Psychology and rehabilitation of patients with CHD
by taratuta
Comments
Transcript
Psychology and rehabilitation of patients with CHD
Page 377 Black blue OBESITY AND CORONARY HEART DISEASE 377 cope with stressful situations. Kaluza (2000) evaluated an intervention designed to change the coping profiles of 82 healthy working men and women. The intervention lasted for 12 weeks and focused on assertiveness, cognitive restructuring, time management, relaxation, physical activities and the scheduling of pleasant activities. Changes were compared to a control group who received no intervention. The results showed significant improvements in emotion focused coping and problem focused coping which were related to the individual’s original coping profiles. In particular, those who were originally more problem focused became more emotion focused and those who were more avoidant copers became more problem focused. The authors suggest that the intervention changed unbalanced coping profiles. In addition, these changes were related to improvements in aspects of well-being. Psychology and rehabilitation of patients with CHD Psychology also plays a role in the rehabilitation of individuals who have been diagnosed with CHD either in terms of angina, atherosclerosis or who have suffered a heart attack. Rehabilitation programmes use a range of techniques including health education, relaxation training and counselling and have been developed to encourage CHD sufferers to modify their risk factors, such as exercise, type A behaviour, general lifestyle factors and stress. Modifying exercise Most rehabilitation programmes emphasize the restoration of physical functioning through exercise with the assumption that physical recovery will in turn promote psychological and social recovery. Meta-analyses of these exercise-based programmes have suggested that they may have favourable effects on cardiovascular mortality (e.g. Oldridge et al. 1988). However, such meta-analyses are problematic as there is a trend towards publishing positive results, thereby influencing the overall picture. In addition, whether these exercise-based programmes influence risk factors other than exercise, such as smoking, diet and type A behaviour, is questionable. Modifying type A behaviour The recurrent coronary prevention project was developed by Friedman et al. (1986) in an attempt to modify type A behaviour. This programme was based on the following questions: Can type A behaviour be modified? If so, can such modification reduce the chances of a re-occurrence of a heart attack? The study involved 1000 subjects and a five-year intervention. Subjects had all suffered a heart attack and were allocated to one of three groups: cardiology counselling, type A behaviour modification or no treatment. Type A behaviour modification involved discussions of the beliefs and values of type A, discussing methods of reducing work demands, relaxation and education about changing the cognitive framework of the individuals. At five years, the results showed that the type A modification group showed a reduced re-occurrence of heart attacks, suggesting that not only can type A behaviour be modified but that when modified there Page 377 Black blue Page 378 Black blue 378 HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY may be a reduction of reinfarction. However, the relationship between type A behaviour and CHD is still controversial, with recent discussions suggesting that type A may at times be protective against CHD. Modifying general lifestyle factors In addition, rehabilitation programmes have been developed which focus on modifying other risk factors such as smoking and diet. For example, van Elderen et al. (1994) developed a health education and counselling programme for patients with cardiovascular disease after hospitalization, with weekly follow-ups by telephone. Thirty CHD sufferers and their partners were offered the intervention and were compared with a group of 30 control patients who received standard medical care only. The results showed that after two months, the patients who had received health education and counselling reported a greater increase in physical activity and a greater decrease in unhealthy eating habits. In addition, within those subjects in the experimental condition (receiving health education and counselling), those whose partners had also participated in the programme showed greater improvements in their activity and diet and, in addition, showed a decrease in their smoking behaviour. At 12 months, subjects who had participated in the health education and counselling programme maintained their improvement in their eating behaviour. The authors concluded that, although this study involved only a small number of patients, the results provide some support for including health education and counselling in rehabilitation programmes. More recently, however, van Elderen and Dusseldorp (2001) reported results from a similar study which produced more contradictory results. They explored the relative impact of providing health education, psychological input and standard medical care and physical training to patients with CHD and their partners after discharge from hospital. Overall, all patients improved their lifestyle during the first three months and showed extra improvement in their eating habits over the next nine months. However, by one year follow-up many patients had increased their smoking again and returned to their sedentary lifestyles. In terms of the relative effects of the different forms of interventions the results were more complex than the authors’ earlier work. Although health education and the psychological intervention had an improved impact on eating habits over standard medical care and physical training, some changes in lifestyle were more pronounced in the patients who had only received the latter. For example, receiving health education and psychological intervention seemed to make it more difficult to quit a sedentary lifestyle and receiving health education seemed to make it more difficult to stop smoking. Therefore, although some work supports the addition of health education and counselling to rehabilitation programmes, at times this may have a cost. Modifying stress Stress management involves teaching individuals about the theories of stress, encouraging them to be aware of the factors that can trigger stress, and teaching them a range of strategies to reduce stress, such as ‘self-talk’, relaxation techniques and general life management approaches, such as time management and problem solving. Stress Page 378 Black blue