance with Statements on Standards for Accounting and Review Services issued by the AICPA for those institutions audited as part of a systemwide or statewide audit) and written institutional management letter for the most recent fiscal year prepared by an independent certified public accountant and/or an appropriate governmental auditing agency employing the appropriate audit (or Standard Review Report) guide; (2) a statement of financial position of unrestricted net assets, exclusive of plant assets and plant-related debt, which represents the change in unrestricted net assets attributable to operations for the most recent year; and (3) an annual budget that is preceded by sound planning, is subject to sound fiscal procedures, and is approved by the governing board. 156 Audit requirements for applicant institutions may be found in the Commission policy “Accreditation Procedures for Applicant Institutions.” (Financial Resources) 2.11.2 The institution has adequate physical resources to support the mission of the institution and the scope of its programs and services. (Physical Resources) 2.12 The institution has developed an acceptable Quality Enhancement Plan (QEP) that includes an institutional process for identifying key issues emerging from institutional assessment and focuses on learning outcomes and/or the environment supporting student learning and accomplishing the mission of the institution. (Quality Enhancement Plan) (Note: This requirement is not addressed by the institution in its Compliance Certification.) 157 n SECTION 3: Comprehensive Standards 158 The Comprehensive Standards set forth requirements in the following four areas: (1) institutional mission, governance, and effectiveness; (2) programs; (3) resources; and (4) institutional responsibility for Commission policies. The Comprehensive Standards are more specific to the operations of the institution, represent good practice in higher education, and establish a level of accomplishment expected of all member institutions. If an institution is judged to be significantly out of compliance with one or more of the Comprehensive Standards, the Commission’s Board of Trustees may deny reaffirmation and place the institution on a sanction or, in the case of other reviews, place the institution on a sanction. (See Commission policy “Sanctions, Denial of Reaffirmation, and Removal from Membership.”) A candidate institution is required to document compliance with Core Requirements 2.1-2.11, all the Comprehensive Standards (except 3.3.2), and Federal Requirements in order to be awarded initial membership. Implicit in every Comprehensive Standard mandating a policy or procedure is the expectation that the policy or procedure is in writing and has been approved through appropriate institutional processes, published in appropriate institutional documents accessible to those affected by the policy or procedure, and implemented and enforced by the institution. INSTITUTIONAL MISSION, GOVERNANCE, AND EFFECTIVENESS 3.1 Institutional Mission 3.1.1 The mission statement is current and comprehensive, accurately guides the institution’s operations, is periodically reviewed and updated, is approved by the governing board, and is communicated to the institution’s constituencies.(Mission) 3.2 Governance and Administration 3.2.1 The governing board of the institution is responsible for the selection and the periodic evaluation of the chief executive officer. (CEO evaluation/selection) 3.2.2 The legal authority and operating control of the institution are clearly defined for the following areas within the institution’s governance structure: (Governing board control) 159 3.2.2.1 institution’s mission; 3.2.2.2 fiscal stability of the institution; and 3.2.2.3 institutional policy. 3.2.3 The governing board has a policy addressing conflict of interest for its members. (Board conflict of interest) 3.2.4 The governing board is free from undue influence from political, religious, or other external bodies and protects the institution from such influence. (External influence) 3.2.5 The governing board has a policy whereby members can be dismissed only for appropriate reasons and by a fair process. (Board dismissal) 3.2.6 There is a clear and appropriate distinction, in writing and practice, between the policy-making functions of the governing board and the responsibility of the administration and faculty to administer and implement policy. (Board/administration distinction) 3.2.7 The institution has a clearly defined and published organizational structure that delineates responsibility for the administration of policies. (Organizational structure) 3.2.8 The institution has qualified administrative and academic officers with the experience and competence to lead the institution. (Qualified administrative/academic officers) 3.2.9 The institution publishes policies regarding appointment, employment, and evaluation of all personnel. (Personnel appointment) 3.2.10 The institution periodically evaluates the effectiveness of its administrators. (Administrative staff evaluations) 3.2.11 The institution’s chief executive officer has ultimate responsibility for, and exercises appropriate administrative and fiscal control over, the institution’s intercollegiate athletics program. (Control of intercollegiate athletics) 3.2.12 The institution demonstrates that its chief executive officer controls the institution’s fund-raising activities. (Fund-raising activities) 3.2.13 For any entity organized separately from the institution and formed primarily for the purpose of supporting the institution or its programs, 160 (1) the legal authority and operating control of the institution is clearly defined with respect to that entity; (2) the relationship of that entity to the institution and the extent of any liability arising out of that relationship is clearly described in a formal, written manner; and (3) the institution demonstrates that (a) the chief executive officer controls any fund-raising activities of that entity or (b) the fund-raising activities of that entity are defined in a formal, written manner which assures that those activities further the mission of the institution. (Institution-related entities) 3.2.14 The institution’s policies are clear concerning ownership of materials, compensation, copyright issues, and the use of revenue derived from the creation and production of all intellectual property. These policies apply to students, faculty, and staff. (Intellectual property rights) 3.3 Institutional Effectiveness 3.3.1 The institution identifies expected outcomes, assesses the extent to which it achieves these outcomes, and provides evidence of improvement based on analysis of the results in each of the following areas: (Institutional Effectiveness) 3.3.1.1 educational programs, to include student learning outcomes 3.3.1.2 administrative support services 3.3.1.3 academic and student support services 3.3.1.4 research within its mission, if appropriate 3.3.1.5 community/public service within its mission, if appropriate 3.3.2 The institution has developed a Quality Enhancement Plan that (1) demonstrates institutional capability for the initiation, implementation, and completion of the QEP; (2) includes broad-based involvement of institutional constituencies in the development and proposed implementation of the QEP; and (3) identifies goals and a plan to assess their achievement. (Quality Enhancement Plan) (Note: This requirement is not addressed by the institution in its Compliance Certification.) 