セルビア国国としての適切な緩和行動（NAMA）

by user

on 28 марта 2017

Category: Documents

>> Downloads: 56

409

views

Report

Comments

Description

Download セルビア国国としての適切な緩和行動（NAMA）

Transcript

セルビア国国としての適切な緩和行動（NAMA）

セルビア国
エネルギー・開発・環境保護省（MEDEP）
セルビア国
国としての適切な緩和行動（NAMA）
能力開発プロジェクト
プロジェクト業務完了報告書
平成 25 年 2 月
（2013年）
独立行政法人
国際協力機構（JICA）
株式会社オリエンタルコンサルタンツ
環境
JR
13 - 047
セルビア国
エネルギー・開発・環境保護省（MEDEP）
セルビア国
国としての適切な緩和行動（NAMA）
能力開発プロジェクト
プロジェクト業務完了報告書
平成 25 年 2 月
（2013年）
独立行政法人
国際協力機構（JICA）
株式会社オリエンタルコンサルタンツ
セルビア国国としての適切な緩和行動(NAMA)能力開発プロジェクト
目
プロジェクト業務完了報告書
次
第1章
プロジェクトの概要 ······································································· 1-1
1.1
背景 ·················································································································1-1
1.2
目標及び期待される成果 ······················································································1-2
第2章
活動内容 ······················································································ 2-1
2.1
2.1.1
2.1.2
活動 1：NAMA と MRV に関する理解度の向上支援 ···················································2-4
NAMA と MRV に関する国際議論に関する情報収集 ···············································2-4
各国 NAMA 分類マトリックスの作成···································································2-5
2.2
2.2.1
2.2.2
2.2.3
2.2.4
2.2.5
活動 2： MRV 可能な NAMA のショートリスト作成能力の形成支援······························2-7
NAMA 関連情報に関する調査 ············································································2-7
NAMA ロングリストの作成 ············································································· 2-11
NAMA ロングリストの評価 ············································································· 2-12
NAMA ショートリストの作成 ·········································································· 2-15
MRV 実施に関する能力開発ニーズの特定 ··························································· 2-24
2.3
2.3.1
2.3.2
2.3.3
成果 3：NAMA の実施促進文書作成能力の形成支援 ················································ 2-25
NAMA ショートディスクリプションの作成 ························································ 2-25
NAMA ガイドラインの作成 ············································································· 2-36
財務分析ワークショップの実施 ········································································ 2-37
2.4
2.4.1
2.4.2
2.4.3
2.4.4
成果 4：NAMA の認知度向上能力の強化支援 ························································· 2-40
ウェブサイトの整備 ······················································································· 2-40
COP サイドイベントの実施 ············································································· 2-41
NAMA セミナーの計画と実施 ·········································································· 2-43
プロモーション文書の作成 ·············································································· 2-52
2.5
2.5.1
2.5.2
2.5.3
2.5.4
本邦研修の実施 ································································································ 2-52
研修参加者··································································································· 2-53
研修日程······································································································ 2-53
研修内容（講義・討論・見学） ········································································ 2-54
成果の活用方法について ················································································· 2-58
第3章
プロジェクト実施運営上の課題・工夫・教訓 ······································ 3-1
第4章
プロジェクト目標の達成度（終了時評価結果の概要） ·························· 4-1
4.1
プロジェクト目標 ·······························································································4-1
4.2
上位目標達成への道筋 ·························································································4-4
4.3
4.3.1
4.3.2
4.3.3
4.3.4
各成果の達成状況 ·······························································································4-5
成果 1 ···········································································································4-5
成果 2 ···········································································································4-5
成果 3 ···········································································································4-6
成果 4 ···········································································································4-7
第5章
総括及び提言 ················································································ 5-1
i
セルビア国国としての適切な緩和行動(NAMA)能力開発プロジェクト
プロジェクト業務完了報告書
添付資料
1.
PDM および PO
2.
業務フローチャート
3.
専門家活動実績
4.
合同調整委員会議事録
5.
各国 NAMA 分類マトリックス
6.
NAMA ロングリストと分析結果
7.
NAMA ポートフォリオ
8.
NAMA ショートディスクリプション
9.
NAMA ガイドライン（英語）
10.
NAMA ガイドライン（セルビア語）
11.
バルカン地域 NAMA セミナー参加者リストおよびセミナー資料
12.
本邦研修資料
ii
セルビア国国としての適切な緩和行動(NAMA)能力開発プロジェクト
第1章
1.1
プロジェクト業務完了報告書
プロジェクトの概要
背景
ユーゴスラビア連邦共和国の後継として国連気候変動枠組み条約（UNFCCC）を批准してい
るセルビア共和国（以下、「セ」国）は、地球温暖化に対処すべく 2007 年 10 月に京都議定
書を批准（非付属書Ⅰ締約国）し、2009 年 9 月にはクールアース･パートナー国となってい
るものの、温室効果ガス削減等に十分に対処できておらず、多くの課題を抱えていた。
全世界の温室効果ガス（GHG）排出量のうち、開発途上国から排出される割合は約半分を占
めており、先進国で大幅な削減が実施されたとしても開発途上国における緩和が伴わない限
り、状況の変化は望めない。そのため、UNFCCC では気候変動がもたらす悪影響を最小限に
留めるための方策を開発途上国においても検討することが規定されており、「セ」国でも最
も優先的な課題として「国としての適切な緩和行動」（NAMA: Nationally Appropriate
Mitigation Action）の策定が求められた。しかしながら、「セ」国では中央官庁においても
NAMA を詳細に検討して策定できる十分な能力・経験を持った人材が少ない。そこで、「セ」
国政府は 2009 年 8 月に、2020 年までに国家レベルで GHG を削減するという目標を達成する
ための気候変動緩和策の策定支援を主な内容とする協力要請書を我が国に提出した。
この要請を受けて JICA は、2010 年 6 月～7 月に詳細計画策定調査を実施し、協力要請の背
景、内容を確認するとともに、協力計画を策定・合意した。その後、2010 年 8 月 20 日に R/D
が署名され、エネルギー・開発・環境保護省（MEDEP）（R/D 署名時は環境国土計画省
（MESP））をカウンターパート（C/P）機関として本プロジェクトを実施することとなった。
なお、2011 年３月に行われたセルビア国の省庁再編及び 2012 年 6 月の大統領選挙及び政権
交代に伴って、C/P である気候変動課（Climate Change Division）が所属する省庁が、「環境
国土計画省（Ministry of Environment and Spatial Planning: MESP）」から「環境鉱業国土計画
省（Ministry of Environment, Mining and Spatial Planning: MEMSP）」を経て「エネルギー・開
発・環境保護省（Ministry of Energy, Development, and Environmental Protection: MEDEP）」へ
と変更になった。
1-1
セルビア国国としての適切な緩和行動(NAMA)能力開発プロジェクト
1.2
プロジェクト業務完了報告書
目標及び期待される成果
プロジェクトの目標及び期待される成果は、以下のとおりである。
本業務の目標
「セ」国政府における NAMA を計画して実施を促進する能力が開発される
達成指標
a)
エネルギー・開発・環境保護省の気候変動課職員 3 人以上が、NAMA の計画プロセ
スを十分理解する
b)
ワーキンググループに参加するすべての機関について、１人以上が NAMA の計画プ
ロセスを十分理解する
c)
NAMA とその実施に必要な情報を含む文書が作成される
本業務の基本的実施方針
「セ」国政府が、主体的に NAMA を推進していくために必要な職員と組織の能力の強化
を、側面から技術支援する。
本業務に期待される成果
成果１： NAMA と MRV（測定・報告・検証）に関する理解が深まる
成果２：MRV 可能な NAMA のショートリスト作成能力が開発される
成果３：NAMA の実施を促進するための文書を作成する能力が開発される
成果４：NAMA の認知度を向上する能力が強化される
なお、プロジェクト実施期間中に、C/P、JICA、JCC 参加機関と協議をし、本プロジェクト
のプロジェクトデザインマトリックス（PDM）
および Plan of Operation (PO)に修正を加えた。
最新の PDM および PO は添付資料 1 に示す。主な変更点は以下のとおりである。
-
C/P の名称変更に伴う修正
評価指標（Objectively Verifiable Indicators）を修正
NAMA ショートディスクリプション作成ガイドラインの開発に関わる活動を追記
これらの修正は、2012 年 3 月に開催した合同調整委員会（JCC）で承認された（合同調整委
員会の議事録は添付資料 4 を参照）。
1-2
セルビア国国としての適切な緩和行動(NAMA)能力開発プロジェクト
第2章
プロジェクト業務完了報告書
活動内容
3 年に渡って行った活動のうち、第一年次と第二年次の活動は 2010 年 1 月に C/P と合意、合
同調整委員会（JCC）で承認された「ワークプラン（第一年次および第二年次）」に基づい
て実施し、第三年次の活動は 2012 年 5 月に C/P と合意、JCC で承認された「ワークプラン
（第三年次）」に基づいて実施した。
本プロジェクトにおける、情報収集、NAMA ロングリストの作成と評価、NAMA ショート
リストの作成及び NAMA ショートディスクリプションの作成に至る活動の手順を以下のフ
ローチャートに示す。各ステップで行った技術移転の内容および分析の結果は次項以降に示
す。
第 1 年次
第 2 年次
対象セクターに
おける気候変
動緩和関連の
情報収集およ
び分析
NAMA
ロングリス
トの作成
NAMA
ロングリス
トの評価
NAMA
ショートリ
ストの作成
COPサイド
イベント
および
NAMA
セミナー発表
第 3 年次
評価基準の
設定
図１
モデル
NAMAの
選定
NAMA
ショート
ディスクリ
プション
の作成
バルカン地域
NAMA
セミナー
における成果
の発表・共有
本プロジェクトの活動の手順
本活動はエネルギー・開発・環境保護省（以下「MEDEP」）の気候変動課を C/P として実
施した。関係省庁を含む会議としてワーキンググループを立ち上げ、C/P も参加するワーキ
ンググループ（WG）会議等を通じて技術移転を行った。この会議へ参加する他の関連省庁
機関として、MEDEP の再生可能エネルギー担当部局（旧インフラエネルギー省、Ministry of
Infrastructure and Energy：以下「旧 MIE」）と MEDEP の省エネルギー担当部局（旧セルビア
省エネルギー庁、Serbian Energy Efficiency Agency：以下「旧 SEEA」）、さらに建設都市計
画省（Ministry of Construction and Urbanism：以下「MCU」）、交通省（Ministry of Transport：
以下「MOT」）等の関係省庁、セルビア電力公社（Electric Power Industry of Serbia：以下「EPS」）、
セルビア道路公社（Roads of Serbia) 等が参加した。JICA 専門家チームは C/P およびワーキ
ンググループ参加機関へ技術的な支援を行った。
2-1
セルビア国国としての適切な緩和行動(NAMA)能力開発プロジェクト
プロジェクト業務完了報告書
ワーキンググループに参加した省庁・機関及びメンバーのリストを以下に示す。
表１
所属
エネルギー・開
発・環境保護省
（MEDEP）
ワーキンググループ参加者リスト
旧省庁
旧環境鉱業
国土計画省
（MEMSP）
氏名
Danijela Bozanic
Sandra Lazic
Ana Repac
Dragana Radulovic
旧インフラ
エネルギー省
（MIE）
Dragisa Nikolic
Jelena Simovic
Milena Djakonovic
Predrag Milanovic
Aleksandar Puljevic
旧セルビア省
エネルギー庁
（SEEA）
Dimitrije Lilic
Vesna Rodic
Gordana Stojanovic
建設都市計画省
（MCU）
旧環境鉱業
国土計画省
（MEMSP）
Jasminka Pavlovic
Nina Vukosavljevic
交通省（MOT）
セルビア電力公社
（EPS）
セルビア道路公社
(Roads of Serbia)
ベオグラード熱供
給公社(Belgrade
District Heating
Company)
旧インフラ
エネルギー省
（MIE）
‐
‐
‐
Aleksandar Pavlovic
部署・職位
Head of Climate Change
Division
Mid-level Advisor in Climate
Change Division
Junior Advisor in Climate
Change Division
Junior Advisor in Climate
Change Division
Climate Change Division
Advisor in Department for
Sustainable Development
Junior Advisor in Department
for Sustainable Development
Advisor in the Department for
Renewable Energy
Advisor in the Section of
Renewable Energy Sources
Energy Efficiency in Building
Stock Advisor
Energy Efficiency in Industry
Advisor
Monitoring, Communication
and Evaluation Expert
Senior Adviser,
Sector for Construction and
Land, Head of Department for
Energy Efficiency and
Construction Products
Sector for Construction and
Land, Head of Department for
Energy Efficiency and
Construction Products
Advisor in International Public
Transport Department
Dragan Vukotic
Senior Engineer
Velimir Kopanja
Igor Radovic
Peter Vasiljevic
Project Manager
Chief Engineer
Assistant General Manager
上記の NAMA 関係者が参加し行われたワーキンググループ会議の概要を以下に示す。ワー
キンググループ会議は合計８回実施した。
2-2
セルビア国国としての適切な緩和行動(NAMA)能力開発プロジェクト
表２
回
開催日
第１回
2011 年
1 月 31 日
14 名
第２回
2011 年
6 月 10 日
12 名
第３回
2011 年
7月 5日
12 名
第４回
2011 年
8月 2日
13 名
第５回
2011 年
9 月 15 日
12 名
第６回
2012 年
6月 6日
18 名
第７回
第８回
プロジェクト業務完了報告書
ワーキンググループ会議概要
参加者数
主な協議事項
-
ワーキンググループ参加メンバーの紹介
本プロジェクト概要の紹介
COP16 会議での NAMA/MRV に係る最新情報
各国 NAMA マトリックスの概要
セルビア国の NAMA ポテンシャル
NAMA 関連政策やプロジェクト情報の収集方法
-
ロングリストの進捗
NAMA 情報シートを用いた NAMA サンプルの紹介
GHG 排出削減量計算方法事例（発電、省エネルギー）
NAMA ポテンシャル
2012 年
7 月 10 日
15 名
-
2012 年
12 月 10 日
14 名
-
セルビアにとっての NAMA 開発・実施のメリット
NAMA 実施要件
NAMA の開発ステップおよび事例
GHG 排出削減量計算方法
ロングリスト中の NAMA 候補の情報収集担当者の決
定
NAMA 情報シートを用いた NAMA サンプルの紹介
GHG 排出削減量計算方法事例（発電、省エネルギー）
財務・経済分析の手法の紹介と協議
ショートリスト選定基準に関する協議
ロングリストの評価結果
日本の環境省 MRV 調査チームによる発表
第三年次の活動概要
国連 NAMA 登録簿（プロトタイプ）の紹介
NAMA ショートディスクリプションの目的、使用方
法、概要と書き方、事例紹介
モニタリング、MRV の概要
パイロット NAMA の選定と作成アサイン
NAMA 実施機関によるドラフトショートディスクリ
プションの発表
NAMA ショートディスクリプションの作成ポイント
削減量計算方法（方法論）
NAMA ショートディスクリプションについての発
表、説明、協議
本邦研修参加者による成果共有
NAMA ガイドラインの説明
2-3
セルビア国国としての適切な緩和行動(NAMA)能力開発プロジェクト
プロジェクト業務完了報告書
2.1
活動 1：NAMA と MRV に関する理解度の向上支援
2.1.1
NAMA と MRV に関する国際議論に関する情報収集
1)
COP16 会議での NAMA/MRV に関する決定事項の収集、整理
「セ」国関係者の NAMA/MRV に関する知見を深めるため、COP16 会議における議論、決定
事項に関する情報を収集し、ワーキンググループ会議で情報の共有を行った。
NAMA/MRV に関する、以下の主要な決定事項を収集、整理した。
①
先進国の削減目標、削減行動
-
先進国から提出される削減目標に留意
-
先進国に対し目標の水準の引き上げを要請
-
排出削減目標の進捗報告書を 2 年に一度提出すべきことを決定
-
低炭素発展戦略・計画を策定すべきことを決定
-
先進国は途上国の NAMA の策定と実施、報告の促進に支援することを決定
②
-
途上国の削減行動
2020 年の BAU 排出量と比して排出を抑制することを目指して、その国に適切な緩
和行動（NAMA）を取ることを合意
-
途上国から提出される削減行動に留意
-
途上国が支援を求める NAMA を記録し、支援策とのマッチングを促進する登録簿
を設置
-
国別報告書を４年に一度、排出目録の更新を含む 2 年に一度の更新報告書（BUR）
を提出すべきことを決定
③
-
低炭素発展戦略・計画を策定することを奨励
MRV
国際的に支援を受けた NAMA は、国内で MRV され、UNFCCC で策定される指針
に従って国際的 MRV の対象となる
-
国内予算で実施される NAMA は、UNFCCC で策定される指針に従って国内で MRV
される
-
NAMA は、2 年ごとの進捗報告書において国際的な協議及び分析（ICA）を受ける
2-4
セルビア国国としての適切な緩和行動(NAMA)能力開発プロジェクト
2.1.2
1)
プロジェクト業務完了報告書
各国 NAMA 分類マトリックスの作成
NAMA 分類マトリックスの作成
「セ」国関係者の NAMA に関する理解を深めるため、本プロジェクトの対象セクターであ
るエネルギー効率改善に関する、途上国から提出された NAMA を収集し、マトリックスを
作成した。
NAMA マトリックスの作成においては、NAMA ショートリストの分析およびショートディ
スクリプションを作成する際に、C/P および「セ」国の関係者が有効に活用できるよう配慮
した。マトリックス作成の際に留意した事項は、以下のとおりである。
-
NAMA の活動形態（政策／プロジェクト）
-
NAMA の内容
-
セクターとサブセクターの分類
-
バウンダリー（国レベル／地域レベル）
作成したマトリックスの例を、表３に示す。
表３
No.
Sector
各国 NAMA マトリックス（抜粋）
Sub-sector
Party
NAMA
Bio-fuel Development for Road Transport and for
household use: Project to produce 63.36 million L of
ethanol, produce 621.6 million L of biodiesel
Land preparation:incentive use of bio-fuels for
mechanized agriculture
Promotion of renewable energy: use of biofuels
E-1
Energy
E-2
Energy
Biofuel
Ghana
E-3
Energy
Chad
E-112
Energy
E-113
Energy
Biofuel
Renewable /New
energy
Renewable /New
energy
I-4
Industry
Energy efficiency
Ghana
I-5
Industry
Energy efficiency
Tunisia
I-6
Industry
Standard
Macedonia
T-4
T-5
T-6
T-7
Transportation Biofuel
Macedonia
Improve on resource efficiency in industries to promote
sustainable production and consumption
Develop energy efficiency program in industrial sector
Improve standards for building construction and
insulation and quality of materials used
Promote use of biodiesel
Transportation Biofuel
Macedonia
Introduce biofuels
Transportation Biofuel
Togo
Transportation Biofuel
Chad
T-8
Transportation Financial measure
Mongolia
M-4
Misc./crosscutting
Misc./crosscutting
Misc./crosscutting
Republic of
Congo
Republic of
Congo
Republic of
Congo
M-5
M-6
Biofuel
Study
Study
Study
Ethiopia
Category
Measures
Sub-category
Project
Boundary
National
Measures
Program
National
Measures
Program
National
Peru
Increase newable energy up to 33% of total energy
consumption by 2020
Measures
Policy
National
Mongolia
Installation of large scale PV systems in the Gobi region
Measures
Program
National
Measures
Program
National
Measures
National
Measures
Program
Law/
regulation
Program
National
Measures
Program
National
Promote biofuels
Promoting the exploitation and use of biofuels
Measures
Program
National
Measures
National
Introduce vehicle registration tax
Measures
Program
Law/
regulation
Creation of a national observatory on the environment
Measures
Measures
Installation of a control station on atmospheric pollution,
Measures
water and soil quality
Installation of a relay station for the reception of satellite
Measures
imagery
National
National
Project
National
Project
National
Project
National
コペンハーゲンアコードに賛意を示した非付属書 I 国 101 か国のうち、43 か国が NAMA を
提出している。残る 58 か国は、Communication の提出にとどまっている（2011 年 1 月 6 日
現在）。
各国 NAMA は、4 つのカテゴリーに分類される。それぞれのカテゴリーの内容および提出国
数を、表４に記した。
2-5
セルビア国国としての適切な緩和行動(NAMA)能力開発プロジェクト
表４
カテゴリー
カテゴリー1
(Measures)
カテゴリー2
(Conditions)
カテゴリー3
(Carbon neutral)
カテゴリー4
(Target)
プロジェクト業務完了報告書
カテゴリーの種類と内容および提出国数
カテゴリーの内容
NAMA 提出国数
さまざまな緩和策（政策、立法、計画、事業）
の策定と実施
緩和対策を実施するうえで、基礎となる事柄
（National communication 作成、GHG インベント
リー作成、ベースライン排出の同定等）を実施
カーボンニュートラルを実施することに言及
GHG 排出削減量を策定（GDP 比あるいは目標年
を設定）
23
3
3
14*
*パプアニューギニアは 2030 年までの Target を定めていると同時に、2050 年には Carbon Neutral を定め
ている。しかし、他の多くの国は 2020 年-2030 年を目標年度としているため、Papua New Guinea につい
ては 2030 年の Target を優先させた。
分析の結果、以下の知見を得た。
-
“Measures”および”Conditions”に分類される NAMA には、mitigation measure のみが
記載されており、リファレンスシナリオや削減目標値等の具体的な情報は記載さ
れていない。
-
“Carbon neutral”の NAMA では、具体的な mitigation measure は記載されておらず、
温暖化対策に対する、国の基本的な方針を述べたものであると位置づけられる。
-
“Target”として分類される NAMA では、リファレンスシナリオおよび削減目標値
や目標年度といった、より具体的な内容が記載されている。
-
いずれの NAMA においても、具体的な MRV の実施手法、体制、および NAMA 実
施の前提条件については、記述されていない。
2)
NAMA 分類マトリックスの C/P との共有
NAMA 分類マトリックスおよび NAMA の現状に関する説明資料を使用し、ワーキンググル
ープ会議においてセ国側関係者に対して情報共有を行った。その際に活用された資料は、添
付資料５に示す。
2-6
セルビア国国としての適切な緩和行動(NAMA)能力開発プロジェクト
2.2
プロジェクト業務完了報告書
活動 2： MRV 可能な NAMA のショートリスト作成能力の形成支援
2.2.1 NAMA 関連情報に関する調査
NAMA ショートリストを作成する最初のステップとして、NAMA 候補となるセ国の気候変
動緩和策に関する情報の収集を行った。情報の収集は C/P である MEDEP と JICA 専門家チ
ームが中心になって行い、ワーキンググループ参加省庁・機関等から情報提供を受けた。な
お、情報収集ならびに省エネルギーに関する技術的な分析を行うため、本プロジェクトでは
ベオグラード大学・機械工学部の教授をローカルコンサルタントとして雇用した。
収集した情報は、本プロジェクトで対象とする 3 つのサブセクター（エネルギー、交通、建
物分野）それぞれにおいて、NAMA 候補になりうる「セ」国の政策、法規制、アクション
プラン、プログラム、プロジェクト等に関する情報である。
なお、これまで非付属書Ⅰ国が提出した NAMA には、具体的なアクションが含まれていな
い開発計画や政策、戦略なども NAMA として提出されているケースが多々あるものの、本
プロジェクトにおいては、具体的な活動であり、かつ投資を呼び込めるような、プロジェク
トあるいはプログラムのみを NAMA として選定したいという「セ」国側の要望に基づき、
上位目標である開発計画や戦略はロングリストに含めていない。例えば、セルビアの省エネ
ルギー計画（「The First Energy Efficiency Plan of the Republic of Serbia for the Period from 2010 to
2012」）には、エネルギー最終消費量を 2010 年から 2018 年までに 9%削減する、という明
確なターゲットが設けられているものの、このターゲット自体を NAMA として取り扱うの
ではなく、このターゲットを達成するためのアクションプランや具体的なプロジェクトを
NAMA リストに入れることとした。
NAMA 候補を収集するために参照した文献等を下表に示す。
2-7
セルビア国国としての適切な緩和行動(NAMA)能力開発プロジェクト
表５
種別
法律
NAMA 情報ソース一覧（1）
名称
発行元
Ministry of Infrastructure
and Energy
Ministry of Environment,
Mining and Spatial Planning
Ministry of Environment,
Mining and Spatial Planning
Energy Law
Law on Air protection
Law on Planning and Building
construction
政策・戦略
アクショ
ンプラン
規則・条例
プロジェクト業務完了報告書
Initial National Communication of
the Republic of Serbia under the
United Nations Framework
Convention on Climate Change
Energy sector development strategy
of the Republic of Serbia by 2015
Strategy of Railway, Road, Inland
Waterway, Air and Intermodal
Transport Development 2008-2015
Energy Development Strategy for the
City of Belgrade
The national Waste management
strategy for the period 2010-2019
National Strategy for incorporation
of Republic of Serbia into the Clean
Development Mechanism – Waste
management, Agriculture and
Forestry sector
Biomass Action Plan for the Republic
of Serbia 2010-2012
The first Energy efficiency plan of
the Republic of Serbia for the period
from 2010 to 2012
Regulation on establishing the
program for realizing the power
supply development strategy for the
Republic of Serbia up to year 2015
for the period from 2007 to 2012,
Regulation on energy efficiency in
buildings
Regulation on the conditions, content
and manner of issuance of certificates
of energy performance of buildings
2-8
Ministry of Environment,
Mining and Spatial Planning
Ministry of Infrastructure
and Energy
Ministry of Infrastructure
and Energy
City of Belgrade, City
Administration, Secretariat
for Utilities and Housing
Services
Ministry of Environment,
Mining and Spatial Planning
Ministry of Environment,
Mining and Spatial Planning
発行年
Official Gazette No
57/11
Official Gazette No
36/09
Official Gazette No
72/09 and 81/09,
November 2011
November 2010
Official Gazette No
40/05
"Official Gazette
RS", No. 55/05,
71/05
November 2008
2010
2010
Ministry of Infrastructure
and Energy
Ministry of Infrastructure
and Energy
2010
Ministry of Infrastructure
and Energy
Official Gazette No.
11/2007, 11/2007,
99/2009 and 27/2010
Ministry of Environment,
Mining and Spatial Planning
Ministry of Environment,
Mining and Spatial Planning
December 2011
July 2010
December 2011
セルビア国国としての適切な緩和行動(NAMA)能力開発プロジェクト
種別
その他文献
（F/S 等）
名称
The White Book of the Electric
Power Industry of Serbia
Wood energy – definition,
objectives and challenges in
South-East Europe
Various internal documents
Feasibility Study: The possibility
of Solar energy utilization for
domestic hot water production in
Heating plant Cerak
Program Analyses of State Road
Network and Transport
Rehabilitation Project
Performance Indicators
Reducing Transport Greenhouse
Gas Emissions, TrendsData
Greenhouse Gas Reduction
Strategies in Transport Sector
Statistical Yearbook of Serbia
Project of the Energy Efficiency
in Serbia –IDA credit 3870 YF –
Part B: Public Buildings –
Schools and Hospitals – Final
Results of the Project
Feasibility Study and Preliminary
design for revitalization and
modernization of TPP Nikola
Tesla unit B1 (620 MW)
Feasibility Study and Preliminary
design for revitalization and
modernization of TPP Nikola
Tesla unit A3 (305 MW)
Prefeasibility Study and General
design for CHP Novi Sad
Prefeasibility study of building
new block B3 at TPP Kostolac B
プロジェクト業務完了報告書
発行元
PE EPS – available at website:
www.eps.rs
Prof. Branko Glavonjic, Workshop
on Policy options for wood energy,
Dubrovnik
Belgrade district heating company
and Serbian association of district
heating companies
Institute of Nuclear Sciences
“Vinca”, Laboratory for thermal
engineering and energy, Belgrade
発行年
2011
World Bank Project, Contract No.
WBC/ICS-PA/2010-05
2010
International Transport Forum OECD/ITF
International Transport Forum OECD/ITF
Statistical Bureau of Serbia
Mr. Dimitrije Lilic, Serbian Energy
Efficiency Agency
2010
2009
2010, 2011
2008
2008
2010
2011
Public Enterprise Electric Power
Industry of Serbia
2010
Public Enterprise Electric Power
Industry of Serbia
2008
Public Enterprise Electric Power
Industry of Serbia
Public Enterprise Electric Power
Industry of Serbia
2008
2011
上表に示された情報源から、NAMA になりそうな緩和活動を抽出し、それぞれの詳細情報
を発行元および NAMA 実施機関となる可能性のある機関に問い合わせた。
情報を収集する際に、NAMA 情報シートと呼ばれるドキュメント（CDM の Project Idea Note:
PIN のような短い文書）を各機関に送付し、効率的な情報収集に努めるとともに、同文書の
書き方について NAMA 関係機関に指導することで、NAMA 形成に必要な情報やポイント等
を技術移転するように努めた。NAMA 情報シートは以下の情報をカバーしており、NAMA
ショートリスト化の分析だけでなく、プロモーション資料や NAMA ショートディスクリプ
ションを作成する際にベースとなる多くの情報を含めることとした。
2-9
セルビア国国としての適切な緩和行動(NAMA)能力開発プロジェクト
-
プロジェクト業務完了報告書
NAMA のタイトル
関連する政策（目的／ターゲットとその達成状況）
活動の概要
想定される事業実施者
活動実施場所
実施スケジュールと現在の状況
財務情報（資金ソース、コスト、財務分析結果）
緩和活動としてのターゲット
課題と対策
レファレンスシナリオ（BAU シナリオ）
GHG 排出削減量の推計（適用可能な方法論に関する情報も含む）
参考資料
同フォームを使って NAMA 情報を収集するため、C/P と JICA 専門家チームは各機関を訪問
し、フォームの書き方について指導するとともに、GHG 排出削減のコンセプトや削減量の
計算方法、BAU（Business-as-usual）シナリオ設定の重要性、財務分析の一般的な手法等に
ついて技術移転を行った。
多くの機関は気候変動緩和という観点からプロジェクトを計画、実施した経験はなく、
NAMA や CDM に関する基礎知識も有していなかったため、本活動で行った技術移転を通し
て、基礎的な理解を深めることができた。
訪問先機関のリストとそれぞれの NAMA 活動候補の概要を下表に示す。
表６
訪問先・現地調査リスト（機関名は訪問時のもの）
機関名
Belgrade District Heating
Company
場所
Belgrade
Belgrade Land Development
Public Agency
Business Association of
Serbian District Heating
Companies
District Heating Company
Valjevo
Heat plant in Kragujevac
Josanicka Spa, Mataruska Spa
Belgrade
Municipality of Cajetina
Municipal Supprot Program
Project
Ministry of Infrastructure and
Energy
Kokin Brod
NAMA 候補
Heat metering, rehabilitation of
boilers, fuel change in heat
distribution system
Sustainable public urban transport
Belgrade
Heat meters for district heating, fuel
switch to biomass in heat plants,
rehabilitation of district heating
Expansion of district heating network
Kragujevac
Josanicka,
Mataruska
Cajetina
Belgrade
Fuel switch from coal to natural gas
Geothermal for heating public
buildings
Biomass/ geothermal for heating
Energy efficiency for municipality
Belgrade
Energy projects, transport projects
2-10
セルビア国国としての適切な緩和行動(NAMA)能力開発プロジェクト
機関名
Pribojska
-
プロジェクト業務完了報告書
場所
NAMA 候補
Pribojska Spa Geothermal energy for heating
Public Enterprise Electric
Power Industry
Public Enterprise Roads of
Serbia
Secondary Agricultural School
Belgrade
Power generation projects
Belgrade
Serbian Energy Efficiency
Agency
Serbian Wind Energy
Association
Town of Cacak
Vinca Institute of Nuclear
Sciences
Belgrade
Road rehabilitation, bypass road
construction, road material recycling
Energy efficiency for public
buildings
Energy efficiency improvement in
public buildings
Wind power generation and CDM
application
Geothermal, biomass, solar energy
Priority energy infrastructure projects
in Initial National Communication
Vrsac
Belgrade
Cacak
Belgrade
C/P のウェブサイトを通じた公募
既存の文献等に示された NAMA 候補に加えて、現在計画されている新規活動についても
NAMA 候補に含めるため、C/P（掲載当時は MEMSP）のウェブサイトを通じて公募を行い、
省エネルギーに関する活動を計画している地方自治体などに参加の呼びかけを行った。
図２
ウェブを通じた NAMA 候補の公募（英語およびセルビア語）
2.2.2 NAMA ロングリストの作成
NAMA 候補に関する情報収集の結果、69 件の
Building
19%
NAMA 候補活動が特定された。
内訳は、エネルギー分野 38 件、交通分野 18 件、
建物分野 13 件であった。また、8 割がプラント
Transport
26%
Energy
55%
や設備などの建設や設置を伴うハード案件で、
残りの 2 割は補助金やファンドの設置、あるい
図３
2-11
NAMA ロングリスト内訳
セルビア国国としての適切な緩和行動(NAMA)能力開発プロジェクト
プロジェクト業務完了報告書
は啓発活動の実施といったソフト案件であった。
ロングリストに挙げられた NAMA 候補として、以下の特徴が挙げられる。
-
エネルギー分野
火力発電所の新規建設、既存の火力発電所のリハビリ、天然ガスコジェネレーション
プラントのリハビリなど、多くの GHG 排出削減量が見込まれる活動が多々ある。同
時に、水力発電（小規模）や風力発電、太陽光発電・熱利用、地熱エネルギー利用、
廃棄物処分場におけるメタンガス利用など、再生可能エネルギー利用に関わる活動も
見られる。また、国内で発電に次いで大量のエネルギーを使用している暖房用熱生成
や地域暖房に関する活動も計画されている。さらに、工業セクターでは、工場におけ
る燃料転換の他、エネルギー管理士制度や省エネルギーファンドの設置など、ソフト
系の活動が多くある。
-
交通分野
適切に運営維持管理されずに劣化した道路のリハビリ、バイパス道路の建設や、省エ
ネタイプの車両・バスの導入、バイオ燃料の導入に加え、鉄道の整備や水路の整備な
どモーダルシフトに関わる活動も見られる。
-
建物分野
断熱材や省エネルギー効果の高い窓の導入など、住居用建物における省エネルギー対
策の導入や、省エネ型家電・電球への交換、省エネ街灯の整備、さらに学校や病院な
どの公共施設における暖房効率の向上などが含まれる。
2.2.3 NAMA ロングリストの評価
収集した NAMA 候補 69 件について、各々が「セ」国にとって適切な緩和行動であるか否か
の評価を行った。評価は C/P の MEMSP 気候変動課が中心となって行い、JICA 専門家チーム
は技術的な支援を行った。また、ワーキンググループを通じて関係省庁からの意見も聞き、
評価を行った。
-
評価基準の策定
評価を行うに際し、C/P と共同で評価基準を策定し、これらの基準（クライテリア）を満た
した NAMA 候補のみをショートリストに含むこととした。
評価基準は２段階に分けられ、第一基準では候補の緩和活動が基本的な NAMA の要件を満
2-12
セルビア国国としての適切な緩和行動(NAMA)能力開発プロジェクト
プロジェクト業務完了報告書
たしているか否かをチェックし、第二基準では持続可能性と MRV 可能性をチェックするも
のとした。また、第一基準全てを満たした候補のみを、第二基準の評価の対象とした。
なお、UNFCCC は NAMA に関する基準等をまだ設けていないため、本プロジェクトで開発
したこれらのクライテリアはプロジェクト独自で作成した暫定的なものであり、今後
UNFCCC の決定や「セ」国内の NAMA 承認に関する協議や決定を受けて、随時修正、アッ
プデートを行う必要があると考えられる。
NAMA ショートリスト選定基準を下表に示す。
表７
段階
第一基準
カテゴリー
基本要件
NAMA ショートリスト選定基準
クライテリア
説明
独自性
Distinctiveness
情報の整備状況
Information availability
炭素クレジットのダブ
ルカウント
No double-counting
スケジュール
Timeline
事業実施者の意思
Voluntary participation
一般要件
第二基準
持続可能性
MRV
可能性
整合性
Compliance
GHG 排出削減可能性
GHG reduction potential
財務的フィージビリテ
ィー
Financial feasibility
技術的フィージビリテ
ィー
Technical viability
MRV 可能性
MRVability
2-13
緩和活動が明確な活動であり、スコープや
位置などが決定していること
緩和活動が気候変動の緩和に繋がるかどう
かを評価するための情報・データが十分に
あること
緩和活動が CDM 等の炭素市場メカニズム
に登録あるいは登録申請されていないこと
緩和活動がまだ実現・実施されておらず、
かつ 2020 年までに最初の GHG 排出削減が
達成されること
緩和活動の実施者が NAMA スキームの下
で NAMA 実施者としての役割を自発的に
担うこと
緩和活動が国家計画・戦略やセクター別の
計画・戦略と合致していること
緩和活動がセルビア国内の GHG の排出削
減あるいは排出抑制を行うこと
緩和活動の財務・経済分析の結果が事業実
施者にとって適切なレベルにあること
緩和活動が既に実証済みの技術を使用する
こと
緩和活動が NAMA スキームの下で適切に
測定・報告・検証されること
- GHG 排出削減量が CDM や IPCC
ガイドラインなど国際的に承認を
受けた方法論、あるいはそれらの
方法論をベースとしたものを使用
して計算することができること
- NAMA 実施者が方法論に示された
パラメーターを適切にモニタリン
グできること
セルビア国国としての適切な緩和行動(NAMA)能力開発プロジェクト
-
プロジェクト業務完了報告書
ロングリストの評価
策定した評価基準を 69 件の NAMA 候補それぞれに適用し、各候補が NAMA として適切か
どうかの評価を行った。評価は C/P である MEMSP の気候変動課が中心となって行い、JICA
専門家チームは技術的なアドバイスを提供した。
評価の結果、下表に示すとおり、69 件の NAMA 候補のうち、17 件が第一基準を満たし、更
に 17 件のうち 16 件が第二基準を満たしてショートリスト化された（NAMA ロングリストの
分析結果は添付資料６に示す）。
表８
サブセクター
ロングリスト評価結果
NAMA 候補数
第一基準評価
第二基準評価
エネルギー
38
10
10
交通
18
3
2
建物
13
4
4
合計
69
17
16
評価の結果、「セ」国の NAMA 候補の傾向として、以下の特徴があることが分かった。
-
7 割の NAMA 候補が「独自性（Distinctiveness）」の基準を満たすことができておらず、
緩和策がアイディアレベルで留まっており、具体的な活動にまで至っていないことを示
している。
-
同様に 7 割を越す NAMA 候補が「情報の整備状況（Information availability）」の基準を
満たしていない。活動に関する情報が入手できないため、評価自体が行えない案件が多
数あった。
-
ほぼ全ての NAMA 候補が「整合性（Compliance）」の基準を満たすと評価された。国家
戦略やアクションプラン等の上位政策等の文献から NAMA 候補を抽出したため、当然合
致するものであるが、「国として適切」な行動であるか否かについて本クライテリアを
用いて評価することは重要である。
-
「GHG 排出削減可能性（GHG reduction potential）」基準については、詳細な活動内容が
不明である場合でも、活動の概要を見る限り 9 割を越す NAMA 候補が GHG の排出削減
／抑制に貢献すると評価された。ただし、定量的に GHG 排出削減量を全ての候補につ
2-14
セルビア国国としての適切な緩和行動(NAMA)能力開発プロジェクト
プロジェクト業務完了報告書
いて推計してはおらず、より正確に本基準を適用した場合は上述のとおり情報量の不足
から、相当数が基準を満たすことができないと考えられる。
なお、第一基準および第二基準を満たしておらず、ショートリスト化されなかった NAMA
候補については、C/P が精査をし、今後具体的な活動が出てくる可能性のあるものについて
は、引き続きフォローすることとした。一方で、明らかに基準を満たしていない、いくつか
の NAMA 候補、例えば CDM として今後申請する計画のある活動や、GHG 削減量の算定や
MRV が非常に困難な活動、あるいは活動内容が明確でなく、今後フォローすることが困難
な活動などについては、本プロジェクトでのこれ以上の分析は行わないこととした。
2.2.4 NAMA ショートリストの作成
ショートリスト化された 16 件の NAMA は、エ
Building
25%
ネルギー分野が最も多く 10 件、続いて建物セク
ターの 4 件、そして交通セクターの 2 件となっ
Transport
13%
た。
Energy
62%
各ショートリスト NAMA の概要を次ページ以
降の表に示す。
図４
2-15
NAMA ショートリスト内訳
エネル
ギー
3
2
1
セクター番号
本 NAMA では、褐炭火力発電所の改修と
近代化を通じて 47 MW の能力増強を図
る。具体的には蒸気タービン、凝縮装置
と冷却装置、ボイラーと補助装置の改
修・近代化の他、NOx 燃焼を抑える燃焼
装置の導入や燃焼プロセスの効率化を通
じ、温室効果ガスの排出削減を図る。
本 NAMA では、褐炭火力発電所の改修と
近代化を通じて 30MW の能力増強を図
る。具体的には蒸気タービン、凝縮装置
と冷却装置、ボイラーと補助装置の改
修・近代化の他、NOx 燃焼を抑える燃焼
装置の導入や燃焼プロセスの効率化を通
じ、温室効果ガスの排出削減を図る。
TTP Nikola Tesla –
Unit B2 火力発電所効
率改善プロジェクト
I
TTP Nikola Tesla –
Unit A3 火力発電所効
率改善プロジェクト
II
2-16
本 NAMA は、高効率の超々臨界型褐炭火
力発電所 TPP Nikola Tesla の建設を通じて
温室効果ガスの排出量を削減することを
目指す。 Unit B3 と呼ばれる新設備は
790MWe の発電容量と約 43％の正味効率
を実現する（既存施設の発電効率は約
35％）
。
TPP Nikola Tesla -Unit
B3 790MW 超々臨界
型褐炭火力発電所建
設
91,796
355,142
緩和ポテン
シャル
(t-CO2e/年)
1,337,728
セルビア電力
公社（EPS）
セルビア電力
公社（EPS）
セルビア電力
公社（EPS）
プレ F/S を実施
中。
2017 年着工、
2020 年運転開
始予定。
2013 年の運転
開始を予定。
NAMA
実施機関
現在の状況と
今後の予定
支援／国際
NAMA
支援／国際
NAMA
国内／
国際・支援
NAMA
支援／国際
NAMA
プロジェクト業務完了報告書
EUR30.5 百万 2013 年の運転
開始を予定。
（実施機関
（融資もしく
は株式発行）
）
EUR 22.7 百万
（実施機関お
よび金融機
関）
EUR 1,200 百
万
投資額 (EUR)
(資金ソース)
NAMA ショートリスト
概要
表９
NAMA 名称
セルビア国国としての適切な緩和行動(NAMA)能力開発プロジェクト
エネル
ギー
6
5
4
セクター番号
小水力発電所の建設
2-17
本 NAMA は既存の天然ガス炊きのコジェ
ネプラントを、より高効率の天然ガスコ
ジェネプラントに置き換えるもの。生成
される電力 450MWe はセルビア全国の高
圧送電線網を通じて供給され、また発生
する 300MWth の熱はポンプを通じて
Novi Sad 市にある地域暖房プラントに供
給される。本 NAMA は、1) 効率の低いコ
ジェネプラントをより高効率なものに代
替し、天然ガス消費を削減する。2) CO2
排出量の多い化石燃料を使用する系統電
力を一部代替することで、気候変動の緩
和に寄与する。
TPP Kostolac B 発電所における褐炭火力
発電所の新設に係る NAMA で、block B3
と呼ばれる新しい設備は 600MWe の発電
容量を持ち、正味効率はセルビアにおけ
る通常の褐炭火力発電所の 33.5％を大き
く上回る 40.8％となる。プロジェクトに
は超臨界発電技術が導入される予定で、
発電所は従来の老朽化した低効率な発電
所に比べて GHG の排出量が少なく、気候
変動の緩和に資する。
新規小水力発電所（9 施設、総発電容量
30.4MW、発電量 108GWh/年）の建設を行
う。対象となる小水力発電所は温室効果
ガスを排出せず、本 NAMA の実施を通じ
て温室効果ガスを排出する他の発電所の
利用を抑えることができることから、本
NAMA は気候変動の緩和に寄与する。
CHP Novi Sad 天然ガ
ス・コジェネプラン
トの建設
超臨界型褐炭火力発
電所建設 TTP
Kostolac B
概要
NAMA 名称
セルビア国国としての適切な緩和行動(NAMA)能力開発プロジェクト
102,343
1,390,533
緩和ポテン
シャル
(t-CO2e/年)
1,019,380
EUR 54.6 百万
EUR 954 百万
EUR 250 百万
（戦略的パー
トナーより
51％出資、セ
ルビア国実施
機関より
49%）
投資額 (EUR)
(資金ソース)
建設は 2013
年、運転開始は
2014-2016 年を
予定。
セルビア電力
公社（EPS）
セルビア電力
公社（EPS）
セルビア電力
公社（EPS）
2015 年の操業
を予定。
プレ F/S と全体
的な概略設計
は終了。建設開
始は 2015 年。
2020 年の操業
を予定。
NAMA
実施機関
現在の状況と
今後の予定
支援／国際
NAMA
支援／国際
NAMA
国内／
国際・支援
NAMA
支援／国際
NAMA
プロジェクト業務完了報告書
エネル
ギー
8
7
セクター番号
セルビアは全国各地に豊富なバイオマス 414,501
資源を有し、その量は 100,000 TJ/年と推
定されているが、このうち有効に活用さ
れているものは 10 ％に過ぎない。本
NAMA では全国各地の全ての家庭、商業、
産業セクターに、木材資源（ペレット、
木質チップ）もしくは農業廃棄物を燃料
とする合計で 1000 MW 規模の小型バイオ
マスボイラーを多数導入することを目指
す。
主に化石燃料に依存する小規模で効率の
悪い発電所を代替することを通じて本
NAMA は気候変動の緩和に寄与する。
小規模バイオマスボ
イラーの導入プログ
ラム
2-18
セルビアでは、地域暖房の利用者は暖房
の消費量ベースでではなく、延床面積に
基づいて使用料を支払っているため、省
エネに対するインセンティブが働かな
い。本 NAMA は、暖房消費量の測定機器
を設置することで、消費者毎の消費量の
把握を行い、もって消費量に基づく課金
体系の構築に繋げることを目指す。化石
燃料への依存度が高い住宅セクターにお
いて省エネを促進することで、本 NAMA
は気候変動の軽減に資する。
概要
緩和ポテン
シャル
(t-CO2e/年)
329,117
地域暖房－従量制課
金システムの導入と
計測器等の設置
NAMA 名称
セルビア国国としての適切な緩和行動(NAMA)能力開発プロジェクト
EUR 250 百万
資金ソース：
N/A
EUR 212 百万
資金ソース：
N/A
投資額 (EUR)
(資金ソース)
エネルギー・
開発・環境保
護
省
（MEDEP）
ベオグラード
地域暖房公
社、セルビア
地域暖房協会
複数のパイロ
ットプロジェ
クトを実施中。
機器の導入は
2016 年までに
完了予定。
代替対象発電
所の抽出を今
後行う。2015
年の設置開始
に続き、操業を
開始予定。2019
年までの設置
完了を目指す。
NAMA
実施機関
現在の状況と
今後の予定
支援／国際
NAMA
国内／
国際・支援
NAMA
支援／国際
NAMA
プロジェクト業務完了報告書
交通
エネル
ギー
11
10
9
セクター番号
幹線道路の改修
2-19
セルビアでは過去 10年の間に 3,500 km の
道路が補修されてきたが、財源が乏しい
ことから幹線道路の維持が十分に行われ
ず、悪路は交通渋滞と交通事故を招いて
いる。本 NAMA は総延長 297.5km、19 区
間の幹線道路の改修を行う。
道路の整備により車速が向上し、燃費と
ガソリン、ディーゼルの消費量が抑制す
ることで、GHG の排出を抑える。
ベオグラード市内の 2 地区（Cukarica およ
び Rakovica）の顧客向けの暖房と給湯に
は、現在天然ガスを利用しているが、本
NAMA において、既存の給湯施設の一部
（2700 MWh 相当、7000 世帯分）をソー
ラーコレクターで代替する。活動内容は
5,000 m2 のソーラーコレクター、温水貯蔵
施設、熱交換器等を導入し、これを既存
の熱プラントと接続することで、天然ガ
ス消費を削減する。
本 NAMA では、Nikola Tesla A 火力発電所
（TENT A）で発生する廃熱を、ベオグラ
ード新市街地にある熱プラントへパイプ
ラインを通じて供給する。パイプライン
は年間 3500 時間の運転で約 2,000 GWh の
熱をベオグラード市の地域暖房システム
に供給する。これにより、約 1.9 億 m3 の
天然ガスと 34,000 トンの重油の消費を抑
えることができる。
ベオグラード市
Cerak 熱供給プラン
トにおける太陽熱の
利用と家庭用温水供
給
火力発電所の廃熱を
利用した地域暖房プ
ロジェクト
概要
NAMA 名称
セルビア国国としての適切な緩和行動(NAMA)能力開発プロジェクト
2,138
161,875
緩和ポテン
シャル
(t-CO2e/年)
611
EUR 139 百万
資金ソース：
N/A
EUR 200 百万
資金ソース：
N/A
EUR 1.05 百万
資金ソース：
N/A
投資額 (EUR)
(資金ソース)
ベオグラード
地域暖房公社
F/S は 2008 年
に終了。施設の
導入は 2013 年
に開始し、2015
年の運転開始
を予定。
エネルギー・
開発・環境保
護省
（MEDEP）、
セルビア電力
公社（EPS）、
ベオグラード
地域暖房公
社、ベオグラ
ード市
設計を完了後、交通省、セル
2016 年から
ビア道路公社
2020 年までに
改修の予定。
事業参加者間
の折り合いが
つかず、中断中
（2013 年 2 月
現在）
。
2013 年に建設、
2016 年の施設
の操業を予定。
NAMA
実施機関
現在の状況と
今後の予定
支援／国際
NAMA
支援／国際
NAMA
国内／
国際・支援
NAMA
支援／国際
NAMA
プロジェクト業務完了報告書
建物
交通
14
13
12
セクター番号
概要
緩和ポテン
シャル
(t-CO2e/年)
6,476
地方道路の改修
2-20
地方の一般道路は運営維持管理が適切に
行われておらず、悪路で交通渋滞と交通
事故の問題が顕在化している。本 NAMA
は総延長 2,768 km、129 区間の地方道路の
改修を行う。道路の整備により車速が向
上し、燃費とガソリン、ディーゼルの消
費量が抑制することで、GHG の排出を抑
える。
Valjevo における既存本 NAMA は、既存の地域暖房ネットワー 12,141
の地域暖房ネットワクを Valjevo の都市部にまで広げることで
エネルギー効率の向上と大気汚染の軽減
ークの拡張
を図るものである。これにより、当該地
域に繋がる暖房熱の総容量は 47.6 MW と
なる。具体的には、17.7km（φ125 mm）
の給湯ネットワークの設置と熱効率の悪
い既存の 49 の熱プラントやボイラーの閉
鎖、及び 147 の熱交換機等の設置を行う。
既存住宅の改善、改 1950 年代から 1980 年ごろまでに建設さ 503,929
修（ドア、窓、断熱）れた住宅は断熱性に乏しく、室内の暖房
を通じた暖房効率向には多くのエネルギーが消費されてい
る。本 NAMA の目的は、上記の期間に建
上
設された既存住宅の 10％を省エネするこ
とである。具体的には、断熱のための外
壁や屋根の改修、仕切りの設置による無
駄な暖房の排除、断熱性の高い窓（二重
窓、放射率の低い窓、アルゴンガスを含
む窓）の導入が含まれる。こうした対策
を実施することで暖房に要するエネルギ
ー消費量を 160 kWh/m2y から約 70
kWh/m2y に削減し GHG 排出削減を行う。
NAMA 名称
セルビア国国としての適切な緩和行動(NAMA)能力開発プロジェクト
建設都市計画
省
パイロットプ
ロジェクトを
実施中。住宅の
改修は 2013 年
から開始し、
2020 年に終了
予定。
EUR 723.5 百
万
資金ソース：
N/A （住宅所
有者が費用の
一部を負担）
交通省、セル
場道路公社
2013 年から
2017 年までに
改修工事を行
う予定。
新規火力変電
Valjevo 市、
所と給湯ネッ
Valjevo 地域
トワークに係
暖房公社
る技術文書は
作成済。
設計、施工は
2012 年に開始、
2016 年までに
完了予定。
NAMA
実施機関
現在の状況と
今後の予定
総投資額：
EUR 9.1 百万
（給湯ネット
ワーク：EUR
6.4 百万、熱交
換器等：EUR
2.7 百万）資金
ソース：N/A
EUR 500 百万
資金ソース：
N/A
投資額 (EUR)
(資金ソース)
支援／国際
NAMA
支援／国際
NAMA
国内／
国際・支援
NAMA
支援／国際
NAMA
プロジェクト業務完了報告書
建物
16
15
セクター番号
セルビア国における大多数の古い建物に 8,326
は省エネ対策が施されていないため、エ
ネルギー消費量は甚大で温室効果ガスの
排出量の増加に寄与している。
本 NAMA は学校や病院等といった公共施
設に対する省エネ対策の実施をその内容
とする。具体的な建物の選定等は当該施
設を所管する省庁により選定される。現
時点では 49 の公共建物（23 の学校、26
の病院）を想定しており、省エネ対策案
として屋根、天井、壁の断熱や窓の交換、
照明の設置等が検討されている。
公共施設におけるエ
ネルギー効率向上プ
ロジェクト（SEEP）
2-21
セルビアでは 1970 年代より居住・非居住
者向け建物のエネルギー効率の下限が設
けられている。この基準を更に引き上げ
た法律が 2011 年に可決され、これに基づ
いて新設される全ての建物が外壁、仕切
り、屋根、天井、窓等を断熱性の高いも
のとする。これにより、新設される住居
での熱エネルギー消費量は 100 kWh/m2y
から 60 kWh/m2y へ、非居住用建物では
110 kWh/m2y から 70kWh/m2y へと減り、
これに伴い温室効果ガスも削減される。
概要
緩和ポテン
シャル
(t-CO2e/年)
275,282
新省エネ基準に基づ
く省エネルギー建物
の新設
NAMA 名称
セルビア国国としての適切な緩和行動(NAMA)能力開発プロジェクト
EUR 10.9 百万
EUR 285.5 百
万
資金ソース：
N/A
投資額 (EUR)
(資金ソース)
NAMA
実施機関
対象建物は選
定済。施工開始
は 2013 年。
エネルギー・
開発・環境保
護省
（MEDEP）
建物省エネ基
建設都市計画
準は 2011 年 8
省
月に可決。2012
年 9 月に発効。
2013 年の着工
で 2020 年まで
に順次完成予
定。
現在の状況と
今後の予定
支援／国際
NAMA
国内／
国際・支援
NAMA
国内
NAMA
（一部支援
NAMA も
検討）
プロジェクト業務完了報告書
セルビア国国としての適切な緩和行動(NAMA)能力開発プロジェクト
プロジェクト業務完了報告書
ショートリスト化された「セ」国の NAMA 16 件の特徴を以下に述べる。
-
ショートリスト化された NAMA の 6 割以上がエネルギー（発電および熱生成）に関
する NAMA であった。「セ」国の GHG インベントリ（1998 年データ）によると、
同国の GHG 排出量の半分以上はエネルギー生成によるものであり、この分野の排出
削減ポテンシャルは非常に大きいと考えられる。「セ」国の発電源は、6 割以上が石
炭を中心とした火力発電所によるものであり、それらの多くは老朽化が進んでおり、
発電効率が非常に低い。ま系統電力の CO2 排出係数も 0.945 t-CO2e/ MWh と非常に高
い*。これらの発電所の効率改善を行う NAMA、あるいは新たに高効率の石炭火力発
電所を建設する NAMA が 16 件中 4 件を占めた。
-
再生可能エネルギーに関する NAMA も３件と多く、小水力（新設とリハビリプロジ
ェクト）、バイオマス（プログラム型）、そして太陽熱利用が含まれる。発電規模
と GHG 排出削減量ともに、単体で見ると小さいものの、プログラムとして一つの
NAMA として提案しているため、中規模の NAMA になる。「セ」国は再生可能エネ
ルギーを利用した発電に対する固定価格買取り制度を設けており、小水力 NAMA
（新
規案件のみ）には適用される。
-
冬季が日本よりも長く厳しい「セ」国では、火力発電所からの排出に次いで、住宅・
ビルの暖房に使用される燃料の消費に伴う GHG 排出が非常に大きい。発電所では燃
料あたりの CO2 排出係数が非常に高い石炭が主に使用されているのに対し、暖房用
燃料は係数が石炭より小さい天然ガス、そして重油が利用されてはいるものの、冬
季の間は継続して大量の燃料が消費されるため、GHG 排出量も大きいものになる。
地域暖房化も全国で進んでおり、各家庭で電気を使用して暖を取るよりも、GHG 排
出量は小さくなると考えられるが、地域暖房の大きな問題として現行の課金制度が
ある。「セ」国の各都市では、使用量に応じた従量制課金制度ではなく、床面積に
応じた定額制となっており、利用者はどれだけ暖房を利用しても毎月の支払額は一
定となっている。このため、省エネルギーに関する意識が非常に低いことも今後克
服していかなければならない点として挙げられる。NAMA では、ベオグラード市で
従量制を導入するとともに、エネルギー利用量を測定する装置や温度制御装置の設
置などを計画している。
*
C/P（当時は MEMSP）がイタリア政府との協力で、「セ」国のグリッド排出係数を計算している。以前
は MEMSP の DNA ウェブサイトで計算過程と結果が参照できたが、C/P 気候変動課の所属省庁の変更に伴
い、現在は閲覧できない。
2-22
セルビア国国としての適切な緩和行動(NAMA)能力開発プロジェクト
-
交通セクターからは既存の幹線道路および一般道の補修に関する NAMA２件がショ
ートリスト化された。1998 年の GHG インベントリによると、同分野からの排出量
は全体の排出量の約５％を占める。郊外の道路は運営維持管理が行われておらず、
老朽化が進んでいる、あるいは戦争時に破壊されたままになった状態の道路が多く
存在し、車両が速度を極端に落とさないと通行できない状態となっている。NAMA
ではこれらの道路の補修を行い、車両の速度を維持・向上し、GHG 排出量を減らす
ものである。対象となる道路は郊外に位置し、交通量も都市部と比べて少ないため、
投資規模に比べて GHG 削減量は非常に小さいものの、悪路による交通事故の多発、
経済活動への悪影響等が改善されるなど、「セ」国の持続可能な開発への貢献度は
高く、NAMA の意義も高いと考えられる。鉄道の整備など、道路交通以外の分野で
は、国の政策にはあるものの具体的な案件がなく、ショートリストには残らなかっ
た。
-
住宅・ビルの省エネに関する NAMA が３件ショートリスト化された。①1980 年頃ま
でに立てられた家屋・アパートは、規制はあったもののエネルギー効率が非常に悪
く、NAMA では全国にあるこれらの古い建物に、新たに効率の良い窓やドア、断熱
材を設置する。②今後新たに建設される家屋に対しては、2011 年から適用されてい
る省エネ基準に従って、海外からの支援は受けずに「セ」国独自で実施する計画で
あり、国内（domestic）NAMA としてショートリスト化した。また、基準よりも更
に高効率の省エネ家屋を建設した場合は、国際（international/ supported）NAMA とし
て、支援の対象、あるいはクレジットの取得を検討する。③学校や病院など、全国
にある 49 の公共施設で、窓の交換や断熱材の利用などを行うもので、フェーズ１は
2005 年に実施、フェーズ２は 2008 年から実施中であり、ともに世銀からのローンで
実施された。
-
ショートリスト化された NAMA の事業実施者は、セルビア電力公社、セルビア道路
公社、ベオグラード地域暖房公社など、多くが公社であり、人材と資金も豊富にあ
り、F/S を実施（外注）するキャパシティがあると考えられる。一方で、セルビアの
省庁自身が NAMA 実施者となっている NAMA もあり、省庁自身が緩和活動に関す
る詳細な F/S を今後実施する余裕はないと考えられるため、実施に繋げる為には支
援を受ける必要があると考えられる。
2-23
セルビア国国としての適切な緩和行動(NAMA)能力開発プロジェクト
プロジェクト業務完了報告書
2.2.5 MRV 実施に関する能力開発ニーズの特定
本プロジェクトは、NAMA の開発、推進に関わる「セ」国側のキャパシティディベロップ
メントを行うものである。しかし、NAMA は適切な MRV が行われて初めて国際的に NAMA
として認められるものであるという、MRV の重要性を考え、本プロジェクトでは主に「セ」
国の NAMA 関係者に対して、MRV のうち M（計測）および R（報告）に関するキャパシテ
ィディベロップメントを実施した。本プロジェクトで行った技術移転を通じて考察した、
「セ」国の MRV の現状と、MRV に関する能力開発ニーズに関する考察結果を以下に示す。
-
現在の「セ」国における NAMA の MRV 実施能力に関する考察
NAMA の MRV については、国際的な議論が現在まで行われている最中であり、国際的な
MRV に関するルールは殆ど決まっていないため、他の途上国同様に、「セ」国としても
NAMA の MRV 体制の整備は UNFCCC の決定を待ってから正式に検討、決定されるともの
と考えられる。
一方で、EU の正式な加盟候補国である「セ」国は、EU の基準に合わせて MRV 体制の整備
に取り組んでおり、特に EU-ETS の対象となる産業セクターについては、国内でも MRV 体
制の整備が他のセクターに先駆けて進むと思われる。そして、EU 基準に合わせて整備され
る「セ」国の MRV 体制が、NAMA スキームにも一部適用されることが予想される。
しかし、本プロジェクトで対象としたのは、エネルギー（電力および熱生成）、交通、建物
の省エネルギー分野のみであり、廃棄物、産業、農業、森林等その他のセクターにおいては、
NAMA 開発と同時に MRV の能力開発が望まれる。
-
M（計測）および R（報告）
NAMA の MRV において、計測に関する活動を行うのは、NAMA を実施する「セ」国の
省庁、機関になると思われる。これらの NAMA 実施機関の計測に関するキャパシティは、
機関によって相当の差があることが判明した。
例えば、本プロジェクトにおいて NAMA 開発に関わった、セルビア電力公社は、人材が
他の NAMA 実施機関と比べても豊富にあり、（自身の発電所における発電量等の）計測・
報告活動を日々の業務の一環として行っていることもあり、計測に関するキャパシティは
非常に高く、能力開発のニーズはやや低いと言える。しかし、このようなキャパシティを
有している機関は一部であり、その他多くの NAMA 実施機関は、気候変動緩和の観点か
ら事業を実施した経験が少なく、計測・報告活動について理解があまりない場合が多く、
このような機関に対しては基礎的なことから能力強化を行う必要があると考えられる。
計測したデータ・情報は、NAMA 実施機関がそれらを取り纏めて、NAMA のフォーカル
2-24
セルビア国国としての適切な緩和行動(NAMA)能力開発プロジェクト
ポイントに報告（提出）することになると想定される。「セ」国の NAMA のフォーカル
ポイントは、まだ正式には決定していないが、本プロジェクトの C/P である MEDEP の気
候変動課であれば、CDM の指定国家機関（DNA）としての経験も豊富にあり、本プロジ
ェクトで国連の NAMA 登録簿に関する調整の経験もあることから、NAMA 報告書のチェ
ック活動は問題なく実施できると考えられる。
また、効率的に報告を受けるためにも、NAMA 実施機関に対して NAMA 報告の意義や報
告書作成のポイント等について能力強化を行う必要がある。
-
V（検証）
NAMA の検証活動についても国際交渉が進行中であるものの、国際的な支援を受ける
NAMA（supported NAMA）は、GHG 削減量計算等について、外国からのチェックを受け
ることになる可能性がある。一方で、全ての NAMA は国内で MRV を実施する（domestically
MRV-ed）という決定もあるため、「セ」国内でも NAMA の検証活動が行われると思われ
る。
「セ」国には、CDM の指定運営組織（DOE）はないものの、NAMA 検証機関の候補とな
りうる機関が、研究機関や大学など複数あり、これらの機関に対して、NAMA の検証活
動に関する能力強化を実施できるものと考えられる。
成果 3：NAMA の実施促進文書作成能力の形成支援
2.3
2.3.1 NAMA ショートディスクリプションの作成
1)
NAMA ショートディスクリプションの雛形の作成
「セ」国側関係者の NAMA 実施プロモーション文書の作成能力を向上することを目的とし
て、NAMA ショートディスクリプションの作成を行った。
本文書の雛形について C/P と協議を行い、文書に含める内容は UNFCCC の NAMA 登録簿（プ
ロトタイプ）や隔年報告書（biennial update report: BUR）に記載する必要がある内容を網羅
することとした。
NAMA ショートディスクリプションは以下の 5 部構成とし、「セ」国の NAMA 実施機関が
作成可能で、かつ今後「セ」国の NAMA に投資を検討するドナー等投資家にとって必要な
情報が網羅されるようにも配慮し、プロモーション文書としても活用できるように図った。
2-25
セルビア国国としての適切な緩和行動(NAMA)能力開発プロジェクト
プロジェクト業務完了報告書
1. NAMA 概要
2. 財務情報
3. 必要な支援に関する情報
4. 削減量計算と MRV
5. その他持続可能な開発への貢献に関する情報
添付：財務分析結果
また、雛形の内容については、ワーキンググループ会議を通じて参加メンバーへ説明・共有
を行い、意見を募った。
C/P 機関は NAMA ショートディスクリプションを作成する機関ではなく、NAMA の実施促
進および調整を担当することとなる点を踏まえ、C/P 自身が、今後変化する UNFCCC での
NAMA/ MRV に関する決定事項や情報を的確に分析し、NAMA 文書の雛形を適宜改定する
ことができるように、また、NAMA 実施機関に対して NAMA 文書の作成に関して的確な指
導が可能となるように、専門家チームは技術移転を行い、C/P を支援した。
2)
NAMA ショートディスクリプション作成対象案件（パイロット NAMA）の選定
ショートリスト化され選定された 16 件の NAMA 案件から、7 件をショートディスクリプシ
ョン作成対象案件として C/P が選定した。JICA 専門家チームは、選定に際し技術的なアド
バイスを提供した。
選定に当たっては、ワーキンググループ参加機関が優先するプロジェクトを選定することに
よって、今後「セ」国で計画、開発されることが見込まれる汎用性の高い緩和行動を中心に
選定されるように配慮した。
NAMA 実施機関からも、ショートディスクリプションを作成する案件の追加希望が C/P に寄
せられ、ショートディスクリプション作成担当者が新たに NAMA ショートディスクリプシ
ョン作成者としてアサインされるなどの積極的な活動があった。このように「セ」国全体と
してワーキンググループ会議を通じ NAMA の認知度が向上され、NAMA 実施機関が主体的
に NAMA 実現に向けて取り組んでいる様子が見受けられた。今後本プロジェクト終了後に
おいても、同種の NAMA が提案された際に、本プロジェクトで作成した成果を参考として
活用し、NAMA 関係機関が独自に NAMA 実施促進文書を作成できることが期待される。
2-26
セルビア国国としての適切な緩和行動(NAMA)能力開発プロジェクト
選定された案件を下表に示す。
表 10
NAMA ショートディスクリプション作成対象案件の概要
番号セクター
3)
ｼｮｰﾄﾃﾞｨｽｸﾘﾌﾟｼｮﾝ
作成主担当
NAMA 名称
1
ｴﾈﾙｷﾞｰ
TPP Nikola Tesla -Unit B3 790MW
超々臨界型褐炭火力発電所建設
EPS
2
ｴﾈﾙｷﾞｰ
小水力発電所の建設
EPS
3
ｴﾈﾙｷﾞｰ
4
ｴﾈﾙｷﾞｰ
5
交通
6
建物
7
建物
小規模バイオマスボイラーの導
入プログラム
火力発電所の廃熱を利用した地
域暖房プロジェクト
MEDEP
MEDEP
Ministry of Transport,
Roads of Serbia
既存住宅の改善、改修（ドア、窓、 Ministry of Construction and
Urbanism (MCU)
断熱）を通じた暖房効率向上
公共施設におけるエネルギー効
MEDEP
率向上プロジェクト（SEEP）
幹線道路の改修プロジェクト
NAMA ショートディスクリプションの作成及び技術移転
選定された NAMA について、ショートディスクリプションを作成し、技術移転を行った。
文書作成及び技術移転に際しては、NAMA 実施機関においては本プロジェクト終了後も独
自に NAMA 開発、文書作成を行えるように、かつ、C/P においては NAMA 実施機関に対し
て適切なアドバイスを提供できるように配慮した。
NAMA ショートディスクリプションの作成は、専門家チームが中心となって行うのではな
く、将来的に自らが NAMA を実施することになる NAMA 実施機関に作成を依頼し、自立発
展性と持続性を確保するように努めた。
ワーキンググループの中の NAMA 実施機関からの参加者を NAMA ショートディスクリプシ
ョン作成担当としてアサインし、これまで実施した活動である、NAMA 情報シートの作成、
NAMA ショートリストの分析で得た経験に基づき、文書のドラフトを作成してもらい、作
成されたドラフトに対し、C/P、JICA 専門家チーム、他のワーキンググループメンバーから
のコメントを受け、協議を重ねて文書を完成させていく手順を採用した。
また、NAMA ごとに異なる GHG 削減量計算方法や MRV、モニタリング計画や財務・経済
分析に関する詳細な議論については、後述のとおり各参加者と個別協議を行い、NAMA 文
書のブラッシュアップを行う中で、C/P と JICA 専門家とが NAMA 実施機関と密に協議でき
るように図った。
2-27
セルビア国国としての適切な緩和行動(NAMA)能力開発プロジェクト
プロジェクト業務完了報告書
上記の手法を採用したことにより、NAMA 実施機関の技術的な理解とキャパシティが更に
向上しただけでなく、C/P においては、今後提案される新規 NAMA 案件についてポイントを
押さえた指導を行う能力を培うことができた。
なお、NAMA 実施機関と C/P から、ショートディスクリプション作成に当たり特に質疑が多
くあった技術的な内容として、GHG 排出削減量計算の手法が挙げられる。GHG 排出削減量
の推計手法（方法論）の選定は、MRV に直接関わる重要な事柄である。様々な方法論が存
在する中で、C/P およびワーキンググループ参加者との協議の結果、NAMA ショートディス
クリプションで採用する GHG 排出削減量計算手法については、承認済み CDM 方法論ある
いはそれをベースにした手法か、IPCC ガイドラインや J-MRV など、国際的に使用されてい
る計算手法を優先オプションとした。これらの手法を採用することにより、NAMA が将来
実施される時点で（国連あるいは当該 NAMA の投資国に）要求されるであろう精度を可能
な限り確保できるように努めた。
作成した NAMA ショートディスクリプションを添付資料 8 に示す。
専門家チームから「セ」国側への技術移転は、全体ワーキンググループ会議を通じて行った
他、対象の NAMA ごとに詳細な議論を行うため、C/P と JICA 専門家チームでワーキンググ
ループ参加機関の事務所を個別に訪問し、詳細な技術移転を行った。各個別協議の概要を以
下に示す。
表 11
気候変動関連省庁・機関に対する技術移転活動（省庁名は打合せ実施時のもの）
第1回
参加者
テーマ
ディスカッション
のポイント
第2回
参加者
テーマ
ディスカッション
のポイント
第3回
参加者
テーマ
2012/06/13
全体：8 名
（MEMSP：2 名、SEEA：1 名、Energoprojekt Entel： 1 名、JICA 専門家チ
ーム：４名）
SEEP プロジェクトの財務分析に係るショートディスクリプションへ記
載する情報の提供について
・ SEEP プロジェクトの財務分析に係るキャッシュフロー、IRR 等の情
報について、 SEEA および SEEA から財務分析を委託された
Energoprojekt Entel と協議。
・固定価格買い取り制度について意見交換。
・ NAMA の対象となっている 23 の学校と 26 の病院について協議。
2012/06/20
全体：10 名
（MIE ：1 名、セルビア道路公社：4 名、JICA 専門家チーム：5 名）
幹線道路の路面改修プロジェクトのショートディスクリプションのドラ
フト作成及び財務情報の提供について
・セルビア道路公社のプロジェクトである、幹線道路の路面改修プロジ
ェクトについて、ショートディスクリプションのドラフトの提出及び
必要な財務情報について協議。
・道路プロジェクトとキャッシュフローの考え方について技術移転。
2012/06/21
全体：8 名
（MIE：1 名、セルビア電力公社 2 名、JICA 専門家チーム：5 名）
ショートディスクリプションのドラフト作成及び財務情報等の提供依頼
2-28
セルビア国国としての適切な緩和行動(NAMA)能力開発プロジェクト
ディスカッション
のポイント
第4回
参加者
テーマ
ディスカッション
のポイント
第5回
参加者
テーマ
ディスカッション
のポイント
第6回
参加者
テーマ
ディスカッション
のポイント
について
・セルビア電力公社のプロジェクトである、高効率の石炭火力発電所の
建設プロジェクトについて、ショートディスクリプションのドラフト
の作成及び必要な財務情報について協議。
・ BOCM と NAMA プロジェクトの関係について意見交換。
・ショートディスクリプションの作成ポイント、FS の結果について協
議。
2012/06/26
全体：6 名
（MIE：2 名、JICA 専門家チーム：4 名）
ショートディスクリプションのドラフト作成及び本プロジェクトについ
ての説明
・ MIE のプロジェクトである小規模バイオマスボイラーの導入プログ
ラムと火力発電所の排熱を利用した地域暖房プロジェクトについて
協議。
・本 NAMA プロジェクト及びショートディスクリプションの作成の意
義について、海外からの投資を呼び込むことにつながる点について情
報共有。
・技術情報について、記載のポイントについて技術移転。特に GHG 削
減計算の方法論について、CDM 方法論や他の手法について協議。
2012/07/02
全体：10 名
（MIE：2 名、MEMSP：1 名、ベオグラード市：1 名、セルビア電力公社：
1 名、ベオグラード地域熱供給公社：2 名、JICA 専門家チーム：3 名）
火力発電所の排熱利用地域熱暖房プロジェクトについての情報入手とシ
ョートディスクリプション作成について
火力発電所の排熱を利用した地域熱暖房プロジェクトについて、各種情
報の入手先や精度、ショートディスクリプション作成のポイント等につ
いて協議を行った。
・ MIE のプロジェクトとしても費用対効果の高いプロジェクトである
と MIE は考えている。
・ベオグラード市としては、輸入に頼る電力の 1/3 をまかなうことがで
き、高価な輸入電力に頼らなくてもよくなるという利点がある。
・セルビア電力公社としても安定したエネルギー供給の観点からも重
要である。
・ベオグラード地域熱供給公社としても天然ガス燃焼を用いる熱供給
は費用対効果が低いため、この排熱を利用できることは利点がある。
・本プロジェクトでは、MIE を中心的な事業実施者とし、セルビア電
力公社、ベオグラード地域熱供給公社がサポートする形でこの排熱利
用プロジェクトを運営することを関係者間で確認した。
・ NAMA ショートディスクリプション作成は MIE が行うことを関係者
間で確認した。
2012/07/17
全体：7 名
（MIE：2 名、MEMSP：1 名、JICA 専門家チーム：4 名）
小規模バイオマスボイラーの導入プログラムに関する具体的なバイオマ
スボイラー交換実施候補に関する情報整理、議論
具体的なバイオマスボイラー交換実施候補箇所に関する情報整理のため
協議を実施し、JICA 専門家から MIE のプロジェクト担当者へ技術移転を
実施した。
・適用されうる類似 CDM 方法論について、障壁となる項目の定義と
NAMA での取り扱い、考え方について技術移転を行った。
・プロジェクト推進に向けて、既にバイオマスボイラーを使用している
ヒートプラントの現況と、既存のバイオマス消費地について意見交
換。
・バイオマスの調達先と輸送費に関する協議。
・セルビア国内でペレットは燃料として高額で、6 社ほどあるが、輸出
しており、本プロジェクトでは加工されたペレット製品ではなく、廃
材を直接燃焼させるボイラーを対象として想定する。
・プロジェクト担当者から、特に経済分析について本プロジェクトで採
2-29
セルビア国国としての適切な緩和行動(NAMA)能力開発プロジェクト
第7回
参加者
テーマ
ディスカッション
のポイント
第8回
参加者
テーマ
ディスカッション
のポイント
第9回
参加者
テーマ
ディスカッション
のポイント
第 10 回
参加者
テーマ
ディスカッション
のポイント
プロジェクト業務完了報告書
算ベースにのせることだけを想定して NAMA ショートディスクリプ
ションを作成することとしていたが、資金援助を受ける形でのプログ
ラム NAMA として考え直す必要があるため、持ち帰り省内で議論し、
再度プロジェクトの性質について検討することとした。なお、省内の
共通理解として MIE のプロジェクトとしても費用対効果の高いプロ
ジェクトであることは確認されている。
2012/07/18
全体：8 名
（MIE：1 名、MEMSP：1 名、セルビア電力公社：3 名、JICA 専門家チー
ム：3 名）
TPP Nikola Tesla Unit B3 超臨界型褐炭火力発電所建設についての情報共
有と適用する方法論等について
超臨界型褐炭火力発電所建設プロジェクトについて、NAMA ショートデ
ィスクリプション作成担当及びセルビア電力公社及びエネルギー省の関
係者と会議を行い、参考となる CDM 方法論についての考え方に関する技
術移転及び METI F/S に関する情報共有を行った。
・関連する CDM 方法論の CDM 理事会（EB）での検討の進捗状況の最
新情報の共有を行った。
・ JICA 専門家から、適用する方法論について技術移転した。具体的に
は、本プロジェクトが大規模であり、投資金額が大きいことかつ GHG
削減量が大きいことから、チェックが厳しいことが想定されることを
説明した。あわせて参照とするべき方法論を推薦した。この方法論は
現在 EB で修正について議論中であり、以後 EB での議論を踏まえ本
NAMA プロジェクトに適用するべきということを説明し納得され
た。
・ METI の超超臨界技術の FS について意見交換した。
・セルビア電力公社 NAMA ショートディスクリプション作成担当者か
ら、EB での議論を待って方法論の適用を検討する。
2012/07/24
全体：6 名
（MEMSP：1 名、SEEA：2 名、JICA 専門家チーム：3 名）
公共施設におけるエネルギー効率向上プロジェクト（SEEP）で参考とし
て適用する CDM 方法論について
標記プロジェクトを実施する SEEA と方法論案について会議を行った。
・ SEEP プロジェクトで GHG 削減量計算に参考とする CDM 方法論につ
いて協議を行った。具体的な計算について JICA 専門家チームから、
サンプルとして SEEP プロジェクトの Energy Audit を元としてひとつ
の建物を対象として GHG 計算を行ったものをわたし、計算手法につ
いて技術移転した。
2012/07/24
全体：10 名
（MEMSP：3 名、JICA 専門家チーム：3 名）
既存住宅の改善、改修（ドア、窓、断熱）を通じた暖房効率向上プロジ
ェクトで参考として適用する CDM 方法論について
既存住宅の改善、改修（ドア、窓、断熱）を通じた暖房効率向上プロジ
ェクトで参考として適用する CDM 方法論について、MEMSP 担当者を訪
問し、技術移転を行った。
・方法論の選定のための CDM方法論ガイドブックについて協議を行っ
た。あわせて、参考とする CDM 方法論の選定について方法論オプシ
ョンを示し、考え方について技術移転を行った。
・ショートディスクリプションの財務情報に関する記載について技術
移転を行った。
2012/09/11
全体：7 名
（MEMSP：1 名、MCU：2 名、JICA 専門家チーム：4 名）
既存住宅の改善、改修（ドア、窓、断熱）を通じた暖房効率向上プロジ
ェクトでの UNFCCC の Seeking Support のドキュメントの作成について
UNFCCC の NAMA 登録簿 Seeking Support のドキュメントの作成について
協議を行った。
・ UNFCCC の議論の進捗に伴い、NAMA 登録簿の Seeking Support のド
2-30
セルビア国国としての適切な緩和行動(NAMA)能力開発プロジェクト
第 11 回
参加者
テーマ
ディスカッション
のポイント
第 12 回
参加者
テーマ
ディスカッション
のポイント
第 13 回
参加者
テーマ
ディスカッション
のポイント
キュメントの作成が必要である。同ドキュメントには、Preparation と
Implementation の 2 種類がある。
・およそ 10,000 戸の対象建物について、省エネ効果と改修費用算出の
ための F/S 調査を実施することが提案された。
・ NAMA 登録簿の Seeking Support の Preparation と Implementation の 2
種類両方及び NAMA ショートディスクリプションについて、MCU
の担当者が作成し提出する旨の申し出があった。
2012/09/14
全体：8 名
（MEDEP：4 名、JICA 専門家チーム：4 名）
火力発電所の排熱利用地域熱暖房プロジェクト及び小規模バイオマスボ
イラーの導入プログラムの UNFCCC の Seeking Support のドキュメントの
作成及び NAMA ショートディスクリプションの作成について
UNFCCC の Seeking Support のドキュメントの作成及び NAMA ショートデ
ィスクリプションの作成について協議を行った。
・ UNFCCC の議論の進捗に伴い、NAMA 登録簿の Seeking Support のド
キュメントの作成が必要である。同ドキュメントには、Preparation と
Implementation の 2 種類がある。
・火力発電所の排熱利用地域熱暖房プロジェクトでは EPS 及びベオグ
ラード市は F/S のための資金を出す旨の発言をしていたことから、
Preparation については作成しない可能性もあるものの、両者からのメ
ール返答がなく、不透明なため両方のドキュメントを準備する。
・小規模バイオマスボイラーの導入プログラムについては、F/S が実施
されていないことから、Preparation と Implementation の 2 種類を作成
するのが良いと考えられる。
・ NAMA ショートディスクリプションの各記載項目について、技術移
転した。具体的には、海外投資家を対象としわかりやすく説明する詳
細な情報（地図、パイプラインのための既存の橋梁、実施者、F/S の
調査のための資金の必要性の有無等）を追加するよう指導した。
・バイオマスの市場の形成とバイオマスボイラーの導入について意見
交換を行った。
2012/09/14
全体：6 名
（MEMSP：1 名、SEEA：1 名、JICA 専門家チーム：4 名）
NAMA ショートディスクリプションと UNFCCC Seeking Support form for
implementation について
NAMA ショートディスクリプションと UNFCCC Seeking Support form for
implementation について担当者と会議を実施した。
・ SEEP2 及び SEEP3 の枠組みと進捗について情報交換した。
・ UNFCCC の議論の進捗に伴い、NAMA 登録簿の Seeking Support のド
キュメントの作成が必要である。同ドキュメントには、Preparation と
Implementation の 2 種類がある旨の説明を MEDEP 側から行った。
・ SEEP プロジェクトで GHG 削減量計算に参考とする CDM 方法論につ
いて協議を行った。
・具体的な GHG 削減の計算について協議を行った。
2012/09/20
全体：7 名
（MEDEP：1 名、セルビア道路公社：2 名、JICA 専門家チーム：4 名）
幹線道路の路面改修プロジェクトのショートディスクリプションのドラ
フトの提出及び必要な財務情報等について
幹線道路の路面改修プロジェクトのショートディスクリプションのドラ
フトの提出及び必要な財務情報について、MEMSP 担当者を訪問し、会議
を行った。
・ NAMA 登録簿における Seeking Support のドキュメントの作成につい
て、情報提供を行った。NAMA 登録簿の意義、必要性として、プロ
ジェクト実施に必要な資金調達のための情報発信の役割があること
を説明した。
・道路プロジェクトについては、参考となる適切な CDM 方法論がない
ことから、方法論を探す必要があり、様々なオプションについて議論
を行った。
2-31
セルビア国国としての適切な緩和行動(NAMA)能力開発プロジェクト
第 14 回
参加者
テーマ
ディスカッション
のポイント
第 15 回
参加者
テーマ
ディスカッション
のポイント
第 16 回
参加者
テーマ
ディスカッション
のポイント
第 17 回
参加者
テーマ
ディスカッション
のポイント
プロジェクト業務完了報告書
2012/09/21
全体：7 名
（MEDEP：1 名、セルビア電力公社：2 名、JICA 専門家チーム：4 名）
小水力発電所の新規建設プロジェクトについて
小水力発電所の新規建設プロジェクトについて、セルビア電力公社の担
当者と会議を行った。
・ NAMA 登録簿における Seeking Support のドキュメントの作成につい
て、MEDEP 側から情報提供を行った。
・本プロジェクトではセルビア電力公社側で F/S 等を行っていること
から、準備についてのサポートは必要としていないことから、NAMA
Seeking Support Form については Implementation のみを用意すること
が合意された。
・ NAMA ショートディスクリプションの重要性について、最も重要な
部分は支援ニーズについて記載する箇所である旨を説明し、技術移転
を行った。
2012/09/21
全体：10 名
（MEDEP：2 名、JICA 専門家チーム：4 名）
小規模バイオマスボイラーの導入プログラムの NAMA ショートディスク
リプションの修正について
小規模バイオマスボイラーの導入プログラムの NAMA ショートディスク
リプションの作成について、担当者に技術移転を行った。
・想定されるバイオマスボイラーの数量についての計算根拠について、
推計を用いて算出されたことを確認した。
・バイオマスの種類については、セルビア国内で実施された調査から得
られた情報であることを確認した。
・ NAMA ショートディスクリプションに記載する項目として、省の役
割、他の関係自治体、ボイラー所有者の役割についても記載する必要
がある旨説明した。
・ NAMA 登録簿に提出する文書の作成のポイントについて技術移転を
行った。
2012/09/21
全体：7 名
（MEMSP：1 名、SEEA：2 名、JICA 専門家チーム：4 名）
公共施設におけるエネルギー効率向上プロジェクト（SEEP）のショート
ディスクリプションの修正について
公共施設におけるエネルギー効率向上プロジェクト（SEEP）のショート
ディスクリプションの修正、修正について、SEEA 担当者を訪問し、技術
移転を行った。
・ SEEP プロジェクト及びエネルギー効率向上に関係する改築のライセ
ンス取得、許認可及び設計のプロセスについて情報共有を行った。
・ NAMA 登録簿に提出する文書としては、Preparation と Implementation
の両方について作成することを確認した。
・ NAMA ショートディスクリプションに、現在の財務分析結果、各関
係機関の役割分担及び世界銀行による次期のプロジェクト関連する
進捗状況を記載するよう指導した。
2012/09/27
全体：8 名
（MEMSP：1 名、セルビア電力公社：2 名、JICA 専門家チーム：5 名）
TPP Nikola Tesla Unit B3 超臨界型褐炭火力発電所建設についての NAMA
ショートディスクリプションの修正と情報の共有について
TPP Nikola Tesla Unit B3 超臨界型褐炭火力発電所建設についての NAMA
ショートディスクリプションの修正と情報の共有について、セルビア電
力公社の担当者を訪問し、情報共有と技術移転を行った。
・ NAMA Seeking Support form を改めて説明し、Preparation も作成対象
とすることを確認した。
・ NAMA ショートディスクリプションの修正点について説明し、技術
移転を行った。具体的には、データソースの明確化、地図の修正、プ
ロジェクト Lifetime の修正、及び財務情報の修正についてである。
2-32
セルビア国国としての適切な緩和行動(NAMA)能力開発プロジェクト
第 18 回
参加者
テーマ
ディスカッション
のポイント
第 19 回
参加者
テーマ
ディスカッション
のポイント
第 20 回
参加者
テーマ
ディスカッション
のポイント
第 21 回
参加者
テーマ
ディスカッション
・ GHG 排出削減量算定方法は JICA 専門家チームが CDM 方法論の
ACM0013 及び J-MRV 方法論の複数オプションを整理・提示した。そ
のうえで、セルビア電力公社内で協議・決定することを確認した。
・新発電所の発電効率について協議を行った。
2012/10/09
全体：9 名
（MEMSP：1 名、MOT：1 名、セルビア道路公社：2 名、JICA 専門家チ
ーム：5 名）
幹線道路の路面改修プロジェクトのショートディスクリプションのドラ
フトの修正及びモニタリング項目について
幹線道路の路面改修プロジェクトのショートディスクリプションのドラ
フト修正について、以下の項目について協議し、技術移転を行った。
・作成依頼及び財務情報の提供について対象道路を 19 箇所にすること
を確認した。なお、状況に応じて対象を見直しする。
・大気汚染物質、IRI については、機材があり定期的なモニタリングが
可能である。なお、CO2 濃度についてはクロスチェックとしての活
用となる可能性がある。
・ GHG 排出削減量の算定方法、モニタリング項目については、ベース
ラインでの排出量とプロジェクト排出量と継続して方法が変化しな
いようにすべきであることを確認した。計算手法としては IRI を用い
た算定方法とすることを確認した。
2012/10/12
全体：10 名（MEMSP：3 名、JICA 専門家チーム：3 名）
公共施設におけるエネルギー効率向上プロジェクト（SEEP）のショート
ディスクリプションの修正
公共施設におけるエネルギー効率向上プロジェクト（SEEP）のショート
ディスクリプションの修正として、SEEA 担当者を訪問し、技術移転を行
った。
・プロジェクト排出量は、新建物省エネ基準、現在の技術水準にあわせ
た効率に見直すことで合意した。（建物省エネ基準を作成した MCU
に確認する。
）
・ NAMA 登録簿に記載する資金のサポートの選択を増やすこと、及び
Preparation に係るコストについても、新しい単価で再度見直すことを
指導した。
・モニタリングについては、プロジェクト全体の 25 年について 2 年ご
とに行うべきである旨説明した。
・ NAMA ショートディスクリプションについて持続可能な発展の部分
についても加筆するよう指導した。
2012/10/22
全体：8 名
（MEDEP：2 名、GIZ：1 名、JICA バルカン事務所：2 名、JICA 専門家チ
ーム：4 名）
小規模バイオマスボイラーの導入プログラムに関連する GIZ のバイオマ
スプロジェクトとの調整
GIZ のバイオマスプロジェクトとの調整として、情報共有の会議を行っ
た。
・ NAMA の説明と、GIZ バイオマスプロジェクトの説明をそれぞれ実
施した。GIZ のバイオマスプロジェクトは 2013 年からスタートし、
化石燃料からバイオマスへの変換、キャパシティディベロップメント
を主たる活動としている。最終目標はバイオマス市場の構築が目的で
ある。
・ NAMA ショートディスクリプションの作成にあたり、バイオマスボ
イラーの位置、バイオマス供給源からの距離、移動に係るコスト等情
報が必要であり、今後も連絡を取り合うことを確認した。
2012/10/12
全体：10 名
（MEDEP：1 名、MCU：2 名、GIZ：2 名、JICA 専門家チーム：5 名）
既存住宅の改善、改修（ドア、窓、断熱）を通じた暖房効率向上プロジ
ェクトでの GIZ の建物インベントリ作成プロジェクトとの調整
GIZ の建物インベントリ作成プロジェクトとの調整として、情報共有の
2-33
セルビア国国としての適切な緩和行動(NAMA)能力開発プロジェクト
のポイント
第 22 回
参加者
テーマ
ディスカッション
のポイント
第 23 回
参加者
テーマ
ディスカッション
のポイント
第 24 回
参加者
テーマ
ディスカッション
のポイント
プロジェクト業務完了報告書
会議を行った。
・ GIZ の建物インベントリ作成プロジェクトでは、30 都市をまわり情
報を建物ストックの情報を収集し、47 タイプの分類を行っている。
また、エネルギーパスポートを発行し、現在のエネルギー消費量及び
推奨される改善改修について記載している。
・ GIZ のプロジェクトでの GHG 削減量の計算は実測ではなく推計値に
基づくものであることが確認された。GIZ プロジェクトでのエネルギ
ー消費量の計算については実測に基づくことになるという見通しで
ある。
2012/10/24
全体：8 名
（MEDEP：1 名、TPP Nikola Tesla Unit B3：2 名、JICA 専門家チーム：5
名）
TPP Nikola Tesla Unit B3 超臨界型褐炭火力発電所建設プロジェクトにつ
いての NAMA ショートディスクリプションの作成のための情報共有の会
議及び現場見学
TPP Nikola Tesla Unit B3 について、情報共有の会議及び現場見学を行っ
た。
・ TPP Nikola Tesla Unit B3 について諸元の説明および NAMA の説明を
それぞれ実施した。
・モニタリングのための石炭計量兼品質調査装置について説明を受け、
実際の制御室を見学した。
2012/10/29
全体：10 名
（MEDEP：2 名、SIEPA：2 名、JICA 専門家チーム：3 名）
NAMA プロジェクトに関する投資促進についてセルビア投資輸出促進庁
との面談
NAMA プロジェクトに関する投資促進についてセルビア投資輸出促進庁
との面談を行なった。
・ NAMA プロジェクトのショートリスト 16 件について説明を実施し
た。
・省エネルギー分野及び環境分野について、SIEPA は促進のための活動
を行っておらず、製造業及びサービス業についてインセンティブプロ
グラムを実施している。NAMA ショートリストのプログラムについ
ても、雇用創出に寄与することがわかればインセンティブが適用でき
るだろう。
・セルビアには 700 万ユーロのプロジェクトを運営できる国内企業は
なく、回収期間も 5 年程度が限度となり、厳しいだろうとの見方であ
る。
2012/10/31
全体：5 名
（セルビア道路公社：1 名、JICA 専門家チーム：3 名）
幹線道路の路面改修プロジェクトのショートディスクリプションのドラ
フトの修正及びモニタリング項目について
セルビア道路公社の担当者を訪問し、ショートディスクリプションのド
ラフトの修正について議論し、技術移転を行った。
・修正箇所及び GHG 削減量計算についての方法論について、JICA 専門
家チームから修正内容について説明を行った。
・入手が必要なデータとして挙げられた道路長、制限速度、平均走行速
度、年間車両交通量についてはセルビア道路公社側で準備できる旨の
説明があった。
・燃料消費量の計算については、COPERT モデルを用いた計算式の案を
JICA 専門家チームから例示した。セルビア道路公社としては IRI の
計算式が走行速度と相関関係があることを説明した。JICA 専門家チ
ームは Tier 3 の方式を推奨し、これにあわせ 5 つの車種カテゴリー分
けを行うことが確認された。また、IRI の改善が GHG 排出量削減に
つながるオプション 1 を選択することを確認した。
2-34
セルビア国国としての適切な緩和行動(NAMA)能力開発プロジェクト
第 25 回
参加者
テーマ
ディスカッション
のポイント
第 26 回
参加者
テーマ
ディスカッション
のポイント
第 27 回
参加者
テーマ
ディスカッション
のポイント
2012/11/27
全体：7 名
（MEDEP：3 名、JICA 専門家チーム：4 名）
公共施設におけるエネルギー効率向上プロジェクト（SEEP）のショート
ディスクリプションの修正
公共施設におけるエネルギー効率向上プロジェクト（SEEP）のショート
ディスクリプションの修正として、SEEA 担当者を訪問し技術移転を行っ
た。
・提出された NAMA ショートディスクリプションでは GHG 削減計算
量に差があることがわかった。これは入力データの間違いによるもの
であり、実際の改善が行われる前までの想定値として取り扱うべきで
ある。
・エネルギー管理士制度の導入について意見交換を行った。
・既に導入されているエネルギーパスポート制度についても、NAMA
ショートディスクリプションで記載するよう提案した。
2012/11/29
全体：9 名
（MEDEP：1 名、MCU：2 名、GIZ：2 名、JICA 専門家チーム：4 名）
既存住宅の改善、改修（ドア、窓、断熱）を通じた暖房効率向上プロジ
ェクトでの NAMA ショートディスクリプションの修正について
既存住宅の改善、改修（ドア、窓、断熱）を通じた暖房効率向上プロジ
ェクトでのショートディスクリプション作成に関する会議を開催し技術
移転を行った。
・ NAMA ショートディスクリプションの中で言及のあるインセンティ
ブプログラムについて、ファンドの現状についての確認を行った。担
当者によると対象となった建物の総数等不明であることから、投資家
にとっては大変重要であり明らかにするよう依頼した。
・ GHG 削減量の算出についてはエネルギーパスポート制度のオンライ
ン登録システムの使用及び改良により 2013 年以降確認できる見込み
であることを確認した。
・ NAMA ショートディスクリプションについて、GHG 削減量の計算の
部分及びコベネの部分について、加筆するよう説明した。
・本プロジェクトでの資金としては、オーナーの資金、国からの援助及
びローンが考えられることを確認した。
2012/12/13
全体：6 名
（MEDEP：1 名、MCU：2 名、JICA 専門家チーム：3 名）
既存住宅の改善、改修（ドア、窓、断熱）を通じた暖房効率向上プロジ
ェクトでの NAMA ショートディスクリプションの修正について
既存住宅の改善、改修（ドア、窓、断熱）を通じた暖房効率向上プロジ
ェクトでのショートディスクリプション作成に関する会議を開催し技術
移転を行った。
・ NAMA ショートディスクリプションに記載するモニタリング計画に
ついて、モニタリング実施体制およびモニタリング項目について協議
を行った。
・ NAMA 登録簿申請フォームのうち、資金の支援に関する財源オプシ
ョンについて、技術移転を行い、各オプションの可能性について協議
を行った。
2-35
セルビア国国としての適切な緩和行動(NAMA)能力開発プロジェクト
写真１
ワーキンググループの様子１
写真３
写真２
個別協議の様子１
プロジェクト業務完了報告書
ワーキンググループの様子２
写真４
個別協議の様子２
2.3.2 NAMA ガイドラインの作成
「セ」国の関係者が広く NAMA/MRV に関する知識を深めるとともに、NAMA の実現を促
進するため、「セ」国の NAMA ガイドライン（英語名：NAMA Development Guideline of the
Republic of Serbia）を作成した。
NAMA ガイドラインの作成は、C/P と JICA 専門家チームが共同で行い、ワーキンググルー
プ参加者からも意見を募った。
ガイドラインには、「セ」国で今後 NAMA を実施しようとする省庁・機関が必要とする情
報として、NAMA ショートリスト化のポイント、NAMA ショートディスクリプション作成
のポイント、MRV の概要、そして財務分析と財源オプションに関する情報が含まれる。
NAMA ガイドラインの内容は以下の通りである。
-
NAMA 設立の背景、定義、利点
NAMA 開発手順

