Kobe University Repository

Kobe University Repository : Thesis
学位論文題目
Title
カント倫理学における「目的」概念の諸相
氏名
Author
李, 明哲
専攻分野
Degree
博士（学術）
学位授与の日付
Date of Degree
2014-03-25
公開日
Date of Publication
2015-03-01
資源タイプ
Resource Type
Thesis or Dissertation / 学位論文
報告番号
Report Number
甲第6016号
URL
http://www.lib.kobe-u.ac.jp/handle_kernel/D1006016
※当コンテンツは神戸大学の学術成果です。無断複製・不正使用等を禁じます。
著作権法で認められている範囲内で、適切にご利用ください。
Create Date: 2017-03-30
25
12
10
......................................................................................... 3
......................................................................................... 4
................. 9
......................................................................................... 9
......................... 10
..................................... 15
........................................................................................ 18
.......... 20
........................................................................................ 20
......................................................................... 21
.............................................. 22
.............................................. 23
..................................... 25
.......... 27
........................................................................................ 28
.................. 30
........................................................................................ 30
.......................... 31
.................................................... 33
................................................. 34
........................................................................................ 36
............................................................................. 37
........................................................................................ 37
................................................. 38
.............................................. 40
................................................. 44
1
............................... 46
Teleologie
Zwecklehre— ............................. 50
................... 53
........................................................................................ 54
natura ectypa
............................................................................. 55
............................................................................... 55
......................................................................... 56
.............................................. 57
.................................................... 62
.................................................... 65
................................................. 73
........................................................................................ 79
....................................................................................... 80
....................................................................................... 83
.................................................................................... 84
2
BB
Bemerkungen zu den Beobachtungen über das Gefühl des Schönen und
Erhabenen (1842)
DGTM: Untersuchung über die Deutlichkeit der Grundsätze der natürlichen
Theologie und der Moral (1764)
G: Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten (1785)
GP
Über den Gebrauch teleologischer Principien in der Philosophie (1788)
NF: Naturrecht Feyerabend (1784)
KpV: Kritik der praktischen Vernunft (1788)
KU
Kritik der Urteilskraft (1790)
MC: Moralphilosophie Collins(Nachschriften) (1770's)
ML
Metaphysik L (1775
80)
L1
MS
Die Metaphysik der Sitten (1797)
Rel
Die Religion innerhalb der Grenzen der bloßen Vernunft (1793)
A/B
Kritik der reinen Vernunft (1781/1787)
3
1
2
Pflichtmäßig
G,
aus Pflicht
397
Ethik
1
387-8
Sittenlehre
Rechtslehre
Tugendlehre
MS,
379
2
4
3
4
5
6
Materie
KpV,
30
KpV,
31
3
4
1997,
p.110-111
5
homo noumenon
X
homo phaenomenon
1954, p.14-18
Cf.
1998,p.378;
6
F.Schiller, Über die Grundlage der Morals,
./
p.148
Cf.
1996, p.148
5
G,
431
7
8
G,
436
9
G,
440
7
G,
421
8
G,
429
9
Mill(2008) [1863], p.134
Beck1960, p.158/
p.373
Cf. G
438
(Hare, 1993)
(Rawls, 1989)
6
.
Zweck an sich
Willkür
EndZweck
KU,
434
7
KpV,
108
höchste Gut
8
10
(KpV,
67)
11
10
Cf.
2011, p.46;
2009, p.76-7
(Rawls,
11
1989)
(Hare, 1993)
9
G,
G,
412
413
G,
414
ibid.
ibid.
G,
420
ibid.
G,
420f.
G,
421
10
G,
421
G,
G,
424
402
ibid.
G,
424
ibid.
(G,
424)
…
425
ibid.
ibid.
426
…
426f.
11
12
G,
429
G,
G,
427
428
ibid.
G,
G,
428
437
confer
13
12
13
2011, p.33-9
Korsgaard 1996, pp.128-131
12
14
15
G,
437
ibid.
ibid.
ibid.
selbstständiger Zweck
ibid.
16
ibid.
ibid.
17
18
G,
429
ibid.
14
15
Wood 2008, pp.90-3
Cf.
2011, p.38
16
17
18
2002
Dean 2006 ; Kersteins 2006
Cf. Sensen, 2011, pp.87-95
13
Wollen
G,
Sollen
429
ibid.
1784
NF1321
19
20
19
20
Guyer 2000, pp.152-7; Sensen 2011, p.102
2004, p.258
14
G,
431
21
G,
412
G,
440
21
G,
432
15
G,
447
ibid.
G,
449
G,
450
ibid.
(ibid.)
G,
450
G,
G,
452
452
16
G,
ibid.
G,
22
454
G,
versetzen
453
455
sich
ibid.
ibid.
ibid.