161 PROGRAMS 3.4 All Educational Programs 3.4.1 The institution demonstrates that each educational program for which academic credit is awarded is approved by the faculty and the administration. (Academic program approval) 3.4.2 The institution’s continuing education, outreach, and service programs are consistent with the institution’s mission. (Continuing education/service programs) 3.4.3 The institution publishes admissions policies that are consistent with its mission. (Admissions policies) 3.4.4 The institution publishes policies that include criteria for evaluating, awarding, and accepting credit for transfer, experiential learning, credit by examination, Advanced Placement, and professional certificates that is consistent with its mission and ensures that course work and learning outcomes are at the collegiate level and comparable to the institution’s own degree programs. The institution assumes responsibility for the academic quality of any course work or credit recorded on the institution’s transcript. (See Commission policy “Collaborative Academic Arrangements.”) (Acceptance of academic credit) 3.4.5 The institution publishes academic policies that adhere to principles of good educational practice. These policies are disseminated to students, faculty, and other interested parties through publications that accurately represent the programs and services of the institution. (Academic policies) 3.4.6 The institution employs sound and acceptable practices for determining the amount and level of credit awarded for courses, regardless of format or mode of delivery. (Practices for awarding credit) 3.4.7 The institution ensures the quality of educational programs and courses offered through consortial relationships or contractual agreements, ensures ongoing compliance with the Principles, and periodically evaluates the consortial relationship and/or agreement against the mission of the institution. (See Commission policy “Collaborative Academic Arrangements.”) (Consortial relationships/contractual agreements) 162 3.4.8 The institution awards academic credit for course work taken on a noncredit basis only when there is documentation that the noncredit course work is equivalent to a designated credit experience. (Noncredit to credit) 3.4.9 The institution provides appropriate academic support services. (Academic support services) 3.4.10 The institution places primary responsibility for the content, quality, and effectiveness of the curriculum with its faculty. (Responsibility for curriculum) 3.4.11 For each major in a degree program, the institution assigns responsibility for program coordination, as well as for curriculum development and review, to persons academically qualified in the field. In those degree programs for which the institution does not identify a major, this requirement applies to a curricular area or concentration. (Academic program coordination) 3.4.12 The institution’s use of technology enhances student learning and is appropriate for meeting the objectives of its programs. Students have access to and training in the use of technology. (Technology use) 3.5 Undergraduate Educational Programs 3.5.1 The institution identifies college-level general education competencies and the extent to which students have attained them. (General education competencies) 3.5.2 At least 25 percent of the credit hours required for the degree are earned through instruction offered by the institution awarding the degree. (See Commission policy “Collaborative Academic Arrangements.”) (Institutional credits for a degree) 3.5.3 The institution publishes requirements for its undergraduate programs, including its general education components. These requirements conform to commonly accepted standards and practices for degree programs. (See Commission policy “The Quality and Integrity of Undergraduate Degrees.”) (Undergraduate program requirements) 3.5.4 At least 25 percent of the course hours in each major at the baccalau- 163 reate level are taught by faculty members holding an appropriate terminal degree—usually the earned doctorate or the equivalent of the terminal degree. (Terminal degrees of faculty) 3.6 Graduate and Post-Baccalaureate Professional Programs 3.6.1 The institution’s post-baccalaureate professional degree programs, master’s and doctoral degree programs, are progressively more advanced in academic content than its undergraduate programs. (Post-baccalaureate program rigor) 3.6.2 The institution structures its graduate curricula (1) to include knowledge of the literature of the discipline and (2) to ensure ongoing student engagement in research and/or appropriate professional practice and training experiences. (Graduate curriculum) 3.6.3 At least one-third of credits toward a graduate or a post-baccalaureate professional degree are earned through instruction offered by the institution awarding the degree. (See Commission policy “Collaborative Academic Arrangements.”) (Institutional credits for a graduate degree) 3.6.4 The institution defines and publishes requirements for its graduate and post-baccalaureate professional programs. These requirements conform to commonly accepted standards and practices for degree programs. (Post-baccalaureate program requirements) 3.7 Faculty 3.7.1 The institution employs competent faculty members qualified to accomplish the mission and goals of the institution. When determining acceptable qualifications of its faculty, an institution gives primary consideration to the highest earned degree in the discipline. The institution also considers competence, effectiveness, and capacity, including, as appropriate, undergraduate and graduate degrees, related work experiences in the field, professional licensure and certifications, honors and awards, continuous documented excellence in teaching, or other demonstrated competencies and achievements that contribute to effective teaching and student learning outcomes. For all cases, the institution is responsible for justifying and documenting the qualifications of its faculty. (See Commission guidelines “Faculty Credentials.”) (Faculty competence) 164 3.7.2 The institution regularly evaluates the effectiveness of each faculty member in accord with published criteria, regardless of contractual or tenured status. (Faculty evaluation) 3.7.3 The institution provides ongoing professional development of faculty as teachers, scholars, and practitioners. (Faculty development) 3.7.4 The institution ensures adequate procedures for safeguarding and protecting academic freedom. (Academic freedom) 3.7.5 The institution publishes policies on the responsibility and authority of faculty in academic and governance matters. (Faculty role in governance) 3.8 Library and Other Learning Resources 3.8.1 The institution provides facilities and learning/information resources that are appropriate to support its teaching, research, and service mission. (Learning/information resources) 3.8.2 The institution ensures that users have access to regular and timely instruction in the use of