研究資料 - 立命館大学

Impact of Exercise Intensity and Duration
on Postexercise Executive Function
Hayato Tsukamoto1,2, Saki Takenaka1, Tadashi Suga1, Daichi Tanaka1, Tatsuya Takeuchi1,
Takafumi Hamaoka3, Tadao Isaka1, and Takeshi Hashimoto1
Graduate School of Sport and Health Science, Ritsumeikan University, Shiga, Japan
Research fellow DC1 of the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Tokyo, Japan
3 School of Medicine, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
1
2
1,2,
1,
3,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1
1
2
DC1
3
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise [Epub ahead of print]
DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001155
(c) 2016 American College of Sports Medicine
2016 11 11
Med Sci Sports Exerc.
!
!
!
!
ACSM
AHA
!
Monsell S. Trends Cogn Sci, 2003.
!
!
!→!
!
Byun K et al. Neuroimage. 2014
Lucas SJ et al. Exp Gerontol. 2012
↓
20
30%
2
2
60%
30%
40
! 
! 
20
!
!
!
!
-
50 min
10 min
2 peak
Rest
Rest
.
arm
up
arm
up
arm
up
.
60% VO2 peak
.
60% VO2 peak for 40 min
for 10 min
for 20 min
C W S T ( 30 min )
. JR. J Exp Psychol. 1935
Color-word Stroop task; CWST Stroop
60% VO
C W S T ( 20 min )
CWST ( Pre )
MI40
10 min
Post-exercise recovery
B. Study 2
MI10
MI20
10 min
C W S T ( 30 min )
.
30% VO2 peak for 40 min
Warm
up
C W S T ( 20 min )
arm
up
60% VO2 peak for 20 min
C W S T ( 10 min )
.
.
Rest
.
30% VO2 peak for 20 min
C W S T ( 10 min )
LI40
arm
up
Rest
C W S T ( 0 min )
MI20
Figure 1. (A)
23.2 ± 0.5
C W S T ( 0 min )
LI20
CWST ( Pre )
A. Study 1
12
Executive function
Nega%ve 18
Interference score, %
LI20
Posi%ve
Figure 2. (A)
LI40
MI20
†‡§
12
*
†‡§
‡b
*
6
*
Pre
2
MI20
P < 0.01 vs. Pre
P < 0.01 vs. Post 0-min
‡ P < 0.01 vs. Post 10-min
§ P < 0.01 vs. Post 20-min
a P < 0.017 vs. LI
20
b P < 0.017 vs. MI
20
†
*
*a
*
LI20 vs. MI20 P < 0.017
MI20 vs. LI40 P < 0.017
Recovery
EX
0
*
0
10
20
30 min
2
!
!
→
10
!
45
20
Chang YK et al. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2015
60%
! 
10
!
20
1/
2
2
40
MI40
15
10 min
.
60% VO2 peak
arm
up
.
arm
up
Rest
.
arm
up
60% VO2 peak for 40 min
50 min
for 10 min
60% VO2 peak for 20 min
.
10 min
10 min
C
C
C
10 min
Post-exercise
recovery
Figure
1. (B)
22.6 ± 0.4
Rest
10 min
10 min
Post-exercise recovery
C W S T ( 30 min )
MI20
50 min
C W S T ( 20 min )
MI10
CWST ( Pre )
B. Study 2
30% VO2 peak for 40 min
C W S T ( 10 min )
-
.
C
Warm
up
C W S T ( 0 min )
C
LI40
Executive function
Nega%ve
20
Interference score, %
MI10
MI40
MI20
15
10
Cohen’s d = 0.68
MI40
5
0
Pre
*
Recovery
EX
Pre
*
Immediately after
0
Post10
10
Post20
20
†‡§
*
P < 0.01 vs. Pre
P < 0.01 vs. Post 0-min
‡ P < 0.01 vs. Post 10-min
30 min § P < 0.01 vs. Post 20-min
†
Post30
40
MI
0
MI10, Cohen’s d = 0.30
MI20, Cohen’s d = 0.31
*
Posi%ve
Figure 3. (A)
20
30%
2
2
60%
30%
40
20
60%
1/
2
2
60%
10
40
same workload
Executive
function
Executive function
6
6
5
5
90%
4
3
2
Short
Short
Long
(40
min)
Long
(40
min)
1
0
Moderate
Moderate
Moderate
(20
Moderate
(20min)
min)
Low
w
(30% . Low
M
Mood.deerraate
VOLow
22 peak
ak)) (6
.
te
(600%
Middle
Middle
%
VVOO22pe
peaakk) )
Inten
nssiittyy
Long
Long
Short
(10
Short
(10min)
min)
Duration
Duration
High-intensity interval exercise
.
4sets ×
90% VO
. 2 peak for 4 min
60% VO2 peak for 3 min
Tsukamoto H et al. Physiol Behav. 2016
→
!
!
!
30
!
Colcombe et al. Psychol Sci. 2003
!
!
!
! 
E-mail: [email protected]
! 
E-mail: [email protected]
! 
E-mail: [email protected]
525-8577
1-1-1
Tel: 077-561-3760, FAX: 077-561-3761