ショートリスト化のポイント（選定基準の解説）

NAMA ショートディスクリプション作成のポイント

GHG 排出削減量計算に用いられる方法論
2-36
セルビア国国としての適切な緩和行動(NAMA)能力開発プロジェクト

-
財務・経済分析の概要と財源オプション
NAMA-MRV の概要

NAMA の MRV

既存の MRV システムの概要
添付資料

NAMA ショートディスクリプションのサンプル

NAMA ショートリスト
本ガイドラインでターゲットとする主な読者は、「セ」国の気候変動緩和関係者で、今後様々
なセクターで NAMA を計画、実施、あるいは管轄する政府省庁・機関、地方自治体、その
他事業実施者であるが、ドナー機関、投資家に対しても「セ」国の取り組み状況を知らせる
ため、ガイドラインはセルビア語と英語で併記した。
本ガイドラインは、3 年次に実施したバルカン地域 NAMA セミナーにおいて、セルビア関係
者、周辺国からの参加者、ドナー・国際機関に対して配布された。
NAMA 開発ガイドラインを添付資料 9（セルビア語版）および添付資料 10（英語版）に示
す。
2.3.3 財務分析ワークショップの実施
「セ」国関係者の財務分析・経済分析実施能力の向上及び NAMA 文書作成能力の向上を図
るため、ワークショップ等を通じて技術移転活動を実施した。
本プロジェクトにおいて NAMA 候補の基礎情報を収集するにあたって、緩和活動の財務分
析・経済分析結果に関する情報を入手しようとしたところ、多くのプロジェクトで分析その
ものが行われていなかったり、経済計算は行われているが適切な計算方法が採られていなか
ったりするなど、多くの課題が明らかになった。
これに対応するため、将来 NAMA 実施者となる可能性のある関連省庁・機関に対して、気
候変動緩和策の財務分析・経済分析の手法に関するワークショップを行った。
第一回目は 2011 年 12 月 13 日に、第二回目は 2012 年 6 月 28 日に実施し、参加者はそれぞれ
24 名、22 名であった。ワーキンググループ参加機関の代表者の他に、ショートリスト化さ
れた NAMA の事業実施機関から財務部局に所属するスタッフ等が参加した。参加者を下表
に示す。
2-37
セルビア国国としての適切な緩和行動(NAMA)能力開発プロジェクト
プロジェクト業務完了報告書
表 12 財務ワークショップ参加者
所属
JICA Balkan Office
Ministry of
Environment, Mining
and Spatial Planning
(MEMSP)
Ministry of
Infrastructure and
Energy (MIE)
Serbian Energy
Efficiency Agency
(SEEA)
Electric Power
Industry of Serbia
(EPS)
氏名
Yumiko Saito
Danijela Bozanic
Jasminka Pavlovic
Ana Repac
Dragana Radulovic
Dragisa Nikolic
Aleksandar Pavlovic
Milena Djakonovic
Bojan Kovacic
Dimitrije Lilic
Vesna Rodic
Natasa Cakarmis
Mihajlo Gavric
Miroslav Spasojevic
Dragan Vukotic
Zdravko Milinovic
Beogradske elektrane
Petar Vasiljevic
Dusanka Prodanovic
Vesna Koncar
Roads of Serbia
Mimoza Jelic
Igor Radovic
Ivana Kostic
District Heating
Company Valjevo
Djordje Mitrovic
Dragana Nesic
Katarina Munjic
部署・職位
Project Formulation Officer
Head of Climate Change Division
Head of Building Department
Junior Advisor in Climate Change Division
Junior Advisor in Climate Change Division
Advisor in Climate Change Division
Advisor in International Public Transport
Department
Junior Advisor in Department for
Sustainable Development
Deputy Director
Advisor in Energy Efficiency in Building
Stock
Advisor in Energy Efficiency in Industry
Environmental Protection Sector Manager
Advisor in Environmental Protection Sector
Senior Engineer in Head Department for
Strategy and Investment
Chief Economist in Head Department for
Strategy and Investment
General Manager Assistant
Independent Project Designer in Group for
Environmental Protection Management
Project designer in Group for Environmental
Protection Management
Expert Assistant in Department for
Environmental Protection
Chief Engineer in Sector for Investments
Chief Engineer for Strategic Planning in
Sector for Strategy, Designing and
Development
Chief Accountant
Engineer
なお、これらのワークショップに加えて、JICA 専門家チームは NAMA 実施機関と個別に協
議を行ない、各 NAMA の財務分析・経済分析の支援や、結果の分析方法に関する技術移転、
NAMA の財源オプションに関する情報など、技術的な支援を行った。
財務分析ワークショップの内容を以下に述べる。
1)
第 1 回財務分析ワークショップ
本ワークショップでカバーした内容は以下のとおりである。これまで財務分析を行ったこと
のない参加者も想定して、入門的なトピックを中心に選定した。
2-38
セルビア国国としての適切な緩和行動(NAMA)能力開発プロジェクト
1. 概要：
投資案件の評価分析
(a) 商業面から見た収益性、国にとっての便益（財務分析、経済分析）
(b) 経済分析、価格調整、経済的便益の基礎
2. 財務分析の基本コンセプト
(a) プロジェクトコスト構造での損益分岐点
(b) 利率、複利、キャッシュフローの割引率
3. 財務分析手法
(a) 投資収益率と財務諸表分析
(b) 単利法と割引キャッシュフロー手法
(c) キャッシュフローモデルと工業サブセクター
(d) 正味現在価値（NPV）
(e) 内部収益率（IRR）
本ワークショップを通じて、財務・経済分析を行った経験のない参加者は基礎的な知識を得
ることができ、また、すでに経験がある程度ある参加者については更に NAMA の財務・経
済分析方法とポイントに関する理解が深まったと考えられる。
また、参加者の理解を更に促進するため、参加者に演習問題を出し、回答してもらうととも
に、今後取り扱って欲しい議題についてコメントを収拾した。
2)
第 2 回財務分析ワークショップ
本ワークショップでは、第一回ワークショップでの財務分析、経済分析についての復習を行
い、その後ショートリストの NAMA プロジェクトについてキャッシュフロー・便益コスト
等についての解説を行い、あわせて、PC とエクセルを使用して演習問題を実施し、より具
体的な技術移転を行った。本ワークショップでカバーした内容を以下に示す。
1. 第一回ワークショップの復習：
投資プロジェクトの評価
(a) 商業面から見た収益性、国にとっての便益（財務分析、経済分析）
(b) 経済分析、価格調整、経済的便益の基礎
(c) 単利法と割引キャッシュフロー手法
2. 財務分析の例
3. サンプルを用いた財務分析の演習
具体的な案件を例として使用し、また建設費の上昇、電力収入の減少といったケースの IRR
への影響等をエクセルを使ってキャッシュフローで実際に示すことで、参加者がキャッシュ
フローが投資家にとって役に立つ理由をより具体的に理解できるように配慮した。この他、
サンプルを用いて演習課題に取組むことで理解の深化を図った。各自に PC を持参してきて
もらい、参加者が実際に手を動かして問題に取組むことができ、かつ、個別の質問も多く具
2-39
セルビア国国としての適切な緩和行動(NAMA)能力開発プロジェクト
プロジェクト業務完了報告書
体的な技術移転を行うことができた。
これら二回にわたるワークショップを通じて、NAMA プロジェクト実施者が、自らエクセ
ル等を使ってキャッシュフロー分析がある程度できるように着実にレベルアップできてお
り、NAMA ショートディスクリプション作成時にも、本知見は活用された。
写真５
2.4
財務分析ワークショップ１
写真６
財務分析ワークショップ２
成果 4：NAMA の認知度向上能力の強化支援
「セ」国内の NAMA に関する認知度の向上を図るため、各種活動を行い C/P の NAMA プロ
モーション能力の強化を図った。
2.4.1 ウェブサイトの整備
本プロジェクトに関する情報を国内外に発信するとともに、「セ」国内の NAMA 関係者の
NAMA・MRV に関する認知度・理解度を向上させることを目的として、C/P が所属する省庁
であるエネルギー鉱業国土計画省（MEMSP）（作成時）のウェブサイトの整備を行った。
新たに整備したウェブコンテンツとして、本プロジェクトの紹介（目的、期待される成果、
活動実績等）、NAMA と MRV の概要やメリット、本プロジェクトで開発、採用した NAMA
開発の手順等について、C/P のウェブサイトに追加した。コンテンツの選定および作成は気
候変動課が中心となって行い、JICA 専門家チームは技術的なアドバイスを提供した。なお、
ウェブの閲覧者は「セ」国の関係者にとどまらず、海外の気候変動関係者も閲覧することを
想定し、全てのコンテンツは英語とセルビア語両方で作成した。
2-40
セルビア国国としての適切な緩和行動(NAMA)能力開発プロジェクト
図５
旧 MEMSP ウェブサイト（英語およびセルビア語）
2012 年の省庁再編により、気候変動課の所属する省庁が、エネルギー鉱業国土計画省
（MEMSP）からエネルギー・開発・環境保護省（MEDEP）に変わったことは前述したが、
再編以降、MEDEP のウェブサイトも刷新された。これに伴い、2013 年 2 月現在、同ウェブ
サイトの他のコンテンツ同様に、上記で作成したコンテンツが MEDEP のウェブサイトに掲
載されていない状況にある。
C/P によると、同コンテンツが MEDEP のサイトにアップされる時期については未定となっ
ているものの、サイトが開設されたら、本活動で作成した NAMA ガイドラインや NAMA シ
ョートディスクリプション等のプロモーション文書を公開し、内外への発信を再開するとし
ている。
2.4.2 COP サイドイベントの実施
1)
COP17 でのサイドイベントの実施
本プロジェクトの成果の発信ならびに「セ」国の NAMA 情報の発信を、海外の気候変動緩
和関係者に対して行うことを目的として、2011 年 11 月～12 月に南アフリカのダーバンで開
かれた COP 17（第 17 回締約国会議）において、サイドイベントセミナーを C/P と共同で計
画、実施した。
サイドイベントは COP 17 のメイン会場の横にある、気候変動エキスポ会場内の Marquee パ
ビリオン Umgeni 会議室で行った。参加者は 32 名であった。プログラムは以下のとおり。
2-41
セルビア国国としての適切な緩和行動(NAMA)能力開発プロジェクト
表 13
プロジェクト業務完了報告書
COP 17 サイドイベントプラグラム（＊所属はサイドイベント開催時のもの）
13:00 – 13:05
Opening remarks
Ms. Danijela Bozanic
Head of Climate Change Division
Ministry of Environment, Mining and Spatial Planning, Republic of Serbia
Mr. Hideaki Matsuoka
Deputy Director of Environmental Management Division 2
Environmental Management Group, Global Environmental Department
Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA)
Presentations
Facilitator: Ms. Ana Repac
Junior Advisor, Climate Change Division
Ministry of Environment, Mining and Spatial Planning, Republic of Serbia
13:05 – 13:15
13:15 – 13:35
13:35 – 13:55
13:55 – 14:35
14:35 – 14:40
Introduction and Outcome of JICA Technical Cooperation Project
“Capacity Development Project on Nationally Appropriate Mitigation Actions
(NAMAs) in the Republic of Serbia”
Mr. Masahiko Fujimoto
Chief Advisor of JICA Expert Team
“Advantages and barriers in developing NAMAs in an MRV manner –
Republic of Serbia”
Ms. Danijela Bozanic
Head of Climate Change Division
Ministry of Environment, Mining and Spatial Planning, Republic of Serbia
“Example of Serbian NAMAs”
Mr. Mihajlo Gavric
Manager of Environmental Protection Sector
Public Enterprise Electric Power Industry of Serbia (EPS)
Q&A
Closing Remarks
サイドイベントでは、本技術協力プロジェクトの目的と活動の紹介の後、C/P の気候変動課
より、本プロジェクトで構築したセルビアの NAMA 開発プロセスと、NAMA ショートリス
トに関する発表があった。加えて、ショートリストの大部分を占めるセルビア電力公社（EPS）
のエネルギー関連の NAMA について、概要の説明が行われた。
参加者からは、「セ」国の MRV 体制やキャパシティ、周辺国と今回の成果をシェアする可
能性、NAMA の財務状況や事業実施機関に関する質問やコメントが多く出るなど、活発な
議論が行われた。
2-42
セルビア国国としての適切な緩和行動(NAMA)能力開発プロジェクト
写真７
2)
気候変動課による発表
写真８
サイドイベント風景
COP18 でのサイドイベント
2012 年 11 月～12 月に実施された COP18 について、C/P から COP 事務局に対してサイドイ
ベント開催の申請をしたが、却下された。理由は、近年のサイドイベント申し込み者数の増
加と、サイドイベントの機会をより NGO に与えるためと考えられる。
これを受けて、メイン会場外のホテル等でのイベント実施を検討したが、メイン会場外では
一定の参加者数を確保することが困難と判断し、C/P とも協議の上、COP18 でのサイドイベ
ントは実施しないこととし、活動成果の発表の場として、セルビア国内 NAMA セミナーを
拡大する形でバルカン地域 NAMA セミナーを実施した。
同地域セミナーの内容と結果については次項に示す。
2.4.3 NAMA セミナーの計画と実施
1)
セルビア国内 NAMA セミナー
「セ」国の NAMA 関係者に対して、本プロジェクトの成果を発信するとともに、「セ」国
関係者の NAMA に対する認知度・理解度の向上を図ることを目的として、NAMA セミナー
を 2012 年 2 月 6 日にベオグラード市で実施した。本セミナーは、JICA、MEMSP（当時）、
そして会場を提供したセルビア商工会議所の共催で実施した。
セミナーの計画を策定するにあたって、C/P と協議を重ね、本セミナーの目的やターゲット
とする参加者についてまず明確化した上で、セミナープログラムを組んだ。セミナーでは、
JICA 専門家による発表だけでなく、技術協力プロジェクトの成果を、C/P である気候変動課、
さらにワーキンググループに参加する NAMA 関連省庁・機関に発表をしてもらうこととし
た。セミナープログラムを以下に示す。
2-43
セルビア国国としての適切な緩和行動(NAMA)能力開発プロジェクト
プロジェクト業務完了報告書
表 14 セルビア国内 NAMA セミナー：プログラム
Time
Topic
Speaker
Part I: Implementation of the project of NAMA development in Serbia –
Ms. Vera Raznatovic, Association for Energy, Mining, Chamber of Commerce of Serbia
10:00 – 10:20
Introductory remarks
-
Mr. Bojan Djuric
State Secretary, Ministry of Environment, Mining
and Spatial Planning
-
His Excellency Mr. Toshio Tsunozaki
Ambassador of Japan
-
Mr. Satoru Kurosawa
Resident Representative, Japan International
Cooperation Agency Balkan Office
-
10:20 – 10:50
10:50 – 11:20
11:20 – 12:00
Overview and update of
NAMA/ MRV
Activities related to the
implementation of the
NAMA Project
NAMA development process
in Serbia and outcome
Mr. Aleksandar Peric, Advisor to the President of
Serbian Chamber of Commerce
Mr. Fujimoto Masahiko
Chief Advisor of JICA Expert Team
Ms. Danijela Bozanic
Head of Climate Change Division, Ministry of
Environment, Mining and Spatial Planning
Mr. Tetsuya Yoshida
Deputy Chief Advisor of JICA Expert Team
12:15 – 13:30
Lunch break
Part II: Identified NAMAs in Serbia – Ms. Ana Repac,
Climate Change Division, Ministry of Environment, Mining and Spatial Planning
Identified NAMAs in energy Mr. Miroslav Spasojevic
13:30 – 14:00
sector
PE EPS
Identified NAMAs in
Ms. Jasminka Pavlovic, Ministry of Environment,
14:30 – 15:00
building sector
Mining and Spatial Planning
Identified NAMAs in
Mr. Igor Radovic
15:00 – 15:30
transport sector
PE Roads of Serbia
セミナーには、「セ」国の NAMA 関係省庁・機関に加え、ドナー・国際機関、大学、民間
企業や NGO、報道機関などから合計 62 名の参加があった。
発表は、JICA 専門家チームによる NAMA／MRV の概要および国際交渉の経緯に関する発表、
さらに NAMA 策定手順とこれまでの結果の発表に続いて、C/P の気候変動課によって本プロ
ジェクトの成果の発表が行われた。さらに、ショートリスト化された NAMA の実施者であ
る「セ」国の省庁・機関が、それぞれの NAMA について、活動の背景と目的、概要や GHG
排出削減計算方法、現況と支援ニーズなどについて発表を行った。
当日は、参加者から、ショートリスト化された NAMA の内容について、GHG 削減量の計算
方法や MRV について質問があるなど、活発な議論が行われた。
2-44
セルビア国国としての適切な緩和行動(NAMA)能力開発プロジェクト
写真９
写真 11
2)
セミナーオープニング
写真 10 気候変動課による発表
NAMA 実施者による発表
写真 12 セミナー風景
バルカン地域 NAMA セミナー
第二回目の国内 NAMA セミナーは、前述したとおり、COP サイドイベントを行う代わりに、
周辺国から気候変動関係者を招待し、地域セミナーとした。
本バルカン地域 NAMA セミナーでは、①本プロジェクトの成果の共有、②ドナー・国際機
関へのセルビア NAMA の紹介、③C/P 及び本プロジェクトに参加する「セ」国関係者のキャ
パシティ向上、④「セ」国のバルカン地域における NAMA の策定及び促進、地域での連携
を図るための基盤づくりとその支援、の 4 つを目的として実施した。
セミナーは 2013 年 2 月 4 日および 5 日の二日間にわたって、ベオグラード市の国会議事堂
で実施した。
一回目の NAMA セミナーと同様に、本セミナーでは、発表を JICA 専門家だけでなく、C/P
である気候変動課やセルビアの NAMA 関連省庁・機関、さらに、周辺国の NAMA 関連省庁
の代表者にしてもらうようにプログラムを組んだ。
セミナープログラムを以下に示す。
2-45
セルビア国国としての適切な緩和行動(NAMA)能力開発プロジェクト
プロジェクト業務完了報告書
表 15 バルカン地域 NAMA セミナー：プログラム
Time
Topic
Speaker
（1 日目）Presentation of Serbian NAMAs to the stakeholders
9:30 – 10:00
10:00 – 10:30
Registration
Opening remarks
-
Mr Dejan Trifunovic,
Assistant Minister, Ministry of Energy,
Development and Environmental Protection
-
His Excellency Mr Toshio Tsunozaki
Ambassador of Japan
-
Mr Toshiya Abe, Resident Representative of Japan
International Cooperation Agency Balkan Office
10:30 – 11:00
Coffee break
Part I: Results of NAMA Projects
11:00 – 11:15
Introduction of JICA
Technical Cooperation
Project
11:15-11:45
Importance of NAMAs
Projects
11:45 – 12:15
Importance of financial
analysis and finance
options for Serbian
NAMAs
12:15 – 12:45
Experience in development
of NAMAs in Energy
sector
-
Mr Masahiko Fujimoto,
Chief Advisor JICA Expert Team
-
Ms Ana Repac, Climate Change Division, Ministry
of Energy, Development and Environmental
Protection
-
Mr Hiroshi Matsuoka, JICA Expert Team
-
Mr Miroslav Spasojevic,
Public Enterprise Electric Power Industry of Serbia
(EPS)
12:45 – 13:15
Q & A session
13:15 – 14:30
Lunch break
Part II: Introduction of Serbian NAMAs
14:30 – 15:00
Experience in development
of NAMAs in Energy
Sector
Mr Predrag Milanovic
Ministry of Energy, Development and Environmental
Protection
15:00 – 15:30
Experience in development
of NAMAs in Building
Sector
Ms. Nina Vukosavljević
Ministry of Construction and Urbanism
15:30 – 16:00
Experience in development
of NAMAs in Building
Sector
Mr Dimitrije Lilic
Ministry of Energy, Development and Environmental
Protection
2-46
セルビア国国としての適切な緩和行動(NAMA)能力開発プロジェクト
Time
16:00 – 16:30
Topic
Experience in
development
of NAMAs in Transport
sector
Speaker
Mr Igor Radovic
Public Enterprise Roads of Serbia
16:30 – 17:00
Q & A session
（2 日目）Experience and presentation of NAMAs from the Region Countries
-
Ms Danijela Bozanic, Head of Climate Change
Division, Ministry of Energy, Development and
Environmental Protection
09:00 – 09:30
Introductory remarks
09:30 – 10:00
Republic of Serbia
Ms Danijela Bozanic
Ministry of Energy, Development and Environmental Protection
10:00 – 10:30
Republic of Albania
Ms Enkelejda Malaj, Mr Rrezart Fshazi
Ministry of Environment, Forests and Water Administration
10:30 – 11:00
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Ms Almira Kapetanovic, Federal Ministry of Environment and Tourism
Mr Ozren Laganin, Ministry of Spatial Planning, Civil Engineering and Ecology of
the Republic of Srpska
11:00 – 11:30
Republic of Montenegro
Mr Djordjije Vulikic, Mr Andrej Lakic
Ministry of Sustainable Development and Tourism
11:30 – 12:00
Republic of Macedonia
Ms Daniela Rendevska, Ms Saska Brblic
Ministry of Environment and Physical Planning
12:00 – 13:30
Working lunch – exchange of ideas for possible future regional cooperation
本セミナーには、「セ」国の NAMA 関係省庁・機関として、MEDEP、外務省、建設都市計
画省、司法省からの参加があったほか、ドナー・国際機関として UNDP、EU、GIZ、KfW、
スウェーデン、また、大学、民間セクター、NGO からも参加があった。参加者数は、1 日目
が 73 名、2 日目が 37 名で、2 日間で合計 110 名の参加があった（セミナー参加者は添付資
料 11 を参照）。
1 日目の発表は、JICA 専門家チームによる本プロジェクトの概要に関する発表の後、C/P に
よるプロジェクトの成果の発表が行われた。その後、ショートディスクリプション作成の対
象となった 6 件の NAMA について、NAMA 実施機関である「セ」国の省庁および公社が、
各 NAMA の概要や GHG 排出削減計算方法、モニタリング計画、支援ニーズ、NAMA 開発
の教訓などについて発表を行った（セミナー発表資料は添付資料 11 を参照）。これらの発
表に対して、参加者から、GHG 削減量の計算方法やデータ取得方法、MRV 体制等について
質問が上がり、活発な議論が見られた。
2-47
セルビア国国としての適切な緩和行動(NAMA)能力開発プロジェクト
プロジェクト業務完了報告書
2 日目は、周辺国から招待した気候変動緩和関係省庁の代表者による発表が行われ、各国に
おける気候変動政策・施策、現状と課題、NAMA に対する取り組み、そして気候変動分野
における支援のニーズに関する発表があった。周辺 4 カ国からの参加者を以下に示す。
表 16 バルカン地域 NAMA セミナー：周辺国からの参加者
国名
アルバニ
ア
氏名
Enkelejda Malaj
Rrezart Fshazi
ボスニ
ア・ヘルツ
ェゴビナ
マケドニ
ア
Ozren Laganin
役職
Director of Integration
and Projects Directory
Head of Integration Unit
Almira
Kapetanović
Federal Ministry of Environment
and Tourism
Senior Professional
Associate for Climate
Change and Ozone
Professional Associate,
Environment Department
Senad Oprasic
Ministry of Foreign Trade and
Economic Relations
Head of Environmental
Protection Department
Saška Brblic
Ministry of Environment and
Physical Planning
Ministry of Environment and
Physical Planning,
Ministry of Sustainable
Development and Tourism
Advisor for investments
Elena Gavrilova
モンテネ
グロ
所属
Ministry of Environment, Forests
and Water Administration
Ministry of Environment, Forests
and Water Administration
Ministry of spatial Planning, Civil
Engineering and Ecology
Djordjije Vulikic
Andrej Lakic
Ministry of Sustainable
Development and Tourism
Advisor in International
Cooperation and Climate
Change Department
Advisor in International
Cooperation and Climate
Change Department
各国の発表によると、気候変動対策は何れの国でも進んでおり、若干の差はあるものの、各
国ともに NAMA 開発に取り組んでいることが分かった。一方で、NAMA の開発に必要な資
金、人材とキャパシティが不足している国が多く見られ、本プロジェクトと同様の支援を受
けたいと言う声も聞かれた。
セルビアの C/P 気候変動課は、周辺国の気候変動関係者とは以前より交流があり、意見交換
を行っていたものの、本セミナーで行ったような、NAMA 開発に関する知見や経験、教訓
の共有は行ったことはなく、本セミナーを契機に NAMA 開発に関する周辺国間との関係構
築・維持が今後望まれる。
次ページに、周辺 4 カ国による発表内容の概要を示す。
2-48
マケドニ
ア
モンテネ
グロ
ボスニ
ア・ヘルツ
ェゴビナ
国名
アルバニ
ア
気候変動対策の現状
SNC が 2009 年に国連提出。
2012 年からは TNC に着手。
NC で言及された内容は国の政
策に反映されている。
-
2-49
NAMA・MRV の現状
正式に NAMA とはされていないが、エネルギー、交通
分野、土地利用変化、農業、廃棄物分野における具体
的な緩和策がある。
- EU 加盟に向けた地域環境ネットワークの取組みの中
で MRV システム構築が進んでいる。
- UNDP の支援で NAMA プロジェクトを実施予定。
- INC が 2009 年に国連提出され、 - 緩和策、NAMA に関しては、2025 年までに低炭素開発
GEF/UNDP の支援を受けて現在
戦略の実施と MRV、EU 加盟、UNFCCC 附属国 I 国化
は SNC を作成中。
に向けた組織・人材の能力強化に取り組む。
- 並行して低炭素開発戦略と適応 - 2020 年までに気候変動、エネルギー効率改善、環境分
戦略を準備中。
野の EU 法への転換と実施を計る。
- 2025 年までに supported NAMA 又は credited NAMAs を
少なくとも 10 件実施する、を目標としている。
- 具体的な緩和策については、エネルギー生成分野、建
物、熱供給、交通分野の省エネに加え、廃棄物管理、
森林と農業分野への拡大が考えられる。
- 気候変動分野に関する数値目標を伴う国家戦略がある（再生可能エネルギー推進等）。
- NAMA 選定に関する基準が構築されている。
- SNC の UNFCCC 提出の準備を進めている。これには NAMA や MRV に関する能力強化につい
ての内容を含んでいる。また少なくとも２つ優先 NAMA プロジェクトがある。
（再生可能エ
ネルギー分野）また建物分野における NAMA も準備中である。
- グリーン成長・気候変動分析提 - 現時点では、NAMA の定義や NAMA として実施され
言サポートプログラムが策定
ているプロジェクトはない。SNC では 5 分野の NAMA
中。
がリスト化されている（発電、工業・エネルギー転換・
熱、交通、廃棄物、農業・森林）
。
注
TNC
と
EU-ETS
に基づく
GHG
排出量の
MRV システム
INC: Initial National Communication
の導入ロードマップを策定中。
（第一次国別報告書）
- 隔年報告書が準備段階。TNC においては、エネルギー
SNC: Second National Communication
分野（交通と建物省エネ）と廃棄物に関する NAMA の
（第二次国別報告書）
記載を予定している。
TNC: Third National Communication
- GHG の MRV についての法整備が進められており、
（第三次国別報告書）
TNC の準備を通じて MRV システムが構築される。
-
NAMA ポテンシャルを判定するための能力強
化。
NAMA 提案を展開することに対する国際的な
支持と良い率先的なガイダンス。
NAMA 実施のための資金。
NAMA の MRV メカニズムの構築のための技術
支援。
-
-
-
発表なし
課題、支援ニーズ
緩和策の推進のために資金、技術移転、人材育
成・能力強化支援が必要。
まず、緩和策の分析と NAMA の認定のための能
力強化が必要であり、次いで NAMA 実施のため
の資金が必要である。
JICA の技術移転支援を期待。
今後は、緩和策の実施状況や GHG 排出量、緩
和策の評価や見直しのためのシステムを構築す
る必要がある。
NC 関連活動から、組織・人材の能力強化、乏
しい GHG 関連データ、EU 加盟ロードマップが
明確でない等の課題がある。
プロジェクト業務完了報告書
-
-
-
-
-
表 17 バルカン地域 NAMA セミナー：周辺国の NAMA を取り巻く状況
セルビア国国としての適切な緩和行動(NAMA)能力開発プロジェクト
セルビア国国としての適切な緩和行動(NAMA)能力開発プロジェクト
3)
プロジェクト業務完了報告書
写真 13 セミナーオープニング
写真 14 気候変動課による発表
写真 15 周辺国による発表
写真 16 セミナー風景
セミナーのフォローアップ
2 回に渡ってセルビアで実施した、上記セミナーのフォローアップとして、参加者にセミナ
ー当日に質問表を配布し、当該セミナーに参加したことで NAMA に対する理解度が向上し
たか否かを問うとともに、両セミナーの内容を評価してもらった。
それぞれの質問表の回答結果を下表に示す。質問は、5 段階で評価してもらう形式で、5 が
最も高い評価、1 が最も低い評価を示す（質問表は添付資料 11 を参照）。
2-50
セルビア国国としての適切な緩和行動(NAMA)能力開発プロジェクト
プロジェクト業務完了報告書
表 18 セルビア国内 NAMA セミナーフォローアップ結果
番号
評価
質問
1
2
3
4
本セミナーに参加してNAMA・MRVに関する知識が向上したか？
1
0
平均値
5
0
2
9
8
4.32
0
1
3
7
8
4.16
0
0
2
7
10
4.42
2 各発表に割り当てられた時間は適切だったか？
3 発表された内容は適切だったか？
4 本セミナーで得た知見を自身の職場で今後活用できるか？
0
0
6
4
8
4.11
0
0
0
9
10
4.53
5 本セミナーに対する総合評価
表 19 バルカン地域 NAMA セミナーフォローアップ結果
番号
評価
質問
1
2
3
4
平均値
5
1 本セミナーに参加してNAMA・MRVに関する知識が向上したか？
0
1
3
6
10
4.25
0
0
1
9
10
4.45
0
0
2
8
10
4.40
2 各発表に割り当てられた時間は適切だったか？
3 発表された内容は適切だったか？
4 本セミナーで得た知見を自身の職場で今後活用できるか？
0
0
3
8
9
4.30
0
0
1
8
10
4.47
5 本セミナーに対する総合評価
上表に示されたとおり、NAMA に関する知識が向上した（5 段階評価で 5 および 4）と回答
した参加者は両セミナーで 8 割を超え、まだ NAMA 認知度の低い「セ」国の関係者の知識
レベルの向上に両セミナーは貢献できたと考えられる。さらに、本セミナーで得た知識を、
今後自身の職場で活用できると回答した参加者も多数見られた。
本セミナーに対する総合評価も非常に高く、セミナーの運営は適切に行われたと考えられる。
また、今後 MEDEP、あるいはと JICA に NAMA に関するセミナーでカバーして欲しいトピ
ックを質問したところ、2 年次に実施した NAMA 国内セミナーへの参加者からは、プロジェ
2-51
セルビア国国としての適切な緩和行動(NAMA)能力開発プロジェクト
プロジェクト業務完了報告書
クト開発の手法や、GHG 削減量の計算方法、モニタリング方法などに関する要望が多かっ
た一方、3 年次に実施したバルカン地域 NAMA セミナーへの参加者からは、MRV 手法、特
にモニタリングと検証活動に関する要望が見られた。
2.4.4 プロモーション文書の作成
本プロジェクトでは、NAMA プロモーション文書として、以下の文書を作成し、セミナー
等を通じて関係者に広く配布した。
-
NAMA ロングリスト
-
NAMA ショートリスト
-
NAMA ポートフォリオ
-
NAMA ショートディスクリプション
-
NAMA ガイドライン
上記のうち、NAMA ポートフォリオは A4 サイズの紙 1 枚に各ショートリスト化された
NAMA の概要を纏めたものであり、想定されるコストや資金ソース、財務分析結果、プロ
ジェクト開始時期や GHG 排出削減量など、投資家が知りたい情報に加え、BAU シナリオや
MRV、持続可能な開発への貢献に関する情報など、投資家以外の関係者にも有用な情報を
盛り込んだ（NAMA ポートフォリオは添付資料７を参照）。
2.5
本邦研修の実施
本邦研修の実施にあたっては、C/P の意向及び研修参加者（C/P 気候変動課より 1 名、NAMA
実施機関より 3 名）の意向・専門分野を踏まえ、2012 年 10 月 28 日～11 月 10 日の約 2 週間
の研修プログラムを設定した。
内容は、行政における政策立案と、民間企業における省エネルギー技術見学を網羅するもの
であり、国・地方自治体レベルの行政関係者、民間企業から講師を迎えた。
研修参加者からは、現場で取り組む方から直接話を聞くことでより理解が深まった、セルビ
アが将来目指すべき方向性についてのヒントが得られた等の声があり、非常に有意義な研修
となった。
研修の内容の詳細については、以下に示すとおりである。
2-52
セルビア国国としての適切な緩和行動(NAMA)能力開発プロジェクト
プロジェクト業務完了報告書
2.5.1 研修参加者
研修参加者は以下に示すとおりである。
１
２
３
４
表 20 研修参加者リスト
氏名
所属（2013 年 2 月現在）
Ms. Ana Repac
エネルギー・開発・環境保護省
気候変動課
Mr. Predrag Milanovic
エネルギー・開発・環境保護省
再生可能エネルギー局
Mr. Aleksandar Pavlovic
交通省検査局道路交通検査係
Mr. Dimitrije Lilic
エネルギー・開発・環境保護省
建築物省エネルギー担当
2.5.2 研修日程
研修日程及び研修目的、到達目標は以下に示すとおりである。研修で用いた資料を添付資
料 12 に示す。（ただし著作物利用許諾を得たものに限定）
表 21 研修日程表
日
1
月日
10/29
時間
月
場所
－
9:30-12:00
13:00-14:00
2
10/30
火
JICA 東京
午前
4
10/31
11/1
水
11/2
金
JICA ブリーフィング
－
オリエンテーション
－
移動
10:00-12:00
一般財団法人省エネ
ルギーセンター
JICA 東京
10:00-12:00
JICA における気候変動関連プロジェクトへの取
組を理解し、セルビア国における気候変動分野
における日本との二国間・多国間協力の検討等
に活かす。
－
資源エネル経済産業省資源エネ
ギー庁
ルギー庁
14:00-17:30
5
－
14:00-16:00
木
研修目的・到達目標
研修員入国
JICA 地球環境部気候
変動対策室
14:00-15:30
3
訪問先等
国土交通省
パナソニック
パナソニック株式会社
センター東京
14:00-16:00 ソニーシティソニー株式会社
2-53
日本の再生可能エネルギー・省エネルギー政
策等を理解し、セルビア国における NAMA 策定
等に活かす。
省エネルギー分野における日本の政策、技術
等を理解し、セルビア国事業者向けに適用の可
能性について検討する。
日本の交通部門における GHG 削減対策、都市
計画部門における低炭素都市づくり支援、建築
部門における建物省エネ実現に向けた政策取
組等について意見交換を行い、セルビア国に
おける NAMA 策定等に活かす。
住宅、都市部門における民間の先進的な省エ
ネルギー技術を理解し、セルビア国事業者向け
に適用の可能性について検討する。
オフィスビル部門における民間の先進的な省エ
セルビア国国としての適切な緩和行動(NAMA)能力開発プロジェクト
日
月日
時間
場所
訪問先等
大崎
プロジェクト業務完了報告書
研修目的・到達目標
ネルギー技術を理解し、セルビア国事業者向け
に適用の可能性について検討する。
6
11/3
土
-
報告資料作成
-
７
11/4
日
-
報告資料作成
-
9:30-12:00
8
11/5
月
横浜市
みなとみらい
みなとみらい 21 熱供
21 熱供給株
給株式会社センター
式会社
プラント
午後
9:30-13:00
9
11/6
火
東芝
府中工場
午後
10:00-12:00
10
11/7
環境省
報告資料作成
-
株式会社東芝
スマートコミュニティ/スマートシティ技術、工場
省エネ等に関する施設見学及び意見交換を行
い、セルビア国事業者向けに適用の可能性に
ついて検討する。
報告資料作成
-
環境省
日本の政府、産業界による地球温暖化対策、
再生可能エネルギー利活用推進策に関する意
見交換を行い、セルビア国における NAMA 策
定等に活かす。また、二国間オフセット・クレジッ
ト・メカニズムに関する意見交換を行い、セルビ
ア国における事業への活用について検討する。
電源開発株式会社
日本の高効率石炭火力発電技術に関する施設
見学を行い、セルビア国における事業への活用
について検討する。
水
14:00-16:00
11
11/8
木
12
11/9
金
10:00-17:00
10:00-12:00
電源開発株
式会社
磯子石炭火
力発電所
東日本高速
道路株式会
社本社及び
岩槻道路管
制センター
自治体における低炭素社会づくりに関する具体
的な取組について意見交換を行い、セルビア
国における NAMA 策定等に活かす。あわせて、
都市における地域冷暖房施設見学を通じて技
術を理解するとともに、セルビア国における事業
に活かす。
東日本高速道路株式
会社
日本の道路交通分野における民間の温暖化対
策や環境対策に関する意見交換や施設見学を
行い、セルビア国における NAMA 策定等に活
かす。
JICA 報告・評価会
午後
13
11/10
土
午前
研修員出国
－
2.5.3 研修内容（講義・討論・見学）
講義の内容及び質疑・討論の内容は以下に示すとおりである。
1)
JICA における気候変動関連プロジェクトへの取組（10/30 午後）
気候変動分野における JICA の途上国向け支援の概要及び個別取組の内容について、講師か
ら説明を受けた。具体的には、日本の ODA の枠組みメカニズム及び関連支援ツールの概要、
2-54
セルビア国国としての適切な緩和行動(NAMA)能力開発プロジェクト
プロジェクト業務完了報告書
円借款、無償資金援助、技術協力、及び地球規模課題対応国際科学技術協力を通じた取組に
関する具体的な事業紹介等がなされた。
2)
日本の再生可能エネルギー・省エネルギー政策（10/31 午後）
グリーンエネルギー促進に向けた経済産業省資源エネルギー庁の政策について、講師から
説明を受けた。具体的には、省エネルギー法の背景、構成及び同法に基づく諸施策、再生可
能エネルギー促進に向けた固定価格買取制度（FIT）、建築物・都市・地域における次世代
のエネルギー管理取組であるスマートコミュニティ推進に関する説明がなされた。その後の
質疑応答・意見交換において、セルビアにおける FIT 制度の状況、課題及び日本の制度との
違い、またバイオマス活用における需要と供給をどう結びつけるか、等について、講師と研
修員の間で意見交換を行った。FIT 制度については、電力会社による再生可能エネルギーの
買取が、一般電気料金の値上げに繋がるという問題があり、制度の運用方法に留意が必要な
点で、非常に有効な議論が交わされた。
3)
省エネルギー分野における日本の政策、技術（11/1 午前）
省エネルギー法、及び法律下で行われている諸制度（エネルギー管理士制度、トップランナ
ー制度、ラベリング制度等）、推進施策、産業界及び民間の自主的取組の概要とともに、法
律に基づく情報提供、普及、トレーニング等を行う省エネルギーセンターの産業部門、民生・
商業・運輸部門向け取組について具体的な取組メニューが紹介された。研修員からは、セル
ビアにおける各種省エネ制度状況紹介の他、省エネの取組みを進める上での課題（組織、人
的リソース、予算）等について、講師への質問、意見交換がなされた。
4)
交通部門における日本の GHG 削減、低炭素都市づくり支援、建物省エネルギー化実現に向
けた政策（11/1 午後）
交通・都市・住宅の 3 分野における GHG 削減ないし低炭素社会構築に向けた国土交通省の
施策、法制、及び支援取組について、政策取組の背景とともに、講師から説明を受けた。交
通部門については、交通部門をめぐる CO2 排出量の傾向に加え、同省の「中期的地球温暖
化対策中間とりまとめ」に基づく環境対応車の開発・普及促進、交通流対策等、具体的な取
組メニューが紹介された。都市部門については、低炭素都市づくりのための推進法制及び地
方自治体向けガイドラインの内容について説明を受けた。住宅部門については、「省エネル
ギーに関する法律」における住宅建築物向け規制、建築物の環境総合性能評価システム、建
物の省エネ化推進に向けた諸取組の具体的な内容について説明を受けた。研修員からは、国
交省の予算と、特定施策（エコカー減税等）の予算分配方法について質問がなされた。また
建物省エネルギー化の取組など、セルビアで実施中の制度紹介や日本の制度との違いや課題
について、意見交換がなされた。
2-55
セルビア国国としての適切な緩和行動(NAMA)能力開発プロジェクト
5)
プロジェクト業務完了報告書
自治体における低炭素社会づくりに関する具体的な取組（横浜市）
（11/5 午前）
横浜市の低炭素社会づくりに関する戦略、ビジョンの概要、横浜市と政府、民間が連携、推
進する横浜スマートシティプロジェクト（YSCP）や横浜グリーンパワー（YGP）モデル事
業、持続可能なモビリティ社会実現を目指す Yokohama Mobility “Project ZERO”のコンセプト
概要及び事業計画について、講師から説明を受けた。研修員からは、国の政策に対する自治
体の参加方法（予算分配を含む）や市の取組に対し民間事業者の参加をどのように促すか、
等について質問が出された。またセルビア国内においても地方自治体レベルに取組を広げて
いくことが大きな課題であり、横浜市の取組が非常に参考になる、とのコメントがあった。
6)
日本の温暖化対策、再生可能エネルギー政策、2013 年以降に日本が推進する二国間協力枠
組みの提案に向けた取組（11/7 午前）
①日本の温暖化対策法制及び法律に基づく環境省の取組及び各部門の取組、②産業部門にお
ける温暖化対策に向けた自主行動計画の進捗成果及びその評価検証結果、③再生エネルギー
利活用推進に向けた固定価格買取制度や洋上風力発電に関する実証事業等環境省の取組、さ
らには、④2013 年以降に日本が推進する二国間協力枠組みである二国間オフセット・クレジ
ット・メカニズム（BOCM）の概要及び最近の取組動向の 4 点について、講師から説明を受
けた。研修員からは、日本の民間企業による自主行動計画について、各企業が削減目標を達
成する際の動機や政府からの働きかけの有無、及び日本における再生可能エネルギー利活用
の進捗状況及び取組の詳細に関する質問が出されたほか、交通部門における排出削減取組の
詳細や、セルビア国プロジェクトへの適用を意識した、BOCM によるセルビア国向けファイ
ナンスの可否や BOCM におけるプロジェクト実施スケジュールに関する質問も出された。
7)
パナソニック株式会社
パナソニックセンター東京（11/2 午前）
パナソニック株式会社（本社大阪府門真市）のパナソニックセンター東京を見学し、スマ
ートシティ、エネルギー管理システム等最新の省エネルギー技術に関するショールーム、及
びゼロ CO2 排出型住宅に関するコンセプト展示施設を見学した。見学後、同社と研修員の
間で、同社がセルビアへ新規開設した拠点の紹介を含めた意見交換が行われた。見学を通じ
て、研修員はエネルギーを最適化して個別建築物、地域、都市の各レベルにおいて利用する
技術を体系的に学ぶとともに、同社側との活発な意見交換を通じて、自国の気候、住宅等の
実情に合わせた低 CO2、省エネルギー型の建築物、都市づくりのノウハウについて習得、理
解できたと思われる。研修員は熱心に見学時の説明に耳を傾け、案内員等へ質問を行ってい
た。
8)
ソニー株式会社
ソニーシティ大崎（11/2 午後）
ソニー株式会社（本社東京都港区）のソニーシティ大崎社屋を見学し、ヒートアイランド
2-56
セルビア国国としての適切な緩和行動(NAMA)能力開発プロジェクト
プロジェクト業務完了報告書
現象対策としてビル東側側面壁全体に設けられた気化熱を利用したバイオスキン設備、下水
道を利用した熱源制御（冷却、放熱）システム、加えて、同社の環境配慮施策の一つである
屋上・周縁部の緑化エリアを見学した。見学に先立ち、同社グループの環境目標と本社社屋
ソニーシティ及びソニーシティ大崎における環境配慮の取組について、講師より説明を受け
た。研修生は、熱心に見学時の説明に耳を傾け、積極的に質問をしていた。
9)
みなとみらい 21 熱供給株式会社
センタープラント（11/5 午前）
みなとみらい 21 熱供給株式会社（神奈川県横浜市）のセンタープラントにおいて、日本の
地域冷暖房の特徴、燃料を含む同社熱供給施設の概要、適用されている貯熱技術、熱供給範
囲とその特徴等について説明を受けた。また同社地域冷暖房供給設備を構成するボイラー室、
冷却棟、ターボ冷凍機等の施設を見学した。研修生からは、施設に関する質問の他、セルビ
アの地域暖房との違い、特に課金体系や料金設定方法、地域冷暖房会社の運営方法や、再生
可能エネルギーの導入予定、施設更新計画等について、質問・意見が多く出された。
10) 株式会社東芝
府中工場（11/6 午前）
東芝株式会社（本社東京都新宿区）の府中工場を見学し、スマートコミュニティを構成す
るエネルギー管理システム技術の一部であるデータモニタリング機器、メーター設備や、太
陽光発電を支える高効率発電パネル・蓄電池技術に関する展示施設を見学した。見学に先立
ち、同社が取り組むスマートコミュニティ/スマートシティ技術の概要、技術開発等に係る
国際提携等取組について、講師より説明を受けた。再生可能エネルギーの利用に際しては、
エネルギーを安定供給する仕組みが必要であり、同社のエネルギー管理の技術に関する説明
に対し、研修員は熱心に耳を傾けていた。また、同国社会は未だスマートコミュニティ/ス
マートシティ技術導入の段階に達していないが、研修生は技術の有効性を理解し、強い関心
を示していた。
11) 電源開発株式会社
磯子火力発電所（11/7 午後）
電源開発株式会社（東京都中央区）の磯子火力発電所を見学し、高効率石炭火力発電を構成
するボイラーの施設及び制御室、脱硫装置施設、騒音防止等周辺環境への配慮がなされた石
炭搬入施設、所在地自治体との環境協定に基づき近接地域の景観に配慮した設計がなされた
ボイラー棟煙突部を見学可能な屋上部分を見学した。見学に先立ち、同発電所が関東地域の
エネルギー供給において占める役割や、同社が海外において進める高効率発電技術に係る協
力事業について、講師より説明を受けた。セルビアでは国内で産出されるリグナイトを利用
した石炭火力発電が主流であり、その高効率化が課題となっているため、日本の高効率石炭
火力発電技術に対し、研修員は高い関心を示していた。
2-57
セルビア国国としての適切な緩和行動(NAMA)能力開発プロジェクト
12) 東日本高速道路株式会社
岩槻管制センター
プロジェクト業務完了報告書
（11/8 午前・午後）
東日本高速道路株式会社（東京都千代田区）の岩槻管制センターを見学し、日本の民間道路
交通部門における温暖化対策取組の一端を担う、交通管制システムの設備、装置を見学した。
見学を通じ、渋滞情報や事故情報を管制センターに集約し、リアルタイムで利用者に提供す
ることにより、新たな渋滞の発生緩和に努めていること、また高速道路の管理手法について、
説明を受けた。また同社が温暖化防止対策として導入している、自然エネルギーを利用した
道路付帯設備や、道路利用者に対する情報提供システムを、高速道路休憩施設において見学
した。こうした見学に先立ち、同社本社において、日本の道路交通部門における高速道路の
整備を通じた CO2 の排出削減・吸収取組や、循環型社会形成に向けた諸取組、環境負荷低
減等に向けた取組の概要について、講師より説明を受けた。
2.5.4 成果の活用方法について
報告会では、研修で得られた成果とあわせて、得られた内容を今後セルビア国でどのように
活用するか、研修員が個別に意見を述べた。報告会で研修員が使用したプレゼンテーション
資料を添付資料 12 に示す。また、以下に研修員からの意見の概要を示す。
・日本がこれまで取り組んできたことや、これから取り組もうとしていることについて、
担当者から直接話を聞けたことは貴重な経験であった。日本で導入されている気候変動
計画や施策をセルビアにそのまま適用することは難しいと思うが、本研修で得た知見は、
今後、国が向かうべき方向、気候変動対策の評価を行うのに大いに活用できる。セルビ
アにおいては、国レベルとともに、地方都市レベルにおいても気候変動対策を進めてい
く必要がある。今回学んだ知見は非常に役に立つと考えている。
・セルビアにおいても、日本と同じく再生可能エネルギーの活用が更に重要になると考え
ている。その推進策として、既に再生可能エネルギー固定価格買取制度はあるが、今回
学んだ日本の事例は、セルビアにおける施策推進において大変参考になると感じた。ま
た再生可能エネルギー利用においては安定供給が課題であるが、今回訪問した民間企業
において、先進的な技術を学ぶことができた。また、日本などから気候変動対策技術を
輸入する場合、プロジェクトのコストを含めてプロジェクトの経済性評価を厳密に行う
必要性について認識することができた。
・エネルギー効率改善、再生可能エネルギーの活用、省エネルギー対策推進は、総合的な
アプローチが重要（一体的に進めるべき）と考えている。本研修を通じて、セルビアに
おいて気候変動緩和策を実施、促進するキャパシティが強化されたと考える。また、
NAMA プロジェクトの MRV システムの構築に必要な知見を深めることができた。
・交通セクターの GHG 削減策や MRV について知見を深めることができた。国内の関連
2-58
セルビア国国としての適切な緩和行動(NAMA)能力開発プロジェクト
プロジェクト業務完了報告書
機関に MRV 策定の重要性を今後説明していきたい。講義・見学を通じて、最適な車を
作る・使うほか、交通分野の様々な効率改善・省エネの取組みを学ぶことができた。今
回学んだことを踏まえ、セルビアで導入可能な施策（少ない投資で効果が得られる施策）
の実施に取り組んで行きたい。セルビアにおいても、交通分野において環境法規制の整
備が進められているが、“推奨”では効果がないため、”義務化“を進める必要がある
と考えている。
2-59
セルビア国国としての適切な緩和行動(NAMA)能力開発プロジェクト
第3章
プロジェクト業務完了報告書
プロジェクト実施運営上の課題・工夫・教訓
①
「セ」国全体の NAMA に関する認知度を向上する啓発活動の重要性
NAMA は非常に新しいコンセプトであり、COP における国際交渉などに直接関わっている
関係者を除くと、「セ」国ではほとんど認知されていなかった。CDM が発効した当初も、
多くの途上国は国内での啓発活動が進まず、また啓発を行う能力がなかったうえ、体制整備
など国内での取り組みが遅れたため、結果として CDM の恩恵に与ることができなかった国
が多く見られた。
本プロジェクトでは、国内で NAMA に関するセミナーを実施するなどして、NAMA に関す
る情報を NAMA 実施者以外にも広く周知し共有するとともに、NAMA 実施者および NAMA
を管轄する政府関係者に対してワーキンググループ等を通じて技術移転を行うことで、
「セ」国全体の NAMA に関する認知度の向上に努めた。
多くの途上国では、「セ」国と同様に NAMA に関する認知度が低いことが想定され、本プ
ロジェクトで実施した技術移転活動、啓発活動は、他の国で NAMA 開発に関する技術協力
プロジェクトを実施する際に活用できると考えられる。
②
フォーカルポイントと NAMA 実施機関両方への技術移転の実施と NAMA 実施機関の
モチベーション及びプロジェクト実施インセンティブの維持
NAMA を実現するためには、NAMA の国内承認やプロモーションを担当することになる
NAMA のフォーカルポイント機関に対する技術移転に加え、実際に NAMA を実施する政府
省庁、関係機関などに対しても技術移転を行い、NAMA と MRV に関する理解を深め、NAMA
開発のポイントや NAMA のメリットについて知ってもらうことが必須である。
本プロジェクトでは、省エネルギーに関する活動を「セ」国内で管轄する（旧）インフラエ
ネルギー省と（旧）セルビア省エネルギー庁、さらに国内で最大の発電事業者であるセルビ
ア電力公社にワーキンググループに参加してもらい、C/P 以外への技術移転も積極的に行っ
た。他の国で同様の活動をする場合でも、フォーカルポイントへの技術移転と NAMA 実施
機関・管轄省庁へのキャパシティディベロップメントはセットで実施されるべきである。
技術移転を通じた本プロジェクトの成果が継続して発現するために、NAMA 実施機関がそ
れぞれのプロジェクトを推進するためのモチベーションが維持され、プロジェクト実施イン
センティブが働くことが最も重要である。そのために、ワーキンググループ会議及び個別協
議を通して C/P や NAMA 実施機関への継続的な NAMA に関する最新情報の提供や、COP17
のサイドイベントやバルカン地域 NAMA セミナーを通して国際社会、日本政府、他ドナー・
国際機関への NAMA プロジェクトの投融資ニーズの発信を行った。
3-1
セルビア国国としての適切な緩和行動(NAMA)能力開発プロジェクト
③
プロジェクト業務完了報告書
NAMA 投融資促進のためのプロモーション素材の作成及び国際社会への発信
「セ」国で NAMA 事業実施者となる、省庁、自治体、公社等に対して技術移転をすること
で、今後彼ら自身で新たな NAMA を計画、提案できるようになると期待される一方、単な
る計画だけで終わらせないために、NAMA に投融資をする可能性のある投資家を主なター
ゲットとするプロモーション素材の作成と発信が不可欠である。本プロジェクトでは、開示
可能な財務情報などを記した素材を作成し、外部イベントでも積極的にプロジェクトの進捗
に応じ情報発信を行った。3 年次に作成したショートディスクリプションでも、より詳細な
投資家向けの情報を可能な限り含めた。これらのプロモーション素材を活用し、に COP17
におけるサイドイベントやセルビアで行ったバルカン地域 NAMA セミナーを開催し、本プ
ロジェクトの成果の国際社会、ドナー・国際機関、周辺国への情報発信を行った。
④
本プロジェクトの成果の周辺地域の波及と気候変動関係者間の情報共有プラットフォ
ーム形成支援の必要性
上記のプロモーション素材を用い、2013 年 2 月に周辺国へ本プロジェクト成果の発信、周
辺国の気候変動対策の現状と課題の情報共有及び関係者間の意見交換を行うことを目的と
して、バルカン地域 NAMA セミナーを開催し、本プロジェクトの成果がバルカン半島にあ
る非付属書 I 国へ波及するよう努めた。これらの取り組みから、バルカン地域全体に対して
本プロジェクトの成果が継続的・面的に波及・発現するためには、単発のセミナー実施にと
どまらず、「セ」国及び周辺国情報交換のためのプラットフォーム形成に対する継続的なフ
ォローアップ支援が有効であると考えられる。
⑤
NAMA と MRV に関する国際交渉の決定の迅速な取り込み
NAMA と MRV に関する国際交渉は日々変化しており、最新の決定を本プロジェクトの活動
および成果品に迅速に取り込むように努めた。具体的には、COP における NAMA、隔年報
告書（BUR）等に関する決定について、今後「セ」国がこれらの文書に含める必要がある
と思われる事項については、プロモーション素材やショートリスト、ショートディスクリプ
ションに積極的に取り込むことで、今後「セ」国がこれらの文書を作成する際の情報収集や
分析に関わる作業を効率的に行うことができるように努めた。
⑥
C/P の技術協力プロジェクトへの理解
本プロジェクトの実施当初は、C/P から本技術協力プロジェクトの実施方針に対してあまり
理解が得られず、本来 C/P をはじめ、「セ」国側で実施するべき、キャパシティディベロッ
プメント活動について、専門家チームに対して実施するよう指示をするという場面が多々あ
った。これに対し、技術協力の基本的な方針を専門家から再度説明するとともに、C/P だけ
でなく、「セ」国全体にとっても長期的なベネフィットが多い点を説明することで、徐々に
技術的な活動に自ら参加するようになった。この背景には、「セ」国ではドナー支援に参加
するコンサルタントを、自らのインハウスコンサルタントとして一般的に活用しているとい
う背景を受けたものであり、このような状況にある国においては、プロジェクト実施前に相
手国側に明確に実施方針を説明し、理解を得ることが重要である。
3-2
セルビア国国としての適切な緩和行動(NAMA)能力開発プロジェクト
第4章
プロジェクト業務完了報告書
プロジェクト目標の達成度（終了時評価結果の概要）
本技術協力プロジェクトのプロジェクト目標の達成度、上位目標の達成への道筋及び各成
果の達成状況に関する考察を以下に示す（詳細については、別途 JICA 調査団による終了時
評価調査報告書を参照されたい）。
4.1
プロジェクト目標
プロジェクト目標
「セ」国政府における NAMA を計画して実施を促進する能力が開発される
達成指標
a) エネルギー・開発・環境保護省（旧環境・鉱業・国土計画省）の気候変動課職員 3 人以
上が、NAMA の計画プロセスを十分理解する
b) ワーキンググループに参加するすべての機関について、１人以上が NAMA の計画プロ
セスを十分理解する
c)
NAMA とその実施に必要な情報を含む文書が作成される
上記の達成指標を参照し、本技術協力プロジェクトの目標達成結果について以下に述べる。
プロジェクト目標の達成度は、本プロジェクト実施の結果、NAMA を形成し促進するため
の人材育成ならびに体制強化が実施できたため、非常に高いと考える。その理由は、以下の
とおりである。
-
C/P である MEDEP の気候変動課は、本プロジェクトを通して、気候変動対策の実施主
体であるセルビア電力公社（EPS）や MEDEP の省エネルギー担当部局（旧セルビア省
エネルギー庁 SEEA）、再生可能エネルギー担当部局（旧インフラエネルギー省 MIE）、
交通省、建設都市計画省、セルビア道路公社と連携関係を構築することができ、今後、
「セ」国で NAMA の実施を主導・促進するフォーカルポイントとして、本プロジェクト
を通じ構築した連携関係を活用して、上記の気候変動実施主体へ NAMA の国際的な議論
等の最新情報を共有できるようになった。あわせて、気候変動対策の実施主体からの
NAMA 実施に対する疑問や問題点に関する相談を受け付け、対応する体制が確立され
た。
-
気候変動対策の実施主体である MEDEP の省エネルギー担当部局、再生可能エネルギー
担当部局、交通省、建設・都市計画省、EPS やセルビア道路公社から、各省庁や公社で
4-1
セルビア国国としての適切な緩和行動(NAMA)能力開発プロジェクト
プロジェクト業務完了報告書
今後気候変動対策を担ってゆく人材が本プロジェクトに参加しており、各省庁や公社が
主管する分野で NAMA を発掘し、NAMA プロジェクトの実施促進のための文書（NAMA
ショートディスクリプション）を作成する経験をつむことができた。作成した文書は、
雛形として各省庁や公社において、ロングリストにある他の類似案件や将来の新規案件
を NAMA として形成する際に活用されることが期待される。本プロジェクトに参加した
人材は、各省庁や公社において、今後中心的な立場で気候変動対策を実施、促進してい
くことが期待される。
PDM に示される、3 つのプロジェクト目標の達成指標についても、以下のとおり達成された
と考えられる。
達成指標： a) 環境・鉱業・国土計画省の気候変動課職員 3 人以上が、NAMA の計画プロセ
スを十分理解する
NAMA 計画プロセスとして、以下の 1～5 の活動を気候変動課が専門家チームの支援を受け
て行った。
1. NAMA ロングリストの作成、精査
（NAMA 実施機関から提出されるポテンシャル NAMA
の取り纏めと分析）
2. NAMA のショートリスト化のクライテリアの策定とスクリーニングの実施
3. ショートディスクリプション作成支援、NAMA 登録簿提出書類の作成および作成支援
4. NAMA 開発ガイドラインの作成
5. 財務ワークショップへの参加と演習の実施
MEDEP の気候変動課の職員 3 名（Ms. Danijela Bozanic、Ms. Ana Repac、Mr. Dragisa Nikolic）
は上記の全ての段階に関する活動に参加し、計画プロセス全体を理解したものと考えられ
る。また、同課の残り 2 名（Ms. Dragana Radulovic、Ms. Sandra Lazic）は上記 NAMA 計画プ
ロセスの最初の 2 段階に関する活動に主に参加した。気候変動課内で今後情報共有が図られ、
この 2 名についてもさらに全体プロセスの理解が深まることが期待される。
達成指標： b) ワーキンググループに参加するすべての機関について、１人以上が NAMA の
計画プロセスを十分理解する
NAMA 計画プロセスとして、以下の 1～4 の活動をワーキンググループ参加者が、気候変動
課および専門家チームの支援を受けて行った。ワーキンググループ参加機関は MEDEP（旧
インフラエネルギー省：MIE 及び旧セルビア省エネルギー庁：SEEA）、建設都市計画省、
EPS、セルビア道路公社である。
4-2
セルビア国国としての適切な緩和行動(NAMA)能力開発プロジェクト
プロジェクト業務完了報告書
1. NAMA ロングリストの作成（NAMA になる可能性のある緩和行動の策定、発掘）
2. ショートディスクリプション作成
3. NAMA 登録簿提出書類の作成
4. 財務ワークショップへの参加と演習の実施
以上の活動について、全 8 回の全体ワーキンググループ会議および多くの個別協議を通じて、
各機関の 1 名以上が NAMA 計画プロセスを適切に理解したと考えられる。
また、NAMA 開発プロセスで特に重要と考えられる、NAMA 文書（ショートディスクリプ
ション）の作成においては、専門家チームと気候変動課が作成するのではなく、NAMA 実
施機関となる各機関に自ら作成してもらい、技術支援を受けながら最終化することで、理解
が更に深まったと考えられる。
達成指標： c) NAMA とその実施に必要な情報を含む文書が作成される
全 8 回の全体ワーキンググループ会議および関連機関との個別協議等を通じて、ロングリス
トに含まれる 69 件のポテンシャル NAMA より、NAMA を選定し、6 件の NAMA ショート
ディスクリプションが作成された。これらのショートディスクリプション作成では、対象と
する 3 つのサブセクター（エネルギー、交通、建物）全てをカバーしており、汎用性の高い
文書が作成された。
このショートディスクリプション以外にも、プロモーション文書として、NAMA ロングリ
スト、ショートリストおよび NAMA ポートフォリオ（16 件のショートリスト化された NAMA
について、A4 枚に概要を取り纏めたもの）が作成された他、気候変動課および NAMA 実施
機関が作成したプレゼンテーション資料も整備された。加えて、国連の NAMA 登録簿（プ
ロトタイプ）に提出するための定型フォーマットも作成された。
以上のことから、本技術協力プロジェクトによって MEDEP の気候変動課の適切な緩和行動
に関する能力の向上は達成されたと評価でき、さらに、今後の能力向上及び組織の発展が期
待される。
4-3
セルビア国国としての適切な緩和行動(NAMA)能力開発プロジェクト
4.2
プロジェクト業務完了報告書
上位目標達成への道筋
上位目標：セルビア国政府が自国の気候変動緩和策を明確に提示できるようになる。
達成指標：
1．NAMA が完成する
2．NAMA が UNFCCC 事務局へ提出される
上記の達成指標を参照し、本技術協力プロジェクトによる上位目標達成の道筋について以
下に述べる。
本プロジェクトで作成した NAMA ショートリストを元に国連 NAMA 登録簿への登録申請書
類が作成された。セルビア国政府による国連 NAMA 登録簿への登録申請及び本プロジェク
トで作成した NAMA ショートディスクリプションの提出が、近々に実施される予定である。
今後、本プロジェクトを通じて構築された C/P と NAMA 実施機関との連携体制を元に省エ
ネルギー分野の NAMA ロングリストから実施可能性のある NAMA の開発の推進や、省エネ
ルギー分野以外の分野についても、本プロジェクトで得られた知見を生かし、C/P 及び「セ」
国内の各関係機関との協働による NAMA の開発が期待される。
こうした活動を通じて、開発された NAMA をセルビア政府が UNFCCC 事務局へ正式に提出
することで、上位目標である「NAMA が完成する」ならびに「セルビア国政府が自国の気
候変動緩和策を明確に提示できるようになる」が達成されるものと考えられる。
本プロジェクトにおいて、上位目標達成への道筋をつけることができたことは、大きな成果
と考えられる。
4-4
セルビア国国としての適切な緩和行動(NAMA)能力開発プロジェクト
4.3
プロジェクト業務完了報告書
各成果の達成状況
4.3.1 成果 1
成果１：NAMA と MRV（測定・報告・検証）に関する理解が深まる
達成指標
1．途上国が提出した NAMA を分類した表が適切に作成される。
2．ワークショップ参加者の 70％以上が、上記の NAMA 分類表および MRV に関する基本
的なコンセプトを理解する
上記の達成指標を参照し、成果 1 の達成結果について以下に述べる。
本プロジェクト実施した成果１に関わる活動、特にワーキンググループ会議や個別協議にお
けるディスカッションを通じて、C/P および NAMA 関係機関は、NAMA および MRV のコン
セプトだけでなく、他の途上国が提出した NAMA の概要についても知見を深めることがで
きた。2012 年 2 月および 2013 年 2 月に国内で実施した NAMA セミナーの時に配布した質問
表への回答からも、参加者の 70％以上が NAMA、MRV に関する知識が向上していると判断
され、NAMA、MRV に関する基本的な理解は十分達成されたと考える。
4.3.2 成果 2
成果２：MRV 可能な NAMA のショートリスト作成能力が開発される
達成指標
1．パイロットセクター・サブセクターについて NAMA のショートリストが作成される。
2．MRV に関する能力開発ニーズが特定される。
上記の達成指標を参照し、成果 2 の達成結果について以下に述べる。
4-5
セルビア国国としての適切な緩和行動(NAMA)能力開発プロジェクト
プロジェクト業務完了報告書
本プロジェクトの活動を通じ、C/P においては、NAMA 実施機関から今後提案される NAMA
について、セルビアにとって適切な緩和行動であるかどうかを、セルビア国の気候変動政策
との整合性、MRV 実施可能性、持続可能性、GHG 排出削減量計算の妥当性等の観点から分
析し、ショートリスト化するためのキャパシティが強化された。
また、ワーキンググループに参加した NAMA 関係機関については、各担当分野において、
NAMA になりうる緩和行動の発掘、分析、選定を行うためのキャパシティが強化された。
以上より、C/P の MRV 可能な NAMA のショートリスト作成能力が開発されたと考えられる。
あわせて、NAMA 関係機関についても、NAMA 開発に必要な能力が開発され、NAMA 開発
の推進に大きく寄与することが見込まれる。
4.3.3 成果 3
成果３：NAMA の実施を促進するための文書を作成する能力が開発される
達成指標
1．選ばれた NAMA について短い解説が作成される
2．NAMA をショートリスト化するための手順および NAMA のショートディスクリプショ
ン作成の手順が文書化される。
上記の達成指標を参照し、成果 3 の達成結果について以下に述べる。
本プロジェクトの活動を通じて、６件のショートディスクリプションを NAMA 実施機関が
自ら作成し、NAMA 文書の作成能力の向上、NAMA および MRV に関する知識の向上、GHG
排出削減量計算の手法ならびに財務分析手法等に関する知見を深めることができた。また、
C/P は NAMA 実施機関と連携し、適切な助言、指導を提供できる能力が強化された。加えて、
成果 2 のショートリスト化に係る手順及び上記のショートディスクリプション作成に係る手
順を含む、NAMA 開発ガイドラインが作成された。このガイドラインを活用し、更なる成
果の波及が期待される。
4-6
セルビア国国としての適切な緩和行動(NAMA)能力開発プロジェクト
プロジェクト業務完了報告書
4.3.4 成果 4
成果４：NAMA の認知度を向上する能力が強化される
達成指標
1．十分な情報を掲載したウェブサイトが開設・維持される
2．NAMA の紹介資料が 3 つ以上作成される
3．ショートリスト化された NAMA が 2 回以上の関係者に発表される
上記の達成指標を参照し、成果 4 の達成結果について以下に述べる。
本プロジェクトの活動を通じて、NAMA・MRV に関するウェブコンテンツの作成を C/P が
主体的に行った他、NAMA のプロモーション文書として、NAMA ポートフォリオ、NAMA
ショートディスクリプション、NAMA ロングリスト、NAMA 開発ガイドラインが作成され
た。また、国内 NAMA セミナーに加えて、COP サイドイベントやバルカン地域 NAMA セミ
ナーでもショートリスト化された NAMA を発信した。
以上より、NAMA の認知度を向上する能力が十分強化されたと考えられる。
4-7
セルビア国国としての適切な緩和行動(NAMA)能力開発プロジェクト
第5章
プロジェクト業務完了報告書
総括及び提言
本プロジェクト事業全体の総括及び提言は、下記のとおりである。
1.
気候変動課及び NAMA 実施機関をあわせた NAMA 開発能力の強化
C/P である MEDEP の気候変動課は、本プロジェクトを通して、NAMA の計画プロセスを十
分理解することができ、セルビア国における NAMA のフォーカルポイントとして、NAMA
実施機関から提案される NAMA について、セルビアにとって適切な緩和行動であるかどう
かを、セルビア国の気候変動政策との整合性、MRV 実施可能性、持続可能性、温室効果ガ
ス（GHG）排出削減量計算の妥当性等の観点からチェックし、NAMA 実施機関に適切に指
導することができるようになり、NAMA 開発を促進させるための能力が強化された。特に、
NAMA 開発プロセスで重要と考えられる NAMA 文書（ショートディスクリプション）にお
いて、気候変動課自身が、UNFCCC での NAMA に関する最新の議論や情報をタイムリーに
収集、分析して、NAMA 文書に必要な内容を更新し、NAMA 実施機関に適切にフィードバ
ックできる能力が強化された。
NAMA 実施機関は、各機関において今後中心的な立場で気候変動対策を実施する人材が特
定され、それらの人材が、本プロジェクトを通して、JICA 専門家チームの技術支援を受け
ながら、自らの所管するプロジェクトにおいて、プロジェクト概要、適用技術、MRV 実施
方法、GHG 排出削減量計算を記載した NAMA 文書（ショートディスクリプション）を作成
したことによって、各機関に NAMA を推進できる人材が育成され、実際に NAMA を開発で
きる実戦的な能力が強化された。
2.
NAMA 開発のための活動プラットフォームの形成
全 8 回の全体ワーキンググループ会議および NAMA 実施機関との個別協議等を通じて、C/P
である MEDEP の気候変動課は、気候変動対策の実施主体であるセルビア電力公社（EPS）
や MEDEP の省エネルギー担当部局、再生可能エネルギー担当部局、交通省、建設都市計画
省、セルビア道路公社と連携関係を構築することができ、今後、「セ」国で NAMA の実施
を主導・促進するフォーカルポイントとして、本プロジェクトを通じ構築した連携関係を活
用して、上記の気候変動実施主体へ NAMA の国際的な議論等の最新情報を共有できるよう
になった。あわせて、気候変動対策の実施主体からの NAMA 実施に対する疑問や問題点に
関する相談を受け付け、対応する体制が確立された。今後は、この活動プラットフォームを
ベースに、気候変動課と NAMA 実施機関が協働して NAMA 開発を推進していくことが期待
される。
5-1
セルビア国国としての適切な緩和行動(NAMA)能力開発プロジェクト
3.
プロジェクト業務完了報告書
汎用性の高い NAMA 関連文書の作成
本プロジェクトでロングリストに含まれる 69 件のポテンシャル NAMA を元に、対象とする
3 つのサブセクター（エネルギー、交通、建物）全てをカバーする形で 6 件の NAMA を選
定し、汎用性の高い NAMA ショートディスクリプションが作成された。
このショートディスクリプション以外にも、プロモーション文書として、NAMA ロングリ
ストおよび NAMA ポートフォリオ（16 件のショートリスト化された NAMA について、A4
枚に概要を取り纏めたもの）が作成された他、気候変動課および NAMA 実施機関が作成し
たプレゼンテーション資料も整備された。加えて、国連の NAMA 登録簿（プロトタイプ）
に提出するための定型フォーマットについても、ショートリスト化された 16 件について作
成された。これらの文書作成能力の過程、手法等を取りまとめたものとして、NAMA 開発
ガイドラインが作成された。今後は、これらの NAMA 関連文書を活用して、ロングリスト
に含まれているポテンシャル NAMA の開発、エネルギー、交通、建物以外のセクターや地
方自治体、民間企業での NAMA の開発が期待される。
「セ」国の NAMA 開発に関する情報発信と周辺国へのプロジェクト成果の共有
NAMA、MRV に関するウェブコンテンツの作成と情報発信、上記プロモーション素材を用いたセ
ルビア国内での NAMA セミナーの実施、国際会議である COP サイドイベントを開催し、「セ」国
の NAMA に関する情報発信を行った。あわせて、バルカン地域の気候変動関係者を招聘したバル
カン地域 NAMA セミナーを開催し、周辺国へ本プロジェクト成果の発信と、周辺国の気候変動対
策の現状と課題の情報共有を行った。
以上のように、気候変動課と NAMA 実施機関において人材と組織の NAMA 開発に関する能力が
強化され、気候変動課を中心に「セ」国の NAMA 開発に係る関係機関の活動促進の基盤が整備さ
れたのみならず、周辺のバルカン地域において NAMA 開発に係る知見や情報の共有基盤が築けた
という点で、非常に大きな成果を得ることができた。
5-2
ῧ௜㈨ᩱ
1.
PDM ࠾ࡼࡧ PO
2.
ᴗົࣇ࣮ࣟࢳ࣮ࣕࢺ
3.
ᑓ㛛ᐙάືᐇ⦼
4.
ྜྠㄪᩚጤဨ఍㆟஦㘓
5.
ྛᅜ NAMA ศ㢮࣐ࢺࣜࢵࢡࢫ
6.
NAMA ࣟࣥࢢࣜࢫࢺ࡜ศᯒ⤖ᯝ
7.
NAMA ࣏࣮ࢺࣇ࢛ࣜ࢜
8.
NAMA ࢩ࣮ࣙࢺࢹ࢕ࢫࢡࣜࣉࢩࣙࣥ
9.
NAMA ࢞࢖ࢻࣛ࢖ࣥ㸦ⱥㄒ㸧
10.
NAMA ࢞࢖ࢻࣛ࢖ࣥ㸦ࢭࣝࣅ࢔ㄒ㸧
11.
ࣂࣝ࢝ࣥᆅᇦ NAMA ࢭ࣑ࢼ࣮ཧຍ⪅ࣜࢫࢺ࠾ࡼࡧࢭ࣑ࢼ࣮㈨ᩱ
12.
ᮏ㑥◊ಟ㈨ᩱ
ῧ௜㈨ᩱ㸯 PDM ࠾ࡼࡧ PO
Project Design Matrix (Version 3.0)
3.
Capacity to produce documents 3.1 Short descriptions on selected NAMAs are developed.
Procedures for developing short descriptions are
to promote implementation of 3.2documented.
NAMAs is developed.
4. Capacity to promote recognition 4.1 Webpage containing sufficient information is established
of NAMAs is enhanced.
and maintained.
4.2 At least 3 promotion materials on NAMAs are developed.
4.3 Short-listed NAMAs are presented to relevant stakeholders
at least 2 times.
1. Joint evaluation by MEDEP and
Project experts
2. Promotion materials developed
3. Presentation materials
1. Short descriptions developed
2. Guideline developed
Project Title: Capacity Development Project on Nationally Appropriate Mitigation Actions (NAMAs) in the Republic of Serbia
Project Period: November 2010 – February 2013
Target Group: Ministry of Energy, Development and Environmental Protection (MEDEP), and organizations concerned in planning of NAMAs
Narrative Summary
Objectively Verifiable Indications
Means of Verification
Important Assumptions
1. Document with finalized
Overall Goal
Serbian Government becomes capable 1. NAMAs are finalized
NAMAs
of defining its contribution to climate 2. NAMAs are submitted to United Nations Framework 2. Communication to UNFCCC
change
Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) Secretariat
Secretariat
Project Purpose
- Serbian
Government
Capacity to formulate and promote 1. At least 3 people in Climate Change Division of MEDEP 1. Joint evaluation by MEDEP and
retains its positions
NAMAs is developed
sufficiently understand process of NAMAs planning
Project experts
regarding UNFCCC and
2. At least 1 person in each organization participating in
NAMAs
working groups sufficiently understands process of NAMAs 2. Joint evaluation by MEDEP and - Relevant organizations
planning.
Project experts
cooperate in formation
3. Document containing NAMAs and descriptions necessary
of NAMAs for sectors /
for their implementation is developed.
3. Strategic document for NAMAs
sub-sectors not covered
by project
Outputs
of counterparts
1. General
understanding
on 1.1 Matrix containing categorized NAMAs submitted by 1. Joint evaluation by MEDEP and - Majority
and
relevant
personnel
Project experts
NAMAs
and
measurement,
developing country parties is properly formulated.
remain in organizations
concerned with NAMAs
reporting and verification (MRV) 1.2 At least 70% of workshop participants understand content
2. Questionnaire conducted during
is enhanced.
of above matrix and general concept of MRV.
workshop
2. Capacity to shortlist NAMAs 2.1 Shortlist of NAMAs created for pilot sectors / sub-sectors. 1. Shortlist
which are measurable, reporting 2.2 Capacity developing needs on MRV are identified
2. Report on lessons learned
and verification is developed.
2.3 Procedures for short-listing NAMAs are documented.
Activities
1-1 Collect information on international discussions related to NAMAs and MRV. And share with
relevant organizations.
1-2 Collect NAMAs submitted by developing country parties to UNFCCC Secretariat and categorize
NAMAs by type (e.g., policy or project, national or local, unilateral or supported)
1-3 Consider methodologies and assumptions of MRV of NAMAs categorized above and develop matrix
1-4 Share matrix developed above with relevant organizations.
2-1 Select sectors / sub-sectors to plan NAMAs related to energy efficiency (e.g., building,
transportation, new energy and power production, etc.).
2-2 Establish working groups for NAMAs planning for pilot sector / sub-sector.
2-3 Review existing policies, strategies and strategies and plans related to climate change mitigation in
pilot sector / sub-sector.
2-4 Create long list of NAMAs for pilot sectors / sub-sectors.
2-5 Categorize long-listed NAMAs by type (e.g., policy/ project, national/ local, unilateral/ supported).
2-6 Consider methodologies and assumptions of MRV of long-listed NAMAs categorized above and
formulate matrix (Fill in matrix which is described in 1-3).
2-7 Present above-mentioned matrix at workshop and scrutinize long-listed NAMAs mainly considering
feasibility of associated MRV.
2-8 Create shortlist of NAMAs that are measurable, reportable and verifiable for pilot sectors /
sub-sectors.
2-9 Compile lessons learned including capacity development needs on implementation of MRV.
2-10 Produce a guideline for short-listing NAMAs.
3-1 Select NAMAs from shortlist to develop short description.
3-2 Develop draft short descriptions for selected NAMAs, including title, background, purpose,
summary, timeframe, responsible organizations, preliminary assessment of technical and economic
feasibility, contribution to GHG limitation and reduction, MRV, possible financing means (e.g.,
national / EU / international funds, public-private partnership (PPP) and Japanese yen loan) and
barriers.
3-3 Present above-mentioned draft short descriptions, obtain feedbacks and finalize
3-4 Produce a guideline for developing NAMA short description.
4-1 Establish webpage on Serbian NAMAs and MRV.
4-2 Develop promotion materials on project for presentations.
4-3 Present progress and outcome of project at international conference.
4-4 Present outcome of project to national stakeholders.
Inputs
Serbian side
Preconditions
1. Relevant
organizations
1. International 1. Personnel
experts
1) Counterparts and
cooperate in
formulation of
relevant personnel
NAMAs
2.
National 2) National experts
experts
(as required)
2. NAMAs continue to
Technical
be relevant under
experts
on 2. Project office and
UNFCCC
energy efficiency facilities necessary
and other fields
for
project
implementation
3. One (1) local
assistant
3. Others
Running cost of
4. Training in office
Japan
Three (3) persons
for 2 weeks
Japanese side
Plan of Operation (PO)
2010
2011
2012
2013
11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2
JCC
1
2
3
4
5
6
1. General understanding on NAMAs and measurement, reporting and verification (MRV) is enhanced.
Collect information on international
1-1 discussions related to NAMAs and MRV.
And share with relevant organizations.
Collect NAMAs submitted by developing
country parties to UNFCCC Secretariat
1-2 and categorize NAMAs by type (e.g.,
policy or project, national or local,
unilateral or supported)
Consider methodologies and assumptions
1-3 of MRV of NAMAs categorized above
1-4
and develop matrix
Share matrix developed above with
relevant organizations.
2. Capacity to shortlist NAMAs which are measurable, reportable and verifiable is developed.
Select sectors / sub-sectors to plan
NAMAs related to energy efficiency (e.g.,
2-1 building, transportation, new energy and
power production, etc.).
Establish working groups for NAMAs
2-2 planning for pilot sector / sub-sector.
Review existing policies, strategies and
strategies and plans related to climate
change mitigation in pilot sector / subsector.
Create long list of NAMAs for pilot
2-4 sectors / sub-sectors.
2-3
Categorize long-listed NAMAs by type
2-5 (e.g., policy/ project, national/ local,
unilateral/ supported).
Consider methodologies and assumptions
2-6 of MRV of long-listed NAMAs
categorized above and formulate matrix.
Present above-mentioned matrix at
workshop and scrutinize long-listed
2-7
NAMAs mainly considering feasibility of
associated MRV.
Create shortlist of NAMAs that are
2-8 measurable, reportable and verifiable for
pilot sectors / sub-sectors.
Compile lessons learned including
2-9 capacity development needs on
implementation of MRV.
Produce a guideline for short-listing
2-10 NAMAs.
2010
2011
2012
2013
11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2
3. Capacity to produce documents to promote implementation of NAMAs is developed.
3-1
3-2
Select NAMAs from shortlist to develop
short description.
Develop draft short descriptions for
selected NAMAs, including title, background,
purpose, summary, timeframe, responsible
organizations, preliminary assessment of technical
and economic feasibility, contribution to GHG
limitation and reduction, MRV, possible financing
means (e.g., national / EU / international funds,
public-private partnership (PPP) and Japanese yen
loan) and barriers
Present above-mentioned draft short
3-3 descriptions, obtain feedbacks and finalize
Produce a guideline for developing
3-4 NAMA short description.
4. Capacity to promote recognition of NAMAs is enhanced.
Establish webpage on Serbian NAMAs
4-1 and MRV.
Develop promotion materials on project
4-2 for presentations.
Present progress and outcome of project at
4-3 international conference.
Present outcome of project to national
4-4 stakeholders.
ῧ௜㈨ᩱ㸰 ᴗົࣇ࣮ࣟࢳ࣮ࣕࢺ
1.1
Share
information
on NAMA/
MRV
2.1
Select pilot
sectors/ subsectors
Establish
working
groups
Phase III
May 2012 - Feb 2013
2.1
Collect information on
NAMA
candidates
2.1
Select pilot
sectors/ subsectors
2.2
Develop long
list
2.3
Develop
NAMA Matrix
of Serbia
2.4
Develop short
list
4.2
Prepare and
implement
side event at
COP17
2.5
Develop
NAMA shortlisting
guideline
Legend:
JCC
Meeting
Activities related to Output 2) Development of capacity to shortlist MRV-able NAMAs
Activity related to Ou tput 3) Development of capacity to produce documents for promoting NAM A implementation
Activity in Japan
Submission of reports
Project Activity Flow
(4.2)
(Prepare and
implement
side event at
COP18)
JCC
Meeting
Collect information on NAMA/ MRV
Activities related to Output 1) Enhancement of general understanding on NAMAs and MRV
Activities related to Output 4) Enhancement of capacity to promote NAMA recognition
3.1
Develop NAMA
short
description
4.1
Update web
contents
4.1
Develop and update web contents
Collect information on NAMA/ MRV
Conduct
training in
Japan
4.3
Plan and hold
NAMA/MRV
workshop
4.3
Plan and hold
NAMA/MRV
workshop
JCC
Meeting
Develop, discuss, and submitProject Completion Report
Collect
information
on NAMA/
MRV
1.2
Share NAMA
Matrix of
other
countries
Phase II
May 2011 - Mar 2012
Discuss and submit Work Plan (Phase III)
Project Activity
Develop
NAMA Matrix
of other
countries
Jan 2011 - Feb 2011
Develop, discuss, and submit Project Progress Report
Dec 2010
Discuss and submit Work Plan (Phase I and II)
Month
Develop, discuss, and submitProject Progress Report
Phase I
Phase
ῧ௜㈨ᩱ㸱 ᑓ㛛ᐙάືᐇ⦼
M. FUJIMOTO
K. YAMADA
H. MATSUOKA
T. YOSHIDA
Y. MORITA
Chief Advisor/
Climate Change Policy 1
Climate Change Policy 2
Economic Evaluation
of Energy Efficiency Measures
Dupty Chief Adviser/
GHG Limitation/ Reduction Quantification
in Energy 1
GHG Limitation/ Reduction Quantification
in Energy 2
M. FUJIMOTO
H. MATSUOKA
T. YOSHIDA
Chief Advisor/
Climate Change Policy 1
Economic Evaluation
of Energy Efficiency Measures
Dupty Chief Adviser/
GHG Limitation/ Reduction Quantification
in Energy 1
GHG Limitation/ Reduction Quantification
E. WATATSU
in Energy 4
GHG Limitation/ Reduction Quantification
W. MORIMOITO
in Energy 3
Name
Assignment
GHG Limitation/ Reduction Quantification
W. MORIMOITO
in Energy 3
Name
Assignment
Feb.
10(0.33)
Feb.
56(1.90)
25(0.83)
Jan.
Phase II
21(0.70)
24(0.80)
Jan.
Phase I
Mar.
Mar.
Apr.
Apr.
36(1.20)
39(1.30)
21(0.7)
38(1.27)
25(0.83)
May
40(1.33)
21(0.70)
2012
June July
30(1.00)
Aug.
42(1.40)
33(1.10)
51(1.70)
33(1.10)
24(0.80)
Dec.
23(0.76)
31(1.03)
Nov.
21(0.70)
Oct.
40(1.33)
Sep.
Dec.
22(0.73)
Nov.
70(2.33)
Oct.
29(0.97) 24(0.80)
Sep.
Phase III
47(1.57)
Aug.
Phase II
9(0.30)
42(1.40)
43(1.43)
May
2011
June July
39(1.30)
42(1.40)
16(0.53)
26(0.87)
2013
Jan. Feb.
ῧ௜㈨ᩱ㸲 ྜྠㄪᩚጤဨ఍㆟஦㘓
0LQXWHVRIWKH6HFRQG-RLQW&RRUGLQDWLQJ&RPPLWWHH0HHWLQJRQWKH³&DSDFLW\'HYHORSPHQW
3URMHFWRQ1DWLRQDOO\$SSURSULDWH0LWLJDWLRQ$FWLRQV1$0$V´
0HHWLQJ0HPRUDQGXPIRUQG-RLQW&RRUGLQDWLQJ&RPPLWWHH
'DWHDQGWLPH-XQH
9HQXH0(063&RQIHUHQFHURRP
3DUWLFLSDQWV
2UJDQL]DWLRQ
0LQLVWU\RI
(QYLURQPHQW0LQLQJ
DQG6SDWLDO3ODQQLQJ
0(063
0LQLVWU\RI
,QIUDVWUXFWXUHDQG
(QHUJ\0,(
6HUELDQ(QHUJ\
(IILFLHQF\$JHQF\
6(($
-,&$%DONDQ2IILFH
-,&$([SHUW7HDP
1DPH
0U0LURVODY7DGLF
7LWOH
+HDGRI'HSDUWPHQWIRU,QWHUQDWLRQDO
&RRSHUDWLRQDQG(XURSHDQ,QWHJUDWLRQV
0V'DQLMHOD%R]DQLF
+HDGRI&OLPDWH&KDQJH'LYLVLRQ
0V$QD5HSDF
-XQLRU$GYLVRULQ&OLPDWH&KDQJH
'LYLVLRQ&&'
0V'UDJDQD5DGXORYLF -XQLRU$GYLVRULQ&OLPDWH&KDQJH
'LYLVLRQ
0U0LURVODY
+HDGRI'HSDUWPHQWIRU6XVWDLQDEOH
6SDVRMHYLF
'HYHORSPHQW
0V0LRPLUD/D]RYLF
7UDLQLQJDQG(GXFDWLRQ$GYLVRU
0U6DWRUX.XURVDZD
0V6DLWR<XPLNR
0U0DVDKLNR)XMLPRWR
0U7HWVX\D<RVKLGD
0U%UDQLVODY=LYNRYLF
0V6YHWODQD%DWULFHYLF
5HVLGHQW5HSUHVHQWDWLYH
3URMHFW)RUPXODWLRQ2IILFHU
&KLHI$GYLVRU
'HSXW\&KLHI$GYLVRU
/RFDO&RQVXOWDQW
3URMHFW$VVLVWDQW
2YHUDOOSURJUHVVRIWKH3URMHFW
-,&$ ([SHUW 7HDP RSHQHG WKH QG -RLQW &RRUGLQDWLQJ &RPPLWWHH PHHWLQJ E\ JLYLQJ
LQWURGXFWRU\ UHPDUNV RQ WKH SURJUHVV RI -,&$ 7HFKQLFDO &RRSHUDWLRQ 3URMHFW DQG DOVR
SUHVHQWHGWKHZRUNVFKHGXOHDQGPLOHVWRQHVIURP0D\WR0DUFK
7KH SURJUHVV RI DFWLYLWLHV JHQHUDO SURFHVV RI 1$0$ ORQJ OLVW IRUPXODWLRQ DQG VWHSV ZKLFK
DUHEHLQJXQGHUWDNHQZHUHDOVRSUHVHQWHG
/RQJOLVWSUHSDUDWLRQDFWLYLW\FRRUGLQDWLRQLVVXHZLWKRWKHUDJHQFLHV
-,&$([SHUW7HDPSUHVHQWHGWKHSURJUHVVRIORQJOLVWSUHSDUDWLRQ&XUUHQWORQJOLVWFRQWDLQV
1$0$ FDQGLGDWHV IURP WKUHH WDUJHW VHFWRUV HQHUJ\ JHQHUDWLRQ WUDQVSRUW DQG KRXVLQJ
EXLOGLQJ:RUNLQJ*URXSLVFXUUHQWO\WU\LQJWRREWDLQGHWDLOHGGDWDDQGLQIRUPDWLRQRQHDFK
RI 1$0$ FDQGLGDWHV &HUWDLQ LVVXHV ZHUH UDLVHG GXULQJ WKLV PHHWLQJ LH LQVXIILFLHQW
SDUWLFLSDWLRQ DQG LQYROYHPHQW RI DJHQFLHV UHVSRQVLEOH IRU WUDQVSRUW DQG EXLOGLQJ VHFWRUV
'HVSLWH IUHTXHQW UHTXHVWV IURP 0(063 &OLPDWH &KDQJH 'LYLVLRQ WKH 6HFWRU IRU
&RQVWUXFWLRQ,QYHVWPHQWDQG&RQVWUXFWLRQODQGRI0(063DQGWKH7UDQVSRUWDWLRQVHFWRURI
0,(KDYHQRWQRPLQDWHGUHVSRQVLEOHSHUVRQVIRUWKH:RUNLQJ*URXS,WZDVDJUHHGWKDWWKH
:RUNLQJ *URXS ZLOO FRQWLQXRXVO\ UHTXHVW WKHVH UHVSRQVLEOH DJHQFLHV IRU IXUWKHU DQG PRUH
SURIRXQGLQYROYHPHQW
&RQFHUQLQJWKHHQHUJ\VHFWRUDPHHWLQJZLWKWKH(OHFWULF3RZHU,QGXVWU\RI6HUELD(36KDV
EHHQFRQILUPHGRQFHJDLQE\0U6SDVRMHYLFDQGLVWREHDJUHHGRQLQWKHQH[WSHULRG
$QRWKHU PHHWLQJ ZLWK WKH UHSUHVHQWDWLYHV RI WKH &LW\ RI %HOJUDGH LV WR EH DJUHHG XSRQ RQ
SURSRVDOE\0U6SDVRMHYLFVSHFLILFDOO\6HFUHWDULDWIRU(QHUJ\ LQ RUGHU WR LGHQWLI\SURMHFWV
RQWKHFLW\OHYHOSRWHQWLDOO\WREHLQFOXGHGLQWR1$0$ORQJOLVW
)XUWKHUFRRSHUDWLRQZLWKWKH&OLPDWH&KDQJH'LYLVLRQRI0(036DQGWKH(QHUJ\6HFWRURI
0,( ZDV KLJKO\ UHFRPPHQGHG DW WKH PHHWLQJ $OVR 6(($ VXJJHVWHG WKH :RUNLQJ *URXS
VKRXOGGLUHFWO\FRQWDFWPXQLFLSDOLWLHVZKRKDYHILUVWKDQGGDWDDQGLQIRUPDWLRQWKDWPD\EH
LQFOXGHGLQWKHORQJOLVW
2WKHUV
0,(VXJJHVWHGWRVWDUWFRQVLGHUDWLRQRI059DQG059LQVWLWXWLRQLQWKHFRXUVHRIWKH
3URMHFWDFWLYLW\6SHFLDODWWHQWLRQQHHGVWREHSDLGWRVHFWRUDOGLIIHUHQFHVLQ059
UHTXLUHPHQWV
3UHSDUHGE\6YHWODQD%DWULFHYLF
1$0$V3URMHFW$VVLVWDQW
0LQXWHVRIWKH7KLUG-RLQW&RRUGLQDWLQJ&RPPLWWHH0HHWLQJRQWKH³&DSDFLW\'HYHORSPHQW
3URMHFWRQ1DWLRQDOO\$SSURSULDWH0LWLJDWLRQ$FWLRQV1$0$V´
0HHWLQJ0HPRUDQGXPIRUUG-RLQW&RRUGLQDWLQJ&RPPLWWHH
'DWHDQGWLPH1RYHPEHU
9HQXH0(063&RQIHUHQFHURRP
3DUWLFLSDQWV
2UJDQL]DWLRQ
0LQLVWU\RI
(QYLURQPHQW0LQLQJ
DQG6SDWLDO3ODQQLQJ
0(063
0LQLVWU\RI
,QIUDVWUXFWXUHDQG
(QHUJ\0,(
6HUELDQ(QHUJ\
(IILFLHQF\$JHQF\
6(($
-,&$%DONDQ2IILFH
-,&$([SHUW7HDP
1DPH
0V'DQLMHOD%R]DQLF
0V$QD5HSDF
7LWOH
+HDGRI&OLPDWH&KDQJH'LYLVLRQ
-XQLRU$GYLVRULQ&OLPDWH&KDQJH
'LYLVLRQ
0U0LURVODY
6SDVRMHYLF
0U%RMDQ.RYDFLF
+HDGRI'HSDUWPHQWIRU6XVWDLQDEOH
'HYHORSPHQW
'HSXW\'LUHFWRU
0U6DWRUX.XURVDZD
0U1REXR6XJLXUD
0V1DWDVD%RJRMHYLF
0U7HWVX\D<RVKLGD
0U:DWDUX0RULPRWR
0U+LURVKL0DWVXRND
0U%UDQLVODY=LYNRYLF
0V6YHWODQD%DWULFHYLF
5HVLGHQW5HSUHVHQWDWLYH
$VVLVWDQW5HVLGHQW5HSUHVHQWDWLYH
3URJUDPPH2IILFHU
'HSXW\&KLHI$GYLVRU
-,&$([SHUW7HDP
-,&$([SHUW7HDP
/RFDO&RQVXOWDQW
3URMHFW$VVLVWDQW
3URJUHVVDQGRXWFRPHRIWKHSURMHFW
-,&$ ([SHUW 7HDP RSHQHG WKH UG -RLQW &RRUGLQDWLQJ &RPPLWWHH PHHWLQJ E\ SUHVHQWLQJ WKH
SURJUHVVDQGRXWFRPHRI-,&$7HFKQLFDO&RRSHUDWLRQ3URMHFWDQGWKH1$0$IRUPXODWLRQ
5HVXOWRIORQJOLVWHYDOXDWLRQ
-,&$([SHUW7HDPSUHVHQWHGWKHORQJOLVWRI1$0$VZKLFKFRQWDLQV1$0$FDQGLGDWHV
$OVR SUHVHQWHG ZDV WKH OLVW RI LQWHUYLHZV ZLWK SURVSHFWLYH 1$0$ HQWLWLHV DQG VLWH YLVLWV LQ
%HOJUDGHDQGWKURXJKRXW6HUELDZKLFKZHUHDLPHGDWSURYLGLQJGHWDLOHGLQIRUPDWLRQDERXWWKH
SRWHQWLDOSURMHFWV2YHUYLHZRI:RUNLQJ*URXSPHHWLQJVKHOGVLQFHWKHODVW-&&PHHWLQJZDV
DOVRSUHVHQWHG
-,&$ ([SHUW 7HDP IXUWKHU SUHVHQWHG HYDOXDWLRQ FULWHULD ZKLFK ZHUH MRLQWO\ GHYHORSHG E\
0(063DQG-,&$([SHUW7HDPDQGDJUHHGZLWK:RUNLQJ*URXSPHPEHUV7KHFULWHULDPD\
KDYHWREHUHYLVHGXSRQRXWFRPHVIURPIRUWKFRPLQJLQWHUQDWLRQDOQHJRWLDWLRQVRQ1$0$DQG
059 7KH 7HDP SUHVHQWHG WKH VWDJHV LQ WKH SURFHVV RI HYDOXDWLQJ WKH 1$0$ FDQGLGDWHV
ZKLFK LQFOXGH WKH FDWHJRULHV RI EDVLF DQG JHQHUDO FRQGLWLRQV IRU WKH ILUVW VFUHHQLQJ DQG
VXVWDLQDELOLW\ 059DELOLW\ PHDVXULQJ UHSRUWLQJ DQG YHULILFDWLRQ IRU WKH VHFRQG VFUHHQLQJ
7KH ILQDO UHVXOW RI ORQJ OLVW HYDOXDWLRQ ZDV SUHVHQWHG DQG WKH UHDVRQV ZK\ FHUWDLQ SURSRVHG
1$0$VGLGQRWSDVVWKHVFUHHQLQJVVXFKDVQRQH[LVWHQFHRIDFRQFUHWHSURMHFWLQVXIILFLHQW
GDWDRUILQDQFLDOIHDVLELOLW\
0U<RVKLGDSUHVHQWHGDVXPPDU\RIVKRUWOLVWHG1$0$VEHORQJLQJWRWKUHHVXEVHFWRUV
HQHUJ\ WUDQVSRUW DQG EXLOGLQJ VXEVHFWRUV 2QH TXDUWHU RI WKH SURSRVHG SURMHFWV KDV SDVVHG
WKH VFUHHQLQJ DQG WKH\ ZHUH VKRUWOLVWHG $OO 1$0$V ZLOO EH DQ LQWHUQDWLRQDO VXSSRUWHG
1$0$H[FHSWIRUWKHSURMHFWQXPEHUZKLFKLVH[SHFWHGWREHDGRPHVWLF1$0$DQGZLOO
QRWVHHNLQWHUQDWLRQDOVXSSRUW
0U <RVKLGD DOVR PHQWLRQHG WKH 6KRUWOLVW FRQWDLQV 1$0$V ZLWK ODUJH *+* HPLVVLRQ
UHGXFWLRQDQGUDWKHUVPDOOUHGXFWLRQEXWWKH3URMHFWZLOOQRWFRQVLGHUWKHVL]HRIWKHUHGXFWLRQ
DV D GHFLVLYH IDFWRU WR EH DQ DSSURSULDWH 1$0$ RU QRW ,Q WKLV VHQVH SURMHFWV ZLWK VPDOO
DPRXQW RI HPLVVLRQ UHGXFWLRQ FDQ VWLOO EH D 1$0$ RI 6HUELD DV ORQJ DV WKH\ VDWLVI\ DOO
VHOHFWLRQFULWHULD
2YHUYLHZRIVKRUWOLVWHG1$0$V
0V$QD5HSDFJDYHDSUHVHQWDWLRQRQVKRUWOLVWHG1$0$VDQGSURYLGHGEDVLFLQIRUPDWLRQ
DERXW HDFK SURMHFW SURJUDP 6KH SUHVHQWHG HYHU\ SURMHFW VHSDUDWHO\ DQG LQIRUPHG WKH
PHPEHUVRIWKH-&&KRZWKH\ZRXOGFRQWULEXWHWRFOLPDWHFKDQJHPLWLJDWLRQDQGVSHFLILHG
LPSOHPHQWLQJ HQWLWLHV IRU HDFK SURMHFW DV ZHOO DV WKH H[SHFWHG DQQXDO *+* UHGXFWLRQ 0V
5HSDF DOVR SURYLGHG WKH LQIRUPDWLRQ RQ ILQDQFLDO IHDVLELOLW\ WHFKQLFDO YLDELOLW\ DQG
059DELOLW\IRUDOOWKHPHQWLRQHGSURMHFWV
0U <RVKLGD LQIRUPHG WKH SDUWLFLSDQWV WKDW PRVW RI WKH VKRUWOLVWHG 1$0$V KDYH RQO\
SUHOLPLQDU\ ILQDQFLDO DQDO\VLV DQG WKDW PDQ\ LPSOHPHQWLQJ HQWLWLHV KDG QRW HVWDEOLVKHG
PHWKRGV RI ILQDQFLDO DQDO\VLV EHFDXVH WKH\ DUH QRW VXUH ZKDW WKH UHTXLUHPHQWV DUH DQG
DQQRXQFHG WKDW WKH 3URMHFW ZLOO KROG D )LQDQFLDO :RUNVKRS RQ 'HFHPEHU DQG LQYLWH
ZRUNLQJ JURXS PHPEHUV DQG 1$0$ LPSOHPHQWLQJ HQWLWLHV WR SDUWLFLSDWH 0U 0DWVXRND D
ILQDQFLDO H[SHUW RI -,&$ ([SHUW 7HDP ZLOOSUHVHQW ZKDWNLQGV RI ILQDQFLDODQDO\VLVRSWLRQV
H[LVWDQGZKDWLQIRUPDWLRQLVQHFHVVDU\
0U6SDVRMHYLFSURSRVHGWKDW&DSLWDO,QYHVWPHQW)XQGVKRXOGEHLQIRUPHGDERXWWKH1$0$V
SURMHFW EHFDXVH WKLV LQVWLWXWLRQ LV QRW DZDUH RI LWV H[LVWHQFH 0U .RYDFLF VXJJHVWHG WKDW WKH
0LQLVWU\ RI )LQDQFH VKRXOG EH LQYLWHG WR WKH ZRUNVKRS DV WKH\ DOVR SDUWLFLSDWH LQ SURMHFWV
UHODWHGWRHQHUJ\HIILFLHQF\
2YHUYLHZRIWKH&23VLGHHYHQWSUHVHQWDWLRQ
0V%R]DQLFEULHIO\LQIRUPHGWKHSDUWLFLSDQWVDERXWWKH&23VLGHHYHQWDQGWKHLQWHQWLRQRI
WKH0LQLVWU\RI(QYLURQPHQW0LQLQJDQG6SDWLDO3ODQQLQJDQG-,&$WRSUHVHQWFXUUHQWUHVXOWV
RIWKHSURMHFWVIXWXUHSODQVDQGWKHSUREOHPVHQFRXQWHUHGGXULQJWKHSURFHVVRISUHSDUDWLRQRI
SRWHQWLDOSURMHFWV1$0$VSURMHFWLVWKHILUVWRILWVNLQGLQWKHZRUOGDQGWKHLQWHQWLRQLVWR
VKDUH WKH LQIRUPDWLRQ DERXW WKH SURMHFW 6KH VDLG WKDW DSDUW IURP 0U )XMLPRWR DV D -,&$
UHSUHVHQWDWLYHWKHUHSUHVHQWDWLYHVRIWKHPLQLVWU\ZLOOPDNHDSUHVHQWDWLRQRQWKHVKRUWOLVWHG
SURMHFWV
0U<RVKLGD DGGHGWKDWWKHKDQGRXWV DW WKH VLGH HYHQW ZLOO LQFOXGH1$0$SRUWIROLRV RI WKH
VKRUWOLVWHGSURMHFWV+HLQIRUPHGWKHSDUWLFLSDQWVWKDWWKHYHQXHLV&OLPDWH&KDQJH5HVSRQVH
([SRDGMDFHQWWRWKH&23PDLQYHQXHFDOOHG,&&0V%R]DQLFH[SODLQHGWKDWLWKDGEHHQWKH
ILUVW WLPH WKDW 6HUELD ZDV GHFOLQHG D VLGH HYHQW E\ WKH 81)&&& VHFUHWDULDW DQG WKDW QR
H[SODQDWLRQZDVRIIHUHG
-,&$([SHUW7HDPFRQFOXGHGWKHPHHWLQJE\PHQWLRQLQJWKH3URMHFWVFKHGXOHDIWHU&23VLGH
HYHQW LQFOXGLQJ WKH 1$0$ FDSDFLW\ EXLOGLQJ VHPLQDU LQ )HEUXDU\ $OVR PHQWLRQHG ZDV
ZKHWKHUDQH[W-&&PHHWLQJZLOOEHKHOGEHIRUHWKHVWDUWRIWKH3KDVHRIWKH3URMHFWLQ0D\
LVVWLOOXQNQRZQDQGWKHGDWHRIQH[WPHHWLQJZLOOEHDQQRXQFHGWRSDUWLFLSDQWVHDUO\
3UHSDUHGE\6YHWODQD%DWULFHYLF
1$0$V3URMHFW$VVLVWDQW
Fourth Joint Coordinating Committee Meeting on the
“Capacity Development Project on Nationally Appropriate Mitigation Actions (NAMAs)”
Meeting Memorandum for 4th Joint Coordinating Committee
Date and time: 6 March, 2012 14:00-15:40
Venue: MEMSP Conference room 204
Participants:
Organization
Ministry of
Environment, Mining
and Spatial Planning
(MEMSP)
Ministry of
Infrastructure and
Energy (MIE)
Serbian Energy
Efficiency Agency
(SEEA)
JICA Balkan Office
JICA Expert Team
Name
Ms. Danijela Bozanic
Ms. Ana Repac
Title
Head of Climate Change Division
Junior Advisor in Climate Change
Division
Mr. Miroslav
Spasojevic
Ms. Jelena Simovic
Mr. Bojan Kovacic
Head of Department for Sustainable
Development
Advisor in Department for Sustainable
Development
Deputy Director
Mr. Satoru Kurosawa
Ms. Yumiko Saito
Mr. Tetsuya Yoshida
Mr. Branislav Zivkovic
Ms. Svetlana Batricevic
Resident Representative
Project Formulation Officer
Deputy Chief Advisor
Local Consultant
Project Assistant
1. Project Activities
JICA Expert Team opened the 4th Joint Coordinating Committee meeting by presenting the
activities which were conducted in accordance with phases I and II of the Work Plan from
May 2011 to March 2012 and agreed by the JCC in January 2011.
Those activities include the enhancement of general understanding of NAMAs and MRV
(Activity 1), developing capacities to shortlist NAMAs which could be measured, reported
and verified (Activity 2) and collecting information on NAMA candidates. JICA Expert Team
presented the list of analysed documents used as sources of information in the process of
finding prospective NAMA candidates, such as laws, policies, strategies, action plans and
regulations.
Mr Yoshida explained the process of preparing NAMA information sheet which is designed
to collect detailed information on each mitigation action and what type of data a NAMA
information sheet includes. It was also pointed out that recent review of the data contained in
the developed NAMA information sheets includes certain errors in calculation such as the use
of inaccurate or wrong default values and miscalculation, which cause both higher and lower
emission reductions. Mr Sapsojevic enquired which default values should be used in
calculations, whether IPCC, CDM methodology or some other country specific emission
factor default values. Since default values have not yet been agreed, working group members
would discuss and determine which methodology would be proposed for implementing
entities to use during Phase 3 of the Project.
Mr Yoshida mentioned that MEMSP Climate Change Division and JICA Expert Team had a
series of meetings with a number of entities in order to assist them to fill in NAMA
information sheets and provide basic information about the NAMA project. He then pointed
to the list of interviews and site visits. In addition to this, a public call for a new NAMA was
announced on the ministry’s website.
Mr Spasojevic raised a concern about certain entities from the list of site visits from smaller
Serbian towns regarding their understanding of the benefits of NAMA project. He proposed
that institutions participating to this JCC should assist those communities in performing
necessary activities if potential projects are identified, given that those communities probably
do not have sufficient capacities.
Mr Yoshida further explained the process of NAMA Long List preparation. The long list
consists of 69 NAMA candidates from 3 target sub-sectors including energy, transport and
building sub-sectors. The largest portion of candidates (80%) involves construction or
installation of plant, facility or equipment.
Each of 69 NAMA candidates was evaluated according to NAMA shortlist selection criteria
established by the Climate Change Division and JICA Expert Team as well as the Working
Group members. The evaluation criteria were developed by the Project because there is no
guideline available by UNFCCC regarding NAMA development yet, and therefore the criteria
are subject to change. The criteria are divided in two steps and only those projects which met
all the first and second criteria were listed in the Shortlist. The result of the long list
evaluation is seventeen actions that met all the first criteria, and sixteen satisfied all the
second criteria. When the UNFCCC prepares its guideline, it will have to be integrated into
NAMA evaluation criteria, and especially those regarding MRV.
Mr Spasojevic mentioned EU Emission Trading Scheme and enquired if we could use this
scheme since it is similar to MRV. Ms Bozanic replied that it was not possible at the moment
until the EU Parliament adopted two relevant documents. But it will be used and referred in
analyzing MRV in more detail in Phase 3.
The list of 16 shortlisted candidates is provided. Mr Yoshida asked Mr Spasojevic if there
were any updates on the current status of the projects prepared by the MIE. Mr Spasojevic
replied there were no updates for the time being.
Mr Spasojevic raised a question how Japan can provide further assistance to these shortlisted
NAMAs and whether Japan’s Bilateral Offset Crediting Mechanism can be applied. Mr
Yoshida mentioned that Japan will be willing to assist mitigation activities from financial,
technical, or capacity building perspectives, and Bilateral mechanism could be one option.
Mr Yoshida presented the draft contents of the NAMA guideline. It is designed for climate
change mitigation-related stakeholders in Serbia who may implement NAMA in the future.
And therefore, the guideline will be prepared in Serbian but it is still necessary to discuss
whether the English version should be prepared as well.
A financial workshop was held in order to improve the capacity of Serbian stakeholders to
conduct financial analysis of NAMA. The purpose of this workshop was to increase
understanding of these stakeholders on general information about financial analysis as well as
what types of financial analysis could be applied to mitigation actions. This activity shall be
continued in Phase III in preparing NAMA short description.
Another activity involves the development of capacity to produce documents for promoting
NAMA implementation (Activity 3). Short description will be developed in Phase III for
several NAMAs from the Short list as pilot NAMAs for Short Description.
Fourth activity involves the capacity enhancement to promote NAMA recognition. For this
activity, web contents for MEMSP website were developed and uploaded both in Serbian and
English in order to enhance recognition and understanding by stakeholders on NAMA and
MRV. It was pointed out that it is not easy for web viewers to find the NAMA contents from
the MEMSP web top page and it needs to be improved.
Also, a side event seminar was held during the COP 17 period in December 2011 in Durban,
South Africa. It was pointed out that the number of participants to the seminar, 32, is
sufficient considering the fact that the event was held outside of the main venue.
NAMA seminar was held on February 6, 2012 with the objective to enhance recognition and
understanding on NAMA among the Serbian stakeholders. 62 stakeholders participated in the
seminar including the representatives of NAMA-related ministries and institutions in Serbia,
donor countries and international organizations, universities, private sector and NGO as well
as the media. A questionnaire was distributed to seminar participants and answers were
collected and analyzed. The result shows that the seminar was generally highly evaluated and
the objective of the seminar, which is to increase the understanding and recognition of NAMA
by stakeholders, was fulfilled.
2.
Schedule from May 2012 to February 2013
Mr Yoshida presented the plan of project activities for each work item during Phase III
including the development of capacities to shortlist NAMAs which can be measured, reported
and verified (Activity 2), the development of capacities to produce documents for promoting
NAMA implementation (Activity 3), the enhancement of capacities to promote NAMA
recognition (Activity 4) and the training in Japan. He presented a tentative program of training
in Japan and informed the participants that it had not yet been decided if two or three persons
would be sent to Japan. He asked the participants if they had any suggestions regarding the
organizations they would wish to visit during their stay in Japan.
3.
Project Design Matrix and Plan of Operation
Mr Yoshida presented the Project Design Matrix (PDM) and Plan of Operation (PO) which
was agreed before the start of the project. He proposed some modifications and after a
discussion the modifications were defined and agreed on. Modifications were applied to
Objectively Verifiable Indicators for Output 1 and Output 3, Means of Verification for Output
3, and Activities parts.
Mr Yoshida closed the meeting by consulting the JCC members on the issue of holding
additional JCC meetings before making important decisions. The JCC members agreed to
convene for additional JCC meetings when necessary.
Prepared by Svetlana Batricevic
NAMAs Project Assistant
Fifth Joint Coordinating Committee Meeting on the
“Capacity Development Project on Nationally Appropriate Mitigation Actions (NAMAs)”
Meeting Memorandum for 5th Joint Coordinating Committee
Date and time: 31 May, 2012 10:00-11:00
Venue: MEMSP Conference room 125
Participants:
Organization
Ministry of
Environment, Mining
and Spatial Planning
(MEMSP)
Ministry of
Infrastructure and
Energy (MIE)
Serbian Energy
Efficiency Agency
(SEEA)
Electric Power Industry
of Serbia (EPS)
JICA Balkan Office
JICA Expert Team
Name
Ms. Danijela Bozanic
Title
Head of Climate Change Division
Ms. Ana Repac
Junior Advisor in Climate Change
Division
Head of Department for Sustainable
Development and Climate Change in
Energy Sector
Deputy Director
Ms. Jelena Simovic
Mr. Bojan Kovacic
Mr. Miroslav Spasojevic
Mr. Ken Yamada
Ms. Yumiko Saito
Mr. Masahiko Fujimoto
Mr. Tetsuya Yoshida
Mr. Hiroshi Matsuoka
Ms. Eiko Watatsu
Mr. Branislav Zivkovic
Ms. Svetlana Batricevic
Resident Representative
Project Formulation Officer
Chief Advisor
Deputy Chief Advisor
JICA Expert
JICA Expert
Local Consultant
Project Assistant
Mr. Fujimotoopened the meeting by giving introductory remarks. He then presented the
outcomes achieved during Phase 2 of the project and also the work plan of Phase 3, which
will last from May 2012 to February 2013. General schedule during Phase 3 was also
presented to the participants including the terminal evaluation of the technical cooperation
project, which is tentatively set for January 2013.
Mr Yoshida went on to present the work plan of phase III of the project. He informed the
participants about project implementation method which consists of three activities including
development of capacity to produce documents for promoting NAMA implementation,
enhancement of capacity to promote NAMA recognition and technical training in Japan.
1. Short Description
The document to be developed is NAMA short description. Working group members will
select pilot NAMAs from the short list, whereas MEMSP, NAMA related agencies and JICA
expert team will develop short description of the selected pilot NAMAs through study
sessions. Format and contents of NAMA short description will be in line with biennial
updated report which Serbia should submit, and also in line with the recently developed
NAMA registry prototype. In the course of developing NAMA short description, finance
procurement options will be analyzed. Pilot NAMAs will be submitted to UNFCCC
Secretariat and the NAMA registry.
Mr Yoshida announced the next working group session for the following Wednesday (June 6)
and informed the JCC participants that working group members would be assigned to develop
NAMA short description for each selected pilot NAMA through a series of discussions at
working group sessions, and JICA expert team will provide support to working group
members. He then referred to NAMA short list and named the specific projects confirmed by
each entity.
Ms Simovic raised a question of responsible entity in relation to project number 8,
(“Introduction of Small Biomass Boilers in Serbia”). That issue is to be further discussed
whether the implementing entity is MEMSP and/or MIE.
Mr Yoshida introduced UNFCCC NAMA registry which serves for matching NAMAs of
Non-Annex I countries that are seeking support regarding financial and technical support as
well as support for capacity building, with Annex-I countries that will provide support.
2. NAMA Guideline
A guideline for short-listing NAMAs and developing NAMA short description will be
developed by Climate Change Division and JICA expert team. NAMA guideline will contain
background information, NAMA development cycle and MRV capacity development needs
for NAMA. Ms Bozanic suggested that working group members should be asked for
comments before finalizing the guideline. Mr Yoshida then raised the subject of the language
in which the guideline should originally be prepared. The JCC members agreed that the
English language version was more appropriate since it would be used internationally and
presented at COP 18.
3. NAMA promotion
In order to enhance the capacity to promote NAMA recognition, web contents for MEMSP
website have been developed and will be updated continuously. Promotion materials about
the project and outcomes will be developed and used at COP side event and the national
seminar in Serbia. Project’s progress and outcome will be presented at COP 18 and the
information is going to be shared with other developing countries. Japanese side intends to
send one JICA expert as a Serbian delegate to COP 18 and will ask Serbian side for approval.
The second national NAMA-MRV seminar/workshop will be held in Serbia where
stakeholders related to climate change mitigation would be invited, as well as government
agencies, private companies, donors and international organizations. Ms Bozanic remarked
that it would be important and beneficial to invite and attract some other institutions which are
not related to energy efficiency. Mr Spasojevic suggested that stakeholders should be
explained in advance about the background of NAMA and contents of the second
seminar/workshop. He also recommended that separate meetings should be organized with the
representatives of financial institutions and banks in order to explain the background of the
project and why it is important to participate in such projects.
4. Training in Japan
Mr Yoshida presented a tentative program of training in Japan for technical officers from the
Serbian side in order to further enhance their understanding on climate change mitigation
related issues. He reminded the participants that officers should be selected as soon as
possible because of the application procedure of JICA. The number of officers is three and
they should be very involved in this project from the beginning.
5. PDM
Mr Yoshida presented the Project Design Matrix (PDM) and JCC members discussed and
agreed to the following modifications to “Means of Verification and Inputs”.
1) Means of Verification
In order to verify the achievement of the Project purpose and outputs, Joint evaluation by
MEMSP and Project experts will be conducted at the end of the Project.
2)Inputs
Three persons will participate the training in Japan for two weeks.
Mr. Yamada explained that the procedure and schedule of terminal evaluation of the Project
will be set, and Mr. Ito, Assistant Resident Representative of JICA Balkan office, would be in
charge of the evaluation. He reminded that the Project should contribute to capacity
development of staff as well as organizations.
6. Operation
Mr. Kovacic requested JICA Expert Team to share the materials for the meeting in advance so
that participants can prepare for the meeting. JICA Expert Team agreed to his request.
Ms Bozanic thanked the participants for their time and effort. Mr Fujimoto closed the meeting
by requesting the JCC members to confirm their approval of the presented work plan by the
end of the following week.
Prepared by Svetlana Batricevic
NAMAs Project Assistant
Sixth Joint Coordinating Committee Meeting on the
“Capacity Development Project on Nationally Appropriate Mitigation Actions (NAMAs)”
Meeting Memorandum for 6th Joint Coordinating Committee
Date and time: 7 February 2013 10:00-11:30
Venue: MEMSP Conference room 125
Participants:
Organization
Ministry of Energy,
Development and
Environmental
Protection (MEDEP)
Name
Mr. Vladan Zdravkovic
State Secretary
Ms. Danijela Bozanic
Head of Climate Change Division
Ms. Ana Repac
Junior Advisor in Climate Change
Division
Head of Department for Sustainable
Development and Climate Change in
Energy Sector
Head of Department for Energy
Efficiency and Construction
Products
Department for Energy Efficiency
and Construction Products
Senior Engineer
Ms. Jelena Simovic
Ms. Jasminka Pavlovic
Ministry of
Construction and
Urbanism (MCU)
Electric Power Industry
of Serbia (EPS)
Ms. Nina Vukosavljevic
Mr. Dragan Vukotic
Mr. Ichiro Adachi
JICA H.Q.
Mr. Ken Okumura
JICA Evaluation Team
Ms. Rie Kawahara
Mr. Toshiya Abe
Ms. Yumiko Saito
Ms. Natasa Bogojevic
Mr. Masahiko Fujimoto
Mr. Tetsuya Yoshida
Mr. Hiroshi Matsuoka
Ms. Eiko Watatsu
Mr. Branislav Zivkovic
Ms. Svetlana Batricevic
JICA Balkan Office
JICA Expert Team
Title
Director – Environmental
Management Division 2
Deputy Assistant Director Environmental Management
Division 2
Evaluation Expert
Resident Representative
Project Formulation Officer
Chief Advisor
Deputy Chief Advisor
JICA Expert
JICA Expert
Local Consultant
Project Assistant
Mr Zdravkovic opened the meeting by expressing his gratitude to the Japanese side for
implementing NAMA project and for every project implemented since the year 2000. The
ministry emphasized the importance of emission reductions as the levels were dangerously
high in Serbia and the need for sustainable solution increases. He expressed hope that the joint
project would help Serbia improve its current situation in accordance with international
regulations.
Mr Adachi greeted the participants of the meeting and introduced himself. He expressed his
gratitude to the Climate Change Division of MEDEP and project team members.
Ms Kawahara presented the results of joint terminal evaluation of the Project and concluded
the capacity to formulate and promote NAMA by Serbian side has been developed
successfully. The achievement includes at least three persons in Climate Change Division of
MEDEP and at least one person in each organization participating in working group who
sufficiently understand the process of NAMA planning, as well as the development of
documents in planning NAMAs. It is expected that the overall goal will be carried out within
3-5 years from February 2013.
Ms Kawahara proceeded with evaluation results related to five criteria. The first criterion was
relevance and it was evaluated by the highest rate very high. The purpose of the project is
consistent with Serbian government’s environmental policy. Serbia is a member country of
UNFCCC and an EU candidate, and has to comply with EU directives in the field of climate
change. The project also meets the needs of targeted beneficiaries. The project is in line with
the Japanese government’s foreign policy on contributing to global measures against climate
change.
The second criterion effectiveness is rated as high. The planned four outputs are mostly
achieved as a result of project activities. The importance of NAMA in the framework of
UNFCCC did not decrease and it became more increasing. Two reorganizations of
government ministries and agencies caused a slight delay of the project. Working group
members are very satisfied with the opportunities for exchanging information and sharing
knowledge through a series of seminars, workshops and working group meetings.
The third criterion is efficiency and is rated as high. The inputs from both Serbian and
Japanese sides are rated as appropriate and used efficiently to produce the expected outputs.
However, there were some difficulties in time allocation and concentration on project
activities by Serbian side due to the limited number of employees.
The fourth criterion impact is rated as prospected to be fair to high. Series of documents and
templates for NAMA planning and development were produced under the project and they are
the first attempts to generate those documents in the world. Capacity and awareness increased
among the counterparts and working group members will be useful assets for planning the
implementation of NAMAs in the future.
The fifth criterion sustainability is rated as prospected to be fair to high. There is no doubt
that the Project Purpose to build capacities and awareness on NAMA will indirectly
contribute to great socioeconomic benefits by reducing GHG emissions through increasing
energy efficiency. It is anticipated that national policies and political support in Serbia on
supporting NAMA and UNFCCC will not be changed. The counterparts and working group
members have good knowledge and technical capacity. The working group members are
expected to be key persons to transfer their knowledge and increased awareness within their
agencies/entities after the Project. However, the limited number of employees is one of major
concerns and the question remains how sustainability can be assured in this situation.
Ms Kawahara concluded her report by saying that the Project had successfully completed
most of the planned tasks for the anticipated outputs.
Ms Bozanic briefly presented the recommendations, good practices and lessons learnt. She
stated that the most important task at the moment was to submit NAMA Short Descriptions to
NAMA Registry of UNFCCC Secretariat. It is necessary to establish a responsible institution
which is going to be a focal point in order to provide support to different institutions in
various sectors of NAMA planning. Ms Bozanic emphasized the importance of the
availability and quality of data for GHG emission calculation. She referred to the engagement
of local consultant and assistant and said that it contributed to more efficient capacity building.
The local consultant provided support in identification of appropriate NAMAs and checking
data quality, while the project assistant performed time-consuming administrative and
technical tasks. She also explained that it is important to establish cooperation with different
stakeholders from the beginning of the project in order to clearly define the role and
importance of stakeholders and establish relations with them. Finally, she mentioned the
Project products including the NAMA Development Guideline of the Republic of Serbia,
series of documents and templates of NAMA planning which are produced as one of the first
cases in the world and they could be valuable national assets.
Mr Fujimoto expressed his appreciation of the State Secretary, Climate Change Division of