the library and other learning/information resources. (Instruction of library use) 3.8.3 The institution provides a sufficient number of qualified staff— with appropriate education or experiences in library and/or other learning/information resources—to accomplish the mission of the institution. (Qualified staff) 3.9 Student Affairs and Services 3.9.1 The institution publishes a clear and appropriate statement of student rights and responsibilities and disseminates the statement to the campus community. (Student rights) 3.9.2 The institution protects the security, confidentiality, and integrity of student records and maintains security measures to protect and back up data. (Student records) 3.9.3 The institution provides a sufficient number of qualified staff—with appropriate education or experience in the student affairs area—to accomplish the mission of the institution. (Qualified staff) 165 RESOURCES 3.10 Financial Resources 3.10.1 The institution’s recent financial history demonstrates financial stability. (Financial stability) 3.10.2 The institution audits financial aid programs as required by federal and state regulations. (Financial aid audits) 3.10.3 The institution exercises appropriate control over all its financial resources. (Control of finances) 3.10.4 The institution maintains financial control over externally funded or sponsored research and programs. (Control of sponsored research/external funds) 3.11 Physical Resources 3.11.1 The institution exercises appropriate control over all its physical resources. (Control of physical resources) 3.11.2 The institution takes reasonable steps to provide a healthy, safe, and secure environment for all members of the campus community. (Institutional environment) 3.11.3 The institution operates and maintains physical facilities, both on and off campus, that appropriately serve the needs of the institution’s educational programs, support services, and other missionrelated activities. (Physical facilities) 166 INSTITUTIONAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR COMMISSION POLICIES 3.12 Responsibility for compliance with the Commission’s substantive change procedures and policy. The Commission on Colleges accredits the entire institution and its programs and services, wherever they are located or however they are delivered. Accreditation, specific to an institution, is based on conditions existing at the time of the most recent evaluation and is not transferable to other institutions or entities. When an accredited institution significantly modifies or expands its scope, changes the nature of its affiliation or its ownership, or merges with another institution, a substantive change review is required. The Commission is responsible for evaluating all substantive changes to assess the impact of the change on the institution’s compliance with defined standards. If an institution fails to follow the Commission’s procedures for notification and approval of substantive changes, its total accreditation may be placed in jeopardy. (See Commission policy “Substantive Change for Accredited Institutions.”) If an institution is unclear as to whether a change is substantive in nature, it should contact Commission staff for consultation. An applicant, candidate, or member institution in litigation with the Commission may not undergo substantive change. 3.12.1 The institution notifies the Commission of changes in accordance with the Commission’s substantive change policy and, when required, seeks approval prior to the initiation of changes. (Substantive change) 3.13 Responsibility for compliance with other Commission policies. The Commission’s philosophy of accreditation precludes denial of membership to a degree-granting institution of higher education on any ground other than an institution’s failure to meet the requirements of the Principles of Accreditation in the professional judgment of peer reviewers, or failure to comply with the policies of the Commission. (See Commission Web site for all current Commission policies: www.sacscoc.org.) 167 3.13.1 The institution complies with the policies of the Commission on Colleges. (Policy compliance) (Note: In the Compliance Certification, Fifth-Year Interim Report, and prospectus or application for substantive change, the institution will be required to address specific Commission policies.) 3.14 Representation of status with the Commission. The institution publishes the name of its primary accreditor and its address and phone number in accordance with federal requirements. Institutions should indicate that normal inquiries about the institution, such as admission requirements, financial aid, educational programs, etc., should be addressed directly to the institution and not to the Commission’s office. In such a publication or Web site, the institution should indicate that the Commission is to be contacted only if there is evidence that appears to support an institution’s significant non-compliance with a requirement or standard. The institution is expected to be accurate in reporting to the public its status with the Commission. In order to meet these requirements, the institution lists the name, address, and telephone number in its catalog or Web site using one of the following statements: (Name of member institution) is accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Commission on Colleges to award (name specific degree levels, such as associate, baccalaureate, masters, doctorate). Contact the Commission on Colleges at 1866 Southern Lane, Decatur, Georgia 30033-4097 or call 404-679-4500 for questions about the accreditation of (name of member institution). (Name of candidate institution) is a candidate for accreditation with the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Commission on Colleges to award (name specific degree levels, such as associate, baccalaureate, masters, doctorate). Contact the Commission on Colleges at 1866 Southern Lane, Decatur, Georgia 30033-4097 or call 404-679-4500 for questions about the status of (name of member institution). No statement may be made about the possible future accreditation status with the Commission on Colleges of the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools, nor may an institution use the logo or seal of the Southern Association in any of its publications or documents. 168 3.14.1 A member or candidate institution represents its accredited status accurately and publishes the name, address, and telephone number of the Commission in accordance with Commission requirements and federal policy. (Publication of accreditation status) 169 n SECTION 4: Federal Requirements 170 The U.S. Secretary of Education recognizes accreditation by SACS Commission on Colleges in establishing the eligibility of higher education institutions to participate in programs authorized under Title IV of the Higher Education Act, as amended, and other federal programs. Through its periodic review of institutions of higher education, the Commission assures the public that it is a reliable authority on the quality of education provided by its member institutions. The federal statute includes mandates that the Commission review an institution in accordance with criteria outlined in the federal regulations developed by the U.S. Department of Education. As part of the review process, institutions are required to document compliance with those criteria and the Commission is obligated to consider such compliance when the institution is reviewed for initial membership or continued accreditation. Implicit in every Federal Requirement mandating a policy or procedure is the expectation that the policy or procedure is in writing and has been approved through appropriate institutional processes, published in appropriate institutional documents accessible to those affected by the policy or procedure, and implemented and enforced by the institution. 