Wollen
Sollen
G,
451
G,
455
…
G,
458
ibid.
ibid.
22
KpV,
43
17
G,
455
hinein denken
G,
458
ibid.
ibid.
23
23
Timmerman 2006, p.86
18
G,
401
19
1785
G,
wollen
449
sollen
(ibid)
wollen
sollen
Sollen
Wollen
G,
G,
454
455
Gefühl der Achtung
KpV,
G,
76
401
20
G,
G,
400f.
401
ibid.
24
G,
431
1788
KpV,
76
24
21
KpV,
72
(Eigenliebe)
(Eigendünkel)
KpV,
73
(Demüthigung)
KpV,
74
ibid.
KpV,
75
22
KpV,
75
(intellectuelle verachtung)
KpV,
78f.
durch Demüthigung
KpV,
79
23
G,
400
KpV,
76
KpV,
77
ibid.
25
ibid.
26
25
Beispiel
MS,
Beispiel
Cf.
Exempel
479
Exemple
MS,
479f.
2001
26
BB,
44
24
KpV,
78
KpV,
Persönlichkeit
Person
27
KpV,
KpV,
77
87
87
KpV,
27
; Cf.
2001, p.150-1
1952, pp.48-52
25
88
28
ibid.
pathologisch
ibid.
KpV,
87
KpV,
KpV,
77
88
KpV,
87
29
28
Menschlichkeit
Cf.
Anlagen
Rel,
Persönlichkeit
2001 p.123
1952
p53
28
29
1962, p.386
1962, p58
26
humilitas spuria
Demuth
MS,
435f.
KpV,
88
ibid.
Zweck an sich
KpV,
87
ibid.
ibid.
30
30
429
27
G,
Triebfeder
428
Bewegungsgrund
G,
428
31
G,
428
32
Rel,
28
31
2002 pp.135-9
32
1976
28
Rel,
27
29
G,
400
ibid.
G,
400 f.
1764
DGTM,
300
1770
30
MC,
274-5
1785
KpV,
G,
460
G,
442
71
KpV,
KpV,
72
78
31
33
G,
401
KpV,
71
34
35
36
G,
400
37
33
Beck 1960, p.222-3/
p.269-70
34
Beck 1960, pp.168-9/
2013
p.205-6
pp.81-2
Schönecker
validity
35
36
37
Schönecker2013, pp.21-6
Reath2006, pp.12-13
Aliison1990, pp.126-7
2010, p.315
32
(Triebfeder)
1770
38
MC,
274
Richtschnur
(Triebfeder)
ibid.
MC,
275
39
G,
ibid.
401
40
1770
20
38
39
Cf. Henrich 2001,
pp.33-42;
2010, p.311
40
Triebfeder
G,
G,
Bewegungsgrund
427
460
Cf,
1981, p.78
33
KpV,
81
ibid.
41
KpV,
76
KpV,
76
ibid.
41
2010
pp.315-7
34
ibid.
42
(Maxime)
KpV,
MC,
79
345
G,
421
43
Rel,
36
44
42
G,
420 1
20
43
pp.626-7
44
2011
p.164
2011 pp.171-3
35
KpV,
19
36
Gesinnung
45
45
Gesinnung
Cf. G,
435
37
G,
400
Typik
(
)
praktische Urteilskraft
KpV,
46
Regel
46
68
Gesetz der Freiheit
67
KpV,
Grundsätze
38
Typus
(KpV
69)
Maxim
Gesetzmäßigkeit
47
Zweckmäßigkeit
47
KpV,
68
KU,
352
39
H J
L W
48
49
50
51
48
49
50
51
Beck 1960, p.160/ p.198
Beck 1960, p.161 / p.199
18
Beck1960, p159 /
Cf. Paton 1947, p.161 /
p.373
70
p.238
40
52
53
54
55
G,
G,
429
434
G,
438
52
G,
421
53
(G,
69)
54
G,
55
1972
429
p.380
41
56
G,
436
57
58
59
1990
p.174
56
1972
p.374
57
58
1972
p.380
59
1972
p.382
42
KpV,
19
60
KpV,
113/
1990
p.175
61
60
61
43
Grundsätze
―
Regel
―
KpV,
19
62
KpV,
25f.
Wille
Willkür63
MS ,
213
64
ibid.
ibid.
arbitrium brutum
MS,
liberum arbitirium
213
ibid.
ibid.
65
62
1972
63
Willkür
p.244
Wille, Willkür
64
Wille
65
1770
brutum
humanum
ML1 ,
255
intellectualle
pathologisch
sinnlich
44
MS,
214
―
―
66
Wille
–
–
66
–
–
1994, p.90-127
45
–
–
KpV,
34
Materie
MS,
381
46
67
Rechtslehre
Tugendlehre
MS,
214
ibid.