MEDEP and Working Group members. He expects that NAMA projects will be promoted and
new NAMAs will be prepared using the knowledge and tools established in this project. He
also expressed his gratitude to local staff and JICA Balkan and JICA Headquarters. He stated
that two more weeks remain to finish the remaining tasks, including the finalization of
NAMA related documents and the preparation of the Project Activity Completion Report.
Ms Saito expressed her gratitude to Ms Bozanic for her assessment report and contribution to
the Project. Ms Saito wanted to know how the Ministry of Energy, Development and
Environmental Protection would overcome the problem related to the limited number of staff,
since the achievement was weakened due to insufficient number of employees in the past
three years.
Mr Zdravkovic replied that he was aware of all these issues and the Ministry would request
the Government to allow another position within the Climate Change Division in order to
make a better internal organization.
Mr Adachi added that the results of the Project are significant and he referred to the
preparation of the guideline and short description documents as very important.
Mr Zdravkovic expressed his gratitude to everyone for their hard work, commitment and his
hope that the project would help reduce CO2 emissions in Serbia.
Mr Zdravkovic and Mr Adachi signed the minutes of meeting between the Japanese Terminal
Evaluation Team and the Ministry of Energy, Development and Environmental Protection on
Capacity Development Project on Nationally Appropriate Mitigation Actions in the Republic
of Serbia.
Prepared by Svetlana Batricevic
NAMA Project Assistant
ῧ௜㈨ᩱ㸳 ྛᅜ NAMA ศ㢮࣐ࢺࣜࢵࢡࢫ
Cogeneration
Cogeneration
Cogeneration
Cogeneration
Cooking stove
Cooking stove
Cooking stove
Cooking stove
Cooking stove
Cooking stove
Energy
Energy
Energy
Energy
Energy
Energy
Energy
Energy
Energy
Energy
Energy
E-3
E-4
E-5
E-6
E-7
E-8
E-9
E-10
E-11
E-12
E-13
E-14 Energy
E-15 Energy
E-16 Energy
E-17 Energy
E-18 Energy
E-19 Energy
Cogeneration
Boiler upgrade
Boiler upgrade
Boiler upgrade
Boiler upgrade
Biofuel
Biofuel
Biofuel
Energy
E-2
Biofuel
Sub-sector
Energy
Sector
E-1
No.
Madagascar
Mauritania
Ghana
Cote d'Ivoire
Mongolia
Macedonia
Tunisia
Tunisia
Central African
Republic
Republic of
Congo
Measures
Measures
Measures
Measures
Measures
Promotion of improved cooking stoves for better
combustion
Take actions to economize firewood by promoting
better combustion techniques through the promotion
of improved cooking stoves
Residential cooking: promote the use of energy
efficiency cooking devices and clean carbonization
technologies
Control of conventional energy source in Mauritania:
use improved cooking stoves
Take actions to economize firewood by promoting
better combustion techniques through the promotion
of improved cooking stoves
Measures
Measures
Measures
Measures
Measures
Utilization of improved cooking stoves
Improve efficiency at cogeneration plants
Build CHP plants
Develop cogeneration
Develop trigeneration
Energy production through cogeneration in enhanced
Measures
forestry concessions
Republic of
Congo
Measures
Measures
Measures
Macedonia
Macedonia
Mongolia
Mongolia
Measures
Measures
Mandatory 20% biofuel blend by 2020:
Stimulate the growth of biofuel production such as
ethanol and biodiesel without threatening the natural
forest, or any Colombian food security, strengthening Measures
the participation of these fuels in the domestic market
until 2020 at the mandatory blending of at least 20 %
of total volume of fuel used.
Measures
Land preparation:incentive use of bio-fuels for
mechanized agriculture
Promotion of renewable energy: use of biofuels
Measures
Category
Bio-fuel Development for Road Transport and for
household use: Project to produce 63.36 million L of
ethanol, produce 621.6 million L of biodiesel
NAMA
Improve efficiency of existing heating boilers/
introduce new high-efficient heating boilers
Convert steam boilers into small capacity thermal
power plants
Improve boiler efficiency
Replace old boilers
Colombia
Chad
Ghana
Ethiopia
Party
NAMA Matrix of Other Parties
Program
Program
Program
Program
Program
Program
Program
Program
Program
Program
Program
Program
Program
Program
Program
Policy
Program
Program
Project
Sub-category
National
National
National
National
National
National
National
local
National
National
National
National
National
National
National
National
National
National
National
Boundary
Reference
Scenario
NAMA
Target
Action with financial support
Condition
Electricity Grid
Electricity Grid
Electricity Grid
Electricity Grid
Electricity Grid
Electricity Grid
E-23 Energy
E-24 Energy
E-25 Energy
E-26 Energy
E-27 Energy
E-28 Energy
Macedonia
Ghana
Ghana
Ghana
Ghana
Ghana
Ghana
Energy efficiency programs
Measures
Measures
Measures
Measures
Measures
Measures
Expand and maintain electricity distribution systems
timely bases
Increase rate of rural electrification
Reduce losses in electricity transmission and
distribution lines
Measures
Standardize of transformers
Measures
Energy efficiency Armenia
Energy
Energy
Energy
Energy
Energy efficiency San Marino
Energy efficiency Tunisia
E-33 Energy
E-34 Energy
E-35 Energy
E-36 Energy
E-37 Energy
E-38 Energy
Develop energy efficiency program in tertiary sector
Promote energy saving and rational energy use at
transport, production, housing and tertiary sectors
Measures
Measures
Program
Program
Program
Program
program
program
Program
Program
Program
Program
Project
Program
Program
Program
Program
project
Reinforce transmission systems to reduce
transmission loses to 3%
Balance the generation and transmission systems
Program
Expand grid access to discourage the need for off-grid
Measures
generation
Measures
Program
Measures
Improvement of reliability of electricity supply
(improvement of maintenance, timely expansion and
upgrading)
Program
Sub-category
Measures
Category
Introduce more efficient cooking stoves
NAMA
improvement of energy efficiency in all sectors of the
Measures
economy;
Program on the creation of new urban zones,
Central African integration of principles of optimization in energy
efficiency
Measures
Republic
consumption and limitation in the spread of urban
constructions
Implementation of a new Energy/Industry program
Central African on rural habitats aiming for the construction of
efficiency
Measures
Republic
ecological villages integrating energy efficiency and
renewable energy
Republic of
efficiency
Control of energy efficiency
Measures
Congo
Rationalize and modernize energy transport and
efficiency San Marino
Measures
supply networks, relevant plants
Energy efficiency Jordan
E-32 Energy
E-31 Energy
E-30 Energy
E-29 Energy
Electricity Grid
E-22 Energy
Ghana
Togo
Party
Central African
Energy efficiency
Control of conventional energy sources
Republic
Develop and implement energy conservation and
Energy efficiency Eritrea
efficiency projects
Electricity Grid
E-21 Energy
Sub-sector
Cooking stove
Sector
E-20 Energy
No.
NAMA Matrix of Other Parties
National
National
National
National
Local
Local
National
National
National
National
National
National
National
National
National
National
National
National
National
Boundary
Reference
Scenario
NAMA
Target
services supplied
being equal
Condition
Tunisia
Gabon
Armenia
Heating
Heating
Heating
Heating
Heating
House and
building
House and
building
E-43 Energy
E-44 Energy
E-45 Energy
E-46 Energy
E-47 Energy
E-48 Energy
E-49 Energy
Lighting
Energy
E-57
Lighting
E-56 Energy
E-55 Energy
E-54 Energy
E-53 Energy
E-52 Energy
E-51 Energy
House and
building
House and
building
House and
building
House and
building
House and
building
House and
building
Colombia
General policy
and measure
E-42 Energy
E-50 Energy
Macedonia
Financial
measure
E-41 Energy
Mauritania
Madagascar
Chad
Tunisia
Tunisia
Tunisia
Mongolia
Mongolia
Macedonia
Macedonia
Mongolia
Mongolia
Jordan
Financial
measure
Party
E-40 Energy
Sub-sector
Energy efficiency Morocco
Sector
E-39 Energy
No.
Measures
Measures
Measures
Category
Measures
Measures
Energy efficiency in urban and rural settings reduction of energy consumption: replacement of
high consumption lamps with energy efficient lamps
Program
Program
Program
Program
Program
Program
Energy efficiency in urban and rural areas: Extension
Measures
of energy efficient wooden houses
Popularize low energy-consumption lamps
National
National
National
National
National
National
Local
National
National
National
National
National
National
National
National
Law/
National
regulation
Program
Program
Program
Program
Program
Program
Project
Policy
Program
Measures
Measures
Measures
Measures
Measures
National
National
Boundary
Law/
National
regulation
Policy
Program
Sub-category
Measures
Improve energy efficiency in buildings
Construct solar-energy houses
Construct energy efficient buildings and houses
Improve insulation at houses and buildings
Regulate room temperature at residential houses for
heating
improvement of energy efficiency in buildings and
constructions;
Measures
Measures
Introduce solar heating system in hotels, hospitals,
school, public buildings, health resorts, etc.)
Enhancing energy efficiency in public buildings and
industrial units: construction of buildings and
industrial units with low energy consumption
Measures
Maintain clean heat exchange surfaces to achieve
better insulation
Measures
Measures
Reduce heat distribution loss through minimizing
leakage, replacing valves and compensators
Intensify solar water heating
Measures
Use electricity for local heating at Ulaanbaatar city
At least 77% of the total installed capacity will be
generated by renewable electricity sources by 2020, Measures
within the energy matrix.
Improve power plant efficiency by optimizing a
maintenance plan
Remove of customs and taxes on energy saving
technologies, such as: energy saving lightning
fixtures, hybrid cars, etc.
Establish legal regulations and tax relieve system for
energy efficiency
NAMA
NAMA Matrix of Other Parties
Reference
Scenario
NAMA
Target
Unilateral action
Condition
Lighting
Lighting
Lighting
Lighting
Lighting
Lighting
Lighting
E-61 Energy
E-62 Energy
E-63 Energy
E-64 Energy
E-65 Energy
E-66 Energy
E-67 Energy
Measures
Category
Measures
Measures
Measures
Measures
Measures
Fuel switch at household stoves from coal to LPG and
Measures
coal briquette
Measures
Measures
Energy efficiency in urban and rural settings reduction of energy consumption: use of butane gas
as a substitute for firewood;
Swtich from coal to liquid to gaseous fuels
Develop natural gas use in industrial sector
Natural gas use/
Mongolia
fuel switch
Natural gas use/
Macedonia
fuel switch
Natural gas use/ Central African Program for the import of natural gas (Butane),
fuel switch
Republic
targeting consumption by 80% of households
Introduce the use of gas as a substitute
Natural gas use/
Mauritania
fuel switch
Natural gas use/
Togo
fuel switch
Natural gas use/
Tunisia
fuel switch
E-71 Energy
E-72 Energy
E-73 Energy
E-74 Energy
E-75 Energy
E-76 Energy
Measures
Measures
Measures
Fuel switch: growing natural gas supply and
distribution; increase the contribution of the natural
gas to the national energy system
Natural gas use/
Jordan
fuel switch
Measures
Measures
Residential cooking: promote the use of LPG
Electricity supply: switch to natural gas (combined
cycle)
Distribution of 22.7 million light bulbs (LBC) for
Measures
homes and buildings by 2012, potential mitigation:
490 Kt CO2 per year.
Energy efficiency in urban and rural areas: Extension
Measures
of energy-saving lamps
Public lighting optimization, launch in 2009
Promote and support solar PV lighting
Promote tension switchers for public lighting
Introduce energy-saving light bulbs
Switch to CFL from incandescent light bulbs at houses
Measures
and commerical buildings
Introducing more efficient lamps and electric
Measures
appliances
Replace high consumption lamps with energy
Measures
efficient lamps
Promote low energy consumption lamps
NAMA
E-70 Energy
E-69 Energy
Chad
Morocco
Morocco
Ghana
Tunisia
Tunisia
Togo
Macedonia
Mongolia
Cote d'Ivoire
Party
Natural gas use/
Ghana
fuel switch
Natural gas use/
Ghana
fuel switch
Lighting
E-60 Energy
E-68 Energy
Lighting
E-59 Energy
Sub-sector
Lighting
Sector
E-58 Energy
No.
NAMA Matrix of Other Parties
Program
Program
Program
Program
Program
Program
Program
Program
Program
Program
Program
Program
Program
Program
Program
Program
Program
Program
Program
Sub-category
National
National
National
National
National
National
National
National
National
National
National
National
National
National
National
National
National
National
National
Boundary
Reference
Scenario
NAMA
Target
Condition
Increase import of natural gas, target 20% of natural
Measures
gas for domestic consumption in 2020, potential
mitigation: 6,421 kt CO2 per year
End-use: intensify public education on energy
conservation
Natural gas use/
Morocco
fuel switch
Ghana
Central African National awareness-raising campaign on energyRepublic
saving and the use of energy-saving lamps
San Marino
Sierra Leone
Macedonia
Morocco
Public
information
Public
information
Public
information
Public
information
Public
information
Public
information
Renewable /New
Jordan
energy
Renewable /New
Ethiopia
energy
Renewable /New
Macedonia
energy
E-80 Energy
E-81 Energy
E-82 Energy
E-83 Energy
E-84 Energy
E-85 Energy
E-86 Energy
E-87 Energy
E-88 Energy
E-89 Energy
Rehabilitate geothermal power system GeotermaKochani and others
Waste water and water sector: emission reduction
from waste water treatment plants by utilizing local
solar and wind energy (Aqaba, As-Sarma, Baqa'a,
Madaba, Ramtha, Salt and Wadi Arab)
Electricity generation from renewable energy for the
grid system
1-1Hydropower (on-going): Beles Project (460 MW);
Gibe III Project (1870 MW); Fan Project (100 MW);
Halele Werabesa Project (422 MW); Chemoga-Yeda
Project (278 MW); Gibe IV Project (1472 MW)
Awareness campaign for energy economics and
economic equipment, launched in 2009
Raise awareness to reduce energy consumption at
households (electricity and heat)
Develop energy efficiency Programrammes through
awareness raising campaigns
Promote energy saving and rational energy use
through information campaign
Develop new gas thermal power plants (CHP Skopje
230MW, CC gas 200-300MW)
Natural gas use/
Macedonia
fuel switch
E-79 Energy
Measures
Measures
Measures
Measures
Measures
Measures
Measures
Measures
Measures
Measures
Measures
Develop natural gas use in residential sector
Measures
Category
Natural gas use/
Tunisia
fuel switch
NAMA
E-78 Energy
Party
Develop natural gas use in tertiary sector
Sub-sector
Natural gas use/
Tunisia
fuel switch
Sector
E-77 Energy
No.
NAMA Matrix of Other Parties
Project
Project
Project
Program
Program
Project
Project
Program
Program
Policy
Project
Program
Program
Sub-category
local
Local
Local
National
National
National
National
National
National
National
local
National
National
Boundary
Reference
Scenario
NAMA
Target
Condition
Sector
Party
Implementation of “The National Program on Energy
Saving and Renewable Energy of the Republic of
Armenia (2007)”: Increase in energy production
based on renewable energy sources;
NAMA
Program
Project
Program
Program
Elaborate and carry out an action plan on the
development of renewable energy such as microMeasures
hydraulic, photovoltaic and biomass power generation
for decentralized electrification
Electricity Generation from Renewable Energy for Offgrid Use and Direct Use of Renewable Energy Projects
Measures
to install: 150,000 solar home systems; construct
65,000 small hydro electric power generation
facilities; 300 wind pumps; 300 solar pumps; 3,000 in
Measures
Development of new energies: construction of
hydroelectric dams and solar panel
Retrofit existing hydro dams and construction more
hydro dams
Promote electricity generation from renewable energy
Measures
sources (share of renewable energy: 10-20% by
2020)
Support waste-to-energy initiatives (sawdust, oil palm
Measures
waste and other agricultural waste / residue)
Renewable /New
Ethiopia
energy
Renewable /New
Gabon
energy
Renewable /New
Ghana
energy
Renewable /New
Ghana
energy
Renewable /New
Ghana
energy
E-97 Energy
E-98 Energy
E-99 Energy
E-100 Energy
E-101 Energy
E-102 Energy
Measures
Program
Program
Project
Renewable /New
Cote d'Ivoire
energy
Measures
Energy production through rehabilitation of
hydroelectric dams of Djoué and Moukoukoulou
Renewable /New Republic of
energy
Congo
Program
E-96 Energy
Measures
Project
Project
Project
Program
Program
Sub-category
Enhancement of the hydroelectric potential
Measures
Measures
Measures
Measures
Measures
Category
Renewable /New Republic of
energy
Congo
Implementation of a new Energy/Industry program
Renewable /New Central African on rural habitats aiming for the construction of
energy
Republic
ecological villages integrating energy efficiency and
renewable energy
Renewable /New Central African Rehabilitation of hydroelectric dams in Bouali I, II and
energy
Republic
III
Installation of micro-hydroelectric plants of 4MW and
Renewable /New Central African a total of 35 MW until 2030 on the various waterfalls
energy
Republic
of the country: Toutoubou, Baidou, Nakombo-Soso,
Kembé and la-Mbi.
Renewable /New Central African Development of a wind farm of 4000 MW : 1000 MW
energy
Republic
in 2012 with a strong mitigation potential
Renewable /New
Armenia
energy
Sub-sector
E-95 Energy
E-94 Energy
E-93 Energy
E-92 Energy
E-91 Energy
E-90 Energy
No.
NAMA Matrix of Other Parties
National
National
National
National
National
National
Local
National
National
Local
Local
Local
National
Boundary
Reference
Scenario
NAMA
Target
Condition
Measures
Measures
Measures
Measures
Valuation of household waste (solid and liquid) of
large cities in Madagascar through the production of
fertilizers and energy (biogas, electricity)
Control of conventional energy source in Mauritania:
rationalize the use of conventional energy sources
(biomass)
Promotion of renewable energy: focus research on
the techniques for efficient production and use of
renewable energy
Increase newable energy up to 33% of total energy
consumption by 2020
Installation of large scale PV systems in the Gobi
region
Installation of small, portable wind generation
systems to supply electricity to nomadic herders and
farmers in rural areas
Renewable /New
Madagascar
energy
Renewable /New
Madagascar
energy
Renewable /New
Mauritania
energy
Renewable /New
Mauritania
energy
Renewable /New
Peru
energy
Renewable /New
Mongolia
energy
Renewable /New
Mongolia
energy
E-107 Energy
E-108 Energy
E-109 Energy
E-110 Energy
E-111 Energy
E-112 Energy
E-113 Energy
E-114 Energy
E-116 Energy
Promote and develop renewable energy sources
Continue development of hydropower plants
Installation of hydroelectric power plants for the large
Measures
cities
Measures
Elaborate and carry out an action plan on the
development of renewable energy (micro hydraulic,
photovoltaic and biomass power generation for
decentralized electrification)
Renewable /New
Madagascar
energy
Renewable /New
Mongolia
energy
Renewable /New
San Marino
energy
Program
Measures
Use of methane emitted from livestock and chicken
farming production and slaughter houses
Renewable /New
Jordan
energy
E-106 Energy
E-115 Energy
Program
Measures
Biogas to become part of the sources for Jordanian
electricity system
Renewable /New
Jordan
energy
Measures
Measures
Measures
Measures
National
Boundary
Program
Program
Program
Program
Policy
Program
Program
Program
Program
Program
National
National
National
National
National
National
National
National
National
National
National
National
Law/
National
regulation
E-105 Energy
Measures
Program
Sub-category
Enhancement of renewable energy law (wind, solar,
etc.)
Measures
Category
Renewable /New
Jordan
energy
NAMA
E-104 Energy
Party
Capture and utilize methane gas from landfill sites
Sub-sector
Renewable /New
Ghana
energy
Sector
E-103 Energy
No.
NAMA Matrix of Other Parties
Reference
Scenario
NAMA
Target
Condition
Program
Project
Project
Program
Program
Promote solar energy, wind energy, and biogas
Introduce concentrated solar power (CSP), PV at
building, wind energy, and biomass energy
Install micro hydroelectric unit capacity of 3 MW and
total 300 MW, launching in 2009, 100 plants by 2030, Measures
potential mitigation: 715 kt CO2 per year
Measures
Introduce biomass energy using waste biomass
Focus research on solar and wind energy, biogas and
Measures
biofuels
Measures
Develop renewable energies (small-hydro, wind,
biomass, and PV)
Install hydroelectric power stations of 40 MW
(tanafnit, El Borj) launch in 2009-running 2013,
potential mitigation: 171 kt CO2 per year
Develop solar energy to power 2,000 MW in 5 sites,
start operation in years 2015-2020, potential
mitigation: 3,700 kt CO2 per year.
Promote solar energy, 40,000 m2 and 440,000 m2 by
Measures
2012 with water heater, 1,700,000 m2 by 2020,
potential for mitigation: 232 KT CO2 per year.
Develop national wind farm (Energipro program),
1,000MW by 2012, 5,000MW by 2030; potential
mitigation: 9250 KT per year
Morocco Cement; wind energy park of 20 MW;
potential mitigation: 55 Kt CO2 per year.
Renewable /New
Macedonia
energy
Renewable /New
Macedonia
energy
Renewable /New
Togo
energy
Renewable /New
Tunisia
energy
Renewable /New
Togo
energy
Renewable /New
Morocco
energy
Renewable /New
Morocco
energy
Renewable /New
Morocco
energy
Renewable /New
Morocco
energy
Renewable /New
Morocco
energy
Renewable /New
Morocco
energy
E-120 Energy
E-121 Energy
E-122 Energy
E-123 Energy
E-124 Energy
E-125 Energy
E-126 Energy
E-127 Energy
E-128 Energy
E-129 Energy
E-130 Energy
Measures
Measures
Measures
Measures
Measures
Measures
Measures
Develop new large hydro power plants (HPP Boskov
Most, HPP Galiste, HPP Cebren)
Renewable /New
Macedonia
energy
E-119 Energy
Project
Project
Program
Program
Program
Program
Project
Program
Project
Sub-category
Develop waste to energy Programrams for urban and
Measures
agricultural wastes
Measures
Category
Renewable /New
Sierra Leone
energy
NAMA
E-118 Energy
Party
Expand clean energy utilization (solar, mini-hydro,
LPG, biomass stoves etc.)
Sub-sector
Renewable /New
Sierra Leone
energy
Sector
E-117 Energy
No.
NAMA Matrix of Other Parties
Local
National
National
Local
Local
Local
National
National
National
local
local
local
National
National
Boundary
Reference
Scenario
NAMA
Target
Condition
Renewable /New
Morocco
energy
Renewable /New
Chad
energy
Morocco
Jordan
Standard
Standard
Standard
Standard
Standard
Standard
Standard
Tariff
Tariff
Tariff
Tariff
Tariff
Tariff
Technological
innovation
E-133 Energy
E-134 Energy
E-135 Energy
E-136 Energy
E-137 Energy
E-138 Energy
E-139 Energy
E-140 Energy
E-141 Energy
E-142 Energy
E-143 Energy
E-144 Energy
E-145 Energy
E-146 Energy
E-147 Energy
E-148 Energy
Tunisia
Tunisia
Macedonia
Mongolia
Tunisia
Morocco
Morocco
Macedonia
Tunisia
Togo
Ghana
Mongolia
Renewable /New
Morocco
energy
Party
E-132 Energy
Sub-sector
Renewable /New
Morocco
energy
Sector
E-131 Energy
No.
Measures
Measures
Measures
Measures
Measures
Category
Measures
Measures
Measures
Measures
Introduction of metered tariff for heat use at
apartments
Introduce energy consumption meter and metered
tariff
Valorize energy price generated from solid and liquid
wastes (both electricity generation and biofuels)
Valorize energy price generated from methane gas
from controlled landfills and wastewater
Upgrade of the Jordan refinery to improve quality of
diesel and further emissions reduction
Measures
Measures
Measures
Valorize energy price from solar and wind energy for
water desalinization and pumping
Improve metered energy billing system
Measures
Measures
Measures
Measures
Measures
Oblige energy sellers save energy, for certification
Install equipment to measure/ regulate/ automatic
control systems
Introduce Ecolabelling of household appliances
(particularly refrigerators and air conditioners),
potential mitigation: 779 KT CO2 per year.
Certify electrical appliances at households
Control the use of conventional energy sources
Develop and enforce standards and labels for electric
Measures
appliances
Establish energy efficiency standard for buildings
Regional Office of agricultural value-Energia wind
park of 20 MW
Development of energy efficiency in industry by
association with focal development of renewable
energy; launch in 2009, potential mitigation: 581 kt
CO2 per year.
Lafarge Maroc Wind Energy: realize 10MW and
expand to 32MW by 201-2012
Promotion of renewable energy: development of
solar and wind energy, use of biogas energy and
biofuels
NAMA
NAMA Matrix of Other Parties
National
Local
National
Local
Boundary
National
National
National
National
National
local
Program
National
Law/
National
regulation
Law/
National
regulation
Law/
National
regulation
Law/
National
regulation
Program
Law/
National
regulation
Law/
National
regulation
Program
Program
Program
Program
Program
Law/
National
regulation
Program
Project
Project
Project
Sub-category
Reference
Scenario
NAMA
Target
Condition
Residential cooking: establish more woodlods
Residential cooking: promote the re-use of wood
residues
Improve efficiency of wood combustion for the
production of charcoal
Wood production
Ghana
and use
Wood production
Togo
and use
E-162 Energy
E-163 Energy
Measures
Measures
Measures
Measures
Wood production
Ghana
and use
E-159 Energy
Measures
E-161 Energy
Morocco
Technological
innovation
E-158 Energy
Install clean coal plants Jorf Lasfar and Safi
Sustainable production of charcoal and reduce
dependence on firewood
Morocco
Technological
innovation
E-157 Energy
Program
Program
Program
Program
Program
Project
Project
Program
Install combined cycle plants Ain Beni Mathar 870 MW
commissioned in 2010, potential mitigation: 4,038 Kt Measures
CO2 per year
Wood production
Sierra Leone
and use
Morocco
Technological
innovation
E-156 Energy
Program
Program
Program
Program
Program
Program
Program
Sub-category
Valuation of gas flare during petrol production stages Measures
Measures
E-160 Energy
Republic of
Congo
Technological
innovation
E-155 Energy
Recover and use petroleum associated gases
Measures
Measures
Tunisia
Technological
innovation
E-154 Energy
Improve heat insulation of tranport pipelines for
water, steam, fuels, etc.
Measures
Control of conventional energy source in Mauritania:
improve the efficiency of wood combustion for the
production of charcoal
Macedonia
Technological
innovation
E-153 Energy
Improve fluid transportation system
Measures
Wood production
Mauritania
and use
Macedonia
Technological
innovation
E-152 Energy
Use of flue gases
Measures
Measures
Category
Measures
Macedonia
Technological
innovation
E-151 Energy
Introduce the coal briquetting technology, coal
beneficiation
Modernization of thermal power plants;
NAMA
2x1,000 MW nuclear power plants planned for 20202030, potential mitigation: 14,968 Kt CO2 per year.
Mongolia
Technological
innovation
E-150 Energy
Party
Armenia
Sub-sector
Technological
innovation
Sector
E-149 Energy
No.
NAMA Matrix of Other Parties
National
National
National
National
National
National
Local
Local
National
National
National
National
National
National
National
Boundary
Reference
Scenario
NAMA
Target
Condition
Industry
Industry
Industry
Industry
Industry
Industry
Industry
I-2
I-3
I-4
I-5
I-6
I-7
I-8
I-9
I-10
Tunisia
Gabon
Ghana
Ghana
Armenia
Morocco
Technological
innovation
Technological
innovation
Technological
innovation
Technological
innovation
Technological
innovation
Industry
Industry
I-11 Industry
I-12 Industry
Macedonia
Standard
Standard
Energy efficiency Tunisia
Energy efficiency Ghana
Energy efficiency Ghana
Energy efficiency Macedonia
Ghana
CCS
Industry
Party
I-1
Sub-sector
Wood production
Chad
and use
Sector
E-164 Energy
No.
Program
Program
Program
Measures
Install biomass boiler in agro-industry, industry
sector, and houesholds
Improve power factor correction across industrial and
Measures
institute energy efficient measures in industrial
operations
Improve on resource efficiency in industries to
promote sustainable production and consumption
Phosphate purification system in 4 sites in OCP,
potential mitigation: 343 Kt CO2 per year
Decrease of loss in methane flow in gas
transportation and gas delivery systems
Measures
Measures
Project
Program
Program
Measures
Improvement of metal production (aluminum):
reduce carbon dioxide emissions from anode
reactions
Program
Program
Measures
Improvement of oil and gas production: promote zero
Measures
fugitive emissions
Banning of burning of gas flare and petroleum
Measures
Reinforce national program for environmental
upgrading of industrial companies
Local
National
National
National
National
National
Law/
National
regulation
Measures
Improve standards for building construction and
insulation and quality of materials used
Program
Program
National
National
National
National
National
National
Boundary
Develop energy efficiency program in industrial sector Measures
Measures
Program
Improvement of oil and gas production:assess,
promote and incorporate carbon capture and storage Measures
(CCS) in oil and gas production and utilization
Sub-category
Program
Category
Measures
Energy efficiency in urban and rural areas: rational
use of traditional energy sources such as biomass
NAMA
NAMA Matrix of Other Parties
Reference
Scenario
NAMA
Target
Condition
Sector
Transportation Biofuel
Transportation Biofuel
Transportation
T-8
Transportation
Transportation
Transportation
Transportation
Transportation
Transportation
Transportation
Transportation
Transportation
T-12
T-13
T-14
T-15
T-16
T-17
T-18
T-19
General policy
and measure
General policy
and measure
General policy
and measure
General policy
and measure
General policy
and measure
General policy
and measure
General policy
and measure
General policy
and measure
General policy
and measure
Financial
measure
General policy
Transportation
and measure
General policy
Transportation
and measure
T-11
T-10
T-9
Transportation Biofuel
Transportation Biofuel
T-2
T-3
T-4
T-5
T-6
T-7
Transportation Biofuel
Transportation Biofuel
Transportation Biofuel
Technological
innovation
Technological
innovation
Technological
innovation
Technological
innovation
Technological
innovation
Sub-sector
T-1
I-17 Industry
I-16 Industry
I-15 Industry
I-14 Industry
I-13 Industry
No.
Tunisia
Tunisia
Macedonia
Macedonia
Macedonia
Macedonia
Macedonia
Macedonia
Ghana
Gabon
Tunisia
Mongolia
Madagascar
Sierra Leone
Macedonia
Macedonia
Togo
Chad
Ghana
Tunisia
Macedonia
Macedonia
Mongolia
Mongolia
Party
Category
Establish engine diagnostic plants in transport sector
Create logistic center
Introduce electric toll collection system
Synchronize road signals in urban areas
Improve traffic control and organization
Improve traffic planning
Promote use of hybrid vehicles
Modernize vehicle fleet
Vehicle technology: promote the use of Euro III and
above as well as use Flexi Vehicles;
Measures
Measures
Measures
Measures
Measures
Measures
Measures
Measures
Measures
Program
Program
Program
Program
Program
Program
Program
Program
Program
Program
Promotion of clean transport: import and sale of used
Measures
vehicles less than 5-years old
Program
Program
Program
Program
Program
Program
Law/
regulation
Program
Program
Program
Program
Project
Program
Measures
Measures
Measures
Measures
Measures
Measures
Measures
Measures
Measures
Measures
Measures
Measures
Program
Sub-category
Measures
Develop energy efficiency program in tranport sector
Introduce vehicle registration tax
Promote the production and use of bio-fuels as
transport fuel
Promote the exploitation and use of biofuels
Develop biofuels from sugarcane, corn, rice husk etc
Promote use of biodiesel
Introduce biofuels
Promote biofuels
Promoting the exploitation and use of biofuels
Reduce N2O emissions from phosphate industry
Improve performace of thermal cycle
Introduce up-to-date technologies and processes
Introduce dry-processing in cement industry
Motor efficiency improvement through, energyefficient motors; variable speed drives; improved
Measures
operation and maintenance; correction of previous
over-sizing; improved mechanical power transmission,
efficiency of driven equipment
NAMA
NAMA Matrix of Other Parties
National
National
National
Local
National
National
National
National
National
National
National
National
National
National
National
National
National
National
National
National
National
National
local
National
Boundary
Reference
Scenario
NAMA
Target
Condition
Transportation
Transportation
T-21
T-22
Transportation Public transport
Transportation Public transport
Transportation Public transport
Transportation Public transport
Transportation Public transport
T-29
T-30
T-31
T-32
T-33
T-34
T-35
T-36
T-37
Transportatio
Public transport
n
Transportatio
Public transport
n
Transportation Public transport
Transportation Public transport
Transportation Public transport
T-28
Public
information
Transportation
T-27
T-26
T-25
T-24
Transportation
Macedonia
Macedonia
Togo
Tunisia
Tunisia
Tunisia
Sierra Leone
Ethiopia
Benin
Mauritania
Cote d'Ivoire
Tunisia
Macedonia
Armenia
Project
Program
Measures
Development of public transport in Cotonou city and
its agglomeration in order to reduce GHG emissions
Railway Projects with Trains to Run with Electricity
Generated from Renewable Energy:
Route 1 :(Addis Ababa-Modjo-Awash, 656 Km);
Measures
Route 2 :(Modjo-Shashemene-Awassa–Konso–Woyito
– including Konso–Moyale, 903 km),
Route 3: (Addis Ababa–Ejaji–Jimma–Guraferda)
Improve the use of mass transport (eg. Road and
water) for passengers and cargo
Measures
Measures
Measures
Measures
Measures
Measures
Program
Program
Program
Program
Program
Program
Project
Energy efficiency in urban and rural settings reduction of energy consumption: promotion of public Measures
transport
Modernize public transport
Introduce electric tramway
Improve public transport
Introduce and promote subway
Introduce and promote train
Introduce and promote bus in dedicated lanes
Program
Measures
Conduct awareness-raising campaigns to encourage
the transport and industrial sectors to adopt clean
means of production and consumption
Measures
Program
Measures
Program
Program
Promote CNG in transport sector
Measures
Program
Increase of the natural gas share in motor transports
Measures
fuel
Promote use of LPG, CNG
Program
Measures
Expansion of electrical transport
Program
Vehicle technology: institute measures to promote
and switch from the use of gasoline and diesel fuels Measures
to use of CNG, LPG and electricity for public transport
Natural gas use/
Ghana
fuel switch
Armenia
Program
Measures
Program
Sub-category
Fuel use: substitute the use of gasoline with CNG,
LPG and electricity for public transport
Category
Natural gas use/
Ghana
fuel switch
NAMA
Promotion of clean transport: development of quality
Measures
public transportation with natural gas vehicle (bus)
Party
Natural gas use/
Gabon
fuel switch
Sub-sector
Natural gas use/
fuel switch
Natural gas use/
Transportation
fuel switch
Natural gas use/
Transportation
fuel switch
Natural gas use/
Transportation
fuel switch
Transportation
T-20
T-23
Sector
No.
NAMA Matrix of Other Parties
National
National
National
National
National
National
National
Local
Local
National
National
National
National
National
National
National
National
National
Boundary
Reference
Scenario
NAMA
Target
Condition
Transportation Standard
Transportation Standard
Transportation Standard
Transportation Standard
T-46
T-47
T-48
T-49
Transportation
Transportation Standard
T-45
T-52
Transportation Standard
T-44
Transportation
Transportation Standard
T-43
T-51
Transportation Standard
T-42
Republic of
Congo
Ghana
Transportation
infrastructure
Measures
Category
Local
Program
Infrastructure / modes: expand road, and developed
infrastructure for and promote rail, maritime, air and
inland water transportation systems
Program
National
National
National
Law/
National
regulation
Law/
National
regulation
Law/
National
regulation
Law/
National
regulation
Program
Law/
National
regulation
Project
Measures
National
Local
Local
National
National
Boundary
Law/
National
regulation
Program
Program
Project
Program
Program
Sub-category
Rehabilitation of transport infrastructure and electrical
Measures
energy and drinking water distribution
Measures
Measures
Measures
Measures
Regulate transport fuel quality in accordance with EU
Measures
norms
Measures
Measures
Develop and enforce regulations on regular
maintenance of vehicles
Regulate traffic in central urban areas
Measures
Measures
Introduce import standards for import vehicles
Fuel use: enforced road worthiness certification
requirements
Services: develop and improve facilities for public
Measures
transport system
Urban transport development: Regional Express
Casablanca in 2009-2014; potential mitigation: 880 Kt Measures
CO2 per year
Tramway service in Rabat 2010; potential mitigation:
Measures
119 kt CO2 per year.
Service; incentive the use of public transport and
promote car pooling
NAMA
Central African
Control of emissions from motor vehicles
Republic
Republic of
Control of vehicle emissions
Congo
Strengthening technical inspections of vehicles in the
Morocco
technical centers 2008-2012; potential mitigation: 54
Kt CO2 per year
Jordan armed forces and air force environment
strategy and action plans: including the upgrade of
Jordan
engines and old vehicles; by developing environment
best practices and energy saving technologies in there
facilities and bases
Macedonia
Macedonia
Sierra Leone
Mongolia
Ghana
Morocco
Morocco
Ghana
Ghana
Party
Transportation
infrastructure
Technological
innovation
Transportation Public transport
T-41
Transportation
Transportation Public transport
T-40
T-50
Transportation Public transport
T-39
Sub-sector
Transportation Public transport
Sector
T-38
No.
NAMA Matrix of Other Parties
Reference
Scenario
NAMA
Target
Condition
Ghana
Transportation
infrastructure
Transportation
infrastructure
Transportation
Transportation
T-55
T-56
T-57
T-59
T-58
Jordan
Transportation
Transportation
infrastructure
Transportation
infrastructure
Transportation
Transportation
infrastructure
Transportation
Tunisia
Tunisia
Madagascar
Ghana
Transportation
infrastructure
Transportation
T-54
Ghana
Transportation
infrastructure
Transportation
Party
T-53
Sub-sector
Sector
No.
Measures
Measures
Category
Develop transport of trucks by railways
Develop urban transport plans in main cities
Measures
Measures
Introduce and develop less polluting means of
transport: intermediate means of transport, railed
Measures
urban public transport, improvement of transport
vectors
Aqaba port project: by moving the port south to the
Saudi border, thus cutting back significantly the
Measures
distance for the ships to travel in Jordan water and
congestion in the city of Aqaba
Fuel use: retrofit existing refinery infrastructure and
ensure that new refinery produce non-metallic based Measures
gasoline
Infrastructure / modes: expand infrastructure for
non-motorized transport
Infrastructure / modes: improve road conditions by
increasing the percent of paved road
NAMA
NAMA Matrix of Other Parties
Program
Program
Program
Project
Program
Program
Program
Sub-category
National
National
National
Local
National
National
National
Boundary
Reference
Scenario
NAMA
Target
Condition
M-2 cutting
M-1 cutting
Colombia
Eritrea
Chad
Transportation
infrastructure
General policy
and measure
Transportation
T-71
Morocco
Transportation
infrastructure
Misc./cross-
Transportation
T-70
Morocco
Transportation
infrastructure
General policy
and measure
Transportation
T-69
Morocco
Tunisia
Macedonia
Macedonia
Transportation
infrastructure
Misc./cross-
Transportation
T-68
T-67
T-66
T-65
Transportation
Macedonia
Jordan
Transportation
infrastructure
Transportation
T-63
Transportation
infrastructure
Transportation
Transportation
infrastructure
Transportation
Transportation
infrastructure
Transportation
Transportation
infrastructure
Jordan
Transportation
infrastructure
Transportation
T-62
T-64
Jordan
Transportation
infrastructure
Transportation
T-61
Party
Jordan
Sub-sector
T-60
Sector
Transportation
Transportation
infrastructure
No.
Measures
Remodeling of vehicle transport by trucks and taxis
by introducing new vehicles in the year 2008-2012;
potential mitigation: 501 kt CO2 per year
Measures
Formulate, implement, publish and regularly update
national and, where appropriate, regional programs
containing measures to mitigate climate change
Take advantage of existing flexibility mechanisms,
particularly the Clean Development Mechanism CDM,
Measures
for which Colombia has a portfolio of projects that
have an estimated annual reduction potential of 17.4
million tonnes of CO2.
Measures
Development of less polluting transport modes
Promotion of rail development for the TGV routes and
Measures
electrification of Casablanca Tanger-Fes - Oujda
Implementation of plans for urban and long distance
displacement, ensuring consistency with the planning Measures
of land use
Measures
Measures
Measures
Measures
Measures
Measures
Measures
Measures
Category
Develop multi-modal transport
Extend electrification of the railway network
Improve maintenance of road and railways
Revitalize of road and railways
city on an 80m new ring road to create a new
corridor which aims to reduce congestion of trucks
and pollution
Modernize the freight transport fleet operating in
Jordan: stop importing old trucks and transform
gradually into a modern efficient fleet
Jordan railway project: start design and feasibility
study
Amman-Zarqa light rail project: to improve urban
transport standards in greater Amman-Zarqa
metropolitan area; reduce pollution and cut back
vehicles emission; by introducing an environmentally
friendly
transport
Build and
develop system
the Amman dry port south of the
NAMA
NAMA Matrix of Other Parties
Policy
Program
Program
Program
Project
Program
Program
Program
Program
Program
Program
Project
Project
Project
Sub-category
National
National
National
National
Local
National
National
National
National
National
National
Local
Local
National
Boundary
Reference
Scenario
NAMA
Target
Condition
Misc./crosscutting
M-3
M-11 cutting
Misc./cross-
M-10 cutting
Misc./cross-
M-9 cutting
Misc./cross-
M-8 cutting
Misc./cross-
M-7 cutting
Misc./cross-
M-6 cutting
Misc./cross-
M-5 cutting
Misc./cross-
M-4 cutting
Misc./cross-
Sector
No.
Study
Study
Study
Study
Study
Study
Study
Study
Public
information
Sub-sector
Eritrea
Eritrea
Eritrea
Eritrea
Eritrea
Republic of
Congo
Republic of
Congo
Republic of
Congo
Eritrea
Party
Category
Develop data archives related to the climate system
and intended to further the understanding and to
contribute to reduction of the remaining uncertainties
Measures
regarding the cause, effects, magnitude and timing of
climate change and the economic and social
consequences of various response strategies
Promote and cooperate in the exchange of relevant
scientific, technological, socio-economic, and legal
information related to the climate system and climate Measures
change, and to the economic and social
consequences of various response strategies
Program
Program
Program
Promote and cooperate in scientific, technological,
socio-economic and other research, systematic
observation related to the climate system
Measures
Policy
Mainstream climate change considerations in Eritrea's
relevant social, economic and environmental policies Measures
and actions to mitigate or adapt to climate change
Project
Project
Project
Program
Measures
Measures
Measures
Program
Sub-category
Research, develop, demonstrate, apply, diffuse and
transfer of technologies, practices and processes that
control, reduce or prevent anthropogenic emissions of Measures
greenhouse gases not controlled by the Montreal
Protocol in the energy, transport, industry, agiculture
Installation of a relay station for the reception of
satellite imagery
Installation of a control station on atmospheric
pollution, water and soil quality
Creation of a national observatory on the
environment
Promote and cooperate in education, training and
public awareness related to climate and encourage
Measures
the wildest participation in this process, including that
of non-governmental organizations
NAMA
NAMA Matrix of Other Parties
National
National
National
National
National
National
National
National
National
Boundary
Reference
Scenario
NAMA
Target
Condition
&RQGLWLRQ
&RQGLWLRQ
&
&
*HQHUDO
*HQHUDO
*HQHUDO
1$0$
&RQGLWLRQ
&
*HQHUDO
& &RQGLWLRQ
&RQGLWLRQ
&
*HQHUDO
1$0$
&RQGLWLRQ
&
*HQHUDO
& &RQGLWLRQ
&RQGLWLRQ
&
*HQHUDO
1$0$
&RQGLWLRQ
&
&UHDWLRQRIDQDWLRQDOREVHUYDWRU\RQWKHHQYLURQPHQW
&HQWUDO$IULFDQ
5HSXEOLF
*HRUJLD
*HRUJLD
Botswana
Botswana
*HRUJLD
&RWHG
,YRLUH
7RDFKLHYHD059DEOHGHYLDWLRQIURPWKHEDVHOLQHEHORZ%$8OHYHOVVXSSRUWHGDQGHQDEOHGE\WHFKQRORJ\
DQGFDSDFLW\EXLOGLQJ
7RHVWDEOLVK1$0$VLQWKHFRQWH[WRIVXVWDLQDEOHGHYHORSPHQWVXSSRUWHGDQGHQDEOHGE\WHFKQRORJ\DQG
FDSDFLW\EXLOGLQJLQD059DEOHPDQQHU
7RGHYHORSDORQJWHUPPLWLJDWLRQDQGDGDSWDWLRQVWUDWHJ\/70$6WRDVVHVVPLWLJDWLRQSRWHQWLDO
7RFRQGXFWDQDO\VLVRIPLWLJDWLRQRSWLRQV
7RGHYHORSDORZFDUERQJURZWKSODQDQGORZFDUERQVWUDWHJ\LQSDUWLFXODUWKURXJKWKHXVHRIUHQHZDEOH
HQHUJ\LQYHVWPHQWVDQGJOREDOFRRSHUDWLRQ
(ODERUDWHDQGFDUU\RXWDQDWLRQDOVWUDWHJ\WRUHGXFHWKHULVNVRIKD]DUGV
,PSOHPHQWDQHQYLURQPHQWDOVXUYHLOODQFHV\VWHPWRFRQWURODLUZDWHUDQGVRLOTXDOLW\
,QVWDOODWLRQRIDUHOD\VWDWLRQIRUWKHUHFHSWLRQRIVDWHOOLWHLPDJHU\
&HQWUDO$IULFDQ
5HSXEOLF
&RWHG
,YRLUH
&RPSOHWLRQRIQDWLRQDO*+*LQYHQWRU\
3UHSDUDWLRQRIWKH,QLWLDO1DWLRQDO&RPPXQLFDWLRQ,1&LQFOXGLQJVSHFLILFPLWLJDWLRQVWUDWHJLHVDQGDFWLYLWLHV
DSSURSULDWHIRUWKHQDWLRQDOFRQWH[W
7RHVWDEOLVKEDVHOLQHRUUHIHUHQFHFDVHDJDLQVWZKLFKWKHDFWLRQEHPHDVXUHGUHSRUWHGYHULILHG
7RHVWDEOLVKWKHEDVHOLQHWKURXJKFDSDFLW\EXLOGLQJDFWLYLWLHV
1$0$
$IJKDQLVWDQ
$IJKDQLVWDQ
*HRUJLD
%DVHOLQHUHIHUHQFH
VFHQDULR
& &RQGLWLRQ
&RQGLWLRQ
&
Botswana
3DUW\
%DVHOLQHUHIHUHQFH
VFHQDULR
1$0$
&RQGLWLRQ
&
6XEVHFWRU
& &RQGLWLRQ
&DWHJRU\
1R
&DWHJRU\
&DUERQ
QHXWUDO
&DUERQ
QHXWUDO
&DUERQ
1HXWUDO
&DUERQ
1HXWUDO
1R
1
1
1
1
6XEVHFWRU
3DSXD1HZ
*XLQHD
0DOGLYHV
&RVWD5LFD
%KXWDQ
3DUW\
$FKLHYHFDUERQQHXWUDOLW\DVDFRXQWU\E\
$FKLHYHFDUERQQHXWUDOLW\DVDFRXQWU\E\
7RDFKLHYHFDUERQQHXWUDOWUDQVSRUWHQHUJ\IRUHVWU\ZDVWHPDQDJHPHQWHVWLPDWLRQDQGLQFUHPHQWDO
FRVWVIRULPSOHPHQWDWLRQFXUUHQWO\XQGHUZD\
7RUHPDLQFDUERQQHXWUDO
EHLQJSXUVXDQWWR³WKH'HFODUDWLRQRIWKH.LQJGRPRI%KXWDQ±/DQGRI*URVV+DSSLQHVVWRVDYHRXU3ODQHW´
1$0$
$OO
$OO
$OO
$OO
7DUJHW
7DUJHW
7DUJHW
7DUJHW
7DUJHW
7DUJHW
7DUJHW
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7 7DUJHW
7 7DUJHW
7 7DUJHW
$OO
$OO
$OO
$OO
$OO
$OO
$OO
7DUJHW
7
$OO
6XE
VHFWRU
7DUJHW
6HFWRU
7
1R
$FKLHYH1$0$WDUJHW
$FKLHYH1$0$WDUJHW
8SWRE\
$EVROXWHWDUJHW
1ROHVVWKDQ
$EVROXWHWDUJHW
$FKLHYH1$0$WDUJHW
$FKLHYH1$0$WDUJHW
$FKLHYH1$0$WDUJHW
5HGXFWLRQRIE\UHIHUHQFH%$8PDLQDFWLRQVIRUDFKLHYLQJ
UHGXFWLRQWDUJHWLQFOXGHUHQHZDEOHHQHUJ\IRUHOHFWULFLW\JHQHUDWLRQ
E\DQGUHGXFWLRQRIHOHFWULFLW\FRQVXPSWLRQE\
RIGHIRUHVWDWLRQDQGODQGGHJUDGDWLRQGHYHORSPHQWRIFDUERQVHTXHVWUDWLRQ
SURMHFWVLQIRUHVWU\DQGDJULFXOWXUHUHGXFWLRQLQVROLGDQGOLTXLGZDVWH
$FKLHYH1$0$WDUJHW
WKURXJKSURPRWLRQRIHQHUJ\HIILFLHQF\GHYHORSPHQWDQGDOWHUQDWLYH
DQGUHQHZDEOHHQHUJ\VRXUFHVDQGVKLIWLQJWRORZHPLVVLRQ
WUDQVSRUWDWLRQPRGH DQGVXVWDLQDEOHSHDWODQGPDQDJHPHQWUHGXFWLRQLQUDWH
$FKLHYH1$0$WDUJHW
PDLQO\VXFKVHFWRUVDVHQHUJ\HIILFLHQF\UHQHZDEOHHQHUJ\ODQGXVH
FKDQJHDQGIRUHVWU\
GHIRUHVWDWLRQUHVWRUDWLRQRIJUD]LQJODQGLQWHJUDWHGFURSOLYHVWRFNV\VWHPQRWLOO
IDUPLQJELRORJLFDO1IL[DWLRQ
$EVROXWHWDUJHW
$EVROXWHWDUJHW
E\$EVROXWH
WDUJHW
E\$EVROXWH
WDUJHW
E\$EVROXWH
WDUJHW
WR
$EVROXWHWDUJHW
$EVROXWHWDUJHW
,QWHQVLW\7DUJHW
3HUXQLWRI*'3
$FKLHYH1$0$WDUJHW
WKURXJK3XUVXLQJORZFDUERQJUHHQJURZWKGHYHORSPHQWVWUDWHJ\
DQG'HYHORSPHQWDQGLPSOHPHQWDWLRQRIQDWLRQDOO\
DSSURSULDWHDGDSWDWLRQSODQVSURJUDPVDQGSURMHFWVDQGFDSDFLW\
EXLOGLQJFRPPXQLFDWLRQWKURXJKQDWLRQDOFRPPXQLFDWLRQ
$FKLHYH1$0$WDUJHW
WKURXJKHQHUJ\HIILFLHQF\LQFUHDVHWKHXVHRIELRIXHOVLQFUHDVHXQ
HQHUJ\VXSSO\E\K\GURHOHFWULFSRZHUSODQWVDOWHUQDWLYHHQHUJ\VRXUFHV
DQGLPSURYHPHQWRILURQVWHHOPDQXIDFWXUHDSSOLFDWLRQRIFRDOIURP
SODQWHGIRUHVWV DQGUHGXFWLRQLQDPD]RQGHIRUHVWDWLRQUHGXFWLRQLQ&HUUDGR
$FKLHYH1$0$WDUJHW
,QWHQVLW\7DUJHW
3HUXQLWRI*'3
1$0$
$FKLHYH1$0$WDUJHW
WKURXJKLQFUHDVLQJWKHVKDUHRIQRQIRVVLOIXHOVLQSULPDU\HQHUJ\
FRQVXPSWLRQWRDURXQGE\
1$0$7DUJHWE\
3DSXD1HZ $WOHDVWE\
*XLQHD
$EVROXWHWDUJHW
0ROGRYD
0H[LFR
0DUVKDOO,VODQGV
.RUHD
,VUDHO
,QGRQHVLD
&KLOH
%UD]LO
$QWLJXD%DUEXGD
,QGLD
&KLQD
3DUW\
3URYLVLRQRIDGHTXDWHILQDQFLDODQG
3XUVXDQWWRWKH1DWLRQDOHQHUJ\
3ROLF\DQG(QHUJ\$FWLRQ3ODQ
H[FOXGLQJWKHHPLVVLRQVIURP
DJULFXOWXUDOVHFWRU
&RQGLWLRQ
1$
,QWHULP1DWXUHRIWKH&RSHQKDJHQ$FFRUG
1HHGIRU/HJDOO\%LQGLQJ7UHDW\'HOLYHU\RQ
3OHGJHVDQG3RWHQWLDO(QDEOLQJ&OLPDWH
&RPSDWLEOH'HYHORSPHQW3HULRGLF5HYLHZ
DQG 8SGDWH
FRXQWULHV
%$8 WHFKQRORJLFDOVXSSRUWIURPGHYHORSHG
%$8
%$8
%$8
%$8
%$8
5HIHUHQFH
6FHQDULR
$OO
$OO
7 7DUJHW
7 7DUJHW
$EVROXWHWDUJHW
E\E\
6RXWK$IULFD
$EVROXWHWDUJHW
6LQJDSRUH
$FKLHYH1$0$WDUJHW
$FKLHYH1$0$WDUJHW
$OOFRXQWULHVLPSOHPHQWWKHLU
FRPPLWPHQWV
3URYLVLRQRIILQDQFLDOUHVRXUFHVWKH
WUDQVIHURIWHFKQRORJ\DQGFDSDFLW\
%$8
EXLOGLQJVXSSRUWE\GHYHORSHG
FRXQWULHV
%$8
ῧ௜㈨ᩱ㸴 NAMA ࣟࣥࢢࣜࢫࢺ࡜ศᯒ⤖ᯝ
Energy
Energy
Energy
Energy
Energy
Subsector
Implementing entity is
willing to be a NAMA
implementing entity
according to the
interview.
The mitigation action has
not started yet. According
to the project schedule,
construction is planned to
start in 2015 and
operation and emission
reduction will start in
2020
* Shaded cells indicate the NAMA candidate fulfills a screening criteria.
Pre FS including general
design is completed. Enough
information is available in
order to analyze how the
action contributes to GHG
emission reduction, how to
calculate the reduction
amount, and what the BAU
scenario is.
Implementing entity is
willing to be a NAMA
implementing entity
according to the
interview.
Scope and contents of the
mitigation action is clearly
defined including the
location and type of
activities.
Construction is planned
for 2012, while operation
starts for 2014, that will
be the year for start of
emissions reduction.
Implementing entity is
willing to be a NAMA
implementing entity
according to the
interview.
Implementing entity is
willing to be a NAMA
implementing entity
according to the
interview.
Implementing entity is
willing to be a NAMA
implementing entity
according to the
interview.
Voluntary participation
The activity has not
applied to CDM or any
other type of carbon
Replacement and
market scheme yet. The
Construction of a
activity needs to be
4 New Natural Gas
monitored to ensure
Cogeneration Plant
implementing entity does
CHP Novi Sad
not apply to CDM or any
other carbon scheme in
the future.
The activity has not
Scope and contents of the Pre FS including general
mitigation action is clearly design is completed. Enough applied to CDM or any
information is available in
other type of carbon
defined including the
order to analyze how the
market scheme yet. The
location and type of
action
contributes
to
GHG
activity needs to be
activities.
emission reduction, how to
monitored to ensure
Construction of a
calculate the reduction
implementing entity does
5 Super-critical
amount, and what the BAU
not apply to CDM or any
Lignite Power Plant
scenario is.
other carbon scheme in
the future.
The mitigation action has
not started yet. According
to the project schedule,
modernization is planned
in 2013, and emission
reduction will start in
2013.
The mitigation action has
not started yet. According
to the project schedule,
construction is planned to
start in 2013, and
operation and emission
reduction will start in
2017.
Timeline
1st Screening
The mitigation action has
not started yet. According
to the project schedule,
modernization is planned
in 2013, and emission
reduction will start in
2013.
The activity has not
applied to CDM or any
other type of carbon
market scheme yet. The
activity needs to be
monitored to ensure
Implementing entity does
not apply to CDM or any
other carbon scheme in
the future .
The activity has not
applied to CDM or any
other type of carbon
market scheme yet. The
activity needs to be
monitored to ensure
implementing entity does
not apply to CDM or any
other carbon scheme in
the future.
No double-counting
Basic Condition
The activity has not
applied to CDM or any
other type of carbon
market scheme yet. The
activity needs to be
monitored to ensure
implementing entity does
not apply to CDM or any
other carbon scheme in
the future .
Feasibility Study with Idea
Design for the project is
under development.
However, enough
information is available in
order to analyze how the
action contributes to GHG
emission reduction, how to
calculate the reduction
amount, and what the BAU
scenario is.
Scope and contents of the
mitigation action is clearly
defined including the
Modernization and location and type of
Capacity and
activities.
Efficiency Increase
3
of Unit A3 in
Thermal Power
Plant Nikola Tesla
Pre FS including general
design is completed. Enough
information is available in
order to analyze how the
action contributes to GHG
emission reduction, how to
calculate the reduction
amount, and what the BAU
scenario is.
Information
availability
Feasibility Study with Idea
Design for the project is
under development.
However, enough
information is available in
order to analyze how the
action contributes to GHG
emission reduction, how to
calculate the reduction
amount, and what the BAU
scenario is.
Scope and contents of the
mitigation action is clearly
defined including the
location and type of
activities.
Distinctiveness
Scope and contents of the
mitigation action is clearly
defined including the
Modernization and
location and type of
Capacity and
activities.
Efficiency Increase
2
of Unit B2 in
Thermal Power
Plant Nikola Tesla
Construction of a
790 MW Ultra
Supercritical
1
Lignite Power Plant
TPP Nikola Tesla Unit B3
No.
NAMA Title/
Measure to be
Introduced
Republic of Serbia NAMA Long List Evaluation
Regulation on establishing the
program for realizing the power
supply development strategy for
the Republic of Serbia up to year
2015 for the period from 2007 to
2012, Official Gazette of the
Republic of Serbia No. 11/2007,
11/2007, 99/2009 and 27/2010.
Activity is in line with Energy
strategy and INC.
Modernization is in line with
“Energy Sector Development
Strategy of the Republic of Serbia
by 2015”
Modernization is in line with
“Energy Development Strategy of
the Republic of Serbia by 2015”
Priority directions of the energy
sector development in the “Energy
Strategy Development Strategy of
the Republic of Serbia by 2015”
include construction of a new
lignite fueled thermal power plant
(700MWe / 4800GWh) in 2011/
2012.
Compliance
GHG emissions reduction will be
achieved through construction of
high-efficient power plant using
super critical steam power
generation technology, which will
reduce GHG that would be emitted
by the conventional less-efficient
lignite power plants. However,
emissions associated with the
reduced amount of electricity
generation at the thermal power
plant needs to be further analyzed.
GHG emissions reduction will be
achieved through installation of
high-efficient CCGT heat and power
generation plant
Reduction of GHGs will be achieved
by increasing energy efficiency of
the existing lignite-fired power
plant.
Reduction of GHGs will be achieved
by increasing energy efficiency of
the existing lignite-fired power
plant.
By increasing energy efficiency of
the lignite power plant, new power
plant will emit less GHGs than that
from the conventional inefficient
lignite power plants.
GHG reduction potential
General
3
3
3
3
3
Screening
Result
of
1st
1
All 1st screening criteria are
satisfied.
All 1st screening criteria are
satisfied.
All 1st screening criteria are
satisfied.
All 1st screening criteria are
satisfied.
All 1st screening criteria are
satisfied.
Remarks on
1st Screening Analysis
Ministry of Energy, Development and Environmental Protection
Japan International Cooperation Agency
Energy
Energy
Although information on
how mitigation action will
reduce GHG is available,
basic information that can
be used to analyze how
emission reduction can be
calculated, and what BAU
is are not available.
* Shaded cells indicate the NAMA candidate fulfills a screening criteria.
Although the mitigation
action is developed into a
specific project, detailed
scope and content of the
Landfill gas capture action is not defined,
including the current and
and electricity
expected condition/
10 generation in
treatment method of the
Landfill Vinþa
municipal solid waste,
(Belgrade)
amount of electricity
generated from the
waste.
The activity has not
applied to CDM or any
other type of carbon
market scheme yet. The
activity needs to be
monitored to ensure
implementing entity does
not apply to CDM or any
other carbon scheme in
the future .
Evaluation could not be
conducted (taking into
account the assessment
results for the first two
criteria)
Mitigation action is not
There is a general lack of
developed into specific
data and information
project activity. There is a necessary for assessment
Collection and
lack of information on
of mitigation potential.
9 utilization of landfill project's overall
gas
characteristics.
Biogas production
8 from agricultural
waste
Evaluation could not be
conducted (taking into
account the assessment
results for the first two
criteria)
Energy
The activity has not
applied to CDM or any
other type of carbon
market scheme yet. The
activity needs to be
monitored to ensure
implementing entity does
not apply to CDM or any
other carbon scheme in
the future.
Enough information is
available in order to
analyze how the action
contributes to GHG
emission reduction, how
to calculate the reduction
amount, and what the
BAU scenario is.
Scope and contents of the
mitigation action is clearly
defined including the
location and type of
activities.
No double-counting
Evaluation could not be
conducted (taking into
account the assessment
results for the first two
criteria)
Information
availability
Mitigation action is not
There is a general lack of
developed into specific
data and information
project activity. There is a necessary for assessment
lack of information on
of mitigation potential.
project's overall
characteristics.
Distinctiveness
Basic Condition
Mitigation action is not
There is a general lack of
developed into specific
data and information
project activity. There is a necessary for assessment
lack of information on
of mitigation potential.
project's overall
characteristics.
7
Construction of 9
New Small
Hydropower Plants
(HPPs) in Serbia
Introduction of
combined source
(electricity and
6
thermal) for
decentralized
source
No.
Energy
Energy
Subsector
NAMA Title/
Measure to be
Introduced
Republic of Serbia NAMA Long List Evaluation
The mitigation action has
not started yet. Project
schedule is yet to be
determined.
This mitigation action has
not been realized and will
not ensure emission
reduction by 2020
This mitigation action has
not been realized and will
not ensure emission
reduction by 2020
The mitigation action has
not started yet. According
to the project schedule,
construction is planned to
start in 2012 and
operation and emission
reduction will start in
2013 for Phase I.
This mitigation action has
not been realized and will
not ensure emission
reduction by 2020
Timeline
Implementing entity is
willing to be a NAMA
implementing entity
according to the
interview.
Evaluation could not be
conducted (taking into
account the assessment
results for the first two
criteria)
Evaluation could not be
conducted (taking into
account the assessment
results for the first two
criteria)
Implementing entity is
willing to be a NAMA
implementing entity
according to the
interview.
Evaluation could not be
conducted (taking into
account the assessment
results for the first two
criteria)
Voluntary participation
1st Screening
GHG emissions reduction will be
achieved through rehabilitation of
existing HPPs and construction of
new HPPs.
Although the detail of the action is
not identified, a potential action will
lead to the reduction of GHG
emission.
GHG reduction potential
Proposed mitigation action is in
line with The Strategy of Energy
Development in the Republic of
Serbia by 2015 (Official Gazette of
RS, no. 4405): use of renewable
energy and energy recovery.
Proposed mitigation action is in
line with The Strategy of Energy
Development in the Republic of
Serbia by 2015 (Official Gazette of
RS, no. 4405): use of renewable
energy and energy recovery.
Reduction of GHG will be achieved
by building a facility for landfill
capture and electricity generation,
which will displace the electricity
that would be generated from
other more carbon-intensive
sources. Methane emissions from
landfill site can also be avoided.
Although the detail of the action is
not identified, a potential action will
lead to the reduction of GHG
emission through collection and
utilization of landfill gas
The measure is in line with Initial GHG emission reduction will be
National Communication of Serbia. achieved through avoiding
methane emissions that would be
generated from abandoned
agricultural waste, as well as
through utilization of abandoned
biomass as a renewable fuel source
for energy generation.
Modernization is in line with
“Energy Sector Development
Strategy of the Republic of Serbia
by 2015” and INC.
Activity is in line with Energy
strategy and INC.
Compliance
General
3
Screening
Result
of
1st
2
The activity should be
continuously monitored
whether sufficient data and
information of the proposed
project is available.
The activity should be
continuously monitored
whether other real action/
projects are developed because
each local government is
currently using landfill to handle
municipal wastes.
The activity should be
continuously monitored
whether a real action/ project is
developed because Serbia has
abundant agricultural waste
throughout the country that can
be developed into biogas energy
projects.
All 1st screening criteria are
satisfied.
The action is not analyzed
any further because: There is
no concrete action planned in
line with the country's national
policy/ strategy and general
characteristic of the technology/
measure to be introduced is
unknown.
Remarks on
1st Screening Analysis
Ministry of Energy, Development and Environmental Protection
Japan International Cooperation Agency
Energy
Energy
Energy
Energy
Subsector
Evaluation could not be
conducted (taking into
account the assessment
results for the first two
criteria)
Evaluation could not be
conducted (taking into
account the assessment
results for the first two
criteria)
There is a general lack of
data and information
necessary for assessment
of mitigation potential.
* Shaded cells indicate the NAMA candidate fulfills a screening criteria.
distribution lines
Collect and utilize
of landfill gas: Nis
There is a general lack of
data and information
necessary for assessment
of mitigation potential.
12
Implementing entity is
willing to be a NAMA
implementing entity
according to the
interview.
Voluntary participation
This mitigation action has
not been realized and will
not ensure emission
reduction by 2020
This mitigation action has
not been realized and will
not ensure emission
reduction by 2020
Evaluation could not be
conducted (taking into
account the assessment
results for the first two
criteria)
Evaluation could not be
conducted (taking into
account the assessment
results for the first two
criteria)
The project is applying to This mitigation action will Implementing entity has
decided to conduct the
CDM. The action needs to generate emission
mitigation action as a
monitored to ensure the reduction by 2020
CDM project activity.
project is registered as a
CDM project activity.
Increase the
Mitigation action is not
energy efficiency in developed into specific
the production,
project activity. There is a
distribution and
lack of information on
13 utilization of
project's overall
energy by endcharacteristics.
consumers of
energy-related
service
Mitigation action is not
developed into a specific
project activity. There is a
lack of information on
Replacement of
project's overall
electricity
14
characteristics.
transmission and
The mitigation action has
not started yet. Operation
is planned for January,
2012.
The activity has not
applied to CDM or any
other type of carbon
market scheme yet. The
activity needs to be
monitored to ensure
implementing entity does
not apply to CDM or any
other carbon scheme in
the future.
CDM-PDD for the project
provides enough
information necessary to
analyze how the action
contributes to GHG
emission reduction, how
to calculate the reduction
amount, and what the
BAU scenario is.
Timeline
1st Screening
No double-counting
Scope and contents of the
mitigation action is clearly
defined including the
location and type of
activities.
Information
availability
Although information on
how mitigation action will
reduce GHG is available,
basic information that can
be used to analyze how
emission reduction can be
calculated, and what BAU
is are not available.
Distinctiveness
Basic Condition
Although the mitigation
action is developed into a
specific project, detailed
scope and content of the
action is not defined,
Landfill gas capture including the current and
and electricity
expected condition/
11
generation in
treatment method of the
Landfill Novi Sad
municipal solid waste,
amount of electricity
generated from the
waste.
No.
NAMA Title/
Measure to be
Introduced
Republic of Serbia NAMA Long List Evaluation
Although the detail of the action is
not identified, Serbia has a plan to
replace existing transmission and
distribution network to reduce
distribution loss. This action is
potentially an important mitigation
measure that is in line with Energy
Sector Development Strategy.
Mitigation action is in line with
Energy Sector Development
Strategy
Proposed mitigation action is in
line with The Strategy of Energy
Development in the Republic of
Serbia by 2015 (Official Gazette of
RS, no. 4405)
Proposed mitigation action is in
line with The Strategy of Energy
Development in the Republic of
Serbia by 2015 (Official Gazette of
RS, no. 4405): use of renewable
energy and energy recovery.
Compliance
Although the detail of the action is
not identified, a potential action will
lead to the reduction of GHG
emission through replacement of
old transmission and distribution
system network to reduce
distribution loss.
Although the detail of the action is
not identified, a potential action will
lead to the reduction of GHG
emission through rehabilitation of
boiler room, heating pipes,
distribution networks and house
substations.
The mitigation action will lead to
the reduction of GHG emission
through collection and utilization of
landfill gas.
Reduction of GHG will be achieved
by building a facility for landfill
capture and electricity generation,
which will displace the electricity
that would be generated from
other more carbon-intensive
sources. Methane emissions from
landfill site can also be avoided.
GHG reduction potential
General
Screening
Result
of
1st
3
The activity should be
continuously monitored
whether a real action/ project is
developed because Serbian
electricity grid suffers a high
percentage of electricity
transmission/ distribution loss
that can be improved
significantly.
The activity should be
continuously monitored
whether a real action/ project is
developed.
The action is not analyzed
further because: The
mitigation action will apply to
CDM, and thus the action will
not be listed on a NAMA short
list in order to avoid double
country of carbon emission
reduction between NAMA and
CDM. The action and related
actions should be continuously
monitored in case it is not
registered as CDM project.
The activity should be
continuously monitored
whether sufficient data and
information of the proposed
project is available.
Remarks on
1st Screening Analysis
Ministry of Energy, Development and Environmental Protection
Japan International Cooperation Agency
There is a general lack of
data and information
necessary for assessment
of mitigation potential.
Mitigation action is not
developed into a specific
project activity. There is a
lack of information on
project's overall
characteristics.
There is a general lack of
data and information
necessary for assessment
of mitigation potential.
There is a general lack of
data and information
necessary for assessment
of mitigation potential.
There is a general lack of
data and information
necessary for assessment
of mitigation potential.
Mitigation action is not
developed into a specific
project activity. There is a
lack of information on
project's overall
characteristics.
Mitigation action is not
developed into a specific
project activity. There is a
lack of information on
project's overall
characteristics.
Mitigation action is not
developed into a specific
project activity. There is a
lack of information on
project's overall
characteristics.
There is a general lack of
data and information
necessary for assessment
of mitigation potential.
Enough information is
available in order to
analyze how the action
contributes to GHG
emission reduction, how
to calculate the reduction
amount, and what the
BAU scenario is.
Scope and contents of the
mitigation action is clearly
defined including the
location and type of
activities. Exact locations
and building to be
installed with the device
has been identified yet.
* Shaded cells indicate the NAMA candidate fulfills a screening criteria.
New technologies
of combustion of
low quality coals,
biomass and waste
Energy
20
Introduction of
contemporary
19
technology for
consumer
Energy
Energy
Introduction of
contemporary
18 technology in the
heat distribution
system
Energy
Energy
Information
availability
Distinctiveness
Mitigation action is not
developed into a specific
project activity. There is a
Fuel switch in heat lack of information on
distribution plants: project's overall
17
from coal/ heavy
characteristics.
oil to biomass
Construction of
new natural gas
16
based thermal
power units
Energy
No.
Introduction of
Metering System
and Billing on the
15 Basis of Measured
Consumption in
District Heating
Systems in Serbia
Subsector
NAMA Title/
Measure to be
Introduced
Republic of Serbia NAMA Long List Evaluation
Evaluation could not be
conducted (taking into
account the assessment
results for the first two
criteria)
Evaluation could not be
conducted (taking into
account the assessment
results for the first two
criteria)
Evaluation could not be
conducted (taking into
account the assessment
results for the first two
criteria)
Evaluation could not be
conducted (taking into
account the assessment
results for the first two
criteria)
This mitigation action has
not been realized and will
not ensure emission
reduction by 2020
This mitigation action has
not been realized and will
not ensure emission
reduction by 2020
This mitigation action has
not been realized and will
not ensure emission
reduction by 2020
This mitigation action has
not been realized and will
not ensure emission
reduction by 2020
This mitigation action has
not been realized and will
not ensure emission
reduction by 2020
The mitigation action has
not started yet. According
to the project schedule,
construction is planned to
start in 2012 and
operation and emission
reduction will start in
2016
The activity has not
applied to CDM or any
other type of carbon
market scheme yet. The
activity needs to be
monitored to ensure
implementing entity does
not apply to CDM or any
other carbon scheme in
the future.
Evaluation could not be
conducted (taking into
account the assessment
results for the first two
criteria)
Timeline
Evaluation could not be
conducted (taking into
account the assessment
results for the first two
criteria)
Evaluation could not be
conducted (taking into
account the assessment
results for the first two
criteria)
Evaluation could not be
conducted (taking into
account the assessment
results for the first two
criteria)
Evaluation could not be
conducted (taking into
account the assessment
results for the first two
criteria)
Evaluation could not be
conducted (taking into
account the assessment
results for the first two
criteria)
Implementing entity is
willing to be a NAMA
implementing entity
according to the
interview.
Voluntary participation
1st Screening
No double-counting
Basic Condition
Reduction of GHG emissions in the
public sector for the central
distribution of heat and hot water
is achieved by introducing a heat
metering system and payment for
the consumed energy. Reduction of
heat consumption in residential
buildings connected to DH system
is expected to be around 20%.
GHG reduction potential
Proposed mitigation action is in
line with The Strategy of Energy
Sector Development in the
Republic of Serbia by 2015.
Although the detail of the action is
not identified, a potential action will
lead to the reduction of GHG
emission through introduction of
new technologies of combustion of
low quality coals, biomass and
waste.
The measure is in line with Initial Although the detail of the action is
National Communication of Serbia. not identified, a potential action will
lead to the reduction of GHG
emission through introduction of
contemporary technology for
consumer
The measure is in line with Initial Although the detail of the action is
National Communication of Serbia. not identified, a potential action will
lead to the reduction of GHG
emission through introduction of
temporary technology in the heat
distribution system
The measure is in line with Initial Although the detail of the action is
National Communication of Serbia. not identified, a potential action will
lead to the reduction of GHG
emission through fuel switch from
coal or heavy oil to renewable
biomass resource.
The measure is in line with Initial Although the detail of the action is
National Communication of Serbia. not identified, a potential action will
lead to the reduction of GHG
emission through construction of
new thermal power unit with
natural gas instead of lignite.
Proposed mitigation action is in
line with The first Energy efficiency
plan of the Republic of Serbia for
the period from 2010 to 2012:
Billing on the basis of actual
(measured) consumption of
energy by consumers connected to
district heating system. Reduction
of heating energy consumption by
providing individual metering of
heat consumption.
Compliance
General
3
Screening
Result
of
1st
4
The action is not analyzed
further because: There is no
concrete action planned in line
with the country's national
policy/ strategy and general
characteristic of the technology/
measure to be introduced is
unknown.
The activity should be
continuously monitored
whether a real action/ project is
developed.
The activity should be
continuously monitored
whether a real action/ project is
developed because there is a
large potential in energy
consumption reduction in heat
distribution system of Serbia.
The activity should be
continuously monitored
whether a real action/ project is
developed because Serbia has
set a strategy to introduce
biomass sources that exist
throughout the country to
preserve energy reserves.
The activity should be
continuously monitored
whether a real action/ project is
developed because Serbia has a
strategy to increase the use of
natural gas after gas pipeline
construction is realized.
All 1st screening criteria are
satisfied.
Remarks on
1st Screening Analysis
Ministry of Energy, Development and Environmental Protection
Japan International Cooperation Agency
Construction of
wind farm
Scope and contents of the
mitigation action is clearly
defined including the
location and type of
activities. Exact locations
and building to be
installed with the device
has been identified yet.
Distinctiveness
Use of geothermal
energy for heating
25
Energy
Enough information is
available to analyze how
the action contributes to
GHG emission reduction,
and what the BAU
scenario is. Also data for
preliminary estimation of
GHG emission reduction is
available.
There is lack of data and
information needed for
Assessment of mitigation
related potential.
Mitigation action is not
developed into specific
project activity. There is
lack of information on
type of activities.
There is lack of data and
information needed for
Assessment of mitigation
related potential.
There is a general lack of
data and information
necessary for assessment
of mitigation potential.
* Shaded cells indicate the NAMA candidate fulfills a screening criteria.
Introduction 1000
MW of Small
Biomass Boilers in
Serbia
24
No double-counting
Basic Condition
Evaluation could not be
conducted (taking into
account the assessment
results for the first two
criteria)
The activity has not
applied to CDM or any
other type of carbon
market scheme yet. The
activity needs to be
monitored to ensure
implementing entity does
not apply to CDM or any
other carbon scheme in
the future.
Evaluation could not be
conducted (taking into
account the assessment
results for the first two
criteria)
Evaluation could not be
conducted (taking into
account the assessment
results for the first two
criteria)
Enough information is
The activity will apply to
CDM.
available in order to
analyze how the action
contributes to GHG
emission reduction, how
to calculate the reduction
amount, and what the
BAU scenario is.
Information
availability
Although the detailed
sites are to be identified,
general scope and
content of the mitigation
action is clearly defined.
Mitigation action is not
developed into specific
project activity. There is
Installation of 5MW lack of information on
23 photovoltaic panels type of activities.
in Cagetina
A mitigation action is a
distinctive project but
detailed scope and
location of the project is
Installation of solar not available.
22
power generator
21
No.
Energy
Energy
Energy
Energy
Subsector
NAMA Title/
Measure to be
Introduced
Republic of Serbia NAMA Long List Evaluation
Voluntary participation
This mitigation action has
not been realized and will
not ensure emission
reduction by 2020
The set of actions is
expected to be
constructed and start
operation by 2018.
This mitigation action has
not been realized and will
not ensure emission
reduction by 2020
This mitigation action has
not been realized and will
not ensure emission
reduction by 2020
Evaluation could not be
conducted (taking into
account the assessment
results for the first two
criteria)
Implementing entity is
willing to be a NAMA
implementing entity
according to the
interview.
Evaluation could not be
conducted (taking into
account the assessment
results for the first two
criteria)
Evaluation could not be
conducted (taking into
account the assessment
results for the first two
criteria)
The mitigation action has The activity will apply to
not started yet. Emission CDM.
reduction will occur before
2020.
Timeline
1st Screening
Although the detail of the action is
not clear, Serbia is promoting
introduction of renewable energy
including wind power. This action
is potentially an important
mitigation measure is in line with
Energy Sector Development
Strategy of Serbia.
Proposed mitigation action is in
line with The Strategy of Energy
Sector Development in the
Republic of Serbia by 2015 (Official
Gazette of RS, no. 4405)
Proposed mitigation action is in
line with The Strategy of Energy
Sector Development in the
Republic of Serbia by 2015 (Official
Gazette of RS, no. 4405)
Proposed mitigation action is in
line with The Strategy of Energy
Sector Development in the
Republic of Serbia by 2015 (Official
Gazette of RS, no. 4405)
Construction of wind power plant
is in line with Energy Sector
Development Strategy.
Compliance
Although the detail of the action is
not clear, a potential action will
lead to the reduction of GHG
emission through the usage of
renewable energy.
Although the detail of the action is
not identified, a potential action will
lead to the reduction of GHG
emission through construction of
mall-scale thermal power unit using
biomass.
Although the detail of the action is
not identified, a potential action will
lead to the reduction of GHG
emission through installation of
solar panels, which will replace
consumption of fossil fuel.
Although the detail of the action is
not identified, a potential action will
lead to the reduction of GHG
emission through installation of
solar panels
Although this action will apply to
CDM scheme, this action will lead
to the reduction of GHG emission
through displacing electricity
generation from grid-connected
power plants.
GHG reduction potential
General
3
Screening
Result