4.1 The institution evaluates success with respect to student achievement consistent with its mission. Criteria may include: enrollment data; retention, graduation, course completion, and job placement rates; state licensing examinations; student portfolios; or other means of demonstrating achievement of goals. (Student achievement) 4.2 The institution’s curriculum is directly related and appropriate to the mission and goals of the institution and the diplomas, certificates, or degrees awarded. (Program curriculum) 4.3 The institution makes available to students and the public current academ- ic calendars, grading policies, and refund policies. (Publication of policies) 4.4 Program length is appropriate for each of the institution’s educational programs. (Program length) 4.5 The institution has adequate procedures for addressing written student complaints and is responsible for demonstrating that it follows those procedures when resolving student complaints. (See Commission policy “Complaint Procedures against the Commission or its Accredited Institutions.”) (Student complaints) 171 4.6 Recruitment materials and presentations accurately represent the institution’s practices and policies. (Recruitment materials) 4.7 The institution is in compliance with its program responsibilities under Title IV of the most recent Higher Education Act as amended. (In reviewing the institution’s compliance with these program responsibilities, the Commission relies on documentation forwarded to it by the U.S. Department of Education.) (Title IV program responsibilities) 4.8 An institution that offers distance or correspondence education documents each of the following: (Distance and correspondence education) 4.8.1 demonstrates that the student who registers in a distance or correspondence education course or program is the same student who participates in and completes the course or program and receives the credit by verifying the identity of a student who participates in class or coursework by using, at the option of the institution, methods such as (a) a secure login and pass code, (b) proctored examinations, or (c) new or other technologies and practices that are effective in verifying student identification. 4.8.2 has a written procedure for protecting the privacy of students enrolled in distance and correspondence education courses or programs. 4.8.3 has a written procedure distributed at the time of registration or enrollment that notifies students of any projected additional student charges associated with verification of student identity. 4.9 The institution has policies and procedures for determining the cred- it hours awarded for courses and programs that conform to commonly accepted practices in higher education and to Commission policy. (See Commission policy “Credit Hours.”). (Definition of credit hours) 172 n APPENDIX: Commission Policy, Guidelines, Good Practice Statements, and Position Statements 173 COMMISSION POLICIES Definition: A policy is a required course of action to be followed by the Commission on Colleges or its member or candidate institutions. Commission policies may also include procedures, which are likewise a required course of action to be followed by the Commission on Colleges or its member or candidate institutions. The Principles of Accreditation requires that an institution comply with the policies and procedures of the Commission. Policies are approved by vote of the Commission’s Board of Trustees. At its discretion, the Board may choose to forward a policy to the College Delegate Assembly for approval. Examples of policy topics include substantive change, standing rules, procedures for applicant institutions, special committee procedures, sanctions and adverse actions, appeals procedures, etc. All policies are available on the Commission’s Web page (www.sacscoc.org). The Commission maintains currency on the Web and reserves the right to add, modify, or delete any of the policies listed. COMMISSION GUIDELINES Definition: A guideline is an advisory statement designed to assist institutions in fulfilling accreditation requirements. As such, guidelines describe recommended educational practices for documenting requirements of the Principles of Accreditation and are approved by the Executive Council. The guidelines are examples of commonly accepted practices that constitute compliance with the standard. Depending upon the nature and mission of the institution, however, other approaches may be more appropriate and also provide evidence of compliance. Examples of guideline topics include advertising, student recruitment, contractual relationships, travel and committee visits, faculty credentials, etc. All guidelines are available on the Commission’s Web page (www.sacscoc.org). The Commission maintains currency on the Web and reserves the right to add, modify, or delete any of the guidelines listed. COMMISSION GOOD PRACTICES Definition: Good practices are commonly-accepted practices within the higher education community which enhance institutional quality. Good practices may be formulated by outside agencies and organizations and 174 endorsed by the Executive Council or the Commission’s Board of Trustees. Good practice documents are available on the Commission’s Web page (www.sacscoc.org). The Commission maintains currency on the Web and reserves the right to add, modify, or delete any of those listed. COMMISSION POSITION STATEMENTS Definition: A position statement examines an issue facing the Commission’s membership, describes appropriate approaches, and states the Commission’s stance on the issue. It is endorsed by the Executive Council or the Commission’s Board of Trustees. Position statements are available on the Commission’s Web page (www.sacscoc.org). The Commission maintains currency on the Web and reserves the right to add, modify, or delete any of those listed. 