MS,
219
ibid.
ibid.
pacta sunt servanda
MS,
220
ibid.
ibid.
MS,
219
Materie
67
KpV,
21-2
47
MS,
239
MS,
381
ibid.
68
MS,
MS,
381
220
68
MS,
381f.
48
MS,
383
ibid.
―
MS,
MS,
MS,
410
383
410
49
MS,
Teleologie
410
Zwecklehre
Teleologie69
Zwecklehre
Teleologie
physische Teleologie
KU,
455
moralische Teleologie
KU,
69
447f.
teleologische
Urteilskraft
50
KU,
434
ibid.
moralische Teleologie
moralische Teleologie
KU,
437
70
Zwecklehre
Zwecklehre
KU,
MS,
455
385
70
51
pragmatische
ibid.
moralische
ibid.
Zwecklehre
MS,
ibid.
MS,
385
71
217
72
Sittenlehre
71
Rechtslehre
MS,
philosophia moralis
Tugendlehre
379
72
2011
52
MS,
218
MS,
385
MS,
385
MS,
387
MS
407
MS,
388
ibid.
53
54
natura ectypa
höchste Gut
73
74
H.
75
L.W.
76
73
1962, p.292-3
74
Cohen1910, p.352
bonum consummatum
75
bonum supremum
1975, p.53-4
76
Beck1960, p.245/
p.294
55
77
Glückseligkeit
Ausdruck
KpV,
125
78
KpV,
108
77
78
Cf.
Beck1960, p.244/
p.293
1996,p.44-5; Silber1963, pp.110-2; Wike2010,
p.532
56
.
KpV,
110
ibid.
ibid.
KpV,
119
57
KpV,
112
KpV,
113
79
ibid.
ibid.
ibid.
80
ibid.
KpV,
114
79
2009, p.175
80
KpV,
26
58
KpV,
KpV,
115
81
119
ibid.
.
KpV,
122
ibid.
ibid.
ibid.
KpV,
81
Beck1960, p.268-9/ p.320
59
123
82
ibid.
KpV,
124
KpV,
122
Heiligkeit
Tugend
KpV,
KpV,
124
125
ibid.
ibid.
82
Beck1960, p.268-9/
p.320
60
KpV,
125
83
KpV,
126
A811/B839
A810/B838
83
126
ibid.
61
.
62
84
Maximal concept
judicial concept
KpV,
KpV,
123
115
85
.
J.
84
85
Beck1960, p.244f / p.293f
Beck1960, p.270 / p.322
63
transcendent
86
immanent
87
regulative
constitutive
88
89
90
86
Silber1959, p.478-9
87
88
ratio cognoscendi
Silber1959, p.486
ratio essendi
KpV,
89
Murphy1965
Zeldin1971
1996 1998
90
Silber1959, p.487
64
4-1.
urbildliche
nachgebildete
natura archetypa
natura ectypa
KpV,
43
die mögliche Wirkung
Gegenbild
65
KpV,
43
Typus
KpV,
70
91
92
ibid.
4-2.
91
KpV,
68
KU,
352
Cf.
1996, pp.158-165
92
KpV,
69
66
T.
93
standard
94
Typus
95
consummatum
c
ectypa natura
e
c
e
96
c
c
97
e
c
V.
93
94
95
96
97
"The Unimportance of Kant's Highest Good"
"The Importance of the Highest Good in Kant's Ethics "
Auxter1979
Silber1959, p.489
Auxter1979, p.124-5
Auxter1979, pp.127-8
Auxter1979, p.132
67
98
KpV,
KpV,
32
33
ibid.
KpV,
128
99
100
101
98
Wike2010, pp.527-8
99
MS,
383
100
101
Wike2010, p.532-3.
Rel, 101
Wike2010, p.531
ibid.
68
KpV,
129
102
102
Wike2010, p.532
KpV,
108
Beck1960, p. 244/
p.293
69
103
4-3.
G,
453
104
KpV,
128
1998,
p.99-106
103
intelligible Welt
104
intellektuell Welt
Verstandes Welt
70
KpV,
43
angemessenen
ibid.
KpV,
61
ibid.
KpV,
110
71
KpV,
115
105
123
61
106
105
106
72
110
KpV,
115
130
1788
GP,
159
ibid.
5-1.
1998, pp.85-88
73
nexus effectivus
nexus finalis
KU,
Natur Zweck
373f.
107
KU,
370
ibid.
letzte Zweck der Natur
KU,
427
108
Endzweck
KU,
Kultur
431
109
ibid.
KU,
KU,
434
436
ibid.
107
KU,
373
KU,
374
108
KU,
109
427
Kultur
KU,
430-1
74
5-2.
Physikotheologie
110
Moraltheologie
KU,
437
ibid.