of
1st
5
The activity should be
continuously monitored
whether a real action/ project is
developed because Serbia has
abundant geothermal resources
throughout the country that can
be used for heating purposes
and related actions can be
developed in line with national
strategy of renewable energy
promotion.
All 1st screening criteria are
satisfied.
The activity should be
continuously monitored
whether a real action/ project is
developed because Serbia has
been promoting the introduction
of new and renewable energy
including solar power.
The activity should be
continuously monitored
whether a real action/ project is
developed because Serbia has
been promoting the introduction
of new and renewable energy
such as solar power.
The action is not analyzed
further because: The
mitigation action will apply to
CDM, and thus the action will
not be listed on a NAMA short
list in order to avoid double
counting of carbon emission
reduction between NAMA and
CDM. The action and related
actions should be continuously
monitored in case it is not
registered as CDM project.
Remarks on
1st Screening Analysis
Ministry of Energy, Development and Environmental Protection
Japan International Cooperation Agency
Industry
Enough information is
available in order to
analyze how the action
contributes to GHG
emission reduction, how
to calculate the reduction
amount, and what the
BAU scenario is.
Information
availability
The Project has been
continuously considered
since 1981. The General
design was finished in
1980s and construction of
pipeline started in 1990s,
but it is not finished.
Sufficient data and
information on activity is
available.
Information and data to
estimate GHG emission
reduction potential is not
available.
Scope and contents of the
mitigation action is clearly
defined including the
location and type of
activities.
Scope and contents of the
mitigation action is clearly
defined including the type
of activities.
Mitigation action is not
There is a general lack of
developed into specific
data and information
project activity. There is a necessary for assessment
lack of information on
of mitigation potential.
project's overall
characteristics.
Scope and contents of the
mitigation action is clearly
defined including the
location and type of
activities.
Distinctiveness
* Shaded cells indicate the NAMA candidate fulfills a screening criteria.
Awareness raising
for energy
efficiency
improvement
Energy
29
Using of Waste
Heat from Power
28 Plant for Heating
the City of
Belgrade, Serbia
Energy
Energy
Anaerobic
treatment of
27 animal manure
from small and
medium size farms
Energy
No.
Use of Solar
Energy for
Domestic Hot
26
Water Production
in Heating Plant
Cerak in Belgrade
Subsector
NAMA Title/
Measure to be
Introduced
Republic of Serbia NAMA Long List Evaluation
The activity has not
applied to CDM or any
other type of carbon
market scheme.
The activity has not
applied to CDM or any
other type of carbon
market scheme yet. The
activity needs to be
monitored to ensure
implementing entity does
not apply to CDM or any
other carbon scheme in
the future.
Evaluation could not be
conducted (taking into
account the assessment
results for the first two
criteria)
The activity has not
applied to CDM or any
other type of carbon
market scheme yet. The
activity needs to be
monitored to ensure
implementing entity does
not apply to CDM or any
other carbon scheme in
the future.
No double-counting
Basic Condition
Implementing entity is
willing to be a NAMA
implementing entity
according to the
interview.
Evaluation could not be
conducted (taking into
account the assessment
results for the first two
criteria)
Implementing entity is
willing to be a NAMA
implementing entity
according to the
interview.
Voluntary participation
The mitigation action has Mitigation action
completed with the
completed.
support from Norway
government. No similar
activity is planned.
Construction is planned
for 2013, and operation
starts in 2016, that will be
the year for start of
emissions reduction.
This mitigation action has
not been realized and will
not ensure emission
reduction by 2020
Construction is planned
for 2012, and operation
starts in 2014, that will be
the year for start of
emissions reduction.
Timeline
1st Screening
The mitigation measure will
indirectly lead to the emission
reduction in a long term; however,
double-counting needs to be
avoided for emission reduction
from actual mitigation measure
resulting from the target measure.
GHG emissions reduction will be
achieved through installation of
pipeline for efficient use of
abandoned heat energy, which will
reduce GHG that would be emitted
from heat plants (energy saving of
natural gas and heavy oil) in the
absence of the activity.
Activity is in line with Regulation on
Establishing The Power Supply
Development Strategy for the
Republic of Serbia up to year 2015
for the period from 2007 to 2012.
1) Long-term heating solution for
the city of Belgrade, 2) Reduction in
energy dependence of the city of
Belgrade on expensive imported
natural gas with the cheaper
domestically produced lignite, 3)
Savings in fuel with using combined
energy generation
In compliance with First Energy
Efficiency Plan 2010-2012 p42,
p44
Evaluation could not be conducted
because the nature of the action is
not clear; GHG emissions
reduction/ increase depends on the
condition of anaerobic treatment.
Reduction of GHG will be achieved
by replacing natural gas
consumption with renewable
energy source for water heating.
GHG reduction potential
Although the action is in line with
the National Waste Management
Strategy (2010-2019) ("Official
Gazette of RS” no. 29/2010), the
action is not related to energy
efficiency improvement.
Proposed mitigation action is in
line with The Strategy of Energy
Sector Development in the
Republic of Serbia by 2015 (Official
Gazette of RS, no. 4405)
Compliance
General
3
3
Screening
Result
of
1st
6
The action is not analyzed
further because: There is no
another concrete action planned
in line with the country's
national policy/ strategy than
the one already completed and
general characteristic of the
technology/ measure to be
introduced is unknown. Also,
appropriate MRV system must
be carefully established
(methodology to estimate
emission reduction,
measurement and verification
methods, how to avoid doublecounting with other actual
measures associated with this
measure)
All 1st screening criteria are
satisfied.
The action is not analyzed
further because: There is no
concrete action planned in line
with the country's national
policy/ strategy and general
characteristic of the technology/
measure to be introduced is
unknown.
All 1st screening criteria are
satisfied.
Remarks on
1st Screening Analysis
Ministry of Energy, Development and Environmental Protection
Japan International Cooperation Agency
Public
Industry
Industry
Industry
Mitigation action is not
developed into specific
project activity.
Mitigation action is not
developed into specific
project activity. There is
lack of information on
specific location and type
of activities. Further
detailed scope will be
identified once the related
law is adopted.
Distinctiveness
There is a general lack of
data and information
necessary for assessment
of mitigation potential.
Details will be available
once the new law/
regulation is adopted.
There is lack of data and
information needed for
Assessment of mitigation
related potential.
There is a general lack of
data and information
necessary for assessment
of mitigation potential.
There is a general lack of
data and information
necessary for assessment
of mitigation potential.
Information
availability
* Shaded cells indicate the NAMA candidate fulfills a screening criteria.
Mitigation action is not
developed into specific
project activity. There is a
lack of information on
details of the system.
Introduction of
Further detailed scope will
energy
be identified once the
management
33
system for industry related law is adopted.
and commercial
entities
Mitigation action is not
developed into specific
project activity. There is
Fuel change/ mix lack of information on
location and type of
in large factories
32
(refineries, cement activities.
plants)
Fuel switch from
liquid fuel to
31
natural gas in
industry sector
Industry
No.
Rationalization of
energy
consumption and
30
energy efficiency
improvement in
industry sector
Subsector
NAMA Title/
Measure to be
Introduced
Republic of Serbia NAMA Long List Evaluation
Evaluation could not be
conducted (taking into
account the assessment
results for the first two
criteria)
Evaluation could not be
conducted (taking into
account the assessment
results for the first two
criteria)
Evaluation could not be
conducted (taking into
account the assessment
results for the first two
criteria)
Evaluation could not be
conducted (taking into
account the assessment
results for the first two
criteria)
No double-counting
Basic Condition
This mitigation action has
not been realized and will
not ensure emission
reduction by 2020
This mitigation action has
not been realized and will
not ensure emission
reduction by 2020
This mitigation action has
not been realized and will
not ensure emission
reduction by 2020
This mitigation action has
not been realized and will
not ensure emission
reduction by 2020
Timeline
Evaluation could not be
conducted (taking into
account the assessment
results for the first two
criteria)
Evaluation could not be
conducted (taking into
account the assessment
results for the first two
criteria)
Evaluation could not be
conducted (taking into
account the assessment
results for the first two
criteria)
Evaluation could not be
conducted (taking into
account the assessment
results for the first two
criteria)
Voluntary participation
1st Screening
Although the detail of the action is
not identified, such measures as
automation process, monitoring,
waste energy utilization, etc. have
a potential to reduce emissions
from industrial processes.
Although the detail of the action is
not identified yet, Serbia is
promoting Rationalization of
consumption and increase in
energy efficiency described in the
First energy Efficiency Plan. This
action is potentially an important
mitigation measure is in line with
such policy.
In compliance with First Energy
Efficiency Plan 2010-2012 p42,
p45
The action is in line with the
National Waste Management
Strategy (2010-2019) ("Official
Gazette of RS” no. 29/2010).
The mitigation measure will
indirectly lead to the emission
reduction in a long term; however,
double-counting needs to be
avoided for emission reduction
from actual mitigation measure
resulting from the target measure.
Although the detail of the action is
not identified, a potential action will
lead to the reduction of GHG
emission through fuel change/ mix
in large factories (refineries,
cement plants)
The measure is in line with Initial Although the detail of the action is
National Communication of Serbia. not identified, a potential action will
lead to the reduction of GHG
emission through substitution of
liquid fuel with natural gas.
GHG reduction potential
Compliance
General
Screening
Result
of
1st
7
The action should be
continuously monitored
whether the relevant legal
system is adopted. However,
appropriate MRV system must
be carefully established
(methodology to estimate
emission reduction,
measurement and verification
methods, how to avoid doublecounting with other actual
measures associated with this
measure)
The activity should be
continuously monitored
whether a real action/ project is
developed because Serbia has a
strategy to increase the use of
natural gas after gas pipeline
construction is realized while oil
refineries and cement plants are
big consumers of energy.
The activity should be
continuously monitored
whether a real action/ project is
developed because Serbia has a
strategy to increase the use of
natural gas after gas pipeline
construction is realized.
The action is not analyzed
further because: There is no
concrete action planned in line
with the country's national
policy and strategy and general
characteristic of the action to be
taken is unknown. Also,
appropriate MRV system must
be carefully established
(methodology to estimate
emission reduction,
measurement and verification
methods, how to avoid doublecounting with other actual
measures associated with this
measure)
Remarks on
1st Screening Analysis
Ministry of Energy, Development and Environmental Protection
Japan International Cooperation Agency
Public
Building
Industry
Public
Building
Industry
Industry
Public
Industry
Subsector
Energy audits in
industry
Mitigation action is not
developed into specific
project activity. There is a
lack of information on
details of the system.
Further detailed scope will
be identified once the
related law is adopted.
Distinctiveness
There is a general lack of
data and information
necessary for assessment
of mitigation potential.
Details will be available
once the new law/
regulation is adopted.
There is a general lack of
data and information
necessary for assessment
of mitigation potential.
Details will be available
once the new law/
regulation is adopted.
There is a general lack of
data and information
necessary for assessment
of mitigation potential.
There is a general lack of
data and information
necessary for assessment
of mitigation potential.
Details will be available
once the new law/
regulation is adopted.
Information
availability
* Shaded cells indicate the NAMA candidate fulfills a screening criteria.
Mitigation action is not
developed into specific
project activity. There is a
Introduction of
lack of information on
credit lines on
favorable terms for details of the system.
implementation of Further detailed scope will
be identified once the
37 EEI measures in
related law is adopted.
industry,
households, and
commercial
buildings
"Decree on incentive
measures for electricity
generation using
renewable energy sources
and for combined heat
Incentive tariffs for
and power (CHP)
highly efficient
generation" in regard to
35 cogeneration in
the Energy Law was
industrial
enacted and came into
companies
effect since 2010. No
further plan on
strengthening the CHP
plant efficiency is
identified.
Mitigation action is not
developed into specific
project activity. There is a
lack of information on
details of the system.
Further detailed scope will
Establishment of
36 Energy Efficiency be identified once the
related law is adopted.
Fund
34
No.
NAMA Title/
Measure to be
Introduced
Republic of Serbia NAMA Long List Evaluation
Evaluation could not be
conducted (taking into
account the assessment
results for the first two
criteria)
Evaluation could not be
conducted (taking into
account the assessment
results for the first two
criteria)
Evaluation could not be
conducted (taking into
account the assessment
results for the first two
criteria)
Evaluation could not be
conducted (taking into
account the assessment
results for the first two
criteria)
No double-counting
Basic Condition
This mitigation action has
not been realized and will
not ensure emission
reduction by 2020
This mitigation action has
not been realized and will
not ensure emission
reduction by 2020
This mitigation action has
not been realized and will
not ensure emission
reduction by 2020
This mitigation action has
not been realized and will
not ensure emission
reduction by 2020
Timeline
Evaluation could not be
conducted (taking into
account the assessment
results for the first two
criteria)
Evaluation could not be
conducted (taking into
account the assessment
results for the first two
criteria)
Evaluation could not be
conducted (taking into
account the assessment
results for the first two
criteria)
Evaluation could not be
conducted (taking into
account the assessment
results for the first two
criteria)
Voluntary participation
1st Screening
In compliance with First Energy
Efficiency Plan 2010-2012 p19,
p23, p31, p39, p48
In compliance with First Energy
Efficiency Plan 2010-2012 p18,
p23, p30, p38, p47
In compliance with First Energy
Efficiency Plan 2010-2012 p42,
p47
In compliance with First Energy
Efficiency Plan 2010-2012 p42,
p46
Compliance
The mitigation measure will
indirectly lead to the emission
reduction in a long term; however,
double-counting needs to be
avoided for emission reduction
from actual mitigation measure
resulting from the target measure.
The mitigation measure will
indirectly lead to the emission
reduction in a long term; however,
double-counting needs to be
avoided for emission reduction
from actual mitigation measure
resulting from the target measure.
The mitigation measure will
indirectly lead to the emission
reduction in a long term; however,
double-counting needs to be
avoided for emission reduction
from actual mitigation measure
resulting from the target measure.
The mitigation measure will
indirectly lead to the emission
reduction in a long term; however,
double-counting needs to be
avoided for emission reduction
from actual mitigation measure
resulting from the target measure.
GHG reduction potential
General
Screening
Result
of
1st
8
The action should be
continuously monitored
whether the relevant legal
system is adopted. However,
appropriate MRV system must
be carefully established
(methodology to estimate
emission reduction,
measurement and verification
methods, how to avoid doublecounting with other actual
measures associated with this
measure)
The action should be
continuously monitored
whether the relevant legal
system is adopted. However,
appropriate MRV system must
be carefully established
(methodology to estimate
emission reduction,
measurement and verification
methods, how to avoid doublecounting with other actual
measures associated with this
measure)
The action should be
continuously monitored
whether the relevant legal
system is adopted. However,
appropriate MRV system must
be carefully established
(methodology to estimate
emission reduction,
measurement and verification
methods, how to avoid doublecounting with other actual
measures associated with this
measure)
The action should be
continuously monitored
whether the relevant legal
system is adopted. However,
appropriate MRV system must
be carefully established
(methodology to estimate
emission reduction,
measurement and verification
methods, how to avoid doublecounting with other actual
measures associated with this
measure)
Remarks on
1st Screening Analysis
Ministry of Energy, Development and Environmental Protection
Japan International Cooperation Agency
Transport
Transport
Transport
Transport
Transport
Industry
Subsector
Distinctiveness
Evaluation could not be
conducted (taking into
account the assessment
results for the first two
criteria)
Evaluation could not be
conducted (taking into
account the assessment
results for the first two
criteria)
Mitigation action is not
There is a general lack of
developed into specific
data and information
project activity. There is a necessary for assessment
Introduction of up
lack of information on
of mitigation potential.
to date and highly
42
project's overall
efficient motor
characteristics.
vehicle
Mitigation action is not
There is a general lack of
developed into specific
data and information
Introduction of
project activity. There is a necessary for assessment
European
lack of information on
of mitigation potential.
standards for
project's overall
43
energy efficiency in characteristics.
the transport
sector
* Shaded cells indicate the NAMA candidate fulfills a screening criteria.
Increase of the
level and the
efficiency of river
transport
Evaluation could not be
conducted (taking into
account the assessment
results for the first two
criteria)
40
Mitigation action is not
There is a general lack of
developed into specific
data and information
project activity. There is a necessary for assessment
Modal shift from
lack of information on
of mitigation potential.
passenger and
project's overall
41 freight road
transport to railway characteristics.
and waterway
Evaluation could not be
conducted (taking into
account the assessment
results for the first two
criteria)
There is a general lack of
data and information
necessary for assessment
of mitigation potential.
Evaluation could not be
conducted (taking into
account the assessment
results for the first two
criteria)
Evaluation could not be
conducted (taking into
account the assessment
results for the first two
criteria)
No double-counting
There is a general lack of
data and information
necessary for assessment
of mitigation potential.
Information
availability
Basic Condition
There is a general lack of
data and information
necessary for assessment
of mitigation potential.
Mitigation action is not
developed into a specific
project activity. There is a
lack of information on
project's overall
characteristics.
Mitigation action is not
developed into specific
project activity. There is a
Introduction of
technical measures lack of information on
38
details of the system.
for reducing
Further detailed scope will
thermal losses
be identified once the
related law is adopted.
Mitigation action is not
developed into a specific
project activity. There is a
Re-establishment
lack of information on
of an efficient
39
project's overall
international rail
characteristics.
transport
No.
NAMA Title/
Measure to be
Introduced
Republic of Serbia NAMA Long List Evaluation
This mitigation action has
not been realized and will
not ensure emission
reduction by 2020
This mitigation action has
not been realized and will
not ensure emission
reduction by 2020
This mitigation action has
not been realized and will
not ensure emission
reduction by 2020
This mitigation action has
not been realized and will
not ensure emission
reduction by 2020
This mitigation action has
not been realized and will
not ensure emission
reduction by 2020
This mitigation action has
not been realized and will
not ensure emission
reduction by 2020
Timeline
Evaluation could not be
conducted (taking into
account the assessment
results for the first two
criteria)
Evaluation could not be
conducted (taking into
account the assessment
results for the first two
criteria)
Evaluation could not be
conducted (taking into
account the assessment
results for the first two
criteria)
Evaluation could not be
conducted (taking into
account the assessment
results for the first two
criteria)
Evaluation could not be
conducted (taking into
account the assessment
results for the first two
criteria)
Evaluation could not be
conducted (taking into
account the assessment
results for the first two
criteria)
Voluntary participation
1st Screening
Although the detail of the action is
not identified, a potential action will
lead to the reduction of GHG
emission through introduction of
technical measures for reducing
thermal losses
GHG reduction potential
Although the detail of the action is
not identified, the First Energy
Efficiency Plan describes the action
as a potentially important
mitigation measure.
Although the detail of the action is
not identified, the First Energy
Efficiency Plan describes the action
as a potentially important
mitigation measure.
Although the detail of the action is
not identified, the First Energy
Efficiency Plan describes the action
as a potentially important
mitigation measure.
Although the detail of the action is
not identified, the First Energy
Efficiency Plan describes the action
as a potentially important
mitigation measure.
Although the detail of the action is
not identified, a potential action will
lead to the reduction of GHG
emission through introduction of
European standards for energy
efficiency in the transport sector
Although the detail of the action is
not identified, a potential action will
lead to the reduction of GHG
emission through introduction of
up to date and highly efficient
motor vehicle
Although the detail of the action is
not identified, a potential action will
lead to the reduction of GHG
emission through reducing road
transport for passenger and goods
by increasing other transportation
modes (railway, river way, etc.)
Although the detail of the action is
not identified, a potential action will
lead to the reduction of GHG
emission through increase of the
level and efficiency of river
transport.
The measure is in line with Initial Although the detail of the action is
National Communication of Serbia. not identified, a potential action will
lead to the reduction of GHG
emission through re-establishment
of an efficient international rail
transport.
In compliance with Energy Sector
Development Strategy
Compliance
General
Screening
Result
of
1st
9
The activity should be
continuously monitored
whether a real action/ project is
developed because emissions
from road transport is expected
to increase in Serbia, which has
a big mitigation potential.
The activity should be
continuously monitored
whether a real action/ project is
developed because emissions
from road transport is expected
to increase in Serbia, which has
a big mitigation potential.
The activity should be
continuously monitored
whether a real action/ project is
developed because emissions
from road transport is expected
to increase in Serbia and rail
and river transports have big
mitigation potential.
The activity should be
continuously monitored
whether a real action/ project is
developed because emissions
from road transport is expected
to increase in Serbia and river
transport has big mitigation
potential.
The activity should be
continuously monitored
whether a real action/ project is
developed because emissions
from road transport is expected
to increase in Serbia and rail
transport has big mitigation
potential.
The action should be
continuously monitored
whether the relevant legal
system is adopted.
Remarks on
1st Screening Analysis
Ministry of Energy, Development and Environmental Protection
Japan International Cooperation Agency
There is a general lack of
data and information
necessary for assessment
of mitigation potential.
There is a general lack of
data and information
necessary for assessment
of mitigation potential.
There is a general lack of
data and information
necessary for assessment
of mitigation potential.
Mitigation action is not
developed into a specific
project activity. There is a
Installation of
lack of information on
48 gasoline and diesel
project's overall
hybrid
characteristics.
Mitigation action is not
developed into a specific
project activity. There is a
lack of information on
project's overall
characteristics.
Mitigation action is not
developed into a specific
project activity. There is a
lack of information on
project's overall
characteristics.
50 Use of biofuels
Transport
* Shaded cells indicate the NAMA candidate fulfills a screening criteria.
49
Refurbishment of
road structure
There is a general lack of
data and information
necessary for assessment
of mitigation potential.
Mitigation action is not
developed into a specific
Introduction of
project activity. There is a
incentive
lack of information on
47 mechanisms for
project's overall
the replacement of
characteristics.
existing fleet
Transport
Transport
Transport
Transport
Transport
Evaluation could not be
conducted (taking into
account the assessment
results for the first two
criteria)
Evaluation could not be
conducted (taking into
account the assessment
results for the first two
criteria)
Evaluation could not be
conducted (taking into
account the assessment
results for the first two
criteria)
Evaluation could not be
conducted (taking into
account the assessment
results for the first two
criteria)
Evaluation could not be
conducted (taking into
account the assessment
results for the first two
criteria)
Evaluation could not be
conducted (taking into
account the assessment
results for the first two
criteria)
Mitigation action is not
There is a general lack of
developed into specific
data and information
project activity. There is a necessary for assessment
lack of information on
of mitigation potential.
project's overall
characteristics.
There is a general lack of
data and information
necessary for assessment
of mitigation potential.
Promotion of ecodriving and low
45 cost energy
efficient measures
in transport
No double-counting
Evaluation could not be
conducted (taking into
account the assessment
results for the first two
criteria)
Information
availability
Basic Condition
There is a general lack of
data and information
necessary for assessment
of mitigation potential.
Mitigation action is not
developed into a specific
project activity. There is a
lack of information on
project's overall
characteristics.
Distinctiveness
Mitigation action is not
developed into a specific
project activity. There is a
Introduction of
lack of information on
46 road transport fleet
project's overall
management
characteristics.
Creation of an
44 energy efficient
transport system
No.
Transport
Subsector
NAMA Title/
Measure to be
Introduced
Republic of Serbia NAMA Long List Evaluation
This mitigation action has
not been realized and will
not ensure emission
reduction by 2020
This mitigation action has
not been realized and will
not ensure emission
reduction by 2020
This mitigation action has
not been realized and will
not ensure emission
reduction by 2020
This mitigation action has
not been realized and will
not ensure emission
reduction by 2020
This mitigation action has
not been realized and will
not ensure emission
reduction by 2020
This mitigation action has
not been realized and will
not ensure emission
reduction by 2020
This mitigation action has
not been realized and will
not ensure emission
reduction by 2020
Timeline
Evaluation could not be
conducted (taking into
account the assessment
results for the first two
criteria)
Evaluation could not be
conducted (taking into
account the assessment
results for the first two
criteria)
Evaluation could not be
conducted (taking into
account the assessment
results for the first two
criteria)
Evaluation could not be
conducted (taking into
account the assessment
results for the first two
criteria)
Evaluation could not be
conducted (taking into
account the assessment
results for the first two
criteria)
Evaluation could not be
conducted (taking into
account the assessment
results for the first two
criteria)
Evaluation could not be
conducted (taking into
account the assessment
results for the first two
criteria)
Voluntary participation
1st Screening
Although the detail of the action is
not identified, the First Energy
Efficiency Plan describes the action
as a potentially important
mitigation measure.
Although the detail of the action is
not identified, the First Energy
Efficiency Plan describes the action
as a potentially important
mitigation measure.
Although the detail of the action is
not identified, the First Energy
Efficiency Plan describes the action
as a potentially important
mitigation measure.
The First Energy Efficiency Plan
describes the action as a
potentially important mitigation
measure.
Although the detail of the action is
not identified, the First Energy
Efficiency Plan describes the action
as a potentially important
mitigation measure.
Although the detail of the action is
not identified, the First Energy
Efficiency Plan describes the action
as a potentially important
mitigation measure.
Although the detail of the action is
not identified, the First Energy
Efficiency Plan describes the action
as a potentially important
mitigation measure.
Compliance
Although the detail of the action is
not identified, a potential action will
lead to the reduction of GHG
emission through introduction of
biofuels in transport sector.
Although the detail of the action is
not identified, a potential action will
lead to the reduction of GHG
emission through refurbishment of
road structure
Although the detail of the action is
not identified, a potential action will
lead to the reduction of GHG
emission through installation of
gasoline and diesel hybrid
The action will lead to the
reduction of GHG emission through
replacement of existing buses with
more energy-efficient ones.
Although the detail of the action is
not identified, a potential action will
lead to the reduction of GHG
emission through introduction of
road transport fleet management
Although the detail of the action is
not identified, a potential action will
lead to the reduction of GHG
emission through promotion of
eco-driving and low cost energy
efficient measures in transport
Although the detail of the action is
not identified, a potential action will
lead to the reduction of GHG
emission through introduction of
public energy efficient public
transport system.
GHG reduction potential
General
Screening
Result
of
1st
10
The activity should be
continuously monitored
whether a real action/ project is
developed because emissions
from road transport is expected
to increase in Serbia, which has
a big mitigation potential.
The activity should be
continuously monitored
whether a real action/ project is
developed because emissions
from road transport is expected
to increase in Serbia, which has
a big mitigation potential.
The action is not analyzed
further because: There is no
concrete action planned in line
with the country's national
policy/ strategy and general
characteristic of the technology/
measure to be introduced is
unknown.
The activity should be
continuously monitored
whether a real action/ project is
developed because emissions
from road transport is expected
to increase in Serbia, which has
a big mitigation potential.
The action is not analyzed
further because: There is no
concrete action planned in line
with the country's national
policy/ strategy and general
characteristic of the technology/
measure to be introduced is
unknown.
The activity should be
continuously monitored
whether a real action/ project is
developed because emissions
from road transport is expected
to increase in Serbia, which has
a big mitigation potential.
The activity should be
continuously monitored
whether a real action/ project is
developed because emissions
from road transport is expected
to increase in Serbia, which has
a big mitigation potential.
Remarks on
1st Screening Analysis
Ministry of Energy, Development and Environmental Protection
Japan International Cooperation Agency
Switching of old
buses and energy
efficiency
52
improvement in
Belgrade and
Pancevo
Rehabilitation of
53 Arterial Roads in
Serbia
Rehabilitation of
54 Regional Roads in
Serbia
Design and
construction of 21
bypass roads in
Serbia
Transport
Transport
Transport
Transport
Sufficient information is
available in order to
analyze how the action
contributes to GHG
emission reduction, how
to calculate the reduction
amount, and what the
BAU scenario is.
Sufficient information is
available in order to
analyze how the action
contributes to GHG
emission reduction, how
to calculate the reduction
amount, and what the
BAU scenario is.
Sufficient information is
available in order to
analyze how the action
contributes to GHG
emission reduction, how
to calculate the reduction
amount, and what the
BAU scenario is.
Although the project
scope is clearly defined,
sufficient data to analyze
emission reduction
potential and BAU
scenario.
Scope and contents of the
mitigation action is clearly
defined including the
locations and type of
activities.
Scope and contents of the
mitigation action is clearly
defined including the
locations and type of
activities.
Scope and contents of the
mitigation action is clearly
defined including the
locations and type of
activities.
There is a general lack of
data and information
necessary for assessment
of mitigation potential.
Information
availability
Scope and contents of the
mitigation action is clearly
defined including the
locations and type of
activities.
Mitigation action is not
developed into a specific
project activity. There is a
lack of information on
project's overall
characteristics.
Distinctiveness
* Shaded cells indicate the NAMA candidate fulfills a screening criteria.
55
51
Transport
Sustainable
transport
No.
Subsector
NAMA Title/
Measure to be
Introduced
Republic of Serbia NAMA Long List Evaluation
This mitigation action has
not been realized and will
not ensure emission
reduction by 2020
Timeline
Evaluation could not be
conducted (taking into
account the assessment
results for the first two
criteria)
Voluntary participation
1st Screening
The activity has not
applied to CDM or any
other type of carbon
market scheme yet. The
activity needs to be
monitored to ensure
implementing entity does
not apply to CDM or any
other carbon scheme in
the future.
The activity has not
applied to CDM or any
other type of carbon
market scheme yet. The
activity needs to be
monitored to ensure
implementing entity does
not apply to CDM or any
other carbon scheme in
the future.
The activity has not
applied to CDM or any
other type of carbon
market scheme yet. The
activity needs to be
monitored to ensure
implementing entity does
not apply to CDM or any
other carbon scheme in
the future.
All rehabilitation activities
will be completed by
2016, and thus the
emission reduction will be
achieved before 2020.
All rehabilitation activities
will be completed by
2016, and thus the
emission reduction will be
achieved before 2020.
All rehabilitation activities
will be completed by
2016, and thus the
emission reduction will be
achieved before 2020.
Implementing entity is
willing to be a NAMA
implementing entity
according to the
interview.
Implementing entity is
willing to be a NAMA
implementing entity
according to the
interview.
Implementing entity is
willing to be a NAMA
implementing entity
according to the
interview.
The activity has not
Mitigation action is
Implementing entity is
applied to CDM or any
expected to be realized in willing to be a NAMA
other type of carbon
2012.
implementing entity
market scheme yet. The
according to the
activity needs to be
interview.
monitored to ensure
implementing entity does
not apply to CDM or any
other carbon scheme in
the future.
Evaluation could not be
conducted (taking into
account the assessment
results for the first two
criteria)
No double-counting
Basic Condition
The measure is in line with Initial
National Communication of Serbia
as well as the Action plan for the
Strategy of Railway, Road, Inland
Waterway, Air and Intermodal
Transport.
The measure is in line with Initial
National Communication of Serbia
as well as the Action plan for the
Strategy of Railway, Road, Inland
Waterway, Air and Intermodal
Transport.
The measure is in line with Initial
National Communication of Serbia
as well as the Action plan for the
Strategy of Railway, Road, Inland
Waterway, Air and Intermodal
Transport.
The First Energy Efficiency Plan
describes the action as a
potentially important mitigation
measure.
In compliance with Master Plan
study for transport sector of the
City of Belgrade
Compliance
Whether construction of bypass
roads in target regions needs to be
carefully analyzed using traffic
volume data both current and
projections, which are not available
at the moment.
GHG emissions reduction will be
achieved through rehabilitating
inadequately-maintained regional
roads, that will allow cars to drive
on a higher, more energy-efficient
speed, in which cars consume less
fuels to travel the same distance.
GHG emissions reduction will be
achieved through rehabilitating
inadequately-maintained arterial
roads, that will allow cars to drive
on a higher, more energy-efficient
speed, in which cars consume less
fuels to travel the same distance.
The action will lead to the
reduction of GHG emission through
replacement of existing buses with
more energy-efficient ones.
Although the detail of the action is
not identified, a potential action will
lead to the reduction of GHG
emission through improvement of
sustainability in transportation
sector
GHG reduction potential
General
3
3
3
Screening
Result
of
1st
11
The activity should be
continuously monitored
whether sufficient data and
methodology to analyze
emission reduction potential is
available, because emissions
from road transport is expected
to increase in Serbia, which has
a big mitigation potential.
All 1st screening criteria are
satisfied.
All 1st screening criteria are
satisfied.
All 1st screening criteria are
satisfied.
The action is not analyzed
further because: There is no
concrete action planned in line
with the country's national
policy/ strategy and general
characteristic of the technology/
measure to be introduced is
unknown.
Remarks on
1st Screening Analysis
Ministry of Energy, Development and Environmental Protection
Japan International Cooperation Agency
Public
Building
Building
Reduction of the
use of electricity
for heating
purposes
* Shaded cells indicate the NAMA candidate fulfills a screening criteria.
60
Evaluation could not be
conducted (taking into
account the assessment
results for the first two
criteria)
There is lack of data and
information needed for
Assessment of mitigation
related potential.
Mitigation action is not
developed into a specific
project activity. There is a
lack of information on
project's overall
characteristics.
This mitigation action has
not been realized and will
not ensure emission
reduction by 2020.
The activity has not
Replacement activity will
applied to CDM or any
start in 2013 and will be
other type of carbon
completed in 2020.
market scheme yet. The
activity needs to be
monitored to ensure
implementing entity does
not apply to CDM or any
other carbon scheme in
the future.
This mitigation action has
not been realized and will
not ensure emission
reduction by 2020.
Evaluation could not be
conducted (taking into
account the assessment
results for the first two
criteria)
Implementing entity is
willing to be a NAMA
implementing entity
according to the
interview.
Voluntary participation
Evaluation could not be
conducted (taking into
account the assessment
results for the first two
criteria)
Implementing entity is
willing to be a NAMA
implementing entity
according to the
interview.
The activity has not
Mitigation action is
Implementing entity is
applied to CDM or any
expected to be realized in willing to be a NAMA
other type of carbon
2012.
implementing entity
market scheme yet. The
according to the
activity needs to be
interview.
monitored to ensure
implementing entity does
not apply to CDM or any
other carbon scheme in
the future.
Evaluation could not be
conducted (taking into
account the assessment
results for the first two
criteria)
This mitigation action has
not been realized and will
not ensure emission
reduction by 2020.
General information on
how mitigation action will
reduce GHG, how
emission reduction can be
calculated, and what BAU
is available.
There is lack of data and
information needed for
Assessment of mitigation
related potential.
Mitigation action is not
developed into specific
project activity. There is
lack of information on
location and type of
activities.
The activity has not
applied to CDM or any
other type of carbon
market scheme yet.
Timeline
Scope and contents of the
mitigation action is clearly
Improvement of
defined. Detailed locations
Old Residential
and target buildings will
Buildings Envelope need to be defined during
59 (exterior doors,
the design phase.
windows and
thermal insulation)
in Serbia
Expansion of
58 Existing Heating
Network in Valjevo
Building
Mitigation action is not
developed into a specific
project activity. Details are
yet to be decided
regarding the locations as
well as technologies to be
introduced among many
options.
Mitigation action is not
developed into a specific
project activity. Details
are yet to be decided
regarding the locations as
well as technologies to be
introduced among many
options.
No double-counting
1st Screening
Sufficient information is
available in order to
analyze how the action
contributes to GHG
emission reduction, how
to calculate the reduction
amount, and what the
BAU scenario is.
Building
Information
availability
Distinctiveness
Basic Condition
Scope and contents of the
mitigation action is clearly
defined including the
locations and type of
activities.
Development of
57 local natural gas
network
Transport
No.
Use of different
types of road
constructions on
56 state roads of I
and II category in
the Republic of
Serbia
Subsector
NAMA Title/
Measure to be
Introduced
Republic of Serbia NAMA Long List Evaluation
In compliance with First Energy
Efficiency Plan 2010-2012, p17,
p21, p28, p34
Proposed mitigation action is in
line with The first Energy
Efficiency Plan of the Republic of
Serbia for the period from 2010 to
2012; Regulation on energy
efficiency in buildings.
In compliance with Energy Sector
Development Strategy
In compliance with Energy Sector
Development Strategy
In compliance with the Action plan
for the Strategy of Railway, Road,
Inland Waterway, Air and
Intermodal Transport.
Compliance
Although the detail of the action is
not identified, a potential action will
lead to the reduction of GHG
emission through reduction of the
use of electricity for heating
purposes, because the grid
electricity is mostly generated by
carbon-intensive lignite-fired
thermal power plants.
GHG emissions reduction will be
achieved through improvement of
energy use efficiency by
rehabilitation of existing old
residential buildings.
The action will lead to the
reduction of GHG emission through
allowing heat users to switch their
heat source from old inefficient
small heating boilers to modern
large heat plant, by connecting
users with expanded heating
network system.
Although the detail of the action is
not identified, a potential action will
lead to the reduction of GHG
emission through development of
local natural gas network
Although the detail of the action is
not identified, a potential action will
lead to the reduction of GHG
emission through various measures
such as the reduced use of energy
for preparing road construction
material by introducing recycled
road waste materials. etc.
GHG reduction potential
General
3
3
Screening
Result
of
1st
12
The activity should be
continuously monitored
whether a real action/ project is
developed because emissions
from electricity use for heating
purposes are large and
switching such users to district
heating system has a big
emission reduction potential.
All 1st screening criteria are
satisfied.
All 1st screening criteria are
satisfied.
The activity should be
continuously monitored
whether a real action/ project is
developed because emissions
from road transport is expected
to increase in Serbia, which has
a big mitigation potential.
Remarks on
1st Screening Analysis
Ministry of Energy, Development and Environmental Protection
Japan International Cooperation Agency
Building
Mitigation action is not
developed into specific
project activity. There is
lack of information on
location and type of
activities.
There is lack of data and
information needed for
Assessment of mitigation
related potential.
There is a general lack of
data and information
necessary for assessment
of mitigation potential.
* Shaded cells indicate the NAMA candidate fulfills a screening criteria.
Replacement of
conventional
65 incandescent light
bulbs with energy
efficient ones
Building
Mitigation action is not
developed into a specific
project activity. There is a
lack of information on
project's overall
characteristics.
Evaluation could not be
conducted (taking into
account the assessment
results for the first two
criteria)
Evaluation could not be
conducted (taking into
account the assessment
results for the first two
criteria)
Evaluation could not be
conducted (taking into
account the assessment
results for the first two
criteria)
There is a general lack of
data and information
necessary for assessment
of mitigation potential.
Timeline
This mitigation action has
not been realized and will
not ensure emission
reduction by 2020.
This mitigation action has
not been realized and will
not ensure emission
reduction by 2020.
This mitigation action has
not been realized and will
not ensure emission
reduction by 2020.
This mitigation action has
not been realized and will
not ensure emission
reduction by 2020.
Evaluation could not be
conducted (taking into
account the assessment
results for the first two
criteria)
Evaluation could not be
conducted (taking into
account the assessment
results for the first two
criteria)
Evaluation could not be
conducted (taking into
account the assessment
results for the first two
criteria)
Evaluation could not be
conducted (taking into
account the assessment
results for the first two
criteria)
Implementing entity is
willing to be a NAMA
implementing entity
according to the
interview.
Voluntary participation
1st Screening
The activity has not
Construction under new
applied to CDM or any
regulation is expected to
other type of carbon
start in 2013.
market scheme yet. The
activity needs to be
monitored to ensure
implementing entity does
not apply to CDM or any
other carbon scheme in
the future.
No double-counting
Mitigation action is not
developed into a specific
project activity. There is a
Automatization for lack of information on
project's overall
63 heating, cooling
characteristics.
and lighting
General information on
how mitigation action will
reduce GHG, how
emission reduction can be
calculated, and what BAU
is available. How to set
BAU needs to be carefully
analyzed if the regulation
is an obligatory regulation.
Information
availability
Evaluation could not be
conducted (taking into
account the assessment
results for the first two
criteria)
Scope and contents of the
mitigation action is clearly
defined. All newly-built
buildings are included.
Distinctiveness
Basic Condition
Mitigation action is not
There is a general lack of
developed into specific
data and information
Improve efficiency project activity. There is a necessary for assessment
of mitigation potential.
in water heating in lack of information on
project's overall
62 residential,
characteristics.
commercial and
public buildings
Construction of
New Energy
Efficient Buildings
61 Based on Energy
Efficiency
Regulation in
Serbia
No.
Promotion of the
use of energy
64 efficient electrical
household
appliances
Building
Building
Public
Building
Subsector
NAMA Title/
Measure to be
Introduced
Republic of Serbia NAMA Long List Evaluation
Although the detail of the action is
not identified, Serbia is promoting
this measure as described in First
Energy Efficiency Plan 2010-2012
and Law on Rational use of Energy
Although the detail of the action is
not identified, Serbia is promoting
this measure as described in First
Energy Efficiency Plan 2010-2012
and Law on Rational use of Energy
Although the detail of the action is
not identified, the First Energy
Efficiency Plan describes the action
as a potentially important
mitigation measure.
Although the detail of the action is
not identified, the First Energy
Efficiency Plan describes the action
as a potentially important
mitigation measure.
Proposed mitigation action is in
line with The first Energy
Efficiency Plan of the Republic of
Serbia for the period from 2010 to
2012; Regulation on energy
efficiency in buildings.
Compliance
Although the detail of the action is
not identified, a potential action will
lead to the reduction of GHG
emission through promoting and
supporting the replacement of
conventional incandescent light
bulbs with energy efficient ones.
Although the detail of the action is
not identified, a potential action will
lead to the reduction of GHG
emission through promoting and
supporting the replacement of old
inefficient appliances with energy
efficient ones.
Although the detail of the action is
not identified, a potential action will
lead to the reduction of GHG
emission through introduction of
energy efficient system.
Although the detail of the action is
not identified, a potential action will
lead to the reduction of GHG
emission through improvement of
efficiency in water heating in
residential, commercial and public
buildings.
GHG emissions reduction will be
achieved through construction of
new buildings based on the new
Regulations on energy efficiency in
buildings in the period 2013 to
2020.
GHG reduction potential
General
3
Screening
Result
of
1st
13
The activity should be
continuously monitored
whether a real action/ project is
developed because emissions
from residential sector
contributes to GHG emissions in
Serbia and improving energy
efficiency in houses has a big
mitigation potential.
The activity should be
continuously monitored
whether a real action/ project is
developed because emissions
from residential sector
contributes to GHG emissions in
Serbia and improving energy
efficiency in houses has a big
mitigation potential.
The action is not analyzed
further because: There is no
concrete action planned in line
with the country's national
policy/ strategy and general
characteristic of the technology/
measure to be introduced is
unknown.
The activity should be
continuously monitored
whether a real action/ project is
developed because emissions
due to building heating
constitute a big part of national
emissions and have a big
reduction potential.
All 1st screening criteria are
satisfied.
Remarks on
1st Screening Analysis
Ministry of Energy, Development and Environmental Protection
Japan International Cooperation Agency
Public and
commercial
services
Public and
commercial
services
Public and
commercial
services
Public and
commercial
services
Subsector
Modernization of
public lighting
systems at
municipalities
Mitigation action is not
developed into a specific
project activity. There is a
lack of information on
project's overall
characteristics.
Distinctiveness
There is lack of data and
information needed for
Assessment of mitigation
related potential.
Mitigation action is not
developed into a specific
project activity. There is a
lack of information on
Promotion of
project's overall
69 energy service
companies (ESCO) characteristics.
* Shaded cells indicate the NAMA candidate fulfills a screening criteria.
Energy Efficiency
Improvements in
Public Buildings: 23
Schools and 26
68 Hospitals –
Serbian Energy
Efficiency Project
(SEEP)
Enough information is
available in order to
analyze how the action
contributes to GHG
emission reduction, how
to calculate the reduction
amount, and what the
BAU scenario is, based on
the result of the previous
two phases of the project
and also energy audit
conducted for the target
buildings.
There is a general lack of
data and information
necessary for assessment
of mitigation potential.
There is a general lack of
data and information
necessary for assessment
of mitigation potential.
Information
availability
Scope and contents of the
mitigation action is clearly
defined including the
location and type of
activities.
Mitigation action is not
developed into a specific
project activity. There is a
lack of information on
project's overall
Setting the energy characteristics.
efficiency as the
67 criterion for best
bid in public
procurement
66
No.
NAMA Title/
Measure to be
Introduced
Republic of Serbia NAMA Long List Evaluation
Evaluation could not be
conducted (taking into
account the assessment
results for the first two
criteria)
The activity has not
applied to CDM or any
other type of carbon
market scheme yet. The
activity needs to be
monitored to ensure
implementing entity does
not apply to CDM or any
other carbon scheme in
the future.
Evaluation could not be
conducted (taking into
account the assessment
results for the first two
criteria)
Evaluation could not be
conducted (taking into
account the assessment
results for the first two
criteria)
No double-counting
Basic Condition
This mitigation action has
not been realized and will
not ensure emission
reduction by 2020.
The design and
construction will start in
2013. And emission
reduction will occur by
2020.
This mitigation action has
not been realized and will
not ensure emission
reduction by 2020.
This mitigation action has
not been realized and will
not ensure emission
reduction by 2020.
Timeline
Evaluation could not be
conducted (taking into
account the assessment
results for the first two
criteria)
Implementing entity is
willing to be a NAMA
implementing entity
according to the
interview.
Evaluation could not be
conducted (taking into
account the assessment
results for the first two
criteria)
Evaluation could not be
conducted (taking into
account the assessment
results for the first two
criteria)
Voluntary participation
1st Screening
Proposed mitigation action is in
line with Energy sector
Development Strategy until 2015,
First Energy Efficiency Plan 20102012 and Law on Rational use of
Energy
This action is an important
mitigation measure is in line with
Serbia's policy described in the
First Energy Efficiency Plan.
Proposed mitigation action is in
line with First Energy Efficiency
Plan 2010- 2012; p22, p36
Proposed mitigation action is in
line with First Energy Efficiency
Plan 2010- 2012; p22, p35
Compliance
Evaluation could not be conducted
(taking into account the
assessment results for the first two
criteria)
GHG emissions reduction will be
achieved through installation of
energy efficient improvement
measures at buildings (e.g. roof,
ceiling and wall insulation, window
replacement etc.)
Although the detail of the action is
not identified, a potential action
may lead to the reduction of GHG
emission through setting the
energy efficiency as the criterion
for best bid in public procurement,
so that all publicly procured goods
and products will have to satisfy
certain standard to energy
efficiency, which is higher than the
current efficiency level. However,
there is no methodology available
to analyze the potential.
Although the detail of the action is
not identified, a potential action will
lead to the reduction of GHG
emission through improvement of
the public lighting system and its
modernization
GHG reduction potential
General
3
Screening
Result
of
1st
14
The action is not analyzed
further because: There is no
concrete action planned in line
with the country's national
policy/ strategy and general
characteristic of the technology/
measure to be introduced is
unknown.
All 1st screening criteria are
satisfied.
The action is not analyzed
further because: There is no
concrete action planned in line
with the country's national
policy/ strategy and general
characteristic of the technology/
measure to be introduced is
unknown.
The action is not analyzed
further because: There is no
concrete action planned in line
with the country's national
policy/ strategy and general
characteristic of the technology/
measure to be introduced is
unknown.
Remarks on
1st Screening Analysis
Ministry of Energy, Development and Environmental Protection
Japan International Cooperation Agency
NAMA Title
Energy
4
3
2
1
Short
List
No.
15
- MRV of the project will be executed in accordance with the international MRV system.
- Assessment of mitigation potential can be carried out based on the approved CDM
methodologies (AM0029 "Baseline Methodology for Grid Connected Electricity Generation
Plants using Natural Gas" and ACM0002 "Consolidated baseline methodology for gridconnected electricity generation from renewable sources")
The activity is considered
- Sufficient and transparent data will be available for MRV during project implementation.
as an appropriate
- Monitoring and reporting will be performed by the implementing entity in accordance with Shortlist mitigation action of
the international MRV system.
Serbia.
Energy
CCGT technology even new for
Although it is difficult for
Serbia is already proven and used
operator to secure finance
by its own, financial analyses in the world.
indicate that this investment
is feasible, i.e. that all
Replacement and
profitability parameters of
Construction of a New
4
Natural Gas Cogeneration the mitigation action are
indicated as positive.
Plant CHP Novi Sad
Modernization and
Capacity and Efficiency
3 Increase of Unit A3 in
Thermal Power Plant
Nikola Tesla
- MRV of the project will be executed in accordance with the international MRV system.
- Assessment of mitigation potential can be carried out based on: 1. approved CDM
methodology (AM0061 “Methodology for rehabilitation and/or energy efficiency
improvement in existing power plants”), 2. a methodology applied in Initial National
The activity is considered
Communication that is based on IPCC
- Sufficient and transparent data will be available for MRV during project implementation. Shortlist as an appropriate
mitigation action of
- Monitoring and reporting will be performed by the implementing entity in accordance with
Serbia.
the international MRV system.
Energy
The operator has already carried
out rehabilitation of the existing
units and thus will not encounter
technical difficulties during
operation.
Although it is difficult for
operator to secure finance
by its own, financial analyses
indicate that this investment
is feasible, i.e. that all
profitability parameters of
the mitigation action are
indicated as positive.
Modernization and
Capacity and Efficiency
2 Increase of Unit B2 in
Thermal Power Plant
Nikola Tesla
- MRV of the project will be executed in accordance with the international MRV system.
- Assessment of mitigation potential can be carried out based on: 1. approved CDM
methodology (AM0061 “Methodology for rehabilitation and/or energy efficiency
improvement in existing power plants”), 2. a methodology applied in Initial National
The activity is considered
Communication that is based on IPCC
- Sufficient and transparent data will be available for MRV during project implementation. Shortlist as an appropriate
mitigation action of
- Monitoring and reporting will be performed by the implementing entity in accordance with
Serbia.
the international MRV system.
Analysis
Remarks on Analysis
MRV
Result
MRVability
- MRV of the project will be executed in accordance with the international MRV system.
- Assessment of mitigation potential can be carried out based on: 1. approved CDM
methodology (ACM0013 “Consolidated baseline and monitoring methodology for new grid
connected fossil fuel fired power plants using a less GHG intensive technology”), 2. a
methodology applied in Initial National Communication that is based on IPCC, and 3. J-MRV
The activity is considered
- Sufficient and transparent data will be available for MRV during project implementation.
as an appropriate
- Monitoring and reporting will be performed by the implementing entity in accordance with Shortlist
mitigation action of
the international MRV system.
Serbia.
2nd Screening
Ministry of Energy, Development and Environmental Protection, Republic of Serbia
Japan International Cooperation Agency
The operator has already carried
out rehabilitation of the existing
units and thus will not encounter
technical difficulties during
operation.
Sustainability
Financial Feasibility
Technical Viability
The project will introduce ultra
Although the initial
investment cost is large and super-critical steam power
generation technology. Since the
it is difficult for Serbian
experience in operation of subimplementing entity to
critical plant can be used in
secure finance on its own,
Construction of a 790 MW
NAMA, it is expected that
the mitigation action is
Ultra Supercritical Lignite
1
financially feasible and can sufficient human resources for
Power Plant
be operated in a sustainable operation and maintenance of the
TPP Nikola Tesla - Unit B3
plant can be found in Serbia but
manner.
need to be trained by plant
supplier.
Long
List
No.
Although it is difficult for
operator to secure finance
by its own, financial analyses
indicate that this investment
is feasible, i.e. that all
profitability parameters of
the mitigation action are
indicated as positive.
Energy
Subsector
Republic of Serbia NAMA Long List Evaluation
NAMA Title
Construction of 9 New
7 Small Hydropower Plants
(HPPs) in Serbia
Introduction of Metering
System and Billing on the
15 Basis of Measured
Consumption in District
Heating Systems in Serbia
Introduction 1000 MW of
24 Small Biomass Boilers in
Serbia
Energy
Energy
- MRV of the project will be executed in accordance with the international MRV system.
- Assessment of mitigation potential can be conducted based on: 1) General calculation
method as used in Initial National Communication, and 2) Japan MRV guideline J-MRV002
“Project which improve energy efficiency of equipment”, both of which are based on IPCC
The activity is considered
guideline.
as an appropriate
- Sufficient and transparent data will be available for MRV during project implementation. Shortlist
mitigation action of
- Monitoring and reporting will be performed by the implementing entity in accordance with
Serbia.
the international MRV system.
- MRV of the program will be executed in accordance with the international MRV system.
- Assessment of mitigation potential can be conducted based on: 1) approved CDM
methodology (AMS-I.C. "Thermal energy production with or without electricity"), or 2.
General calculation method based on Serbia's regulation "Regulation on energy efficiency in
buildings (August 2011)."
- Sufficient and transparent data will be available for MRV during project implementation.
- Detailed monitoring and reporting plan will be established once the target boiler owners Shortlist
are identified. Both monitoring and reporting will be performed by the responsible entity
and checked by the implementing entity in accordance with the international MRV system.
Mitigation action will use already
proven technology and pilot
projects of heat consumption
metering by consumers and
billing on the basis of real
consumption have been
undergoing in Belgrade.
Mitigation action will introduce
common boiler technology. Also
the action will use pellets and
wood chip as in input for biomass
boilers. Although these biomass
fuels have not been commonly
used in Serbia, such fuels will be
procured from the market and
boiler owners do not need to
have special technical experience
to operate and maintain the
boiler.
Result of preliminary
financial analysis shows
potential annual fuel savings
of 61 million EUR and simple
payback period 3.5 years.
Financial source has not
been identified yet.
Although the investment
cost is large, preliminary
financial analysis indicates
the program as a whole is
financially feasible. Detailed
analysis on each boiler
installation activity will be
performed upon
identification of actual target
sites.
8
7
6
5
Short
List
No.
16
The activity is considered
as an appropriate
mitigation action of
Serbia.
- MRV of the project will be executed in accordance with the international MRV system.
- Assessments of mitigation potential can be carried out based on: 1) approved CDM
methodology (AMS-I.D. Grid connected renewable electricity generation), or 2) a
methodology applied in Initial National Communication that is based on IPCC
The activity is considered
- Sufficient and transparent data will be available for MRV during project implementation.
- Monitoring and reporting will be performed by the implementing entity in accordance with Shortlist as an appropriate
mitigation action of
the international MRV system.
Serbia.
Technology has already been
widely applied in Serbia and thus
the activity will not encounter
technical difficulties during
operation. Sufficient human
resources for operation and
maintenance of the plants can
also be found in Serbia.
Analysis
Remarks on Analysis
MRV
Result
MRVability
- MRV of the project will be executed in accordance with the international MRV system.
- Assessments of mitigation potential can be carried out based on at least the following
approaches: 1) approved CDM methodology ACM0013 “Consolidated baseline and
monitoring methodology for new grid connected fossil fuel fired power plants using a less
GHG intensive technology” Version 04.0.0; 2) a methodology applied in Initial National
Communication that is based on IPCC, and 3) J-MRV Guideline J-MRV0004 “Fossil fuel fired
The activity is considered
power generation projects introducing low-carbon technology”
as an appropriate
- Sufficient and transparent data will be available for MRV during project implementation. Shortlist mitigation action of
- Monitoring and reporting will be performed by the implementing entity in accordance with
Serbia.
the international MRV system.
2nd Screening
Ministry of Energy, Development and Environmental Protection, Republic of Serbia
Japan International Cooperation Agency
Simple payback period of the
program (which covers all
target hydro power plants)
indicates the mitigation
action is financially feasible.
Sustainability
Financial Feasibility
Technical Viability
The project will introduce superAlthough it is difficult for
critical steam power generation
operator to secure finance
by its own, financial analyses technology. Since the operation
indicate that this investment of a super-critical power plant is
not significantly different from
is feasible, i.e. that all
profitability parameters such that of sub-critical plant, which is
a conventional type in Serbia,
as IRR and cost-benefit
Construction of a Super5
sufficient human resources for
critical Lignite Power Plant analysis result of the
operation and maintenance of the
mitigation action are
plant can be found in Serbia but
indicated as positive.
need to be trained by plant
supplier.
Long
List
No.
Energy
Energy
Subsector
Republic of Serbia NAMA Long List Evaluation
Rehabilitation of Arterial
Roads in Serbia
Rehabilitation of Regional
Roads in Serbia
53
54
Transport
17
- MRV of the project will be executed in accordance with the international MRV system.
- Assessments of mitigation potential is conducted based on methodologies shown in
COPERT 4 that is based on 2006 IPCC Guidelines as well as in "Reducing Carbon Emissions
from Transport Projects," an Evaluation Study by Asian Development Bank.
The activity is considered
- Sufficient and transparent data including traffic volume and fuel consumption by each
as an appropriate
Shortlist
vehicle type will be available for MRV.
mitigation action of
- Monitoring and reporting will be performed by the implementing entity in accordance with
Serbia.
the international MRV system.
- MRV of the project will be executed in accordance with the international MRV system.
Mitigation action will use
technology that have been widely - Assessments of mitigation potential is conducted based on methodologies shown in
applied in road network in Serbia. COPERT 4 that is based on 2006 IPCC Guidelines as well as in "Reducing Carbon Emissions
The activity is considered
from Transport Projects," an Evaluation Study by Asian Development Bank.
as an appropriate
- Sufficient and transparent data including traffic volume and fuel consumption by each
Shortlist
mitigation action of
vehicle type will be available for MRV.
Serbia.
- Monitoring and reporting will be performed by the implementing entity in accordance with
the international MRV system.
Mitigation action will use
Although the total
technology that have been widely
investment cost is very
large, program analysis and applied in road network in Serbia.
financial analysis concludes
that the justification of the
investment in the set of
actions is confirmed.
Although the total
investment cost is large,
program analysis and
financial analysis concludes
that the justification of the
investment in the set of
actions is confirmed.
- MRV of the program will be executed in accordance with the international MRV system.
- Assessment of mitigation potential can be conducted based on the approved CDM
methodology (AMS-III.S. "Introduction of low-emission vehicles/ technologies to
commercial vehicle fleets").
- Sufficient and transparent data will be available for MRV during project implementation. Remains
- Monitoring and reporting will be performed by the implementing entity in accordance with in Long
the international MRV system.
List
The mitigation action will
introduce EURO V, VI or EEV
emission standard diesel engines,
and it will requires construction of
new maintenance facilities. The
implementing entity has sufficient
experience and capacity to
operate and maintain the new
buses.
The mitigation action is
considered to be financially
non-feasible because of the
relatively small fuel saving
Switching of old buses and and large investment cost.
energy efficiency
52
improvement in Belgrade
and Pancevo
The activity will be
continuously monitored
whether there is any change
in the proposed project that
may increase financial
feasibility up to the level the
implementing entity
considers the investment is
acceptable.
- MRV of the project will be executed in accordance with the international MRV system.
- Assessments of mitigation potential can be conducted based on a methodology applied in
Initial National Communication that is based on IPCC.
The activity is considered
- Sufficient and transparent data will be available for MRV during project implementation.
- Monitoring and reporting will be performed by the implementing entity in accordance with Shortlist as an appropriate
mitigation action of
the international MRV system.
Serbia.
This mitigation action will use
mainly waste heat recovery
technology. Implementing entity
has an experience in using similar
technology before. (to be further
analyzed)
Financial analysis indicates
all profitability parameters
are positive. Detailed
Using of Waste Heat from financial analysis still needs
Power Plant for Heating
to be further analyzed upon
28
the City of Belgrade,
feasibility study completion.
Serbia
NAMA Title
12
11
-
10
9
Short
List
No.
Ministry of Energy, Development and Environmental Protection, Republic of Serbia
Japan International Cooperation Agency
2nd Screening
Analysis
Sustainability
Remarks on Analysis
MRV
Result
Financial Feasibility
Technical Viability
MRVability
- MRV of the project will be executed in accordance with the international MRV system.
Solar collector technology for
Financial analysis in the
water heating has been applied to - Assessments of mitigation potential can be conducted based on a methodology in 2006
Feasibility Study indicates
many countries and the Serbian IPCC Guidelines.
the project is at the
The activity is considered
Use of Solar Energy for
- Sufficient and transparent data will be available for MRV during project implementation.
implementing entity has an
acceptable level for
Domestic Hot Water
- Monitoring and reporting will be performed by the implementing entity in accordance with Shortlist as an appropriate
experience of installing and
implementing entity.
26
mitigation action of
Production in Heating Plant
operating the same technology, the international MRV system.
Serbia.
Cerak in Belgrade
although the size is smaller than
the project.
Long
List
No.
Transport
Transport
Energy
Energy
Subsector
Republic of Serbia NAMA Long List Evaluation
NAMA Title
Building
Building
Energy Efficiency
Improvements in Public
Buildings: 23 Schools and
68 26 Hospitals –
Serbian Energy Efficiency
Project (SEEP)
Construction of New
Energy Efficient Buildings
61
Based on Energy Efficiency
Regulation in Serbia
Building
Financial analysis indicates
all profitability parameters
are positive. Detailed
financial analysis will be
available upon feasibility
study completion.
Preliminary financial analysis
indicates the mitigation
action is feasible as the
simple payback period of the
project is within acceptable
level for the implementing
entity.
Preliminary financial analysis
indicates the mitigation
action is feasible as the
simple payback period of the
project is within acceptable
level for the implementing
entity.
- MRV of the program will be executed in accordance with the domestic MRV system, which
is yet to be established.
- If some new buildings are installed with thermal insulation measures that achieve more
than energy efficiency standard required by the regulation, MRV of such actions will be
executed in accordance with international MRV system.
- Assessment of mitigation potential can be conducted based on the methodology specified
in Serbia's regulation "Regulation on energy efficiency in buildings (August 2011)," or
The activity is considered
approved CDM methodology (AMS-II.E. "Energy efficiency and fuel switching measures for
as an appropriate
buildings").
Shortlist
mitigation action of
- A robust monitoring plan needs to be established in order to obtain sufficient and
Serbia.
transparent data for MRV during project implementation. Project emission data may include
type of energy efficiency improvement measures and expected fuel saving effect, type of
fuels used, etc. It may also be necessary albeit difficult to monitor whether all new
buildings comply new regulation.
- Monitoring and reporting will be performed by the implementing entity in accordance with
the domestic MRV system.
The mitigation activity will involve
installation of basic and widelyused insulation measures such as
the ones for walls, partitions,
roofs, ceilings, as well as
replacement of windows.
16
15
14
13
Short
List
No.
18
The mitigation action will involve - MRV of the project will be executed in accordance with the international MRV system.
- This mitigation action will be able to be measured by using the same original
installation of rather simple
methodology applied to former phases. Application of approved CDM methodology will be
energy efficiency improvement
measures to buildings, which are further analyzed and identified.
The activity is considered
already used in the former phases Also, reporting system has been established during the previous phases, which can be
as an appropriate
Shortlist
applied to proposed mitigation project.
of the project and the
mitigation action of
achievement has been monitored - Sufficient and transparent data will be available for MRV during project implementation.
Serbia.
- Monitoring and reporting will be performed by the implementing entity in accordance with
as well.
the international MRV system.
- MRV of the program will be executed in accordance with the international MRV system.
- Assessment of mitigation potential can be conducted based on the approved CDM
methodology (AMS-II.E. "Energy efficiency and fuel switching measures for buildings") or a
methodology specified in Serbia's regulation "Regulation on energy efficiency in buildings
(August 2011)."
The activity is considered
- Depending on the methodology (and the extent the methodology requires for acquisition
as an appropriate
Shortlist
of data and parameter), a robust monitoring plan needs to be established in order to
mitigation action of
obtain sufficient and transparent data for MRV during project implementation. Baseline
Serbia.
data may include type of fuels currently used and fuel consumption by each fuel type at
each building.
- Monitoring and reporting will be performed by the implementing entity in accordance with
the international MRV system.
Analysis
Remarks on Analysis
MRV
Result
MRVability
- MRV of the program will be executed in accordance with the international MRV system.
- Assessment of mitigation potential can be conducted based on the approved CDM
methodology (AMS-II.B. "Supply side energy efficiency improvements – generation," or
AM0058 "Introduction of a new primary district heating system").
The activity is considered
- Detailed baseline data, including type of fuels currently used and fuel consumption by
as an appropriate
Shortlist
each fuel type needs to be identified and obtained for more accurate estimation.
mitigation action of
- Sufficient and transparent data will be available for MRV during project implementation.
Serbia.
- Monitoring and reporting will be performed by the implementing entity in accordance with
the international MRV system.
2nd Screening
Ministry of Energy, Development and Environmental Protection, Republic of Serbia
Japan International Cooperation Agency
The mitigation activity will involve
installation of basic and widelyused insulation measures such as
the ones for walls, partitions,
roofs, ceilings, as well as
replacement of windows.
Sustainability
Financial Feasibility
Technical Viability
Preliminary financial analysis The mitigation activity will involve
indicates the simple payback construction of hot water
distribution network system and
period of the project is
substation, both of which the
within acceptable level for
implementing entity has sufficient
the implementing entity.
Expansion of Existing
58
experience in construction,
Heating Network in Valjevo