175 資料２ アクレディテーション 実施手続き Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Commission on Colleges 1866 Southern Lane Decatur, Georgia 30033-4097 ACCREDITATION PROCEDURES FOR APPLICANT INSTITUTIONS Policy Statement The Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Commission on Colleges (SACSCOC) is a regional accrediting agency which accredits institutions in Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, and Latin America that award associate, baccalaureate, master’s and/or doctoral degrees. The Commission also accepts a limited number of applications from international institutions of higher education. The Commission welcomes applications from institutions which are located in these areas and which are prepared to meet other qualifications for membership. The accreditation procedures outlined in this document apply to degree-granting institutions of higher education which wish to seek accreditation with SACSCOC. Formerly accredited members seeking to regain membership with the Commission must also follow these same procedures. The philosophy of accreditation by the Commission on Colleges precludes denial of membership to a degree-granting institution of higher education in its region on any basis other than failure to comply with the Core Requirements, the Comprehensive Standards, and the Federal Requirements of the Principles of Accreditation: Foundations for Quality Enhancement established by the College Delegate Assembly or failure to comply with the policies and procedures of the Commission. The Commission’s Board of Trustees uniformly applies the Principles to all applicant, candidate, and member institutions. Communication concerning membership should be addressed to the President of SACS Commission on Colleges. Applications and a copy of the Principles of Accreditation may be secured at the Commission’s website, www.sacscoc.org. The Application: Documentation of Compliance with the Core Requirements, Designated Sections of the Comprehensive Standards, and Federal Requirements of the Principles of Accreditation An institution seeking authorization of a Candidacy Committee must first complete an application documenting its compliance with Core Requirements 2.1–2.11, Comprehensive Standards 3.3.1, 3.5.1, and 3.7.1, and Federal Requirements 4.1-4.9. These requirements are basic expectations of institutions seeking Candidacy. Compliance with these requirements, however, is not sufficient to warrant initial membership. After gaining Candidacy status, institutions must demonstrate both continued compliance with the above requirements and compliance with all of the remaining Comprehensive Standards of the Principles of Accreditation. 176 Note Concerning Substantive Change An applying institution describes itself in its initial application with the Commission. Therefore, from the date of submission of an application to the date of the granting of membership, if an institution undertakes a substantive change, as defined by the Commission policy "Substantive Change for Accredited Institutions of the Commission on Colleges," it will have significant impact on the accreditation process. If an institution chooses to implement a substantive change after submitting an application, but prior to gaining authorization to receive a Candidacy Committee, the institution will be required to submit a new application which describes the change. If an institution implements a substantive change after it has been authorized to receive a Candidacy Committee but prior to the granting of Candidacy, its authorization may be revoked at the discretion of the Commission. If an institution implements a substantive change during its Candidacy period, the status of Candidacy may be revoked at the discretion of the Commission. Should Candidacy be revoked, the institution may reapply at any time. Note Concerning Documentation of Compliance with Core Requirement 2.11 In addition to providing narrative describing its compliance with Core Requirement 2.11.1, an institution must include with its application separate institutional audits and management letters for its three most recent fiscal years, including that for the fiscal year ending immediately prior to the date of submission of the application. The institution also must provide with the application an annual budget that is preceded by sound planning, is subject to sound fiscal procedures, and is approved by the governing board, and a schedule of changes in unrestricted net assets, excluding plant and plant related debt (short and long term debt attached to physical assets). Further, the institution must provide a separate audit and management letter for the most recent fiscal year ending prior to any committee visit for Candidacy, Candidacy renewal, or initial Membership. All audits must be conducted by independent certified public accountants or an appropriate governmental auditing agency. An applicant or Candidate institution must not show an annual or cumulative operating deficit at any time during the application process or at any time during Candidacy. (These documents are also required of member institutions and are referenced in Core Requirement 2.11.1). General Steps in the Process for Achieving Initial Membership 1. Attendance at a Workshop for Pre-Applicant Institutions An institution planning to submit an application must attend a one day workshop at the Commission offices. Information about the workshop can be obtained by calling or writing the Commission on Colleges or by visiting the Commission’s website. Institutions interested in understanding the process in order to determine whether to apply or not may also wish to attend a workshop. The workshop acquaints attendees with the accreditation process and with the Core Requirements, Comprehensive Standards, and Federal Requirements. 2. Submission of an Application by the Institution and Initial Review by the Commission An institution seeking membership must first submit an application describing the characteristics of the institution and documenting its compliance with Core Requirements 2.1-2.11, Comprehensive Standards 3.3.1, 3.5.1, and 3.7.1, and Federal Requirements 4.1-4.9. The application is initially reviewed by Commission staff and then by peer reviewers. 177 3. Authorization by the Commission of a Candidacy Committee When the Commission determines that the institution has demonstrated compliance with Core Requirements 2.1-2.11, Comprehensive Standards 3.3.1, 3.5.1, and 3.7.1, and Federal Requirements 4.1-4.9, it will authorize a Candidacy Committee to visit the institution. The Candidacy Committee verifies on site the documentation presented in the application and writes a report that is forwarded to the Committee on Compliance and Reports for review and consideration of Candidacy status for the institution. The institution has a minimum of two weeks to respond to the Candidacy Committee Report if it wishes to do so. If it responds to the report, the response will also be forwarded to the Committee on Compliance and Reports. If the Commission determines that the institution is not in compliance with any of the above requirements, it will deny authorization of a Candidacy Committee. Denial of authorization of a Candidacy Committee visit by the Commission is not appealable. The institution may submit a new application whenever it wishes. 4. Granting of Candidacy Status by the Commission The institution is granted Candidacy status upon recommendation of the Committee on Compliance and Reports and subsequent action by SACSCOC Board of Trustees indicating that the institution has demonstrated compliance with the requirements of the application and that this compliance has been verified by a Candidacy Committee which has visited the institution. Candidacy is effective on the date of SACSCOC Board of Trustee action to grant Candidacy. If Candidacy is denied, the institution must submit a new application along with application fees and must be authorized to receive another Candidacy Committee visit before being considered again for Candidacy. Denial of Candidacy is appealable. 