KU,
443
ibid.
ibid.
KU,
444
ibid.
110
Physikotheologie
Physikotheologie
9
natürliche Theologie
physikotheologie
Moraltheologie
p.279
cf. ibid. p.282; B659
75
5-3.
KU,
448
KU,
KU,
KU,
449
450
434
KU,
450
das höchste durch Freiheit mögliche Gut in der Welt
KU,
443
76
KU,
450
111
KU,
413
KU,
451
5-4.
KU,
455
5-3
5-2
111
1996
pp.130-4
77
ibid.
KU,
451
ibid.
ibid.
das Weltbeste
KU,
KpV,
453
123
überzeugen
KU,
461
KU,
112
451
112
überreden
KU,
überzeugen
461
78
natura archtypa
natura ectypa
79
80
ratio essendi
ratio cogoscendi
GP,
Rel,
KpV,
4
KpV,
6
182
7
81
MS,
385
KpV,
131
82
72
25
2013
2013
2013
23
2011
83
1997
1998
2003
37
pp.133-158
2006
-
56
-
pp.45-56
1972
2013
43
pp.80-90
1952
p47-66
1981
3-4
pp.65-80
1980
2009
1996
26
pp.36-47
1998
pp.105-129
1975
1924
1976
64
pp.39-57
2001
18
pp.63-75
(2009)
KURENAI
-18
p.65–78
1994
2011
12
84
pp.159-176
2001
1997
1990
1996
(2002)
38
pp. 131-147
————(2004)
55
pp.256-267
2011
―
40
―
pp.29-46
2010
61
pp.309-320
(2011)
53
pp.25-51
1962
Allison, H. (1990), Kant's theory of freedom, Cambridge UP
Auxter, T. (1979), "The Unimportance of Kant's Highest Good, Journal of the
history of philosophy, vol. 1, pp.121-134, University of California Press
Beck, L. (1960), A Commentary on Kant’s Critique of Practical Reason, Chicago
1985
Cohen. H. (1910), Kant's Begründung der Ethik nebst ihren Anwendung auf Recht,
Religion und Geschichte, Berlin : Cassirer
Dean, R. (2006), The Value of Humanity in Kant's Moral Theory, Oxford: Clarendon
Press.
Guyer, P. (2000), Kant on Freedom, Law, and Happiness, Cambridge UP.
Hare, R. (1997), Sorting out Ethics, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Henrich, D. (2001), "Ethik der Autonomie", in Selbstverhältnisse, Reclam, pp.6-56
Kerstein, S. (2006), "Deriving the Formula of Humanity", in: Horn C. and
85
Schönecker, D.
eds.
, Kant's Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals: New
Interpretations, Berlin, de Gruyter, pp.200-221.
Korsgaard, C. (1996), Creating the Kingdom of Ends, Cambridge UP.
Mill, J. (2008) [1863], Utilitarianism in On Liberty and Other Essays (Oxford
World's Classics), Oxford UP, 2008.
Murphy, J. (1965), The Highest Good as Content for Kant's ethical Formalism, in
Kant-Studien, Bd.56, S.102-120
H. J. Paton, The Categorical Imperative, A Study in Kant’s Moral Philosophy,
London, 1947
1986
Rawls, J. (1989), "Themes in Kant's Moral Philosophy", in: Eckart, F. (ed.), Kant's
Transcendental Deductions, Stanford UP.
Sensen, O. (2011), Kant on Human Dignity, Berlin/Boston, de Gruyter.
Timmerman, J. (2006). "Value without Regress: Kant's 'Formula of Humanity'
Revisited", in: European Journal of Philosophy, 14, p.69-93
(2007), Kant's Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, A Critical
Guide, Cambridge UP.
Reath, A. (2006), Agency and Autonomy in Kant's Moral Theory, Oxford UP
Schönecker, D. (2013), "Kant's Moral Intuitionism: The Fact of Reason and Moral
Predispositions", in Kantstudiesonline2013, pp.1-38
Silber, J. (1959), "Kant's Conception of the Highest Good as Immanent and
Transcendent", The Philosophical Review, vol.68, No.4, pp.469-492, Duke
University Press
(1963). "The Importance of the Highest Good in Kant's Ethics", Ethics,
vol.73, No.3, pp.179-197, University of California Press
Wike, V. and Showler, R. (2010), "Kant's Concept of the Highest Good and
Archetype-Ectype Distinction, J Value Inquiry, vol.44, pp.521-533
Wood, A. (2008), Kantian Ethics, Cambridge UP
Yovel, Y. (1980), Kant and Philosophy of History, Princeton UP
Zeldin, M. (1971), The Summum Bonum, the Moral Law, and the Existence of God,
in Kant-Stdien, Bd.62, S. 43-54
86