operation and maintenance.
Long
List
No.
Improvement of Old
Residential Buildings
59 Envelope (exterior doors,
windows and thermal
insulation) in Serbia
Building
Subsector
Republic of Serbia NAMA Long List Evaluation
ῧ௜㈨ᩱ㸵 NAMA ࣏࣮ࢺࣇ࢛ࣜ࢜
NATIONALLY APPROPRIATE MITIGATION ACTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA
Construction of a 790 MW Ultra Supercritical Lignite Power Plant
TPP Nikola Tesla -Unit B3
The NAMA involves construction of a new lignite fired thermal power plant in TPP Nikola Tesla. The new unit, called Unit B3,
will have an installed capacity of 790 MWe with net efficiency § 43%, which is significantly higher than the efficiency of a
conventional lignite power plant in Serbia. The project will introduce an ultra-supercritical steam power generation
technology. The NAMA will contribute to climate change mitigation as the new more efficient power plant will emit less GHGs
than that from the conventional inefficient lignite power plants.
Type of Action
Project
Boundary and Location
Near the town Skela and Usce, along the river Sava,
59 km upstream from Belgrade,
Obrenovac municipality
BAU Scenario
Exiting conventional lignite power plants continue
operation at the current efficiency of about 25%.
New thermal power plants will incorporate a
conventional subcritical technology with efficiency of
37%, instead of a more energy-efficient
ultra-supercritical technology.
Mitigation Target
Efficiency of a lignite power plant is advanced to
around 43% by introducing an ultra- supercritical
steam technology.
Mitigation Potential
Type of GHGs reduced: CO2
Annual reduction: 1,337,728 tCO2e
Total reduction: 40,131,830 tCO2e (30 years)
Methodology applied for estimation:
based on the approved CDM methodology ACM0013
MRV
Contribution to Sustainable Development
Efficient use of domestic fuel sources and reduction
of dependence on fuel import
Increase in competitiveness on international market
Creation of local employment opportunities
Finance and Cost
Total Investment Cost: EUR 1,200,000,000
Financial sources: Serbian implementing entity
(EPS) would provide up to 30% of the investment
IRR: available by March 2013
Current Status and Schedule
Current Status
Pre-Feasibility Study completed
Expected starting date of Action
Construction starts in 2017; operation starts in 2020
Lifetime
30 years
Implementing Entity and Contact Information
Entity Name
Contact Person
Title
Phone
E-mail
Public Enterprise Electric Power
Industry of Serbia (EPS)
Mr. Mihajlo Gavric
Manager of Environmental Protection
Sector
+381-11-39-73-013
[email protected]
In accordance with international MRV system
Ministry of Energy, Development, and
Environmental Protection, Republic of Serbia
http://www.ekoplan.gov.rs/en/index.php
Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA)
http://www.jica.go.jp/english/index.html
1
NAMA Coordinating Entity
Ministry of Energy, Development, and Environmental Protection
Climate Change Division
State Secretary: Mr. Vladan Zdravkovic
Head of Climate Change Division: Ms. Danijela Bozanic
Tel:
+381-11-3131-355
Fax:
+381-11-3131-355
Email: [email protected]
NATIONALLY APPROPRIATE MITIGATION ACTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA
Modernization and Capacity and Efficiency Increase
of Unit B2 in Thermal Power Plant Nikola Tesla B
The NAMA involves rehabilitation and modernization of a lignite thermal power plant with capacity increase of 47 MW.
Adopted technologies include rehabilitation and modernization of the steam turbine, condensing plant and cooling system
unit, boiler and auxiliary equipment (e.g. feed water heaters), as well as revitalization and improvement of the firing system
and the combustion process by introducing "Low NOx" burners and increasing the efficiency of the old thermal units.
The NAMA will contribute to climate change mitigation through increasing energy efficiency of the existing lignite-fired
power plant.
Type of Action
Project
Boundary and Location
Near the town Skela and Usce, along the river Sava,
59 km upstream from Belgrade, Obrenovac
municipality, Republic of Serbia
BAU Scenario
The thermal power plant continues operation and its
efficiency remains 31% (not improved) and is
decreased overtime
Mitigation Target
Modernization measures are applied and overall
efficiency is improved from 31% to projected 34%
Mitigation Potential
Type of GHGs reduced: CO2
Annual reduction: 355,142 tCO2e
Total reduction: 5,327,130 tCO2e (15 years)
Methodology applied for estimation:
based on the approved CDM methodology
MRV
Contribution to Sustainable Development
Efficient use of domestic fuel sources
Reduction of air pollutants
Achievement of higher proficiency of employees
Finance and Cost
Total Investment Cost: EUR 22,716,750
Financial sources: Serbian implementing entity
and commercial credit
Internal Rate of Return: 33.17%
NPV: 22,210,199
Current Status and Schedule
Current Status
Feasibility Study with Idea Design for the project
under development
Expected starting date of Action
Commissioning of the unit planned for 2013
Lifetime
15 years
Implementing Entity and Contact Information
Entity Name
Contact Person
Title
In accordance with international MRV system
Phone
E-mail
Ministry of Energy, Development, and
Environmental Protection, Republic of Serbia
http://www.ekoplan.gov.rs/en/index.php
Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA)
http://www.jica.go.jp/english/index.html
2
Public Enterprise Electric Power
Industry of Serbia (EPS)
Mr. Mihajlo Gavric
Manager of Environmental Protection
Sector
+381-11-39-73-013
[email protected]
NAMA Coordinating Entity
Ministry of Energy, Development, and Environmental Protection
Climate Change Division
State Secretary: Mr. Vladan Zdravkovic
Head of Climate Change Division: Ms. Danijela Bozanic
Tel:
+381-11-3131-355
Fax:
+381-11-3131-355
Email: [email protected]
NATIONALLY APPROPRIATE MITIGATION ACTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA
Modernization and Capacity and Efficiency Increase of Unit A3
in Thermal Power Plant Nikola Tesla A
The NAMA involves rehabilitation and modernization of a lignite thermal power plant with capacity increase of 30 MW.
Adopted technologies are rehabilitation and modernization of the steam turbine, condensing plant and cooling system unit,
boiler and auxiliary equipment (e.g. feed water heaters), as well as revitalization and improvement of the firing system and
the combustion process by introducing "Low NOx" burners and increasing the efficiency of the old thermal units. The NAMA
will contribute to climate change mitigation through increasing energy efficiency of the existing lignite-fired power plant.
Type of Action
Contribution to Sustainable Development
Project
Reduction of dependence on fuel import
Reduction of air pollutants
Creation of local employment opportunities
Boundary and Location
Power plant is located on the right bank of river Sava,
30 km upstream Belgrade, near the city of Obrenovac
BAU Scenario
The thermal power plant continues operation and its
efficiency remains 31% (not improved) and is
decreased overtime
Finance and Cost
Total Investment Cost: EUR 30.5 million
Financial sources: Serbian implementing entity
(loan or equity; to be decided)
Financial analyses yielded positive result. Detailed
information available upon request
Current Status and Schedule
Mitigation Target
Modernization measures are applied and overall
efficiency is improved from 31% to projected 33%
Mitigation Potential
Type of GHGs reduced: CO2
Annual reduction: 91,796 tCO2e
Total reduction: 1,376,940 tCO2e (15 years)
Methodology applied for estimation:
based on the approved CDM methodology
Current Status
Feasibility Study with Idea Design for the project
under development
Expected starting date of Action
Commissioning of the unit planned for 2013
Lifetime
15 years
Implementing Entity and Contact Information
Entity Name
MRV
In accordance with international MRV system
Contact Person
Title
Phone
E-mail
Ministry of Energy, Development, and
Environmental Protection, Republic of Serbia
http://www.ekoplan.gov.rs/en/index.php
Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA)
http://www.jica.go.jp/english/index.html
3
Public Enterprise Electric Power
Industry of Serbia (EPS)
Mr. Mihajlo Gavric
Manager of Environmental Protection
Sector
+381-11-39-73-013
[email protected]
NAMA Coordinating Entity
Ministry of Energy, Development, and Environmental Protection
Climate Change Division
State Secretary: Mr. Vladan Zdravkovic
Head of Climate Change Division: Ms. Danijela Bozanic
Tel:
+381-11-3131-355
Fax:
+381-11-3131-355
Email: [email protected]
NATIONALLY APPROPRIATE MITIGATION ACTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA
Replacement and Construction of
a New Natural Gas Cogeneration Plant CHP Novi Sad
The NAMA involves construction of a new, energy efficient natural gas-fired cogeneration plant that will entirely replace the
existing inefficient cogeneration plant, which is also fueled by natural gas and heavy oil. The existing cogeneration plant will
be decommissioned when the new plant starts operation. The new cogeneration plant will generate 450 MWe of electricity,
which will be supplied to the national grid of Serbia, while the plant will also generate 300 MWth of heat, which will be
supplied to district heating plants of Novi Sad municipality through a pumping station.
The NAMA will contribute to climate change mitigation as 1) the new more efficient cogeneration plant will replace the
existing inefficient plant for heat supply for district heating, and 2) it will replace fuel consumption at grid-connected thermal
power plants, which are mainly fueled by carbon-intensive lignite.
Type of Action
Project
Boundary and Location
In the outskirts of the city of Novi Sad at the site of
old CHP plant, Autonomous province of Vojvodina
BAU Scenario
Inefficient cogeneration plant continues operation
with the current and decreasing efficiency
Grid-connected thermal power plants will continue
operation and supply the equivalent amount of
electricity that would be generated by the new
cogeneration plant
Mitigation Target
Installation of a new 450 MWe/ 300 MWth
high-efficient natural gas fired combined cycle
(CCGT) heat and power generation plant
Mitigation Potential
Type of GHGs reduced: CO2
Annual reduction: 1,019,380 tCO2e
Total reduction: 35,678,300 tCO2e (35 years)
Methodology applied for estimation:
based on the approved CDM methodology
MRV
Contribution to Sustainable Development
Improvement of efficient use of fuel sources
Reduction of impact on environment
Creation of local employment opportunities
Finance and Cost
Total Investment Cost: EUR 250 million
Financial sources: 51% by strategic partner, 49%
by Serbian implementing entity
Financial analyses yielded positive result. Detailed
information available upon request
Current Status and Schedule
Current Status
Prefeasibility Study with General Design completed
Expected starting date of Action
Commissioning planned for 2015
Lifetime
35 years
Implementing Entity and Contact Information
Entity Name
Contact Person
Title
Phone
E-mail
Public Enterprise Electric Power
Industry of Serbia (EPS)
Mr. Mihajlo Gavric
Manager of Environmental Protection
Sector
+381-11-39-73-013
[email protected]
In accordance with international MRV system
Ministry of Energy, Development, and
Environmental Protection, Republic of Serbia
http://www.ekoplan.gov.rs/en/index.php
Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA)
http://www.jica.go.jp/english/index.html
4
NAMA Coordinating Entity
Ministry of Energy, Development, and Environmental Protection
Climate Change Division
State Secretary: Mr. Vladan Zdravkovic
Head of Climate Change Division: Ms. Danijela Bozanic
Tel:
+381-11-3131-355
Fax:
+381-11-3131-355
Email: [email protected]
NATIONALLY APPROPRIATE MITIGATION ACTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA
Construction of a Super-Critical Lignite Power Plant
TPP Kostolac B
The NAMA involves construction of a new lignite fired thermal power plant in TPP Kostolac B. The new unit, called block B3,
will have an installed capacity of 600 MWe (547 MW at TPP threshold) with net efficiency of 40.8%, which is significantly
higher than efficiency of a conventional lignite power plant in Serbia. The project will introduce a super-critical steam power
generation technology. The NAMA will contribute to climate change mitigation as the new more efficient power plant will
emit less GHGs than that from the conventional inefficient lignite power plants.
Type of Action
Project
Boundary and Location
Located by river Mlava in the village Drmno, near the
city of Kostolac, municipality of Pozarevac
BAU Scenario
Exiting conventional lignite power plants continue
operation (not improved).
Newly-constructed thermal power plants will
incorporate a conventional technology, instead of a
more energy-efficient supercritical technology
Contribution to Sustainable Development
Reduction of dependence on fuel import
Increase of competitiveness
Achievement of higher proficiency of employees
Finance and Cost
Total Investment Cost: EUR 954 million
Financial sources: N/A
Financial analyses yielded positive result. Detailed
information available upon request
Current Status and Schedule
Current Status
Prefeasibility study and General Design completed
Mitigation Target
Efficiency of a lignite power plant is advanced to
around 40% by introducing supercritical steam
technology
Expected starting date of Action
Construction starts in 2015; operation starts in 2020
Lifetime
40 years
Mitigation Potential
Implementing Entity and Contact Information
Type of GHGs reduced: CO2
Annual reduction: 1,390,533 tCO2e
Total reduction: 55,621,320 tCO2e (40 years)
Methodology applied for estimation:
based on the approved CDM methodology
MRV
Entity Name
Contact Person
Title
Phone
E-mail
Public Enterprise Electric Power
Industry of Serbia (EPS)
Mr. Mihajlo Gavric
Manager of Environmental Protection
Sector
+381-11-39-73-013
[email protected]
In accordance with international MRV system
Ministry of Energy, Development, and
Environmental Protection, Republic of Serbia
http://www.ekoplan.gov.rs/en/index.php
Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA)
http://www.jica.go.jp/english/index.html
5
NAMA Coordinating Entity
Ministry of Energy, Development, and Environmental Protection
Climate Change Division
State Secretary: Mr. Vladan Zdravkovic
Head of Climate Change Division: Ms. Danijela Bozanic
Tel:
+381-11-3131-355
Fax:
+381-11-3131-355
Email: [email protected]
NATIONALLY APPROPRIATE MITIGATION ACTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA
Construction of 9 New Small Hydropower Plants (HPPs) in Serbia
The NAMA involves construction of new small scale HPPs (9 units with total installed capacity 30.4 MW and possible
electricity production over 108 GWh/year).
The NAMA will contribute to climate change mitigation as the hydro power plants do not emit any GHG emissions, and
reduce GHG that would otherwise be emitted from grid-connected power plants in the absence of the mitigation action.
Type of Action
Project
Boundary and Location
Nationwide in Serbia
BAU Scenario
New small HPPs (9 plants) are not constructed and
instead grid-connected power plants, mainly thermal
power plants, continue operation and supply
electricity.
Contribution to Sustainable Development
Utilization of renewable energy sources
Reduction of impact on environment
Creation of local employment opportunities
Awareness raising among general public about clean
energy
Finance and Cost
Total Investment Cost: EUR 54.684 million
Financial sources: Serbian implementing entity
equity and loan
Simple payback period: 12 years
FIRR: 1.3% - 30.9%
Mitigation Target
Construction of 9 new small HPPs which will produce
electricity without GHG emission.
Mitigation Potential
Type of GHGs reduced: CO2
Annual reduction: 102,343 tCO2e
Total reduction: 4,093,720 t CO2e (40 years)
Methodology applied for estimation:
approved CDM methodology AMS-I.D.
MRV
In accordance with international MRV system
Current Status and Schedule
Current Status
For 6 HP plants project documentation is completed
and for the remaining 3 is under development.
Expected starting date of Action
Construction starts in 2013 and operation starts from
2014 and continues till 2016
Lifetime
40 years
Implementing Entity and Contact Information
Entity Name
Contact Person
Title
Phone
E-mail
Ministry of Energy, Development, and
Environmental Protection, Republic of Serbia
http://www.ekoplan.gov.rs/en/index.php
Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA)
http://www.jica.go.jp/english/index.html
6
Public Enterprise Electric Power
Industry of Serbia (EPS)
Mr. Mihajlo Gavric
Manager of Environmental Protection
Sector
+381-11-39-73-013
[email protected]
NAMA Coordinating Entity
Ministry of Energy, Development, and Environmental Protection
Climate Change Division
State Secretary: Mr. Vladan Zdravkovic
Head of Climate Change Division: Ms. Danijela Bozanic
Tel:
+381-11-3131-355
Fax:
+381-11-3131-355
Email: [email protected]
NATIONALLY APPROPRIATE MITIGATION ACTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA
Introduction of Metering System and Billing on the Basis of
Measured Consumption in District Heating Systems in Serbia
Almost all residential consumers connected to the district heating (DH) network in Serbia are paying their bill based on the
floor size, instead of the actual amount of heat consumption. This billing system has prevented consumers from having
energy saving mindset. The NAMA involves installation of devices that allow metering of heat consumption by each
consumer, which is a necessary prerequisite for billing on the basis of actual heat consumption.
Measures to be introduced include heat allocators with radio modem, thermostatic radiator valves as well as rehabilitation of
50% of existing substations in Serbia (approximately 12,500 substations) and installation of heat meters, automatic control,
pumps with integrated frequency converters, plate heat exchangers, valves, etc. The NAMA will contribute to climate change
mitigation through reducing the consumption of heat at residential sector, which is generated by fossil fuels.
Type of Action
Program
Boundary and Location
55 towns that have district heating system
BAU Scenario
Heat billing system will not change from the current
system, which is based on the floor size instead of
the actual amount of heat used
Users consume heat at the current level as the billing
system remains same
Mitigation Target
Reduction of heat consumption by 20% in residential
buildings connected to DH system
Contribution to Sustainable Development
Efficient use of domestic and import energy sources
Education and awareness raise of consumers about
benefits and technical possibilities of energy saving
Development of heat billing methodology
Creation of local employment opportunities
Finance and Cost
Total Investment Cost: EUR 212 million
Financial sources: N/A
Simple payback period: 3.5 years
Current Status and Schedule
Current Status
Several pilot projects ongoing
Expected starting date of Action
Installation complete by 2016
Mitigation Potential
Type of GHGs reduced: CO2
Annual reduction: 329,117 tCO2e
Total reduction: 6,582,340 tCO2e (20 years)
Methodology applied for estimation:
methodology used in Initial National Communication
of Serbia, which is based on IPCC Guidelines
MRV
Lifetime
20 years
Implementing Entity and Contact Information
Entity Name
Public Utility Company District Heating
Plants of Belgrade and Association of
Serbian District Heating Company
Contact Person
Title
Mr. Petar Vasiljevic
General Manager Assistant,
Belgrade district heating company
+381-11-20-93-392
[email protected]
In accordance with international MRV system
Phone
E-mail
Ministry of Energy, Development, and
Environmental Protection, Republic of Serbia
http://www.ekoplan.gov.rs/en/index.php
Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA)
http://www.jica.go.jp/english/index.html
7
NAMA Coordinating Entity
Ministry of Energy, Development, and Environmental Protection
Climate Change Division
State Secretary: Mr. Vladan Zdravkovic
Head of Climate Change Division: Ms. Danijela Bozanic
Tel:
+381-11-3131-355
Fax:
+381-11-3131-355
Email: [email protected]
NATIONALLY APPROPRIATE MITIGATION ACTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA
Introduction 1000 MW of Small Biomass Boilers in Serbia
Serbia has abundant biomass resources throughout the country, which is estimated to be more than 100,000 TJ/ year
(40,000 TJ/ year for wood waste and 68,000 TJ/ year for agricultural waste). This NAMA aims to install 1000 MW of new
biomass boilers for all residential, commercial, and industrial sectors throughout the country that will be fueled by either
wood waste (pellets or wood chips) or agricultural waste. Climate change mitigation will be achieved through replacing the
existing small inefficient boilers that are fuelled mainly by carbon-intensive coal, oil, and grid electricity.
Type of Action
Program
Boundary and Location
Throughout the country
BAU Scenario
Existing boilers will continue operation and be fueled
by the same carbon-intensive energy sources
Mitigation Target
Installation of 1000 MW of biomass boilers
Mitigation Potential
Type of GHGs reduced: CO2
Annual reduction: 414,501 tCO2e
Total reduction: 10,362,525 tCO2e (25 years)
Methodology applied for estimation:
Approved CDM methodology AMS-I.I.
Finance and Cost
Total Investment Cost: EUR 250 million
Financial sources: financial support from Annex I
countries and international organizations through
NAMA scheme
Simple pay-back period: 6.9 years
IRR: 12.9%
NPV: EUR 88 million
Current Status and Schedule
Current Status
Location of boilers to be replaced will be identified
Pilot projects of biomass boiler installation ongoing
Expected starting date of Action
Installation will start in 2015 and operation will start
continuously. The installation can be finished in 2019
Lifetime
25 years
Implementing Entity and Contact Information
MRV
Entity Name
In accordance with international MRV system
Contact Person
Title
Contribution to Sustainable Development
Efficient use of domestic sources
Creation of local employment opportunities
Improvement of local environmental condition
Ministry of Energy, Development, and
Environmental Protection, Republic of Serbia
http://www.ekoplan.gov.rs/en/index.php
Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA)
http://www.jica.go.jp/english/index.html
8
Phone
E-mail
Ministry of Energy, Development and
Environmental Protection
Predrag Milanovic
Advisor in the Department for
Renewable Energy
+381-11-3346-755
[email protected]
NAMA Coordinating Entity
Ministry of Energy, Development, and Environmental Protection
Climate Change Division
State Secretary: Mr. Vladan Zdravkovic
Head of Climate Change Division: Ms. Danijela Bozanic
Tel:
+381-11-3131-355
Fax:
+381-11-3131-355
Email: [email protected]
NATIONALLY APPROPRIATE MITIGATION ACTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA
Use of Solar Energy for Domestic Hot Water Production
in Heating Plant “Cerak” in Belgrade
Heating plant Cerak currently uses natural gas to produce and deliver heat for space heating and domestic hot water
to residential and non-residential customers in Belgrade municipalities, Cukarica and Rakovica. The NAMA involves
installation of solar collectors to replace a part of the hot water generation, amounting for around 2,700 MWh which is
supplied to 7,000 households. The action will introduce approximately 5,000 m2 of solar collectors, hot water storage
tank, heat exchanger, expansion vessel, pumps, valves, automatic control, and connect a new solar plant with the
existing heating plant.
Type of Action
Contribution to Sustainable Development
Project
Saving fossil fuel consumption
Creation of local employment opportunities
Boundary and Location
Finance and Cost
Heat plant is located in the area of Cerak that is in
one of central municipalities of Belgrade, Cukarica.
Municipality of Rakovica is located next to Cukarica.
Heat and domestic hot water are delivered to the
customers in Cularica and Rakovica
Total Investment Cost: EUR 1.05 million
Financial sources: N/A
Simple pay-back period: 8.7 years
Current Status and Schedule
BAU Scenario
Natural gas will be continuously used throughout the
year for domestic hot water production
Mitigation Target
Reduction of fossil fuels consumption and GHG
emission in Heat plant “Cerak” in Belgrade
Current Status
Feasibility study completed in 2008
Expected starting date of Action
Installation starts in 2013 and operation starts in
2015
Lifetime
20 years
Mitigation Potential
Implementing Entity and Contact Information
Type of GHGs reduced: CO2
Annual reduction: 611 tCO2e
Total reduction: 12,220 tCO2e (20 years)
Methodology applied for estimation:
General calculation method in IPCC Guidelines
Entity Name
Contact Person
Title
Phone
E-mail
Public Utility Company District Heating
Plants of Belgrade
Mr. Petar Vasiljevic
General Manager Assistant
+381-11-20-93-392
[email protected]
MRV
In accordance with international MRV system
Ministry of Energy, Development, and
Environmental Protection, Republic of Serbia
http://www.ekoplan.gov.rs/en/index.php
Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA)
http://www.jica.go.jp/english/index.html
9
NAMA Coordinating Entity
Ministry of Energy, Development, and Environmental Protection
Climate Change Division
State Secretary: Mr. Vladan Zdravkovic
Head of Climate Change Division: Ms. Danijela Bozanic
Tel:
+381-11-3131-355
Fax:
+381-11-3131-355
Email: [email protected]
NATIONALLY APPROPRIATE MITIGATION ACTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA
Using of Waste Heat from Thermal Power Plant for Heating the City
of Belgrade, Serbia
The NAMA involves construction of a pipeline from thermal power plant Nikola Tesla A (TENT A). The pipeline will
supply Heat Plant New Belgrade with hot water from the power plant. Waste heat from Nikola Tesla TENT A will cover
the basic load at the Heat Plant. The total heat capacity of heat source and pipeline will be 570 MW. With operating
time of 3500 hours/year, the pipeline will supply approximately 2,000 GWh of heat to district heating system in
Belgrade, thus achieving energy savings of 194 million Nm3 of natural gas and 34,000 tons of heavy oil consumption.
Type of Action
Project
Boundary and Location
Power plant is located on the right bank of river Sava,
30 km upstream Belgrade, near the city of Obrenovac
Heat Plant New Belgrade is located on the left bank
of river Sava in New Belgrade
BAU Scenario
District heating system in Belgrade will continue
using natural gas and heavy oil for heat production
instead of waste heat from thermal power plant
Mitigation Target
2,000 GWh of waste heat supply to Belgrade district
heating system yearly
Reduction of energy consumption in heat plant: 194
million Nm3 of natural gas and 34,000 tons of heavy
oil yearly
Mitigation Potential
Type of GHGs reduced: CO2
Annual reduction: 161,875 tCO2e
Total reduction: 6,475,012 tCO2e (40 years)
Methodology applied for estimation:
General calculation method used in Initial National
Communication of Serbia
MRV
In accordance with international MRV system
Contribution to Sustainable Development
Finance and Cost
Total Investment Cost: EUR 200 million for basic
investment for finishing construction work
Financial sources: N/A
Simple payback period: 2.1 years
Current Status and Schedule
Current Status
The Project has been continuously considered since
1981. The basic design was finished in 1980s and
construction of pipeline started in 1990s, but it has
not been completed.
Feasibility study ongoing
Expected starting date of Action
Construction planned for 2013 and commissioning of
the unit planned for 2016
Lifetime
40 years
Implementing Entity and Contact Information
Entity Name
Contact Person
Title
Phone
E-mail
Public Enterprise Electric Power
Industry of Serbia (EPS)
Public Utility Company District Heating
Plants of Belgrade (JKP BE)
City of Belgrade
Ministry of Energy, Development
and Environmental Protection (MEDEP)
Mr. Aleksandar Puljevic (MEDEP)
Advisor
+381-11-33-46-755
[email protected]
Efficient use of waste heat as energy source
Reduced negative impacts on natural environment
Reduction of financial expenses by local community
Ministry of Energy, Development, and
Environmental Protection, Republic of Serbia
http://www.ekoplan.gov.rs/en/index.php
Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA)
http://www.jica.go.jp/english/index.html
10
NAMA Coordinating Entity
Ministry of Energy, Development, and Environmental Protection
Climate Change Division
State Secretary: Mr. Vladan Zdravkovic
Head of Climate Change Division: Ms. Danijela Bozanic
Tel:
+381-11-3131-355
Fax:
+381-11-3131-355
Email: [email protected]
NATIONALLY APPROPRIATE MITIGATION ACTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA
Rehabilitation of Arterial Roads in Serbia
Although approximately 3,500 km of roads have been rehabilitated in the past 10 years, a significant part of Serbian arterial
roads has not been maintained sufficiently due to the lack of funds and are so deteriorated that caused congestion as well as
traffic accidents. The NAMA involves rehabilitation of 19 arterial road sections, whose total length is 297.5 km.
Climate change mitigation will be achieved by improving road surface that will prevent excessive slow mobility of vehicles
and accompanied fuel saving of gasoline and diesel.
Type of Action
Project
Boundary and Location
Project will take place on 19 different arterial road
sections throughout the country
BAU Scenario
Poor condition of pavement on proposed arterial road
sections remains the same and fossil fuel
consumption will remain large as the vehicles are
forced to move slowly
Mitigation Target
Improved fuel consumption level by all vehicles that
is achieved by running speed of 80 km/h, or the
International Roughness Index (IRI) of the proposed
roads are improved up to the value of 2.0 m/km
Contribution to Sustainable Development
Improvement of local environmental condition
Reduction of traffic congestion, and traffic accidents
Creation of local employment opportunities
Finance and Cost
Total Investment Cost: EUR 139.328 million
Financial sources: N/A
Program Analyses (PA) was done on the network
level, through which it is confirmed justification of
the investment in the nominated projects
Current Status and Schedule
Current Status
Road database prepared as a source of relevant data
(AADT, vehicle by type, IRI)
Expected starting date of Action
Design will be prepared from 2013 to 2015㻌 and
rehabilitation works will be completed by 2020
Mitigation Potential
Type of GHGs reduced: CO2
Annual reduction: 2,617 tCO2e
Total reduction: 52,340 tCO2e (20 years)
Methodology applied for estimation:
General calculation method based on IPCC Guidelines
MRV
In accordance with international MRV system
Lifetime
20 years
Implementing Entity and Contact Information
Entity
Name
Contact
Person
Title
Phone
E-mail
Ministry of Energy, Development, and
Environmental Protection, Republic of Serbia
http://www.ekoplan.gov.rs/en/index.php
Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA)
http://www.jica.go.jp/english/index.html
11
Ministry of Transport
Mr. Aleksandar Pavlovic
Advisor, Sector of Road
Transport, Department
of International Road
Transport
+381-64-289-1213
[email protected]
Public Enterprise
"Roads of Serbia"
Mr. Zoran Drobnjak
General Manager
+381-11-3040-701
[email protected]
NAMA Coordinating Entity
Ministry of Energy, Development, and Environmental Protection
Climate Change Division
State Secretary: Mr. Vladan Zdravkovic
Head of Climate Change Division: Ms. Danijela Bozanic
Tel:
+381-11-3131-355
Fax:
+381-11-3131-355
Email: [email protected]
NATIONALLY APPROPRIATE MITIGATION ACTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA
Rehabilitation of Regional Roads in Serbia
Although approximately 3,500 km of roads have been rehabilitated in the past 10 years, a significant part of Serbian regional
roads has not been maintained sufficiently due to the lack of funds and are so deteriorated that caused congestion as well as
traffic accidents. The NAMA involves rehabilitation of 129 regional road sections, whose total length is 2,768 km.
Climate change mitigation will be achieved by improving road surface that will prevent excessive slow mobility of vehicles
and accompanied fuel saving of gasoline and diesel.
Type of Action
Project
Boundary and Location
Project will take place on up to 129 different regional
road sections throughout the country
BAU Scenario
Poor condition of pavement on proposed regional
road sections remains the same and fossil fuel
consumption will remain large as the vehicles are
forced to move slowly
Mitigation Target
Improved fuel consumption level by all vehicles that
is achieved by running speed of 80 km/h, or the
International Roughness Index (IRI) of the proposed
roads are improved up to the value of 2.0 m/km
Contribution to Sustainable Development
Improvement of local environmental condition
Reduction of traffic congestion, and traffic accidents
Creation of local employment opportunities
Finance and Cost
Total Investment Cost: EUR 500 million
Financial sources: N/A
Program Analyses (PA) was done on the network
level, through which it is confirmed justification of
the investment in the nominated projects
Current Status and Schedule
Current Status
Road database prepared as a source of relevant data
(AADT, vehicle by type, IRI)
Expected starting date of Action
Design will be prepared until October 2013㻌 and
rehabilitation works will be completed by 2017
Mitigation Potential
Type of GHGs reduced: CO2
Annual reduction: 6,476 tCO2e
Total reduction: 129,520 tCO2e (20 years)
Methodology applied for estimation:
General calculation method based on IPCC Guidelines
MRV
In accordance with international MRV system
Lifetime
20 years
Implementing Entity and Contact Information
Entity
Name
Contact
Person
Title
Phone
E-mail
Ministry of Energy, Development, and
Environmental Protection, Republic of Serbia
http://www.ekoplan.gov.rs/en/index.php
Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA)
http://www.jica.go.jp/english/index.html
12
Ministry of Transport
Mr. Aleksandar Pavlovic
Advisor, Sector of Road
Transport, Department
of International Road
Transport
+381-64-289-1213
[email protected]
Public Enterprise
"Roads of Serbia"
Mr. Zoran Drobnjak
General Manager
+381-11-3040-701
[email protected]
NAMA Coordinating Entity
Ministry of Energy, Development, and Environmental Protection
Climate Change Division
State Secretary: Mr. Vladan Zdravkovic
Head of Climate Change Division: Ms. Danijela Bozanic
Tel:
+381-11-3131-355
Fax:
+381-11-3131-355
Email: [email protected]
NATIONALLY APPROPRIATE MITIGATION ACTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA
Expansion of Existing District Heating Network in Valjevo
The NAMA is the expansion of the existing district heating network to the city areas of Valjevo with the aim of energy
efficiency improvement and air pollution reduction. Total heat capacity to be connected to the district heating system under
the project will be 47.6 MW. The mitigation action involves installation of a hot water network in the length of 17.7 km
(䃥125 mm)㻌 and closure of 49 existing inefficient heating stations (boiler rooms) and a large number of individual furnaces.
147 new heating substations will also be constructed in order to supply heat to the total surface area of 356,742 m2. NAMA
will lead to climate change mitigation through reducing fuel consumption at outdated inefficient boilers for heating.
Type of Action
Contribution to Sustainable Development
Project
Reduction of local air pollution
Efficient use of energy sources
Creation of local employment opportunities
Boundary and Location
City of Valjevo, 75 km southwest from Belgrade
BAU Scenario
Existing inefficient boiler and furnaces will
continuously be used to supply heat to users
Finance and Cost
Total Investment Cost: EUR 9.1 million
(hot water network EUR 6.4 million and substations
EUR 2.7 million)
Financial sources: N/A
Simple pay back period: 18 years
Mitigation Target
Current Status and Schedule
Closure of 49 existing heating stations and furnaces
in 98 residential buildings
Mitigation Potential
Type of GHGs reduced: CO2
Annual reduction: 12,141 tCO2e
Total reduction: 364,230 tCO2e (30 years)
Methodology applied for estimation:
General calculation method based on IPCC Guidelines
Current Status
Technical documentation prepared for new heating
substations and network
Expected starting date of Action
Design and construction will start in 2013 and
completed by 2016
Lifetime
30 years
MRV
Implementing Entity and Contact Information
In accordance with international MRV system
Entity Name
City of Valjevo
Contact Person
Mr. Radivoje
Milutinovic
Assistant Mayor
+381 14 294 702
rmilutinovic@
valjevo.org.rs
Title
Phone
E-mail
Ministry of Energy, Development, and
Environmental Protection, Republic of Serbia
http://www.ekoplan.gov.rs/en/index.php
Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA)
http://www.jica.go.jp/english/index.html
13
District Heating
Company Valjevo
Mr. Dragan
Despotovic
General manager
+381 14 3511 916
[email protected]
NAMA Coordinating Entity
Ministry of Energy, Development, and Environmental Protection
Climate Change Division
State Secretary: Mr. Vladan Zdravkovic
Head of Climate Change Division: Ms. Danijela Bozanic
Tel:
+381-11-3131-355
Fax:
+381-11-3131-355
Email: [email protected]
NATIONALLY APPROPRIATE MITIGATION ACTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA
Improvement of Old Residential Buildings Envelope (Exterior Doors,
Windows and Thermal Insulation) in Serbia
Residential buildings in Serbia that were built between 1950’s and 1980’s do not have effective thermal insulation, and
thus consume tremendous amount of energy for space heating. Objective of the NAMA is the rehabilitation of about
10% of the existing residential buildings throughout Serbia that were built in the said period. Detailed measures to be
applied to the buildings include rehabilitation of buildings’ envelope (thermal insulation of non-transparent elements:
external walls, partitions to unheated spaces, roofs, ceilings, etc.), and replacement of windows with new
five-chamber PVC frames, double glazing, low-emissivity glass, filled with argon gas.
With the application of all above measures, specific annual energy consumption for heating will decrease from 160
kWh/m2y to around 70 kWh/m2y and GHGs emission reduction will be achieved.
Type of Action
Contribution to Sustainable Development
Program
Efficient use of energy sources
Increase the level of indoor comfort
Creation of local employment opportunities
Boundary and Location
Targeted residential buildings are located throughout
Serbia
BAU Scenario
Old existing buildings will not be applied with any
rehabilitation measures, and energy efficiency of the
buildings remains the current level
Mitigation Target
About 10,000 buildings with total surface area of
about 10 million square meters to be retrofitted
Mitigation Potential
Type of GHGs reduced: CO2
Annual reduction: 503,929 tCO2e
Total reduction: 15,117,870 tCO2e (30 years)
Methodology applied for estimation:
General calculation method based on IPCC Guidelines
Finance and Cost
Total Investment Cost: EUR 723.48 million
Financial sources: A part of financial sources could
be provided by building owners. Other parts will
include the state and some sort of non-commercial
loans.
Simple payback period: 16 years
Current Status and Schedule
Current Status
Pilot projects ongoing
Expected starting date of Action
Rehabilitation of buildings will start in 2013 and will
be completed in 2020
Lifetime
30 years
Implementing Entity and Contact Information
MRV
In accordance with international MRV system
Entity Name
Contact Person
Title
Phone
E-mail
Ministry of Energy, Development, and
Environmental Protection, Republic of Serbia
http://www.ekoplan.gov.rs/en/index.php
Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA)
http://www.jica.go.jp/english/index.html
14
Ministry of Construction and Urbanism
Ms. Jasminka Pavlovic
Sector for Construction and Land, Head
of Department for Energy Efficiency
and Construction Products
+381-11-3616-420
[email protected]
NAMA Coordinating Entity
Ministry of Energy, Development, and Environmental Protection
Climate Change Division
State Secretary: Mr. Vladan Zdravkovic
Head of Climate Change Division: Ms. Danijela Bozanic
Tel:
+381-11-3131-355
Fax:
+381-11-3131-355
Email: [email protected]
NATIONALLY APPROPRIATE MITIGATION ACTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA
Construction of New Energy Efficient Buildings
Based on Energy Efficiency Regulation in Serbia
Although Serbia has introduced a regulation in the 1970’s that requires minimum energy efficiency for new residential and
non-residential buildings, and has continuously improved the regulation, the country is taking one further step to make the
regulation even much stricter than the previous standard. Under the new regulation, “Regulations on Energy Efficiency in
Buildings”, all new buildings will be installed with better thermal insulation of non-transparent elements, including external
walls, partitions to unheated space, roofs, ceilings, etc., and with better windows quality, such as five-chamber PVC frames,
etc. This allows specific annual heat energy consumption for new residential buildings will decrease from 100 to 60 kWh/m2y,
and that for new non-residential buildings from 110 to 70 kWh/m2y and GHGs emission reduction will be achieved.
Type of Action
Program/ Regulation
Boundary and Location
Targeted buildings located throughout the country
BAU Scenario
All new buildings are installed with thermal insulation
technologies that meet the minimum required energy
efficiency standard, and technologies more efficient
than that standard will not be introduced but it will be
possible
Mitigation Target
About 39% of energy for heating will be saved at
target new buildings
In the period from 2013 to 2020, approximately 9.2
million m2 of residential area and 4.5 million m2 of
non-residential area will be built under new
regulation
Mitigation Potential
Type of GHGs reduced: CO2
Annual reduction: 275,282 tCO2e
Total reduction: 8,258,460 tCO2e (30 years)
Methodology applied for estimation:
General calculation method based on IPCC Guidelines
Contribution to Sustainable Development
Reduction of fossil fuel import
Creation of employment opportunities
Awareness raising among general public regarding
energy saving
Finance and Cost
Total Investment Cost: EUR 285.5 million
Current Status and Schedule
Current Status
The new Regulation on Energy Efficiency in Buildings
was adopted in August 2011 and came into force in
September 2012
Expected starting date of Action
Construction will start in 2013 and operation will
start continuously.
Lifetime
Approximately 30 years
Implementing Entity and Contact Information
Entity Name
Contact Person
Title
MRV
In accordance with domestic MRV system
In accordance with international MRV system where
technologies that achieve energy efficiency level
higher than minimum standard required by the
regulation
Ministry of Energy, Development, and
Environmental Protection, Republic of Serbia
http://www.ekoplan.gov.rs/en/index.php
Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA)
http://www.jica.go.jp/english/index.html
15
Phone
E-mail
Ministry of Construction and Urbanism
Ms. Jasminka Pavlovic
Sector for Construction and Land, Head
of Department for Energy Efficiency
and Construction Products
+381-11-3616-420
[email protected]
NAMA Coordinating Entity
Ministry of Energy, Development, and Environmental Protection
Climate Change Division
State Secretary: Mr. Vladan Zdravkovic
Head of Climate Change Division: Ms. Danijela Bozanic
Tel:
+381-11-3131-355
Fax:
+381-11-3131-355
Email: [email protected]
NATIONALLY APPROPRIATE MITIGATION ACTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA
Energy Efficiency Improvements in Public Buildings: 23 Schools and
26 Hospitals - Serbian Energy Efficiency Project (SEEP)
Most of the old public buildings in Serbia do not have any energy saving measures applied and they are consuming
significant amount of energy, which is contributing to GHG emissions in Serbia.
The NAMA involves application of energy efficiency measures to public buildings such as schools and hospitals.
Detailed site portfolio and locations will be identified by line ministries. Tentative number of potential sites for NAMA
project is 49 public buildings (23 schools and 26 hospitals). Potential energy efficiency measures include façade
insulation, roof, ceiling, wall insulation, window replacement, HVAC system reconstruction, etc.
Type of Action
Program
Boundary and Location
Target public buildings throughout the country
Finance and Cost
Total Investment Cost: EUR 12.5 million
Financial sources:
Average of Simple Payback Period for 23 schools:
10.2 years (varied from 3.4 to 20.2)
Average of Simple Payback Period for 26 hospitals:
6.7 years (varied from 3.0 to 17.3)
BAU Scenario
Energy efficiency level of schools and hospitals
remains same (not improved)
Mitigation Target
Energy efficiency improvement at 49 public buildings
Approximately 40% savings in energy consumption
Mitigation Potential
Type of GHGs reduced: CO2
Annual reduction: 8,326 tCO2e
Total reduction: 208,150 tCO2e (25 years)
Methodology applied for estimation:
original calculation methods based on IPCC
Guidelines
MRV
In accordance with international MRV system
Contribution to Sustainable Development
Reduction of fuel consumption
Energy efficiency improvement experience and
awareness raising among the municipal and local
government officials
Ministry of Energy, Development, and
Environmental Protection, Republic of Serbia
http://www.ekoplan.gov.rs/en/index.php
Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA)
http://www.jica.go.jp/english/index.html
16
Current Status and Schedule
Current Status
SEEP 1 completed (2005-2010; 28 buildings)
SEEP 2 ongoing (to be completed in April 2013; 64
buildings)
Target buildings are tentatively selected. Preliminary
energy audit will be conducted for target buildings.
Technical discussion ongoing
Expected starting date of Action
Construction starts in 2013 or when the financial
sources are identified.
Lifetime
25 years
Implementing Entity and Contact Information
Entity Name
Ministry of Energy, Development and
Environmental Protection
Contact Person Dimitrije Lilic
Title
Senior Advisor
Phone
+381 11 3131 955
E-mail
[email protected]
NAMA Coordinating Entity
Ministry of Energy, Development, and Environmental Protection
Climate Change Division
State Secretary: Mr. Vladan Zdravkovic
Head of Climate Change Division: Ms. Danijela Bozanic
Tel:
+381-11-3131-355
Fax:
+381-11-3131-355
Email: [email protected]
ῧ௜㈨ᩱ㸶 NAMA ࢩ࣮ࣙࢺࢹ࢕ࢫࢡࣜࣉࢩࣙࣥ
NATIONALLY APPROPRIATE MITIGATION ACTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA
NAMA SHORT DESCRIPTION
GENERAL INFORMATION
Title of NAMA
Construction of a 790MW Ultra Supercritical Lignite Power Plant TPP Nikola Tesla – Unit B3
Description
Description of the Mitigation Action
The NAMA represents construction of the new 790 MW unit on TPP Nikola Tesla B location.
It is foreseen as condensing type, ultra supercritical steam parameters, with a river water once-through
cooling system, mainly designed to operate in the electric power system of Serbia and at the base load level
of the load diagram.
The NAMA will contribute to climate change mitigation as the highly efficient plant emits less GHG than
existing TPPs. By its operation, it reduces GHGs that would be otherwise emitted by less efficient
grid-connected TPPs in the absence of the mitigation action. The plant is expected to become the first ultra
supercritical power plant in Serbia and will result in technology transfer of state-of-the-art clean coal
technology.
Technologies/measures
The design must incorporate a high efficiency (coal usage) unit of modern construction with ultra
supercritical steam parameters and cycle. Total power of the unit should be approximately 730 MW at the
net connection. The unit will use lignite from the Open Pit Mine Kolubara as primary fuel. The lignite will be
delivered to the plant location as homogenized coal of stated mean calorific value of 6,900 kJ/kg.
The unit will be connected to the electric power system at the 400 kV voltage level via transmission lines
and the switchgear Mladost located 9 km from the TPP Nikola Tesla B.
Minimum expected annual operating time is 7,600 h/year.
TPP Nikola Tesla B3 technical data
Data in this table are of indicative nature. Preliminary technical analysis currently ongoing and the
detailed technical data will be available by March 2013.
Parameter
Value
Unit
Boiler type
Once-though, Benson type, with superheated steam parameters
Turbine type
Condensing, with steam extractions
Unit power, total
ߊ 790
MW
Unit power, net
ߊ 730
MW
Rotor speed
3,000
r/min
Generator Voltage
24
kV
Number of reheating
1
Number of turbine extractions
8
Ministry of Energy, Development and Environmental Protection, Republic of Serbia
Japan International Cooperation Agency
1
NATIONALLY APPROPRIATE MITIGATION ACTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA
NAMA SHORT DESCRIPTION
Parameter
Value
Unit
§ 43
%
> 9,000
kJ/kWh
ߊ 88
%
> 2,000
t/h
ߊ 6,900
kJ/kg
Condensing pressure at nominal
operating conditions
ߊ 0.043
Bar
Cooling water temperature tin/tout
14 / 23
o
Net Unit efficiency
Net specific heat consumption of
the Unit
Boiler efficiency
Live steam flow rate
Basic fuel – Coal
Lignite, Low heating value
Cooling system
C
Boiler Load
Minimal boiler load with coal firing
only
40
%
Minimal boiler load with liquid fuel
firing only
35
%
Operating range at once-through
operating conditions
40 – 100
%
Operating range at sliding operating
conditions
40 – 100
%
in 40-80 % range and variation
>25 %
6
%/min
in 80 - 100 % range and variation
20 %
4
%/min
in 90 -100 % range and variation
>5 %
2
%/min
NOx (at 6% O2)
200
mg/Nm3
SO2 (at 6% O2)
200
mg/Nm3
CO2
262
g/Nm3
Particles
30
mg/Nm3
Load change gradient
Emissions of harmful combustion products
Location
TPP Nikola Tesla B is located on the right hand bank of the Sava River, 59 km upstream of Belgrade. The
new power plant is located near the village Vorbis, between the villages of Skela and Usce, 12 km upstream
of TPP Nikola Tesla A. Geographical location is given at the picture below.
Ministry of Energy, Development and Environmental Protection, Republic of Serbia
Japan International Cooperation Agency
2
NATIONALLY APPROPRIATE MITIGATION ACTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA
NAMA SHORT DESCRIPTION
Project site
NAMA Implementing Entity
Public Enterprise Electric Power Industry of Serbia (EPS)
EPS is a 100% state-owned company whose main business include electric power generation, electric
power distribution and distribution system management, electric power trade, coal production, processing
and transport, steam and hot water production in combined heating processes, water power utilization and
services in river and lake traffic, wholesale trade in fuel and similar products. EPS operations also include
research and development, design, construction and maintenance of energy and mining plants, design,
construction and operation of telecommunication facilities and engineering.
www.eps.rs
Implementing Schedule
Time span
2013 – 2016
Preparatory period
2017 – 2020
Implementation
Activity
Feasibility Study with Preliminary Design of TENT B3 – including Revision
by the State Revision Committee, securing project funding, Main Designs
for TENT B3 construction – including Technical Review, obtaining the
necessary approvals from the relevant institutions, preparation of tender
documents, bidding and contracting procedures and other necessary
activities
Construction, commissioning, trial operation and guarantee tests.
Ministry of Energy, Development and Environmental Protection, Republic of Serbia
Japan International Cooperation Agency
3
NATIONALLY APPROPRIATE MITIGATION ACTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA
NAMA SHORT DESCRIPTION
Expected starting date of Action
Construction starts in 2017 and operation starts in 2020
Lifetime
30 years
Current Status
Operations stability study and selection of the most favorable parameter values and TPP Kolubara B and
TENT B3 turbo aggregates and block-transformer characteristics
Study on Environmental Impact Assessment of TENT B3
Preliminary technical and financial analysis of application of ultra supercritical technology in 2012 – 2013.
Coverage
Sector: Energy – Fuel combustion – Energy industries - Energy efficiency improvement
GHG Gases: CO2
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Finance and Cost
Expected cost of preparation:
EUR 40 million for investment and technical documentation
(more accurate expected cost will be available by March 2013)
Expected cost of implementation:
EUR1,200 million
(more accurate expected cost will be available by March 2013)
Expected incremental cost of implementation:
(more accurate expected cost will be available by March 2013)
Financial sources identified:
EPS would provide up to 30% of the investment.
Financial analysis:
Preliminary financial analysis is currently under development. Result of the analysis will be available by
March 2013 upon request.
Ministry of Energy, Development and Environmental Protection, Republic of Serbia
Japan International Cooperation Agency
4
NATIONALLY APPROPRIATE MITIGATION ACTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA
NAMA SHORT DESCRIPTION
INFORMATION ON SUPPORT REQUIRED
Description of Support Required
Type of Support
Financial
Support required for
preparation
30 million EUR for technical design
Technical
x
Capacity Building
x
Support required for
implementation
Approximately 850 million EUR as a
share of the Strategic Partner in the
project
Technology transfer of USC technology
for electricity generation
O&M of the new TPP
(more accurate information will be available by March 2013)
EXPECTED GHG EMISSION REDUCTIONS AND MRV
Expected Mitigation Potential
Annual reduction: 1,337,728 tCO2e
Total reduction: 40,131,830 tCO2e (30 years)
Methodologies and Assumptions
Methodologies: Ex-ante and ex-post calculation of GHG emission reduction is conducted based on the
approved CDM methodology, ACM0013 – “Consolidated baseline and monitoring methodology for new grid
connected fossil fuel fired power plants using a less GHG intensive technology.” A deviation from the said
methodology was applied in the calculation since several information was not available in order to
determine the baseline power plants as specified in the CDM methodology, i.e. similar power plants that
meet specified conditions in the geographical area in all neighboring non-Annex I countries or all non-Annex
I countries in the continent.
Instead of considering those power plants in other countries, the NAMA takes into consideration the current
condition and reasonable future projections of the power generation and electricity market in Serbia.
BAU scenario: Continued operation of the existing sub-critical lignite-fired power plants is the most likely
baseline scenario, as it has the lowest levelized costs of electricity generation.
Calculation of emission reduction
Baseline emissions
Baseline emissions are calculated by multiplying the electricity generated in the project plant using lignite
fossil fuel (EGPJ,y) with a baseline CO2 emission factor (EFBL,CO2), as follows:
Ministry of Energy, Development and Environmental Protection, Republic of Serbia
Japan International Cooperation Agency
5
NATIONALLY APPROPRIATE MITIGATION ACTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA
NAMA SHORT DESCRIPTION
BE y = EG PJ,y * EFBL,CO2
and
EFBL,CO2 = 3.6 * EFFF,co2 /ǆBL
Where:
EG PJ,y
=
Total net quantity of electricity generated in the project plant in year y
(MWh/yr)
EFBL,CO2
=
Baseline emission factor (t CO2/MWh)
EFFF,co2
=
CO2 emission factor of the fossil fuel type (lignite) used in the project and
the baseline (t CO2/GJ)
ǆBL
=
Energy efficiency of the power generation technology that has been
identified as the most likely baseline scenario
3.6
=
Unit conversion factor from GJ to MWh
Data / Parameter
Unit
EGPJ,y
Description
Source of data
Net electricity generated by the project power plant in year y
Calculated based on installed capacity of the plant (790 MW) and
anticipated working hours of the plant (7,600 h)
Expected amount of electricity consumed for power plant
operation is not included.
6,004,000 MWh
Value applied
MWh
Data / Parameter
Unit
Description
EFFF,CO2,y
Source of data
Value applied
Initial National Communication of the Republic of Serbia, Annex 1
“Net calorific value and emission factor of the raw lignite from
pit-mine exploitation in the republic of Serbia”
0.10962 tCO2/GJ
Data / Parameter
Unit
%
Description
Source of data
tCO2/GJ
CO2 emission factor of the fossil fuel type used in the project plant
in year y – lignite from Kolubara pit mine
ǆBL
Energy efficiency value of the power generation technology that
can be considered as the most likely baseline scenario
Efficiency is calculated based on the following reasonable
projections and assumptions:
1. Four units of the existing power plant (Kolubara TPP, units A1
to A4), which are connected to the Serbian national grid, will
be closed once the proposed ultra supercritical power plant is
constructed, whose total installed capacity is 160MW.
Ministry of Energy, Development and Environmental Protection, Republic of Serbia
Japan International Cooperation Agency
6
NATIONALLY APPROPRIATE MITIGATION ACTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA
NAMA SHORT DESCRIPTION
2.
A new thermal power plant that uses conventional sub-critical
technology will be installed and connected to the grid, which
should be same or larger than 630 MW, a difference between
the proposed power plant size (790MW) and the four units
that will be closed (160MW).
Efficiency of the above item 1. is 25%, based on the calculation by
EPS. Efficiency of the above item 2. is 37%, based on the average
efficiency of the conventional sub-critical technology available in
the market today.
ˤBL is calculated as:
(160*0.25 + 630*0.37) / 790 = 0.3457
Value applied
34.6%
Baseline emissions are calculated as:
BEy = 3.6 * 0.10962 / 34.6 * 6,004,000
= 6,847,892 (t-CO2)
Project emissions
Project emissions are the CO2 emission from combustion of lignite at the new power plant. The CO2
emissions from electricity generation in the project plant (PEy) can be calculated as follows:
PE y = EG PJ,y * EFPJ,CO2
and
EFPJ,CO2 = 3.6 * EFFF,co2 /ǆPJ
Where:
EFPJ,CO2
=
Project emission factor (t CO2/MWh)
ǆPJ
=
Energy efficiency of the project power plant
Data / Parameter
Unit
Description
Source of data
Value applied
ǆPJ
%
Project power plant energy efficiency value
Manufacturer’s catalogue
43.0%
Project emissions are calculated as:
PEy = 3.6 * 0.10962 / 43.0 * 6,004,000
= 5,510,164 (t-CO2)
Ministry of Energy, Development and Environmental Protection, Republic of Serbia
Japan International Cooperation Agency
7
NATIONALLY APPROPRIATE MITIGATION ACTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA
NAMA SHORT DESCRIPTION
Emissions reductions
Emission reductions are a difference between baseline emissions and project emissions.
ERy = BEy - PEy
= 6,847,892 tCO2 - 5,510,164 tCO2
= 1,337,728 tCO2
Measurement, Reporting, and Verification (MRV)
Monitoring plan
Data and parameters to be monitored:
Data / Parameter
Unit
Description
Source of data
EG y
MWh
Electricity generated by the project power plant in year y
Operation centre at generation system
Measurement
procedures
Measured continuously by electricity meter equipped at the
power plant and recorded daily.
Monthly compiled and aggregated data is recorded on
computer.
The electricity meters will be periodically calibrated according
to the relevant national industrial standards and regulations.
Meter readings will be compared to electricity sales receipts.
Monitoring
frequency
QA/QC procedures
Data / Parameter
Unit
Description
FClignite,y
Ton/ year
Annual lignite fuel consumption at the project power plant in year
y
Source of data
Measurement
procedures
Monitoring
frequency
QA/QC procedures
Data / Parameter
Unit
Description
Source of data
Operation centre at generation system
Measured continuously by weighing bridge at the power plant
and recorded daily.
Monthly compiled and aggregated data is recorded on
computer.
The weighing bridge and its meters will be periodically
calibrated according to the relevant national industrial
standards and regulations.
The consistency of metered fuel consumption quantities will be
cross-checked by an annual energy balance that is based on
purchased quantities and stock changes.
NCVlignite,y
GJ/ton
Weighted average net calorific value of lignite fuel in year y
Values provided by the fuel supplier in invoices/ monitored at
the laboratory located in the project power plant
Ministry of Energy, Development and Environmental Protection, Republic of Serbia
Japan International Cooperation Agency
8
NATIONALLY APPROPRIATE MITIGATION ACTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA
NAMA SHORT DESCRIPTION
Measurement
procedures
Laboratories in the power plant will measure the value for each
fuel delivery.
Monitoring
frequency
NCV value will be obtained for each fuel delivery, from which
QA/QC procedures
Laboratories will have ISO accreditation and data will be
checked according to international standard.
weighted average annual values will be calculated.
Monitoring plan and structure:
Monitoring of the data and parameters above will be conducted based on the EPS monitoring structure
shown below.
Monitoring activities will be conducted by EPS, the NAMA implementing entity, based on its ISO 9001:2008
certified quality management system.
Ministry of Energy, Development and Environmental Protection, Republic of Serbia
Japan International Cooperation Agency
9
NATIONALLY APPROPRIATE MITIGATION ACTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA
NAMA SHORT DESCRIPTION
NAMA Monitoring Structure
Calibration * - Verification and benchmarking meters are calibrated by accredited Metrology laboratories,
which are accredited by the Accreditation Body of Serbia (ATS).
The Distribution System Operator must take care that all meters in his ownership be verified and calibrated
Ministry of Energy, Development and Environmental Protection, Republic of Serbia
Japan International Cooperation Agency
10
NATIONALLY APPROPRIATE MITIGATION ACTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA
NAMA SHORT DESCRIPTION
in time and in the manner prescribed by the Law on Metrology, according to meters class.
All the meters for the calculation of generation/ consumed electricity are ownership of Distribution system
operators, including meters in the Nikola Tesla TPP. Monthly reading generation/ consumption of electricity is
done by Distribution system operator on a monthly basis.
Reporting course:
x
x
x
x
After metering readings of electricity generation in TPP, all Distribution system operators - Distribution
Subsidiariess submit monthly reports to EPS Electricity Trade Department for the calculation and
payment of electricity delivered.
EPS Electricity Trade Department, based on monthly reports at the request of the common functions of
EPS Environmental Protection section submit the data for delivered and calculated electricity production
on a annually base from TPP.
Common functions of EPS Environmental Protection section include CO2 emissions reduction calculation
based on data obtained from Electricity Trade Department on an annual basis and deliver to General
Manager of EPS and Board of Directors.
EPS submits CO2 Emission Reduction Monitoring Report to Verification authorities.
Accuracy control:
x
x
Verification and calibration standards of meters shall be subject to such terms and in the manner
specified by regulatory law, by an accredited laboratory, on which a Distribution system operator shall
maintain proper records.
In case of conflict or doubt that there is a conflict in the read values assumed for calculation of delivered
electric energy, all participants in the generation, reading and calculation of electric energy the TPP may
request that the Commission establish the accuracy of the readings or calculated data, in accordance
with long-term contracts.
Domestic MRV arrangements
Domestic MRV arrangement of Serbia is currently under development.
It is expected that under the Serbian domestic MRV system, a NAMA implementing entity is responsible
for the Measurement (M) and Reporting (R) activities, which will go trough Verification (V) from third
party.
It is expected that the MRV of the proposed NAMA will be conducted in the following manner:
1. EPS will conduct the Measurement activity based on the above-mentioned monitoring plan in order
to calculate the emission reductions achieved by the NAMA.
2. EPS will prepare a Report that contains information on 1) the detailed result of the monitoring
activities conducted based on the monitoring plan, 2) the result of emission reduction calculation
based on the above mentioned methodology, and 3) any support received under NAMA scheme
from Annex-I countries or international organization regarding financial support, technical support,
or support on capacity building.
Ministry of Energy, Development and Environmental Protection, Republic of Serbia
Japan International Cooperation Agency
11
NATIONALLY APPROPRIATE MITIGATION ACTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA
NAMA SHORT DESCRIPTION
OTHER INFORMATION
Contribution to Sustainable Development
Implementation of the NAMA is meeting majority of the Sustainable Development Indicators in accordance with
three criterion indicated in appendix of the Serbian DNA Rules of procedure.
According to the economic criterion, it satisfies following fields:
1. Investing conditions - Construction of the new TPP will be carried out through strategic partnership of
EPS and power utility that will be selected on the international tender. EPS would participate with up to 30%
of the capital, while the strategic partner would provide the rest of investments amounting 900 millions EUR.
2. Sustainable technology transfer - Final technological solution is not been defined yet, but it is
anticipated that TPP Nikola Tesla B3 will be unit of the modern construction with supercritical steam
parameters, which represent the best available technology at this point.
3. Economic development of the region - Construction of the TPP Nikola Tesla B3 will bring construction of
new infrastructure; it also contributes to the power system stability and supply security, which consequently
have effect on the stability of the prices for electric energy.
4. Employment - Construction of the TPP Nikola Tesla will provide work for many domestic companies.
After commissioning and connection to the network, new work places will be available at the power plant
and following facilities, as well as the chance for engagement of the companies from the sector of services
and maintenance on long-term basis.
5. Priorities of the sector - Power generation at the TPP Nikola Tesla B3 will contribute to the power
system stability and supply security, which represent one of the priorities in the energy sector.
6. Consumption and generation - Power generation at the new power plant will reduce need for electricity
import, and its modern concept will reduce waste production per unit of generated energy as well as waste
management in ecology acceptable manner.
According to the social criterion, it satisfies following fields:
1. Participation of the interested parties - Project TPP Nikola Tesla B3 will be implemented with strategic
partner on mutual benefit. Strategic partner will provide technology and financing, while EPS will provide
fuel supply, existing infrastructure, and part of the funds. Implementation of this project includes
participation of every governmental structure from the state to the local level, which supporting project due
to its many advantages.
2. Life conditions improvement - Project implementation of such scope, lead up to the employment
increase, as well as income increase, on the local and regional level.
3. Capacity increase - According to the work needs and modern equipment maintenance, strategic
partner will provide training for the employees, as well as expertise and tools for local companies engaged
on this implementation of the project during its operational life.
According to the environment and natural resources criterions, it satisfies following fields:
1. Energy resources – Generation of TPP Nikola Tesla B3 will, due to the higher energy efficiency of the
plant, reduce coal consumption for power generation, and significantly reduce need for electricity import.
2. Air - Due to the application of the modern technology and higher energy efficiency of the plant, project
will result in reduced emission levels of CO2, SOx and NOx, comparing to the existing thermo power plants in
Serbia.
3. Water - Contribution to the sustainable water use would be the application of measures for water
treatment of all water quantities used in the technological process of electricity generation.
4. Soil - New thermo power plant will be constructed on the location of TPP Nikola Tesla B, where already
exist land for this purpose, as well as joint systems, so it would not be necessary to change the purpose of
the land. In addition, ash disposal will be at the area anticipated for this purpose with application of the
reclamation measures.
Ministry of Energy, Development and Environmental Protection, Republic of Serbia
Japan International Cooperation Agency
12
NATIONALLY APPROPRIATE MITIGATION ACTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA
NAMA SHORT DESCRIPTION
5. Biodiversity – Whether the ash disposal will be at the area reserved for that purpose or at the area of
the open pit mines of EPS - biological reclamation measures will contribute to the preservation of plants and
increase of wooded areas.
6. Natural recourses - Modern concept of the unit TPP Nikola Tesla B3 will significantly contribute to the
sustainable use of mineral recourses, because energy efficiency of primary energy transformation (§ 43%)
will be significantly higher than at existing thermal power plants in Serbia. Exploitation life of domestic lignite
deposits is extended that way.
Stakeholder consultation
EPS will conduct a public stakeholder consultation regarding the NAMA. At the consultation, objective and
outcome, expected impacts on local environment, employment opportunities, etc. will be presented to
stakeholders, and their comments will be collected and compiled.
EPS will take necessary due actions to the comments received during the public consultation and report the
results.
Public consultation will be held either through website or through meetings near the project site.
CONTACT INFORMATION
Implementing Entity
Entity Name
Contact Person
Title
Phone
E-mail
Public Enterprise Electric Power Industry of Serbia
Mihajlo Gavric
Environment Protection Manager of EPS
+381-11-3952-316
[email protected]
NAMA Coordinating Entity
Entity Name
Contact Person
Phone
E-mail
Ministry of Energy, Development, and Environmental
Protection
Climate Change Division
State Secretary: Mr. Vladan Zdravkovic
Head of Climate Change Division: Ms. Danijela Bozanic
+381-11-3131-355
[email protected]
Ministry of Energy, Development and Environmental Protection, Republic of Serbia
Japan International Cooperation Agency
13
NATIONALLY APPROPRIATE MITIGATION ACTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA
NAMA SHORT DESCRIPTION
GENERAL INFORMATION
Title of NAMA
Construction of 9 new small hydropower plants (HPPs) in Serbia
Description
Description of Mitigation Action
The NAMA involves construction of 9 new small hydropower plants (HPP) throughout Serbia. The total
capacity of 9HPP is 30.40 MW with possible electricity production of 108.3 GWh/year. All of the electricity
generated will be supplied to the Serbian electricity grid, which is currently composed mostly of carbonintensive lignite-fired thermal power plants.
The NAMA will contribute to climate change mitigation as the hydro power as renewable energy source
does not emit any greenhouse gases (GHGs) during operation, and reduces GHGs that would otherwise
be emitted from grid-connected power plants in the absence of the mitigation action.
Detailed list of HPPs is as below. Size of HPP varies from 0.5 MW to 11 MW.
Table 1㻌 List of HPPs
Watercourse
Capacity
(MW)
Jablanica
1.25
Expected
Generation
(GWh/y)
5.2
Veliki Rzav
7.65
22
9.28
Surdulica
Bozicki tunnel
1
4.85
2.98
Mala Vrla 1
Surdulica
Vrla, Gradska reka
0.47
1.83
0.8
5
Zavoj
Pirot
Visocica
0.58
2.94
1.112
6
W. s. Nis
Nis
Water supply Nis
4.9
4.88
1.0
7
Banjica
Sicevo
Nisava
2.3
12
5.9
8
Stalac
Stalac
Juzna Morava
11
48
29.0
9
Sokolja
Kraljevo
Sokolja, Gvozdacka reka
1.25
6.6
3.0
30.40
108.3
54.684
No
HPP name
1
Rovni
Valjevo
2
Svrackovo
Arilje
3
Jezero
4
Total
Location
Ministry of Energy, Development and Environmental Protection, Republic of Serbia
Japan International Cooperation Agency
Investment
(Million €)
1.612
1
NATIONALLY APPROPRIATE MITIGATION ACTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA
NAMA SHORT DESCRIPTION
Technology/ measure
Technical specification varies among 9 HPPs as shown in the tables below.
Construction activities differ from plant to plant. The main difference is whether a dam has to be built or
it already exists and can be used for the new HPP. Generally, civil structure and equipment for specified
HPPs usually consist of: water pipeline (different length, diameter and installed discharge), turbine
(Francis, Kaplan, Pelton type), generator set (one to four units), auxiliary equipment and control system.
9 HPPs can be categorized into three groups as follows:
x HPPs constructed on existing management facilities
2 HPPs of this type will be built. Total construction investments cover only the HPPs construction.
x HPPs constructed using the water discharged from the existing HPPs
The current plan is to build 2 HPPs of this type.
x HPPs constructed on new sites
This group of HPPs has still not been analyzed in details, and that other possible sites may be
included if, based on preliminary analyses, they are suitable for further consideration.
Table 2 Technical specifications of 9HPPs
HPP Name
Rovni
Svrackovo
Jezero
Nominal capacity
1.25 MW
7.65 MW
1.0 MW
Annual generation
5.2 GWh/year
22.0 GWh/year
4.85 GWh/year
Nominal head (m)
67 m
Installed 2.1 m3/s,
mean annual 1.341 m3/s
53.5 m
Installed 15.86 m3/s ,
mean annual 6.21 m3/s
12 m
Installed 8.0 m3/s ,
mean annual 3.9 m3/s
Number of turbines
3
3
2
Hydraulic turbines
Francis type
Francis type
Kaplan type
Rock-fill dam with clay core,
under reconstruction
Rock-fill dam with clay core
N/A
N/A
21 million m3
N/A
3
N/A
Discharge
Dam type
Available storage vol.
Total storage volume
3
49.5 million m
27 million m
Ministry of Energy, Development and Environmental Protection, Republic of Serbia
Japan International Cooperation Agency
2
NATIONALLY APPROPRIATE MITIGATION ACTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA
NAMA SHORT DESCRIPTION
HPP Name
Mala Vrla 1
Zavoj
Water supply Nis
Nominal capacity
0.47 MW
0.58 MW
4.9 MW
Annual generation
1.83 GWh/year
2.94 GWh/year
4.88 GWh/year
Nominal head (m)
42 m
Installed 1.4 m3/s ,
mean annual 0.8 m3/s
80 m
Installed 0.9 m3/s,
47 - 133 m
Installed 0.65 m3/s ,
mean annual 0.65 m3/s
Number of turbines
2
1
4
Hydraulic turbines
Banky type
Francis type
Francis type
Dam type
Tyrol intake
Rock-fill dam with clay core
Discharge
3
N/A
Available storage vol.
N/A
150 million m
N/A
Total storage volume
N/A
180 million m3
N/A
Banjica
Stalac
Sokolja
Nominal capacity
2.3 MW
11 MW
1.25 MW
Annual generation
12.0 GWh/year
48 GWh/year
6.6 GWh/year
Installed 45 m3/s ,
Installed 140 m3/s
Installed 0.92 m3/s
Number of turbines
2
2
2
Hydraulic turbines
Francis type
Kaplan type
Pelton type
Low concrete gravitation
dam
Low concrete gravitation dam
with rock-fill section
Available storage vol.
N/A
N/A
N/A
Total storage volume
N/A
N/A
N/A
HPP Name
Nominal head (m)
Discharge
Dam type
7m
Ministry of Energy, Development and Environmental Protection, Republic of Serbia
Japan International Cooperation Agency
3
NATIONALLY APPROPRIATE MITIGATION ACTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA
NAMA SHORT DESCRIPTION
Location
9 different locations as shown in the map below.
Figure 1 Location of HPPs
NAMA Implementing Entity
Public Enterprise Electric Power Industry of Serbia (EPS)
EPS is a 100% state-owned company whose main business include electric power generation and
distribution, distribution system management, electric power trade, coal production, processing and
transport, steam and hot water production in combined heating processes, water power utilization
and services in river and lake traffic, wholesale trade in fuel and similar products. EPS operations
also include research and development, design, construction and maintenance of energy and mining
plants, design, construction and operation of telecommunication facilities and engineering.
www.eps.rs
Ministry of Energy, Development and Environmental Protection, Republic of Serbia
Japan International Cooperation Agency
4
NATIONALLY APPROPRIATE MITIGATION ACTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA
NAMA SHORT DESCRIPTION
Implementing Schedule
The project consists of two phases:
Phase I: Construction of 6 small scale hydropower plants in the area of existing hydro facilities
Phase II: Construction of 3 small scale hydropower plants in the new locations
Expected starting date of Action
Information about Technical documentation and starting and finishing date of construction is given in the
table 3䚹
Table 3 Expected starting date of HPPs
No
HPP name
Expected timing of
construction
2014
Expected timing of
operation
2015
Status of preparation of documentation
1
Rovni
Conceptual design and Prefeasibility Study
2
Svrackovo
2013
2016
3
Jezero
2014
2015
Conceptual design and Prefeasibility Study
4
Mala Vrla 1
2014
2015
Conceptual design and Prefeasibility Study
5
Zavoj
2013
2014
Main design and Construction licence
6
W. s. Nis
2013
2014
Conceptual design and Prefeasibility Study
7
Banjica
N/A
N/A
2013 Preparation of Technical documentation
8
Stalac
N/A
N/A
2013 Preparation of Technical documentation
9
Sokolja
N/A
N/A
2013 Preparation of Technical documentation
Main design and Construction licence
Lifetime
40 years
Current Status
Explained in the Table 3 above.
Coverage
Sector: Renewable energy generation
GHG Gases: CO2
Ministry of Energy, Development and Environmental Protection, Republic of Serbia
Japan International Cooperation Agency
5
NATIONALLY APPROPRIATE MITIGATION ACTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA
NAMA SHORT DESCRIPTION
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Finance and Cost
Expected cost of preparation:
none (preparation and feasibility studies completed)
Feasibility study for 6 HPPs has been completed and for 3 HPPs will be prepared in 2013 (see Table
3). EPS will incur cost for feasibility studies of HPPs, and other necessary technical documentation.
Expected cost of implementation: EUR 54.684 million (for 9 HPPs)
Expected incremental cost of implementation:
none
Financial sources:
EPS equity and loan
Financial analysis:
Please find attachement for the financial analysis.
Simple payback period: 12.1 years
FIRR:
6.0% (for 40 years)
NPV:
- 9,130 EUR
INFORMATION ON SUPPORT REQUIRED
Description of Support Required
Financial
Support required for
Preparation
x
Technical
x
Capacity Building
x
Type of Support
Support required for
implementation
54.684 million EUR (soft loan): for
the initial investment cost for all 9
HPPs
x
Ministry of Energy, Development and Environmental Protection, Republic of Serbia
Japan International Cooperation Agency
x
6
NATIONALLY APPROPRIATE MITIGATION ACTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA
NAMA SHORT DESCRIPTION
EXPECTED GHG EMISSION REDUCTIONS AND MRV
Expected Mitigation Potential
Annual reduction: 102,343 tCO2e
Total reduction: 4,093,720 tCO2eq (40 years)
Methodologies and Assumptions (including BAU scenario)
Methodology: Approved CDM methodology, AMS-I.D. “Grid connected renewable electricity
generation” is applied to estimate emission reductions from the NAMA.
BAU scenario: new small HPPs (9 plants) are not constructed and instead grid-connected power
plants, mainly thermal power plants, continue operation and supply electricity to the grid.
Calculation of emission reductions:
BE
= EGbaseline * EFgrid
Where
BE
= baseline GHG emissions
EGbaseline
= electricity generation at baseline BAU case
EFgrid
= emission factor of the electricity grid
Data / Parameter
EGbaseline
Unit
MWh
Description
Quantity of electricity supplied to the grid by 9 HPPs which in the absence of the NAMA would have
been sourced from the grid
Value applied
108,3 MWh/yr
Source of data
Estimated based on the manufacturer’s specification and expected plant factor provided by NAMA
implementing entity
Comment
Plant factor varies on each HPP
Data / Parameter
EFgrid
Unit
t-CO2/MWh
Description
CO2 emission factor of the grid
Source of data
Official data provided by Serbian Ministry of Environment, Mining and Spatial Planning, which is a
Ministry of Energy, Development and Environmental Protection, Republic of Serbia
Japan International Cooperation Agency
7
NATIONALLY APPROPRIATE MITIGATION ACTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA
NAMA SHORT DESCRIPTION
Designated National Authority for CDM.
Value applied
Comment
0.945 tCO2/MWh
Emission factor was calculated in accordance with the CDM guidance “Tool to calculate the emission
factor for an electricity system” and Serbia’s official data was used. Simple OM calculation option is
applied for Operating Margin calculation. Data years are 2008, 2009, and 2010.
http://www.ekoplan.gov.rs/DNA/index_en.html
BE = 108,300 MWh * 0.945 tCO2/MWh
= 102,343 t-CO2eq
Measurement, Reporting, and Verification (MRV)
Monitoring Plan
Data and parameters to be monitored:
Following two parameters will be monitored in order to calculate emission reductions from the NAMA.
Data / Parameter
Unit
Description
Source of data
Measurement procedures
Monitoring frequency
QA/QC procedures
Data / Parameter
Unit
Description
Source of data
Measurement procedures
Monitoring frequency
QA/QC procedures
EGy
MWh
Quantity of electricity supplied to the grid by 9 HPPs
Operation centre at generation system
Measured continuously by electricity meter equipped at each of the HPPs and recorded
daily.
Monthly Compiled and aggregated data is recorded on computer.
The electricity meters will be periodically calibrated according to the relevant national
industrial standards and regulations. Meter readings will be compared to electricity sales
receipts.
EFgrid
t-CO2/MWh
CO2 emission factor of the grid
Official data provided by Serbian Ministry of Energy, Development and Environmental
Protection
Website of Serbian Ministry of Minister of Energy, Development and Environmental Protection
is checked for an update.
Yearly
No QA/QC necessary for this data item.
Monitoring plan and structure:
Monitoring of the data and parameters above will be conducted based on the EPS monitoring structure
shown below. Monitoring activities will be conducted by EPS, the NAMA implementing entity, based on its
ISO 9001:2008 certified quality management system.
Ministry of Energy, Development and Environmental Protection, Republic of Serbia
Japan International Cooperation Agency
8
NATIONALLY APPROPRIATE MITIGATION ACTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA
NAMA SHORT DESCRIPTION
Ministry of Energy, Development and Environmental Protection, Republic of Serbia
Japan International Cooperation Agency
9
NATIONALLY APPROPRIATE MITIGATION ACTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA
NAMA SHORT DESCRIPTION
Calibration * - Verification and benchmarking meters are calibrated by accredited Metrology laboratories,
which are acredited by the Accreditatation Body of Serbia (ATS).
The Distribution System Operator must take care that all meters in his ownership be verified and calibrated in
time and in the manner prescribed by the Law on Metrology, according to meters class.
All the meters for the calculation of generation / consumed electricity are ownership of Distribution system
operators, including meters in the HPPs. Monthly reading generation/consumption of electricity is done by
Distribution system operator on a monthly basis.
Reporting course:
x
After metering readings of electricity generation in HPPs, all Distribution system operators Distribution Subsidiaries submit monthly reports PE Electric Power Industry of Serbia, to Electricity
Trade Department for the calculation and payment of electricity delivered.
x
PE Electric Power Industry of Serbia, Electricity Trade Department, based on monthly reports at the
request of the common functions of PE Electric Power Industry of Serbia, Environmental Protection
section submit the data for delivered and calculated electricity production on a annually base from
HPP.
x
Common functions of PE Electric Power Industry of Serbia, Environmental Protection section include
CO2 emissions reduction calculation based on data obtained from Electricity Trade Department on an
annuall basis and deliver to General Manager of PE Electric Power Industry of Serbia/ Board of
Directors.
x
PE Electric Power Industry of Serbia submit CO2 Emission Reduction Monitoring Report to Verification
authorities.
Accuracy control:
x
Verification and calibration standards of meters shall be subject to such terms and in the manner
specified by regulatory law, by an accredited laboratory, on which a Distribution system operator shall
maintain proper records.
x
In case of conflict or doubt that there is a conflict in the read values assumed for calculation of
delivered electric energy, all participants in the generation, reading and calculation of electric energy
the HPP may request that the Commission establish the accuracy of the readings or calculated data, in
accordance with long-term contracts.
Considering the abundant experience of EPS in operating hydro projects, the current monitoring system
should be able to be applied to these 9 HPPs. Republic of Serbia soon will start the process of harmonization
with EU Emission trading system, that include MRV system.
Ministry of Energy, Development and Environmental Protection, Republic of Serbia
Japan International Cooperation Agency
10
NATIONALLY APPROPRIATE MITIGATION ACTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA
NAMA SHORT DESCRIPTION
Domestic MRV arrangements
Domestic MRV arrangement of Serbia is currently under development.
It is expected that under the Serbian domestic MRV system, a NAMA implementing entity is responsible
for the Measurement (M) and Reporting (R) activities, which will go through Verification (V) from third
party.
It is expected that the MRV of HPP NAMA will be conducted in the following manner.
1.
2.
EPS will conduct the Measurement activity based on the above-mentioned monitoring plan in order to
calculate the emission reductions achieved by the NAMA.
EPS will prepare a Report that contains information on 1) the detailed result of the monitoring
activities conducted based on the monitoring plan, 2) the result of emission reduction calculation
based on the above mentioned methodology, and 3) any support received under NAMA scheme from
Annex-I countries or international organization regarding financial support, technical support, or
support on capacity building.
OTHER INFORMATION
Contribution to Sustainable Development
“Energy Sector Development Strategy Of the Republic of Serbia by 2015“ lists in its priority activity, the
program of selective use of New Renewable Energy Sources, including small and mini hydropower plants
– facilities of up to 10 MW.
The NAMA is expected to contribute to sustainable development of Serbia and co-benefit in the following
manners.
- Utilization of renewable energy sources
- Reduction of impact on environment
- Creation of local employment opportunities
- Awareness raising among general public about clean energy
- Mittingation of CO2 emissions
Stakeholder consultation
EPS will conduct a public stakeholder consultation regarding the NAMA. At the consultation, objective and
outcome, expected impacts on local environment, employment opportunities, etc. will be presented to
stakeholders, and their comments will be collected and compiled.
EPS will take necessary due accounts to the comments received during the public consultation and report
the results.
Public consultation will be held either through website or meetings near the project site.
PE EPS regularly conducts a public consultation before commercial operation of HPPs, and that procedure will
be applied to new 9 HPPs projects. This procedure will be according to EIA Law and Law on information and
Law on implementation of Aarhus Convention.
Ministry of Energy, Development and Environmental Protection, Republic of Serbia
Japan International Cooperation Agency
11
NATIONALLY APPROPRIATE MITIGATION ACTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA
NAMA SHORT DESCRIPTION
CONTACT INFORMATION
NAMA Implementing Entity
Entity Name
Contact Person
Title
Phone
E-mail
Public Enterprise Electric Power Industry of Serbia (EPS)
Mr. Mihajlo Gavric
Manager of Environmental Protection
+381-11-20-24-631
[email protected]
Contact Person
Title
Phone
E-mail
Mr. Vladimir Djordjevic, Phd.
Executive director for renewable energy
+381-11-39-52-316
[email protected]
NAMA Coordinating Entity
Entity Name
Contact Person
Phone
E-mail
Ministry of Energy, Development, and Environmental
Protection
Climate Change Division
State Secretary: Mr. Vladan Zdravkovic
Head of Climate Change Division: Ms. Danijela Bozanic
+381-11-3131-355
[email protected]
Ministry of Energy, Development and Environmental Protection, Republic of Serbia
Japan International Cooperation Agency
12
NATIONALLY APPROPRIATE MITIGATION ACTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA
NAMA SHORT DESCRIPTION
Attachment: Financial Information
No
HPP Name
Location
Power
[MW]
Expected
Investment
production
[GWh/y]
k€
5.20
1,612
22.00
9,280
4.85
2,980
1.83
800
2.94
1,112
4.88
1,000
12.00
5,900
48.00
29,000
6.60
3,000
108.30
54,684
Yearly
Income
12Y FiT
k€
323.69
1,288.10
301.91
117.30
183.01
312.81
702.60
2,400.00
410.84
6,040.27
IRR
(40 years)
NPV
k€
1,756
1,800
-490
315
628
2,350
-135
-15,919
756
-9,130
Pay Back
Period
(years)
0.77
19.4%
8.0
Rovni
Valjevo
10.3%
10.2
7.65
Svrackovo
Arilje
Jezero
Surdulica
1.00
5.7%
12.9
Mala Vrla 1 Surdulica
0.47
12.9%
9.8
Zavoj
Pirot
0.58
14.6%
9.1
W. s, Nis
Nis
4.90
30.9%
6.2
7.7%
11.4
Sicevo
2.30
Banjica
Stalac
Stalac
11.00
1.3%
15.1
1.25
11.1%
10.3
Sokolja I&II Kraljevo
29.92
6.0%
12.1
Whole 9 Porjects
Assumptions:
Feed In Tariff is applied for the first 12 years of operation in accordance with the "Decree on Incentive Measures
1)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
for Elec tricity Generation Using Renewable Energy Sources and for Combined Heat and Power (CHP) Generation"
2) From the 13th year from operation, electricity sales price is set as 5 €C/kWh
3) Life time 40 yeas, O&M cost 5% of total investment, construction period 3 years
4) Discount rate; 8%
Ministry of Energy, Development and Environmental Protection, Republic of Serbia
Japan International Cooperation Agency
13
NATIONALLY APPROPRIATE MITIGATION ACTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA
NAMA SHORT DESCRIPTION
GENERAL INFORMATION
Title of NAMA
Introduction 1000 MW of small biomass boilers in Serbia
Description
Description of the Mitigation Action
The NAMA aims to install new biomass boilers totaling 1,000 MW that can provide around 3,150TJ of hear
energy for residential, commercial and industrial sectors throughout the country that will be fueled by either
wood waste (wood chips) or agricultural waste. Climate change mitigation will be achieved through
replacing the existing small inefficient boilers that are fuelled mainly by carbon-intensive coal, oil, natural
gas and grid electricity.
A domestic crediting mechanism will be developed as the tool to trigger private/public users to invest in new
high-efficient biomass boilers. The increase of biomass usage is strategic goal of the Government and it
would be promoted through donations and with loans with some incentives.
Technologies/measures
Boilers will be used for space heating, domestic hot water and technical purposes.
There are two projects that are expected to start during 2013 for creating biomass market in Serbia. One is
“Reducing Barriers to Accelerate the Development of Biomass Markets in Serbia” (UNDP, as implementing
agency of Global Environmental Fund – GEF) and the other is “Development of a Sustainable Bioenergy
Market in Serbia” (KfW and GIZ). Both projects will be realized with cooperation of competent Ministries of
Republic Serbia. Under these projects, biomass potential will be analyzed and barriers for implementation of
biomass projects in Serbia will be analyzed in detail. At second stages of these projects there will be an
established public-private company that would supply prepared biomass for use in boilers. In accordance
with available raw biomass, there should be standardized prepared biomass available on market.
The first stages of the projects consider making few pre-feasibility studies for creating sustainable biomass
market in some areas. According to the results of the pre-feasibility studies and existing experience, it will
be decided the optimal actions for installation 1000 MW of small biomass boilers in Serbia.
The potential for the biomass can be categorized as wood biomass and crop residues. The structure of
those potentials is shown in the table:
Ministry of Energy, Development and Environmental Protection, Republic of Serbia
Japan International Cooperation Agency
1
NATIONALLY APPROPRIATE MITIGATION ACTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA
NAMA SHORT DESCRIPTION
Table 1 Biomass potential in Serbia
Biomass source
Potential (ktoe)
Wood biomass
1,527
Fuel wood
Forest residue
Wood processing residue
1,150
163
179
Agricultural biomass
1,670
Crop residue
1,023
Residues from fruit growing,
605
viniculture and fruit processing
(Source: Biomass Action Plan for the Republic of Serbia 2010-2012)
Since some parts of this woody biomass potential are already being consumed (1059 ktoe), estimated
available biomass potential is more then 1500 ktoe. Estimated amount of consumption by 1000 MW boilers
is less then 100 ktoe, so the potential is sufficient enough to be an input for planned capacities.
It is expected that the existing boilers can be switched to biomass boilers or new biomass fired boilers can
be installed in total capacity of 1000 MW. Expected range of boiler capacity is 100 kW – 1000 kW with
average capacity of 250 kW. According to these expectations, total number of new biomass boilers should
be around 4,000. According to statistical analysis of boilers in use, it is expected that number of replaced
boilers should be in the next proportions:
Table 2 Type of boilers to be replaced by biomass boilers
Type of boilers
that will be
replaced
electrical
Number of
boilers
Boilers
in use, %
800
20
1200
30
gas
600
15
coal
1400
35
4000
100
oil
Total:
Construction activities differ from boiler to boiler. Depending on availability of biomass and local needs,
appropriate type of boiler will be used. Biomass boilers are bigger and need more space than fossil fuel
boilers, as well as requiring more storage space, and therefore the technical feasibility of each individual
installation needs to be examined.
Location
Boilers will be installed throughout Serbia. Serbia consists of 150 municipalities and every municipality will
be asked to determine few project locations if there are biomass available. There will be possibility and for
private initiatives so every potential investor will be able to apply for credit for locations where the project is
sustainable.
Ministry of Energy, Development and Environmental Protection, Republic of Serbia
Japan International Cooperation Agency
2
NATIONALLY APPROPRIATE MITIGATION ACTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA
NAMA SHORT DESCRIPTION
NAMA Implementing Entity
Final structure of the project has not yet been defined and it will be determined by the feasibility study.
However, it is expected that following actors may be involved.
Ministry of Energy, Development and Environmental Protection - MEDEP
Ministry of Energy, Development and Environmental Protection deals with the state administration affairs
with regard to: energy; energy balances of the Republic of Serbia; oil and gas industry; safe pipe transport of
gaseous and liquid hydrocarbons; nuclear power plants the purpose of which is the production of electric i.e.
thermal energy, the production, use and disposal of radioactive substances in these facilities; environmental
protection; taking measures to provide the conditions for public enterprises to operate in the fields for which the
Ministry was set up; supervision in the fields within the scope of the Ministry as well as other affairs stipulated by
law.
MEDEP will coordinate between all Entities. The unit for support of biomass project will be established.
Ministry will supervise SPC.
Municipality
Local governments will assist in finding potential sites for the replacement of boilers.
Special purpose company - SPC
SPC will be responsible for the collection of data on biomass consumed by boilers and creating reports for
reporting and verification. SPC could be partly financed through budget, but final decision will be made during
negotiations with potential financier.
Boiler owners
Boiler owners will conduct monitoring activities determined in NAMA by keeping track of biomass consumption
and to periodically send reports to SPC.
Implementing Schedule
Expected starting date of Action
Installation will start in 2015 and operation will start continuously. It is expected the installation be
finished in 2019.
Lifetime
25 years
Current Status
The contracts with GIZ and KfW for the project “Development of a Sustainable Bioenergy Market in
Serbia” will be signed by the end of 2012.
Preparation of documents for project and requests for funding a project “Reducing Barriers to Accelerate
the Development of Biomass Markets in Serbia” is in final stage. The decision on acceptance of the
project by the GEF is expected by the end of September 2013.
Ministry of Energy, Development and Environmental Protection, Republic of Serbia
Japan International Cooperation Agency
3
NATIONALLY APPROPRIATE MITIGATION ACTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA
NAMA SHORT DESCRIPTION
Coverage
Sector: renewable energy
GHG Gases: CO2
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Finance and Cost
Expected cost of preparation:
EUR 0.5 million
Expected cost of implementation:
EUR 250 million
Expected incremental cost of implementation:
N/A
Financial sources identified:
Ministry of Energy, Development and Environmental Protection is searching financial support from Annex-I
countries and international organizations through NAMA scheme. Development Bank of Serbia will be
intermediate and it could provide some sort of incentive.
Financial analysis:
Financial analysis is done without calculating value of CO2 and with discount rate 8%.
Simple payback period:
6.9 years
IRR:
12.9 %
NRV:
88 million EUR
INFORMATION ON SUPPORT REQUIRED
Description of Support Required
Type of Support
Financial
Support required for
preparation
x
Technical
Capacity Building
Support required for
implementation
250 million EUR for loans which will be
distributed as loans with some
incentives to the boiler owners.
500,000 EUR – support for feasibility
study in order to identify the project
sites and technical specifications
x
x
x
Ministry of Energy, Development and Environmental Protection, Republic of Serbia
Japan International Cooperation Agency
4
NATIONALLY APPROPRIATE MITIGATION ACTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA
NAMA SHORT DESCRIPTION
EXPECTED GHG EMISSION REDUCTIONS AND MRV
Expected Mitigation Potential
Annual reduction: 414,501 tCO2e
Total reduction: 10,362,525 tCO2e (25 years)
Methodologies and Assumptions
Methodologies: Approved CDM methodology, AMS-I.I. “Biogas/biomass thermal application for
households/small users”
BAU scenario: Small biomass boilers are not installed and instead technologies based on electricity, oil,
natural gas, coal continue producing thermal energy
Calculation of emission reduction
Calculation of emission reductions is done based on assumption that structure of replaced boilers will be
proportional to the current share of particular boiler types in use. The share of boiler types currently in use is
shown in section “Description” part of this document.
In accordance with selected methodology emission reductions are calculated using the formula:
¦
ER y
k
N k ,0 * nk , y * BS k , y * EF *K PJ / BL * NCVbiomass LE y
Where:
N k ,0
Number of thermal applications k commissioned
nk , y
Proportion of
BS k , y
The net quantity of renewable biomass or biogas consumed by the thermal
application k in year y (mass or volume units, dry basis)
EF
CO2 emission factor (tCO2/GJ)
K PJ / BL
Where:
x j is a fraction representing fuel type j used by the baseline thermal applications
displaced by biomass/biogas
Ratio of efficiencies of project equipment and baseline equipment (e.g. cook stove
using coal) measured once prior to validation applying the same test procedure (e.g.
lab test), as per a national or an international standard. Official data or scientific
literature can be used for cross-check purposes
NCVbiomass
Net calorific value of the biomass (GJ/unit mass or volume, dry basis).
EF
¦
j
N k ,0
that remain operating in year y (fraction)
x j * EFFF , j
Ministry of Energy, Development and Environmental Protection, Republic of Serbia
Japan International Cooperation Agency
5
NATIONALLY APPROPRIATE MITIGATION ACTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA
NAMA SHORT DESCRIPTION
Data /
Parameter
Description
Value applied
Data /
Parameter
Description
Value applied
Data /
Parameter
Unit
Description
Source of data
Value applied
Comment
Data /
Parameter
Unit
Description
Source of data
N k ,0
Number of thermal application k commissioned
1
nk , y
Proportion of N k , 0 that remain operating in year y
(fraction)
1
BS k , y
t
The net quantity of renewable biomass by the thermal
application k in year y (mass or volume units, dry basis)
Estimated value for heat production of 3150TJ
Value for each baseline fuel type k is estimated as
follows:
BSelectricity,y = 233,333 tons * 20% = 46,667t
BSoil,y
= 233,333 tons * 30% = 70,000t
BSgas,y
= 233,333 tons * 15% = 35,000t
BScoal,y
= 233,333 tons * 35% = 81,667t
The plan is to change boilers that are now producing
3150 TJ equivalent of energy with biomass boilers that
has the efficiency of 0.9.
Expected amount of biomass fuels used for the project is
calculated as follows:
3150 TJ / NCVbiomass /0.9 = 233,333 t
EF
tCO2/GJ
CO2 emission
Calculated according formula
EF
¦x
j
EFFF , j
Value applied
Comment
0.11595 tCO2/GJ
Weighted average of baseline fuel emission factors;
Electricity 0.2625 t-CO2/GJ
Oil 0.0774
Gas 0.0561
Coal 0.0909
Data /
K PJ / BL
Ministry of Energy, Development and Environmental Protection, Republic of Serbia
Japan International Cooperation Agency
6
NATIONALLY APPROPRIATE MITIGATION ACTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA
NAMA SHORT DESCRIPTION
Parameter
Unit
Description
Source of data
Value applied
Data /
Parameter
Unit
Description
Source of data
Value applied
Comment
Data /
Parameter
Unit
Description
Value applied
Comment
ER y
¦
k
1/1
Ratio of efficiencies of project equipment and baseline
equipment
Calculation based on general statistics
K PJ / BL
K PJ / BL
K PJ / BL
K PJ / BL
(electricity) = 0.9/ 1.0 = 0.9
(oil)
= 0.9/ 0.85 = 1.06
(gas)
= 0.9/ 0.9 = 1.0
(coal)
= 0.9/ 0.75 = 1.2
NCVbiomass
GJ/t
Net calorific value of the biomass (dry basis)
Literature:
- Austrian standard ONORM EN 14961-2 for pellet
defines NCV = 16,5 MJ/kg
- Austrian standard ONORM M 7133 for wood chips with
25% moisture defines NCV =14,4 MJ/kg
- Martinov M., Ĉurkov Ĉ., in article "ývrsta biomasa za
grejanje - ocena ekonomiþnosti" , in paper "Savremena
poljoprivredna tehnika" vol. 36, No 4, pp 382-386, 2100.
shows that NCV for wood residues with moisture 15% is
15MJ/kg
15 GJ/t
At this moment it is not possible to estimate share of
biomass types on the market, so value for the net
calorific value is taken from the literature.
LE y
tCO2
Leakage during the year y
0
The proposed action does not emit any leakage
emissions since the biomass boilers introduced by the
project activity will not be transferred to another
location.
N k ,0 * n k , y * BS k , y * EF *K PJ / BL * NCVbiomass LE y
= 0.11595 t-CO2/GJ * 15 GJ/t * (46,667t *0.9 + 70,000t * 1.05 + 35,000t * 1.0 + 81,667t *1.2) - 0
Calculated emission reduction is:
ER y
414,501 tCO2
Ministry of Energy, Development and Environmental Protection, Republic of Serbia
Japan International Cooperation Agency
7
NATIONALLY APPROPRIATE MITIGATION ACTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA
NAMA SHORT DESCRIPTION
Measurement, Reporting, and Verification (MRV)
Monitoring plan
Data and parameters to be monitored:
Following parameters will be monitored in order to calculate emission reduction from the NAMA.
Data / Parameter
Description
Source of data
Measurement
procedures
Monitoring
frequency
Data / Parameter
Description
Source of data
Measurement
procedures
Monitoring
frequency
Data / Parameter
Unit
Description
Source of data
Measurement
procedures
Monitoring
frequency
Comment
N k ,0
Number of thermal application k commissioned
MEDEP – NAMA implementing entity
At the time of installation all project activity system shall be
inspected and undergo acceptance testing for proper
compliance with specification. The installation date of each
system shall be recorded
Once, at the time of installation
nk , y
Proportion of N k , 0 that remain operating in year y
(fraction)
MEDEP – NAMA implementing entity
A statistically valid sample of the residences where the
systems are installed, with consideration, in the sampling
design, of occupancy and demographic differences can be
used to determine the percentage of systems operating, as
per the relevant requirements for sampling in the “General
guidelines for sampling and surveys for small-scale CDM
project activities.
2 years
BS k , y
t
The net quantity of renewable biomass by the thermal
application k in year y (mass or volume units, dry basis)
MEDEP – NAMA implementing entity
Data shall be collected for mass, moisture content, NCV of
briquettes that are supplied to users with an appropriate
sampling frequency. Cross-check with annual energy/mass
balance that is based on purchased/sold quantities and
stock
Monthly
Project entity could collect information on used quantity of
renewable biomass based on collected invoices for biomass.
Ministry of Energy, Development and Environmental Protection, Republic of Serbia
Japan International Cooperation Agency
8
NATIONALLY APPROPRIATE MITIGATION ACTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA
NAMA SHORT DESCRIPTION
Data / Parameter
Unit
Description
Source of data
Measurement
procedures
Monitoring
frequency
NCVbiomass
GJ/t
Net calorific value of the biomass (dry basis)
Laboratory
Measurement in laboratories according to relevant
national/international standards. Measure the NCV
based on dry biomass. Check the consistency of the
measurements by comparing the measurement results with
measurements from previous years, relevant data sources
(e.g. values in the literature, values used in the national
GHG inventory) and default values by the IPCC
Annually
Monitoring plan and structure:
Monitoring structure will be decided once the final structure of the project is defined.
The working concept of monitoring of the data and parameters above will be conducted based on
monitoring structure shown below:
Laboratory
Statistical data
Department RES*
Supervision
MEDEP
Special Purpose
Company - SPC
Supervision
Invoice
Invoice
Boiler owner
Boiler owner
Report
MRV
(Verification)
* RES: Department for Renewable Energy Sources
Ministry of Energy, Development and Environmental Protection, Republic of Serbia
Japan International Cooperation Agency
9
NATIONALLY APPROPRIATE MITIGATION ACTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA
NAMA SHORT DESCRIPTION
Responsibility of each key monitoring department is summarized below:
Implementing
entity
MEDEP, Department
for Renewable Energy
Sources
Special Purpose
Company - SPC
Function and responsibility
-
Boiler owner
-
Laboratory
-
Supervise the whole process
Control work of SPC
Control report before MRV
Check installations of boilers
Capture monitoring data from installation process identifying each
boiler by unique reference number and GPS tag.
Ensures that Project locations provide data
Ensures that all forms are filled correctly
Compile and analyze all the data and cross-check the reports
Elaborate an estimate of emission reduction in Monitoring Report
Regularly fill forms with data for: stack quantities, purchased/ sold
quantities
Send invoices for purchased/ sold biomass to SPC
Sampling and determining NCVbiomass for all biomass types on the
market.
Check the consistency of the measurements
Regularly submit data to SPC
Monitoring data collected during the installation and operation of the boilers will be stored in an electronic
data management system, or monitoring database. Monitoring of working boilers will be done on the
statistical sample. From this data, emissions reductions of this NAMA will be determined.
Domestic MRV arrangements
Domestic MRV arrangement of Serbia is currently under development
It is expected that under the Serbian domestic MRV system, a NAMA implementing entity is responsible for
the Measurement (M) and Reporting (R) activities, which will go through Verification (V) from third party.
Ministry of Energy, Development and Environmental Protection, Republic of Serbia
Japan International Cooperation Agency
10
NATIONALLY APPROPRIATE MITIGATION ACTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA
NAMA SHORT DESCRIPTION
OTHER INFORMATION
Contribution to Sustainable Development
Environmental
¾ This mitigation action will reduce Serbia’s greenhouse gas emissions over its lifetime
¾ Improvement of local environmental condition - wood waste and agricultural waste would be used for
heat generation
¾ Agricultural waste that may cause environmental problems, such as odor and waste management
problems for local residents and land owners, will be properly treated
Social
¾ Quality of life - New boilers have abilities for automation, so less time will be spent operating with
boilers
Economic
¾ This action will help develop rural economy - biomass market
¾ Creation of local employment opportunities
¾ Cost incurred in the purchase of fuel will be reduced through increased thermal efficiency
¾ Energy security - reducing dependence on imported fossil fuels.
Stakeholder consultation
The public will be informed about this project through various activity:
¾ Public institutions will be questionnaire directly or through local governments
¾ Investors will be informed through Chamber of Commerce and Industries of Serbia and its sections
¾ The whole activity will be accompanied through media with organizing forums and public discussions
Ministry of Energy, Development and Environmental Protection, Republic of Serbia
Japan International Cooperation Agency
11
NATIONALLY APPROPRIATE MITIGATION ACTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA
NAMA SHORT DESCRIPTION
CONTACT INFORMATION
NAMA Implementing Entity
Entity Name
Contact Person
Title
Phone
E-mail
Ministry of Energy, Development and Environmental
Protection
Predrag Milanovic
Advisor in the Department for Renewable Energy
+381-11-3346-755
[email protected]
NAMA Coordinating Entity
Entity Name
Contact Person
Phone
E-mail
Ministry of Energy, Development, and Environmental
Protection
Climate Change Division
State Secretary: Mr. Vladan Zdravkovic
Head of Climate Change Division: Ms. Danijela Bozanic
+381-11-3131-355
[email protected]
Ministry of Energy, Development and Environmental Protection, Republic of Serbia
Japan International Cooperation Agency
12
NATIONALLY APPROPRIATE MITIGATION ACTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA
NAMA SHORT DESCRIPTION
GENERAL INFORMATION
Title of NAMA
REHABILITATION OF ARTERIAL ROADS IN SERBIA
Description
Description of the Mitigation Action
This NAMA represents rehabilitation of the 19 different arterial road sections throughout the country.
Total length of all proposed road sections is 324 km. Project introduce rehabilitation of roads as a
way to mitigate the intensity of carbon emissions for transport projects.
Mitigation target is to improve the efficiency and operation of Serbian roads and reduce CO2 emissions
from road vehicles. Decreasing of CO2 emissions will be ensured through improved fuel consumption
level (-3.64%) by all vehicles that is achieved by running speed of 60 km/h, or the International
Roughness Index (IRI) of the proposed roads are improved up to the value of 2.0 m/km.
This NAMA will contribute to climate change mitigation as the traffic on rehabilitated roads (highly
efficient traffic) emit less GHG than traffic performed on proposed road sections which currently are
in very poor condition. According to the studies developed by Asian Development Bank (ADB),
periodic road maintenance projects have a major impact on carbon emissions reductions in transport
sector. Road maintenance projects also ensure reducing of road user costs, discomfort, pollution and
travel time delays.
In order to ensure full control in project implementation, it is planned to establish a Project
Implementation Team (PIT) within the Sector for Investment of Public Enterprise “Roads of Serbia”
(PERS). PIT will be incharged for fully implementation of the project.
Technologies/ measures
Based on following facts:
x
Traffic management and speed optimization can cut CO2 emissions. Reductions in CO2 of about
20% can be obtained by techniques to mitigate congestion, manage excess speeds, and smooth
traffic flow. Road maintenance projects can significantly reduce Carbon Dioxide Emission Rates.1
x
An uneven road can increase fuel consumption by up to 12% relative to an even road. A rough
macrotexture may increase fuel consumption by 7% relative to a very smooth macrotexture. Fuel
consumption for a car may be influenced as much as 12% by road surface characteristics within
the tested range.2
Optimal maintenance of roads is a tool to reduce fuel consumption and greenhouse gas emission.
Reducing the rolling resistance loss can contribute significantly to the overall fuel need: the smoother
the road, the lower the fuel consumption!3
1
ADB Evaluation Study - Reducing Carbon Emissions from Transport Projects, July 2010
2
Eurobitume & European Asphalt Pavement Association (EAPA), Industry Report, Study in Sweden, March 2004
(Eurobitume was established as an international association in 1969, to provide a forum for bitumen producers to
share and develop technical and scientific information.)
3
EAPA & EUROBITUME, Environmental Impacts and Fuel Efficiency of Road Pavements, March 2004
Ministry of Energy, Development and Environmental Protection, Republic of Serbia
Japan International Cooperation Agency
1
NATIONALLY APPROPRIATE MITIGATION ACTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA
NAMA SHORT DESCRIPTION
PERS decided to candidate rehabilitation of 19 arterial roads in Serbia as an appropriate NAMA from
Serbian transport sector. PERS selected roads sections which are very important for everyday
transport of humans and goods in their regions, but with serious damages on the road surface
(pavement) and very high Roughness Index (IRI). The International Roughness Index (IRI) is the
roughness index most commonly obtained from measured longitudinal road profiles. It is calculated
using a quarter-car vehicle math model, whose response is accumulated to yield a roughness index
with units of slope (in/mi, m/km, etc.).[1] Since its introduction in 1986,[2] IRI has become the road
roughness index most commonly used worldwide for evaluating and managing road systems.All
proposed arterial road sections could be considered as uneven road. Average of their current IRI is
7.85 m/km. High values of IRI caused higher fuel consumption4 and higher emissions of CO25.
arterial road section
4
Lenghth
AADT
IRI
[km]
[veh/day]
[m/km]
Pirot - Sukovo
14,627
4.355
6,05
Loznica 5 - Zavlaka 2 (Likodra) (0184-0187)
27,345
4.498
5,70
Zavlaka 2 (Likodra) - Valjevska Kamenica (0188-0191)
27,008
2.319
5,28
Despotovac 2 (Manastir Manasija) - Dvorište
7,063
1.269
7,91
Prijepolje - Sjenica 3 (Medare) (0337-1, 0340)
17,711
2.636
7,74
Sušica - Dojevice (0344,0345)
30,155
3.427
6,56
granica APKiM (Mutivode) - Maüedonce (0348-0349)
20,485
700
7,59
Negosavlje - Krivaþa
17,897
1.660
6,33
Leskovac 5 (Bratmilovci) - Nomanica (km 2.595 - 5.238)
5,480
4.451
6,73
Vlasotince - Svoÿe
15,850
3.593
5,33
Svoÿe - Babušnica (0366,0367)
21,358
1.780
7,45
Babušnica - Donji Striževac
4,405
1.600
6,29
Donji Striževac - Sadikov Bunar (0369,0370)
19,693
1.615
10,71
Valjevo 5 (obilaznica) - Kaona (0464,0465)
28,802
3.377
5,78
Duga Poljana - Karajukiüa Bunari (0.0-6.3km)
6,319
800
16,77
Duga Poljana - Karajukiüa Bunari (6.3-22.4km)
16,081
800
16,77
Petrovaradin 6 - Inÿija 1 (Novi Karlovci) (05932-0595)
14,780
5.255
6,17
Bukovo 2 - Negotin 1 (0687,0688)
5,077
1.693
7,04
Beloljin - Rudare (0735,0736)
24,088
2.123
6,93
ADB, 2009. Green Transport – Resource Optimization in the Road Sector in the People’s Republic of
China
5
National Highway Authority of India project documents and reports from Salem – Namakkai highwa
Ministry of Energy, Development and Environmental Protection, Republic of Serbia
Japan International Cooperation Agency
2
NATIONALLY APPROPRIATE MITIGATION ACTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA
NAMA SHORT DESCRIPTION
Project technology comprise routine maintenance of proposed road sections which will ensure
desired level of service, smoother roads, increasing of average transport speed to the optimal level
(up to 80 km/h) and decreasing of fuel consumption and CO2 emissions.
Location
Proposed road sections are located in different part of Serbia. Most of them belong to the
southern-east region. Seven of them are located along arterial M-9S road, connecting Kosovo border,
Leskovac and Pirot. Two more road section is located within the same region (Beloljin - Rudare on
arterial road M-25S and Pirot – Sukovo on arterial road M-1.12S)
Four road sections are located in southern-west part of Serbia. Two of them are located on M-8S
Novi Pazar – Sjenica – Prijepolje arterial road. Remaining two road sections (M-21.1S Duga Poljana –
Karajukica Bunari) are excluded from Serbian arterial road network by Government Decree during
2012.
Three road sections are located on western Serbia (M-4S Loznica – Zavlaka, M-4S Zavlaka –
Valjevska Kamenica and M-21S Valjevo – Kaona)
Road section M-22.1V Petrovaradin – Indjija is located in northern part of Serbia, Autonomous
Province of Vojvodina.
Two remaining road sections are located in eastern Serbia. Road section M-24S Bukovo – Negotin is
located close to Romanian Border. Last road section M-4S Despotovac – Dvoriste is also excluded
from Serbian arterial road network by Government Decree during 2012.
All proposed road sections, except the ones which are excluded from arterial road network are shown
on Picture No. 1 – State Road Network NAMA Program.
Overview of proposed road sections is shown within the following table:
Ministry of Energy, Development and Environmental Protection, Republic of Serbia
Japan International Cooperation Agency
3
NATIONALLY APPROPRIATE MITIGATION ACTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA
NAMA SHORT DESCRIPTION
N°
Name
Length
(km)
Cost
(EUR)
Location
1
M-1.12S (0140) Pirot – Sukovo
14.6
5.032.000,00
Pirot
2
M-4S (0184-0187) Loznica 5 Zavlaka 2 (Likodra)
27.3
11.812.000,00
Loznica
3
M-4S (0188-0191) Zavlaka 2
(Likodra) – Valjevska Kamenica
27.0
12.973.000,00
Zavlaka
4
M-4S (0236) Despotovac 2
(Manastir Manasija) – Dvoriste
7.1
3.329.000,00
Despotovac
5
M-8S (0337,3-0340) Prijepolje Sjenica 3 (Medare)
17.7
8.278.000,00
Prijepolje
6
M-8S (0344-0345) Susica Dojevice
30.2
13.564.000,00
Susica
7
M-9S (0348-0349) granica
APKiM (Mutivode) – Macedonce
20.5
11.087.000,00
Macedonce
8
M-9S (0351) Negosavlje –
Krivaca
17.9
9.140.000,00
Leskovac
9
M-9S (0361-0363) Leskovac 5
(Bratmilovci) – Nomanica
8.1
3.790.000,00
Leskovac
10
M-9S (0365) Vlasotince –
Svodje
15.9
7.244.000,00
Vlasotince
11
M-9S (0366-0367) Svodje –
Babusnica
21.4
9.321.000,00
Babusnica
12
M-9S (0368) Babusnica - Donji
Strizevac
4.4
1.836.000,00
Babusnica
13
M-9S (0369-0370) Donji
Strizevac – Pirot
19.7
8.131.000,00
Pirot
14
M-21S (0464-0465) Valjevo 5
(obilaznica) – Kaona
28.8
14.868.000,00
Valjevo
15
M-21.1S (0490-1) Duga Poljana
- Karajukica Bunari
6.3
3.095.000,00
Duga Poljana
15.8
12.831.000,00
Duga Poljana
14.8
7.902.000,00
Novi Sad
5.1
2.149.000,00
Negotin
24.1
12.201.000,00
Beloljin
16
17
18
19
M-21.1S (0490-2) Duga Poljana
- Karajukica Bunari
M-22.1V (0593,2-0595)
Petrovaradin 6 - Indjija 1 (Novi
Karlovci)
M-24S (0687-0688) Bukovo 2 Negotin 1
M-25S (0735-0736) Beloljin –
Rudare
TOTAL:
297.5 139.328.000
Ministry of Energy, Development and Environmental Protection, Republic of Serbia
Japan International Cooperation Agency
4
NATIONALLY APPROPRIATE MITIGATION ACTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA
NAMA SHORT DESCRIPTION
17
2
3
5
18
4
14
15
16
13
6
12
19
8
9
10
1
11
7
Figure 1: State Road Network - NAMA Program
Ministry of Energy, Development and Environmental Protection, Republic of Serbia
Japan International Cooperation Agency
5
NATIONALLY APPROPRIATE MITIGATION ACTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA
NAMA SHORT DESCRIPTION
NAMA Implementing Entity
PE “Roads of Serbia” - PERS
Pursuant to the Law on Public Roads (The Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia, No. 101-05),
PERS is established for managing state roads. (see Annex 01 to this document).
PERS is responsible for maintenance, protection, usage, development and management of state
roads of I and II category in the Republic of Serbia. Tasks of primary national importance are set for
the PERS in the area of preservation, further construction and improvement of the road network in
the Republic of Serbia.
Financing of construction and reconstruction, maintenance and protection of public roads is provided
from:
x
x
x
x
Fee for using state road - toll
Financial loans
Budget of the Republic of Serbia
Other sources pursuant to the Law
Implementing Schedule
Time span
Activity
2013 – 2015
Preparatory period
2016 – 2020
Implementation
19 Main Designs for proposed road rehabilitation projects, including
Technical Review, obtaining the necessary approvals from the relevant
institutions, preparation of tender documents, bidding and contracting
procedures and other necessary activities. Purchasing of necessary
equipment for CO2 monitoring and zero monitoring measurement.
rehabilitation of proposed roads, supervision activities, CO2 monitoring
activities, technical acceptance.
Expected starting date of Action
Start date:
End date:
2013
2020
Lifetime
20 years
Current Status
Poor condition of pavement on proposed road sections caused many problems related with traffic safety and
congestion. Carbon monitoring program is not established yet, but first monitoring activities will start
immediately after signing Contract between PERS and International Financing Institution which will funded
(partially or in total) Serbian Arterial Road Rehabilitation Project.
Proposed road sections are planned to be rehabilitated according to routine maintenance plan. Lack of
financial means caused serious damaging of existing pavement on proposed road sections. Roughness index
Ministry of Energy, Development and Environmental Protection, Republic of Serbia
Japan International Cooperation Agency
6
NATIONALLY APPROPRIATE MITIGATION ACTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA
NAMA SHORT DESCRIPTION
become much higher that is acceptable (8-16) which caused very low level of service on proposed roads.
Devastation of proposed road section caused many traffic safety and environmental problems. Low levels of
average transport speed increased fuel consumption and CO2 emissions on proposed road sections.
Summarizing above mentioned facts, PERS has undertaken many different activities in order to analyze
possible project benefits which can be achieved through the rehabilitation of proposed road sections. Activities
already completed are:
x
x
x
x
Feasibility Study is completed by using HDM-4 Model. Most important figures (feasibility data,
economic analysis, estimated Costs) and conclusions are presented within this Short Description. Road
database is already prepared by PERS as a source of relevant data (AADT, vehicle by type, IRI)
Roughness detection is measured on each road section during 2009 with special vehicle type ARAN
Data for each section were taken from “Program Analyses of State Road Network”, PERS, 2011. Data
analyzed by using software HDM-4 and HIMS
Fuel consumption on proposed road sections estimated by using COPERT 4 Model
Coverage
Sector: Transport
Transport-sector CO2 emissions represent 23% (globally) and 30% (OECD) of overall CO2 emissions from
Fossil fuel combustion. The sector accounts for approximately 15% of overall greenhouse gas emissions.
Automobile transport is the principal CO2 emitter.
Road sector emissions dominate transport emissions with light-duty vehicles accounting for the bulk of
emissions globally. In certain ITF member countries for which estimates can be made, road freight accounts
for up to 30% to 40% of road sector CO2 emissions.
GHG Gases: CO2
Global CO2 emissions from transport are expected to continue to grow by approximately 40% from
2007 to 2030 – though this is lower than pre-crisis estimates.
Ministry of Energy, Development and Environmental Protection, Republic of Serbia
Japan International Cooperation Agency
7
NATIONALLY APPROPRIATE MITIGATION ACTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA
NAMA SHORT DESCRIPTION
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Finance and Cost
Expected cost of preparation:
Feasibility study: NONE (this document is already completed)
Design: 3.5 mil €
Expected cost of implementation:
Works: 139.328 mil €
Supervising: 3.5 mil €
Expected incremental cost of implementation:
None
Financial sources identified:
N/A
Serbian Arterial Road Rehabilitation Project is planned to be primarily financed as a Grant.
However, it can be financed by Loan too, but under specific conditions which should be a subject of
potential Negotiations between PERS and Financial Institutions which will consider possibility to
finance this Project. PERS is searching financial support from Annex-I countries and international
organizations through NAMA scheme. Development Bank of Serbia will be intermediate and it could
provide some sort of incentive.
Financial analysis:
Based on a Serbian road database and executed measurement of the road characteristics, for the
benefit of PERS, a Program Analyses of State Road Network and Transport Rehabilitation Project
Performance Indicators (World Bank Project, Contract No. WBC/ICS-PA/2010-05) was done.
Program Analyses (PA) was done on the network level. Through PA it is confirmed justification of the
investment in the respective nominated projects. The data presented in the accompanying tables are
presented based on abovementioned PA.
N°
Name
Length
(km)
Cost
(EUR)
NPV
mil €
EIRR
%
NPV/
CAP
1
M-1.12S (0140) Pirot – Sukovo
14.6
5.032.000,00
16.42
59.9
4.37
2
M-4S (0184-0187) Loznica 5 Zavlaka 2 (Likodra)
27.3
11.812.000,00
10.97
27.8
1.25
3
M-4S (0188-0191) Zavlaka 2
(Likodra) – Valjevska Kamenica
27.0
12.973.000,00
.366
10.7
0.04
4
M-4S (0236) Despotovac 2
(Manastir Manasija) – Dvoriste
7.1
3.329.000,00
1.466
20.0
0.59
Ministry of Energy, Development and Environmental Protection, Republic of Serbia
Japan International Cooperation Agency
8
NATIONALLY APPROPRIATE MITIGATION ACTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA
NAMA SHORT DESCRIPTION
N°
Name
Length
(km)
Cost
(EUR)
NPV
mil €
EIRR
%
NPV/
CAP
5
M-8S (0337,3-0340) Prijepolje Sjenica 3 (Medare)
17.7
8.278.000,00
7.707
28.8
1.25
6
M-8S (0344-0345) Susica - Dojevice
30.2
13.564.000,00
10.21
24.9
1.01
7
M-9S (0348-0349) granica APKiM
(Mutivode) – Macedonce
20.5
11.087.000,00
-2.739
1.5
-0.40
8
M-9S (0351) Negosavlje – Krivaca
17.9
9.140.000,00
0.736
12.0
0.11
9
M-9S (0361-0363) Leskovac 5
(Bratmilovci) – Nomanica
8.1
3.790.000,00
5.613
36.5
1.99
10
M-9S (0365) Vlasotince – Svodje
15.9
7.244.000,00
1.569
14.9
0.29
11
M-9S (0366-0367) Svodje –
Babusnica
21.4
9.321.000,00
3.359
17.9
0.48
12
M-9S (0368) Babusnica - Donji
Strizevac
4.4
1.836.000,00
1.091
20.9
0.80
13
M-9S (0369-0370) Donji Strizevac –
Pirot
19.7
8.131.000,00
9.795
33.6
1.62
14
M-21S (0464-0465) Valjevo 5
(obilaznica) – Kaona
28.8
14.868.000,00
3.744
15.9
0.34
15
M-21.1S (0490-1) Duga Poljana Karajukica Bunari
6.3
3.095.000,00
0.477
14.4
0.21
15.8
12.831.000,00
5.374
17.0
0.60
14.8
7.902.000,00
9.721
32.9
1.65
5.1
2.149.000,00
0.236
12.7
0.15
24.1
12.201.000,00
6.400
21.3
0.70
297.5
139.328.000
136.731
23.2
16
17
18
19
M-21.1S (0490-2) Duga Poljana Karajukica Bunari
M-22.1V (0593,2-0595)
Petrovaradin 6 - Indjija 1 (Novi
Karlovci)
M-24S (0687-0688) Bukovo 2 Negotin 1
M-25S (0735-0736) Beloljin –
Rudare
TOTAL:
Ministry of Energy, Development and Environmental Protection, Republic of Serbia
Japan International Cooperation Agency
9
NATIONALLY APPROPRIATE MITIGATION ACTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA
NAMA SHORT DESCRIPTION
INFORMATION ON SUPPORT REQUIRED
Description of Support Required
Type of Support
Financial
Support required for
preparation
Support required for
implementation
3,500,000 €
139,328,000 €
establishing of appropriate CO2
monitoring technology and
monitoring equipment
Technical
It must be corresponding to the
“Monitoring plan and structure”
part of this document; who will
purchase monitoring equipment
and who will perform monitoring
transfer of knowledge (knowledge
on relation between GHG emission
reduction and road rehabilitation
projects, appropriate monitoring
tools etc.), study tours (in order to
Capacity Building
collect information hoe monitoring
og GHG emission is working in
countries which already
established such activities as a
consisting part of road
management), strengthening of
PERS monitoring capacity
Ministry of Energy, Development and Environmental Protection, Republic of Serbia
Japan International Cooperation Agency
10
NATIONALLY APPROPRIATE MITIGATION ACTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA
NAMA SHORT DESCRIPTION
EXPECTED GHG EMISSION REDUCTIONS AND MRV
Expected Mitigation Potential
Annual reduction: 2,138
tCO2e
Total reduction:
tCO2e (20 years)
46,360
Methodologies and Assumptions (including BAU scenario)
Methodologies:
PERS used a Computer Programme to calculate Emissions from Road Transport (COPERT)
methodology for calculating CO2 emissions from proposed road sections.
COPERT 4 is a software tool used world-wide to calculate air pollutant and greenhouse gas emissions
from road transport. The development of COPERT is coordinated by the European Environment
Agency (EEA), in the framework of the activities of the European Topic Centre for Air Pollution and
Climate Change Mitigation. The European Commission's Joint Research Centre manages the scientific
development of the model. COPERT has been developed for official road transport emission
inventory preparation in EEA member countries. However, it is applicable to all relevant research,
scientific and academic applications.
The COPERT 4 methodology is part of the EMEP/EEA air pollutant emission inventory guidebook for
the calculation of air pollutant emissions and is consistent with the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for the
calculation of greenhouse gas emissions. The use of a software tool to calculate road transport
emissions allows for a transparent and standardized, hence consistent and comparable data
collecting and emissions reporting procedure, in accordance with the requirements of international
conventions and protocols and EU legislation.
COPERT 4 draws its origins in a methodology developed by a working group which was set up
explicitly for this purpose in 1989 (COPERT 85). This was then followed by COPERT 90 (1993),
COPERT II (1997) and COPERT III (1999). The current version is a synthesis of results of several
large-scale activities and dedicated projects, such as:
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
Dedicated projects funded by the Joint Research Centre / Transport and Air Quality Unit
The annual work-programme of the European Topic Centre for Air Pollution and Climate Change
Mitigation (ETC/ACM)
The European Research Group on Mobile Emission Sources (ERMES) work programme.
The MEET project (Methodologies to Estimate Emissions from Transport), a European Commission (DG
VII) sponsored project within 4th Framework Program (1996-1998)
The PARTICULATES project (Characterization of Exhaust Particulate Emissions from Road Vehicles), a
European Commission (DG Transport) PROJECT within the 5th Framework Program (2000-2003)
The ARTEMIS project (Assessment and Reliability of Transport Emission Models and Inventory
Systems), a European Commission (DG Transport) PROJECT within the 5th Framework Program
(2000-2007)
A joint JRC/CONCAWE/ACEA project on fuel evaporation from gasoline vehicles (2005-2007)
Emission factor work conducted by the HBEFA group.
Ministry of Energy, Development and Environmental Protection, Republic of Serbia
Japan International Cooperation Agency
11
NATIONALLY APPROPRIATE MITIGATION ACTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA
NAMA SHORT DESCRIPTION
Methodology Outline
COPERT 4 estimates emissions of all major air pollutants (CO, NOx, VOC, PM, NH3, SO2, heavy
metals) produced by different vehicle categories (passenger cars, light commercial vehicles, heavy
duty trucks, busses, motorcycles, and mopeds) as well as greenhouse gas emissions (CO2, N2O,
CH4). It also provides speciation for NO/NO2, elemental carbon and organic matter of PM and
non-methane VOCs, including PAHs and POPs.
Emissions are produced from two sources: Engine emissions, distinguished into those produced
during thermally stabilized engine operation (hot emissions), and emissions occurring during engine
start from ambient temperature (cold-start and warming-up effects). Diffuse emissions, i.e. NMVOC
emissions due to fuel evaporation and non-exhaust PM emissions from tires and break wear. Total
emissions are calculated as a product of activity data provided by the user and speed-dependent
emission factors calculated by the software.
The software application of COPERT 4 methodology has been developed for the compilation of
national inventories (i.e. NUTS 0) on a yearly basis. However, it has been shown that the
methodology can also be used with a sufficient degree of certainty at a higher resolution too, i.e. for
the compilation of urban emission inventories with a spatial resolution of 1×1 km2 and a temporal
resolution of 1 hour.
In order to estimate exhaust emissions from internal combustion engines used in off-road
applications (agriculture, forestry, household, industry, waterways and railways) one must still use
the separate module of COPERT III.
Based on the methodology of COPERT Tier 1, 2 and 3, calculation of CO2 emission of baseline was
conducted as follows.
ECO2 =
Where;
EcO2
-Emission of CO2
[g]
-Fuel Consumption [kg] fuel type m ; vehicle category j
-Emission Factor
[g/kg] fuel type m ; vehicle category j
Vehicle categories (j) contain five vehicle categories (passenger car, light trucks, heavy trucks,
motorcycles and mopeds) and vehicle technology (k) includes 7 categories (conventional, Euro 1,
Euro 2, Euro 3, Euro 4, Euro 5 and Euro 6). Fuel types (m) include 5 categories(petrol, diesel, LPGa,
LPGb and NG).
FCj,m [kg] is estimated by the following equation;
FCj,m =m㹙N
j,k
* M j,k * FC
j,k
/n㹛
Where;
FC
j,m
Fuel Consumption, [kg],fuel type m; vehicle category j
Ministry of Energy, Development and Environmental Protection, Republic of Serbia
Japan International Cooperation Agency
12
NATIONALLY APPROPRIATE MITIGATION ACTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA
NAMA SHORT DESCRIPTION
N
j,k
Number of vehicle with vehicle technology k, fuel type m, vehicle category j
M j,k
Av. annual single vehicle trip, [km/veh], vehicle technol. k, fuel type m, vehicle category j
FC
Fuel Consumption Factor, [g/km], vehicle technol. k, fuel type m, vehicle category j
n
j,k
Fuel consumption efficiency by IRI
Fuel consumption will be affected by roughness of the road. Fuel consumption efficiency by IRI was
reported by Asian Development Bank, based on statistical data of impact on road roughness on fuel
consumption. Impact on fuel consumption (fuel efficiency by IRI) is shown in the following Table.
BAU scenario:
Poor condition of pavement on proposed arterial road sections remains the same and fossil fuel
consumption will remain large as the vehicles are forced to move slowly. Additional deterioration of
proposed road section will cause increased fuel consumption and increased CO2 emissions.
Calculation of emission reduction
Baseline emission
Baseline emission was calculated as follows.
BECO2 = j (m ( FC
= j (m ( N
j,m
j,k
* EF
j,m))
* D j,k* FCF
j,k
/ nB *EF
j,m))
Ministry of Energy, Development and Environmental Protection, Republic of Serbia
Japan International Cooperation Agency
13
NATIONALLY APPROPRIATE MITIGATION ACTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA
NAMA SHORT DESCRIPTION
Where;
BE CO2
Baseline Emission of CO2 [kg]
FC
Fuel Consumption, [kg], fuel type m; vehicle category j
j,m
N
j,k
Number of vehicle with vehicle technology k, fuel type m, vehicle category j
M
j,k
Av. annual single vehicle trip, [km/veh], vehicle technol. k, fuel type m, vehicle category j
FCF
j,k
Fuel consumption efficiency by baseline IRI
nB
EF
Fuel Consumption Factor, [g/km], vehicle technol. k, fuel type m, vehicle category j
j,m
Emission Factor [kg CO2/kg] fuel type m; vehicle category j
Fuel Consumption Factor [g/km] by vehicle category, vehicle technology, engine capacity and speed
range is provided by COPERT 4 version 9.1, Tire 3 method. For calculation of Baseline emission, Fuel
Consumption Factor in vehicle speed 60km/h was used.
CO2 Emission Factors (EFj,m) by fuel type are shown in following table:
Fuel
kg of CO2 per kg of fuel
Petrol
3,180
Diesel
3,140
LPG
3,017
NG
2,750
Source: EMEP/EEA emission inventory Guidebook 2009, updated May 2012
Ministry of Energy, Development and Environmental Protection, Republic of Serbia
Japan International Cooperation Agency
14
NATIONALLY APPROPRIATE MITIGATION ACTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA
NAMA SHORT DESCRIPTION
Project emission
Project CO2 emission was calculated as follows.
PECO2 = j (m ( FC
= j (m ( N
j,m
j,k
* EF j,m))
*D
j,k
*FCFj,k / np *EF
j,m))
PE
CO2
Project Emission of CO2 [kg]
FC
j,m
Fuel Consumption, [kg],fuel type m; vehicle category j
N
j,k
Number of vehicle with vehicle technology k, fuel type m, vehicle category j
M
j,k
Av. annual single vehicle trip, [km/veh], vehicle technol. k, fuel type m, vehicle category j
FCF
n
j,k
Fuel Consumption Factor, [g/km], vehicle technol. k, fuel type m, vehicle category j
P
Fuel consumption efficiency by Project IRI (IRI=2.0, np=1)
EF j,m
Emission Factor [kg CO2/kg] fuel type m; vehicle category j
Fuel Consumption Factor [g/km] by vehicle category, vehicle technology, engine capacity and speed
range is provided by COPERT 4 version 9.1, Tire 3 method. For calculation of Baseline emission, Fuel
Consumption Factor in vehicle speed 60km/h was used.
Data / Parameter
Unit
Description
Source of data
Value applied
Comment
Data / Parameter
Unit
Description
Source of data
Value applied
Comment
N j,k
vehicle
Number of vehicle with vehicle technology k, fuel type m,
vehicle category j
Database of Road of Serbia (Annual vehicle number in each
road section)
National Statistical Data (The ratio of vehicle technology k,
vehicle category j in all roads of Serbia)
Annual vehicle number with vehicle technology k, vehicle
category j is not monitored in each road section.
The ratio of vehicle technology k, vehicle category j is
multiplied to annual vehicle number in each road section.
M j,k
km/veh
Average of annual single vehicle trip
Database of Road of Serbia
Average of annual single vehicle trip is same as length of
each road section
Ministry of Energy, Development and Environmental Protection, Republic of Serbia
Japan International Cooperation Agency
15
M034
M035
M053
M095
M098
M100
M102
M104
M106
M107
M108
M109
M143
M157
0
M176
M210
M227
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
Babušnica - Donji Striževac
Donji Striževac - Sadikov Bunar
(0369,0370)
Valjevo 5 (obilaznica) - Kaona
(0464,0465)
Duga Poljana - Karajukiüa
Bunari (0.0-6.3km)
Duga Poljana - Karajukiüa
Bunari (6.3-22.4km)
Petrovaradin 6 - Inÿija 1 (Novi
Karlovci) (05932-0595)
Bukovo
2
Negotin
1
(0687,0688)
Beloljin - Rudare (0735,0736)
324
24
5
15
16
6
29
20
4
21
-
2,123
1,693
5,255
800
800
3,377
1,615
1,600
1,780
3,593
4,451
5
16
1,660
700
3,427
2,636
1,269
2,319
4,498
4,355
18
20
30
18
7
27
27
15
[veh/day]
[km]
-
6.93
7.04
6.17
16.77
16.77
5.78
10.71
6.29
7.45
5.33
6.73
6.33
7.59
6.56
7.74
7.91
5.28
5.70
6.05
[m/km]
IRI
(Baseline)
Ministry of Energy, Development and Environmental Protection, Republic of Serbia
Japan International Cooperation Agency
Total
Pirot - Sukovo
Loznica 5 - Zavlaka 2 (Likodra)
(0184-0187)
Zavlaka 2 (Likodra) - Valjevska
Kamenica (0188-0191)
Despotovac
2
(Manastir
Manasija) – Dvorište
Prijepolje - Sjenica 3 (Medare)
(0337-1, 0340)
Sušica - Dojevice (0344,0345)
granica APKiM (Mutivode) Maüedonce (0348-0349)
Negosavlje - Krivaþa
Leskovac 5 (Bratmilovci) Nomanica (km 2.595 - 5.238)
(0361-0363)
Vlasotince - Svoÿe
M017
1
Svoÿe - Babušnica (0366,0367)
arterial road sections
No.
AADT
length
NATIONALLY APPROPRIATE MITIGATION ACTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA
NAMA SHORT DESCRIPTION
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
[m/km]
IRI
(Project)
-
-
0.96
0.96
0.97
0.89
0.89
0.97
0.93
0.97
0.96
0.97
0.96
0.97
0.96
0.96
0.96
0.95
0.97
0.97
0.97
Fuel
efficiency
(nB)
16
18,602
1,105
186
1,668
301
118
2,082
708
151
824
1,215
526
639
311
2,225
1,015
195
1,335
2,631
1,366
[ton/year]
Fuel
consumption
(Baseline)
17,925
1,062
178
1,613
267
105
2,020
660
146
789
1,183
507
617
298
2,146
970
186
1,300
2,554
1,323
[ton/year]
Fuel
consumption
(Project)
-677
-43
-7
-55
-34
-13
-62
-47
-5
-35
-32
-19
-22
-14
-79
-45
-9
-35
-77
-44
[ton/year]
Fuel
consumption
Reduction
NATIONALLY APPROPRIATE MITIGATION ACTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA
NAMA SHORT DESCRIPTION
Emission Reduction
CO2 emission reduction was calculated as follows.
ER = n (BEn - PEn)
ER
Emission Reduction of CO2 [kg]
BEn
Baseline emission in road section
PEn
Project emission in road section
n
n
Reduction of fuel consumption by fuel type in 19 road sections is shown as follow.
Fuel type
Reduction of fuel
consumption
(ton/year)
Emission Reduction
(tCO2/year)
EF
(t CO2 / t fuel)
Petrol
367.7
3.180
1169.4
Diesel
287.9
3.140
904.0
LPG
15.8
3.017
47.7
Hyb
0.0
3.180
0.0
Other
5.3
3.180
16.9
Total
677
-
2,138
Measurement, Reporting, and Verification (MRV)
Monitoring plan
The PERS will conduct quantification and monitoring of greenhouse gas emissions annually in
accordance with internationally recognized methodologies. GHG calculation is NOT required by Air
Protection Law of Serbia. In addition, the PERS will evaluate technically and financially feasible and
cost/effective options to reduce or offset project-related greenhouse gas emissions during project
design and operation.
Installing devices which will allow measuring of CO2 emissions (possible link with Road Weather
Information System - RWIS stations) is part of this project too. Resultats will be automatically
collected and stored (in real time) in PERS Server.
Data and parameters to be monitored:
CO2 emission reduction will be calculated as follows.
ER = n (BEn - PEn)
Ministry of Energy, Development and Environmental Protection, Republic of Serbia
Japan International Cooperation Agency
17
NATIONALLY APPROPRIATE MITIGATION ACTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA
NAMA SHORT DESCRIPTION
ER
Emission Reduction of CO2 [kg]
BEn
Baseline emission in road section
PEn
Project emission in road section
Data / Parameter
Unit
Description
Source of data
Measurement
procedures
Monitoring
frequency
n
n
Road length
km
Length of rehabilitated road section n
Road of Serbia
Yearly
QA/QC procedures
Comment
-
Data / Parameter
N
Unit
vehicle
Description
Number of vehicle with vehicle technology k, fuel type m,
vehicle category j in road section n
Database of Road of Serbia
Source of data
j,k
Measurement
procedures
Monitoring
frequency
PERS will monitor the number of vehicle with vehicle technology ,
fuel type, vehicle category in each road section.
Yearly
QA/QC procedures
Comment
If PERS can not monitor the number of vehicle by vehicle type,
the ratio of vehicle technology k, vehicle category j in all roads of
Serbia will be monitored and used.
Data / Parameter
Vehicle speed
Unit
Description
Source of data
Measurement
procedures
Monitoring
frequency
QA/QC procedures
Comment
Km/h
Average vehicle speed in each road section
Database of Road of Serbia
PERS will monitor vehicle speed in each road section.
Data / Parameter
Unit
Description
FCF j,k
g/km
Fuel Consumption Factor with vehicle technol. k, fuel type m,
vehicle category j, speed range
Source of data
Measurement
procedures
COPERT
-
Yearly
-
Ministry of Energy, Development and Environmental Protection, Republic of Serbia
Japan International Cooperation Agency
18
NATIONALLY APPROPRIATE MITIGATION ACTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA
NAMA SHORT DESCRIPTION
Monitoring
frequency
QA/QC procedures
Yearly
Data / Parameter
IRI
Unit
Description
Source of data
Measurement
procedures
Monitoring
frequency
QA/QC procedures
[m/km]
International Roughness Index
Database of Road of Serbia
PERS will monitor IRI in each road section.
Data / Parameter
Unit
EF j,m
kg CO2/kg
Source of data
Measurement
procedures
Monitoring
frequency
QA/QC procedures
-
Yearly
-
Emission Factor with fuel type m
COPERT or IPPC
Yearly
-
Monitoring plan and structure:
Monitoring activities will be conducted by PERS (or accredited laboratory), based on its ISO 9001:2008
certified quality management system.
PERS will perform monitoring activities and measurement on the site.
Domestic MRV arrangements
Domestic MRV arrangement of Serbia is currently under development.
It is expected that under the Serbian domestic MRV system, a PERS is responsible for the Measurement
(M) and Reporting (R) activities, which will go through Verification (V) from third party. It is expected that
the MRV of proposed NAMA will be conducted in the following manner:
PERS will conduct the Measurement activity based on the above-mentioned monitoring plan in order to
calculate the emission reductions achieved by the NAMA.
PERS will prepare a Report that contains information on 1) the detailed result of the monitoring activities
conducted based on the monitoring plan, 2) the result of emission reduction calculation based on the above
mentioned methodology, and 3) any support received under NAMA scheme from Annex-I countries or
international organization regarding financial support, technical support, or support on capacity building.
Ministry of Energy, Development and Environmental Protection, Republic of Serbia
Japan International Cooperation Agency
19
NATIONALLY APPROPRIATE MITIGATION ACTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA
NAMA SHORT DESCRIPTION
OTHER INFORMATION
Contribution to Sustainable Development
Implementation of the NAMA is meeting majority of the Sustainable Development Indicators in accordance
with three criterion indicated in appendix of the Serbian DNA Rules of procedure.
According to the economic criterion, it satisfies following fields:
1. Social benefits - Economic development of the region – Rehabilitation of proposed road sections will
ensure better traffic conditions on Serbian road network. It can significantly contribute to the economic
development of those regions.
2.
Employment – Rehabilitation of proposed roads will provide work for many domestic companies.
According to the social criterion, it satisfies following fields:
2. Life conditions improvement - Project implementation of such scope, lead up to the employment
increase, as well as income increase, on the local and regional level.
3. Capacity increase - According to the work needs and modern equipment maintenance, strategic
partner will provide training for the employees, as well as expertise and tools for local companies engaged
on this implementation of the project during its operational life.
According to the environment and natural resources criterions, it satisfies following fields:
¾ Energy resources – rehabilitated road sections will ensure smooth traffic and will reduce fuel
consumption.
¾ Air - Due to the application of the modern technology and higher energy efficiency of the road,
project will result in reduced emission levels of CO2, SOx and NOx, comparing to the existing conditions on
proposed road sections.
¾ Soil – Rehabilitation of proposed roads will be performed within the road right of way, so it would not
be necessary to change the purpose of the land. In addition, waste disposal will be at the area anticipated
for this purpose with application of the reclamation measures.
Stakeholder consultation
PERS will conduct a public stakeholder consultation regarding the NAMA. At the consultation, objective
and outcome, expected impacts on local environment, employment opportunities, etc. will be presented
to stakeholders, and their comments will be collected and compiled.
PERS will take necessary due actions to the comments received during the public consultation and report
the results.
Public consultation will be held either through website or through meetings near the project site.
Ministry of Energy, Development and Environmental Protection, Republic of Serbia
Japan International Cooperation Agency
20
NATIONALLY APPROPRIATE MITIGATION ACTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA
NAMA SHORT DESCRIPTION
CONTACT INFORMATION
Implementing Entity (1)
Entity Name
Contact Person
Title
Phone
E-mail
Public Enterprise “Roads of Serbia”
Zoran Drobnjak
General Manager
+381 11 30 40 701
[email protected]
Contact Person
Title
Phone
E-mail
Slavoljub Tubic
Deputy General Manager
+381 11 30 34 744
[email protected]
[email protected]
Contact Person
Title
Phone
E-mail
Gordana Suboticki Djordjevic
Director of Investment Sector
+381 60 840 2280
[email protected]
Contact Person
Title
Phone
E-mail
Velibor Kopanja
Sector for Investments
+381 60 840 2291
[email protected]
Contact Person
Title
Phone
E-mail
Igor Radovic
Sector for Investments
+381 60 840 2302
[email protected]
NAMA Coordinating Entity
Entity Name
Contact Person
Phone
E-mail
Ministry of Energy, Development, and Environmental
Protection
Climate Change Division
State Secretary: Mr. Vladan Zdravkovic
Head of Climate Change Division: Ms. Danijela Bozanic
+381-11-3131-355
[email protected]
Ministry of Energy, Development and Environmental Protection, Republic of Serbia
Japan International Cooperation Agency
21
NATIONALLY APPROPRIATE MITIGATION ACTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA
NAMA SHORT DESCRIPTION
GENERAL INFORMATION
Title of NAMA
Improvement of old residential buildings envelope (exterior doors, windows and thermal
insulation) in Serbia
Description
Description of Mitigation Action
Residential buildings in Serbia up to 1980’s were generally built without any thermal insulation. That is the main
reason for their tremendous energy consumption for space heating today. The objective of this project is
rehabilitation of about 10% of the existing residential buildings in Serbia that were built in the period from
1950’s to 1980’s, what is approximately 10 millions square meters of houses and apartments buildings.
Energy efficiency improvements in selected residential buildings of different size and shape throughout Serbia,
aim to:
a. reduce heat energy consumption and costs;
b. increase the level of indoor comfort and end users’ satisfaction;
c. reduce GHG emission.
Technology/ measure
1. Rehabilitation of buildings’ envelope – thermal insulation of non-transparent elements including external
walls, partitions to unheated spaces, roofs, ceilings, etc.
2. Replacement of windows. Installing new five-chamber PVC frames, double glazing, low-emissivity glass,
filled with argon gas.
With the application of all above-mentioned measures, specific annual energy consumption for heating will
decrease from the simple average value for old targeting buildings (analysis conducted by local companies) of
160 kWh/m2y to 70 kWh/m2y which is limited final energy consumption for heating for rehabilitated old buildings,
according to the Regulations on Energy Efficiency in Buildings (2011).
Potential Number of sites for NAMA project
The number of potential sites for NAMA project is about 10,000 buildings with total surface floor area of 9.66
million square meters as shown in the next table. The surface area of the existing buildings for different period
of construction was taken from Population and housing census in Serbia as well as Statistical Yearbook. Surface
area of windows and walls was estimated for typical buildings in Serbia built in the period from 1950 to 1980.
Ministry of Energy, Development and Environmental Protection, Republic of Serbia
Japan International Cooperation Agency
1
NATIONALLY APPROPRIATE MITIGATION ACTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA
NAMA SHORT DESCRIPTION
Period of
construction
Floor surface area
of the existing
buildings
P (m²)
Area for
rehabilitation
(10% of P)
1951-1960
18,640,781
1,864,000
342,000
3,386,000
1961-1970
33,140,692
3,314,000
607,000
6,021,000
1971-1980
44,878,506
4,488,000
823,000
8,153,000
9,666,000
1,772,000
17,560,000
Total
Windows
surface area
(m²)
Walls and roofs
surface area
(m²)
Location
Targeted residential buildings are located throughout Serbia.
NAMA Implementing Entity
Serbian Ministry of Energy, Development and Environmental Protection in coordination with local
municipalities.
Implementing Schedule
Depending on financial resources dynamic, the project could be implemented continuously or in phases.
Expected starting date of Action
Buildings rehabilitation will start in 2013. Start of operation will continuously happen as each building’s
rehabilitation is completed. The reconstruction of app. 10,000 buildings should be finished in 2020.
Lifetime
Expected lifetime of thermal insulation and new windows is approximately 30 years.
Current Status
There are a certain number of pilot projects of improving building envelope thermal performances,
resulting in heat consumption reduction and GHG emission reduction.
GIZ Project which is currently being implemented aims to support the Serbian government in the
development and implementation of the national programme on energy efficiency for buildings by
improving the existing legal framework, raising awareness on the importance and benefits of energy
efficiency and providing information and financial resources.
Serbia established incentive system for rehabilitation of existing building envelope in certain number of
houses for improving thermal insulation, increasing thermal comfort and reducing energy consumption
for heating. In 2012, former Ministry of Environment, Mining and Spatial Planning granted funds of 1.3
billion RSD (approximately 13 million Euro) to tenants for rehabilitation of existing buildings.
Coverage
Sector: Buildings energy sector
GHG Gases: CO2
Ministry of Energy, Development and Environmental Protection, Republic of Serbia
Japan International Cooperation Agency
2
NATIONALLY APPROPRIATE MITIGATION ACTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA
NAMA SHORT DESCRIPTION
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Finance and Cost
Expected cost of preparation:
EUR 5 million (General design or/and Feasibility study for each of the buildings)
Expected cost of implementation:
EUR 723.48 million
Expected incremental cost of implementation:
none
Financial sources:
A part of financial sources could be provided by building owners. Other parts will include the state and some
sort of non-commercial loans. Establishment of financial measures such as tax incentives for thermal
insulation products, windows and exterior doors will be essential.
The details regarding the financial sources necessary for the preparation and the implementation of the
project will be analyzed in the Feasibility study. The financial mechanism will be decided upon the
completion of the Feasibility study.
Since the Law on Efficient Use of Energy is currently in the last phase of preparation, according to which
Budget Fund will be introduced aiming to secure funds for the purposes of efficient energy use, it is possible
that this project will receive support from that source also.
INFORMATION ON SUPPORT REQUIRED
Description of Support Required䢢
Type of Support
Financial
Technical
Capacity Building
Support required for
Preparation
Support required for
implementation
EUR 5 million
EUR 723.48 million*
x
x
x
x
* EUR 723.48 million is the total cost of the project, of which EUR 144.696 million (20% of the total cost) would be covered
by building owners. The remaining EUR 578.784 million (80%) is the total expected amount required for support. It includes
EUR 217.044 million (30%) for which the state would ask a grant which would be the offered to the owners as a state
subsidy and the remaining EUR 361.74 million (50%) for which some sort of non-commercial loan would be secured.
Ministry of Energy, Development and Environmental Protection, Republic of Serbia
Japan International Cooperation Agency
3
NATIONALLY APPROPRIATE MITIGATION ACTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA
NAMA SHORT DESCRIPTION
EXPECTED GHG EMISSION REDUCTIONS AND MRV
Expected Mitigation Potential
Annual reduction: 503,929 tCO2e
Total reduction: 15,117,870 tCO2e (30 years)
Methodologies and Assumptions
Methodology: Methodology applied for ex-ante GHG estimation is shown below.
BAU scenario: The rehabilitation of existing residential buildings without building envelope thermal
insulation is not conducted. Energy efficiency of these residential buildings remains the same (very low).
Calculation of emission reductions:
Baseline GHG emission
Assumptions:
-
Total floor areas to be rehabilitated in the existing buildings built from 1950’s to 1980’s:
-
Average energy consumption for heating for buildings without thermal insulation built 30-50 years
-
Total annual energy consumption for these buildings:
9,666,000 m2
ago: 160 kWh/m2y
160 kWh/m2y x 9,666,000 m2 = 1,546,560,000 kWh/y
-
Energy is supplied by various sources (% share in the market based on the data from PE “Belgrade
District Heating”):
Electricity (40%) District heating (40%) Coal (10%) Natural gas (10%)
Fuel/energy
Share of the
Final energy
Conversion factor
Primary energy
Primary energy
market [%]
[GWh/y]
to primary
[GWh/y]
[TJ/y]
energy
Electricity
40
618.62
1
618.62
2,227.03
District heating
40
618.62
1.3*
804.21
2,895.16
Coal
10
154.66
1.3**
201.06
723.82
154.66
**
170.13
612.47
1,794.02
6,458.48
Natural gas
10