5. Completion by the Institution of a Compliance Certification When Candidacy is granted, the institution must complete a Compliance Certification documenting continued compliance with Core Requirements 2.1-2.11, Comprehensive Standards 3.3.1, 3.5.1, and 3.7.1, and Federal Requirements 4.1-4.9 and must document compliance with the remainder of the Comprehensive Standards of the Principles of Accreditation and receive an Accreditation Committee visit within the two years following the date the institution was granted Candidacy status. The report of the Accreditation Committee and the institution’s response to the recommendations in that report are sent for review by the Commission’s Board of Trustees for one of the following actions: grant membership, continue the institution in Candidacy status for a maximum of two more years, or remove the institution from Candidacy. Removal from Candidacy is an appealable action. If the Appeals Committee’s final decision is to reverse the Board’s decision to remove the institution from Candidacy, the institution remains in Candidacy, receives another Accreditation Committee visit, and within two years is again considered for membership by the Commission. If the institution is granted continued Candidacy, an Accreditation Committee will again visit the institution within the next two years of Candidacy. The report of that Accreditation Committee and the institution’s response to that report will be sent to the Commission’s Board of Trustees for action either granting or denying membership. If the decision of the Board is to deny membership, the institution will be removed from Candidacy. This action is appealable. The institution may apply for membership immediately following the Board’s decision or, if the institution appeals the decision, after the Appeals Committee's final decision to drop the institution from Candidacy. If the Appeals Committee’s final decision is to reverse the Board of Trustee’s decision to remove the institution from Candidacy, the institution is granted membership status. 178 6. Granting by the Commission of Membership Status An institution which has been granted Candidate status is granted membership when the Commission’s Board of Trustees judges that the institution has complied with Core Requirements 2.1–2.11, has documented compliance with all of the Comprehensive Standards (except CS 3.3.2) and Federal Requirements of the Principles of Accreditation and has been in operation, i.e., has without interruption enrolled students in degree programs through at least one complete degree program cycle, and has graduated at least one class at the level of the highest degree offered by the institution prior to action of the Commission. There can be no substantial reliance on corrective actions to bring an institution into compliance after the institution is awarded accreditation. Membership is retroactive to January 1 of the year in which accreditation is awarded by the Commission. An institution is granted membership only for those purposes and programs in place at the time of initial accreditation. Before a member institution implements a substantive change, as defined by the Commission policy "Substantive Change for Accredited Institutions of the Commission on Colleges," it must report the change to the President of SACS Commission on Colleges. The institution's accreditation must be reaffirmed five years after it is granted initial membership. Prior to reaffirmation, the institution must submit for review by an Off Site Reaffirmation Committee a Compliance Certification documenting compliance with Core Requirements 2.1-2.11, all of the Comprehensive Standards (except CS 3.3.2), and the Federal Requirements of the Principles of Accreditation. It must also complete a Quality Enhancement Plan (Core Requirement 2.12 and Comprehensive Standard 3.3.2) for review during a visit by an On Site Reaffirmation Committee. Specific Procedures in the Process for Achieving Initial Membership 1. The institution secures an application for membership, a copy of the Principles of Accreditation, and other materials as well as information concerning the pre-applicant workshop by writing or calling the offices of the Commission on Colleges or by visiting the website of the Commission (www.sacscoc.org). 2. Representatives of the institution attend a workshop for pre-applicant institutions. 3. The institution provides all information requested in the Application Form. The completed Application constitutes a primary source of information used by the Commission on Colleges to determine apparent compliance with Core Requirements 2.1-2.11, Comprehensive Standards 3.3.1, 3.5.1, 3.7.1, and Federal Requirements 4.1-4.9. (See Note Concerning Documenting Compliance with Core Requirement 2.11.1 above.) 4. A staff member will review the completed Application Form and will provide the institution with a written assessment. If additional information is needed, the institution will be requested to provide it. If the staff member determines that the institution does not appear to comply with any or all of the requirements, the institution will be given a choice of withdrawing its application or requesting that it be referred to one of the Committees on Compliance and Reports (the review committees of SACSCOC Board of Trustees). Upon recommendation of the review committee, the Board of Trustees will then either deny authorization or authorize a Candidacy Committee visit. 179 If the staff member determines that the institution appears to be in compliance with the requirements, the President of SACS Commission can authorize the visit of a Candidacy Committee. This Candidacy Committee will consist of at least five members and will ascertain on site that the institution does meet Core Requirements 2.1–2.11, Comprehensive Standards 3.3.1, 3.5.1, and 3.7.1, and Federal Requirements 4.1-4.9. The application review process (beginning with receipt of the completed application and ending with authorization of the Candidacy Committee) normally can be accomplished within a period of twelve to eighteen months. The maximum period from the time the initial application is received by the Commission on Colleges to the time that the Candidacy Committee is authorized (either by the President of the Commission or the Committee on Compliance and Reports) should not exceed 18 months. Should the institution not receive authorization for a Candidacy Committee visit within 18 months after submitting its initial application materials, its application may be withdrawn at the discretion of the Commission. Should the institution wish to reapply at a future time, it will be required to submit a new application along with the appropriate application fee. After authorization, the visit of the Candidacy Committee and the subsequent decision of the Committee on Compliance and Reports may take as long as twelve months. 5. The Candidacy Committee, consisting of at least five members, will visit the institution to review documentation of compliance with Core Requirements 2.1–2.11, Comprehensive Standards 3.3.1, 3.5.1, and 3.7.1, and Federal Requirements 4.1-4.9. This Committee will write a report which will be forwarded to the Committee on Compliance and Reports. The institution may respond to the Candidacy Committee Report, and if it responds, the response will also be forwarded to the Committee on Compliance and Reports. Upon recommendation of the Committee on Compliance and Reports, the Commission, on the basis of the institution's application and the Candidacy Committee report and the institution’s response, will either grant Candidacy or deny Candidacy. 