1.1
1,546.56
* An average value for all heat plants in DH systems fueled with different fuels (natural gas, heavy oil,
light oil, coal) including heat losses in pipelines (estimation):
ǆDH = (0.5 · 0.9 + 0.3 · 0.85 + 0.2 · 0.75) – 0.1 = 0.76
**
Based on average value of boiler efficiency (for coal 75%, for natural gas 90 to 92%)
Ministry of Energy, Development and Environmental Protection, Republic of Serbia
Japan International Cooperation Agency
4
NATIONALLY APPROPRIATE MITIGATION ACTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA
NAMA SHORT DESCRIPTION
Fuel/energy
Primary energy
Electricity
CO2 Emission factor
CO2 emission [t CO2/y]
618,620 [MWh/y]
0.945 [t CO2/MWh]
584,596
2,895.16 [TJ/y]
71 [t CO2/TJ]*
205,556
Coal
723.82 [TJ/y]
98.6 [t CO2/TJ]**
71,369
Natural gas
612.47 [TJ/y]
56.1 [t CO2/TJ]
34,360
-
895,881
District heating

* An average value for natural gas (50%), light and heavy oil (30%) and coal (20%) (estimation based
on the data from district heating companies in Serbia).
** An average value for lignite and brown coal used in Serbia.
GHG emission after implementing project (10,000 buildings rehabilitation)
Total floor areas to be rehabilitated in the existing buildings built from 1950’s to 1980’s: 9,666,000 m2
Average energy consumption for heating after buildings rehabilitation (according to the new Regulation on
Energy Efficiency in Buildings): 70 kWh/m2y.
Total energy consumption: 70 kWh/m2y x 9,666,000 m2 = 676,620,000 kWh/y
Energy is supplied by various sources (% share in the market):
Electricity (40%) District heating (40%) Coal (10%) Natural gas (10%)
Fuel/energy
Share of the
Final energy
Conversion factor
Primary energy
Primary energy
market [%]
[GWh/y]
to primary
[GWh/y]
[TJ/y]
energy
Electricity
40
270.65
1
270.65
974.34
District heating
40
270.65
1.3*
351.85
1,266.66
Coal
10
67.66
1.3
87.96
316.66
Natural gas
10
67.66
1.1
74.43
267.95
784.89
2,825.61