6. If the Commission denies Candidacy, the institution may appeal the action. If the appeal is denied, the institution may apply again at its discretion. 7. If the Commission grants Candidacy, the institution will be authorized to complete a Compliance Certification documenting continuing compliance with Core Requirements 2.1-2.11, Comprehensive Standards 3.3.1, 3.5.1, and 3.7.1, and Federal Requirements 4.1-4.9 and to document compliance with the remainder of the Comprehensive Standards and receive an Accreditation Committee visit. In order for the institution to maintain Candidacy status, this visit and subsequent action by the Commission’s Board of Trustees must occur within two years of the time that the institution is granted Candidacy. Prior to the institution’s completion of the Compliance Certification, the staff member assigned to the institution will visit it for the purpose of conducting an orientation to the process. An institution may be in Candidacy status for a maximum of four years with renewal at the two-year period. 8. After the institution completes a Compliance Certification, the institution will receive an Accreditation Committee visit. The chair of the Accreditation Committee will make a preliminary visit to the institution approximately two months in advance of the committee visit. 9. The Accreditation Committee will evaluate the extent of the institution’s compliance with the Principles of Accreditation and the institution’s potential for achieving accreditation. The Accreditation Committee report will be sent to the Commission staff member and to the institution. The chief executive officer of the institution will be invited to review the report and to prepare a written response to recommendations in 180 the report. The response must be submitted no later than the date requested for consideration at the next meetings of the Committees on Compliance and Reports and the Commission’s Board of Trustees. 10. The Accreditation Committee report, the institution's response to the report, and the chair's written review of the institution's response, will be reviewed by the Committee on Compliance and Reports. At that time, the institution may be invited to send representatives for a meeting on the record. (If an institution is in its fourth year of Candidacy, representatives from the institution will be invited for a meeting on the record.) The Committee on Compliance and Reports may recommend to the Commission that the institution be granted Continued Candidacy if the institution provides strong evidence that it is making adequate progress toward complying with the Principles of Accreditation and that it will fully comply with the Principles within four years despite the existence of issues of non-compliance cited by the Accreditation Committee. If an institution is granted Continued Candidacy, it will be visited again by an Accreditation Committee and considered by the Committee on Compliance and Reports within two years. In preparation for that committee visit, the institution will address issues of non-compliance cited by the first Accreditation Committee and will update information in its Compliance Certification. The Committee on Compliance and Reports will recommend membership if the institution has complied with Core Requirements 2.1–2.11, the Comprehensive Standards (except CS 3.3.2), and the Federal Requirements of the Principles of Accreditation. The Committee on Compliance and Reports will recommend removal from Candidacy if the institution has failed to comply with Core Requirements 2.1–2.11 and/or has failed to provide strong evidence that it is making adequate progress toward complying with the Comprehensive Standards and/or Federal Requirements of the Principles of Accreditation. An institution removed from Candidacy may submit another application at its discretion. Removal from Candidacy is appealable. 11. The Committee on Compliance and Reports makes recommendations concerning an institution’s status to the Executive Council of the Commission which, in turn, makes its recommendation to the Commission’s Board of Trustees which takes final action on the institution's status. 12. An institution may withdraw its application or its status as a Candidate institution at any time prior to the decision of the Commission’s Board of Trustees. If an institution withdraws its application and later decides to seek membership, it must submit a new application and follow the procedures outlined above as they apply to institutions seeking status with the Commission on Colleges. 13. It is the policy of the Commission on Colleges that an applying institution bears the following expenses: travel, meals, and lodging for members of a Candidacy Committee and members of all subsequent Accreditation Committees and the accompanying Commission staff representative; $200 to the chair and $100 to each Committee member for miscellaneous expenses incurred during the visit; and clerical expenses necessary for the chairs of committees to complete reports. The total cost of visits is billed to the institution by the Association following the visit. 181 Fees for Applicant and Candidate Institutions Because of staff and Commission involvement with applicant institutions beginning at the time an institution submits its application, the following fees apply: For national institutions: Application Fee Candidacy Fee $10,000 2,500 For international institutions: Application Fee Candidacy Fee $15,000 2,500 The Application Fee must accompany the application submitted by the institution. It covers costs associated with the application review and consultation with staff. When an institution is authorized to receive a Candidacy Committee, it is assessed a Candidacy Fee of $2,500. This fee covers costs associated with staff involvement in the accreditation process and assembling a Candidacy Committee. In addition, candidate and member institutions are assessed annual dues using a formula based on enrollment and on educational and general expenditures beginning with the term in which candidate or membership status is awarded. Document History Approved: Commission on Colleges, December 2002 Updated and Edited for the Principles of Accreditation: Commission on Colleges, December 2003 Updated: January 2007 Revised: Commission on Colleges, June 2008 Revised: Board of Trustees, January 2009 and July 2011 Edited: January 2012 182 資料３ アクレディテーション ハンドブック HANDBOOK FOR INSTITUTIONS SEEKING REAFFIRMATION Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Commission on Colleges 1866 Southern Lane Decatur, Georgia 30033-4097 404-679-4501 Ƈ www.sacscoc.org August 2011 edition 183 STATEMENT ON FAIR USE The Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Commission on Colleges, Inc., (SACSCOC) recognizes that for purposes of compliance with its standards, institutions and their representatives find it necessary from time to time to