676.62
* An average value for all heat plants in DH systems fueled with different fuels
Fuel/energy
Primary energy
Electricity
CO2 Emission factor
CO2 emission [t CO2/y]
270,650 [MWh/y]
0.945 [t CO2/MWh]
255,764
1,266.66 [TJ/y]
71 [t CO2/TJ]*
89,933
Coal
316.66 [TJ/y]
98.6 [t CO2/TJ]**
31,223
Natural gas
267.95 [TJ/y]
56.1 [t CO2/TJ]
15,032
-
391,952
District heating

Ministry of Energy, Development and Environmental Protection, Republic of Serbia
Japan International Cooperation Agency
5
NATIONALLY APPROPRIATE MITIGATION ACTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA
NAMA SHORT DESCRIPTION
* An average value for natural gas (50%), light and heavy oil (30%) and coal (20%):
EFDH = (0.5 · 56.1 + 0.3 · 77.4 + 0.2 · 98.6) = 71
** For mixture of lignite and brown coal used in boilers in Serbia.
GHG emission reduction
GHG emission reduction = 895,881 - 391,952 = 503,929 [t CO2e/y]
Measurement, Reporting, and Verification (MRV)
Monitoring Plan
Improvement of old residential buildings envelope will be implemented according to the Regulations on
Energy Efficiency in Buildings (2011) and Regulations on Certification of Energy Performance of Buildings
(2011).
The Regulations on Energy Efficiency in Buildings prescribes the energy performance and the way to
calculate thermal performance of buildings, as well as the requirements regarding energy performance for
new and existing facilities. The Regulations categorizes buildings based on energy properties and methods
of calculating thermal properties.
Regulation on Certification of Energy Performance of Buildings requires building owners to prepare energy
plan for their building before rehabilitation works, and have to receive energy audit and certification by
accredited companies and then submit the “Energy Passport” (please see below for the contents of Energy
Passport) to responsible entities (Ministries or Municipalities). After implementation, building owners have
to receive re-certification by accredited companies and submit revised Energy Passport to responsible
entities (Ministries or Municipalities).
Ministry of Construction and Urbanism will monitor all issued Energy Passports before and after
implementation of the proposed rehabilitation works, and confirm CO2 emission of the building in each
Energy Passport.
Energy Passport includes the following information;
1. General information of the Building, Energy certificates for buildings
2. Data on building, climate condition, HVAC (heating, ventilation, and air conditioning), building
envelope
3. Data on heating system of the building, heating control system, heat loss of the building,
Energy needs of the building, energy consumption, CO2 emissions
4. Proposals for improvement of the energy efficiency of the building
Through comparison of the CO2 emission described in each Energy Passport (before/ after), CO2 emission
reduction will be confirmed.
Ministry of Energy, Development and Environmental Protection, Republic of Serbia
Japan International Cooperation Agency
6
NATIONALLY APPROPRIATE MITIGATION ACTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA
NAMA SHORT DESCRIPTION
Data and parameters to be monitored:
CO2 Emission reduction will be calculated as follows.
ERy = n䢢 (BEi – PEi)
Where:
ER y = Emission Reduction in Year y
n
= Number of rehabilitated buildings that with Energy Passports issued.
BE i = CO2 Emission before rehabilitation in building i
PE i = CO2 Emission after rehabilitation in building i
Data / Parameter
Unit
Description
Source of data
Measurement procedures
Monitoring frequency
QA/QC procedures
ER i
kg-CO2/ year
Amount of CO2 Emission Reduction as a result of building
envelope improvement
Energy Passport issued to each rehabilitated building (both
Energy Passports that are prepared before and after
rehabilitation will be monitored)
Ministry of Construction and Urbanism will monitor all issued
Energy Passports before and after implementation of
rehabilitation works, and confirm CO2 emission of the building.
Through comparison of the CO2 emissions described in each
Energy Passports (before/ after), CO2 emission reduction will
be calculated.
Once a year
via web-site
Monitoring plan and structure:
The final structure of the project has not yet been completely defined, as it is being developed as part of the
GIZ Project - Energy Efficiency in Buildings, which will result in setting up a web site which will contain all
the data, information and analysis regarding the subject of energy efficiency in buildings and GHG
emissions. As a result of cooperation of GIZ and the Faculty of Architecture of Belgrade University, with the
support of the Ministry of Construction and Urbanism, the Typology project was completed, results of which
are available on www.building-typology.eu with detailed information of types of residential buildings in
Serbia. This information will be used in the preparation of the Feasibility study of this project.
The concept of monitoring structure is shown in the figure below.
Ministry of Energy, Development and Environmental Protection, Republic of Serbia
Japan International Cooperation Agency
7
NATIONALLY APPROPRIATE MITIGATION ACTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA
NAMA SHORT DESCRIPTION
Monitoring will be conducted both before and after the project implementation. Before the implementation,
the following will be conducted: submission of the Energy Passport by the
investors/developers/municipalities to either Ministry or the municipalities upon which permission of
construction will be issued; online quality control of issued passports; analysis and statistical processing of
the data regarding: Energy Passports, U-values, Energy Passport recommendations, potential EE and GHG
according to passports and building typology, number of experienced engineers, etc. The data will be
submitted by engineers, municipalities and institutions involved. The entire system will also be accessible to
general public via internet.
After the implementation, following monitoring activities will be conducted: submission of the revised
Energy Passport by the companies authorized for certification/ to the Ministry or the municipalities upon
which permission for use will be issued; online quality control of issued passports submitted to the Ministry;
submission of the reports to the Verification entity.
Ministry of Energy, Development and Environmental Protection, Republic of Serbia
Japan International Cooperation Agency
8
NATIONALLY APPROPRIATE MITIGATION ACTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA
NAMA SHORT DESCRIPTION
Domestic MRV arrangements
Domestic MRV arrangement of Serbia is currently under development.
It is expected that under the Serbian domestic MRV system, a NAMA implementing entity is responsible
for the Measurement (M) and Reporting (R) activities, which will go through Verification (V) from third
party.
It is expected that the MRV of the proposed NAMA will be conducted in the following manner.
1.
2.
Ministry of Construction and Urbanism will conduct and supervise the Measurement activities based on
the above-mentioned monitoring plan in order to calculate the emission reductions achieved by the
NAMA.
Ministry of Construction and Urbanism will prepare a Report that contains information on 1) the
detailed result of the monitoring activities conducted based on the monitoring plan, 2) the result of
emission reduction calculation, and 3) any support received under NAMA scheme from Annex-I
countries or international organizations regarding financial support, technical support, or support on
capacity building.
Ministry of Energy, Development and Environmental Protection, Republic of Serbia
Japan International Cooperation Agency
9
NATIONALLY APPROPRIATE MITIGATION ACTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA
NAMA SHORT DESCRIPTION
OTHER INFORMATION
Contribution to Sustainable Development
The project will have various positive economic, social and environmental effects. The project counts on the
involvement of local partners in terms of production of construction products, project design and execution
of works. It will increase demand and production of construction products, thus resulting in increase of
revenue and employment of local companies, contributing to economic development of all regions of Serbia.
The project requires the involvement of stakeholders at local level (enterprises, certified engineers, local
authorities for issuing building permits). As for the environmental impact - the implementation of the
project will result in reduction of energy consumption, reduction of GHG emissions and the increase the
level of indoor comfort and end users’ satisfaction.
Stakeholder consultation
Numerous meetings with building owners, representatives of local authorities and certified engineers have
been held so far in 30 communities throughout Serbia, as a part of the project of GIZ. Implementation of
energy efficiency measures and GHG emission reductions were promoted, raising awareness amongst
members of the local communities and local authorities regarding the positive impacts of the introduction of
the energy efficiency measures and Energy Passports.
Ministry of Energy, Development and Environmental Protection, Republic of Serbia
Japan International Cooperation Agency
10
NATIONALLY APPROPRIATE MITIGATION ACTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA
NAMA SHORT DESCRIPTION
CONTACT INFORMATION
NAMA Implementing Entity
Entity Name
Contact Person
Title
Phone
E-mail
Serbian Ministry of Construction and Urbanism
Ms. Jasminka Pavlovic
Senior Adviser, Sector for Construction and Land, Head of
Department for Energy Efficiency and Construction Products
+381 11 3616 420
[email protected]
NAMA Coordinating Entity
Entity Name
Contact Person
Phone
E-mail
Ministry of Energy, Development, and Environmental
Protection
Climate Change Division
State Secretary: Mr. Vladan Zdravkovic
Head of Climate Change Division: Ms. Danijela Bozanic
+381-11-3131-355
[email protected]
Ministry of Energy, Development and Environmental Protection, Republic of Serbia
Japan International Cooperation Agency
11
NATIONALLY APPROPRIATE MITIGATION ACTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA
NAMA SHORT DESCRIPTION
GENERAL INFORMATION
Title of NAMA
Energy Efficiency Improvements in Public Buildings: 23 schools and 26 hospitals
Energy Efficiency Project (SEEP)
– Serbian
Description
Description of the Mitigation Action
The overall goal of the Project is to provide optimal conditions for the people living and working in public
buildings, 23 schools and 26 hospitals, in an energy efficient and sustainable manner.
The NAMA involves refurbishment of 23 schools and 26 hospitals throughout Serbia.
The total potentially refurbished area of the 23 schools is 76,483 m2 with expected CO2 emission reduction of
2,142 tones/annually and the total potentially refurbished area of the 26 hospitals is 143,825 m2 with expected
CO2 emission reduction of 6,184 tones/annually.
The total potentially refurbished area of the 23 schools and 26 hospitals is 220,308 m2 with expected CO2
emission reduction of 8,326 tones/annually.
The NAMA will contribute to climate change mitigation as refurbished Public buildings will use less energy and
consequently emit less CO2 for about 8,326 tones/annually during their life cycle that would be emitted in
absence of the mitigation action.
Detailed list of the 23 schools and 26 hospitals are given in tables in annex.
Technologies/ measures
The measures proposed can be divided into two general groups:
1. Upgrading the building envelope (e.g. insulating walls, roofs, ceiling, basement; replacing windows;
etc.);
2. Upgrading the heating system (equipment and controls – both central plant and local terminal units);
Detailed list of the measures proposed on 23 schools and 26 hospitals are given in tables in annex.
Ministry of Energy, Development, Environmental Protection, Republic of Serbia
Japan International Cooperation Agency
1
NATIONALLY APPROPRIATE MITIGATION ACTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA
NAMA SHORT DESCRIPTION
Location
23 locations of schools and 26 locations of hospitals are shown in the maps below
Numerations are according tables in annex
SCHOOLS
HOSPITALS
NAMA Implementing Entity
Ministry of Energy, Development and Environmental Protection - MEDEP
Implementation and Measurement, Reporting, and Verification (MRV) process should be implemented in
cooperation with:
Energy Managers – when system of energy managers will be established. By new Law on Efficient
Use of Energy (draft) should be established this system.
Local Governments – responsible for schools
Hospital’s management – responsible for hospitals
Implementing Schedule
Expected starting date of Action
Buildings rehabilitation will start in 2013 or when the project will accept.
Depending on financial resources dynamic, the project could be implemented continuously or in phases.
Lifetime
25 years for installed envelopes
According by manufacturers specified life time of the installed equipments
Ministry of Energy, Development, Environmental Protection, Republic of Serbia
Japan International Cooperation Agency
2
NATIONALLY APPROPRIATE MITIGATION ACTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA
NAMA SHORT DESCRIPTION
Current Status
Preliminary energy audits for target 49 public buildings completed in 2007 and 2009
Seeking the financial source
As project is not yet accepted there is no coordination with local governments responsible for schools and
hospital’s management. Only previously coordination was in the frame of the project SEEP 2.
Coverage
Sector: Buildings
GHG Gases: CO2
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Finance and Cost
Expected cost of preparation: 1.6 million euro
Expected cost of preparation is about 15% of Total expected cost for implementation:
¾ Detailed audits - checking of the primary defined EE measures by Preliminary audits carried out before
several years,
¾ Preparation of project documentation,
¾ Building Certification,
¾ Tendering,
¾ Supervision
Expected cost of implementation: 10.90 million Euros.
¾ for 23 schools is 4.97 million euro,
¾ for 26 hospitals is 5.93 million euro
¾ Please see Attachment for the investment cost of each building
Expected incremental cost of implementation: N/A
Financial sources identified: Not identified, but soft loan, donations, grants, etc. are possible. Also, ESCO
model are one of the option for financing.
One part of financial sources could be provided by building owners.
Financial analysis: Please see Attachment for expected investment cost and payback period for each of
the building.
Ministry of Energy, Development, Environmental Protection, Republic of Serbia
Japan International Cooperation Agency
3
NATIONALLY APPROPRIATE MITIGATION ACTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA
NAMA SHORT DESCRIPTION
INFORMATION ON SUPPORT REQUIRED
Description of Support Required
Support required for
preparation
Support required for
implementation
Expected cost of preparation and
MRV of 1.6 million euro is about
15% of Total expected cost for
implementation for:
Detailed audits - checking of
the primary defined EE
measures by Preliminary audits
Preparation of project
documentation,
Building Certification
Tendering,
Supervision
Expected cost of implementation of
refurbishment 23 schools and 26
hospitals throughout Serbia is 10.9
million euro.
Technical
x
X
Capacity Building
x
x
Type of Support
Financial
EXPECTED GHG EMISSION REDUCTIONS AND MRV
Expected Mitigation Potential
Annual reduction:
Schools: 2,142 tCO2e/y
Hospitals: 6,184 tCO2e/y
Total: 8,326 tCO2e/y
Total reduction: 208,150 tCO2e (25 years)
BAU scenario: Energy efficiency level of schools and hospitals remains same as the current level
Calculation of emission reduction
Ex-ante estimation of GHG emission reductions was conducted using the available monitored data from the
previous energy efficiency improvement projects by the same NAMA implementing entity called “Serbian
Energy Efficiency Project I (SEEP I)” and “Serbian Energy Efficiency Project II (SEEP II).” Both projects
involved installation to the same types of public buildings, i.e. schools and hospitals, of energy saving
measures such as window replacement, modernization of boiler rooms and substations, installation of
radiator thermostatic valves, etc.
Ministry of Energy, Development, Environmental Protection, Republic of Serbia
Japan International Cooperation Agency
4
NATIONALLY APPROPRIATE MITIGATION ACTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA
NAMA SHORT DESCRIPTION
In these previous projects, the NAMA implementing entity conducted monitoring of the buildings by
measuring the amount of energy consumption by each building and calculating CO2 emissions before and
after rehabilitation.
Results of the monitoring activities are shown below.
Building
Project
type
name
Schools
Number of
Total area of
CO2 emission
monitored
the building
reduction
2
buildings
(m )
(kg CO2/m2y)
SEEP I
16
51,589
29
SEEP II
9
32,876
27
Average
Hospitals
28
SEEP I
12
69,577
39
SEEP II
17
75,915
47
Average
43
Average value of CO2 emission reduction from all monitored schools in SEEP I and SEEP II (28 kg CO2/m2y)
was applied to the total floor size of the 23 schools of the proposed NAMA project in order to estimate the
expected annual CO2 emission reduction from schools:
¨ CO2 = 76,483 m2 · 28 kg CO2/m2y = 2,142 t CO2/y
Similarly, average value of CO2 emission reduction from monitored hospitals in the previous projects (43 kg
CO2/m2y) was applied to 26 hospitals for NAMA. Total expected annual CO2 emission reduction from
hospitals is:
¨ CO2 = 143,825 m2 · 43 kg CO2/m2y = 6,184 t CO2/y
Measurement, Reporting, and Verification (MRV)
Monitoring plan
Ex-post calculation of GHG emission reduction will be conducted based on the information on CO2 emissions
before and after rehabilitation of each target building, which will be contained in an official document called
“Energy Passport,” which is required to be prepared by each building owner and be submitted to the ministry
under the Serbia’s regulation “Regulation on Certification of Energy Performance of Buildings.”
Regulation on Certification of Energy Performance of Buildings requires building owners to prepare energy
performance improvement plan for their building before rehabilitation works, and have to receive energy audit
and certification by accredited companies and then submit the “Energy Passport” to responsible ministries
or municipalities. After implementation, building owners have to receive re-certification by accredited companies
Ministry of Energy, Development, Environmental Protection, Republic of Serbia
Japan International Cooperation Agency
5
NATIONALLY APPROPRIATE MITIGATION ACTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA
NAMA SHORT DESCRIPTION
and submit revised Energy Passport to responsible ministries or municipalities.
Energy Passport includes the following information;
1. General information of the building, energy certificates for buildings
2. Data on building, climate condition, HVAC (heating, ventilation, and air conditioning), building
envelope
3. Data on heating system of the building, heating control system, heat loss of the building,
energy needs of the building, energy consumption
4. CO2 emissions from the building (automatically calculated)
5. Proposals for improvement of the energy efficiency of the building
Through comparing CO2 emissions described in each Energy Passport, which is prepared before and after
rehabilitation takes place, CO2 emission reduction will be confirmed.
Energy Manager who will be assigned for a certain public building(s) will monitor Energy Passports issued
both before and after implementation of the proposed rehabilitation works, and confirm CO2 emission reductions
of the building.
Energy manager will also be responsible for reporting the calculated amount of CO2 emission reduction of each
rehabilitated public building to Ministry of Energy, Development and Environmental Protection (MEDEP). The
government of Serbia in cooperation with GIZ is currently developing an online system to manage all the issued
Energy Passports and CO2 emissions data contained in these Energy Passports, which will make the monitoring
activity even more efficient and transparent.
Total CO2 emission reduction (ER) from all target schools and hospitals will be calculated as follows.
ERschool + ERhospital
ER
=
ERschool
= ෤ (BEschool
ERhospital
= ෤ (BEhospital – PEhospital)
– PEschool)
Data and parameters to be monitored:
Data / Parameter
Unit
Description
Source of data
Measurement
procedures
Monitoring
frequency
ER
kg-CO2/ year
Amount of CO2 emission reduction achieved through installing
energy saving measures at each building
- Energy Passport issued to each rehabilitated building before
rehabilitation
- Energy Passport issued to each rehabilitated building after
rehabilitation
Energy Manager will monitor all Energy Passports issued before
and after implementation of rehabilitation works, and confirm CO2
emissions of the building. Through comparison of the CO2
emissions described in each Energy Passports (before/ after), CO2
emission reduction will be calculated.
Yearly
Ministry of Energy, Development, Environmental Protection, Republic of Serbia
Japan International Cooperation Agency
6
NATIONALLY APPROPRIATE MITIGATION ACTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA
NAMA SHORT DESCRIPTION
Monitoring plan and structure:
MRV process should be established and implemented in cooperation with:
Ministry of Energy, Development and Environmental Protection (MEDEP)
Energy Managers
Local Governments – responsible for schools
Hospital’s management – responsible for hospitals
Statistics,Analysisand
ReportingLevel:MEDEP
EP: Energy
Passport
PotentialofEnergySavingand
GHGreduction
Verification
Entity
Ministry
䞉Analyze EP issued and classes
䞉Review the standard (e.g.-value s)
䞉Training and registry engineers for
Energy manager
MEDEP
Minis try/
Municipalities
InputLevel:
Municipalities,Institutions
MRV
ImplementationofEnergy
SavingandGHGreduction
Accredited Companies or
Engineers
䞉Energy audit
䞉EE recommendation
䞉Issuance of EP
Submission
of Plan, etc..
Permission for
construction
(rehabilitation)
Accredited
Companies and
Engineers
䞉Check implementation
䞉Revision of EP
School/Hospital /
Municipalities
䞉Design/ Energy planning
Reporting
Energy Manager
Submissi on
of revi sed
EP
Permission
for use
Passport(revised)
Passport
School/ Hospital/
Municipalities
Ministry/
Municipalities
School/ Hospital /
Municipalities
䞉Implementation of rehabilitation
䞉Data Co lle cti on and
analysis
Dataof
fuelConsumption
School/
Hospital/
Municipalities
School/ Hospital
Municipalities
Domestic MRV arrangements
Domestic MRV arrangement of Serbia is currently under development.
It is expected that under the Serbian domestic MRV system, a NAMA implementing entity is responsible
for the Measurement (M) and Reporting (R) activities, which will go through Verification (V) from third
party.
It is expected that the MRV of the proposed NAMA will be conducted in the following manner.
1.
2.
MEDEP will supervise the Measurement activities based on the above-mentioned monitoring plan in
order to calculate the emission reductions achieved by the NAMA.
MEDEP will prepare a Report that contains information on 1) the detailed result of the monitoring
activities conducted based on the monitoring plan, 2) the result of emission reduction calculation based
on the above mentioned methodology, and 3) any support received under NAMA scheme from Annex-I
countries or international organization regarding financial support, technical support, or support on
capacity building.
Ministry of Energy, Development, Environmental Protection, Republic of Serbia
Japan International Cooperation Agency
7
NATIONALLY APPROPRIATE MITIGATION ACTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA
NAMA SHORT DESCRIPTION
OTHER INFORMATION
Contribution to Sustainable Development
23 schools and 26 hospitals will be retrofitted.
Reduction of fuel consumption
Energy efficiency improvement experience and awareness raising among the municipal and local
government officials
Sector’s policy / Target
The overview of the potential energy efficiency improvement (EEI) measures in residential sector and
commercial and public to be implemented in the scope of within National Energy Efficiency Action Plan. The
targets of different sectors have been set on the basis of estimated potential of various technical measures
and are based on the estimated electricity consumption by sub-sectors.
Expected energy savings in 2018 (Public and commercial activities / building) 0.22 Mtoe
Stakeholder consultation
MEDEP plans to inform interested parties about NAMA project through: its website, mass media and direct
contact with stakeholders.
MEDEP plans to collect comments from local governments, facilities management and energy managers by
e-mails and through direct contact with interested parties.
CONTACT INFORMATION
Implementing Entity
Entity Name
Contact Person
Title
Phone
E-mail
Ministry of Energy, Development and Environmental Protection
Dimitrije Lilic
Senior Advisor
+381-11-3131-955
[email protected]
NAMA Coordinating Entity
Entity Name
Contact Person
Phone
E-mail
Ministry of Energy, Development, and Environmental
Protection
Climate Change Division
State Secretary: Mr. Vladan Zdravkovic
Head of Climate Change Division: Ms. Danijela Bozanic
+381-11-3131-355
[email protected]
Ministry of Energy, Development, Environmental Protection, Republic of Serbia
Japan International Cooperation Agency
8
NATIONALLY APPROPRIATE MITIGATION ACTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA
NAMA SHORT DESCRIPTION
Attachment
List of target schools
No
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
Name of the Building
Secondary school "Besedeš Jož
ef" Kanjiža
Secondary school "Ĉura Jakšiü"
Raþa (fiskulturna sala)
Primary school "Vuk Karadžiü"
Lovüenac
Aeronautical-technical school
"Petar Drapšin" Beograd
Secondary school "Lazar Nešiü"
Subotica
Primary school "Veljko Vlahoviü"
Peþenjevce
Primary school "ýeh Karolj" Ada
Location
Investment
cost
Pay back
period
(m²)
(EUR)
years
Proposed measures
Senta
2,623
291,415
7.5
1.Wi ndow Replacement 2.Wall and roof Insu lation
3.Thermocontrol
Kragujevac
1,455
110,580
5.4
1. Window Replacement in the gym 2.Wall and roof
Insulation 3.Thermocontrol 4.Boiler reconstruction
Vrbas
3,502
310,000
17.8
1.Wi ndow Replacement 2.Wall and roof Insu lation
3.Thermocontrol 4.Gas burner
Beograd
2,700
202,770
11.0
1. Window Replacement 2. Mechanical works
Subotica
5,670
207,511
5.6
1.Wi ndow Replacement 2.Thermocontrol
Leskovac
1,632
131,375
7.8
1.Wi ndow Replacement 2.Wall Insulation
3.Thermocontrol 4.Boiler Replacement
Senta
3,208
258,245
11.1
1.Wi ndow Replacement 2.Wall and roof Insu lation
3.Thermocontrol 4.New boiler room
2,667
236,296
9.8
1,465
111,340
6.3
898
72,378
10.5
1,630
89,650
10.8
4,040
460,560
20.2
1,019
76,526
5.9
6,376
478,837
16.2
1.Wi ndow Replacement 2. Roof Insulation
3.Thermocontrol 4. Bala ncing
8,277
455,235
14.9
1.Wi ndow replacement 2.Wall and roof Insulation
3.Thermocontrol 4.Balancing
4,958
272,250
12.9
4,853
266,915
14.5
1,960
78,400
6.8
1.Wa ll and roof Insulation 2.Thermoco ntrol
ýaþak
3,910
346,426
13.4
1.Wi ndow Replacement 2. Wall and roof Insulation
3.Thermocontrol 4. Bala ncing
Primary school "ýibukovaþki
Kraljevo
partizani" Kraljevo
Primary school "Svetozar
Kragujevac
Markoviü" Lapovo
Primary school "Janko
Šabac
Veselinoviü" Crna Bara
Primary school "Vuk Karadžiü"
Vrbas
Baþko Dobro Polje
Primary school "Dimitrije
Knjaževac
Todoroviü" Knjaževac
Primary school "Borivoje Milojevi
Krupanj
ü" Krupanj
Primary school"Vuk Karadžiü"
Kladovo
Kladovo
Technical school "Rade metalac"
Leskovac
Leskovac
Primary school "Jovan Cvijiü"
Kostolac
Kostolac
Primary school "Hristo Botev"
Dimitrovgrad
(Moše Pijade) Dimitrovgrad
Secondary school "Miloš Savkovi
Arandjelovac
ü" Aranÿelovac
19 Primary school "Filip Filipoviü"
Area
1.Wi ndow Replacement 2.Wall and roof Insu lation
3.Thermocontrol 4.Balancing
1.Wi ndow Replacement 2.Wall and Ceiling Insulation
3.Thermocontrol
1.Wi ndow Replacement 2.Wall and roof Insu lation
3.Thermocontrol 4.Boiler Replacement
1.Wa ll and roof Insulation 2.Partial Replacement of
Windows and Doors 3.Thermocontrol
1.Wi ndow Replacement 2.Wall and roof Insu lation
3.Thermocontrol 4.Balancing
1.Wi ndow Replacement 2.Thermocontrol 3.
Balancing 4.Heat Pip eline Reparation
1.Wi ndow Replacement 2.Wall and roof Insu lation
3.Thermocontrol 4. Bala ncing
1.Wi ndow Replacement 2.Wall and roof Insu lation
3.Thermocontrol 4.Balancing
20
Primary school"Ljupþe Španac"
Bela Palanka
Bela Palanka
3,153
173,415
11.1
1.Wi ndow Replacement 2.Wall and roof Insu lation
21
Agriculture and Forestry Secondary
School"J osif Panþiü" Surdulica
Surdulica
3,475
139,000
17.9
1.Wa ll and roof Insulation 2.Thermoco ntrol 3.
Balancing
22
Secondary Economic School
Valjevo
Valjevo
3,714
69,160
5.6
1.Onl y works in boiler room (windows replaced in 2003,
brick facade, flat roof in good condition)
Loznica
3,298
131,920
17.4
1.Wa ll and roof Insulation 2.Thermoco ntrol
* Windows have already been rep laced if not given
23 Primary school "Vuk Karadžiü"
Average
3,325
216,096
11.3
Total
76,483
4,970,204
-
Ministry of Energy, Development, Environmental Protection, Republic of Serbia
Japan International Cooperation Agency
9
NATIONALLY APPROPRIATE MITIGATION ACTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA
NAMA SHORT DESCRIPTION
List of target hospitals
No
Name of the Building
Location
Area
Investment
cost
Pay back
period
(m²)
(EUR)
years
Proposed measures
Gornji
Milanovac
4,714
188,560
3.9
1 .Window Replacement 2.Roof Insulation
3 .The rmocontrol
Beograd
17,500
262,500
5.1
1 .Gas Boiler Room 2.Thermocontrol
Kuršumlija
1,522
63,091
3.0
1 .Wall and roof Insulation 2.Thermocontrol 3.Balanci ng
Special Rehabilitation Hospital"
AGENS" Mataruška Banja
Kraljevo
5,939
478,683
6.7
1 .Window Replacement 2.Wall and roof Insulation
3 .The rmocontrol 4.Gas Boiler Room
5
Institute for Thyroid Gland and Metabolism
"ýigota" Zlatibor (Block A)
Zlatibor
2,425
195,455
6.5
1 .Window Replacement 2.Roof Insulation
3 .The rmocontrol 4.Gas Boiler Room
6
Clinical Centre (Orthopaedic Ward and
Traumatology) Novi Sad
Novi Sad
1,520
60,800
3.8
1 .Window Replacement 2. Roof Insulation
3 .The rmocontrol
7
General Hospital Leskovac
Leskovac
2,425
160,292
6.6
1 . Window Replacement 2.Wall and roof Insulation
3 .The rmocontrol 4.Bal ancing
8
Medical Centre Prokuplje
Prokuplje
2,776
183,493
4.5
9
Special Hospital "Ozren" (Department of
Thoracic Medicine) Sokobanja
Sokobanja
5,936
478,442
13.4
10
Special Hospital "Sveti Vraþevi" Novi
Kneževac
Kikinda
3,489
167,921
7.9
11 Medical Centre Zajeþar
Zajeþar
3,476
235,673
3.5
Special Rehabilitation Hospital
12
(Children's Ward) Banja Koviljaþa
Loznica
1,502
60,080
6.5
Užice
26,244
787,320
11.9
Kikinda
11,575
347,250
9.3
Vrbas
2,520
138,300
6.4
Zrenjanin
10,533
526,650
12.3
Kikinda
1,078
109,872
17.3
ýaþak
3,301
218,196
11.2
Novi Sad
6,857
351,764
12.0
Ivanjica
5,614
224,560
7.0
Bor
4,194
153,500
5.7
1 .Wall and roof Insulation 2.Thermocontrol 3.Balanci ng
Kragujevac
582
18,915
4.5
1 .Window Replacement 2.Ceiling Insulation
Jagodina
7,920
316,800
10.1
Loznica
690
25,254
15.0
Sombor
6,181
80,165
8.1
Ljubovija
3,312
99,369
9.7
5,532
228,189
1
Medical Centre Gornji Milanovac
2
Rehabilitation Institute "Dr Miroslav
Zotoviü" Sokobanjska 13, Beograd
3
Medical Centre Kuršumlija
4
13 Medical Centre Užice
Medical Centre "Kosta Sredojeviü Š
14
ljuka" Kikinda
15 Polyclinic Kula
16 Special Hospital «Rusanda» Melenci
17 Polyclinic Novi Kneževac
Medical Centre "Dr Dragisa Mišoviü" ý
aþak / Polyclinic Ivanjica
Special Hospital "Dr Borivoje Gnjatiü"
19
Stari Slankamen
Blood Disease Institute "Anemija"
20
Ivanjica
18
21 Medical Centre Bor
22
Clinical Hospital Centre
(pharmacology) Kragujevac
23 Medical Centre
Medical Centre «Dr Milenko Marin»
(psychiatric ward), Loz nica
Medical Centre "Dr Radivoje Simonovi
25
ü" Sombor
24
26 Polyclinic Ljubovija
1 .Window Replacement 2.Wall and roof Insulation
3 .The rmocontrol 4. Ba lancing
1 .Partial Window Replace ment 2.Ceiling In sulation
3 .The rmocontrol 4.Boi ler Reconstructio n
1 .Window Replacement 2.Wall and roof Insulation
3 .The rmocontrol
p 4. Pipe insulation
g
4 .Heat Pipeline Reparation 5. Boiler Roo m
Reconstruction
1 .Window and Door Replacement 2.Roof Insulation
3 .The rmocontrol 4.Bal ancing
1 . Window Replacement 2.Th ermocontrol
1 .Window Replacement 2.Thermocontrol 3. Pip e
i nsulation 4.Balancing
1 .Wall and roof Insulation 2.Thermocontrol 3.Gas Boiler
Room
1 .Window Replacement 2.Wall and roof Insulation
3 .The rmocontrol 4.Heat Pipeline Reparation
1 .Window Replacement 2.Wall and roof Insulation
3 .The rmocontrol 4.Gas Boiler Room
1 .Window Replacement 2.Wall Insulation
3 .The rmocontrol 4.Bal ancing
1 .Window Replacement 2.Wall and roof Insulation
3 .The rmocontrol
1 .Partial Window Replace ment 2.Wall and roof
Insulation 3.Thermo control 4.Balancing
1 .Roof Insulation 2.Thermocontrol 3. New Boiler
1 .Wall and roof Insulation 2.Thermocontrol 3.Balanci ng
4 . Pipe insulati on
1 .Door replacemen t 2.Thermocontrol 3.Heat Pipeline
Reparation
1 .Roof Insulation 2.Thermocontrol 3.Balancing
* Windows have already been replaced if not given
Average
8.2 *Thermocontrol - replacement of all radiators ' valves and
thermos tatic valves
Total
143,825
5,932,905
-
Ministry of Energy, Development, Environmental Protection, Republic of Serbia
Japan International Cooperation Agency
10

セルビア国 国としての適切な緩和行動（NAMA）

Comments

Description

Transcript

セルビア国国としての適切な緩和行動（NAMA）