quote, copy, or otherwise reproduce short portions of its handbooks, Principles of Accreditation, and other publications for which SACSCOC has protection under the Copyright Statute. An express application of the Copyright Statute would require these institutions to seek advance permission for the use of these materials unless the use is deemed to be a “fair use” pursuant to 17 USC §107. This statement provides guidelines to institutions and their representatives as to what uses of these materials SACSCOC considers to be “fair use” so as not to require advance permission. SACSCOC considers quotation, copying, or other reproduction (including electronic reproduction) of short portions (not to exceed 250 words) of its handbooks, Principles of Accreditation, and other publications by institutions of higher education and their representatives for the purpose of compliance with SACSCOC’s standards to be fair use and not to require advance permission from SACSCOC. The number of copies of these quotations must be limited to ten. Representatives of institutions shall include employees of the institutions as well as independent contractors, such as attorneys, accountants, and consultants, advising the institution concerning compliance with SACSCOC’s standards. By providing these guidelines SACSCOC seeks to provide a workable balance between an express application of the Copyright Statute which may prove overly burdensome in some situations and the right of SACSCOC to protect its creative and economic interests. These guidelines, therefore, do not constitute a waiver of any rights SACSCOC may have under the Copyright Statute. 184 TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface ix Getting Started: Building a Foundation of Understanding I. An Overview of the Reaffirmation Process Types of Accrediting Agencies 3 3 Regional Agencies National Faith - Related Agencies National Career - Related Agencies Programmatic Agencies 3 3 3 3 Recognition of Accrediting Agencies 4 Southern Association of Colleges and Schools (SACS) 4 Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Commission on Colleges (SACSCOC) College Delegate Assembly (CDA) Appeals Committee of the College Delegate Assembly Board of Trustees (BOT) Executive Council (EC) Committees on Compliance and Reports (C & R) 5 6 6 6 6 7 SACSCOC Philosophy 7 Benefits of the Internal Institutional Analysis 8 Key SACSCOC Policies and Materials 9 The Principles of Accreditation Policies and Procedures Guidelines Good Practices Position Statements Forms Documents of the Reaffirmation Process Compliance Certification Institutional Summary Form Prepared for Commission Review Quality Enhancement Plan Focused Report 185 9 10 11 11 11 11 11 11 12 12 12 Institutional Profile 12 Steps in the Reaffirmation Process Phase 1: Phase 2: Phase 3: Phase 4: Preparation Off-Site Review On-Site Review Board of Trustee Review Timeline and Reporting Deadlines Responsibilities During the Reaffirmation Process Institutional Leadership Team Institutional Chief Executive Officer Institutional Accreditation Liaison Institutional Governing Board SACSCOC Staff SACSCOC Evaluation Committees SACSCOC Board of Trustees 12 13 13 13 14 14 15 16 17 17 17 17 18 19 Preparing for the Off-Site Review II. Compliance Certification 22 Leadership for Institutional Analysis of Compliance 22 Developing the Compliance Certification 23 Determining the Method of Submission Understanding the Standard Identifying the Compliance Components Reviewing Relevant Commission Policies Documenting Compliance Finding Documentation Evaluating Evidence Sampling Presenting Documentation Writing the Narrative Determining Compliance Building the Case for Compliance Finding the Right Length III. 24 24 24 25 26 26 27 28 28 29 29 30 30 Off-Site Review 32 Role of the Off-Site Reaffirmation Committee 32 Composition of the Off-Site Reaffirmation Committee 32 Materials for the Off-Site Review 33 Submission Requirements for Paper Compliance Certifications Submission Requirements for Electronic Compliance Certifications 186 33 33 Submission Requirements for All Institutions Report of the Off-Site Reaffirmation Committee Compliance Status Narrative 34 34 34 35 Preparing for the On-Site Review IV. Focused Report and the Quality Enhancement Plan Focused Report 38 Compliance Issues Cited for Further Review USDE Issues Quality Enhancement Plan 38 39 39 Leadership for Institutional Development of the QEP Institutional Support Developing the Quality Enhancement Plan: Suggested Steps Step One: Selecting a Topic Sources of Inspiration Scope Step Two: Defining the Student Learning Outcomes Step Three: Researching the Topic Step Four: Identifying the Actions to be Implemented Step Five: Establishing the Timeline for Implementation Step Six: Organizing for Success Step Seven: Identifying Necessary Resources Step Eight: Assessing the Success of the QEP Step Nine: Preparing the QEP for Submission V. 38 On-Site Review 40 41 41 42 43 43 44 45 46 46 47 47 48 48 51 Role of the On-Site Reaffirmation Committee Completing the Review of the Compliance Certification Addressing the Quality Enhancement Plan Visiting Off-Campus Sites Reviewing Third-Party Comments Conducting the Exit Conference 51 51 52 52 52 52 Composition of the On-Site Reaffirmation Committee 53 Materials for the On-Site Review 54 Hosting the On-Site Review 55 Transportation Hotel Accommodations Campus Accommodations Dining 55 55 56 56 187 Billing Procedures 57 Daily Schedule for the On-Site Review Day One Day Two Day Three 57 58 58 58 Report of the Reaffirmation Committee 59 Exit Conference 60 Completing the Reaffirmation Process VI. Review by the SACSCOC Board of Trustees Role of the Evaluators 64 64 Committees on Compliance and Reports Executive Council Board of Trustees Materials for Review by the Board of Trustees Report of the Reaffirmation Committee Chair’s evaluation of Institution’s Response Report Response to the Visiting Committee Report Quality Enhancement Plan Record of the Board of Trustee’s Action Immediate Follow-Up QEP Executive Summary Monitoring Reports Fifth-Year Interim Report Fifth-Year Compliance Certification (Part III) Additional Report (Part IV) Impact Report of the Quality Enhancement Plan (Part V) Visits to Off-Campus Sites Review by the Board of Trustees Appendix 64 65 65 65 65 65 65 66 66 67 67 67 68 68 69 69 69 69 72 Compliance Certification: II-1 II-2 II-3 II-4 Compliance Components Standards that Cross-Reference Commission Policies Compliance Certification Narrative: Example Asserting Compliance Compliance Certification Narrative: Example Asserting Partial Compliance 188 73 97 98 99 II-5 Compliance Certification Narrative: Example Marked Non-Compliance 100 Off-Site Review: III-1 III-2 Distribution Matrix for Off-Site Review Materials Examples of Off-Site Report Narratives 101 102 Quality Enhancement Plan: IV-1 Institutional Feedback: Developing the QEP 104 On-Site Review: V-1 V-2 Report of the Reaffirmation Committee: Sample Narratives QEP Recommendations and QEP Consultative Advice 106 108 Review by the Commission: VI-1 Sample Action Letters 110 Glossary and Reference Guide 115 189 ᖹᡂ ᖺᗘ ㄆドホ౯㛵ࡍࡿㄪᰝ◊✲ ᖹᡂ 24 ᖺ 7 ᭶ Ⓨ⾜ බ┈㈈ᅋἲே᪥ᮏ㧗➼ᩍ⫱ホ౯ᶵᵓ ࠛ102-0073 ᮾி㒔༓௦⏣༊ẁ 4-2-11 ➨ 2 ᫍගࣅࣝ 2 㝵 TEL 03-5211-5131 FAX 03-5211-5132 URL http://www.jihee.or.jp/